Connect with us

News

Trump Orders U.S. Strikes Against Houthi Militant Sites in Yemen

Published

on

Trump Orders U.S. Strikes Against Houthi Militant Sites in Yemen

The United States carried out large-scale military strikes on Saturday against dozens of targets in Yemen controlled by the Iranian-backed Houthi militia, President Trump announced.

It was the opening salvo in what senior American officials said was a new offensive against the militants and a strong message to Iran, as Mr. Trump seeks a nuclear deal with its government.

Air and naval strikes ordered by Mr. Trump hit radars, air defenses, and missile and drone systems in an effort to open international shipping lanes in the Red Sea that the Houthis have disrupted for months with their own attacks. At least one senior Houthi commander was targeted. The Biden administration conducted several strikes against the Houthis but largely failed to restore stability to the region.

U.S. officials said the bombardment, the most significant military action of Mr. Trump’s second term so far, was also meant to send a warning signal to Iran. Mr. Trump wants to broker a deal with Iran to prevent it from acquiring a nuclear weapon, but has left open the possibility of military action if the Iranians rebuff negotiations.

“Today, I have ordered the United States Military to launch decisive and powerful Military action against the Houthi terrorists in Yemen,” Mr. Trump said in a message on Truth Social. “They have waged an unrelenting campaign of piracy, violence, and terrorism against American, and other, ships, aircraft, and drones.”

Advertisement

Mr. Trump then pivoted to Iran’s rulers in Tehran: “To Iran: Support for the Houthi terrorists must end IMMEDIATELY! Do NOT threaten the American People, their President, who has received one of the largest mandates in Presidential History, or Worldwide shipping lanes. If you do, BEWARE, because America will hold you fully accountable.”

U.S. officials said that airstrikes against the Houthis’ arsenal, much of which is buried deep underground, could last for several weeks, intensifying in scope and scale depending on the militants’ reaction. U.S. intelligence agencies have struggled in the past to identify and locate the Houthi weapons systems, which the rebels produce in subterranean factories and smuggle in from Iran.

Some national security aides want to pursue an even more aggressive campaign that could lead the Houthis to essentially lose control of large parts of the country’s north, U.S. officials said. But Mr. Trump has not yet authorized that strategy, wary of entangling the United States in a Middle East conflict he pledged to avoid during his campaign.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel has been pushing Mr. Trump to authorize a joint U.S.-Israel operation to destroy Iran’s nuclear weapons facilities, taking advantage of a moment when Iran’s air defenses are exposed, after a bombing campaign from Israel in October dismantled critical military infrastructure. Mr. Trump, reluctant to be drawn into a major war, has so far held off against pressure from both Israeli and U.S. hawks to seize the opening to strike Iran’s nuclear sites.

Since the Hamas-led assault on Israel in October 2023, Houthi rebels have attacked more than 100 merchant vessels and warships in the Red Sea with hundreds of missiles, drones and speedboats loaded with explosives, disrupting global trade through one of the world’s busiest shipping lanes.

Advertisement

The Houthis, who are backed by Iran and act as the de facto government in much of northern Yemen, largely discontinued their attacks when Israel and Hamas reached a cease-fire in Gaza in January. But Israel instituted a blockade on aid to Gaza this month, and the Houthis have said they will step up attacks in response.

The group’s assaults in recent weeks have angered Mr. Trump. They fired a surface-to-air missile at an Air Force F-16 flying over the Red Sea, missing the jet. A U.S. military MQ-9 Reaper drone disappeared over the Red Sea the same day Houthi militants claimed to have shot one down.

“To all Houthi terrorists, YOUR TIME IS UP, AND YOUR ATTACKS MUST STOP, STARTING TODAY.” Mr. Trump said in Truth Social message.

The initial airstrikes hit buildings in neighborhoods in and around Sana, Yemen’s capital, that were known Houthi leadership strongholds, residents said. According to the Houthi-run television news channel Al Masirah, the Yemeni health ministry said that nine people had been killed and nine others injured in airstrikes. The casualties could not be independently verified.

U.S. officials said the strikes on Saturday resulted from a series of high-level White House meetings this week between Mr. Trump and top national security aides, including Vice President JD Vance; Secretary of State Marco Rubio; Michael Waltz, the president’s national security adviser; Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth; and Gen. Michael E. Kurilla, the head of the military’s Central Command. Mr. Trump approved the plan on Friday.

Advertisement

The strikes were carried out by fighter jets from the aircraft carrier Harry S. Truman, now in the northern Red Sea, as well as by Air Force attack planes and armed drones launched from bases in the region, U.S. officials said.

During the Biden administration, the attacks on commercial shipping were met with several counterstrikes by U.S. and British military forces. Between last January and May, for instance, the two countries’ militaries conducted at least five major joint strikes against the Houthis in response to the attacks on shipping.

United States Central Command, which carried out the strikes on Saturday without any other nation’s assistance, has regularly announced military actions against the Houthis.

But the U.S.-led strikes have failed to deter them from attacking shipping lanes connecting to the Suez Canal that are critical for global trade. Hundreds of ships have been forced to take a lengthy detour around southern Africa, driving up costs. Despite the cease-fire in Gaza, some of the biggest container shipping lines show their vessels still going around the Cape of Good Hope and avoiding the Red Sea on their websites.

The Biden administration tried to chip away at the ability of the Houthis to menace merchant ships and military vessels without killing large numbers of Houthi fighters and commanders, which could unleash even more mayhem into a widening regional war that officials feared would drag in Iran.

Advertisement

Fears of that broader regional conflict have greatly subsided in the months since Israel decimated Hezbollah and Hamas, two main armed proxies for Iran in the region, and destroyed much of Iran’s air defenses with a series of punishing airstrikes last fall that left the country vulnerable to an even larger Israeli counterattack should it retaliate.

That has given Mr. Trump more leeway to undertake the large-scale bombing offensive against the Houthis and use it as a warning to Iranian leaders if they balked at talks centered on Tehran’s nuclear program.

But it is unclear how a renewed bombing campaign against the Houthis would succeed where previous American-led military efforts largely failed. Military officials said these strikes would hit a broader set of Houthi targets and would be carried out over weeks. Mr. Trump did not elaborate in his message on social media.

“Joe Biden’s response was pathetically weak, so the unrestrained Houthis just kept going,” Mr. Trump said, adding: “The Houthi attack on American vessels will not be tolerated. We will use overwhelming lethal force until we have achieved our objective.”

The Houthis, whose military capabilities were honed by more than eight years of fighting against a Saudi-led coalition, have greeted the prospect of war with the United States with open delight.

Advertisement

The Houthis, a tribal group, have taken over much of northern Yemen since they stormed the nation’s capital, Sana, in 2014, effectively winning a war against the Saudi-led coalition that spent years trying to rout them. They have built their ideology around opposition to Israel and the United States, and often draw parallels between the American-made bombs that were used to pummel Yemen and those sent to Israel and used in Gaza.

In late January, Mr. Trump issued an executive order to redesignate Yemen’s Houthi rebels as a “foreign terrorist organization,” calling the group a threat to regional security, the White House said. Critics argued the move will worsen an already dire humanitarian crisis in the country.

The order restored a designation given to the group, formally known as Ansar Allah, late in the first Trump administration. The Biden administration lifted the designation shortly after taking office, partly to facilitate peace talks in Yemen’s civil war.

Last year, however, the Biden team reversed course, labeling the Houthis a “specially designated global terrorist” organization — a less severe category — in response to attacks against U.S. warships in the Red Sea.

Officials in Washington and the Middle East were bracing on Saturday for a Houthi counterattack.

Advertisement

The Houthis’ spokesman, Mohammed Abdulsalam, said on social media on Jan. 22 that supporting the Palestinian cause would remain a top priority even after the cease-fire in Gaza. The Houthis have said they would stop targeting all ships “upon the full implementation of all phases” of the cease-fire agreement.

But at the same time, the Houthis warned that if the United States or Britain directly attacked Yemen, they would resume their assaults on vessels associated with those countries. Evidence recently examined by weapons researchers shows that the rebels may have acquired new advanced technology that makes their drones more difficult to detect and helps them fly even farther.

Peter Eavis contributed reporting from New York, and Saeed Al-Batati from Al Mukalla, Yemen.

News

A surprise resignation could open the door for an independent to win a Montana Senate seat

Published

on

A surprise resignation could open the door for an independent to win a Montana Senate seat

Seth Bodnar, the former president of the University of Montana, is now running for Senate as an independent

Kirk Siegler/NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Kirk Siegler/NPR

BUTTE, Mont. – It’s long been an adage in Montana politics that if you’re running for office, you’d better have a float in the Butte St. Paddy’s Day Parade, which draws thousands to the mining city’s historic uptown, soaking up the nostalgia – and the Guiness. 

Here, you’re just steps from the towering old mining headframes and the one mile long and half mile wide Berkeley Pit. Now shuttered, it was  once one of the world’s largest copper deposits. 

Larry Carden, in a Notre Dame sweatshirt, never misses the parade.

Advertisement

“You’ll see a lot more boos for the Republicans than you will the Democrats, I can guarantee you that,” he says. 

That’s a nod to Butte’s long history of Democratic politics and a strong labor movement going back to around 1900, when the “Copper King” mine owners ruled Montana business and media, and bribed their way into political office. Today, Carden, who’s retired, is worried that the mega rich are again influencing politics here, and how expensive life is in his home state.

“Between health care and gas and food, and you go to the store the other day, there’s rib steaks $19.99 a pound, you know,” Carden says.  

A political group marches in the St. Patrick's Day parade in Butte, Montana, March 17 2026

A political group marches in the St. Patrick’s Day parade in Butte, Montana, March 17 2026

Kirk Siegler/NPR


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Kirk Siegler/NPR

This year’s parade followed an unusually turbulent few days in Montana’s political scene – half of its congressional delegation abruptly retired. Despite the state’s recent tilt from purple to deep red, the races for their seats could be more in play now because of the way Senator Steve Daines and Congressman Ryan Zinke, both Republicans, gave up them up and chose their successors. In Daines’ case, he withdrew his candidacy just minutes before the filing deadline. 

Advertisement

Like a lot of people in Butte, Carden is a longtime Democrat. But he says he’s grown disillusioned with party politics.

“I would rather everything be independent where there is no party designation and then you have to pay more attention to who the person actually is,” Carden says.   

New Candidate opts to go independent

That’s exactly what Seth Bodnar, a former Green Beret running for U.S. Senate, is trying to capitalize on. He joined other candidates mixed in with Irish dancing troupes and fire department floats, as he walked the parade route along Park Street shaking the occasional hand and tossing candy. 

In an interview with NPR earlier in Missoula, Bodnar, who recently resigned his post as University of Montana president, pitched what he says would be his bi-partisan appeal.

“I’m an independent,” Bondar says. “When I raised my right hand at the age of 18 and I swore an oath to this Constitution when I joined the military, not to a political party.”.

Advertisement

Person over party used to be the playbook in Montana, which some call just one long Main Street. It’s how former Senator Jon Tester used to win despite being a Democrat as the state got redder.

The day after Bodnar formally announced he was gathering signatures to get on the ballot, his long shot bid got taken a lot more seriously. 

Sen. Steve Daines, who was elected to the Senate in 2014, sent shockwaves through the state’s political scene when he announced in a video posted to X that he’d decided not to seek reelection.  

Sen. Steve Daines, R-Mont., speaks at the Senate Finance Committee confirmation hearing for Scott Bessent, President-elect Donald Trump's choice to be Secretary of the Treasury, at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, Jan. 16, 2025.

Sen. Steve Daines, R-Mont., speaks at the Senate Finance Committee confirmation hearing for Scott Bessent, President-elect Donald Trump’s choice to be Secretary of the Treasury, at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, Jan. 16, 2025.

Ben Curtis/AP/AP


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Ben Curtis/AP/AP

“I’m also very thankful to have served alongside President Trump and my colleagues in the Senate,” Daines said in the video. “Together we built a conservative majority on the Supreme Court, we delivered the largest tax cut in U.S. history, we unleashed American energy dominance and secured our southern border.” 
 
Daines’ late hour withdrawal presumably clears the way for his chosen successor, Kurt Alme, the U.S. Attorney for Montana until he declared his candidacy for Daines’ seat. Daines later said withdrawing earlier could have enticed a prominent Democrat like Tester to enter the race. 

Advertisement

Independent Seth Bodnar says it reminds him of the Montana of old. 

“We have direct election of senators in the United States in part because of political corruption in this state 125 years ago, Copper Kings trying to buy U.S. Senate seats,” Bodnar says. “That didn’t work back then and it’s not going to work right now.”

But Democrats say Bodnar’s entry as an independent will just split the liberal vote. 

The GOP base is angry too

“Montanans are getting very indignant about what they see as out and out dishonesty,” says Roger Koopman, a former Republican legislator and Montana Public Service commissioner from Bozeman.  

Koopman says the party establishment’s backroom dealing is a gift to Democrats and especially Seth Bodnar, who he says is a liberal running as an independent.

Advertisement

“They’re going to say, ‘hey, I’m over these Republicans playing games with me, you can’t do that and expect me to vote for you, I’m not going to vote Democrat, but here’s this guy out here who says he’s independent, let me give him a try,’” Koopman says. 

Alme has been keeping a low profile. Political pundits say that might be by design. A campaign spokesperson sent NPR this statement: “Anyone could run for this seat. Kurt is running on his record as the Trump-endorsed candidate of common sense who knows how to be tough on violent crime, dismantle drug cartels, and deliver historic tax relief. Voters will decide, and Kurt is confident in his work serving Montana and helping President Trump put America First.”

At Montana State University, political science department chair Eric Austin says he expects party tensions will cool and Republicans will rally around their nominee by November. 

“I think in part that speaks to the changes in the electorate in the state,” Austin says. “As the state has become more red, people have more strongly affiliated themselves with the Republican Party and less as independents.” 

However, Austin says the midterms will be a referendum on President Trump and there’s growing economic anxiety in Montana. Farmers are getting hurt by Trump’s tariffs. His Iran War has sent fertilizer prices soaring, raised interest rates and the cost of gas. 

Advertisement

Back in Butte, at the St. Paddy’s Day parade, longtime Democratic activist Evan Barrett says there’s a resurgence in populist resentment in Montana. 

Longtime Montana Democratic party activist Evan Barrett at the St. Patrick's Day parade in Butte, Montana, March 17 2026

Longtime Montana Democratic party activist Evan Barrett at the St. Patrick’s Day parade in Butte, Montana, March 17 2026

Kirk Siegler/NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Kirk Siegler/NPR

“It’s almost like a repetition of the past,” says Barrett, a one time economic aide to former Governor Brian Schweitzer.  

Ducking into an old storefront to take a break from the spectacle of the parade, Barrett told NPR there’s a feeling in the electorate that a lot of outside money is coming into influence politics, but not staying in Montana and being invested into things like schools. 

“So this is a really wild and different year,” Barrett says. “Anybody that tells you they know what’s gonna happen, well, be a bit skeptical.” 

Advertisement

President Trump has endorsed last minute Senate candidate Kurt Alme but it’s not clear what kind of effect that might have on voters in November. 

Continue Reading

News

Video: Savannah Guthrie Says She Believes Her Mother Was Taken for Ransom

Published

on

Video: Savannah Guthrie Says She Believes Her Mother Was Taken for Ransom

new video loaded: Savannah Guthrie Says She Believes Her Mother Was Taken for Ransom

transcript

transcript

Savannah Guthrie Says She Believes Her Mother Was Taken for Ransom

Savannah Guthrie spoke on the “Today” show in her first interview since her mother, Nancy Guthrie, was abducted from her home near Tuscon, Ariz.

“The ransom note, notes for ransom requests came. Did you believe those to be real?” “The two notes that we received that we responded to — I tend to believe those are real.” “Really?” “We still don’t know. Honestly, we don’t know anything. We don’t know anything. So I don’t know that it’s because she’s my mom. But yeah, that’s probably — which is too much to bear to think that I brought this to her bedside, that it’s because of me. And I just say, I’m so sorry, Mommy. I’m so sorry. We need answers. We cannot be at peace without knowing. And someone can do the right thing. And it is never too late to do the right thing.”

Advertisement
Savannah Guthrie spoke on the “Today” show in her first interview since her mother, Nancy Guthrie, was abducted from her home near Tuscon, Ariz.

By Christina Kelso

March 26, 2026

Continue Reading

News

DHS shutdown live updates as Senate holds test vote on funding bill

Published

on

DHS shutdown live updates as Senate holds test vote on funding bill
 

Kim says GOP offer is “not where we want it to be”

Democratic Sen. Andy Kim of New Jersey said Democrats are continuing to evaluate the Republicans’ offer but said it does not go far enough.

“We’re talking through it right now but it’s not where we want it to be,” Kim said off the Senate floor. “We just continue to be stuck here.”

Kim said “we’re hunkered down” and “hopefully we can just continue to hash it out.” He did not give details about the latest offer, noting that conversations are “evolving in real time.”

Advertisement

“But for me, it’s not good enough for me,” he added. 

 

Advertisement

Senate now voting on advancing DHS funding

The Senate is taking a procedural vote on funding for DHS. The vote marks the seventh attempt to advance the measure, which needs 60 votes.

Asked whether the vote would be considered a response to the latest GOP offer, Thune said, “Hopefully there will be, yeah, there will be some finality in this real soon.”

“We’re going to know real soon,” he added. 

Advertisement
 

Photo ID amendment fails in party-line vote

The amendment that would have required voters to show photo identification to cast a ballot failed to advance. The vote was 53-47, falling short of the 60 votes needed to succeed.

The vote came during the second week of a marathon debate over a controversial elections bill known as the SAVE America Act, which would require proof of citizenship to register to vote and certain forms of photo ID to cast a ballot. The legislation does not have enough support to clear the 60-vote threshold in the upper chamber, but President Trump has dialed up the pressure on Senate Republicans to find a way to force it through. 

Read more here.

Advertisement

.

 

Advertisement

Britt says Republicans have had “very fruitful conversations” with Democrats

GOP Sen. Katie Britt of Alabama, who has been involved in talks to end the stalemate, told reporters that Republicans have had productive conversations with Democrats.

“We had very fruitful conversations last night with some of our Democrat colleagues and this morning. So, you know, I hope that we can find that pathway. I think that’s what’s best,” she said. “These missions don’t need to go unfunded, particularly at such a critical time in our nation’s history, and also the men and women that are working need to get paid.”

 
Advertisement

Senate begins vote on advancing amendment on photo ID for voting

The Senate has begun a vote on invoking cloture on an amendment that would require a photo ID to cast a ballot in federal elections. It needs 60 votes to succeed.

The vote on advancing DHS funding is expected next. 

Advertisement
 

King says Democrats are reviewing GOP offer

Sen. Angus King, an independent who caucuses with Democrats and has been involved in the talks over DHS funding, said Democrats are going over the latest Republican proposal.

“We’re reviewing that offer now,” King told reporters.

Advertisement
 

Thune: “Hopefully we can find a pathway to drive this to the finish”

Leaving the floor, Thune didn’t share details about the latest GOP offer, noting that the text is now in front of Democrats. But he stressed that “it’s important that we try and close this down and get it done today.”

“Let’s let the Dems react to what’s out there, and hopefully we can find a pathway to drive this to the finish,” Thune said.

Advertisement

He said the White House has been involved in “the back-and-forth that has occurred overnight and all morning.” He also suggested that the offer is close to what Republicans offered early this week, which Democrats rejected because it didn’t include reforms to ICE.

Asked about the possibility of delaying the Senate’s recess, Thune said If DHS funding isn’t resolved, “I suspect we’ll probably be around here.”

 
Advertisement

Thune says Republicans sent Democrats “last and final” offer

Entering the Senate chamber, Thune told reporters that Republicans have made a final offer to Democrats.

“The Dems are now in possession of what I think is our last and final,” Thune said. “So let’s hope this gets it done.”

Advertisement
 

Senate moves up votes to 1 p.m.

The votes that were originally scheduled for 1:30 p.m. — on the voter ID amendment and advancing DHS funding — will now take place at 1 p.m., according to Majority Whip John Barrasso’s office.

Advertisement
 

House to vote for third time on DHS funding

The House will vote this afternoon on legislation to fund DHS as movement on the issue remains stalled in the Senate. 

The lower chamber has twice passed legislation to fund the entire department through September, but it’s been effectively dead on arrival in the Senate as it’s been unable to overcome the 60-vote threshold to advance.

A vote is also planned on a resolution “expressing the support of the House” for the department. The resolution would do little beyond offer gratitude for DHS employees. 

Advertisement

Votes are expected to begin around 2 p.m. 

House Democrats, meanwhile, are trying to force a vote on legislation to fund all of DHS except ICE and CBP. But their discharge petition, introduced last week, is short of the 218 signatures needed to move forward. So far, 205 of 214 Democrats have backed it. It would also need the support of four Republicans. 

 
Advertisement

GOP senator says talks to end impasse have increased

Sen. John Hoeven, a North Dakota Republican involved in the DHS negotiations, told reporters at the Capitol that talks continue and have increased.

“We put options in front of the Democrats, and they just need to quit backing up on us and vote to get DHS funded and TSA agents paid,” Hoeven said.

He cited developments since the initial Democratic opposition to funding DHS, including the new leadership at the department and the deescalation in Minneapolis, along with some of the reforms within the initial DHS bill that remain on the table.

“I’m hoping that as we get to the end of this week — you know how it works around here with deadlines — that that’s going to get us to a point where we get it done,” he said. “But we’re still working.”

Advertisement

Hoeven said it’s a good thing that the Senate has begun voting, with a failed vote Wednesday on advancing the DHS bill and another vote set for later this afternoon. He said “I think that helps get some movement.”

“We’re just trying to find what it’s going to take to bring folks together and get it done,” Hoeven said. 

 
Advertisement

Thune: “We’re trying to narrow it in and home in on a deal”

Thune, appearing on Fox News on Thursday morning, accused Democrats of moving the goalposts and “talking in circles” on DHS funding. 

“Every single day they move the goalpost,” Thune said. “They said we don’t want to fund ICE. And now they’re saying we don’t want to fund ICE and we want reforms.”

The majority leader said “we’re trying to narrow it in and home in on a deal” that can be struck in the “very near future.” But he argued that for Democrats, it’s “all about politics.”

“I think they’re just playing politics with this, have been from the beginning,” Thune said. “They think it’s really good with their base.”

Advertisement

Thune said “this has got to stop,” adding that “I think they’re going to come to their senses — I hope they do.” 

Asked whether the Senate will go on its scheduled recess, Thune reiterated that “it’s very hard to take off if we don’t have DHS funded.”

“Obviously we’re looking at optionality in terms of what it would take if we have to be here,” Thune said. “But one way or the other, we have to get this done.”

Advertisement
 

Trump warns of “very drastic measures” without end to shutdown

At the beginning of a Cabinet meeting at the White House, President Trump blasted Democrats for the ongoing impasse, saying they are “really punishing the American people.”

“They need to end the shutdown immediately, or we’ll have to take some very drastic measures,” the president said, without elaborating. 

Advertisement
 

Senate to take up voter ID amendment, DHS funding beginning at 1:30 p.m.

The Senate is scheduled to convene at noon and will take two votes at 1:30 p.m, according to a notice from Majority Whip John Barrasso’s office.

The first vote will be on advancing an amendment to the SAVE America Act, which would require photo ID to cast a vote. The second vote will be on advancing the DHS funding measure. Additional votes are possible later in the day.

Advertisement
 

Sen. Ron Johnson renews call to end the filibuster

GOP Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin wrote an op-ed Thursday advocating for changing the Senate rules to end the 60-vote threshold required to advance most legislation in the chamber, a position he has been reiterating in recent days.

Advertisement

“I’m not sure how things could get much worse by ending the filibuster,” Johnson wrote in the Daily Wire. “The status quo certainly isn’t working. I think it’s obvious things must change — we need a paradigm shift.”

Johnson described dysfunction in the Senate, pointing particularly to the funding process and the five shutdowns that have occurred since he came to Congress in 2011. He compared the Senate to “plaque clogging an artery leading to a heart attack.” 

He acknowledged those in his party who wish to preserve the filibuster and argue that it fosters bipartisanship. But the Wisconsin Republican said that, if the filibuster ends, “we all might be surprised to find senators attempting to find common ground on more issues to help ensure bills pass with bipartisan support.”

Johnson opposed ending the filibuster until last fall’s 43-day shutdown, the longest in U.S. history. In 2022, Johnson said Democrats who wanted to abolish the practice were attempting a “naked power grab.”

Advertisement
 

Trump floats ending the filibuster to open DHS

President Trump floated ending the Senate’s 60-vote threshold to reopen DHS, asking, “When is ‘enough, enough’ for our Republican Senators.”

“There comes a time when you must do what should have been done a long time ago, and something which the Lunatic Democrats will do on day one, if they ever get the chance,” Mr. Trump said in a post on Truth Social. “TERMINATE THE FILIBUSTER, and get our airports, and everything else, moving again.”

Advertisement

The president urged the Senate to also add the SAVE America Act, an election bill he has repeatedly pushed Congress to pass. Earlier this week, he threw a wrench into DHS talks when he told Republicans not to make a deal with Democrats and to instead link the elections bill to DHS funding. 

Thune has repeatedly said there isn’t support for ending the filibuster within the GOP conference.

The president claimed in another post that Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer “will make a deal now because he thinks that if he doesn’t, Republicans will TERMINATE THE FILIBUSTER, something which they should do whether he makes a deal or not!!!”

Advertisement
 

Senate schedule up in the air as recess looms

The Senate is scheduled to be on recess for two weeks starting next week. But Thune has kept the door open to keeping the chamber in town if the impasse persists.

The majority leader told reporters as the Senate convened Wednesday that no decisions had been made yet on whether senators would stay in town if they’re unable to reach a deal. 

“I think it’s awfully hard not to have the government funded if we’re not here,” Thune said. 

Advertisement

Later Wednesday, Thune suggested that the deadline could put pressure on senators, who often leave town on Thursday nights, to reach a deal. 

“You know how it is around here. It’s not Thursday yet,” Thune said. “And sometimes you’ve got to let things run. We’ll see where the deal might land.”

 
Advertisement

Senate to vote again on advancing DHS funding

The Senate is set to vote Thursday afternoon on advancing a DHS funding measure. The motion fell short of the 60-vote threshold needed to succeed on Wednesday for the sixth time. 

It was the first time the chamber took the vote with the promise of the GOP offer, which would amend the measure funding all of DHS by stripping out the funds for ICE’s Enforcement and Removal Operations division. Just one Democrat, Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, voted in favor of moving forward. But Republicans are hoping to peel off more support on Thursday. 

Advertisement
 

Democrats pushing for reforms after GOP offers to forgo ICE deportation funding

Republicans quickly rejected Democrats’ counterproposal to fund the government and secure ICE reforms like boosting training standards and requiring immigration officers to wear identification on Wednesday. They criticized the offer as unserious, arguing that if Democrats refuse to fund ICE, they don’t have grounds to seek reforms to the agency. 

Democrats see things differently. 

Independent Sen. Angus King of Maine, who struck a deal with Republicans to end the last shutdown, outlined that ICE’s Homeland Security Investigations division and Customs and Border Protection would be funded under the GOP offer. He claimed that “right now, most of HSI is in ICE doing ERO work.”

Advertisement

“It’s an illusory solution, if they can man ICE with people from … CBP and HSI,” King said. “I don’t have any problem with HSI and CBP doing their jobs. But not if they’re doing ICE’s job.”

Despite the GOP pushback on Democrats’ effort to secure reforms, Thune suggested later in the day that there is some room for negotiation, saying if Democrats “get a more realistic set of proposals, or a more realistic offer on the table, then we’ll be back in business.”

The majority leader also didn’t rule out the possibility of a short-term measure to fund the government while conversations continue on a long-term solution.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending