Connect with us

News

The 22 wildest lines from Donald Trump’s 12(!)-page statement on the January 6 committee | CNN Politics

Published

on

The 22 wildest lines from Donald Trump’s 12(!)-page statement on the January 6 committee | CNN Politics



CNN
 — 

In response to the second public listening to of the January 6 committee, former President Donald Trump launched a 12-page assertion – sure, 12 full pages! – looking for to rebut the costs leveled in opposition to him.

It’s full of the standard name-calling, exaggerations and conspiracy theories which have dominated Trump’s post-2020 election life. However it’s additionally a window into the previous President’s psyche because the January 6 committee weighs whether or not to advocate a prison indictment of Trump to the Division of Justice.

I went by way of Trump’s, um, assertion. The strains from it it’s essential to see are beneath.

Advertisement

1. “If they’d any actual proof, they’d maintain actual hearings with equal illustration.”

Do not forget that the explanation there isn’t an impartial fee – just like the one which investigated the 9/11 terrorist assaults – is as a result of Senate Republican Chief Mitch McConnell killed it after it had handed the Home with 35 GOP votes. And away we go!

2. “They use the illegally-constituted committee to placed on a smoke and mirrors present for the American folks, in a pitiful last-ditch effort to deceive the American public … once more.”

It’s in no way clear to me what Trump thinks is illegitimate concerning the January 6 committee. It’s a choose committee established by Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Not in contrast to the Benghazi choose committee established by then-Home Speaker John Boehner.

3. “They’ve refused to permit their political opponents to take part on this course of, and have excluded all exculpatory witnesses, and anybody who so simply factors out the failings of their story.”

Advertisement

Once more, this isn’t fairly correct. First off, the explanation the committee has two Republicans and 9 Democrats is as a result of a) McConnell nixed the thought of an impartial fee and b) Home Minority Chief Kevin McCarthy pulled all 5 of his picks for the committee when Pelosi rejected the appointments of Indiana Rep. Jim Banks and Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan. Second, loads of strongly pro-Trump witnesses have been subpoenaed by the committee. Actually, Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro, two shut Trump confidants, have refused to adjust to subpoenas to testify earlier than the committee.

4. “The Unselect Pseudo-Committee has coordinated with their media puppets to broadcast their witnesses on nationwide tv with none opposition, cross-examination, or rebuttal proof.”

I hate to sound like a damaged document right here, however the committee took greater than 1,000 depositions from all types of witnesses – together with Invoice Stepien, who managed Trump’s 2020 marketing campaign, and Invoice Barr, who served as Trump’s legal professional normal. These aren’t precisely portraits of Trump haters. Plus, the committee tried to speak to folks like Bannon and Navarro.

5. “What are the members of this treasonous ‘Committee’ afraid of?”

That is coming from somebody who refused to simply accept the outcomes of a free and truthful election and incited folks to protest the outcomes due to a sequence of simply debunked conspiracy theories.

Advertisement

6. “Democrats created the narrative of January sixth to detract from the a lot bigger and extra necessary fact that the 2020 Election was Rigged and Stolen.”

Uh, what. So, a number of folks died on account of the riots on January 6. Greater than 100 law enforcement officials had been injured. Over 800 folks have been criminally charged for his or her roles within the rebellion that day. That’s much less necessary {that a} set of lies about supposed election fraud?

7. “They illegally inflated voter rolls, illegally allowed harvested and stuffed ballots, abused the usage of mail-in ballots, bodily eliminated Republicans from counting amenities, abused the aged in nursing houses, bribed election officers with donations, stopped relying on Election Evening, gave Democrats three additional days to reap ballots, and demanded that the American folks imagine it was official.”

Wow. That’s, um rather a lot. There was completely no proof that there was widespread voter fraud within the 2020 election.

8. “The reality is that People confirmed up in Washington, D.C. in large numbers (however seldom revealed by the press), on January sixth, 2021, to carry their elected officers accountable for the apparent indicators of prison exercise all through the Election.”

Advertisement

Crowd dimension has lengthy been a Trump hobbyhorse. However there’s simply no proof that the press purposely low-balled the group on January 6. Additionally, that’s completely irrelevant. Which is that this: A mob of rioters stormed the US Capitol fueled by an election lie pushed by Trump that he had one way or the other been cheated out of victory.

9. “That is all a ridiculous and treasonous try and cowl up the truth that Democrats rigged the Election and are siphoning People’ freedoms and energy for their very own profit.”

What, precisely, is treasonous concerning the January 6 committee? Trump – shock, shock – doesn’t clarify.

10. “On Election Evening, America watched as my lead grew and grew over Joe Biden, as I used to be set to assert one other victory.”

Merely not true. We knew nicely upfront of Election Day that, largely due to new guidelines in place to take care of the Covid-19 pandemic, the variety of mail-in ballots can be far greater than in previous elections. And we knew that it could take a while to correctly course of all of them. Right here’s what Stepien, Trump’s marketing campaign supervisor, prompt he say on election evening: “My advice was to say that ‘votes had been nonetheless being counted, it’s too early to inform, too early to name the race however we’re happy with the race we ran and we predict we’re in good place.’” Trump didn’t take that recommendation.

Advertisement

11. “The Swamp was so decided to maintain their stranglehold on energy that they delayed the outcomes of the Election in order that they might discover, manufacture, or produce extra ballots, after they knew what number of they wanted to beat me.”

“Thus far, we’ve not seen fraud on a scale that would have effected a distinct consequence within the election,” Barr stated on December 1, 2020.

12. “There’s no affordable clarification for why it took a lot longer to depend the few remaining ballots versus the thousands and thousands on Election Day – aside from they wanted to visitors extra ballots, and it took 4 days to supply the ballots and do it.”

Other than merely claiming it to be so, Trump gives no proof for his declare that there have been “few remaining ballots” left to be counted after Election Day. The rationale he doesn’t provide any proof for this declare is that none exists.

13. “Like drug mules, on this context, mules are these paid to illegally visitors ballots from nonprofits organizations and drop them into the poll drop packing containers.”

Advertisement

It’s nicely value watching – or studying – Barr’s full takedown from Monday’s listening to of the movie “2,000 Mules” which is the place Trump will get this bogus info. Right here’s the gist of it in a single Barr quote: “For those who take 2 million cell telephones and determine the place they’re bodily in a giant metropolis like Atlanta or wherever, simply by definition, one can find many lots of of them have handed by and hung out within the neighborhood of those packing containers.”

14. “The reality is, in response to Joe Biden, that the Swamp has created the ‘most in depth and inclusive voter fraud group within the historical past of American politics – and it facilities round poll trafficking.’”

As Reuters famous of the Biden quote cited by Trump right here: “It was a slip of the tongue – Biden was describing the voter safety program his marketing campaign has launched in anticipation of potential authorized fights over the result of the Nov. 3 election in opposition to President Donald Trump.”

15. “It’s additionally extremely doubtless that True the Vote didn’t uncover 100% of the mules, making the numbers a lot bigger than a landslide in scope, and that there have been many extra mules on the market affecting extra of the Election than we notice. This was not an in depth Election.”

Joe Biden received greater than 81 million votes to Trump’s 74 million. So no, by latest measures it wasn’t a very shut election. However I don’t suppose that’s what Trump means.

Advertisement

16. “Joe Biden, a candidate who by no means left his basement and might’t communicate with out a teleprompter, outperformed Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton of their two high-charged elections.”

By way of uncooked vote totals, that’s true. Biden’s 81 million votes is greater than both Clinton or Obama obtained. However, in each 2008 (365) and 2012 (332), Obama obtained extra electoral votes than Biden.

17. “Both there’s plenty of black voters in America who establish extra with Joe Biden than Barack Obama, or Democrats are stealing black votes – and everyone knows the reply to that.”

Earlier than this line, Trump cites a handful of majority-Black counties and areas the place Biden did higher in 2020 than Obama did in 2008 or 2012. That truth is proof optimistic of fraud, in response to Trump. In fact, it’s not. Initially, the inhabitants, within the Black group and elsewhere, grew between 2008 and 2020, which means that there have been simply extra voters available for Biden than for Obama. Additionally, and I’m simply spitballing right here, isn’t it attainable that the need to vote Trump out of workplace was a strong motivator for heaps and many Black voters?

18. “Mark Zuckerberg contributed $419 million {dollars} to election initiatives across the nation.”

Advertisement

Trump is suggesting right here that Zuckerberg, the founding father of Fb, spent lots of of thousands and thousands of {dollars} to make sure that Democrats received the 2020 election. The one factor he will get proper although is the sum of money Zuckerberg spent. Trump would do nicely to learn this Protocol piece headlined “How ‘Zuck Bucks’ saved the 2020 election — and fueled the Huge Lie.”

19. “Zuckerberg must be criminally prosecuted. Election legal guidelines forestall people from donating greater than $5,000 per yr, but Zuckerberg gave $419 million.”

Once more, Trump is just flawed about what Zuckerberg did within the 2020 election. As Protocol notes: “He provided grants to any election official who needed one, as long as they spent it on what lots of people would think about mundane necessities that make it simpler and safer for everybody to vote: poll sorters, drop packing containers, ballot employees and — as a result of it was 2020 — hand sanitizer.”

18. “Rumors circulated that the Justices devolved to shouting and argued intensely over the best way to deal with the Texas v. Pennsylvania case. In the end, the Justices yielded to the identical worry mongering ways Democrats had deployed for years. They punted and threw the case out on standing.”

As CNN reported of the election fraud case introduced by Texas Lawyer Normal Ken Paxton: “The court docket’s order, issued with no public dissents, to dismiss the problem is the strongest indication but that Trump has no likelihood of overturning election ends in court docket, and that even the justices whom he positioned there have no real interest in permitting his determined authorized bids to proceed.” No public dissents. So, yeah.

Advertisement

19. “However, the Swamp runs deep. I assume that turning round an election was a step too far.”

Sure, I’d say overturning an election was a “step too far.”

20. “People are struggling to fill their fuel tanks, feed their infants, educate their kids, rent staff, order provides, defend our border from invasion, and a number of different tragedies which might be 100% brought on by Democrats who obtained energy by way of a rigged election, and the folks of our nation are each indignant and unhappy.”

This sentence is 53 phrases lengthy. Yup.

21. “No person brings this up, however as President, I suffered years of vicious lies, scandals, and innuendo regarding a faux and contrived narrative of Russia, Russia, Russia.”

Advertisement

Enable me to cite from the Mueller Report: “(I)f we had confidence after a radical investigation of the info that the President clearly didn’t commit obstruction of justice, we might so state,” reads the Mueller report. “Based mostly on the info and the relevant authorized requirements, we’re unable to achieve that judgment. … Accordingly, whereas this report doesn’t conclude that the president dedicated a criminal offense, it additionally doesn’t exonerate him.”

22. “That is merely an try and cease a person that’s main in each ballot, in opposition to each Republicans and Democrats by broad margins, from working once more for the Presidency.”

So, is Trump saying he’s working for president once more in 2024? Huge information! Yeah, this seems like a very good place to finish.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Silicon Valley aghast at the Musk-Trump divorce

Published

on

Silicon Valley aghast at the Musk-Trump divorce

As Donald Trump and Elon Musk’s “bromance” broke apart on Thursday, tech industry figures who had backed both men raced to contain the fallout.

“Elon isn’t taking calls from anyone,” complained one Silicon Valley financier and major donor to Republican candidates. “Not from people who have billions invested in his companies . . . The Valley is losing their shit.”

At stake was an alliance between the tech world and the populist right that not only helped return Trump to office but also one that founders and investors had hoped would herald an era of tax cuts and deregulation, as well as an open door to crypto and artificial intelligence.

Musk’s role in the Trump administration had also paved the way for several Silicon Valley figures to take prominent positions in government — roles that could now be in peril. 

The sudden deselection of Jared Isaacman, a Musk ally and tech founder who had been nominated to lead Nasa, was just the start of an expected “purge”, one person close to the administration said, threatening tech’s hard-won influence in Washington.

Advertisement
Jared Isaacman alongside the recovered first stage of a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket © Patrick T. Fallon/AFP/Getty Images

Some of those considered to be at risk were crypto and AI tsar David Sacks, policy adviser Sriram Krishnan, and Michael Grimes, Musk’s former banker at Morgan Stanley, now an official at the Department of Commerce.

As Musk’s relationship with the White House worsened, key figures on the tech right tried to play down the permanence of the rift. 

“USA is VERY lucky to have both E and Pres Trump,” Joe Lonsdale, a co-founder of Palantir and investor in Musk’s companies wrote on X. 

Hedge fund manager Bill Ackman urged the duo to “make peace for the benefit of our great country”, pleading: “We are much stronger together than apart.”

David Friedberg, a co-host of the All-In podcast that often features Musk and that has become a sounding board for the Trump-aligned tech world, suggested there was a broader cost to America from the spat between the US president and the Tesla boss. “China just won,” he posted.

Advertisement

Behind the scenes, prominent Silicon Valley figures were desperately trying to prevent Musk from appearing on an emergency episode of the podcast, according to two people familiar with the matter, out of concern that the billionaire would make the dispute even worse and poison the relationship with tech’s most powerful ally in Washington, vice-president JD Vance.

“It’s going to be a disaster with Musk in this frame of mind,” one of the people warned. 

One of the podcast co-hosts, David Sacks, was “shell-shocked”, the second person added, and needed to be protected from public scrutiny until things calmed down. Sacks, usually a frequent poster on social media, has remained silent since the Musk-Trump relationship imploded. He did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

David Sacks
David Sacks is said to be ‘shell-shocked’ by the rift © Ian Maule/AFP/Getty Images

Elsewhere, other prominent tech figures debated whether reconciliation was possible and, if not, what life beyond the break-up would look like.   

Ryan Selkis, founder of a crypto platform who became a prominent Trump backer, told the Financial Times: “Elon will be back in the fold in a matter of weeks, but it will be a chastened Elon.”

Delian Asparouhov, a space tech founder who co-runs the Hill & Valley Forum, which links Silicon Valley and Washington, said: “I don’t think there is going to be a de-escalation here.” He expressed concern to tech news site TBPN that smaller space companies that work with Musk’s SpaceX could encounter “more resistance” from the White House.

Advertisement

Others bemoaned the souring of the tech community’s Trump bet. “Maybe Silicon Valley got played by Trump. He got what he wanted,” said one West Coast venture capital founder, citing Musk’s $250mn donation to Trump’s campaign. 

The person lamented the ongoing economic volatility — caused by tariffs and Trump’s unpredictability — during a presidency that they had been promised would be a boon to business. “We’re all experiencing a liquidity crunch,” they said. “We need public markets to open.” 

Cracks in Silicon Valley and Washington’s marriage of convenience had been appearing for weeks, particularly over the Trump tax bill that so irked Musk. Deficit hawks balked at the legislation adding trillions to the US debt pile, while more socially progressive tech figures bridled at proposed cuts to entitlement programmes like Medicaid.

“I am fully for pursuing the elimination of waste and fraud,” said Jon McNeill, a former Tesla president who worked alongside Musk and now runs start-up incubator DVx Ventures. “But at the same time, I don’t want a tax break so badly as to make the most vulnerable suffer. And from what I’m hearing, a lot of my peers feel the same way.”

The public bust-up could now open the door for others in Silicon Valley to replace Musk as tech’s de facto ambassadors in Washington, especially his arch-rival, OpenAI’s Sam Altman. 

Advertisement

“Tech is not represented by one person,” an investor in Musk’s companies said. “Engagement between tech and government is not because JD is a tech guy or because Trump is, it’s because tech is so important,” they added. “This doesn’t end because of one person, even if he’s the most prominent person in the world.”

Additional reporting by Alex Rogers in Washington

Continue Reading

News

No 'going back' for Elon Musk after calling for Trump impeachment, says Steve Bannon

Published

on

No 'going back' for Elon Musk after calling for Trump impeachment, says Steve Bannon

President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference with Elon Musk in the Oval Office of the White House, Friday, May 30, in Washington.

Evan Vucci/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Evan Vucci/AP

Elon Musk “crossed the Rubicon” when he echoed sentiments on his social media platform X, calling for President Trump to be impeached, says former Trump adviser Steve Bannon.

Trump and Musk have been locked in a very public fight this week after Musk has spent days bashing the “big, beautiful bill” — a multi-trillion dollar spending bill key to unlocking the president’s agenda currently in the Senate. In return, the president threatened to cut the federal government’s contracts with Musk’s companies, including SpaceX.

Bannon told Morning Edition that “there’s no going back” for Musk after his feud with the president. The right-wing populist podcaster was an early Trump backer. Bannon served as the 2016 Trump campaign’s CEO and then went on to become chief strategist and senior adviser to the president.

Advertisement

Bannon went to prison last year for refusing to testify in a congressional investigation of Trump. He also has pleaded guilty to crimes in New York state. In January, Bannon told NPR he believed Trump would listen to the MAGA populist movement that helped him secure two presidencies over the billionaires backing his inauguration – Musk among them.

NPR reached out to Musk for comment but has not yet received a response.

Bannon discussed the public feud between Trump and Musk with NPR’s Steve Inskeep.

This interview has been lightly edited for length and clarity.

Steve Inskeep: Do you believe it is good for Trump to have this very public breakup?

Advertisement

Steve Bannon: Whether it’s good or not, it’s a reality. The president’s done gone out of his way to make sure that Elon had every opportunity, all the support, admiration, resources. [Trump] took him and his son and some of his children into his family [for] Christmas, all that. Elon asked for an extension to stay and the president denied it. And I think that was the beginning of this friction. And as I’ve said before, since December, this was inevitable. And so I just think the president needs to deal with it as a national security issue now.

Steve Bannon speaks during the Semafor World Economy Summit 2025 at Conrad Washington on April 23 in Washington, DC.

Steve Bannon speaks during the Semafor World Economy Summit 2025 at Conrad Washington on April 23 in Washington, DC.

Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images North America


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images North America

Inskeep: I think that that one thing you said there I had not specifically heard before. You believe that Elon Musk had asked for an extension of his time as a special government employee?

Bannon: Yeah, I think it’s Marc Caputo at Axios, said that Elon had asked for an extension or some sort of workaround to the limitation of his time. And it was denied. And the president said it was time to kind of move on. And also, remember, the president is sitting there saying, like, where’s the trillion dollars? You said you were going to get a trillion dollars of waste, fraud, abuse. And quite frankly, he hasn’t turned up any fraud. So there’s been a lot of tension. And Elon Musk, like the 11 year old child he is, didn’t take it very well.

Note: Axios reported on June 3 that Musk sought to remain working as a “special government employee” beyond his statutorily allowed 130-day contract but was denied. NPR has not independently confirmed this.

Advertisement

Inskeep: Is Trump really going to follow your advice to cancel his government contracts, his companies government contracts?

Bannon: Steve, look, I think that this is not personal now. I think we have as a country a national security issue here. We have an individual that The New York Times has said has a massive drug problem, and that has not been refuted. We have an individual that has a deep financial and business relationship with the Chinese Communist Party. And we know he’s asked for private briefings of top secret information. He’s also somehow involved in this invitation to President Xi Jinping to come to the inauguration. You have someone whose legal status is in question. You can’t deport people from all over the world because the Third World countries that came here at the invitation of the Biden regime and we’ve a white South African who may be here illegally were here. It’s just not right.

Note: Musk has held U.S. citizenship since 2002, according to PolitiFact. The Washington Post reported in October 2024 that Musk worked illegally in the U.S. in the late ’90s; Musk denied his work was unauthorized. The New York Times reported last month that Musk used ketamine, ecstasy, and psychedelic mushrooms during his campaigning for Trump last year. NPR has not independently confirmed the NYT’s reporting.

Inskeep: As dramatic as all of this seems right now, Bill Ackman, another billionaire in the trump coalition, said publicly they should make up. Elon seemed to agree with that. Politico is now reporting that there’s a call of some kind scheduled with the president. Is it possible this whole thing was all just a social media tempest and it’s going to blow over?

Bannon: He crossed the Rubicon. It’s one thing to make comments about spending on the bill. There’s another thing about what he did. You can’t sit there and first or try to destroy the bill. You can’t come out and say kill the present most important legislative occurrence of this first term, number one. Number two, he crossed the Rubicon by this outrageous comparison to the Epstein files about saying President Trump should be impeached, replaced by JD Vance. This is so outrageous. It has crossed the line. He’s crossed the Rubicon and there’s no going back.

Advertisement

Note: Trump is currently serving his second and final constitutionally allowed term as president. Trump told CNN Friday that he won’t speak to Musk “for a while.”

This digital story was edited by Treye Green. The radio version was edited by Reena Advani and produced by Barry Gordemer, Julie Depenbrock and Nia Dumas.

Continue Reading

News

Donald Trump attacks ‘crazy’ Elon Musk as relationship implodes

Published

on

Donald Trump attacks ‘crazy’ Elon Musk as relationship implodes

Donald Trump has attacked Elon Musk as “crazy” and threatened to rip up his government contracts, as the spat between two of the world’s most powerful men erupted into an all-out public feud.

In a flurry of bitter comments in the Oval Office and online on Thursday, the US president said he was “very disappointed” in Musk for criticising his signature tax bill, suggested he had “become hostile” after being turfed out of government, and accused the billionaire of intervening in politics to serve his business interests.

Musk, who spent more than $250mn bankrolling Trump’s re-election bid last year and said in February that he loved the president “as much as a straight man can love another man”, returned fire on X.

The billionaire called for Trump to be impeached, suggested his trade tariffs would cause a US recession, threatened to decommission SpaceX capsules used to transport Nasa astronauts and insinuated the president was associated with the late paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

The enmity deepened through the day, opening a breach that could widen long into Trump’s presidency and even influence US electoral politics, with Musk talking of starting a new party and removing Republicans from office.

Advertisement

Trump, who had previously defended Musk against charges of corruption and self-dealing, said the Tesla boss had soured on his “big beautiful bill” because it would end policies that benefited the electric-car maker.

“I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!” Trump wrote on Truth Social on Thursday afternoon.

“The easiest way to save money in our Budget . . . is to terminate Elon’s Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,” he added, in an apparent threat to end billions of dollars’ worth of business between the US government and Musk’s companies, including SpaceX and Starlink.

Musk, who is upset that the tax bill now before the Senate would increase the US deficit, accused the president of lying about his motives.

The exchanges were an extraordinary escalation of the feud between Trump and Musk, who had refrained from criticising the president directly even as he opposed the White House’s trade and tax policies.

Advertisement

The billionaire, who in April began his retreat from politics because of the “blowback” against his businesses, also suggested that he now regretted backing Trump during last year’s White House race.

“Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,” he posted on his social media site X soon after the Oval Office tirade. “Such ingratitude.”

Shares in Tesla fell by almost 11 per cent following Trump’s remarks and were down 13.5 per cent on the day, wiping more than $150bn from its market valuation — its biggest one-day drop in value ever.

Musk, the US’s largest political donor, also suggested that Republican lawmakers should side with him over the president.

“Some food for thought as they ponder this question: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years,” the billionaire wrote on X.

Advertisement

He also hit back at Trump’s suggestion that he had opposed the “big beautiful bill” because it axed tax credits for electric vehicles and clean energy, which have long benefited Tesla in the US.

“Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill,” Musk posted.

The deepening discord between Trump and “first buddy” Musk has in recent days spread through Washington.

Last week, Trump pulled the nomination of billionaire astronaut Jared Isaacman, a close ally of Musk, to lead Nasa, ostensibly over contributions he had made to Democratic candidates in the past.

Isaacman, who was on track to receive bipartisan support from the Senate, disputed the White House’s justification for the decision.

Advertisement

“I don’t think the timing was much of a coincidence,” Isaacman told the All-In podcast on Wednesday. “There [were] some people that had some axes to grind, I guess, and I was a good, visible target.”

Musk had already announced that he was stepping back from his involvement in the Trump administration, where he had led the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (Doge).

Steve Davis, one of Musk’s lieutenants at SpaceX who led Doge on a day-to-day basis, had also now left the administration, according to a government official.

More senior figures close to the billionaire were set to abandon the initiative in the coming days, the official said.

Musk himself has suggested that the tax bill would wipe out any savings made by Doge, which claims to have identified roughly $180bn in cuts to date. On Wednesday, the congressional fiscal watchdog said the legislation would add $2.4tn to the US debt by 2034.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending