Connect with us

News

Renault’s Russia dilemma

Published

on

Renault’s Russia dilemma

Renault had for months been plotting to export a newfangled model of the Lada to the remainder of the world.

Though realising that ambition remained a way off, it might have capped the revival of a model arguably extra synonymous with the Soviet Union than every other and which Renault first took a punt on in 2007 after then chief Carlos Ghosn recognized Russia as a promising market.

Inspired by Russian president Vladimir Putin, Renault in 2012 lifted its stake in Avtovaz, the producer of the Lada for the reason that first one rolled off the manufacturing line in 1970, to a controlling one.

A decade on, its success in steering Lada by setbacks and market slumps has left Renault with a bigger enterprise in Russia than many different overseas firms, simply as Putin’s invasion of Ukraine dangers turning the nation right into a pariah state.

In distinction to some multinationals for whom the Russian market quantities to little greater than a rounding error of their accounts, Renault has an area workforce of 40,000 and generates 10 per cent of its revenues there.

Advertisement

The carmaker has not commented on its intentions, saying solely that it’s monitoring the state of affairs in Russia. The dimensions of Renault’s operations, alongside a scarcity of political strain in France to beat a retreat, has left the group minded to attempt to keep, in line with folks conversant in the matter.

However as the company stampede from Russia grows, the business and reputational dangers for the corporate, which counts the French authorities and Japan’s Nissan as its two greatest shareholders, are rising.

You’re seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. That is almost definitely as a consequence of being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Advertisement

“Persons are underestimating the potential financial collapse [in Russia], this might be an entire breakdown,” mentioned Mark McNamee, Europe director at FrontierView, a consultancy that advises firms on macroeconomics.

“There’s strain for firms to not be seen to be coping with Russia in any respect,” McNamee added, pointing to a very robust transfer amongst US client manufacturers to “self-sanction” and withdraw.

Renault has already been placed on discover of the mounting financial strains in Russia. Its three crops, together with one in Moscow that produces fashions below the Renault model, have confronted stoppages and struggled to supply elements as some suppliers reduce ties with the nation.

Avtovaz resumed manufacturing of some Lada fashions on Wednesday after a week-long pause at its huge Togliatti plant, which sits on the Volga river 1,000km east of Moscow. However all Avtovaz factories are set to be idled once more from April 4 for 20 days as Renault brings ahead a company trip usually scheduled for the summer season, whereas racing to stockpile digital components.

Advertisement

Semiconductors could be significantly laborious to supply inside Russia, trade consultants mentioned, even when Togliatti had its personal in depth steel stamping operations to make another elements.

Inside Russia there was “loads of strain on them to by no means cease once more”, one individual briefed on Renault’s operations mentioned. The danger of a Russian countermove to grab property was additionally a problem, they added.

Another automotive plant operators within the nation have obtained unannounced visits from native authorities to verify they’re nonetheless paying staff even when shut, in line with folks conversant in the visits.

Since Renault first invested in Avtovaz in 2007, its workforce has shrunk from over 100,000 because the French group has sought to modernise meeting strains. Virtually all staff are native aside from 10 foreigners in prime jobs or important positions, equivalent to Avtovaz head Nicolas Maure, and the group is reluctant to easily abandon its employees, folks at Renault have mentioned.

Visits from worldwide staff that usually perform high quality management checks have been cancelled, in line with Renault unions.

Advertisement

Though smaller than it was, the scale of Renault’s workforce means the stakes are excessive — each for the corporate and the Russian authorities. Its Togliatti plant, one of many world’s greatest automotive factories, is so giant that it used to function its personal hospital and stays a key supply of employment for within the surrounding Samara province.

Lengthy-running stoppages threat being very expensive. “The query is manufacturing and the way lengthy do you pay the employees till you may not afford it?” mentioned Philippe Houchois, an analyst at Jefferies.

A automotive model that resonates far past Russia, the Lada has lengthy been the best-selling one inside it, with its cheaper worth serving to to maintain its market share at round 20 per cent, at the same time as overseas rivals have pushed into the nation over the past 20 years.

You’re seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. That is almost definitely as a consequence of being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Advertisement

Even within the Soviet period, the no-frills Ladas have been one in all Russia’s most profitable exports. EU gross sales petered out over two years in the past when car emissions requirements tightened, although the model nonetheless bought new automobiles exterior Russia, together with in Kazakhstan and Belarus.

Nonetheless, below chief government Luca de Meo, Renault had been contemplating bringing a hybrid model of its Lada Niva again to western Europe by 2025, constructing on the revival of its sturdy off-road automotive first launched in 1977.

Though Renault’s crops have suffered from interruptions to manufacturing for the reason that invasion, there are indicators that demand is proving to be extra resilient — even because the Russian rouble has tumbled in worth.

“They’re shopping for up every part,” mentioned one automotive seller in Moscow, declaring that this was removed from enterprise as normal.

Advertisement

“For my part, they primarily wish to make investments cash, purchase something however make investments earlier than [the rouble] devalues fully,” he mentioned. “These with extra money purchase flats, those with much less cash purchase automobiles.”

Fears that spare elements for overseas automobiles would ultimately run out have been sharpening the Lada’s attraction, the seller added. Some folks have mentioned they preserve automobiles in underground parking or in garages relatively than within the streets due to issues they are going to be stolen for components.

“These are Russian merchandise made by Russians for Russia,” an official within the French authorities instructed the Monetary Occasions, including that it was too early to think about a radical halt to manufacturing or a departure. Japan’s Nissan, Renault’s alliance associate, declined to remark.

It’s a place the French authorities is sustaining regardless of Renault holding a 68 per cent Avtovaz stake alongside Rostec, a defence and industrial group run by a longtime Putin ally Sergei Chemezov, who has been below US-imposed sanctions since 2014.

French president Emmanuel Macron, who has held common talks with Putin for the reason that invasion and urged him to determine a ceasefire, has additionally pressured that the west was not at warfare with Russian folks.

Advertisement

His authorities has not pressured firms to depart, even in non-public exchanges, a number of folks conversant in the matter have mentioned. That features TotalEnergies, the French firm going through probably the most scrutiny over its continued Russian presence, after oil and fuel rivals BP and Shell introduced plans to go away.

© Dimitar Dilkoff/AFP/Getty

French firms are among the many greatest overseas employers in Russia, with 160,000 native employees in whole, in line with French officers. Meals producer Danone, grocery store group Auchan, DIY retailer Leroy Merlin and lender Société Générale even have giant operations.

“The query of whether or not these firms ought to depart [Russia] is definitely there,” mentioned Tatiana Kastouéva-Jean, the top of the Russia centre at French think-tank Ifri. “Some French firms have been resisting greater than others, however many are extra native and have extra to lose.”

Germany’s three main automotive producers, VW, Mercedes and BMW, suspended their gross sales or operations inside days of the invasion. The trio bought lower than 300,000 automobiles within the nation final 12 months, a fraction of the 13mn automobiles they delivered worldwide.

That’s lower than the full of Ladas turned out by the Renault group alone, whereas the corporate bought over 482,000 automobiles in Russia, together with below different manufacturers in 2021, a hefty 17 per cent chunk of its whole output.

Avtovaz has €3.1bn of property, in line with Renault accounts. Jefferies analyst Houchois mentioned Avtovaz actions have been largely ringfenced, limiting the fallout for the broader Renault group. “You might wipe out the worth to zero in your accounts and be capable to take care of that,” he added.

Advertisement

However, Renault’s shares have underperformed different French blue-chip firms for the reason that invasion, falling by greater than 20 per cent.

Its Russian dilemma dangers weighing on De Meo’s broader ambitions at Renault after the corporate, hit by company scandals after which the disruption from the coronavirus pandemic, solely edged again to revenue final 12 months after two years of losses.

“I’m anxious for the group,” mentioned a high-level individual at Renault, including that he thought the corporate ought to keep after spending years of funding and power in Russia.

Extra reporting by Domitille Alain in Paris, Joe Miller in Frankfurt and Eri Sugiura in Tokyo

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

RFK Jr. Would ‘Significantly Undermine’ Public Health, a Group of Experts Says

Published

on

RFK Jr. Would ‘Significantly Undermine’ Public Health, a Group of Experts Says

A new national coalition of health professionals and scientists, mobilizing to oppose Senate confirmation of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to be the United States’ next health secretary, released a public letter on Monday warning that his “unfounded, fringe beliefs could significantly undermine public health practices across the country and around the world.”

The coalition, calling itself “Defend Public Health,” includes faculty members from some of the U.S.’s leading academic institutions, including public health schools at Yale and Havard. Its leaders said they had gathered 700 signatures on the public letter and had generated 3,500 individual letters urging senators to reject Mr. Kennedy, President-elect Donald J. Trump’s choice to lead the Department of Health and Human Services.

“Mr. Kennedy is unqualified to lead the nation’s health department with a budget of over $1.6 trillion and over 80,000 employees,” the public letter states. “He has little to no relevant administrative, policy or health experience or expertise that would prepare him to oversee the work of critical public health agencies.”

Over the past several weeks, Mr. Kennedy has made the rounds on Capitol Hill, paying courtesy calls to senators who will consider his nomination. His confirmation is not assured, with some Republicans, including Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, chairman of the Senate Health Committee, having said that Mr. Kennedy’s vaccine skepticism gives them pause.

The letter published on Monday is only the latest public push by Kennedy opponents. A separate group, the Committee to Protect Health Care, said last week that it had gathered more than 15,000 signatures on a letter opposing Mr. Kennedy.

Advertisement

But Kennedy allies in the medical field are also mobilizing. In December, not long after Mr. Trump announced his nomination, a group of 800 medical professionals released its own letter supporting Mr. Kennedy. It said his nomination “represents an unparalleled chance to restore our nation’s health and renew trust in our public health institutions.”

Continue Reading

News

Trump risks turning the US into a rogue state

Published

on

Trump risks turning the US into a rogue state

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

“I think the president-elect is having a bit of fun”. That was how the Canadian ambassador to Washington reacted to Donald Trump’s first suggestion that her country should become the 51st American state.

The menacing “joke” is one of Trump’s preferred methods of communication. But the incoming president has now spoken at such length about his ambition to incorporate Canada into the US that Canadian politicians are having to take his ambitions seriously, and reject them in public.

The Canadians have the small solace that Trump ruled out invading their country and is instead threatening them with “economic force”. But he has refused to rule out military action to achieve his ambitions to “take back” the Panama Canal and take over Greenland, which is a self-governing Danish territory.

Advertisement

More light-hearted banter? The chancellor of Germany and foreign minister of France took Trump’s threats seriously enough to warn that Greenland is covered by the EU’s mutual defence clause. In other words — at least in theory — the EU and the US could end up at war over Greenland.

Trump’s defenders and sycophants are treating the whole thing as a huge joke. The New York Post proclaimed a new “Donroe Doctrine” — the 19th-century message to Europeans not to meddle in the western hemisphere — with Greenland relabelled as “our land”. Brandon Gill, a Republican congressman, smirked that the Canadians, Panamanians and Greenlanders should be “honoured” at the idea of becoming Americans.

But the rights of small nations are not a joke. The forcible or coerced takeover of a country by a larger neighbour is the biggest alarm bell in world politics. It is a signal that a rogue state is on the march. That is why the western alliance knew it was crucial to support Ukraine’s resistance to Russia. It is also why the US organised an international alliance to eject Iraq from Kuwait in the early nineties.

Attacks on small countries triggered the first and second world wars. When the British cabinet agonised in 1914 over whether go to war with Germany, David Lloyd George, who later became prime minister, wrote to his wife: “I have fought hard for peace . . . but I am driven to the conclusion that if the small nationality of Belgium is attacked by Germany all my traditions . . . will be engaged on the side of war.”

Britain and France infamously refused to protect Czechoslovakia from Nazi Germany in 1938. But within a year, they had recognised their error and extended a security guarantee to Poland — the next small neighbour on Germany’s hit list. The invasion of Poland triggered the start of conflict.

Advertisement

Trump’s supporters bitterly resent any comparison between his rhetoric and that of aggressors from the past or present. They argue that his demands are actually aimed at strengthening the free world, for a struggle against an autocratic China and possibly Russia too. Trump has justified his expansionist ambitions for Canada, Greenland and Panama on grounds of national security.

Another argument is that Trump’s bluster is simply a negotiating tactic. His supporters sometimes claim that he is just putting pressure on allied nations to do what is necessary, for the greater good of the western alliance. And after all, they say, aren’t many of Greenland’s 55,000 inhabitants seeking independence from Denmark? Are Canadians not tiring of the incompetent “woke” elite who run their country?

But these are feeble arguments. It would be legitimate for Trump to try to persuade Greenlanders that they might be better off as Americans. But threatening to use military or economic coercion is outrageous. His claims that many Canadians would love to join the US are also delusional. The idea was rejected by 82 per cent of Canadians in a recent poll.

As for grand strategy — the reality is that Trump’s threats to Greenland, Panama and Canada are an absolute gift to Russia and China. If Trump can claim that it is a strategic necessity for the US to take over Greenland or the Panama Canal, why is it illegitimate for Putin to claim that it is a strategic necessity for Russia to control Ukraine? If Gill can claim it is America’s “manifest destiny” to expand its frontiers, who could object when Xi Jinping insists it is China’s manifest destiny to control Taiwan?

Both Russia and China have long dreamt of pulling apart the western alliance. Trump is doing their work for them. Just a few weeks ago, it would have been beyond the Kremlin’s wildest dreams to see Canada’s main news magazine running a cover story on “Why America can’t conquer Canada”. The idea of European leaders invoking the EU’s mutual-defence clause against the US — not Russia — would also have seemed like fantasy. But these are the new realities.

Advertisement

Even if Trump never makes good on his threats, he has already done enormous damage to America’s global standing and to its alliance system. And he is not even in office yet.

It does seem unlikely Trump would order an invasion of Greenland. (Although it once seemed unlikely that he would attempt to overthrow an election.) It is even less probable that Canada will be intimidated into surrendering its independence. But the very fact that the incoming president is ripping up international norms is a disaster. Any sniggering at Trump’s “jokes” is misplaced. What we are witnessing is a tragedy — not a comedy.

gideon.rachman@ft.com

Continue Reading

News

Firefighters Brace For More Santa Ana Winds As Los Angeles Palisades and Eaton Fires Continue To Burn | Weather.com

Published

on

Firefighters Brace For More Santa Ana Winds As Los Angeles Palisades and Eaton Fires Continue To Burn | Weather.com
undefined

Play

  • At least 24 have been killed in wildfires throughout Los Angeles County.
  • Red flag warnings are issued for early this week, meaning dangerous fire conditions are expected.
  • The fires combined have burned more than 62 square miles.

T​he death toll is up to 24 as wildfires continue to burn in Los Angeles County. The Palisades Fire is being blamed for eight of those deaths, while the Eaton Fire is responsible for 16 fatalities. According to the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s office, missing persons reports have been filed for 16 individuals. The number of missing and the number perished could both rise, according to officials.

F​irefighters who spent the weekend keeping four large fires in check are now bracing for more Santa Ana winds which could stoke the flames and cause new fires to flare up.

The National Weather Service has posted red flag warnings through Wednesday, meaning severe fire conditions are expected. Gusts from 45 mph up to 70 mph are expected, with the worst of the weather coming on Tuesday morning through noon Wednesday.

(​MORE: Intense ‘Firenado’ Spawned By Palisades Fire)

Homes along the Pacific Coast Highway are seen burned by the Palisades Fire, Sunday, Jan. 12, 2025, in Malibu, California.

(AP Photo/Mark J. Terrill)

Seventy additional water trucks were sent to the county to help with any surging flames in the coming days, and fire retardant dropped from the air will block fires along hillsides, officials said.

“We are prepared for the upcoming wind event,” Los Angeles County Fire Chief Anthony C. Marrone said, according to the AP.

Advertisement

About 150,000 people in Los Angeles County are under evacuation orders. Officials said that evacuation orders in the Palisades area will likely stay in place until the red flag warnings expire Wednesday evening.

In total, the four blazes have consumed more than 62 square miles, an area larger than San Francisco, The Associated Press reported. T​he Palisades Fire, which has burned more than 37 square miles, according to CalFire, has consumed more than 1,000 structures. The fire was 13% contained early Monday morning. The Eaton Fire, at 27% containment early Monday, had consumed more than 22 square miles and more than 1,400 structures.

T​he Hurst Fire is now 89% contained after burning a little over one square mile.

More than 14,000 personnel, including firefighters from California, nine other states and Mexico, have been responding to the fires.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending