Connect with us

News

Italy retains allure for rich Europeans fleeing higher taxes

Published

on

Italy retains allure for rich Europeans fleeing higher taxes

Wealthy UK and French taxpayers still want to relocate to Italy despite Rome’s recent decision to double its flat tax on the foreign income of rich expats to €200,000 a year.

With the looming abolition of Britain’s historic “non-dom” tax regime, advisers claim Italy remains a highly attractive alternative.

“People move not just because of tax, but because they might like the Italian Riviera, the Italian Alps, the architecture, culture, people,” said Miles Dean, head of international tax at accountancy firm Andersen, who claimed non-doms were looking to leave the UK “in huge numbers”.

Several consultants in the Eurozone’s third-largest economy say they are receiving a steady stream of inquiries from France, where an unstable political climate has fuelled concerns over higher taxes on the wealthy.

In August, Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s rightwing government unexpectedly doubled Italy’s annual levy on overseas income for new tax residents to €200,000 a year.

Advertisement

The move followed grumbles among Italians about the fairness of a flat tax rate set in 2016 as part of a post-Brexit push to lure wealthy people away from the UK. The scheme is estimated to have attracted 2,730 multimillionaires, including oligarchs, private equity investors and even sportspeople, most of whom have set up residence in Milan.

However, Meloni said her government had “considered it right” to update a tax incentive that had seemed “extremely generous”, as the original €100,000 flat tax had not increased since the scheme’s inception.

“The increase from €100,000 to €200,000 does not make a huge difference for multimillionaires that have large foreign incomes,” said Marco Cerrato, partner at tax firm Maisto e Associati in Milan. “Individuals that we have been advising and that have planned to transfer to Italy after 2025 have not changed their plans.”

Maurizio Fresca, an international tax consultant at Italian law firm Chiomenti, said his clients were not so much concerned about the higher tax but about “the politics” behind Rome’s decision, and what that might suggest about the scheme’s long-term durability.

“When high net worth individuals want to relocate to another country, €100,000 a year is not something that holds them back,” Fresca said. “They want to be reassured that this regime will be in force in the future.”

Advertisement

Fresca said Meloni’s government had increased the tax amount to defuse growing public discontent about generous incentives for wealthy foreigners.

“The Italian government wants to avoid a political discussion about the fairness of the lump sum,” Fresca said, adding that €100,000 was seen as “cheap” after several years of high inflation.

Consultants also said Rome had handled the change deftly.

The new rate will only apply to newcomers establishing tax residency in Italy after the change was approved, while existing participants are grandfathered in at the old rate. No other detail has been altered, which had served to reinforce a sense of the scheme’s stability.

Jacopo Zamboni, executive director for private clients at Henley & Partners, which helps wealthy people obtain investment visas and foreign citizenships, said the tax rise was “not perceived as legal uncertainty”.

Advertisement

“Clients see it as an adaptation of the price to the current circumstances,” he said.

Zamboni said inquiries about Italy from British and French residents were up 10 per cent in August this year compared with August 2023.

The increase in the flat tax is expected to discourage some people without sufficient foreign assets or income from making an Italian move. But Cerrato said that could help to avoid a situation in which the incentive scheme is abolished due to “an excessive influx of wealthy foreigners that impact the housing market”.

The participants pay the flat tax on all overseas income and assets for up to 15 years, while shielding them from tax claims elsewhere through double tax treaties.

Many potential beneficiaries were initially wary, given Italy’s reputation for quick changes of government and rapid shifts in policy. But the incentives have proved surprisingly durable. So far they have survived five governments. 

Advertisement

The abolition of the non-dom regime in the UK, alongside plans by the new Labour government to raise taxes, has led some current UK residents to consider moving elsewhere.

In France, an inconclusive parliamentary election in July had prompted a flood of calls from wealthy French residents to their advisers seeking options to shift their assets, were a leftwing alliance to take power and reintroduce wealth taxes.

A conservative, Michel Barnier, has instead been appointed prime minister since, although uncertainty over whether the government will hold has added to incentives for people to look for alternatives.

Italy is one of several popular destinations, which also include traditional tax havens Monaco and Switzerland, as well as Dubai, Greece, Cyprus and Malta.

Tax is not the only factor that drives people’s decision making, advisers say. “A lot of these things come down to lifestyle, connectivity,” Dean said. “There is no one size fits all.”

Advertisement

Additional reporting by Sarah White in Paris

News

Map: 4.9-Magnitude Earthquake Shakes Louisiana

Published

on

Map: 4.9-Magnitude Earthquake Shakes Louisiana

Note: Map shows the area with a shake intensity of 4 or greater, which U.S.G.S. defines as “light,” though the earthquake may be felt outside the areas shown.  All times on the map are Central time. The New York Times

A light, 4.9-magnitude earthquake struck in Louisiana on Thursday, according to the United States Geological Survey.

The temblor happened at 5:30 a.m. Central time about 6 miles west of Edgefield, La., data from the agency shows.

U.S.G.S. data earlier reported that the magnitude was 4.4.

As seismologists review available data, they may revise the earthquake’s reported magnitude. Additional information collected about the earthquake may also prompt U.S.G.S. scientists to update the shake-severity map.

Advertisement

Source: United States Geological Survey | Notes: Shaking categories are based on the Modified Mercalli Intensity scale. When aftershock data is available, the corresponding maps and charts include earthquakes within 100 miles and seven days of the initial quake. All times above are Central time. Shake data is as of Thursday, March 5 at 8:40 a.m. Eastern. Aftershocks data is as of Thursday, March 5 at 10:46 a.m. Eastern.

Continue Reading

News

Donald Trump has no ‘phase two’ plan for Iran war, says US senator

Published

on

Donald Trump has no ‘phase two’ plan for Iran war, says US senator

To read this article for free

Register now

Once registered, you can:

• Read free articles
• Get our Editor’s Digest and other newsletters
• Follow topics and set up personalised events
• Access Alphaville: our popular markets and finance blog

Continue Reading

News

Man accused of plot to assassinate Trump testifies Iran pressured him, says Biden and Haley were other possible targets

Published

on

Man accused of plot to assassinate Trump testifies Iran pressured him, says Biden and Haley were other possible targets

The allegation sounded like the stuff of spy movies: A Pakistani businessman trying to hire hit men, even handing them $5,000 in cash, to kill a U.S. politician on behalf of Iran ‘s powerful paramilitary Revolutionary Guard.

It was true, and potential targets of the 2024 scheme included now-President Donald Trump, then-President Joe Biden and former presidential candidate and ex-U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley, the man told jurors at his attempted terrorism trial in New York on Wednesday. But he insisted his actions were driven by fear for loved ones in Iran, and he figured he’d be apprehended before anything came of the scheme.

“My family was under threat, and I had to do this,” the defendant, Asif Merchant, testified through an Urdu interpreter. “I was not wanting to do this so willingly.”

Merchant said he had anticipated getting arrested before anyone was killed, intended to cooperate with the U.S. government and had hoped that would help him get a green card.

U.S. authorities were, indeed, on to him – the supposed hit men he paid were actually undercover FBI agents – and he was arrested on July 12, 2024, a day before an unrelated attempt on Trump’s life in Butler, Pennsylvania.  During a search, investigators said they found a handwritten note that contained the codewords for the various aspects of the plot, CBS News previously reported

Advertisement

Merchant did sit for voluntary FBI interviews, but he ultimately ended up with a trial, not a cooperation deal.

“You traveled to the United States for the purpose of hiring Mafia members to kill a politician, correct?” Assistant U.S. Attorney Nina Gupta asked during her turn questioning Merchant Wednesday in a Brooklyn federal court.

“That’s right,” Merchant replied, his demeanor as matter-of-fact as his testimony was unusual.

The trial is unfolding amid the less than week-old Iran war, which killed Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in a strike that Trump summed up as “I got him before he got me.” Jurors are instructed to ignore news pertaining to the case.

The Iranian government has denied plotting to kill Trump or other U.S. officials.

Advertisement

Merchant, 47, had a roughly 20-year banking career in Pakistan before getting involved in an array of businesses: clothing, car sales, banana exports, insulation imports. He openly has two families, one in Pakistan and the other in Iran – where, he said, he was introduced around the end of 2022 to a Revolutionary Guard intelligence operative. They initially spoke about getting involved in a hawala, an informal money transfer system, Merchant said.

Merchant testified that his periodic visits to the U.S. for his garment business piqued the interest of his Revolutionary Guard contact, who trained him on countersurveillance techniques.

The U.S. deems the Revolutionary Guard a “foreign terrorist organization.” Formally called the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, the force has been prominent in Iran under Khamenei.

Merchant said the handler told him to seek U.S. residents interested in working for Iran. Then came another assignment: Look for a criminal to arrange protests, steal things, do some money laundering, “and maybe have somebody murdered,” Merchant recalled.

“He did not tell me exactly who it is, but he told me – he named three people: Donald Trump, Joe Biden and Nikki Haley,” he added.

Advertisement

In 2024, multiple sources familiar with the investigation told CBS News Merchant planned to assassinate current and former government officials across the political spectrum.

Merchant allegedly sketched out the plot on a napkin inside his New York hotel room, prosecutors said, and told the individual “that there would be ‘security all around’ the person” they were planning to kill.

“No other option”

After U.S. immigration agents pulled Merchant aside at the Houston airport in April 2024, searched his possessions and asked about his travels to Iran, he concluded that he was under surveillance. But still he researched Trump rally locations, sketched out a plot for a shooting at a political rally, lined up the supposed hit men and scrambled together $5,000 from a cousin to pay them a “token of appreciation.”

This image provided by the Justice Department, contained in the complaint supporting the arrest warrant, shows Asif Merchant. 

Advertisement

AP


He even reported back to his Revolutionary Guard contact, sending observations – fake, Merchant said – tucked into a book that he shipped to Iran through a series of intermediaries.

Merchant said he “had no other option” than to play along because the handler had indicated that he knew who Merchant’s Iranian relatives were and where they lived.

In a court filing this week, prosecutors noted that Merchant didn’t seek out law enforcement to help with his purported predicament before he was arrested. He testified that he couldn’t turn to authorities because his handler had people watching him.

Prosecutors also said that in his FBI interviews, Merchant “neglected to mention any facts that could have supported” an argument that he acted under duress.

Advertisement

Merchant told jurors Wednesday that he didn’t think agents would believe his story, because their questions suggested “they think that I’m some type of super-spy.”

“And are you a super-spy?” defense lawyer Avraham Moskowitz asked.

“No,” Merchant said. “Absolutely not.”

Continue Reading

Trending