Connect with us

News

US Supreme Court doubt over student debt relief looms over Biden agenda

Published

on

US Supreme Court doubt over student debt relief looms over Biden agenda

WASHINGTON, March 1 (Reuters) – The skepticism expressed by conservative U.S. Supreme Courtroom justices towards President Joe Biden’s transfer to forgive $430 billion in pupil debt not solely forged doubt on the plan’s destiny but additionally signaled bother forward for using government energy to get issues carried out in his remaining time in workplace.

Questions posed by the conservative justices throughout arguments on Tuesday over Biden’s debt reduction indicated that the conservative-majority courtroom may strike down the plan as an illegal overreach of government energy.

The conservative justices could apply the exacting authorized customary that they’ve used to undo prior coverage actions by Biden – one that would cease him from using government energy to enact different objects on his agenda at the same time as he offers with a divided Congress unlikely to cross laws he desires.

Republicans management the Home of Representatives whereas Biden’s fellow Democrats management the Senate.

The courtroom is because of rule by the tip of June on the legality of the debt reduction, which the administration argued was lawful below authority given to the manager department by the Larger Training Aid Alternatives for College students Act, or HEROES Act. That 2003 legislation authorizes the U.S. training secretary to “waive or modify” pupil monetary help throughout struggle or nationwide emergencies, on this case the COVID-19 pandemic.

Advertisement

Newest Updates

View 2 extra tales

“If it (the courtroom) signifies that it would not suppose the HEROES Act authority extends to mortgage forgiveness on this context, this is able to be a sign that the courtroom intends to constrain future functions of aggressive statutory interpretation by the Biden or successor administrations,” mentioned Andrew Rudalevige, a professor of presidency at Bowdoin Faculty in Maine.

Such an final result, Rudalevige added, may have severe penalties for primary governance in Washington.

“If Congress cannot or will not step up, and the courtroom will not let presidents achieve this, what are we left with? Governance by 5 justices doesn’t seem to be good authorities, both,” Rudalevige mentioned, referring to the variety of votes wanted to win a case on the Supreme Courtroom.

Presidents of each events have used government orders and different unilateral steps when Congress has did not act as they hoped – generally tiptoeing to the very edge, or maybe past that, of encroaching on legislative authority.

Advertisement

When Biden was vice chairman in 2014, then-President Barack Obama remarked that he may bypass congressional gridlock by his government authority, saying, “I’ve bought a pen, and I’ve bought a telephone.” Obama did so on immigration and different insurance policies.

Since then, the Supreme Courtroom has moved rightward, significantly since attaining a 6-3 conservative majority in 2020 with Republican President Donald Trump’s appointment of Justice Amy Coney Barrett.

The courtroom has repeatedly utilized to Biden insurance policies the so-called main questions doctrine, a judicial strategy that casts a skeptical eye towards far-reaching motion by federal businesses deemed missing clear congressional authorization.

Its conservative justices have already got invoked it to scuttle a pandemic-era residential eviction moratorium, a COVID-19 vaccination-or-testing mandate for giant companies and federal limits on carbon emissions from energy vegetation.

‘A GOOD LESSON’

Chief Justice John Roberts mentioned throughout Tuesday’s arguments that insurance policies involving some huge cash and producing loads of political controversy is likely to be “one thing for Congress to behave on.”

Advertisement

“And in the event that they have not acted on it, then perhaps that is a superb lesson to say for the president or the executive paperwork that perhaps that is not one thing they need to undertake on their very own,” Roberts mentioned.

Biden’s plan, introduced final August, would forgive as much as $10,000 in federal pupil debt for People making below $125,000 who took out loans to pay for faculty and different post-secondary training and $20,000 for recipients of Pell grants awarded to college students from lower-income households.

In some situations, like Biden’s unilateral effort to increase the eviction moratorium, he took government motion following congressional inaction. The identical dynamic was at play when his administration unveiled the debt forgiveness coverage, in keeping with David Lublin, a professor of presidency at American College in Washington.

“This system absolutely displays Democratic frustration with being unable to do that legislatively and the (authorized) challenges replicate Republican need to problem Democrats at each flip,” Lublin mentioned. “We’re in very polarized instances.”

Lublin mentioned the impression on Biden’s future agenda will rely on how the courtroom explains when a president’s administration exceeds its authority below a federal statute or the U.S. Structure.

Advertisement

For instance, Lublin mentioned, “If many related statutes have related statutory wording, broad or main administrative motion may come below problem.”

“Any of that is extra prone to have an effect on Democrats as a result of they’re extra prone to wish to have the federal government take aggressive motion by way of spending,” Lublin added.

Liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, a Biden appointee, raised related issues on Tuesday, highlighting a “big-picture” fear in regards to the courtroom making it too simple for folks to sue to cease authorities insurance policies they dislike.

“I am involved that we will have an issue when it comes to the federal authorities’s capability to function,” Jackson mentioned.

Reporting by John Kruzel and Andrew Chung in Washington; Enhancing by Will Dunham

Advertisement

Our Requirements: The Thomson Reuters Belief Rules.

Andrew Chung

Thomson Reuters

Reviews on the U.S. Supreme Courtroom and different authorized points. Awards embody 2021 Pulitzer Prize winner for a multi-part investigation into how the protection of certified immunity shields cops accused of extreme drive. Beforehand labored on the Toronto Star as a nationwide and worldwide correspondent.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Where Trump Gained and Harris Lost in New York

Published

on

Where Trump Gained and Harris Lost in New York

Where each candidate gained
or lost votes compared with the party’s 2020 candidate, by
borough

Donald J. Trump won 30 percent of the votes cast in New York City this month. It was a seven-point jump from his performance in 2020, and a higher share of the vote than any Republican nominee has won in the city since George H.W. Bush in 1988.

But his improved vote share was driven more by the votes Democrats lost than by the votes he gained.

How votes changed since 2020

In every neighborhood in New York City, from Red Hook in Brooklyn to Riverdale in the Bronx, Vice President Kamala Harris received markedly fewer votes than Joseph R. Biden, Jr. did in 2020, while in most neighborhoods, Mr. Trump notched modest increases compared with his last run.

The votes cast in New York City have not yet been certified, but more than 97 percent of them have been counted. That includes all ballots that were cast in person, both on Election Day and before, and a majority of absentee ballots, according to Vincent M. Ignizio, the deputy executive director of the city’s election board.

As it stands, the downturn in votes for the Democratic candidate was six times the size of Mr. Trump’s gains when compared with 2020. In some boroughs, the ratio was even larger.

Change in vote by borough, compared with 2020

Advertisement
All of New York City

−573,600

+94,600

Queens

−164,900

+35,400

Brooklyn

−151,700

Advertisement

+16,600

Manhattan

−120,900

+17,900

Bronx

−111,000

+23,800

Advertisement
Staten Island

−25,100

+900

Many New Yorkers moved out of the city during the pandemic, and by the 2022 midterms, the total number of registered voters here had already started to drop. As of this month, there were about 230,000 fewer active registered Democrats in the city than there were in 2020, and about 12,000 more registered Republicans.

It is not clear how much that contributed to the outcome of the election, but the pattern of Democratic losses and Republican gains was clear across all income levels and ethnic groups in the city. The drop-off was most pronounced among working-class immigrant groups who live outside Manhattan, many of them in the neighborhoods that were hit the hardest by the pandemic and the economic disruption that followed.

The neighborhood where Democratic turnout dropped the most in terms of percentage change was Borough Park, an Orthodox Jewish enclave in Brooklyn that voted overwhelmingly for Mr. Trump. While support for Mr. Trump increased only slightly, from about 22,200 votes in 2020 to 22,700 in 2024, turnout for the Democratic candidate dropped 46 percent, from about 7,600 votes in 2020 to about 4,100 in 2024.

Advertisement

Where Democratic support declined the most

Percentage change in votes compared with 2020

Borough Park, Brooklyn

−46%

+2%

Woodhaven, Queens

−42%

Advertisement

+46%

Bensonhurst, Brooklyn

−40%

+12%

Corona, Queens

−40%

+57%

Advertisement
Richmond Hill, Queens

−39%

+35%

Ocean Parkway, Brooklyn

−39%

+1%

Elmhurst, Queens

−38%

Advertisement

+30%

Gravesend, Brooklyn

−37%

+13%

Flushing, Queens

−36%

+11%

Advertisement
Dyker Heights, Brooklyn

−36%

+9%

Morrisania, Bronx

−36%

+62%

East Tremont, Bronx

−36%

Advertisement

+57%

East Harlem, Manhattan

−36%

+26%

South Richmond Hill, Queens

−36%

+49%

Advertisement
Concourse, Bronx

−35%

+58%

Note: Data includes neighborhoods that had 10,000 votes or more in 2024.

Among income groups in the city, the precincts with the lowest median incomes saw a the largest drop in support for the Democratic candidate, and the largest increase in support for Mr. Trump.

Advertisement

Percentage change in votes compared with 2020

Lowest income

−32%

+24%

Middle income

−26%

+12%

Advertisement
Highest income

−17%

+7%

Note: The lowest income areas have a median income in the bottom 25 percent of all precincts; middle income areas have a median income in the middle 50 percent of all precincts; and highest income areas have a median income in the top 25 percent of all precincts.

Ms. Harris lost substantial support in precincts with larger populations of Latino and Asian voters. Asian voters have been shifting rightward in recent years because of a mix of concerns about crime, city education policies and the economy.

Advertisement

Mr. Trump made significant gains in precincts where a majority of residents were Latino or Black.

Percentage change in votes compared with 2020

45% Asian

−37%

+19%

70% Hispanic

−37%

Advertisement

+55%

70% Black

−21%

+46%

90% white

−18%

−2%

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Northvolt chief resigns a day after battery maker collapses into bankruptcy

Published

on

Northvolt chief resigns a day after battery maker collapses into bankruptcy

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Northvolt’s chief executive has resigned a day after Europe’s big battery hope filed for bankruptcy in the US.

Peter Carlsson took responsibility for the dramatic collapse during a town-hall meeting with employees on Friday morning, the Stockholm-based company said.

Northvolt was Europe’s best-funded start-up, having raised more than $15bn from investors and governments, but was left with just $30mn in cash — enough to operate for a week — before its bankruptcy filing under US Chapter 11 rules that gives it protection from creditors.

Advertisement

“The Chapter 11 filing allows a period during which the company can be reorganised, ramp up operations while honouring customer and supplier commitments, and ultimately position itself for the long term. That makes it a good time for me to hand over to the next generation of leaders,” Carlsson said.

He later told reporters that Northvolt needed about $1bn-$1.2bn to be able to continue as a going concern after Chapter 11.

The former Tesla executive founded Northvolt in 2016 and positioned it as Europe’s answer to the growing dominance of Asian players in battery manufacturing such as China’s CATL and BYD, Japan’s Panasonic and South Korea’s LG and Samsung.

Northvolt gathered more than $50bn in orders from automotive groups such as Volkswagen, BMW, Scania and Porsche as well as billions more in capital from the same groups and from financial investors including Goldman Sachs and BlackRock.

But it said late on Thursday that it was filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the US with $5.8bn in debts, so that it could access $145mn in cash and $100mn in fresh financing from truckmaker Scania. It is now looking for one or more investors to provide it with future financing to exit Chapter 11.

Advertisement

Current and former employees have told the Financial Times that the fall of Northvolt was due to a litany of issues, from mismanagement and overspending to poor safety standards and over-reliance on Chinese machinery.

Several investors had privately urged Carlsson to resign to take responsibility for Northvolt’s dramatic fall from grace.

Speaking to reporters on Friday about what went wrong, Carlsson said: “I should have pulled the brakes earlier on the expansion path to make sure the core engine was moving according to plan.” He also said there had been “gravel in the machinery”.

VW, Northvolt’s biggest current shareholder with a 21 per cent stake, had told the start-up that “they’re not able to continue capitalising us”, Carlsson continued. But he also said that the company had received strong support from Scania, Porsche and Audi, which are all part of the VW group.

Northvolt has struggled to ramp up production at its sole factory in Skellefteå, just below the Arctic Circle in northern Sweden.

Advertisement

Its plans for factories in Germany and Canada remain unaffected by Chapter 11 as they have received significant subsidies from the respective governments.

“We are incredibly thankful to Peter for his vision and dedication to building Northvolt from an unprecedented idea to becoming Europe’s battery manufacturing champion,” said Tom Johnstone, Northvolt’s interim chair.

The company will begin searching for a new chief executive immediately.

Its present leadership consists of Pia Aaltonen-Forsell, chief financial officer; Matthias Arleth, a former VW executive who is now head of cells and who will also take the role of chief operations officer; and Scott Millar, an executive at Teneo who has become chief restructuring officer.

Carlsson, currently one of Northvolt’s largest shareholders, will remain on the company’s board and as a senior adviser.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

You can sword-fight at this club. But no politics allowed

Published

on

You can sword-fight at this club. But no politics allowed

Gaia Ferrency, 17, of Swissvale, Pa., waits to participate in a long-sword tournament as part of Friday Night Fights, hosted by Pittsburgh Sword Fighters, on Oct. 4 at a former Catholic church northeast of Pittsburgh.

Justin Merriman for NPR/‎


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Justin Merriman for NPR/‎

Over the last few years and through this year’s contentious campaign season, which was rooted in America’s deep divisions, there has been a coarsening in the way people talk to each other. We wanted to explore how some are trying to bridge divides. We asked our reporters across the NPR Network to look for examples of people working through their differences. We’re sharing those stories in our series Seeking Common Ground.

CREIGHTON, Pa. — With their faces hidden behind hard black masks, two fighters stand a few feet apart and raise their swords.

They step forward and clank the broad, dull metal blades against each other repeatedly. One fighter strikes the other in the chest. The fight is over, and a small crowd applauds.

Advertisement

Inside this former Catholic church northeast of Pittsburgh, under a 25-foot ceiling flanked by Gothic, pointed-arch windows, members of the Pittsburgh Sword Fighters club and school gather.

In this photo, two sword fighters, wearing all black and protective gear, fight against one another with long metal swords. In the background, audience members watch them compete in the tournament.

The audience cheers on two sword fighters as they take part in a long-sword tournament hosted by Pittsburgh Sword Fighters.

Justin Merriman for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Justin Merriman for NPR

It’s a tournament — as well as a party — billed as Friday Night Fights.

There are plenty of rules in a sword fight. But there’s one rule that applies after the fighters have put down their weapons: no talk of politics.

The evolution of the rule started around 2016, when club owner Josh Parise says he was getting fed up with the rancor of political discourse in the U.S. — personal attacks were on the rise, even within families, as was cancel culture.

Advertisement

“I couldn’t tolerate the lack of decency between human beings,” says Parise, whose club focuses on historical European martial arts.

“None of it made sense anymore,” he says.

This photo is a portrait of Josh Parise. The photo shows him from the waist up, and he's wearing a gray shirt with an unbuttoned horizontal-striped shirt on top of it.

Josh Parise, 48, of Oakmont, Pa., is the owner of Pittsburgh Sword Fighters.

Justin Merriman for NPR


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Justin Merriman for NPR

And then there were a few would-be sword fighters who came to the club and didn’t treat others well. Parise had to tell them to get on their horses and leave.

“It’s infuriating to me, so with this place, we just don’t allow that to happen,” Parise says.

Advertisement

Leaving their politics at the door

As club volunteer Kat Licause watches the matches, she says the directive to avoid politics has led to closer relationships in the club.

“I don’t think we avoid it in the sense that we’re running scared of big questions and topics,” says Licause, who works as a tech writer. “I think we just have this mutual understanding here that if any of us was ever in trouble, we would pick each other up, like immediately.”

The club space is outfitted with medieval and Gothic touches, like coats of arms, a three-eyed raven sculpture and faux stonework that Parise made himself.

Chuck Gross stands in the doorway of the former Catholic church. He's wearing a dark tank top and has a long beard. Taxidermic animals with antlers are mounted on the wall above and around him. A teenage girl or young woman is to the left of him in the doorway.

Chuck Gross, one of the head long-sword instructors at Pittsburgh Sword Fighters, stands in the doorway of the former Catholic church where a long-sword tournament will take place.

Justin Merriman for NPR


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Justin Merriman for NPR

Against the far wall, a custom Dumbledore throne sits on a fake altar. Off to the sides, there’s a table for potluck dishes and an open bar. The crowd and the vibe are noticeably chill, considering the main activity.

Advertisement

“You walk up, you acknowledge one another, and then you hit each other with big metal sticks,” Parise says with a wry smile.

But divisive political rhetoric, which can be sharper than the swords here, must be left at the club’s big wooden door. The politics ban doesn’t rise to the level of, say, a 15th-century heresy law, but it’s there.

Parise says his students and club members run the gamut politically, from religious conservatives to progressives. He loves to see them find common ground.

“I just don’t want people to feel uncomfortable, but I also don’t want them to bring their baggage with them,” he says. “Leave it outside and just do the thing.”

Teaching and learning from fellow fighters

As the tournament gets underway, a judge briefs the fighters and urges them to play by the rules and stay under control, lest he “red-card” them.

Advertisement
In this photo, Todd Rooney stands while holding a long metal sword. He's wearing a black protective sword-fighting outfit that has a skull patch on one sleeve.

Todd Rooney, a high school English teacher, is photographed on Oct. 4. Rooney is a competitor in the long-sword tournament.

Justin Merriman for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Justin Merriman for NPR

Advertisement

“These are teachable moments,” the judge says. “We fight at Friday Night Fights to learn and help each other.”

More fighters line up. Among them is high school English teacher and long-sword instructor Todd Rooney.

He’s holding his headgear, waiting for his name to be called to fight. Rooney has been a member of the sword fighters’ club for almost 10 years and appreciates the politics-free zone.

“Because that rule exists here, I get to work with, spar with, teach, learn from people from all different walks of life, all different political affiliations, religious groups,” Rooney says.

Advertisement

And the controlled conflict of a sword fight, he says, brings about a kind of clarity.

“We have to encounter each other as fully human — we have to respect each other,” he says. “And it’s especially important here, when we’re coming at each other with weapons.”

In this photo, nine men and one woman are congregated around the steps of the former church where the sword fights are held. They are wearing casual clothes. Some are sitting or standing on the steps, while a few are standing in front of the steps.

Members gather on the steps of the former Catholic church where Pittsburgh Sword Fighters hosts a Friday Night Fights long-sword tournament.

Justin Merriman for NPR


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Justin Merriman for NPR

Continue Reading

Trending