Connect with us

Lifestyle

4 takeaways from Erin Patterson's testimony at her toxic mushroom triple murder trial

Published

on

4 takeaways from Erin Patterson's testimony at her toxic mushroom triple murder trial

Erin Patterson, pictured at her home in Leongatha, Victoria, Australia, in August 2023. Three people died of death cap poisoning after eating a meal she had cooked the previous month.

Jason Edwards/Newspix via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Jason Edwards/Newspix via Getty Images

The Australian woman accused of killing her estranged husband’s elderly relatives with toxic mushrooms in a home-cooked meal is sharing her story — and dropping bombshells — during multiple days of testimony in court.

Erin Patterson, 50, is accused of intentionally putting death cap mushrooms — which are among the most poisonous in the world — in a beef Wellington dish she served at a July 2023 lunch at her home in the small town of Leongatha, some 85 miles from Melbourne.

All four of her guests — her husband’s parents, aunt and uncle — were hospitalized with gastrointestinal symptoms the following day, and three of them died the following week from altered liver function and multiple organ failure due to Amanita mushroom poisoning.

Advertisement

Patterson was briefly hospitalized but did not have the same symptoms as her guests. She testified that she vomited later that day after eating two-thirds of a cake they had brought.

Patterson, a mother of two, denies that the poisoning was deliberate and has pleaded not guilty to three counts of murder and one count of attempted murder. She faces life imprisonment if convicted.

As Patterson’s triple murder trial in the Victoria state Supreme Court unfolds, she has admitted to lying about certain details of her story — such as the cancer diagnosis she invited her guests over to tell them about, her previously undisclosed mushroom foraging hobby and the fact that she had owned a food dehydrator but quickly disposed of it during the investigation.

“Even after you were discharged from hospital you did not tell a single person that there may have been foraged mushroom used in the meal,” prosecutor Nanette Rogers asked her Friday. “Instead you got up, you drove your children to school … and drove home. And then you got rid of the dehydrator.”

“Correct,” Patterson replied.

Advertisement

The trial, which began in April, was initially expected to take around six weeks. Justice Christopher Beale said Thursday there are several more steps in the proceedings, potentially including hearing new evidence, before the jury is sequestered for deliberations.

“And then the boot is on the other foot, because none of you can tell me how long you will be in deliberations,” Beale said. “How long is a piece of string? You will take all the time you need.”

Here are some of the biggest takeaways from Patterson’s week on the stand.

1. Patterson complained about her in-laws behind their backs

Erin and Simon Patterson got married in 2007 and, after splitting and reconciling multiple times over the years, separated permanently in 2015. They remained amicable and in close contact, sharing custody of their two children, seeing each other in church and even going on vacations together.

Simon was invited to the fateful lunch but declined the invitation the night before.

Advertisement

Patterson was also on good terms with her in-laws, Gail and Donald Patterson, both 70, saying in court that “they treated me like their own daughter.”

But prosecutors — and Patterson herself — acknowledged that her relationship with Simon started deteriorating in 2022. Patterson said after noticing that he described himself as single on his tax return, she asked him to start paying child support, which he did. But they continued to fight over related issues, including which school their kids should attend and who should pay the fees.

On Thursday, Rogers asked Patterson to read from Signal messages she had sent to Donald and Gail about the disputed school fees. Patterson denied that she was asking her in-laws to make Simon pay for them.

“What I wanted from them, whether I communicated it well or not, was I wanted Don and Gail to help Simon and I communicate better about it,” Patterson said. “I thought that … if Simon knew that Don and Gail knew how he was behaving, he might change his behaviour.”

But Don and Gail took Simon’s side, which prosecutors allege made Patterson angry.

Advertisement

On Friday, the prosecution asked Patterson about Facebook messages she sent to friends in late 2022 complaining about Simon’s parents, including: “Don messaged to say he and Gail don’t want to get involved in the financial things but just hope we will pray for the kids,” alongside what she disputes was an eye-rolling emoji. Elsewhere, she wrote, “‘This family I swear to f****** god.”

“‘I thought his parents would want him to do the right thing but it seems their concern about not wanting to feel uncomfortable and not wanting to get involved in their sons personal matters are overriding that so f*** em,” read another message.

Under questioning, Patterson denied that the messages reflected her true feelings about Don and Gail, and said she was simply “venting.” But Rogers accused her of having “two faces: a public face of appearing to have a good relationship with Don and Gail” and a private face reflected in her Facebook messages.

“Are you asking me to agree if I had two faces?” Patterson replied, before answering, “I had a good relationship with Don and Gail.”

Flowers rest on the grave site for Don and Gail Patterson.

Flowers rest on the grave site for Don and Gail Patterson at the Korumburra General Cemetery during their daughter-in-law’s trial in May 2025.

Asanka Ratnayake/Getty Images

Advertisement


hide caption

toggle caption

Asanka Ratnayake/Getty Images

Advertisement

2. Patterson denies telling her guests she had cancer

Prosecutors say Patterson invited Don and Gail Patterson, as well as Gail’s sister Heather Wilkinson, 66, and her husband Ian Wilkinson, 68, over for lunch to discuss some medical issues she was facing and how to break the news to her kids (whom she dropped off for lunch and a movie with a friend before her guests arrived).

Based on accounts from Ian Wilkinson, the sole survivor, Patterson told the group at lunch that she had been diagnosed with cancer after noticing a bump on her elbow, and asked for advice on whether to tell her kids.

In court on Thursday, Patterson acknowledged that she had misled Gail about the lump on her elbow in the weeks before the lunch, and didn’t have medical issues to communicate either to her guests or her kids.

“I didn’t have a legitimate medical reason, no, that’s true,” Patterson said.

When asked directly, Patterson repeatedly denied telling her lunch guests that she had cancer — contradicting Wilkinson’s version of events. But she admitted that at the end of the lunch, “I’m not proud of this, but I led them to believe that I might be needing some treatment,” following up on a previous ovarian cancer scare.

Advertisement

“I can’t remember the precise words, but I do know what I was trying to communicate was that I was undergoing investigations around ovarian cancer and might need treatment in that regard in the future,” she said. “I can’t say that that was the specific words I used, but that’s what I remember wanting to communicate.”

Patterson said she had long struggled with low self-esteem because of her weight and had made an appointment for that September to look into gastric bypass surgery.

“I was really embarrassed about it, so I thought perhaps letting them believe I had some serious issue that needed treatment might mean they’d be able to help me with the logistics around the kids and I wouldn’t have to tell them the real reason,” she said.

Rogers suggested that Patterson never planned to account for her cancer lie “because you thought that the lunch guests would die,” to which Patterson replied, “That’s not true.”

3. Patterson accepts there were death cap mushrooms in the food

Patterson said Tuesday that she accepts there must have been death cap mushrooms in the meal she made, an admission she had long withheld.

Advertisement

In the immediate aftermath of the incident, Patterson told doctors and investigators that she used two kinds of mushrooms for her dish: fresh from the grocery store and dried from a Chinese grocer in the area, though she couldn’t remember which one. In interviews with police, she denied owning a dehydrator and foraging for mushrooms.

On the opening day of the trial, however, her lawyer, Colin Mandy, confirmed those had been lies, but said Patterson “denies that she ever deliberately sought out death cap mushrooms.”

Patterson said on the stand that she started foraging for mushrooms at trails and botanical gardens in her area in early 2020, and joined Facebook groups to identify and learn about the different kinds.

The Victorian government issued a warning in early 2023 that death cap mushrooms were growing in the region. Patterson repeatedly said she couldn’t remember using the naturalist website that marked where the toxic mushrooms had been found.

Patterson acknowledged buying a food dehydrator in April 2023, but denied prosecutors’ allegation that she traveled to a nearby town to collect death cap mushrooms that same month. She admitted to disposing of the device after the lunch, but said she didn’t know death cap mushrooms had been in it.

Advertisement

She said while she was preparing the beef Wellington — which is typically coated in mushroom paste and wrapped in pastry — “it seemed a little bland to me, so I decided to put in the dried mushrooms that I’d bought from the grocer that I still had in the pantry.”

“I didn’t deliberately put death cap mushrooms in the meal,” Patterson said, but acknowledged she now thinks there was a chance that some of her foraged mushrooms were also in that Tupperware.

She said the possibility only occurred to her days later, as her relatives’ conditions deteriorated and toxicology tests confirmed death cap mushroom poisoning. She said she was talking to Simon in the hospital when the topic of her dehydrator came up, and he asked: “Is that how you poisoned my parents?”

She said his comment got her thinking about how she had dried foraged mushrooms in it weeks earlier.

“I was starting to think, ‘What if they’d gone in the container with the Chinese mushrooms? Maybe that had happened,’ ” Patterson said, adding it made her feel “really worried because Child Protection were involved and Simon seemed to be of the mind that maybe this was intentional. I just got really scared.”

Advertisement
Media crews assemble outside Latrobe Valley Magistrates' Court.

Media crews assemble outside Latrobe Valley Magistrates’ Court in May.

Martin Keep/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Martin Keep/AFP via Getty Images

Advertisement

4. Patterson says she lied to authorities out of fear

Prosecutors said that even as doctors confirmed the patients were suffering from “serious toxin syndrome caused by ingestion of amanita phalloides mushrooms,” they did not immediately receive the antidote because there was a lack of evidence to confirm they had ingested such mushrooms.

On Friday, Patterson confirmed she did not tell anyone about the possibility of the contaminated mushrooms. Rogers asked why she didn’t alert medical authorities as soon as it occurred to her, on Aug. 1.

“I had been told that people were getting treatment for possible death cap mushroom poisoning,” Patterson answered. “So that was already happening.”

Instead, she confirmed that the next day she drove her kids to school, came home and got rid of the dehydrator, taking it to what’s called a tip — a second-hand store at a waste facility.

Advertisement

Heather Wilkinson and Gail Patterson died on Aug. 4, and Donald Patterson died the following day. Ian Wilkison was extubated on Aug. 14 and discharged to rehab on Sept. 11.

She said she disposed of the dehydrator “in the context of thinking that maybe mushrooms that I’d foraged, or the meal I prepared was responsible for making people sick,” and that after she learned of the deaths, “it was this stupid, knee-jerk reaction to just dig deeper and keep lying.”

“I was just scared, but I shouldn’t have done it,” she added.

Patterson also said she did a factory reset of her cell phone during the police investigation because “I knew that there were photos in there of mushrooms and the dehydrator and I just panicked and didn’t want [detectives] to see them.”

That didn’t stop prosecutors from showing photos taken on her phone in April 2023, depicting wild mushrooms being weighed on a scale. They suggested Patterson had done so to calculate a lethal dose, which she denied.

Advertisement

Lifestyle

Firings at CBS’ ’60 Minutes’ reflect the fight for media control in the age of Trump

Published

on

Firings at CBS’ ’60 Minutes’ reflect the fight for media control in the age of Trump

Correspondents of CBS’ 60 Minutes pose for a portrait in 2023. From left to right, they are Sharyn Alfonsi, L. Jon Wertheim, Bill Whitaker, Lesley Stahl, Scott Pelley, Cecilia Vega, and Anderson Cooper. Former Executive Producer Bill Owens sits on the far right. Only Wertheim, Whitaker and Stahl remain at the program.

CBS Photo Archive/CBS via Getty Images/CBS


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

CBS Photo Archive/CBS via Getty Images/CBS

Stay up to date with our Up First newsletter sent every weekday morning.

When CBS fired Scott Pelley on Tuesday night, the new 60 Minutes executive producer, Nick Bilton, told Pelley it was for insubordination at a staff meeting the day before.

The veteran correspondent argues he was defending the DNA of 60 Minutes and the integrity of its journalism.

Advertisement

The battle royale over the network’s most prestigious and profitable news program is part of a broader fight over the direction of CBS News.

And given CBS’s acquisition by a billionaire family whose business interests have become intertwined with the political interests of President Trump, it reflects a larger war over control of the media in the current moment.

That father and son, Larry and David Ellison, bought CBS’ parent company, Paramount, last summer. In January, they became co-owners of TikTok’s U.S. operations. Now they’re seeking approval from Trump’s regulators to buy Warner Bros. Discovery, the parent company of CNN.

A glamorous show shorn, for now, of most its stars

CBS fired Cecilia Vega, a correspondent, and Tanya Simon, the executive producer, from 60 Minutes last week. They are shown in this photo at the 2026 White House Correspondents' Association Dinner on April 25, 2026 in Washington, D.C.

CBS fired Cecilia Vega, a correspondent, and Tanya Simon, the executive producer, from 60 Minutes last week. They are shown in this photo at the 2026 White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner on April 25, 2026 in Washington, D.C.

Kristina Bumphrey/Variety via Getty Images/Variety


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Kristina Bumphrey/Variety via Getty Images/Variety

But the specifics of this individual episode matter — for 60 Minutes, CBS, its audience of millions, and even the news business itself.

Advertisement

The program has been the most glamorous post in broadcast news. The correspondents are the stars of the show. And now, there are just three of them.

Anderson Cooper left last month, concerned over the direction of the network’s coverage. Last week was a virtual bloodbath: correspondents Cecilia Vega and Sharyn Alfonsi were fired. So were a producer and two show executives — including Tanya Simon, a longtime staffer who had stepped up as executive producer when her predecessor resigned in protest before the Ellisons’ takeover.

With Pelley’s ouster, only correspondents Lesley Stahl, Bill Whitaker, and Jon Wertheim remain. Now they are considering whether to resign, according to two associates with knowledge.

Their brand-new boss, Bilton, was previously a tech reporter for The New York Times and an investigative reporter for Vanity Fair. He executive-produced a documentary for Netflix about a couple accused of laundering Bitcoin and has been a producer on several other films.

Notably, he has no experience in television news.

Advertisement

Neither does Bari Weiss, whom David Ellison installed as the network’s editor in chief last October. The Ellisons also bought her center-right views-and-news site, The Free Press.

She has maintained that the network of Walter Cronkite needs a makeover for the digital moment. She has also contended for years that CBS, along with the rest of mainstream media, is too reflexively anti-Trump, anti-Israel, and too woke.

A rejection of CBS News executives’ overtures

The new executive producer of 60 Minutes, Nick Bilton, has been a tech journalist and documentary filmmaker, but lacks experience in broadcast news.

The new executive producer of 60 Minutes, Nick Bilton, has been a tech journalist and documentary filmmaker, but lacks experience in broadcast news.

Matt Winkelmeyer/Getty Images/Getty Images North America


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Matt Winkelmeyer/Getty Images/Getty Images North America

Bilton attempted to set a conciliatory tone at Monday’s meeting — his first with the show. Pelley, a formidable veteran correspondent and former CBS Evening News anchor, wasn’t having it.

Pelley called Bilton unwelcome and unqualified. And Pelley said that Weiss was attempting to “murder” the program.

Advertisement

In firing Pelley on Tuesday, Bilton said the journalist had hijacked the meeting and rejected overtures to work constructively through their differences. (NPR obtained a copy of the firing notice.) Bilton wrote that Pelley’s “antipathy to the future of the show came through loud and clear.”

In his own statement late Tuesday evening, shared with NPR, Pelley accused CBS’s new news leadership of killing 60 Minutes‘ DNA and pushing him “to inject falsehoods and bias into a politically sensitive story” and “to include assertions that are unverified.”

The accusations, to which CBS has not yet responded, echo those made by Alfonsi and Vega, the two correspondents fired last week.

Earlier this year, Alfonsi publicly complained after Weiss held one of her stories at the last minute, and kept it frozen for weeks, demanding an on-camera interview with a Trump White House official that never played out. It ran, unchanged from the intended version, with additional statements from the administration tacked on to the end.

After being fired, Vega said in a statement obtained by NPR that her team had “experienced efforts to insert political bias into our stories.”

Advertisement

“Let’s call this what it is: censorship, both censorship and self-driven” Vega continued. “It is dangerous for the show and dangerous for democracy.”

Weiss previously rejected Alfonsi’s and Vega’s allegations. (CBS said Vega’s claims, for example, were “not based in reality” while expressing appreciation for her work.)

Weiss and Bilton say digital threat requires a 60 Minutes overhaul now

In a meeting this morning, Weiss said that Pelley chose his own path — that is, to be fired rather than to find a way to work through his concerns, according to attendees. The network and Weiss have not yet publicly addressed Pelley’s accusations of interference. 

Bilton and Weiss say they respect the show’s traditions, its accomplishments and its legacy of enterprise reporting, extended interviews and visual storytelling. It rose in the ratings 9% over the past season under Simon.

The two news leaders say, however, 60 Minutes needs to be overhauled before it becomes increasingly irrelevant in the era of streamers and other sources of news, information and entertainment in the digital age.

Advertisement

Interviews with 12 current and former CBS News staffers, from producers to executives, suggest great reservations and suspicions remain about Weiss’ judgment and her ability to handle the prominent and even famous journalists on whom her division relies.

Weiss had initially sought to reinvent the CBS Evening News, dropping a two-anchor format that had sagged in the ratings. Cooper turned down Weiss’ overtures to anchor it and left the network altogether, concerned about her approach, according to associates. (They spoke on condition of anonymity because Cooper has not chosen to speak publicly on the matter.)

David Ellison became chairman and CEO of CBS' parent company, Paramount, after buying it last year.

David Ellison became chairman and CEO of CBS’ parent company, Paramount, after buying it last year.

Noam Galai/Getty Images for Paramount/Getty Images North America


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Noam Galai/Getty Images for Paramount/Getty Images North America

The ratings have continued to sag under new anchor Tony Dokoupil. And some CBS journalists, including producers who have left the Evening News, have publicly accused Weiss of making editorial decisions driven by politics. She has rejected those claims.

The decision to take on overhauling two key shows — one listing, one highly profitable, both high profile — carries significant risks for Weiss and the network, even apart from other considerations.

Advertisement

But the Ellisons’ presence cannot be ignored.

When Shari Redstone was negotiating the sale of CBS’s parent company, Paramount, to the Ellisons’ Skydance Media last year, the network announced the end of Stephen Colbert’s late night show. He had been one of the president’s most biting and acerbic critics.

David Ellison also made a series of concessions directly to Trump’s chief broadcast regulator, Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr, gutting CBS’s diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives and appointing a conservative ombudsman to field complaints of bias against its news reporting.

Carr and other regulators approved the Paramount deal last summer.

The accommodations echo those made by other media titans.

Advertisement

Amazon and Blue Origin founder Jeff Bezos remade the editorial pages of the Washington Post, which he owns, into a far more hospitable zone for Trump at the outset of his second term. So did Los Angeles Times owner Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, a noted medical device inventor. Amazon and Blue Origin have multi-billion dollar contracts with the federal government. Soon-Shiong’s medical research firm routinely has patent applications up for review with federal regulators. One was approved Tuesday.

The Ellisons are hoping to win approval from federal regulators next month for their purchase of Warner Bros. Discovery in a deal valued at more than $110 billion. It would include Warner Bros. Studio, HBO and CNN, among other properties.

As Weiss routs CBS News’ old guard, the question of what role she might play at CNN — and what changes that portends at CBS — hangs over journalists at the two networks. The fate of 60 Minutes serves as a high-stakes case study for both.

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

We’re having a main character summer. Are you? : It’s Been a Minute

Published

on

We’re having a main character summer. Are you? : It’s Been a Minute
Are you ready for a whirlwind summer romance?Making plans to capitalize on summer can get overwhelming – from finding the right spot to hang or feeling comfortable in your clothes in the sweltering summer heat. So what does it mean to approach summer with a romantic joie de vivre?  Brittany is joined by Carly Olson, freelance journalist covering architecture and business, and Garrett Schlichte, writer and chef, to walk us through how to have a rom-com summer where you’re the star.Want more on how to be the best version of yourself? Check out these episodes:How to make friends & get good gossipIt only takes 30 minutes to be a good momSupport Public Media. Join NPR Plus.Follow Brittany on Instagram: @bmluseFor handpicked podcast recommendations every week, subscribe to NPR’s Pod Club newsletter at npr.org/podclub.
Continue Reading

Lifestyle

Vintage-obsessed millennial parents are driving L.A.’s booming kids’ clothing resale market

Published

on

Vintage-obsessed millennial parents are driving L.A.’s booming kids’ clothing resale market

Kids’ vintage clothing sales are experiencing a remarkable boom at in-person markets and online, where prices for clothes for little ones have shot up on websites including Depop and Poshmark. Millennial parents are looking to outfit their kids in the clothes and TV and film characters they loved (or coveted) when they were kids.

The result? There’s a new generation of kiddos hitting the playground looking incredibly cool. Take Amari Case, a SoCal toddler who spent a Sunday afternoon this spring ambling around a vintage market in a West Hollywood warehouse clad in baggy jeans and a ’90s-era tee emblazoned with the “Dragon Ball Z” character Son Goku.

When she wasn’t scribbling on a Lorax coloring sheet, she’d been cruising around the market with her dad, Aaron Munoz Case, snapping up new pieces destined to make her the flyest kid at the preschool playground.

Neil Wright, from left, Kristine Nite Scalzo and Brandon Rosenblatt, co-founders of Elemeno Kids Vintage Market.

Advertisement

Showing off Amari’s new vintage satin L.A. Raiders jacket and tiny teal Grant Hill Detroit Pistons jersey, Munoz Case, who was also impeccably dressed, noted that while Amari went through a phase at about 18 months where she wanted to dress herself, eventually she gave up and went back to letting her dripped-out dad dictate her wardrobe.

Munoz Case found Amari’s first vintage piece at the Rose Bowl Flea Market and got the bug, going back every month to pick up something to add to his little’s wardrobe.

Trendspotters and researchers say Munoz Case isn’t alone in his quest. The market for kids’ vintage clothing has heated up precipitously over the last few years, perhaps hitting a boiling point in January when an Eeyore romper from the ’90s sold for over $3,000 on EBay. (It was new with tags, but one without tags still went for almost a grand about a month later.)

The thirst for tiny throwbacks is so popular that first-ever, all-kids market Elemeno — named after the “L-M-N-O” bit of “The Alphabet Song” and where Amari was toddling and shopping — drew 17 vendors and over 2,000 attendees over a single weekend in March. (There are plans for another Elemeno Kids Vintage Market pop-up later this year in New York, as well as plans to bring the event back to L.A. sometime next year.)

1

Advertisement
A child and mom seated.

2 A child wearing an Avirex jacket from the ’90s.

1. Cameron Scalzo, wearing a vintage McDonald’s T-shirt from the ‘90s, and mom Kristine Nite Scalzo. 2. Cameron Scalzo rocks an Avirex jacket from the ‘90s.

Eye Speak Vintage’s Kristine Nite Scalzo, who co-organized the event and is opening an all-kids vintage store in Pasadena this month, says she fell under the kids vintage spell in 2020 when she was pregnant with her son. She’d always been a vintage shopper for herself, so she knew she wanted to pass the passion down to the next generation. She started filling up her son’s closet, and soon enough, she found herself selling her other finds out of a bodega in her garage.

She has a by-appointment space in Pasadena now, where she draws everyone from Rihanna’s stylist to out-of-town moms who make a point to stop by on their way to Disneyland. “The community around kids vintage has really skyrocketed on Instagram over the past six years,” Scalzo says. “We want to know who we’re buying from. We want to know that we’re doing good with buying secondhand. And it’s a hobby for people that can turn into a possible business on the side. Because knowing there’s a big group that’s interested in vintage kids clothes, you can always pass an item [your kid outgrows] to someone else or resell it.”

Scalzo says some parents are out digging through bins at the Goodwill Outlet looking for the perfect piece, while others are content to pay up for, say, a ’90s Simpsons T-shirt or a mini-size Harley-Davidson jacket. Scouring the racks at the Elemeno market, most pieces cost $15 to $40, though there were special pieces pulled to the side in some booths with price tags that could make a parent’s eyes pop. (Think $275 for a set of well-worn Spider-Man overalls from the ’00s or $150 for a pair of Cross Colours denim shorts from the ’90s.)

Advertisement

In kids and adult vintage alike, mint condition is highly valued. No matter the era in which they were raised, kids tend to be messy. They get strawberry juice on their shirts or scuff up the knees on their Bugle Boy jeans. Vintage kids clothes that look pristine are more expensive, and while plain kids clothes do sell, items with characters on them or cool prints tend to draw more attention and dollars.

Brandon Rosenblatt, another of the Elemeno organizers, says he’s had his eye on a specific kids “Back to the Future” shirt for some time, but notes that it typically sells for about $1,000. He’s partial to McKids clothes for his daughter, from McDonald’s short-lived kids clothing brand, noting that he’s even snagged her a vintage official McDonald’s-themed aloha shirt from Hawaii, something he says he’s never seen anywhere else.

1 Siblings Amora and Milo Castilo wear vintage cowboy hats, jackets and chaps.

2 Thalia Castilo and her kids Amora and Milo.

1. Siblings Amora and Milo Castilo wear vintage cowboy hats, jackets and chaps. 2. Thalia Castilo and her kids Amora and Milo.

Advertisement

Other collectors, he says, might be a little less obscure, leaning into mainstream characters such as Strawberry Shortcake or from ’80s and ’90s properties including “The Land Before Time” and “Rugrats.”

“A lot of millennials are having kids — like everyone who’s in their 30s and 40s — and they all want to put their kids in the same IP they grew up in,” Rosenblatt says.

“It’s the thrill of the hunt that gets everyone so excited,” Scalzo says. “Once you find that perfect nostalgic piece, you’re like ‘Holy s—,’ and you just want to chase that feeling again and again.”

Mia De La Rosa, a reseller who was at the Elemeno market, says that like Scalzo, she started buying kids vintage clothes when she was pregnant with her daughter, Liv, who’s 6 now, very into everything on PBS Kids and has a closet full of thrifted vintage garb covered in characters such as D.W., the annoying little sister from the ’90s show “Arthur.”

Everything Liv wears is “completely her style,” De La Rosa says. “She dresses herself every day and she gets compliments on what she’s wearing at school all the time.”

Advertisement

Other vintage-wearing kids — and in particular younger ones — might simply be sporting what their parents like or might just like the look of the shirt even if they don’t know what it’s advertising. (An 8-year-old boy at the Elemeno market, for instance, chose to wear a pristine T-shirt highlighting the ’90s Jim Carrey movie “The Mask” because it featured his favorite color: green.)

Derrick Broaster, a vintage enthusiast turned full-time reseller, says that while he chooses to put himself in clothes from the ’60s and ’70s, he outfits his two sons in clothes from the 2000s. (“How Bow Wow used to dress when he was a kid,” he says.)

Although his younger son tends to rebel against Broaster’s vintage picks, opting for whatever Spider-Man shoes happen to be in his eyeline, his older son has leaned in, letting his dad advise him on what vintage pieces could work and what would be the most stylish.

1 Brothers pose for a portrait wearing vintage clothing.

2 A family poses for a portrait wearing vintage clothing.

1. Julian, left, and Javier Gutierrez show off their vintage clothing. Javier says his mom always tells him to keep his vintage outfits clean. 2. Mom Priscilla Guzman, clockwise, Dad Javier Gutierrez and sons Julian and Javier Gutierrez enjoy the vibe of vintage clothing. Guzman says she’s been buying and selling kids’ vintage since her oldest son was born eight years ago.

Advertisement

Rosenblatt says a good portion of what vintage finds he sees in the market now has returned to the U.S. from places in Central America and South America or Asia where those pieces were likely sent decades ago after they were donated or given away.

“There’s a real underbelly of this vintage game with rag houses getting access to bulk product overseas and letting people sort through it,” he says. “There are companies now that rip through 20, 30 or 40,000 pieces of vintage clothing a week. It’s a really interesting ecosystem.”

For many kids vintage sellers, finding their stock is just as fun and interesting as getting it back into consumers’ hands. “Anywhere we can find clothes, we’re there,” says Matthew Carlos, owner of Long Gone Youth. He started selling vintage clothes 11 years ago, when he was 15, switched to kids vintage at 20 and has spent the last six years scouring flea markets, websites and swap meets.

“The kids market is definitely growing,” he says, “but I still feel like we haven’t even gotten close to where we can go. It’s just getting popular now, but the more events [like Elemeno] we can do, the more it’ll go mainstream.” Even now, some major brands like Gap and OshKosh B’gosh have recognized the interest in some of their styles from the ’80s and ’90s, moving to re-release the looks in limited runs.

Advertisement
Jackie and Frank Oropeza with daughter Rumi Mae shop at Elemeno Kids Vintage Market.

Jackie and Frank Oropeza with daughter Rumi Mae shop at Elemeno Kids Vintage Market.

Kids resale is also leaning into streetwear culture. Rosenblatt, who worked in the streetwear industry, says that he’s noticed that a good portion of those interested in kids vintage — particularly, male shoppers — tend to be fans of streetwear brands like Supreme, Fear of God Essentials and Bape. At Elemeno, for instance, a good portion of the parents we saw pushing strollers were well-dressed dads seemingly on solo missions, something you don’t always see at kid-centric events.

“I just want my son to feel like I did as a kid,” said Justin Nguyen, while watching his toddler, Jayden, play with bubbles. “I want him to be happy, carefree and joyful, and I want to be able to spend time with him. My mom and dad were always working, even on the weekends. Now that I’m a dad, taking my son out on weekends to do stuff like this just seems like a blessing.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending