Connect with us

News

Trump to fly to New York for court surrender amid tight security

Published

on

Trump to fly to New York for court surrender amid tight security

NEW YORK/PALM BEACH, Florida, April 3 (Reuters) – Former U.S. President Donald Trump is about to fly from Florida to New York Metropolis on Monday, forward of his scheduled arraignment associated to hush cash paid to a porn star earlier than the 2016 election, as safety tightens in Manhattan.

Trump, the primary former U.S. president to face prison costs, is because of be arraigned, fingerprinted and photographed on the downtown Manhattan courthouse on Tuesday. His attorneys have mentioned he’ll enter a plea of not responsible.

The precise costs included within the grand jury indictment haven’t been disclosed; Tuesday’s arraignment marks Trump’s first look in courtroom and in entrance of a decide within the case.

The Republican businessman-turned-politician plans to journey from his Mar-a-Lago property in Palm Seashore noon on Monday, arriving later within the day in New York and spending the night time at Trump Tower in Manhattan earlier than arriving on the courthouse on Tuesday morning, an adviser mentioned.

A courtroom official mentioned the arraignment is deliberate for two:15 p.m. (1815 GMT) on Tuesday. Trump then will return to Florida and ship remarks at Mar-a-Lago at 8:15 p.m. on Tuesday (0015 GMT on Wednesday), his workplace mentioned.

Advertisement

New York police in the course of the weekend started erecting barricades alongside the sting of the sidewalks round Trump Tower and the Manhattan Prison Court docket constructing downtown, and another courtrooms shall be cleared.

Demonstrations are anticipated at these websites and police vowed to be ready. “Officers have been positioned on alert and the division stays prepared to reply as wanted and can guarantee everybody is ready to peacefully train their rights,” the New York Police Division mentioned in a press release.

Different courtrooms on the courthouse’s increased flooring shall be shut down forward of the arraignment as a part of the safety precautions, a courtroom official mentioned.

U.S. Consultant Marjorie Taylor Greene tweeted an invite on Sunday to hitch her at a protest close to the courthouse on Tuesday, saying “They’re not coming after President Trump, they’re coming after us, he’s simply of their manner.”

TRUMP LAWYERS HOPE TO DISMISS

Earlier than the indictment, the grand jury heard proof a few $130,000 fee to grownup movie actress Stormy Daniels within the waning days of the 2016 presidential marketing campaign. Daniels has mentioned she was paid to maintain silent a few sexual encounter she had with Trump at a Lake Tahoe resort in 2006. Trump denies the affair.

Advertisement

Trump, 76, served as president from 2017 to 2021 and in November launched a bid to regain the presidency in 2024, aiming to disclaim Democratic President Joe Biden a second time period in workplace.

Phrase of the indictment, arising from an investigation led by Manhattan’s Democratic district legal professional, Alvin Bragg, surfaced final Thursday. Trump has referred to as himself harmless and he and his allies have portrayed the costs as politically motivated.

Joe Tacopina, a Trump lawyer, mentioned on Sunday he expects extra particulars surrounding the arraignment to be resolved on Monday and famous that the Secret Service, which protects former presidents, additionally has a job to play on Tuesday. Tacopina mentioned it was unlikely there shall be a “perp stroll” – perp being shorthand for perpetrator – wherein a person who has been charged is paraded in entrance of the information media, due to safety issues.

Tacopina added that Trump’s attorneys will “dissect” the indictment as soon as it’s made public and can have a look at “each potential concern” to problem, including that he anticipates in some unspecified time in the future making a movement to dismiss the costs.

“I truthfully do not understand how that is going to go – hopefully as easily as potential – after which we start the battle to proper this fallacious,” Tacopina instructed CNN’s “State of the Union” program, talking concerning the arraignment.

Advertisement

Trump is predicted to seem earlier than Justice Juan Merchan, the decide who additionally presided over a prison trial final 12 months wherein Trump’s actual property firm was convicted of tax fraud. Trump himself was not charged in that case.

A courtroom official mentioned on Sunday that the decide has requested each side to submit their positions on whether or not cameras and video ought to be allowed within the courtroom and can determine on the problem on Monday.

Reporting by Wealthy McKay in Palm Seashore, Florida and Karen Freifeld in New York; Extra reporting by Jonathan Allen, Jeenah Moon and David Dee Delgado in New York
Writing by Will Dunham
Modifying by Heather Timmons and Matthew Lewis

Our Requirements: The Thomson Reuters Belief Ideas.

Advertisement

News

Minneapolis Promises Police Overhaul in Deal With Justice Department

Published

on

Minneapolis Promises Police Overhaul in Deal With Justice Department

The Minneapolis City Council unanimously voted on Monday to overhaul its police department to address a pattern of systemic abuses, as part of an agreement with the Department of Justice.

Lawyers from the Department of Justice and the city, where George Floyd was killed in 2020 by a police officer, have raced in recent weeks to finalize terms of the deal, known as a consent decree, before President-elect Donald J. Trump takes office. The previous Trump administration opposed the use of consent decrees, and the fate of nearly a dozen other federal investigations into American police departments is uncertain.

Under the deal approved on Monday, the Minneapolis department promised to closely track and investigate allegations of police misconduct, rein in the use of force, and improve officer training.

“This agreement reflects what our community has asked for and what we know is necessary: real accountability and meaningful change,” Mayor Jacob Frey of Minneapolis said in a statement.

Federal oversight, the strongest tool available to overhaul police departments with histories of abuse, begins with an exhaustive civil rights investigation and a report of findings. Cities then usually agree to negotiate a consent decree, a court-enforced oversight agreement, in order to avoid a federal lawsuit.

Advertisement

The Minneapolis decree was set in motion in the summer of 2023 after the Department of Justice issued a report accusing the city’s police department of routinely discriminating against Black and Native American residents, of needlessly using deadly force and of violating the First Amendment rights of protesters and journalists. The Minneapolis police union did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

City officials and lawyers from the Justice Department said they intended to present the deal to a federal judge, who will be responsible for overseeing its implementation.

During Mr. Trump’s first term in the White House, the Justice Department rejected such decrees, coming out in opposition to deals in Chicago and Baltimore and refraining from entering new ones. More recently, during a campaign rally last year, Mr. Trump said that in order to crack down on crime, the police should be allowed to be “extraordinarily rough,” and he spoke about the possibility of letting officers loose from constraints during “one really violent day.”

Officials in Minneapolis said they would remain committed to lasting change in the city’s police department, even if the Trump administration were to walk away from federal consent decrees. Several months before the Department of Justice report was issued, the city agreed to a policing overhaul as part of an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights.

Minneapolis set aside $27 million in its 2024 and 2025 budgets to pay for changes in response to the state and federal investigations. The city also paid $27 million to Mr. Floyd’s family in 2021 to settle their wrongful death lawsuit.

Advertisement

Consent decrees were pursued aggressively under President Barack Obama, whose administration entered into 15 of the decrees in a time of a growing public outcry over police abuses.

After Mr. Trump’s administration steered away from such decrees, the Justice Department under the Biden administration sought to bring them back, launching a dozen civil rights investigations into police departments.

But the Biden administration has been slow to bring those efforts to a resolution, in some cases letting years elapse. The Justice Department’s civil rights division has released a flurry of investigative findings in recent weeks, covering cities like Memphis, where the department found excessive force and racial discrimination; Mount Vernon, N.Y., where it found illegal arrests and strip searches; and Oklahoma City, where it found chronic mistreatment of people with behavioral disabilities by the police.

Some cities, like Memphis and Phoenix, which was the subject of an investigation after an extraordinarily high number of shootings by the police, have balked at entering into oversight agreements. The agreements usually call for changes in a number of aspects of a police department’s operations, training, policies and discipline, and can take a decade to complete.

The Biden administration is currently enforcing 15 consent decrees reached under previous administrations, but has completed only one other new one besides Minneapolis, in Louisville, Ky.

Advertisement

Those agreements and the department’s remaining investigations will be handed over to the Trump administration.

Devlin Barrett contributed reporting.

Continue Reading

News

Michael Barr to step down as Federal Reserve’s top Wall Street regulator

Published

on

Michael Barr to step down as Federal Reserve’s top Wall Street regulator

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Michael Barr is stepping down as Wall Street’s top regulator but will stay on as a governor at the Federal Reserve, the US central bank announced on Monday.

Barr will vacate his role as vice-chair for supervision at the end of February, cutting short a four-year term that began in July 2022. He will remain as a governor until that term is up in January 2032, meaning there will be no new vacancy on the seven-member board of governors.

Barr said in a statement that he was stepping down over concerns that a “risk of a dispute over the position could be a distraction” to the Fed’s goal to safeguard the US financial system.

Advertisement

“In the current environment, I’ve determined that I would be more effective in serving the American people from my role as governor,” he said.

His decision comes just ahead of Donald Trump’s return to the White House. The president-elect has vowed to slash regulations in his second term, and his advisers were reportedly considering demoting Barr, although the transition team had not asked him to resign.

Barr’s move averts a potentially messy battle between Trump and the central bank if the president-elect had sought to force him aside after retaking office. The board’s general counsel believed that Barr would have prevailed if the issue were raised in litigation. His private counsel noted that fighting such a case would have been disruptive for the institution.

“It’s not about the legal merits, it’s about practically what it would mean for the Fed in that period of time,” Barr said in an interview with the Financial Times. “It just made sense to me to get in front of all of that and take myself out of the equation.”

Since Barr is staying on as a Fed governor, Trump will have to select a new vice-chair for supervision from among the current group of governors. They include officials such as Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, both of who Trump selected for their jobs during his first term as president. Bowman, in particular, has emerged in recent years as a staunch opponent to many of the rule changes proposed by Barr — making her a potential choice for the job by the president-elect.

Advertisement

The Fed on Monday said it would not make any “major rulemakings” until a successor is confirmed by the Senate.

Since Barr assumed the top regulatory role in the US government and pledged to impose more stringent rules on major lenders, the Fed has faced intense legal pressure from banking lobby groups. Some of those groups filed a lawsuit in December against the central bank over its framework for stress tests, which aim to identify vulnerabilities at specific organisations in times of economic or financial strain.

The Fed was already considering what it described as “significant changes” to the stress tests in order to reduce volatility around the results and make the process more transparent. Changes could include amending models that calculate hypothetical losses for banks, averaging results over two years to lessen the risk of large year-on-year swings, and allowing the public to comment on hypothetical scenarios each year before they are finalised.

Last year, Barr was forced to revise his landmark proposal to raise capital requirements on lenders such as JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs. A bipartisan group of US lawmakers, chief executives at the biggest banks and lobbyists had launched a ferocious opposition campaign against the implementation of the so-called Basel III Endgame — the final rules tied to an international effort to shore up the sector in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.

In September, Barr unveiled proposals that would have roughly halved the increase in capital requirements to 9 per cent for the largest US banks, versus the 19 per cent initially floated.

Advertisement

Asked about the fate of the Basel rules, Barr said he was “hopeful that the process continues to move forward”.

Republicans cheered Barr’s decision to step down. Tim Scott, the head of the powerful Senate Committee on Banking, which oversees the Fed, said Barr had “failed to meet the responsibilities of his position”.

“I stand ready to work with President Trump to ensure we have responsible financial regulators at the helm,” Scott said in a statement.

Congressman French Hill from Arkansas, who chairs the House Financial Services Committee, said he was “pleased” to hear of Barr’s resignation.

“It’s my preference that his nominee is committed to tailoring bank regulatory policies and implementing a balanced approach to prudential supervision,” he added.

Advertisement

Ian Katz at Capital Alpha Partners said Barr’s resignation set the stage for “lighter touch” oversight from the Fed. Bowman was the “most obvious candidate for the job if she wants it”, he added.

Barr said in his resignation letter to President Joe Biden that it had been an “honour and a privilege to serve as the Federal Reserve board’s vice-chair for supervision, and to work with colleagues to help maintain the stability and strength of the US financial system so that it can meet the needs of American families and businesses”.

Continue Reading

News

‘America’s democracy stood’: Kamala Harris speaks after Congress certifies Trump win – video

Published

on

‘America’s democracy stood’: Kamala Harris speaks after Congress certifies Trump win – video

Kamala Harris said she was simply doing her constitutional duty in presiding over the certification of her presidential election defeat by Donald Trump on Monday. The certification was over quickly after no Democrats rose to object the results from any state – in contrast with four years ago when dozens of Republican lawmakers formally disputed Joe Biden’s victory in key swing states

Continue Reading

Trending