Connect with us

News

Retired Army major general: The Russian military invasion has peaked

Published

on

Retired Army major general: The Russian military invasion has peaked

In interviews Thursday and Friday, the previous commander of the US Particular Operations Command in Europe, retired US Military Main Basic Mike Repass, gave his well-informed view of the warfare in Ukraine. For the previous six years, he has suggested the Ukrainian navy on a US authorities contract.

Whereas the Russians could also be slowed down, Repass says, the Ukrainian facet can be beneath nice stress. He stated that the Ukrainian counterattacks in current days could also be much less efficient than the media protection has prompt. And he says it is also not clear what number of casualties the Ukrainians have incurred, which makes any form of correct evaluation of how they’re faring troublesome to do.

Repass additionally contends that the Ukrainians want extra S-300 missiles able to bringing down mid-to-high-altitude jets and ballistic missiles, which might fall beneath the brink of instituting a proper no-fly zone requested by the Ukrainians, which the US has rejected. And Repass says that he believes that Putin’s “must-haves” within the battle are securing a land bridge connecting Russia to Crimea on the Black Sea and pushing out the boundaries across the two Russian-proclaimed “republics” of Luhansk and Donetsk within the Donbas area of jap Ukraine.

Disclosure: Repass is on the advisory council of the International Particular Operations Basis, the place I’m the chairman of the board. Our dialog was edited for readability and size.

Mike Repass: The Russians culminated about 5 days in the past. Within the navy vernacular, “end result” means you now not have ample fight energy to proceed to advance within the offense. I imagine that the Ukrainians sensed that and began conducting native counterattacks, notably to the north and west of Kyiv. Additionally they began counterattacks within the east not too long ago. The Ukrainians went on the counteroffensive, however in a restricted approach. They took the city of Irpin to the west of Kyiv and another cities, however the information protection of the counterattacks has, I believe, surpassed the precise results of these operations on the bottom.

Advertisement

I am involved that it is not a big counterattack as a result of maybe the Ukrainians do not have sufficient forces to launch one. So, if they cannot muster a bigger counterattack round Kyiv, they could have a tough time gathering sufficient forces to push the Russians again within the east close to Donbas.

We actually do not know what is going on on, on the bottom, in granular element, so it is laborious to guage the Ukrainian ways and capabilities, and — that is extra vital — we do not know what the Ukrainian losses have been up to now. If this devolves right into a battle of attrition between each side and we do not know what the prices to the Ukrainians have been, our evaluation about what’s going on might be considerably shallow, fairly frankly.

BERGEN: What do you make of the peace talks?

REPASS: I believe it is a Russian delaying tactic as a result of they haven’t established passable info on the bottom. They are not able to cease combating as a result of they do not have what they want or need. Sadly, I believe there might be far more struggling and destruction in Ukraine earlier than there’s a ceasefire or peace settlement.

BERGEN: There seems to have been an assault on a gas depot in Russia on Friday, which the Kremlin has blamed on the Ukrainians. What do make of this?

REPASS: The Belgorod strike is extraordinary for my part. Assuming that it was carried out by the Ukrainians, the operation put Russia on discover that their earlier sanctuary within the homeland is now doubtlessly in danger. (Ukraine’s Safety Council Secretary denied duty for the assault hours after the Ukrainian protection ministry spokesperson stated he would neither affirm nor deny Ukraine’s function.) They’ll now not have freedom of unrestricted motion in what was beforehand thought-about secure rear areas. Russia should divert navy belongings which might be presently employed in Ukraine to safe their crucial belongings and capabilities on Russian soil. Additional, the assault destroyed critically wanted gas and different assets wanted for the Russians’ faltering struggle in Ukraine, which will definitely amplify their logistics challenges. Psychologically, it’s one other blow to Russia’s sense of invincibility.

BERGEN: Is there something that shocked you within the final month?

Advertisement
Opinion: Sasha's story brought the Ukraine war home to me in a shattering way
REPASS: Sadly, the largest shock is the willingness of Russia to destroy all the things. Russia is utilizing unrestricted warfare, wanting nuclear warfare, and we have not seen this in Europe through the trendy period. The one different locations that we have seen it’s Russia’s warfare in Grozny after which the Russians repeated it in Homs and Aleppo in Syria. Each of these cities are historical and have archeological significance, and the Russians destroyed each. And Putin did it with out penalty or repercussions for his unrestricted use of power to destroy whole cities, together with landmarks of cultural and historic significance. Now, he is destroying Mariupol. He is after Kharkiv, and he’ll do the identical there and with the opposite cities that he is encircled, if he is given an opportunity.

So the unrestricted brutality that Russia is prepared to make use of in Ukraine has shocked me, given the prewar Russian rhetoric of “We’re brothers,” “We’re cousins,” “We’re one individuals.” Nevertheless it’s clear to me that what Putin’s going for — the annihilation of the indigenous inhabitants — is as a result of he does not need any potential resistance actions in these cities. Mariupol particularly could possibly be a base for resistance within the midst of his try to safe a land bridge from Donbas right down to Crimea.

BERGEN: As the previous commander of US Particular Operations in Europe, how would you fee the Ukrainian Particular Forces?

REPASS: They’ve 5 regiments of Ukrainian Particular Operations Forces, they usually have been in various levels of readiness and functionality previous to the warfare. There are some that have been NATO-interoperable and a few that have been lower than these requirements. There are different Particular Operations Forces items as nicely, such because the SBU-Alpha troops from the Safety Service of Ukraine, which might be fairly darn good. Additionally they have particular forces within the State Border Guards.

The Ukrainian legislation on territorial protection, which went into impact in January, directed the Particular Operations Forces to be answerable for the nationwide resistance effort. I do know that the resistance forces and territorials have been very energetic within the Russian rear areas. They do not have the numbers or the fight functionality to go head-to-head with a Russian battalion tactical group, so they have a tendency to have interaction the rear echelons of help troops and forces.
BERGEN: There are reviews of seven Russian generals killed in Ukraine: What does that say to you, and the way uncommon is it?

REPASS: It is exceedingly uncommon within the trendy period. What it tells me is that their command and management processes are very poor. It’s also a operate of know-how and group. On the group facet, the Russians created battalion tactical teams as their main war-fighting formations with vastly totally different armaments and levels of auto mobility. To make use of their capabilities correctly, they should string them out throughout the battlefield in depth, however they do not have the know-how and procedures for arranging these forces in the way in which they should. This drawback is compounded by the poor infrastructure, which forces the armored and heavy autos to stay on the restricted and slim roads. Consequently, tactical engagements trigger site visitors jams, that are exacerbated by unhealthy radio communication techniques. Together, the scenario requires the senior leaders to go ahead to unscrew issues, which makes them susceptible to artillery and sniper hearth.

Why Russia's elite are the key to Putin's downfall
BERGEN: Are you shocked that the Russians are typically speaking within the clear on radios or cell telephones?

REPASS: Sure, it does shock me, nevertheless it’s simply proof that their command-and-control capabilities are inadequate for the way in which they’re organized.

BERGEN: The physique baggage will begin going again to Russia and the funerals will begin occurring. Does Putin care?

REPASS: I believe the consensus amongst Russia watchers is he both does not know or does not give a rattling. He is impervious to home opinion as a result of he is so totally insulated from what is going on on domestically. He has a circle of trusted advisers and folks round him that he pays consideration to, after which he has his very tight circle of safety that ensures that he is nicely protected. Including to his isolation, Putin has stated himself that he barely makes use of the web.

He is knowledgeable by his personal state media, which has solely state-approved messages to report. He is residing in an echo chamber, they usually’re not going to report the unhealthy information.

Advertisement
Once we see this current reporting by US, British and Australian channels that he did not perceive that he was utilizing conscripts, does not perceive how badly the Russian navy is performing, these reviews appear to be confirmatory proof that he is insulated from the info on the bottom at house and in Ukraine.
BERGEN: You have been part of a bunch of retired senior US navy and senior Japanese European navy leaders that launched an open letter on March 9 urging that the Ukrainians be armed with S-300 missiles. Your purpose for advocating for the S-300s is they’d be beneath the brink of organising a proper no-fly zone, but would nonetheless intercept mid-to-high-altitude jets and ballistic missiles?

REPASS: Proper. In case you have been capable of obtain a no-fly zone by your individual air protection capabilities, then maybe there would not be such a political demand from the Ukrainians — “Give us MiG fighters. Give us a no-fly zone.” So, it was considerably supportive of the administration’s place on not instituting a proper no-fly zone, whereas additionally supporting the precise necessities on the bottom in Ukraine.

BERGEN: And the Ukrainians know methods to use the S-300s?

Opinion: Even Russia's ruthless war in Ukraine can't get Trump to give up his Putin fixation

REPASS: Completely. They’re utilizing those that they do should good impact already.

BERGEN: On NATO, how would you fee its response?

REPASS: The reply to that is dependent upon the place you sit. In case you’re in Kyiv, you’ll be very pissed off. They’re genuinely and really appreciative of the help they’ve acquired from all of the donor nations. However they anticipated extra help from NATO. There are two various things at play right here. The group, NATO, shouldn’t be engaged in actions to immediately help Ukrainian operations. They’re rhetorically and politically supporting what particular person nations are doing to help Ukraine, however these nations are coordinating amongst one another versus coordinating help actions by the NATO alliance construction.

The Ukrainians have a number of lists of issues that they want, however they have to undergo a quite bureaucratic course of to amass them. In some instances, the donor nations are shifting on the pace of course of quite than on the pace of warfare.

Advertisement
I will provide you with an instance: Stage IV physique armor is able to withstanding one or two photographs from a Soviet-type spherical. That know-how is managed by the State Division for US export. The Ukrainians will let you know, “Hey, we now have the cash to pay for these items. We’re not asking you to provide it to us. We’re asking you to promote it to us expeditiously.” Nonetheless, the availability of Stage IV physique armor is topic to a prolonged course of to get US approval for supply to Ukraine. It’s late-to-need consequently.

BERGEN: Do you might have different issues?

REPASS: What in regards to the pending humanitarian catastrophe that is going to occur in Russia with meals shortages and different points which might be arising? In all probability by June, there’s going to be a considerable humanitarian problem in Russia, and the West can be nicely served to start out speaking about this now.

They’ve stopped exporting commodities out of Russia. They’ve already began rationing some meals gadgets like sugar. If the home scenario will get significantly destabilized as a consequence of shortages of meals and important commodities, then maybe the ruling elites will grow to be unpredictable and determined to keep up their maintain on energy. That would result in considerably elevated violence in Ukraine to power a extra fast navy end result.

BERGEN: What is the Russian recreation plan now?

REPASS: Their preliminary concept of victory was to decapitate the Ukrainian authorities, safe a land bridge to Crimea after which seize as a lot land as potential. He additionally stated he was going to safe the Luhansk and Donetsk oblasts (areas). The extra land seizure was going to be issues that they have been prepared to discount away. They don’t have any intention of bargaining away the land bridge to Crimea.

Advertisement

The Russian expedition to Kyiv from the north was nicely anticipated and fantastically defended towards by the Ukrainians, and the Russians realized after substantial casualties that they did not want that. The seizure of Kyiv was (and is) not important to Russia’s success, and was a want-to-have versus a must have. The land bridge to Crimea is a Russian must-have.

In 2014, when the Russians invaded, they took over Crimea, however in addition they invaded within the east and created this mythology that there was an indigenous revolution in areas of the Donbas, the 2 “republics” of Luhansk and Donetsk, which Russia acknowledged as impartial republics within the runup to the warfare that they are presently in.

That space was closely industrialized and it has mineral wealth. A variety of the trade was destroyed through the warfare in 2014, however the coal stays, which Russia is desirous about controlling. Extending the political boundaries across the states of Luhansk and Donetsk and securing the land bridge to Crimea would give Putin ample political cowl to say some type of victory. It will permit him to then search a ceasefire or peace settlement. Nonetheless, I do not see the Ukrainians agreeing to any of this.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Minneapolis Promises Police Overhaul in Deal With Justice Department

Published

on

Minneapolis Promises Police Overhaul in Deal With Justice Department

The Minneapolis City Council unanimously voted on Monday to overhaul its police department to address a pattern of systemic abuses, as part of an agreement with the Department of Justice.

Lawyers from the Department of Justice and the city, where George Floyd was killed in 2020 by a police officer, have raced in recent weeks to finalize terms of the deal, known as a consent decree, before President-elect Donald J. Trump takes office. The previous Trump administration opposed the use of consent decrees, and the fate of nearly a dozen other federal investigations into American police departments is uncertain.

Under the deal approved on Monday, the Minneapolis department promised to closely track and investigate allegations of police misconduct, rein in the use of force, and improve officer training.

“This agreement reflects what our community has asked for and what we know is necessary: real accountability and meaningful change,” Mayor Jacob Frey of Minneapolis said in a statement.

Federal oversight, the strongest tool available to overhaul police departments with histories of abuse, begins with an exhaustive civil rights investigation and a report of findings. Cities then usually agree to negotiate a consent decree, a court-enforced oversight agreement, in order to avoid a federal lawsuit.

Advertisement

The Minneapolis decree was set in motion in the summer of 2023 after the Department of Justice issued a report accusing the city’s police department of routinely discriminating against Black and Native American residents, of needlessly using deadly force and of violating the First Amendment rights of protesters and journalists. The Minneapolis police union did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

City officials and lawyers from the Justice Department said they intended to present the deal to a federal judge, who will be responsible for overseeing its implementation.

During Mr. Trump’s first term in the White House, the Justice Department rejected such decrees, coming out in opposition to deals in Chicago and Baltimore and refraining from entering new ones. More recently, during a campaign rally last year, Mr. Trump said that in order to crack down on crime, the police should be allowed to be “extraordinarily rough,” and he spoke about the possibility of letting officers loose from constraints during “one really violent day.”

Officials in Minneapolis said they would remain committed to lasting change in the city’s police department, even if the Trump administration were to walk away from federal consent decrees. Several months before the Department of Justice report was issued, the city agreed to a policing overhaul as part of an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights.

Minneapolis set aside $27 million in its 2024 and 2025 budgets to pay for changes in response to the state and federal investigations. The city also paid $27 million to Mr. Floyd’s family in 2021 to settle their wrongful death lawsuit.

Advertisement

Consent decrees were pursued aggressively under President Barack Obama, whose administration entered into 15 of the decrees in a time of a growing public outcry over police abuses.

After Mr. Trump’s administration steered away from such decrees, the Justice Department under the Biden administration sought to bring them back, launching a dozen civil rights investigations into police departments.

But the Biden administration has been slow to bring those efforts to a resolution, in some cases letting years elapse. The Justice Department’s civil rights division has released a flurry of investigative findings in recent weeks, covering cities like Memphis, where the department found excessive force and racial discrimination; Mount Vernon, N.Y., where it found illegal arrests and strip searches; and Oklahoma City, where it found chronic mistreatment of people with behavioral disabilities by the police.

Some cities, like Memphis and Phoenix, which was the subject of an investigation after an extraordinarily high number of shootings by the police, have balked at entering into oversight agreements. The agreements usually call for changes in a number of aspects of a police department’s operations, training, policies and discipline, and can take a decade to complete.

The Biden administration is currently enforcing 15 consent decrees reached under previous administrations, but has completed only one other new one besides Minneapolis, in Louisville, Ky.

Advertisement

Those agreements and the department’s remaining investigations will be handed over to the Trump administration.

Devlin Barrett contributed reporting.

Continue Reading

News

Michael Barr to step down as Federal Reserve’s top Wall Street regulator

Published

on

Michael Barr to step down as Federal Reserve’s top Wall Street regulator

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Michael Barr is stepping down as Wall Street’s top regulator but will stay on as a governor at the Federal Reserve, the US central bank announced on Monday.

Barr will vacate his role as vice-chair for supervision at the end of February, cutting short a four-year term that began in July 2022. He will remain as a governor until that term is up in January 2032, meaning there will be no new vacancy on the seven-member board of governors.

Barr said in a statement that he was stepping down over concerns that a “risk of a dispute over the position could be a distraction” to the Fed’s goal to safeguard the US financial system.

Advertisement

“In the current environment, I’ve determined that I would be more effective in serving the American people from my role as governor,” he said.

His decision comes just ahead of Donald Trump’s return to the White House. The president-elect has vowed to slash regulations in his second term, and his advisers were reportedly considering demoting Barr, although the transition team had not asked him to resign.

Barr’s move averts a potentially messy battle between Trump and the central bank if the president-elect had sought to force him aside after retaking office. The board’s general counsel believed that Barr would have prevailed if the issue were raised in litigation. His private counsel noted that fighting such a case would have been disruptive for the institution.

“It’s not about the legal merits, it’s about practically what it would mean for the Fed in that period of time,” Barr said in an interview with the Financial Times. “It just made sense to me to get in front of all of that and take myself out of the equation.”

Since Barr is staying on as a Fed governor, Trump will have to select a new vice-chair for supervision from among the current group of governors. They include officials such as Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, both of who Trump selected for their jobs during his first term as president. Bowman, in particular, has emerged in recent years as a staunch opponent to many of the rule changes proposed by Barr — making her a potential choice for the job by the president-elect.

Advertisement

The Fed on Monday said it would not make any “major rulemakings” until a successor is confirmed by the Senate.

Since Barr assumed the top regulatory role in the US government and pledged to impose more stringent rules on major lenders, the Fed has faced intense legal pressure from banking lobby groups. Some of those groups filed a lawsuit in December against the central bank over its framework for stress tests, which aim to identify vulnerabilities at specific organisations in times of economic or financial strain.

The Fed was already considering what it described as “significant changes” to the stress tests in order to reduce volatility around the results and make the process more transparent. Changes could include amending models that calculate hypothetical losses for banks, averaging results over two years to lessen the risk of large year-on-year swings, and allowing the public to comment on hypothetical scenarios each year before they are finalised.

Last year, Barr was forced to revise his landmark proposal to raise capital requirements on lenders such as JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs. A bipartisan group of US lawmakers, chief executives at the biggest banks and lobbyists had launched a ferocious opposition campaign against the implementation of the so-called Basel III Endgame — the final rules tied to an international effort to shore up the sector in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.

In September, Barr unveiled proposals that would have roughly halved the increase in capital requirements to 9 per cent for the largest US banks, versus the 19 per cent initially floated.

Advertisement

Asked about the fate of the Basel rules, Barr said he was “hopeful that the process continues to move forward”.

Republicans cheered Barr’s decision to step down. Tim Scott, the head of the powerful Senate Committee on Banking, which oversees the Fed, said Barr had “failed to meet the responsibilities of his position”.

“I stand ready to work with President Trump to ensure we have responsible financial regulators at the helm,” Scott said in a statement.

Congressman French Hill from Arkansas, who chairs the House Financial Services Committee, said he was “pleased” to hear of Barr’s resignation.

“It’s my preference that his nominee is committed to tailoring bank regulatory policies and implementing a balanced approach to prudential supervision,” he added.

Advertisement

Ian Katz at Capital Alpha Partners said Barr’s resignation set the stage for “lighter touch” oversight from the Fed. Bowman was the “most obvious candidate for the job if she wants it”, he added.

Barr said in his resignation letter to President Joe Biden that it had been an “honour and a privilege to serve as the Federal Reserve board’s vice-chair for supervision, and to work with colleagues to help maintain the stability and strength of the US financial system so that it can meet the needs of American families and businesses”.

Continue Reading

News

‘America’s democracy stood’: Kamala Harris speaks after Congress certifies Trump win – video

Published

on

‘America’s democracy stood’: Kamala Harris speaks after Congress certifies Trump win – video

Kamala Harris said she was simply doing her constitutional duty in presiding over the certification of her presidential election defeat by Donald Trump on Monday. The certification was over quickly after no Democrats rose to object the results from any state – in contrast with four years ago when dozens of Republican lawmakers formally disputed Joe Biden’s victory in key swing states

Continue Reading

Trending