Connect with us

News

Trump Blames L.A. Wildfires on Newsom Using Familiar Tactics

Published

on

Trump Blames L.A. Wildfires on Newsom Using Familiar Tactics

When enormous wildfires began to menace Los Angeles, the incoming president did not use his social media site to pledge support to emergency responders or offer words of compassion to a city where thousands of people have lost everything.

Instead, President-elect Donald Trump used his megaphone to tell the world who was at fault.

It wasn’t the Santa Ana winds, nor was it the rising temperatures that have dried out vegetation and made fires harder to extinguish.

The culprit, he wrote, was “Gavin Newscum.”

The Los Angeles fires have killed at least 11 people, reduced thousands of structures to ash and burned more than 36,000 acres, an area larger than the footprint of San Francisco. It’s the kind of devastation that, in a bygone era, might have prompted at least a temporary political cease-fire and pledges to work across the aisle to rebuild, even as the authorities face legitimate questions about their handling of the crisis.

Advertisement

Instead, with 10 days until Trump’s second inauguration, he offered a reminder of how he has long used disasters to damage political opponents like Gov. Gavin Newsom, Democrat of California — even when they’re still going on.

“What this feels like is, the man hasn’t changed an inch,” said Carmen Yulín Cruz, the former mayor of San Juan, Puerto Rico, whom Trump described as “nasty” when they tangled over the federal response to the devastation of Hurricane Maria on the island in 2017.

But it’s not just about hurting his political foes. Trump has always been a master of tapping into people’s angst and projecting it far and wide for his benefit — and there is a lot of angst in Los Angeles right now.

Residents in Los Angeles are angry that water systems never designed to fight so many threatening fires have run dry. They are mystified that Karen Bass, the Democratic mayor, wasn’t in the city when the blazes began. They are scared for their lives and fearful that the institutions they have come to rely on, like insurance, won’t make them whole on the other side of this.

This week, Trump has called for Newsom to resign, blamed other Democrats like President Biden and Mayor Bass and said incorrectly that the Federal Emergency Management Agency had no money to respond to the disaster because of the “Green New Scam.”

Advertisement

It’s a revival of a tendency he displayed during his first presidency, when he injected his personal politics into once-sacrosanct concepts like providing federal disaster aid to areas no matter whether they were blue or red. He told aides he wanted to stop money from reaching Puerto Rico after Maria, claiming that the island’s leadership was corrupt, and publicly insulted Cruz.

“At the beginning, I thought, ‘Why is he doing this?’” Cruz told me in an interview today. She suspected, she said, that it was because she was a Latina and a woman who had challenged his federal response to the disaster in her city. “It can be distracting, but it wasn’t distracting because I very clearly saw that it gave me an opportunity to talk about what was really going on in Puerto Rico.”

(He also struggled to manage the optics of his own response, like when he traveled to the island and hucked paper towels into the crowd.)

He also fought extensively with California. After the state’s devastating wildfire season of 2018, he tweeted that he had ordered FEMA to “send no more money” unless the state changed its approach to forest management. He has clashed on and off with Newsom over issues like water management and federal aid ever since.

In a text message last fall, Newsom told my colleagues that Trump often seemed to expect personal treatment before the state could receive aid, saying he was “publicly threatening, playing his politics — looking tough … forcing a call, a ‘transaction’ in his mind — reminding you in process who’s in control, why he matters.”

Advertisement

Beyond withholding aid, Trump has used disasters as political ammunition on the campaign trail. After a train derailed and spilled toxic chemicals in East Palestine, Ohio, in early 2023, he used the site as a backdrop to hammer the Biden administration, helping his presidential campaign pick up steam.

And last fall, when Hurricane Helene slammed into Georgia and North Carolina, he made a series of false claims about the federal disaster response as he sought to depict the Biden administration as hapless and even biased against Republicans who were in harm’s way.

Trump’s defenders say there is no reason he shouldn’t bring up politics in a moment irrevocably shaped by them.

“We will have a fire, and there will be winds to blow the fire, but what determines the flow of the fire and the infrastructure capability of the fire department to fight, it is on them,” said former Speaker Kevin McCarthy, a California Republican, referring to the Democratic leadership of the city and the state.

He added: “In a time of crisis, people look at their electeds for leadership. How do you think they’re doing? They’re blaming somebody else. They say you can’t ask these questions. They’re not in town — they can’t answer why something happened.”

Advertisement

James Gallagher, who serves as the Republican leader in the State Assembly and represents Paradise, a Northern California community that was devastated by the Camp Fire in 2018, said there was deep frustration that more hadn’t been done to reduce wildfire fuel in the state.

Climate change exacerbates conditions that can lead to wildfires, he said, but he blamed Democrats’ leadership for inadequate management of the dry brush that can fuel fires. (Trump has discussed this in the past, although his recent posts have focused more on his dispute with Newsom over water management, which California officials say would not have changed the circumstances around the fires.)

“The politics are wrapped up in some very substantive policy,” Gallagher said.

“We’ve been saying this for a long time — maybe we don’t have as big of a megaphone” as Trump, he added.

Advertisement

News

Video: Two National Guard Members Shot Near White House

Published

on

Video: Two National Guard Members Shot Near White House

new video loaded: Two National Guard Members Shot Near White House

transcript

transcript

Two National Guard Members Shot Near White House

Two members of the West Virginia National Guard were in critical condition after being shot near the White House on Wednesday. Officials said the gunman was in custody and appeared to have acted alone.

At approximately 2:15 this afternoon, members of the D.C. National Guard were on high-visibility patrols in the area of 17th and I Street Northwest when a suspect came around the corner, raised his arm with a firearm and discharged at the National Guard members. We must now re-examine every single alien who has entered our country from Afghanistan under Biden and we must take all necessary measures to ensure the removal of any alien from any country who does not belong here, or add benefit to our country. were able to. After some back and forth, able to subdue the individual and bring them into custody. Within moments, members of law enforcement in the area were also able to assist and bring that individual into custody. At this time, as. I’m live. Yes looks like two National Guard members have been shot with rapid fire. Guys, I need everybody to push back, please. Thank you. I need everybody to push back. Thank you. Shot the bus stop. Need everyone to step back, please. All right, folks, I need you to keep stepping back. Keep coming back this way, please Yeah there we go. There we go. O.K let’s. Let’s go. Come on. That’s bullshit. Look at it. Got it. I just want to have some fun. I’ve never. Done anything like this. So from what I heard, it sounded like an exchange of gun.

Advertisement
Two members of the West Virginia National Guard were in critical condition after being shot near the White House on Wednesday. Officials said the gunman was in custody and appeared to have acted alone.

By Chevaz Clarke and Jiawei Wang

November 26, 2025

Continue Reading

News

2 National Guard members wounded in ‘targeted’ attack in D.C., authorities say

Published

on

2 National Guard members wounded in ‘targeted’ attack in D.C., authorities say

Law enforcement agencies respond to a shooting near the White House on November 26, 2025 in Washington, D.C.

Tyrone Turner/WAMU


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Tyrone Turner/WAMU

Two West Virginia National Guard members were shot and injured near the White House in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday in what the city’s mayor described as a “targeted” attack. The shooter, who was also shot, is in custody, according to authorities.

Speaking at a press conference on Wednesday evening, Jeffrey Carroll, the executive assistant chief of the Washington Metropolitan Police Department, said the shooting occurred around 2:15 p.m.

Carroll said a gunman came around a corner and opened fire at the Guard members who were on patrol.

Advertisement

Two members of the West Virginia National Guard were shot near the White House on Wednesday, local authorities said. A suspect is being detained at a local hospital.

Tyrone Turner/WAMU


hide caption

toggle caption

Tyrone Turner/WAMU

Advertisement

Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser and Executive Assistant Chief of the Washington Metropolitan Police Department Jeffery Carroll stands near FBI Director Kash Patel as he speaks to the media following the shooting of two National Guard soldiers on November 26, 2025 in Washington, D.C.

Tyrone Turner/WAMU


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Tyrone Turner/WAMU

Nearby Guard members quickly intervened and subdued the shooter, he said. The two injured Guard members and the shooter were later transported to a hospital. Carroll said it was unclear who shot the gunman.

A motive had not yet been determined. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser said on X that the person responsible would “be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.”

Advertisement

Earlier on Wednesday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said he was aware that two Guard members were “critically wounded.”

He announced plans to send 500 more Guard troops to D.C. at the request of President Trump.

“This will only stiffen our resolve to ensure we make Washington, D.C. safe and beautiful,” he added.

Members of the U.S. Secret Service and other law enforcement officers stage at the Farragut West Metro station as they respond to a shooting on November 26, 2025 in Washington, D.C.

Tyrone Turner/WAMU


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Tyrone Turner/WAMU

A view of the scene after two members of the National Guard were shot and wounded near the White House on November 26, 2025. A suspect has been taken into custody.

Tyrone Turner/WAMU

Advertisement


hide caption

toggle caption

Tyrone Turner/WAMU

Advertisement

West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey had earlier said the Guard members were killed, but reversed himself less than half an hour later.

“We are now receiving conflicting reports about the condition of our two Guard members,” he wrote on X.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump said he was aware of the incident. The president was in Florida at the time of the shooting.

“The animal that shot the two National Guardsmen … is also severely wounded, but regardless, will pay a very steep price,” he added.

Attorney General Pam Bondi said on X that federal agents were on the scene of the shooting. FBI Director Kash Patel also said on X that the bureau “is engaged and assisting with the investigation.”

Advertisement

Over the past few months, more than 2,000 National Guard personnel have been sent to D.C. to assist with patrols and beautification efforts.

Law enforcement officers secure the scene after a shooting in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, Nov. 26, 2025.

Tyrone Turner/WAMU


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Tyrone Turner/WAMU

More than half of the Guard members were brought in from other states, including about 179 Guard members from West Virginia, according to the military’s Joint Task Force in D.C.

Trump began deploying troops to the nation’s capital in early August over concerns about the city’s crime rate. Last week, a federal judge ruled that the use of troops in D.C. was unlawful and ordered an end to the deployment. The judge’s preliminary injunction has not yet taken effect to give the Trump administration time to appeal.

This is a developing story and will be updated.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

National Parks to raise fees by $100 for international tourists to popular U.S. parks

Published

on

National Parks to raise fees by 0 for international tourists to popular U.S. parks

Tourists flock to Mather Point at Grand Canyon National Park, Oct. 1, 2025, in Grand Canyon, Ariz.

Ross D. Franklin/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Ross D. Franklin/AP

WASHINGTON — The National Park Service said Tuesday it is going to start charging the millions of international tourists who visit U.S. parks each year an extra $100 to enter some of the most popular sites, while leaving them out of fee-free days that will be reserved for American residents.

The announcement declaring “America-first entry fee policies” comes as national parks deal with the strain of a major staff reduction and severe budget cuts, along with recovering from damage during the recent government shutdown and significant lost revenue due to fees not being collected during that time.

The fee change will impact 11 national parks, including the Grand Canyon, Yellowstone and Yosemite, according to the U.S. Department of the Interior.

Advertisement

As part of the changes, which are set to take effect Jan. 1, foreign tourists will also see their annual parks pass price jump to $250, while U.S. residents will continue to be charged $80, according to the department’s statement.

Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said in a post on the social platform X that the changes make sure U.S. taxpayers who support the park service “continue to enjoy affordable access, while international visitors contribute their fair share to maintaining and improving our parks for future generations!”

A White House post on X laying out the increased fees ended with the phrase, “AMERICANS FIRST.”

The announcement follows a July executive order in which President Donald Trump directed the parks to increase entry fees for foreign tourists.

“There’s a lot to unpack in this announcement, including many questions on its implementation – all which NPCA will raise with the Department of Interior,” Kati Schmidt, a spokesperson for National Parks Conservation Association, said in an email.

Advertisement

The U.S. Travel Association estimated that in 2018, national parks and monuments saw more than 14 million international visitors. Yellowstone reported that in 2024, nearly 15% of its visitors were from outside the country, which was down from 30% in 2018.

The money made off the new fees will help support the national parks, including with upgrading facilities for visitors and maintenance, according to the statement.

The “resident-only patriotic fee-free days” next year include Veterans Day, which was one of the parks’ eight free days open to everyone in 2025. The Department of the Interior had announced those days by saying they wanted to ensure that “everyone, no matter their zip code, can access and enjoy the benefits of green spaces and our public lands.”

Continue Reading

Trending