Connect with us

News

Opinion: Many Filipinos might not recall the frightening rule of Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos — but I do

Published

on

Opinion: Many Filipinos might not recall the frightening rule of Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos — but I do

Even when most Filipinos alive right this moment do not bear in mind what these days had been like — half of the nation’s inhabitants was below 8 years previous when the Marcos dad and mom had been ousted — I actually do. They had been days of wine and roses and an all however unprecedented kleptocracy — lots of Imelda’s notorious assortment of three,000 sneakers, reportedly now sit in a Manila museum.

Tales of the Marcos household extravagance and corruption are legendary, and as a former reporter within the area I’ve my fair proportion. In October 1976, the IMF/World Financial institution held its annual assembly in Manila. To organize, the Marcos’s engineered an all however unprecedented constructing growth — 14 new international-class motels in exactly as many months. At a ribbon-cutting ceremony for the 700-room Plaza Resort, 2,000 company had been handled to tables groaning below hors d’oeuvres.

Pals and kinfolk of the household had been in on possession of those motels, most constructed with authorities capital that was not going to the priorities of the Philippines’ most desperately impoverished.

In the meantime the Philippines had been awarded a World Financial institution grant to rebuild elements of Manila’s close by Tondo slum, one of many worst in Asia. These funds had disappeared — and Robert McNamara, former US Protection Secretary and then-head of the World Financial institution was coming to city.

Imelda, governor of metro Manila, merely ordered the slum demolished and paved over, with 60 households carted to some vacant land 20 miles exterior the capital, the place they’d been dumped in a big discipline.

Advertisement
I found the malevolent scheme. McNamara was livid, Imelda by no means forgave me. The day my story ran, I used to be despatched off to cowl a coup in Thailand, whereas hundreds of Filipino households remained in limbo — some in different elements of Tondo, others distant in Manila’s outskirts. Right now, Tondo stays one of the crucial impoverished slums in Asia. And younger Marcos has mentioned little throughout his marketing campaign that implies he’ll do a lot to alter this, simply one among so many poisonous penalties of his dad and mom’ rule.

Via all of it, Bongbong had a pampered and gilded upbringing. Imelda — now 92 — nonetheless helps her son’s ambitions unswervingly, although these days quietly. Dindo Manhit, CEO of the Stratbase ADR Institute, a number one political suppose tank within the Philippines, instructed me that Imelda has “disappeared from public.”

Many individuals nonetheless consider the Marcos household cared for the frequent folks. Bongbong is enjoying on this, loudly. And there are some specialists who consider Imelda sees Bongbong placing an finish to the persevering with seek for the huge funds that they had purloined and the jail time that might nonetheless await her.

How is one other Marcos even potential on this democracy that Filipinos have struggled to take care of, even again 40 years in the past after I first started reporting on its politics as South East Asia bureau chief for the New York Occasions. The nation was shaped in 1946 after independence from the US which had freed it from brutal Japanese rule through the Second World Conflict.

This time, no less than, Bongbong and his crew appear to be taking some pages straight out of Donald Trump’s MAGA playbook. “It is the rise of social media,” Manhit instructed me throughout our phone dialog from Manila. “Within the Philippines the second supply of data — after tv, greater than any broadsheet newspaper, greater than radio — is Fb and YouTube,” he mentioned.

“It is one-way propaganda,” Manhit added, and each time any media tries to color Bongbong’s feedback as outlandish, his supporters merely label this “faux information.” Sound acquainted?

That the venal and violent years of Bongbong’s dad and mom reign had been something however halcyon instances crammed with prosperity and regulation and order is just shouted down as false.

A Marcos supporter holds pictures of the late dictator Ferdinand and his wife Imelda, as Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. holds a campaign rally, in February this year.
Now, the following era of the Marcos clan harps on vaguely, as Bongbong put it in an interview with CNN Philippines, about plans for reaching unity — “costs and jobs. Jobs, jobs, jobs. Costs, costs, costs.”

Bongbong has tried to make sure that his household — which below dad and mom Ferdinand and Imelda held sway for 21 brutal and corrupt years from 1965 by way of 1986 — will now return to energy by tying himself carefully to the nonetheless much-admired Duterte, tapping the president’s daughter Sarah as his vice presidential working mate.

And younger Marcos has been doing his stage greatest to rehabilitate the reminiscence of his dad and mom, describing his father as a “genius” in a CNN Philippines interview. This, regardless of the fact below martial regulation, imposed by Ferdinand Marcos in 1972, when tens of hundreds of individuals had been arrested and detained, and hundreds of others tortured, forcibly disappeared and killed, in accordance with Amnesty Worldwide.
Overseas, Marcos is seen as tilting towards China — his first go to after coming into the race final fall was to its embassy. China continues to flex its muscle tissue within the close by South China Sea. Public opinion, which leans closely towards the US and Australia, might act as a restraint, and certainly in a few of his newest remarks, Bongbong appears to have tempered his public feedback.

Some crucial questions stay. How a lot of this tilt away from China is for present? However above all, would the Biden administration tolerate the identical stage of Marcos-like abuses or excesses as a succession of American presidents did through the 20 years his dad and mom had been in energy and that stretched by way of the Vietnam Conflict period?

Advertisement

This allowed the US to take care of a serious air base at Clark Subject within the Philippines, the place I lined the arrival of hundreds of evacuees within the ultimate days of the Vietnam Conflict in 1975, and a naval facility at Subic Bay. American oversight of each services ended after the top of Marcos rule.

Right now, the US has hitched its Asian strategic priorities to Australia, with billions of {dollars} in protection agreements. However a sympathetic Philippines authorities might be a Most worthy asset within the area — offered the prices usually are not too excessive for both America or the Philippines folks.
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Minneapolis Promises Police Overhaul in Deal With Justice Department

Published

on

Minneapolis Promises Police Overhaul in Deal With Justice Department

The Minneapolis City Council unanimously voted on Monday to overhaul its police department to address a pattern of systemic abuses, as part of an agreement with the Department of Justice.

Lawyers from the Department of Justice and the city, where George Floyd was killed in 2020 by a police officer, have raced in recent weeks to finalize terms of the deal, known as a consent decree, before President-elect Donald J. Trump takes office. The previous Trump administration opposed the use of consent decrees, and the fate of nearly a dozen other federal investigations into American police departments is uncertain.

Under the deal approved on Monday, the Minneapolis department promised to closely track and investigate allegations of police misconduct, rein in the use of force, and improve officer training.

“This agreement reflects what our community has asked for and what we know is necessary: real accountability and meaningful change,” Mayor Jacob Frey of Minneapolis said in a statement.

Federal oversight, the strongest tool available to overhaul police departments with histories of abuse, begins with an exhaustive civil rights investigation and a report of findings. Cities then usually agree to negotiate a consent decree, a court-enforced oversight agreement, in order to avoid a federal lawsuit.

Advertisement

The Minneapolis decree was set in motion in the summer of 2023 after the Department of Justice issued a report accusing the city’s police department of routinely discriminating against Black and Native American residents, of needlessly using deadly force and of violating the First Amendment rights of protesters and journalists. The Minneapolis police union did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

City officials and lawyers from the Justice Department said they intended to present the deal to a federal judge, who will be responsible for overseeing its implementation.

During Mr. Trump’s first term in the White House, the Justice Department rejected such decrees, coming out in opposition to deals in Chicago and Baltimore and refraining from entering new ones. More recently, during a campaign rally last year, Mr. Trump said that in order to crack down on crime, the police should be allowed to be “extraordinarily rough,” and he spoke about the possibility of letting officers loose from constraints during “one really violent day.”

Officials in Minneapolis said they would remain committed to lasting change in the city’s police department, even if the Trump administration were to walk away from federal consent decrees. Several months before the Department of Justice report was issued, the city agreed to a policing overhaul as part of an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights.

Minneapolis set aside $27 million in its 2024 and 2025 budgets to pay for changes in response to the state and federal investigations. The city also paid $27 million to Mr. Floyd’s family in 2021 to settle their wrongful death lawsuit.

Advertisement

Consent decrees were pursued aggressively under President Barack Obama, whose administration entered into 15 of the decrees in a time of a growing public outcry over police abuses.

After Mr. Trump’s administration steered away from such decrees, the Justice Department under the Biden administration sought to bring them back, launching a dozen civil rights investigations into police departments.

But the Biden administration has been slow to bring those efforts to a resolution, in some cases letting years elapse. The Justice Department’s civil rights division has released a flurry of investigative findings in recent weeks, covering cities like Memphis, where the department found excessive force and racial discrimination; Mount Vernon, N.Y., where it found illegal arrests and strip searches; and Oklahoma City, where it found chronic mistreatment of people with behavioral disabilities by the police.

Some cities, like Memphis and Phoenix, which was the subject of an investigation after an extraordinarily high number of shootings by the police, have balked at entering into oversight agreements. The agreements usually call for changes in a number of aspects of a police department’s operations, training, policies and discipline, and can take a decade to complete.

The Biden administration is currently enforcing 15 consent decrees reached under previous administrations, but has completed only one other new one besides Minneapolis, in Louisville, Ky.

Advertisement

Those agreements and the department’s remaining investigations will be handed over to the Trump administration.

Devlin Barrett contributed reporting.

Continue Reading

News

Michael Barr to step down as Federal Reserve’s top Wall Street regulator

Published

on

Michael Barr to step down as Federal Reserve’s top Wall Street regulator

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Michael Barr is stepping down as Wall Street’s top regulator but will stay on as a governor at the Federal Reserve, the US central bank announced on Monday.

Barr will vacate his role as vice-chair for supervision at the end of February, cutting short a four-year term that began in July 2022. He will remain as a governor until that term is up in January 2032, meaning there will be no new vacancy on the seven-member board of governors.

Barr said in a statement that he was stepping down over concerns that a “risk of a dispute over the position could be a distraction” to the Fed’s goal to safeguard the US financial system.

Advertisement

“In the current environment, I’ve determined that I would be more effective in serving the American people from my role as governor,” he said.

His decision comes just ahead of Donald Trump’s return to the White House. The president-elect has vowed to slash regulations in his second term, and his advisers were reportedly considering demoting Barr, although the transition team had not asked him to resign.

Barr’s move averts a potentially messy battle between Trump and the central bank if the president-elect had sought to force him aside after retaking office. The board’s general counsel believed that Barr would have prevailed if the issue were raised in litigation. His private counsel noted that fighting such a case would have been disruptive for the institution.

“It’s not about the legal merits, it’s about practically what it would mean for the Fed in that period of time,” Barr said in an interview with the Financial Times. “It just made sense to me to get in front of all of that and take myself out of the equation.”

Since Barr is staying on as a Fed governor, Trump will have to select a new vice-chair for supervision from among the current group of governors. They include officials such as Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, both of who Trump selected for their jobs during his first term as president. Bowman, in particular, has emerged in recent years as a staunch opponent to many of the rule changes proposed by Barr — making her a potential choice for the job by the president-elect.

Advertisement

The Fed on Monday said it would not make any “major rulemakings” until a successor is confirmed by the Senate.

Since Barr assumed the top regulatory role in the US government and pledged to impose more stringent rules on major lenders, the Fed has faced intense legal pressure from banking lobby groups. Some of those groups filed a lawsuit in December against the central bank over its framework for stress tests, which aim to identify vulnerabilities at specific organisations in times of economic or financial strain.

The Fed was already considering what it described as “significant changes” to the stress tests in order to reduce volatility around the results and make the process more transparent. Changes could include amending models that calculate hypothetical losses for banks, averaging results over two years to lessen the risk of large year-on-year swings, and allowing the public to comment on hypothetical scenarios each year before they are finalised.

Last year, Barr was forced to revise his landmark proposal to raise capital requirements on lenders such as JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs. A bipartisan group of US lawmakers, chief executives at the biggest banks and lobbyists had launched a ferocious opposition campaign against the implementation of the so-called Basel III Endgame — the final rules tied to an international effort to shore up the sector in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.

In September, Barr unveiled proposals that would have roughly halved the increase in capital requirements to 9 per cent for the largest US banks, versus the 19 per cent initially floated.

Advertisement

Asked about the fate of the Basel rules, Barr said he was “hopeful that the process continues to move forward”.

Republicans cheered Barr’s decision to step down. Tim Scott, the head of the powerful Senate Committee on Banking, which oversees the Fed, said Barr had “failed to meet the responsibilities of his position”.

“I stand ready to work with President Trump to ensure we have responsible financial regulators at the helm,” Scott said in a statement.

Congressman French Hill from Arkansas, who chairs the House Financial Services Committee, said he was “pleased” to hear of Barr’s resignation.

“It’s my preference that his nominee is committed to tailoring bank regulatory policies and implementing a balanced approach to prudential supervision,” he added.

Advertisement

Ian Katz at Capital Alpha Partners said Barr’s resignation set the stage for “lighter touch” oversight from the Fed. Bowman was the “most obvious candidate for the job if she wants it”, he added.

Barr said in his resignation letter to President Joe Biden that it had been an “honour and a privilege to serve as the Federal Reserve board’s vice-chair for supervision, and to work with colleagues to help maintain the stability and strength of the US financial system so that it can meet the needs of American families and businesses”.

Continue Reading

News

‘America’s democracy stood’: Kamala Harris speaks after Congress certifies Trump win – video

Published

on

‘America’s democracy stood’: Kamala Harris speaks after Congress certifies Trump win – video

Kamala Harris said she was simply doing her constitutional duty in presiding over the certification of her presidential election defeat by Donald Trump on Monday. The certification was over quickly after no Democrats rose to object the results from any state – in contrast with four years ago when dozens of Republican lawmakers formally disputed Joe Biden’s victory in key swing states

Continue Reading

Trending