Within the USA, although, residents who establish with their Russian heritage and people who establish with their Ukrainian heritage categorical strikingly comparable views in regards to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, a pair of unique USA TODAY/Suffolk College polls finds. The 2 teams are united of their opposition to Russian President Vladimir Putin and the warfare raging on his orders.
The invasion is opposed by almost everybody in each teams: 87% of Russian Individuals and 94% of Ukrainian Individuals. These of Russian descent have a extra optimistic view of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy (72%) than they do of Putin (6%). By 9-1, they are saying Putin needs to be faraway from workplace.
“Any person simply must extract him,” says Dina Sarkisova, 44, who owns a spa in San Diego and took part within the survey. Half-Russian and half-Azeri, she got here to the USA as a refugee in 1990, fleeing battle in Azerbaijan because the Soviet Union collapsed. “There is not any reasoning with him.”
Extra:Biden says the Ukraine disaster reveals why the US should develop into vitality impartial. Is that potential?
Advertisement
“It is a travesty; it is a nightmare,” says Jacob Plotkin, 68, a Ukrainian American from Boca Raton, Florida, who works in actual property and agreed to a follow-up interview after being polled. “A giant man selecting on just a little child. It is mistaken.”
The outrage of Ukrainian Individuals is not any shock as they watch their homeland hammered by a Russian onslaught of tanks and missiles. However there’s additionally sturdy help amongst Russian Individuals for sending army {hardware} for use in opposition to Russians on the battlefield (55%) and for imposing very strict financial sanctions (59%) that may damage those that dwell in Russia, together with members of their households.
Most of the Russians immigrated to the USA to flee the Soviet Union and the communist system Putin has defended. The ballot findings underscore his isolation not solely amongst international leaders but in addition amongst these with roots in his nation.
“For the reason that Russian Federation invaded Ukraine Feb. 24, some Russian eating places and companies all through the USA have been boycotted or vandalized by Individuals indignant with Putin’s invasion of Ukraine,” says David Paleologos, director of the Suffolk Political Analysis Middle. “But of their frustration with the warfare, Individuals’ anger could also be misdirected at different Individuals who share these very frustrations.”
USA TODAY and Suffolk College surveyed 500 U.S. residents who establish with their Russian heritage and 500 residents who establish with their Ukrainian heritage. Some are Americans and a few are usually not. The polls, taken by landline and cellphone March 5-10, have margins of error of plus or minus 4.4 proportion factors.
Distant and near residence
The warfare isn’t a distant debate for a lot of of these known as within the ballot. Practically half of these of Ukrainian descent (48%) report having relations preventing in Ukraine. So do 1 in 5 (19%) of these of Russian descent.
Advertisement
Olga Rudenko, 49, an artist who emigrated from Ukraine in 2002 and lives in Harlem, has loaded on her telephone the Ukrainian air alerts that warn of approaching assaults there.
Extra:Ballot takeaways: What one phrase describes Putin? We requested. The solutions weren’t fairly.
Extra:David Paleologos: Anger at Russian Individuals misdirected since most additionally scorn Putin over Ukraine warfare
“So I do know when my mother must go to the shelter and what is going on on,” she says, “as a result of I must test within the morning if she’s alive, if she was not bombed.” Her mom does not have a smartphone, so Rudenko checks on her by means of an aunt who lives in one other Ukrainian city.
She begins to cry as she talks about her household, then stops herself. “I haven’t got any proper to cry,” she says. “I am not the one who’s bombed.”
Advertisement
Oil, gold, commerce: Congress is on the lookout for choices to punish Russia for invading Ukraine
There are variations between Russian Individuals and Ukrainian Individuals on some points, together with whether or not an increasing NATO represents a risk to Russian safety, an argument that Putin made to defend the invasion. Those that establish with their Ukrainian heritage say by almost 3-1 (63%-22%) that NATO doesn’t pose a risk. Those that establish with their Russian heritage are extra intently divided: 38% say it does; 48% say it does not.
“This can be a major problem from the angle of Russians as a result of clearly you do not need your capital, to not point out a few of your different main inhabitants facilities, in shut missile vary to NATO,” says Artem Joukov, 31, a doctoral candidate on the College of Texas at Dallas who emigrated from Russia as a baby.
He does not see stakes for the USA that warrant imposing sanctions and deploying further troops to Japanese Europe. “It’s potential in international coverage to not take a place,” he says.
Victor Shevchuk, 53, an engineer from Richardson, Texas, who’s Ukrainian American, says that as a sovereign nation, Ukraine ought to have the ability to make its personal selections on whether or not to hitch NATO.
Advertisement
“It is a very complicated and tough scenario, being particularly that Russia has nuclear energy and that Vladimir Putin appears to be a bit unhinged,” he says. “I would prefer to see us assist Ukraine as a lot as potential with out triggering WWIII.”
Extra:Putin warfare crimes in Ukraine can be investigated, however Russian leaders unlikely to be prosecuted
Within the face of Ukrainian resistance, Putin has moved to “an increasing number of excessive measures,” he says.
The invasion of Ukraine has soured the views of many Russian Individuals towards Putin. Practically two-thirds (63%) say their view of him is worse than earlier than the assaults in February. Among the many respondents who’ve talked with members of the family within the area in current weeks, 7 in 10 say these relations had a typically unfavorable view of Putin.
Ninety p.c of the Ukrainian Individuals and 70% of the Russian Individuals say Putin needs to be charged with warfare crimes.
Advertisement
Is the US doing sufficient?
A lot of these surveyed need the USA to do extra.
Half of Russian Individuals say the USA isn’t doing sufficient within the battle; 7 of 10 Ukrainian Individuals agree. Simply 13% of Russian Individuals and a pair of% of Ukrainian Individuals say the USA is doing an excessive amount of.
President Joe Biden will get mediocre approval scores for his dealing with of the battle: 40% approve-43% disapprove amongst these of Russian descent; 35% approve-49% disapprove amongst these of Ukrainian descent.
“We want a pacesetter, not a tip-toer,” says Tara Shvetzov, who lives in Beeville in South Texas. Her father immigrated from Russia. A veteran of the U.S. Military who served within the Iraq Battle, she says the botched U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan final 12 months might have opened the door for the invasion of Ukraine. “It provides the bullies that chance to say ‘They present weak point, and we make the most of that weak point,’” she says.
Most of these surveyed, 67% of the Russian Individuals and 57% of the Ukrainian Individuals, predict the disaster in Ukraine is the beginning of a brand new Chilly Battle between the USA and Russia. Or worse: Two-thirds of every group are “very” or “considerably” frightened that direct army confrontationbetween the 2 nations may very well be sparked.
Advertisement
Yevgeniya Valchuk, 39, who moved to the USA 15 years in the past and lives in San Francisco, calls the Russian invasion inevitable.
“All people in Ukraine knew it might occur,” she says, “primarily based on the historical past that Ukraine has and the way the Russians behave and the way the Russian president behaved inside the final 30 years.” She notes Putin’s aggressive actions in Syria and elsewhere.
“He took every thing what he wished, and proper now the one one that’s standing is Ukraine,” she says.
These on the battlefield standing in opposition to him embody her youthful brother and sister.
new video loaded: Community L.A. Fire Brigade Steps In to Help Evacuate Residents
transcript
transcript
Community L.A. Fire Brigade Steps In to Help Evacuate Residents
Deep into the evacuation zone, volunteers are stepping in to evacuate L.A. residents from encroaching wildfires. Armed with radios, hoses and knowledge of the area, this brigade offers help to overextended fire departments as they try to reach people who have yet to flee.
“Top is Yankee.” “Victor’s your side. Yankee is the other side of Topanga, OK?” Community fire brigade volunteers are on the streets of Topanga, California. The Palisades fire was encroaching on this home, and Keegan Gibbs and his team were working to evacuate the owner. “OK, hi. So I gotta do this fast, so.” “I honestly just kind of want you to leave, because it’s getting bad.” “No we’re out of here in five minutes.” The brigade works to back up the fire department when resources are stretched thin. “L.A. County and the other supporting agencies are the best in the world at what they do. Events like this, it’s not enough.” The Palisades fire has now been burning for several days, and has destroyed tens of thousands of acres. “It makes no sense for somebody to try to stay here. It’s so unbelievably dangerous.” “I walked kind of with Keegan a little bit. We were going to stay, probably going to stay for a little while, but we walked the property and it’s just almost like, I just don’t think it’s safe. Can you just open that? I’m want to throw some more stuff in here, and then we’ll be good. Just going to put pictures, important memorabilia.” “There’s a huge denial that people won’t be affected by fire, and we have to be advocates for people to realize and accept that risk.” With firefighters still unable to contain two of the region’s largest fires, more L.A. residents are expected to join the tens of thousands who have already been forced to evacuate. “Our mission is to make sure people are safe, just full stop.”
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.
Chinese chipmakers and technology companies are heading to Malaysia in droves, its economy minister Rafizi Ramli said, as Beijing prepares to face more tariffs when Donald Trump returns as US president this month.
The moves by Chinese companies, which are expected to result in billions of dollars of investment in Malaysia in the coming years, would rival the US companies that have dominated the country’s market, he said.
“Chinese [companies] are very keen to go outside and expand beyond their domestic market,” Rafizi told the Financial Times in an interview. “Those companies are now looking at relocating or expanding into Malaysia.”
Advertisement
Trump has threatened to impose 60 per cent tariffs on Chinese imports when he re-enters the White House on January 20, rattling investors and putting companies on alert to restructure their supply chains.
Malaysia has been a big beneficiary over the past decade of such “China-plus-one” strategies, where multinational companies complement their Chinese operations with investments in regional countries to diversify risk and lower costs.
It has also positioned itself as a crucial player in global supply chains for high-tech industries such as artificial intelligence, with long-standing semiconductor manufacturing operations in Penang in the north and a burgeoning hub for data centres in the southern state of Johor.
US companies have dominated these sectors in Malaysia, but Rafizi said he expected a wave of Chinese investment on the back of initiatives his government was putting in place to develop the industries further.
Joe Biden’s administration has restricted sales of advanced chips by US companies to China, posing a potential threat to their investments in Malaysia, where many of the products are manufactured, and opening the door for Chinese competitors.
Advertisement
Rafizi said he made a 10-day trip in June to China, where he met 100 AI, tech and biomedical companies to assess their appetite for investing in Malaysia. He added that these efforts had resulted in two investment delegations from China in the past few months.
“Chinese investments usually come with their own ecosystem,” he said. “We will be seeing more and more, especially if we can secure the first two or three anchor investors from China.”
He added that many companies were also seeking to increase exposure to the fast-growing south-east Asian market as China’s economic momentum slows and trade with the US faces additional barriers.
This week, Malaysia signed an agreement with Singapore to create a vast special economic zone between the two countries. Malaysia hopes the initiative will add $26bn a year to its economy by 2030, bringing in 20,000 skilled jobs and 50 new projects.
Between 2019 and 2023, Malaysia attracted $21bn of investment into its semiconductor industry and $10bn into data centres — the storage facilities that enable fast-growing technologies such as AI, cloud computing and cryptocurrency mining. In the past year alone, US tech companies Amazon, Nvidia, Google and Microsoft committed nearly $16bn, mostly for data centres in Johor.
Advertisement
TikTok owner ByteDance is the largest Chinese group to invest in Johor, with a $2bn commitment last year.
Rafizi said that while historically, Malaysia had been happy to accept any foreign investment, it was becoming more selective as it sought to contribute more value to the products and services it produced.
He added that while increasing US-China tensions would harm global trade, it could prompt Chinese companies to give Malaysia a bigger role in chip design, rather than just manufacturing, which would generate more income as the country climbed the value chain.
“The unintended consequence of some tariff measures targeted at Chinese companies basically helps countries like Malaysia to weed out the more genuine and long-term investments from China compared to the ones that just look to use Malaysia as a manufacturing outpost,” he said.
Boar’s Head meats are displayed at a Safeway store on July 31, 2024 in San Rafael, Calif. The USDA released a new report on what led to the listeria outbreak.
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Advertisement
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
A U.S. Department of Agriculture report has found that “inadequate sanitation practices” at a Boar’s Head facility in Virginia contributed to a listeria outbreak that left 10 people dead and dozens hospitalized around the country last year.
The report, released Friday by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), reviewed the listeria outbreak linked to the deli meat supplier’s facility in Jarratt, Va.
In one case, inspectors said they found “meat and fat residue from the previous day’s production on the equipment, including packaging equipment.” Other instances included dripping condensation “on exposed product” and “cracks, holes and broken flooring that could hold moisture and contribute to wet conditions.”
Advertisement
The outbreak lasted from July through November 2024, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. With cases reported in over 19 states, it was the largest outbreak of the foodborne bacterial illness since 2011.
In an email to NPR, a spokesperson for Boar’s Head said: “We continue to actively cooperate with the USDA and government regulatory agencies on matters related to last year’s recall, and we thank them for their oversight.”
In addition, the spokesperson said the company is working to implement enhanced food safety programs, “including stronger food safety control procedures and more rigorous testing at our meat and poultry production facilities.”
Boar’s Head recalled its ready-to-eat liverwurst products linked to the outbreak in July. The recall later expanded to dozens of products, including sliced hams and sausages, all of which were manufactured at the Virginia plant.
USDA inspection reports show sanitation violations were routine and not isolated at the plant, NPR previously reported. The reports found dead bugs, dripping ceilings, mildew and black mold near machines at the plant.
Advertisement
In September, Boar’s Head permanently closed its Jarratt plant and the company announced it would discontinue making any liverwurst products.
Friday’s report also included a review of FSIS’s own practices and procedures to prevent the spread of listeria, including ways to enhance its regulatory and sampling approach to the illness. The report cited “equipping FSIS inspectors with updated training and tools to recognize and respond to systemic food safety issues” as one of the steps the agency would take to protect the public from listeria.