Connect with us

News

Russia turns to Syria playbook with shifting claims over grounds for war

Published

on

As Russia started to construct a pretext for struggle with Ukraine in February, it accused Kyiv of firing into Russian soil and blowing up a distant border checkpoint — albeit with no reported casualties.

Now, as its forces lay siege to Ukrainian cities with rising brutality, Moscow has justified its invasion by citing fears that Ukraine was restarting its nuclear weapons programme. Russia additionally claimed to have discovered paperwork displaying Ukraine had developed chemical and organic weapons underneath the orders of “curators from the Pentagon”.

Russia’s causes for launching the struggle, nonetheless, are ever evolving. They now embrace accusations Ukraine was creating ethnically focused bioweapons to bloodbath Slavs and that Kyiv had researched the bat coronavirus in methods suggesting it might have been accountable for the Covid-19 pandemic.

Ukraine and its western allies worry the claims could possibly be laying the groundwork for a grisly new Russian assault.

“We’re accused of assaults on allegedly peaceable Russia. And now what?” Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky stated in a video handle on Thursday. “What else have you ever ready for us? The place will you strike with chemical weapons?”

Advertisement

Specialists have drawn parallels with Moscow’s assist for President Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria. There, Russia typically blamed chemical weapons assaults that hit opposition areas on the rebels themselves. Analysts now say Russia could also be pre-emptively creating an analogous narrative about Ukraine to justify extra aggressive assaults.

“Primarily, the sport right here is to create a story the place you’re arguing that your opponent is about to make use of these heinous weapons to justify brutal navy motion towards them,” stated Hanna Notte, a senior analysis affiliate on the Vienna Heart for Disarmament and Non-Proliferation.

“If we’re shifting in the direction of an assault on Kyiv or on different main Ukrainian cities within the coming days then this narrative could possibly be a part of laying the groundwork for that.”

Russia’s messaging round chemical weapons carries robust echoes of a fuel assault in rebel-held suburbs in Damascus in 2013. In an opinion piece within the New York Instances, President Vladimir Putin argued that rebels had staged a false-flag assault to encourage worldwide intervention, after US president Barack Obama had known as chemical weapons his “pink line” in Syria.

A Syrian man receiving oxygen after a nerve fuel assault within the Damascus suburbs in 2013. Russia’s messaging round chemical weapons carries robust echoes of the assault © Ammar Dar/Reuters

Chemical weapons strikes re-emerged years later after Russia had intervened militarily in Syria on Assad’s behalf. Chemical weapons analysts blamed Assad forces for many of those assaults. However Russian officers stated not solely that the assaults have been false flags, in addition they insisted some have been staged.

Advertisement

Moscow’s arguments performed into scepticism about US justifications for struggle, after Washington justified the 2003 Iraq invasion by alleging that Baghdad was creating weapons of mass destruction, claims that turned out to be false.

Now, the rhetoric seems to have resurfaced in Ukraine, in keeping with Tobias Schneider, a fellow on the International Public Coverage Institute who has researched chemical weapons in Syria.

“What it seems like is that the individuals the Russians have engaged on Ukraine merely opened the playbook and pulled out the outdated tropes they’d been utilizing for years — and significantly those the west had already used towards them,” Schneider stated.

Russia’s accusations to justify the struggle have shifted after it failed to realize the fast victory it seems to have anticipated.

Moscow initially stated it was defending Russian-speaking Ukrainians from a US-backed “neo-Nazi” regime and had acted after studying of plans to assault Russia. Later Russia started to assert that Ukraine was set on restarting its nuclear programme and that its “capabilities have been a lot larger than these of Iran or North Korea”.

Advertisement

On March 6 these claims disappeared from Russian state media in favour of a brand new narrative: Russia claimed to have found Ukrainian work on “bioagents able to infecting particular ethnic teams” and research on the migratory routes of birds that would carry the deathly pathogens into Russian territory.

Three days later Russia stated “Ukrainian nationalists” had stashed 80 tonnes of ammonia close to Kharkiv, a metropolis badly hit by Russia’s siege, “in preparation for a provocation utilizing toxic substances to accuse Russia of supposedly utilizing chemical weapons”.

Apartments damaged by shelling in Kharkiv.
Flats broken by shelling in Kharkiv. Russia stated ‘Ukrainian nationalists’ had stashed 80 tonnes of ammonia close to town © Andrew Marienko/AP

Organic weapons seem to have grown within the Kremlin’s evaluation of the threats it faces, although Moscow has supplied little proof.

Nikolai Patrushev, the secretary of Russia’s safety council, stated final yr that US-controlled bioweapons amenities have been “rising as if on yeast [ . . .] by some unusual coincidence, largely on the Russian and Chinese language borders”.

Moscow has repeatedly accused the US since 2018 of creating organic weapons in a lab in Georgia, which misplaced a five-day struggle with Russia in 2008. Gennady Zyuganov, the chief of Russia’s Communist get together, claimed this week that American scientists wished “to poison all the pieces Russian and eradicate our nation”.

Because the struggle continues the assorted Russian claims assist the Kremlin inform its inhabitants that it had acted to guard them from Ukrainian threats, stated Alexander Gabuev, a senior fellow on the Carnegie Moscow Centre.

Advertisement

“It’s crucial to clarify that it’s a preventive struggle,” Gabuev stated.

On Friday, Russia took its declare to the UN, the place Vasily Nebeznya, its ambassador, accused the US and Ukraine of utilizing birds, bats and bugs to ship “harmful pathogens” round Europe. His western counterparts rejected the declare, which they stated they feared might preclude a “false flag assault” in Ukraine.

However the notions alone have superior Russia’s trigger, Schneider stated.

“For them, the very fact of it being true or not doesn’t matter, and I feel they assume the Individuals are precisely the identical method,” Schneider added. “What it does is present them [with] leverage . . . they’ll use this to play video games on the UN or the OPCW.”

It additionally “merely muddies the waters on each stage,” he stated. “When you maintain utilizing this narrative that was utilized in Syria, you allow individuals pondering that [these accusations are] simply thrown round in each struggle. Who is aware of what’s true?”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Judge pauses deadlines in Trump classified documents case over immunity questions

Published

on

Judge pauses deadlines in Trump classified documents case over immunity questions

Former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a rally at Greenbrier Farms on June 28 in Chesapeake, Va. The judge in the classified documents case against him has paused some deadlines.

Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

The federal judge overseeing the classified documents case against former President Donald Trump has paused a few deadlines after Trump’s legal team requested a review of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on presidential immunity.

On Friday, Trump’s legal team presented a filing to the court that said this week’s ruling from the nation’s high court means he has blanket immunity from prosecution for his “official acts.” As part of an effort to have the case dismissed, attorneys for the former president asked Judge Aileen Cannon to rule whether or not the conduct involved was official.

Trump’s legal team had also asked to argue the immunity issue before Cannon between now and early September, which would have effectively delayed all aspects of the case for at least two months.

Advertisement

Cannon’s order issued Saturday does not give a date for any discussion of the immunity issue to be held, but does allow for a short pause related to two deadlines for Trump’s lawyers and one deadline for prosecutors. The order gives federal prosecutors until July 18 to respond to Trump’s request for an extended delay. Trump’s legal team will then be due to reply to the prosecution on July 21.

Trump has argued that his removal of classified documents from the White House and then relocating them to his Florida resort home at Mar-a-Lago constituted an official act — and that the Supreme Court’s ruling should translate to charges brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith being dropped.

In Friday’s court filing, attorneys for Trump also pointed to Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurring opinion in the immunity decision, which questioned Smith’s appointment and authority in the classified documents case. Trump’s team also has sought to have the case dismissed on those grounds, arguing that Smith’s appointment is unconstitutional.

Smith has said the Supreme Court’s decision does not apply to the classified documents case because the documents were taken as Trump was leaving office — and that the former president obstructed FBI investigators from recovering them from Mar-a-Lago once he was no longer president.

Cannon has yet to set a date for a trial in the case. The Trump appointee has been criticized for indefinitely suspending the start date for the trial after announcing she needed more time to examine pretrial motions from the former president’s legal team requesting that the case be dismissed.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Marine Le Pen’s party in talks to join Viktor Orbán’s group in European parliament

Published

on

Marine Le Pen’s party in talks to join Viktor Orbán’s group in European parliament

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

France’s Rassemblement National is in talks to join a new group with Hungary’s Viktor Orbán in the European parliament as far-right parties are jostling to convert their votes into power.

The RN, which is forecast to win the most seats in Sunday’s French legislative elections, will decide whether to ally with the Patriots for Europe group on Monday, three people familiar with the situation told the Financial Times.

Orbán’s Patriots group on Saturday gained its seventh member party, meeting the threshold to form an official faction under the EU parliament’s rules.

Advertisement

If the RN joins with its 30 MEPs, the Patriots are likely to overtake the right-wing European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) to become the third-largest group in parliament.

Vox, the Spanish hard-right party that counts six MEPs, quit ECR for the Patriots on Friday. The Freedom party of Geert Wilders in the Netherlands and the Danish People’s party, which have seven MEPs between them, also said they would join the Patriots.

The ECR, dominated by Italian PM Giorgia Meloni’s Brothers of Italy party, relegated the Renew group built around Emmanuel Macron’s centrists into fourth position last month, but has now dropped to 78 members. Renew has 76 members.

But the proliferation of right-wing groups also means their dreams of a super-merger that would wield significant power in the EU assembly appear to be over.

“Anything that furthers the interests of Patriots in the EU parliament is good for us. Orbán is a fine politician who has the skills to operate at the EU level,” said one RN official.

Advertisement

Zoltán Kóvacs, Orbán’s spokesman, told journalists to “stay alert in the next few days”.

Alternative for Germany leader Alice Weidel, whose MEPs were expelled from the outgoing Identity and Democracy group dominated by the RN, told the FT last week she was also seeking to form a group — potentially based on the remains of ID.

But it remains unclear whether the AfD will manage to secure MEPs from enough countries, given that four parties have now left ID for the Patriots.

Russia is the main dividing line between the Patriots and AfD on the one hand, and the ECR on the other. Meloni is a strong defender of Ukraine, while Orbán, Le Pen and Weidel have traditionally held more pro-Moscow views.

The Hungarian leader met Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Friday, causing outcry among EU leaders who said he did not represent them, just after he made a surprise visit to Kyiv on Monday.

Advertisement

On Wednesday the Russian foreign ministry posted on social media what appeared to be a congratulatory message for the RN, featuring a photo of Le Pen celebrating her first-round victory.

“The people of France are seeking a sovereign foreign policy that serves their national interests and a break from the dictate of Washington and Brussels,” said the post. 

Le Pen, who has long tried to counter criticism that she is too pro-Russia, criticised the post on TF1 news on Thursday. “I absolutely do not feel responsible for Russian provocations towards France,” she said, adding it was “a form of interference”.  

However, Orbán said earlier this week he was confident the Patriots group would grow “faster than anyone thinks now” after the second round of the French elections.

“You will see . . . those who promised to join and create a pan-European faction, the third largest, then the second largest. Later we will attempt to be the largest but that won’t be this year.”

Advertisement

He will combine his group’s power in parliament with his country having just taken the six-month rotating presidency of the bloc, which allows his ministers to set the agenda of meetings.

The centre-right European People’s party is the largest in the 720-strong parliament with 188 members, followed by the centre-left Socialists and Democrats, with 136. Party size dictates how many coveted positions such as committee chairs and vice-presidents they get. 

However, MEPs still vote on the positions, and the pro-European majority, including Renew, the Greens and other parties, operates a “cordon sanitaire” to reject any far-right candidates. They also voted to divvy up committee chairmanships based on group size on July 4, before the Patriots are constituted.  

The ECR secured one committee chair and one vice-president during the last term because they came from its more moderate parties.

“No one beyond the cordon sanitaire can chair a committee,” senior Socialist MEP Alex Agius Saliba told the FT. 

Advertisement

But János Bóka, Hungary’s Europe minister, told journalists that there would be “an institutionally and politically strengthened right in the European parliament and in an ideal world, this should be reflected in the distribution of positions”.

Video: Why the far right is surging in Europe | FT Film
Continue Reading

News

Judge Aileen Cannon grants Trump's request to pause some deadlines in classified documents case amid immunity questions

Published

on

Judge Aileen Cannon grants Trump's request to pause some deadlines in classified documents case amid immunity questions

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon on Saturday granted former President Donald Trump’s request for further briefing on the issue of presidential immunity in the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case and delayed certain deadlines.

Cannon’s order marks the latest fallout from the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity decision on Monday, which ruled that Trump has immunity from prosecution for some conduct as president in the federal election interference case.

In the order, Cannon afforded special counsel Jack Smith the right, but not the obligation, to file a submission on the use of classified information at trial. At the same time, she paused two upcoming deadlines for Trump and his co-defendants.

Smith’s brief is now due on July 18, and a reply from Trump’s team is due on July 21.

Neither Trump’s lawyers nor the Department of Justice immediately responded to a request for comment Saturday afternoon.

Advertisement

There is no trial date in sight in the classified documents case. Trump has pleaded not guilty to all charges.

The latest development comes after Trump’s attorneys on Friday asked Cannon to pause court proceedings and consider how the Supreme Court’s ruling affects the case. Trump’s team in February had also filed a motion to dismiss the indictment on immunity grounds.

Saturday’s order also makes Trump’s team busier — at least in the short term — as it attempts to minimize or outright dismiss two of the three other criminal cases pending against him.

Through an order earlier this week, Judge Juan Merchan, who presided over Trump’s criminal hush money trial earlier this year, stayed Trump’s July 11 sentencing hearing to allow for briefing on Trump’s motion to set aside the verdict in that trial.

Trump’s brief, which is expected to focus on evidence involving his official acts admitted during the trial to prove his knowledge and intent, is due on July 11. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s response is due on July 24.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending