Connect with us

Health

How wildfire smoke affects the body: Doctors warn of health hazards

Published

on

How wildfire smoke affects the body: Doctors warn of health hazards

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

The Los Angeles wildfires have caused devastating losses of homes and lives — and survivors may also face hidden, although still potentially very dangerous, health effects.

Wildfire smoke contains a “complex mixture” of fine particles that can pose hazards after just short-term exposure, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Advertisement

Known as PM2.5, or particulate matter, these microscopic particles and droplets are 2.5 micrometers or less in diameter.

CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES: NAVY VETERAN AND MOTHER SHARES HEART-WRENCHING EVACUATION FROM HER HOME AND COMMUNITY

“Your nose and mouth are entry points into your body,” Dr. Gustavo Ferrer, a Florida pulmonologist with extensive experience in respiratory health and air quality-related illnesses, told Fox News Digital.

“The smoke you are breathing gets caught inside your sinuses, and if you’re exposed a lot, some of that will start to irritate the lining and lead to inflammation,” a doctor warned. (AP Photo/Noah Berger) (AP Newsroom)

“The smoke you are breathing gets caught inside your sinuses, and if you’re exposed a lot, some of that will start to irritate the lining and lead to inflammation,” he warned.

Advertisement

“These are signs that the pollution may be overwhelming the body’s natural defenses.”

Austin Perlmutter, MD, a board-certified internal medicine physician in Seattle, noted that exposure to wildfire smoke can penetrate through the lung tissue and enter the bloodstream.

Specific health effects

People exposed to air pollution can have a number of different symptoms, including burning eyes, sore throat, cough, sinus problems, fatigue, headaches, chest pain, shortness of breath and brain fog, according to Perlmutter.

Prolonged exposure to wildfire smoke can also aggravate existing conditions such as asthma, bronchitis and other chronic respiratory diseases, Ferrer noted.

CALIFORNIA FIRES AND MENTAL HEALTH TOLL: CELEBRITIES AND THERAPISTS OFFER TIPS

Advertisement

“The smoke can also worsen pre-existing respiratory conditions, like asthma or emphysema,” noted Dr. Marc Siegel, clinical professor of medicine at NYU Langone Health and Fox News senior medical analyst. 

“Also, not having enough oxygen can provoke a heart attack or stroke.”

People exposed to air pollution can have a number of different symptoms, including burning eyes, sore throat, cough, sinus problems, fatigue, headaches, chest pain, shortness of breath and brain fog. (AP Photo/Eric Thayer) (AP Newsroom)

Wildfire smoke has also been linked to an increased risk of a number of diseases, including heart and lung problems and brain dysfunction, Perlmutter added.

Certain groups are at a higher risk, he cautioned, including people with underlying heart and lung diseases or other existing chronic diseases, as well as infants, young children and older adults.

Advertisement

“The smoke can worsen pre-existing respiratory conditions, like asthma or emphysema.”

There are also mental health effects, according to Siegel.

A 10-year study in Nature Mental Health showed a “significant mental health impact” on Californians exposed to wildfires, the doctor pointed out.

“People may feel anxiety over being displaced or fear of losing their homes,” Siegel said. “This may lead to them being unable to sleep.”

There is also the increased danger of falls and other injuries from being in damaged areas where fire-related devastation occurred, he added.

Advertisement

6 tips to protect health amid wildfires

Experts shared the following steps people can take to help reduce the risk of wildfire health effects.

1. Practice nasal hygiene

Keeping your nasal passages open and clean is essential, Ferrer emphasized. 

“Washing daily, or up to two times a day or regularly, using a saline nasal spray can help clean the filter that’s inside your nose so it’s as effective as possible,” he told Fox News Digital.

During periods of high smoke levels, it’s best to limit time outdoors and keep windows and doors closed, experts agreed. (Richard Vogel)

People can use a pre-made saline solution or make their own at home with distilled water and salt, he said.

Advertisement

2. Stay indoors and optimize indoor air

During periods of high smoke levels, it’s best to limit time outdoors and keep windows and doors closed, according to Ferrer.

Using HEPA filters can also help to improve air quality, Shah noted. 

      

“Invest in air purifiers with HEPA filters to trap fine particulate matter (PM2.5) from wildfire smoke,” he suggested.

Shah also recommends using weather stripping where needed and changing HVAC filters at a higher frequency.

Advertisement

During the first few months of cleanup, excess chemicals and particulates that are released can significantly worsen air quality. (iStock)

People may also want to minimize “indoor air pollution,” Perlmutter added.

“Don’t light candles, fires or incense and don’t smoke indoors,” he advised. “If you cook, ventilate using a hood if you have one.”

3. Consider leaving the area temporarily

During the first few months of cleanup, excess chemicals and particulates that are released can significantly worsen air quality, warned Dr. Darshan Shah, MD, a board-certified surgeon and founder and CEO of Next Health in California.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

Advertisement

“Consider relocating temporarily to a safer area until conditions improve,” he recommended.

4. Wear a mask

When venturing outside, experts recommend wearing a well-fitting N95 respirator mask to filter out smoke particles. 

When venturing outside, experts recommend wearing a well-fitting N95 respirator mask to filter out smoke particles.  (AP Newsroom)

“Cloth masks, dust masks and other lower quality masks likely won’t provide much protection,” Perlmutter said.

5. Monitor air quality

Experts recommend regularly checking the AQI (Air Quality Index).

Advertisement

“Use apps or websites (like AirNow) to monitor air quality and avoid outdoor activities when AQI is unhealthy,” Shah said.

For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health

6. Do not tour burned areas

“Avoid visiting recently burned areas, as they pose a high risk of exposure to harmful chemicals and smoldering smoke, which can severely impact respiratory and overall health,” Shah advised.

Health

GLP-1s Don’t Work for Everyone: What To Know if You’re Not Seeing Results

Published

on

GLP-1s Don’t Work for Everyone: What To Know if You’re Not Seeing Results


Advertisement





GLP-1 Not Working? Here’s Why and Alternatives That Can Help




















Advertisement





Advertisement


Use left and right arrow keys to navigate between menu items.


Use escape to exit the menu.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Health

Common eating habit may trigger premature immune system aging, study finds

Published

on

Common eating habit may trigger premature immune system aging, study finds

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Eating too much salt has long been linked to high blood pressure, but new research suggests it could trick the immune system into prematurely aging the blood vessels.

A preclinical study recently published in the Journal of the American Heart Association has identified a biological chain reaction that links a salty diet to cardiovascular decay.

Scientists at the University of South Alabama observed that mice on a high-salt diet experienced rapid deterioration in their blood vessel function.

HIGH SALT INTAKE LINKED TO FASTER MEMORY DECLINE IN ONE GROUP, STUDY FINDS

Advertisement

After just four weeks of high sodium intake, the small arteries responsible for regulating blood flow lost their ability to relax, according to a press release.

The team found that the cells lining these vessels had entered a state of cellular senescence, a form of premature cellular aging in which cells stop dividing and release a mix of inflammatory signals that can damage surrounding tissue.

Excess salt has long been linked to high blood pressure, but a new study goes deeper into its effects on the cardiovascular system. (iStock)

The researchers tried to replicate this damage by exposing blood vessel cells directly to salt in a laboratory dish, but the cells showed no harmful effects.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES

Advertisement

This suggests that salt isn’t directly causing damage to the vascular lining but that the real culprit may be the body’s own defense mechanism, the researchers noted.

Excess salt may trigger the immune system to release a molecule called interleukin-16 (IL-16), which acts as a messenger that instructs blood vessel cells to grow old before their time, according to the study.

Excess salt may trigger the immune system to release a molecule called interleukin-16, which acts as a messenger that instructs blood vessel cells to grow old before their time, according to the study. (iStock)

Once these cells age, they fail to produce nitric oxide, the essential gas that tells arteries to dilate and stay flexible.

To test whether this process could be reversed, the team turned to a class of experimental drugs known as senolytics.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Using a cancer medication called navitoclax, which selectively clears out aged and dysfunctional cells, the researchers were able to restore nearly normal blood vessel function in the salt-fed mice, the release stated.

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ.

By removing the decaying cells created by the high-salt diet, the drug allowed the remaining healthy tissue to maintain its elasticity and respond correctly to blood flow demands.

Excess salt may trigger the immune system into stopping the cells from dividing, the study suggests. (iStock)

Advertisement

The study did have some limitations. The transition from mouse models to human treatment remains a significant hurdle, the team cautioned.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

Senolytic drugs like navitoclax are still being studied for safety, and the team emphasized that previous trials have shown mixed results regarding their impact on artery plaque.

Additionally, the researchers have not yet confirmed whether the same IL-16 pathway is the primary driver of vascular aging in humans.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Health

Healthy diets spark lung cancer risk in non-smokers as pesticides loom

Published

on

Healthy diets spark lung cancer risk in non-smokers as pesticides loom

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Eating a diet high in fruits and vegetables was found to have a surprising link to lung cancer among younger non-smokers, early research suggests.

The observational study, led by Jorge Nieva, M.D., of the USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center at Keck Medicine, was presented this month at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) annual meeting in San Diego. It has not yet been peer-reviewed. 

Researchers looked at dietary, smoking and demographic data for 187 patients who were diagnosed with lung cancer at age 50 or younger. 

PANCREATIC CANCER PATIENT SURVIVAL DOUBLED WITH HIGH DOSE OF COMMON VITAMIN, STUDY FINDS

Advertisement

They found that among non-smokers, there was a link between healthier-than-average diets – rich in fruits, vegetables and whole grains – and the chance of lung cancer development.

Young lung cancer patients ate more servings of dark green vegetables, legumes and whole grains compared to the average U.S. adult, the researchers found.

Eating a diet high in fruits and vegetables was found to have a surprising link to lung cancer among younger non-smokers, early research suggests. (iStock)

The researchers hypothesized that pesticides applied to conventionally grown produce could be a possible factor in the disease association.

“Commercially produced (non-organic) fruits, vegetables and whole grains are more likely to be associated with a higher residue of pesticides than dairy, meat and many processed foods,” according to Nieva. He also noted that agricultural workers exposed to pesticides tend to have higher rates of lung cancer.

Advertisement

HIDDEN VIRUS INSIDE GUT BACTERIA LINKED TO DOUBLED COLORECTAL CANCER RISK, STUDY FINDS

“There is a large subset of lung cancer patients whose disease is not caused by smoking,” Nieva told Fox News Digital.

The disease is becoming more common in non-smokers 50 and younger, especially women – despite the fact that smoking rates have been falling for decades, the researcher noted.

The researchers hypothesized that pesticides applied to conventionally grown produce could be a possible factor in the disease association. (iStock)

“These patients tend to have eaten much healthier diets before their diagnosis than the average American,” he went on. “We need to support research into understanding why Americans – and women in particular – who no longer smoke very much are still having lung cancer,” he said.

Advertisement

DEATHS FROM ONE TYPE OF CANCER ARE SURGING AMONG YOUNGER ADULTS WITHOUT COLLEGE DEGREES

The study did have some limitations, Nieva acknowledged, primarily that it relied on survey data and was limited by the participants’ memories of their food intake.  

“Also, the survey participants were self-selected, and this could have biased the findings,” he told Fox News Digital.

“There is a large subset of lung cancer patients whose disease is not caused by smoking.”

The researchers did not test specific foods for pesticides, relying instead on average pesticide levels for certain types of food. Looking ahead, they plan to test patients’ blood and urine samples to directly measure pesticide levels, Nieva said.

Advertisement

Although the study shows only an association and does not prove that pesticides caused lung cancer, Nieva recommends that people wash their produce before eating and choose organic foods whenever possible.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES

“This work represents a critical step toward identifying modifiable environmental factors that may contribute to lung cancer in young adults,” said Nieva. “Our hope is that these insights can guide both public health recommendations and future investigation into lung cancer prevention.”  

“It is possible that the increased lung cancer risk could be due to pesticide exposure in whole farmed foods, but is by no means certain,” a doctor said. (AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall)

Dr. Marc Siegel, Fox News senior medical analyst, said the study is “interesting,” but that it “raises far more questions than it answers.”

Advertisement

“It is a small study (around 150) and observational, so no proof,” the doctor, who was not involved in the research, told Fox News Digital.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

“It is possible that the increased lung cancer risk could be due to pesticide exposure in whole farmed foods, but it is by no means certain,” Siegel went on. “How much exposure is needed? How much of it gets into food and in which areas? This requires much further study.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Kayla Nichols, communications director for Pesticide Action & Agroecology Network, a distributed global network, said the organization agrees with the study’s conclusion that more research should be done on the rise in lung cancer, particularly in individuals eating diets higher in produce and fiber.

Advertisement

“There is a large subset of lung cancer patients whose disease is not caused by smoking,” the researcher told Fox News Digital. (iStock)

“There is a bounty of existing research that already links pesticide exposure to increased risk of multiple types of cancers,” Nichols, who was also not involved in the study, told Fox News Digital. She called for more research on chronic, low-level exposures to pesticides, as well as more effective policies to protect the public from pesticide residues on food.

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

The study was supported by the National Institutes of Health and the National Cancer Institute, as well as industry partners including AstraZeneca and Genentech, among others.

Fox News Digital reached out to several pesticide companies and trade groups for comment.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending