Connect with us

News

The relentless rise of France’s far right

Published

on

The relentless rise of France’s far right

Sitting on the terrace of a café, Daniel, a 60-year-old retired building contractor, is reluctant to talk about how he will vote in upcoming high-stakes snap legislative elections in France. 

But the resident of Châteauroux, a small city in the centre of the country, has a lot of anger to vent against Emmanuel Macron. He believes the president is smug like the elites in Paris, has done little to curb rising crime and his move to increase the retirement age by two years is unfair.

The traditional left and rightwing parties that Daniel has voted for in the past have disappointed, so he is considering casting a first ballot for Marine Le Pen’s far-right Rassemblement National.

“I’m not saying I will definitely vote for the RN, but they have interesting things to say,” he says, such as the need to clamp down on immigration. He is not put off by the party’s historical roots in fascism, symbolised by its now 95-year-old founder, Jean-Marie Le Pen, who once likened the Nazi gas chambers to a “detail of history”.

“This is not Jean-Marie Le Pen’s party any more,” says Daniel, who asked not to use his surname, “and it’s dishonest to keep pretending it is.”

Advertisement

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Voters across France are grappling with a similar choice: are they ready to usher the nationalist, populist RN, once relegated to the fringes of politics, into the heart of government? 

The answer will come in just over three weeks at the end of a lightning campaign sparked by Macron’s shock call for early legislative elections after being trounced by the RN in European elections on June 9. 

The outcome of the snap poll on June 30 and the second round on July 7 will depend largely on whether voters see the RN of today — the one that Marine Le Pen has spent more than a decade crafting into a smoother, more professional force — as up to the task.

Voting patterns in the Berry region of central France where Daniel lives show how the RN is making inroads in new areas and voter segments. It is conquering a swath of France that academics have called “the diagonal of emptiness” for its depopulation, paucity of high-speed train links and weak economy.  

Advertisement

About 250 kilometres south of Paris, Berry is made up of the Indre and Cher departments, and is home to France’s wheat-growing heartland, small villages and the cities of Châteauroux and Bourges. Support for the RN increased by double digits in European elections this month versus five years ago.

Rassemblement National’s Marine Le Pen and Jordan Bardella
Rassemblement National’s Le Pen and Bardella at a campaign event this month. The social media savvy Bardella has helped to boost the party’s appeal © Stephane De Sakutin/AFP/Getty Images

Polling from Elabe shows the RN on track for another big win with 31 per cent of voting intentions in the new legislative elections, ahead of a new leftwing coalition with 28 per cent, and far ahead of Macron’s centrist alliance with 18 per cent. 

Crucially, a unity pact struck by four leftwing parties on Thursday means Macron’s party is at risk of being squeezed out of many run-offs, leaving two-way contests between the left and the far right.

The polls suggest Le Pen’s party could gain enough seats to make a claim to the prime minister’s office — and could even win an outright majority. That would force Macron into an uncomfortable power-sharing government with the RN’s charismatic 28-year-old party chief, Jordan Bardella, as prime minister. 

An RN win would be a seismic moment in France’s modern history: the far right has never been in power save for in the Vichy era after the country was partly occupied by Germany in 1940. Given Le Pen’s Euroscepticism and desire to take power back from Brussels, there could be significant repercussions for France’s relationship with the EU and its closest partner, Germany. 

Securing the premiership would give Le Pen’s party a chance to enact its programme of curbs on immigration, tax cuts that would aggravate an already large deficit left by Macron, and radical ideas to exempt France from EU single market rules. 

Advertisement
Jean-Marie and Marine Le Pen
Jean-Marie and Marine Le Pen. The founder of what is now RN was expelled by the party as part of his daughter’s drive to detoxify its brand and make it an electoral force © Bernard Patrick/ABACA via Reuters

Pascal Perrineau, an academic and author who has studied the French far right for decades, says he can no longer rule out the idea that voters are willing to see the RN leading the government.

“Only a few years ago, I would have said their victory was highly unlikely,” he says. “Now I see it is possible and even probable.”


Macron’s bet is that the country will blink and that Le Pen will fall short of an outright majority. This week he reached for well-honed arguments he has successfully used to beat Le Pen and her party over the years — that the far right is too incompetent to govern, it would tank the economy, divide society with racism and antisemitism, and threaten the rule of law. 

“I hear the anger — message received,” he said alluding to frustration-fuelled protest votes for the RN. But “what would happen to your pensions? They would no longer be able to pay them. What would happen to your mortgages?

“If the RN came to power, what would happen to our values or our fellow citizens of diverse origins? . . . These are the questions [before you] today.”

Le Pen dismisses Macron’s arguments as scaremongering. With Bardella at her side, she insists they are ready to govern. 

Advertisement
CFDT unionists on a march in Nice last year as part of a protest against the reforms to France’s pension system that were driven through by Macron’s government
CFDT unionists on a march in Nice last year as part of a protest against the reforms to France’s pension system, which were driven through by Macron’s government © Hache Valery/AFP/Getty Images

The social media savvy Bardella has been key to expanding the RN’s appeal among those historically wary of the party — retirees, white-collar workers and women — all of whom voted for the party in the European election at higher levels than before.

“People here support RN and they love Bardella, they think he’s going to give them the moon and a cheque each,” says a restaurant owner in Châteauroux, who declined to be named. 

The Le Pen-Bardella duo mock Macron’s criticism of their economic policies by pointing out his government has caused deficits to balloon. On the hot-button issues of the RN’s previous cosiness with Russia and its antisemitic past, Le Pen has sought to defuse them by quickly declaring her support for Ukraine in 2022 and supporting France’s Jewish community after the Hamas attack in Israel on October 7. 

Kévin Pfeffer, an MP from Moselle in eastern France and RN party treasurer, says victory is within reach and an outright majority “attainable”, making Le Pen a frontrunner for the 2027 presidential election.

“Marine Le Pen’s mission has been to take each critique made against the RN and dismantle them methodically one by one,” he says. “The French are ready. They are sending us a signal that they want to try us out.” 


In the Berry region as elsewhere, RN voting results have been helped by Le Pen’s long effort to “detoxify” the movement her father founded in 1972 under the name the Front National, which included figures who supported the Nazi collaborationist Vichy government during second world war.

Advertisement

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

When she took over in 2011, she expelled the party’s more radical elements, including her father, and rebranded it as the Rassemblement National. While keeping its core DNA of protecting French identity, Le Pen focused on cost of living issues and the plight of low-income workers. 

The RN vote in Indre leapt to 40 per cent in the European election, up 26 percentage points from the last vote in 2019, while Macron’s support increased by 4 percentage points. 

In historically left-leaning Saint-Benoît-du-Sault, Le Pen’s scores have also steadily risen in the past decade. This year the picturesque medieval village filled with flower boxes — population 550 — saw its last boulangerie and a butcher’s shop close. The shuttering of a local cookware factory in 2019 was another blow. 

Le Pen has cast herself as the champion of such places — what she calls the “forgotten France” — far from the wealth, power and cultural cache of Paris and its population of well-off Macron voters. 

Damien Barré, Saint-Benoît-du-Sault’s left-leaning young mayor, is determined to combat people’s sense of decline by fighting to retain businesses and services. His projects include landscaping, building restoration and cultural programming. He even went on a quest last year to find a male goat to mate with the village’s ageing herd. 

Advertisement

Although the sense of being left behind is a powerful motor of the RN vote, he says, its appeal is now wider than that. 

Damien Barré
Damien Barré, the left-leaning mayor of Saint-Benoît-du-Sault, where RN’s support has steadily risen in the past decade. He says he is fighting to stem people’s sense of decline © Adrienne Klasa/FT

“We have been told for a decade that voting for the RN is a protest vote, it’s a fed-up vote, but actually since Marine Le Pen took over the party it is a vote of support. People will tell you, ‘I support their programme, that is why I am voting for them’,” Barré says.

Although mostly rural, voters in Indre and Cher are also worried about crime and immigration — core drivers of the RN vote. A government plan to build a facility to house asylum seekers in a village near Saint-Benoît-du-Sault split opinion and sparked protests.

In Châteauroux, residents are haunted by the stabbing of 15-year-old Matisse Marchais in April. When two people of Afghan descent were indicted for the crime, RN party chief Bardella declared that Matisse was a “victim of out of control immigration that brings predators to our door”.

On a national level, the sociology of the RN vote is also changing.

In the European election, 34 per cent of 60-somethings voted RN, according to an Ipsos analysis, up from 23 per cent in 2019. They even outperformed Macron’s alliance among pensioners, a cohort that has long been loyal to the president and which accounts for a third of the electorate.

Advertisement

“There is no longer a segment of the population or a corner of the country that is off limits for the RN,” says Brice Teinturier, a pollster from Ipsos. “They have become a catch-all party.”

The RN’s new strength with white-collar workers can be seen in Bourges, a city of 66,000 in the Cher department.

Saint-Benoit-du-Sault
Le Pen has cast herself as a champion of places like Saint-Benoit-du-Sault, a picturesque village that in recent years has faced population decline and business closures © Ed Buziak/Alamy

After a period of industrial decline, Bourges has enjoyed an economic boost in recent years as a hub for defence companies benefiting from the war in Ukraine. The biggest private employer, missile group MBDA, is hiring staff to build a second factory, and munitions maker Nexter is also expanding.

Yann Galut, the leftist mayor, says he was “shocked” by the 8 percentage point jump in RN support, which was not as big as in nearby rural areas, but significant in a historically moderate city. 

He fears the far right could soon capture all three of Cher’s seats in the legislature for the first time. Using a French term for voters’ desire to throw the political class out of office, he says there is “an explosive cocktail of dégagisme and a deep hatred of Emmanuel Macron.”

He adds: “I don’t believe the RN has the capacity to run the country and I abhor their politics that play on fears. Yet they are on the verge of power.” 

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

NFL hit with $4.7bn antitrust verdict over ‘Sunday Ticket’ game package

Published

on

NFL hit with $4.7bn antitrust verdict over ‘Sunday Ticket’ game package

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

A California jury has found the US National Football League violated antitrust laws and ordered it to pay $4.7bn in damages to customers who bought a package of its live games over satellite television, in a landmark case that could reshape the market for sports rights distribution.

The verdict comes in a federal class-action lawsuit brought by subscribers to the NFL’s Sunday Ticket package, who alleged the league’s out-of-market games violated antitrust rules by restricting competition for certain Sunday afternoon fixtures to pay-TV.

The case, which was tried in a federal court in Los Angeles, may have wide-reaching consequences for how live sports rights are bundled. It also delivers a significant blow to the world’s richest sports league, as the fines could be tripled under US federal antitrust law.

Advertisement

The NFL said it was “disappointed” with the verdict. “We continue to believe that our media distribution strategy . . . is by far the most fan friendly distribution model in all of sports and entertainment.” It said it would “contest” the verdict and maintained the claims were “baseless and without merit”.

In 1961, US Congress passed the Sports Broadcasting Act, which gives professional sports leagues such as the NFL an exemption from antitrust laws in order to pool sales of its media broadcast rights. Underpinning the act is the idea that professional teams including the Dallas Cowboys and the New York Giants operate as franchises of one business unit — the league — and as such media distribution of their fixtures is not in competition with one another.

Still, there are four time zones across the continental US, and the majority of NFL fixtures take place simultaneously on Sunday afternoons. That has created demand for so-called out-of-network games, which the league sells as its Sunday Ticket package. Viewers can watch fixtures of local teams on their regional Fox or CBS free-to-air network, but must purchase Sunday Ticket to watch games outside their home markets.

Underscoring the seriousness of the case and its implication for the future of live sports rights, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell and Cowboys owner Jerry Jones were among the witnesses testifying for the league during the trial. Goodell told the jury it was the first time he has presented under oath in a federal courtroom since he began his term in 2006, according to a report from the Associated Press.

The league maintained Sunday Ticket is a premium product with premium pricing, and as such would not undercut viewership for free-to-air local games. The package costs between $349 and $449 per year, depending on whether consumers have a subscription with distributor YouTube TV. Sunday Ticket was distributed by satellite provider DirecTV from 1994 until 2023, when the league awarded the rights to Google’s YouTube TV in a record $14bn contract.

Advertisement

The lawsuit was brought by a San Francisco sports bar called the Mucky Duck in 2015 and has since been expanded to a class-action representing millions of subscribers and tens of thousands of similar establishments. The plaintiffs have highlighted, among other evidence, a 2017 internal NFL memo titled “New Frontier”, which suggested the league could divvy up Sunday fixtures across cable channels rather than pool them to satellite TV.

Unlike other US professional leagues, including Major League Baseball and the National Basketball Association, NFL teams do not offer individual TV packages. In his trial testimony, Cowboys owner Jones said he was “completely against each team doing TV deals”, according to the AP, despite the fact that a theoretical direct-to-consumer offering for his team — estimated to be worth $9bn by Forbes, the most valuable professional club in global sport — would likely rake in subscriptions.

Continue Reading

News

At the border, migrants ‘wait and see’ as encounters with Border Patrol dip 40%

Published

on

At the border, migrants ‘wait and see’ as encounters with Border Patrol dip 40%

Border patrol agents pick up migrants waiting to be processed in Dulzara, California on June 25, 2024.

Zaydee Sanchez for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Zaydee Sanchez for NPR

Jacumba Valley, Calif. — Encounters between U.S. Customs and Border Patrol and migrants crossing the southern border without authorization decreased by 40% in the three weeks since new asylum restrictions took effect.

In announcing the executive actions on June 4, President Biden said these measures were needed to bring “order to the border.”

His administration points to the latest statistics as proof that the new policies are succeeding.

Advertisement

“The president’s actions are working because of their tough response to illegal crossings,” Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas said at a press conference in Tucson, Arizona on Wednesday.

“We are removing more noncitizens without a legal basis to stay here.”

But the number of people arrested while attempting to cross the border declined over the past five months, and not all of that is attributable to U.S. policy. Mexico also scaled up its enforcement and has been stopping migrants from trekking north toward the U.S.

Mayorkas says the administration has doubled the number of expedited removals in the last three weeks, with more than 100 international repatriation flights to 20 countries. 

According to the DHS, arrests haven’t been this low since January 2021.

Advertisement

Crossings are fewer but still hazardous for those who make the journey

So far on the California border, there’s been a noticeable shift: up until last month, the San Diego sector had been the place with most undocumented migrant crossings.

A migrant woman and her nine-year-old hold each other as they wait for border patrol agents in Dulzara, California. The family of three migrated from Ecuador and is hoping to seek asylum in the U.S. June 25, 2024.

A migrant woman and her nine-year-old hold each other as they wait for border patrol agents in Dulzara, California. The family of three migrated from Ecuador and is hoping to seek asylum in the U.S. June 25, 2024.

Zaydee Sanchez for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Zaydee Sanchez for NPR

A sandal can be seen through the busses of the desert in Dulzura, California, on June 24, 2024.

A sandal can be seen through the busses of the desert in Dulzura, California, on June 24, 2024.

Zaydee Sanchez for NPR


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Zaydee Sanchez for NPR

A couple of migrants wait to be processed by border patrol agents in Dulzara, California on June 25, 2024.

A couple of migrants wait to be processed by border patrol agents in Dulzara, California on June 25, 2024.

Zaydee Sanchez for NPR


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Zaydee Sanchez for NPR

Just weeks ago, hundreds of migrants still waited in campsites scattered throughout California’s Jacumba Valley, a remote area 80 miles east of San Diego. There, they could wait to be picked up by Border Patrol and petition for asylum.

Advertisement

Lately, these locations look mostly empty, and makeshift tents flap in the wind. But some people still cross the border and end up here — including a family with three small children NPR encountered at one of the sweltering desert camps.

One of the children, a 7-year-old, was seriously dehydrated and seemed about to pass out. As humanitarian volunteers gave him first aid, the child’s parents explained that the family had walked for eight hours through the desert.

The journey was challenging– they evaded snakes and mountain lions– but staying in their native Mexico was not an option.

The family owns an auto repair shop in the southern state of Michoacán, where they were extorted and feared for their lives.

The mother, Jazmin Mora, says the family first fled to Tijuana, hoping to make it to the United States where they have family. But after just one month in the Mexican border city, they encountered violence there too, so they decided to try to cross.

Advertisement
A mattress at the southern border in Jacumba Hot Springs, California, on June 24, 2024.

A mattress at the southern border in Jacumba Hot Springs, California, on June 24, 2024.

Zaydee Sanchez for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Zaydee Sanchez for NPR

Advertisement

Jazmin Mora puts a cold patch on her forehead to cool down as she and her family wait for border patrol agents in Jacumba Hot Springs, California on June 24, 2024.

Jazmin Mora puts a cold patch on her forehead to cool down as she and her family wait for border patrol agents in Jacumba Hot Springs, California on June 24, 2024.

Zaydee Sanchez for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Zaydee Sanchez for NPR

A border patrol agent approaches the informal migrant camp in Jacumba Hot Springs, California, as a child washes her hands on June 24, 2024.

A border patrol agent approaches the informal migrant camp in Jacumba Hot Springs, California, as a child washes her hands on June 24, 2024.

Zaydee Sanchez for NPR


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Zaydee Sanchez for NPR

“We moved around to several other places, but the reality is all Mexico is unsafe for everybody,” said Mora.

Her family’s story embodies what immigration analysts have told NPR about the newer border measures: deterrence policies alone do not work to curtail undocumented immigration in the long run.

Advertisement

Implications for the U.S. presidential election

Although the Biden administration touts these policies as a success, migrants continue to arrive at the border, although they stay on the Mexican side to ‘wait and see’ when to cross.

The announcement of lower numbers of border encounters and higher numbers of removals comes just before the first presidential debate on Thursday, in which immigration is expected to be front and center.

Far away from the politics of Washington D.C., neither migrants nor the locals had much to say about the border policies. They told NPR they see it as politics as usual –no real, lasting solutions.

Continue Reading

News

US Supreme Court rejects Sackler liability releases in Purdue bankruptcy

Published

on

US Supreme Court rejects Sackler liability releases in Purdue bankruptcy

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

The US Supreme Court has invalidated a measure in Purdue Pharma’s bankruptcy that would shield members of the company’s founding Sackler family from future civil liability in exchange for a $6bn contribution, in a closely watched case involving the maker of the opioid OxyContin.

The Department of Justice had sought to invalidate the comprehensive liability releases granted to the Sacklers, saying they could not be justified under existing US law. The Supreme Court on Thursday agreed in a 5-4 ruling.

But the high court’s majority stressed that its decision was a “narrow one” that did not “call into question consensual third-party releases offered in connection with a bankruptcy reorganisation plan”.

Advertisement

This is a developing story

Continue Reading

Trending