News
U.S. House rejects aviation safety bill after Pentagon abruptly withdraws support
Family members of the people who were killed in the midair collision near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport listen during a news conference ahead of a vote on an aviation safety bill on Capitol Hill on Tuesday in Washington.
Mariam Zuhaib/AP
hide caption
toggle caption
Mariam Zuhaib/AP
WASHINGTON — The House of Representatives narrowly rejected an aviation safety bill that was spurred by the deadly midair collision near Washington, D.C. on Tuesday, one day after the Pentagon abruptly withdrew its support for the bipartisan bill.

The ROTOR Act, as the bill is known, would require wider use of a safety system known as ADS-B in and ADS-B out which can transmit an aircraft’s location to other aircraft. It would also limit exemptions for military helicopters.
The Senate approved the bill unanimously in December. It also had wide support from families of the crash victims, many of whom had traveled to Capitol Hill for the vote.
But the Pentagon has reservations.
After supporting the ROTOR Act last year, Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement on Monday that the bill could create “unresolved budgetary burdens and operational security risks,” though he did not specify what they are.
Under House rules, a two-thirds majority was required for passage. The final tally was 264 in favor and 133 opposed, with more than 130 Republicans voting against it.
The National Transportation Safety Board said ADS-B technology could have prevented the midair collision of a U.S. Army Black Hawk helicopter and an American Airlines passenger jet that killed 67 people last year by giving pilots more time to react and avoid the crash.
“The ROTOR Act would’ve saved lives,” NTSB chair Jennifer Homendy said on social media before the vote. “How many more people need to die before we act?”
But the bill ran into headwinds in the House from several powerful Republican committee leaders.
An American Airlines jet takes off from the Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport on January 29, 2026, on the first anniversary of the day 67 people died after a U.S. Army Black Hawk helicopter collided with a commuter jet over the Potomac River.
Tom Brenner/Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Tom Brenner/Getty Images
“This bill will undermine our national security,” said Mike Rogers, R-Ala., the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee in remarks Monday evening. “Requiring our fighters and bombers and highly classified assets to regularly broadcast their location puts our men and women in uniform at risk.”
Sam Graves, R-Mo., the chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, described the ROTOR Act as an “unworkable government mandate,” and raised concerns that it would be “burdensome” to some pilots.
Graves and Rogers put their support behind their own bipartisan bill, known as the ALERT Act, setting up a possible clash between powerful GOP lawmakers in the House and Senate.
But the House bill does not have the endorsement of the NTSB, aviation industry trade unions, or the families of the crash victims. After the vote, many of those victims’ families said they would continue to push for the ROTOR Act’s passage.

“We are devastated. Today, a majority of the House voted to pass the ROTOR Act. It was not enough,” a statement from the Families of Flight 5342 read. “We call on House leadership to bring the ROTOR Act back for a vote that lets the majority pass it.”
The bill’s co-author, Ted Cruz, R-Texas, the chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, also vowed to keep up the pressure.
“Only the ROTOR Act ensures that all airplanes and helicopters flying in U.S. airspace play by the same set of rules,” Cruz said in a statement after the vote. “Today’s result was just a temporary delay. We will succeed, and [the] ROTOR Act will become the law of the land. The families and the flying public deserve nothing less.”
News
State Department Will Revoke Passports of Parents Who Owe Child Support
The Trump administration said it would start revoking the passports of Americans who owe more than $2,500 in child support payments, seeking to enforce a decades-old federal law.
President Bill Clinton signed the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act in 1996, a law that enacted significant changes to the federal social safety net. Among those changes was a provision that the State Department be notified of people with delinquent child support debts. It said that the secretary of state “may revoke, restrict, or limit a passport issued previously to such individual.”
In a statement, the State Department said that the agency “is using common sense tools to support American families and strengthen compliance with U.S. laws,” adding that revoking passports “supports the welfare of American children by exacting real consequences for child support delinquency under existing federal law.”
It is unclear how many citizens could have their passports revoked under the policy, or when enforcement would start. The State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The Clinton-era law has not been strictly enforced in the past, and enforcement has usually been focused on blocking those with child support debt from renewing or applying for a new passport.
In the 1998 case of Eudene Eunique, for example, Ms. Eunique was denied a passport after the Department of Health and Human Services reported to the State Department that she owed more than $20,000 in child support payments to her ex-husband. Ms. Eunique sued in federal court, arguing that the law violated her Fifth Amendment right to travel. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ultimately ruled against her and upheld the law in 2002.
The State Department has estimated that the passport rule has led to the collection of more than $382 million in child support payments since its inception. The agency also reported that it was tracking 4.3 million people with outstanding child support debt, and that nearly 100 passport applications are denied every day over child support.
There have been several legislative efforts to tighten enforcement of the passport rule. A 2005 law lowered the threshold for enforcement from $5,000 in unpaid child support to $2,500. Another bill in 2007 sought to make the passport revocation mandatory, rather than at the discretion of the State Department, but that never passed.
News
U.S. military says it intercepted Iranian attacks on 3 Navy ships in Strait of Hormuz
Children play in the water along the shore as a mix of bulk carriers, cargo ships, and service vessels sit offshore in the Strait of Hormuz off Bandar Abbas, Iran, Sunday.
Razieh Poudat/ISNA/AP
hide caption
toggle caption
Razieh Poudat/ISNA/AP
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — The U.S. military said it intercepted Iranian attacks on three Navy ships in the Strait of Hormuz and “targeted Iranian military facilities responsible for attacking U.S. forces,” highlighting the fragility of the month-old ceasefire between the two countries.

U.S. Central Command said in a social media post that U.S. forces intercepted “unprovoked Iranian attacks” and responded with self-defense strikes.
The U.S. military said no ships were hit. It said it doesn’t seek escalation but “remains positioned and ready to protect American forces.”
Meanwhile, Iranian state media said the country’s armed forces exchanged fire with “the enemy” on Qeshm Island in the strait. It is the largest Iranian island in the Persian Gulf, home to about 150,000 people. It also houses a water desalination plant.
Iranian state media also reported loud noises and defensive fire in western Tehran. In southern Iran, explosions were heard near Bandar Abbas, semiofficial Iranian news agencies Fars and Tasnim said. The reports did not identify the source of the blasts.
Earlier in the day, a shipping data company reported that Iran has created a government agency to vet and tax vessels seeking passage through the crucial Strait of Hormuz.
The Iranian effort to formalize control over the channel raised new concerns about international shipping, with hundreds of commercial vessels bottled up in the Persian Gulf and unable to reach the open sea. Still, hope that the two-month conflict could soon be over buoyed international markets.
U.S. administration has sent mixed messages
The ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran has largely held since April 8. In-person talks between the two countries, hosted by Pakistan last month, failed to reach an agreement to end the war that began Feb. 28 when the U.S. and Israel launched strikes against Iran.
Earlier Thursday, Tehran said it was examining the latest U.S. proposals for ending the war.
Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said the Islamic Republic was reviewing messages from Pakistan, which is mediating peace negotiations, but Iran “has not yet reached a conclusion, and no response has been given to the U.S. side,” Iranian state TV reported.
At the Vatican, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio discussed Middle East peace efforts with Pope Leo XIV, whose opposition to the Iran war has led to open sparring with President Donald Trump.
The Trump administration has sent mixed messages on its strategy to end the war. The tenuous ceasefire and previous declarations that military operations were over have given way to new threats of bombing if Tehran does not accept a deal that allows for resumption of oil and natural gas shipments disrupted by the conflict.
Trump reiterated those after Thursday’s exchange of fire.
“Just like we knocked them out again today, we’ll knock them out a lot harder, and a lot more violently, in the future, if they don’t get their Deal signed, FAST!” Trump said in a social media post.
Earlier this week, Trump suspended an attempt by the U.S. military to open a safe passage for commercial ships through the strait, saying the pause would allow more time to reach a peace agreement. An official in Saudi Arabia said Thursday that the key U.S. ally refused to support Trump’s effort to reopen the strait by force.

Pakistan says it expects a deal soon
Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar spoke by phone Thursday with his Iranian counterpart, Abbas Araghchi, the Pakistani Foreign Ministry said.
“We expect an agreement sooner rather than later,” Pakistani Foreign Ministry spokesperson Tahir Andrabi said. “We hope the parties will reach a peaceful and sustainable solution that will contribute not only to peace in our region but to international peace as well.”
He declined to give a timeline.
Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, speaking in televised remarks, said Islamabad remained in “continuous contact with Iran and the United States, day and night, to stop the war and extend the ceasefire.”
Meanwhile, direct talks between Israel and Lebanon were scheduled to resume next week in Washington, according to a U.S. official speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss plans for the closed-door meetings. The official said talks will be held May 14 and 15.
Iran creates agency to control passage at Hormuz
The report by shipping data firm Lloyd’s List Intelligence that Iran has established a new government agency to approve transit and collect tolls from shipping in the strait raised concerns over the freedom of navigation on which global trade depends.
The agency, called the Persian Gulf Strait Authority, is “positioning itself as the only valid authority to grant permission to ships transiting the strait,” Lloyd’s reported in an online briefing Thursday. Lloyd’s said the authority had emailed it an application form for ships seeking passage.
Iran has effectively closed the strait, a vital waterway for the shipment of oil, gas, fertilizer and other petroleum products, while the U.S. is blockading Iranian ports. The disruptions have sent fuel prices skyrocketing and rattled the global economy.
The new Iranian agency formalizes an existing, albeit murky, vetting lane that takes vessels through the strait’s northern waters near the Iranian coastline. Iran controls which ships pass and, for at least some vessels, imposes a tax on their cargo.
Maritime law experts say Iran’s demands to vet or tax vessels violate international law. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea calls for countries to permit peaceful passage through their territorial waters.
The U.S. and its Gulf allies are pushing for the U.N. Security Council to support a resolution that condemns Iran’s chokehold on the strait and threatens sanctions. A prior resolution calling for reopening the strait was vetoed by Iran allies Russia and China.
Iran’s president reports lengthy meeting with new supreme leader
Top Iranian officials have said Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei is playing a key role in overseeing negotiations with the U.S. But he remains in hiding and has not appeared in public since he was wounded early in the war.
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said he met recently for more than two hours with Khamenei. In remarks aired Thursday on Iranian state television, Pezeshkian praised the supreme leader’s “sincere” behavior in what he said was a long in-person meeting.
Khamenei has only released a series of written statements since being named supreme leader in March, replacing his father, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed during the war’s initial strikes.
Saudi official says kingdom did not support U.S. effort to reopen strait
Trump did not consult with U.S. ally Saudi Arabia before launching the short-lived effort to force open a shipping passage through the strait, according to a Saudi official who was not authorized to discuss the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.
“We told them that we are not part of this and that they can’t use our territories and bases for this,” the official said Thursday.
The official said Saudi Arabia sent a message to Iran that the kingdom would not be involved in U.S. attacks related to Trump’s attempt to reopen the strait.
Trump suspended the effort, dubbed Project Freedom, during its second day Tuesday. Only two American-flagged merchant ships are known to have passed through the U.S.-guarded route. The U.S. military said it sank six Iranian small boats threatening civilian ships.
News
Video: Why Trump’s Feud With the Pope Worries Republicans
new video loaded: Why Trump’s Feud With the Pope Worries Republicans

By Lisa Lerer, Alexandra Ostasiewicz, Nikolay Nikolov, Edward Vega and Rafaela Balster
May 7, 2026
-
Detroit, MI23 minutes agoApproval poll: Do you approve of Lions GM Brad Holmes? (post-2026 draft)
-
San Francisco, CA35 minutes agoWhere to watch Pittsburgh Pirates vs San Francisco Giants: TV channel, start time, streaming for May 8
-
Dallas, TX41 minutes agoDallas Weather: Thunderstorms in the forecast for Friday & Mother’s Day
-
Boston, MA53 minutes agoWhere to watch Tampa Bay Rays vs Boston Red Sox: TV channel, start time, streaming for May 8
-
Denver, CO59 minutes ago11 Denver Restaurants For Anyone Missing Their Southern Roots – Tasting Table
-
Seattle, WA1 hour agoOffseason Checklist: Seattle Kraken
-
San Diego, CA1 hour agoSan Diego Padres celebrate Puerto Rican heritage with local artist
-
Milwaukee, WI1 hour ago
Food trucks in Milwaukee brace for new curfew