Connect with us

News

Renault’s Russia dilemma

Published

on

Renault’s Russia dilemma

Renault had for months been plotting to export a newfangled model of the Lada to the remainder of the world.

Though realising that ambition remained a way off, it might have capped the revival of a model arguably extra synonymous with the Soviet Union than every other and which Renault first took a punt on in 2007 after then chief Carlos Ghosn recognized Russia as a promising market.

Inspired by Russian president Vladimir Putin, Renault in 2012 lifted its stake in Avtovaz, the producer of the Lada for the reason that first one rolled off the manufacturing line in 1970, to a controlling one.

A decade on, its success in steering Lada by setbacks and market slumps has left Renault with a bigger enterprise in Russia than many different overseas firms, simply as Putin’s invasion of Ukraine dangers turning the nation right into a pariah state.

In distinction to some multinationals for whom the Russian market quantities to little greater than a rounding error of their accounts, Renault has an area workforce of 40,000 and generates 10 per cent of its revenues there.

Advertisement

The carmaker has not commented on its intentions, saying solely that it’s monitoring the state of affairs in Russia. The dimensions of Renault’s operations, alongside a scarcity of political strain in France to beat a retreat, has left the group minded to attempt to keep, in line with folks conversant in the matter.

However as the company stampede from Russia grows, the business and reputational dangers for the corporate, which counts the French authorities and Japan’s Nissan as its two greatest shareholders, are rising.

You’re seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. That is almost definitely as a consequence of being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Advertisement

“Persons are underestimating the potential financial collapse [in Russia], this might be an entire breakdown,” mentioned Mark McNamee, Europe director at FrontierView, a consultancy that advises firms on macroeconomics.

“There’s strain for firms to not be seen to be coping with Russia in any respect,” McNamee added, pointing to a very robust transfer amongst US client manufacturers to “self-sanction” and withdraw.

Renault has already been placed on discover of the mounting financial strains in Russia. Its three crops, together with one in Moscow that produces fashions below the Renault model, have confronted stoppages and struggled to supply elements as some suppliers reduce ties with the nation.

Avtovaz resumed manufacturing of some Lada fashions on Wednesday after a week-long pause at its huge Togliatti plant, which sits on the Volga river 1,000km east of Moscow. However all Avtovaz factories are set to be idled once more from April 4 for 20 days as Renault brings ahead a company trip usually scheduled for the summer season, whereas racing to stockpile digital components.

Advertisement

Semiconductors could be significantly laborious to supply inside Russia, trade consultants mentioned, even when Togliatti had its personal in depth steel stamping operations to make another elements.

Inside Russia there was “loads of strain on them to by no means cease once more”, one individual briefed on Renault’s operations mentioned. The danger of a Russian countermove to grab property was additionally a problem, they added.

Another automotive plant operators within the nation have obtained unannounced visits from native authorities to verify they’re nonetheless paying staff even when shut, in line with folks conversant in the visits.

Since Renault first invested in Avtovaz in 2007, its workforce has shrunk from over 100,000 because the French group has sought to modernise meeting strains. Virtually all staff are native aside from 10 foreigners in prime jobs or important positions, equivalent to Avtovaz head Nicolas Maure, and the group is reluctant to easily abandon its employees, folks at Renault have mentioned.

Visits from worldwide staff that usually perform high quality management checks have been cancelled, in line with Renault unions.

Advertisement

Though smaller than it was, the scale of Renault’s workforce means the stakes are excessive — each for the corporate and the Russian authorities. Its Togliatti plant, one of many world’s greatest automotive factories, is so giant that it used to function its personal hospital and stays a key supply of employment for within the surrounding Samara province.

Lengthy-running stoppages threat being very expensive. “The query is manufacturing and the way lengthy do you pay the employees till you may not afford it?” mentioned Philippe Houchois, an analyst at Jefferies.

A automotive model that resonates far past Russia, the Lada has lengthy been the best-selling one inside it, with its cheaper worth serving to to maintain its market share at round 20 per cent, at the same time as overseas rivals have pushed into the nation over the past 20 years.

You’re seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. That is almost definitely as a consequence of being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Advertisement

Even within the Soviet period, the no-frills Ladas have been one in all Russia’s most profitable exports. EU gross sales petered out over two years in the past when car emissions requirements tightened, although the model nonetheless bought new automobiles exterior Russia, together with in Kazakhstan and Belarus.

Nonetheless, below chief government Luca de Meo, Renault had been contemplating bringing a hybrid model of its Lada Niva again to western Europe by 2025, constructing on the revival of its sturdy off-road automotive first launched in 1977.

Though Renault’s crops have suffered from interruptions to manufacturing for the reason that invasion, there are indicators that demand is proving to be extra resilient — even because the Russian rouble has tumbled in worth.

“They’re shopping for up every part,” mentioned one automotive seller in Moscow, declaring that this was removed from enterprise as normal.

Advertisement

“For my part, they primarily wish to make investments cash, purchase something however make investments earlier than [the rouble] devalues fully,” he mentioned. “These with extra money purchase flats, those with much less cash purchase automobiles.”

Fears that spare elements for overseas automobiles would ultimately run out have been sharpening the Lada’s attraction, the seller added. Some folks have mentioned they preserve automobiles in underground parking or in garages relatively than within the streets due to issues they are going to be stolen for components.

“These are Russian merchandise made by Russians for Russia,” an official within the French authorities instructed the Monetary Occasions, including that it was too early to think about a radical halt to manufacturing or a departure. Japan’s Nissan, Renault’s alliance associate, declined to remark.

It’s a place the French authorities is sustaining regardless of Renault holding a 68 per cent Avtovaz stake alongside Rostec, a defence and industrial group run by a longtime Putin ally Sergei Chemezov, who has been below US-imposed sanctions since 2014.

French president Emmanuel Macron, who has held common talks with Putin for the reason that invasion and urged him to determine a ceasefire, has additionally pressured that the west was not at warfare with Russian folks.

Advertisement

His authorities has not pressured firms to depart, even in non-public exchanges, a number of folks conversant in the matter have mentioned. That features TotalEnergies, the French firm going through probably the most scrutiny over its continued Russian presence, after oil and fuel rivals BP and Shell introduced plans to go away.

© Dimitar Dilkoff/AFP/Getty

French firms are among the many greatest overseas employers in Russia, with 160,000 native employees in whole, in line with French officers. Meals producer Danone, grocery store group Auchan, DIY retailer Leroy Merlin and lender Société Générale even have giant operations.

“The query of whether or not these firms ought to depart [Russia] is definitely there,” mentioned Tatiana Kastouéva-Jean, the top of the Russia centre at French think-tank Ifri. “Some French firms have been resisting greater than others, however many are extra native and have extra to lose.”

Germany’s three main automotive producers, VW, Mercedes and BMW, suspended their gross sales or operations inside days of the invasion. The trio bought lower than 300,000 automobiles within the nation final 12 months, a fraction of the 13mn automobiles they delivered worldwide.

That’s lower than the full of Ladas turned out by the Renault group alone, whereas the corporate bought over 482,000 automobiles in Russia, together with below different manufacturers in 2021, a hefty 17 per cent chunk of its whole output.

Avtovaz has €3.1bn of property, in line with Renault accounts. Jefferies analyst Houchois mentioned Avtovaz actions have been largely ringfenced, limiting the fallout for the broader Renault group. “You might wipe out the worth to zero in your accounts and be capable to take care of that,” he added.

Advertisement

However, Renault’s shares have underperformed different French blue-chip firms for the reason that invasion, falling by greater than 20 per cent.

Its Russian dilemma dangers weighing on De Meo’s broader ambitions at Renault after the corporate, hit by company scandals after which the disruption from the coronavirus pandemic, solely edged again to revenue final 12 months after two years of losses.

“I’m anxious for the group,” mentioned a high-level individual at Renault, including that he thought the corporate ought to keep after spending years of funding and power in Russia.

Extra reporting by Domitille Alain in Paris, Joe Miller in Frankfurt and Eri Sugiura in Tokyo

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

US defence secretary Lloyd Austin withdraws plea deals for accused 9/11 plotters

Published

on

US defence secretary Lloyd Austin withdraws plea deals for accused 9/11 plotters

Unlock the US Election Countdown newsletter for free

US defence secretary Lloyd Austin has withdrawn plea deals reached earlier this week with the accused mastermind behind the September 11 2001 terror attacks and two accomplices, an extraordinary about-face in politically charged cases that have dragged on for years.

The brief memorandum published on Friday came just two days after the Pentagon announced Khaled Sheikh Mohammed, Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak Bin Attash and Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi had reached deals with the head of the military tribunal in Guntánamo Bay. The three men had been held at the US military base in Cuba for nearly two decades, where they faced the death penalty.

Austin also revoked the authority of retired Brigadier General Susan Escallier, who oversaw the Guantánamo war court, to enter into the agreements with the three prisoners, reserving such power for himself. Escallier was appointed to her post in 2023.

Advertisement

“I have determined that in light of the significance of the decision to enter into pre-trial agreements with the accused in the above-referenced case, responsibility for such a decision should rest with me as the superior convening authority under the Military Commissions Act of 2009,” Austin wrote in the memo addressed to Escallier.

“Effective immediately, I hereby withdraw your authority in the above-referenced case to enter into a pre-trial agreement and reserve such authority to myself. Effective immediately, in the exercise of my authority, I hereby withdraw from the three pre-trial agreements that you signed on July 31, 2024” in the cases in question, the memo stated.

The agreements reached on Wednesday had prompted a fierce backlash from Republicans, who accused the Biden administration of negotiating with individuals accused of taking part in a terror attack that killed nearly 3,000 people and dramatically altered US domestic and foreign policy.

The party’s Senate leader Mitch McConnell called the decision “a revolting abdication of the government’s responsibility”. It had also led to some criticism from the families of those who died on September 11, when attackers crashed planes into the World Trade Center in New York, the Pentagon, and a field in Pennsylvania.

A lawyer for Mohammed did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Advertisement

The exact terms of the three men’s original pleas were not disclosed by the US government, but they were expected to plead guilty and avoid a full trial. The proceedings had been mired in legal and ethical controversy over the length of the defendants’ custody without trial and instances of torture.

Mohammed, the alleged mastermind of the attacks, was captured in 2003 in Pakistan, and held at CIA prisons before being sent to Guantánamo Bay, where a military detention facility was opened during the administration of George W Bush to house prisoners captured during the US’s “war on terror” following the September 11 attacks. The agency has since been found to have subjected him to waterboarding, a form of torture, at least 183 times.

A report by a Senate select committee in 2014 found that “internal CIA records describe the waterboarding of [Khaled Sheikh Mohammed] as evolving into a ‘series of near drownings’”.

Harrowing accounts of such techniques sparked a fierce debate within the US over the legality of cases against Mohammed and other prisoners, and the ongoing litigation became a deeply divisive topic in Washington.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Defense secretary revokes plea deal with accused 9/11 plotters

Published

on

Defense secretary revokes plea deal with accused 9/11 plotters

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin nullified the plea deal with the defendants accused of plotting the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

Alex Wong/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Alex Wong/Getty Images

U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin revoked a plea agreement reached earlier this week with three accused plotters of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, including the alleged mastermind, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

The previous agreements exchanged guilty pleas from the men for sentences of, at most, life in prison.

Austin relieved the senior official in charge of military commissions, Brig. Gen. Susan Escallier, from her oversight of the case, saying in an order released Friday evening, “in light of the significance of the decision … responsibility for such a decision should rest with me.” The cancellation of the agreement effectively makes it a capital case again.

Advertisement

The previous plea agreements with the Pentagon, announced Wednesday, had been a partial resolution for a case that had dragged on for almost 20 years, and was unlikely ever to go to trial.

Reaction to the plea deals had been mixed; While some victim family members saw them as closure, many family members of the nearly 3,000 people who died in the Sept. 11, 2001, want the 9/11 defendants put to death.

Brett Eagleson, who was 15 when his father died in the World Trade Center collapse, sent NPR a statement issued by a group called 9/11 Justice that said it was “deeply troubled by these plea deals,” calling them the product of “closed-door agreements where crucial information is hidden without giving the families of the victims the chance to learn the full truth.”

Republican lawmakers expressed dismay at the agreements: among them, Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas, who introduced legislation intended to nullify it.

“Giving a plea deal to the terrorist masterminds behind 9/11 is disgraceful and an insult to the victims of the attack,” he said.

Advertisement

Austin’s decision throws the case back into limbo.

This is a developing story.

Continue Reading

News

The Court Filing

Published

on

The Court Filing

UNCLASSIFIED//FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
elements: severity and purpose.
“620
police brutality.”
619
These elements serve to distinguish true torture from “mere
The first inquiry is severity. The D.C. Circuit explained, “The critical issue is
“621
the degree of pain and suffering that the alleged torturer intended to, and actually did, inflict upon
the victim. The more intense, lasting, or heinous the agony, the more likely it is to be torture.”
The court gave “sustained systematic beating” and “tying up or hanging in positions that cause
extreme pain” as examples of “extreme, deliberate and unusually cruel practices” that meet the
severity requirement of torture. 622 It is permissible to infer the intent to cause pain from the facts
of the abuse. 623 Courts have characterized treatment milder than that at issue here as torture.
624
(note) [hereinafter TVPA]. TVPA, like § 2340, draws its definition from CAT. See Price, 294
F.3d at 92.
619
Price, 294 F.3d at 92; Warmbier v. Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, 356 F. Supp.
3d 30, 46 (D.D.C. 2018) (“To establish torture, the plaintiffs must show that the conduct was
sufficiently severe and purposeful.”).
620
Price, 294 F.3d at 93.
621 Id.
622 Id. at 92-93 (quoting S. Exec. Rep. No. 101-30, at 14 (1990)); see also Fritz v. Islamic
Republic of Iran, 320 F. Supp. 3d 48, 80 (D.D.C. 2018) (“And, on the other extreme, we know,
for example, that ‘sustained systematic beating… and tying up or hanging in positions that cause
extreme pain’ clearly cross the line.” (quoting Price, 294 F.3d at 93)).
623
Fritz, 320 F. Supp. 3d at 82.
624 See, e.g., Allan v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49541 (D.D.C. Mar. 25,
2019) (describing punches, kicks, sexually assaults, slaps, stress positions, refusal of access to food
and water, denial lavatories, mock executions, threats, and imprisonment in apartments, garages,
and basement prisons as torture).
Filed with TJ
15 May 2019
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Appellate Exhibit 628 (AAA)
Page 187 of 1205

Continue Reading

Trending