Connect with us

News

ISIS-linked militants are threatening huge natural gas reserves the world needs badly right now | CNN

Published

on

ISIS-linked militants are threatening huge natural gas reserves the world needs badly right now | CNN



CNN
 — 

Asmani Dadi had heard rumors in regards to the insurgents. Then, at some point, they got here true.

It was July 2020 and Dadi was a pupil within the city of Mocímboa da Praia, northern Mozambique.

“They got here … from the forest and commenced to kill folks. Once they discovered youngsters, … they stole them again to the forest. And after they discover males… they minimize off their heads,” Dadi recalled.

The assault was only one in a festering insurgency by ISIS-linked militants within the southern African nation that has killed no less than 4000 civilians and displaced almost a million folks, in keeping with the United Nations Refugee Company, UNHCR.

Advertisement

“They first arrived on this space to unfold their propaganda. To say they have been Muslim males. However Muslim males mustn’t kill like this,” mentioned Dadi.

Mozambique has big pure fuel reserves – a useful resource that, if exploited successfully, might change its fortunes and assist the world because it struggles to search out sufficient pure fuel to warmth houses and gasoline business following Russia’s struggle on Ukraine. The insurgency, nevertheless, jeopardizes Mozambique’s complete financial future, and the battle towards the militants is now worldwide.

Troopers and navy personnel from 10 nations are combating the fighters. Amongst them are Rwandan forces which have now largely regained management of a portion of Mozambique’s northernmost Cabo Delgado province, which is house to Palma and Mocímboa da Praia.

Whether or not Mozambique and its allies can stamp out the insurgency altogether is a query that has world repercussions as international locations hunt for brand new sources of liquefied pure fuel (LNG).

Advertisement

Mozambique is likely one of the poorest nations on earth however its offshore riches might make it one of many richest international locations within the area. In early 2010, an infinite fuel subject was found within the Rovuma basin, close to Mozambique’s border with Tanzania.

With already greater than 100 trillion cubic ft of confirmed offshore pure fuel reserves, one business insider likened its future potential equal to Russia – a pure fuel big.

Because the European Union makes an attempt to wean itself off Russian LNG after President Vladimir Putin’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine, the necessity for future sources from non-aligned international locations like Mozambique is vital, says Paul Eardley-Taylor, director of Oil & Gasoline, Southern Africa at Customary Financial institution.

Mozambique has huge natural gas reserves which, if managed effectively, could transform its fortunes.

“Mozambique is vital because it’s a really massive discover; has low CO2 fuel; is a perfect geography for Southeast Asia however can even service Europe and East Asia,” he mentioned.

Many business consultants see LNG as a perfect transition gasoline as international locations transfer from coal to renewable power to fight local weather change, although some local weather activists consider that the transition ought to skip LNG fully as a result of at the same time as a cleaner supply of gasoline, it does contribute to world warming.

Advertisement

In sensible phrases, the world will rely upon LNG provide within the foreseeable future. And the struggle in Ukraine has rattled expectations of each worth and provide.

“Gasoline costs are upwards of anyplace to eight occasions what they have been earlier than the invasion of Ukraine. Not simply costs, however the availability of provide. The flexibility for the world markets to have extra fuel out there – particularly LNG – is big,” mentioned a senior US State Division diplomat who carefully watches Mozambique.

After the discover, main oil suppliers reminiscent of TotalEnergies, ExxonMobil, and others flooded in.

Mozambique confronted a radical transformation; the federal government promised human growth could be on the middle of its technique. However with out a lot delay, a number of officers turned embroiled in a corruption scandal value billions of {dollars}.

However a much more lethal menace was brewing.

Advertisement

On the ridge above Mocímboa da Praia, the market stalls are simply burnt-out husks, proof of the battle to retake the city from the ISIS-linked fighters.

They held Mocímboa for a yr till Rwandan forces pushed them out. However the earliest recognized rebel assaults within the nation occurred in late 2017.

At first, small teams of males struck with golf equipment and machetes. They appeared to seize weapons from the Mozambican police and navy at will. Machetes turned AK-47s; AK-47s turned RPGs and grenades.

The group started calling for followers on-line and began attacking greater cities. Their terrible signature turned beheading safety forces and civilians to sow terror.

Referred to as Ansar al-Sunnah wa al Jamma’ah, or Shabaab (no connection to the Somali group of the identical title), in 2021 the US State Division branded the militants as ISIS-Mozambique.

Advertisement

Their motivations, organizational construction, and management stay opaque.

“It’s actually vital to emphasise how little is thought. And the intelligence deficit has been a central problem for the federal government and safety forces in coping with this insurgency,” mentioned Piers Pigou, a senior marketing consultant for Southern Africa on the Worldwide Disaster Group (ICG).

In March final yr, the militants staged one among their most brazen assaults and overran the city of Palma in Cabo Delgado, abandoning a path of our bodies, some beheaded.

A woman cries as she waits for her son to arrive in Pemba on April 1, 2021, from the boat of evacuees from the coasts of Palma. - More than a thousand people evacuated from the shores of the town of Palma arrived at the sea port of Pemba after insurgents attacked Palma on March 24, 2021.

Few safety analysts publicly believed a profitable assault was doable, as a considerable drive of Mozambican navy was posted within the space.

The militants had activated sleeper cells within the financial hub, nevertheless, and attacked from three completely different instructions.

Advertisement

Through the raid, ISIS-Mozambique destroyed a cell tower to chop communications and beheaded a number of truck drivers on the routes into Palma, robbing banks and looting shops as they went.

The Mozambican forces, as had occurred a number of occasions in smaller cities, have been unable to cease them. Many Mozambican and international employees sought refuge within the Amarula lodge.

Fighting between the terrorist group and the Mozambican army and Rwandan Security forces has left its mark on the town.

Over the house of a number of days, a South African mercenary group evacuated a few of them. Others arrange a convoy to make a determined escape. They have been ambushed on their approach out.

Scores have been killed within the Palma assault and 1000’s displaced, many scrambling onto boats to get to Pemba, the regional capital. Authorities forces finally regained management. However folks have been too scared to come back again.

The assault had devastating financial penalties. TotalEnergies declared drive majeure (a case of unforeseeable circumstances that forestall it from fulfilling a contract) and shut down its huge Afungi fuel growth close by.

Advertisement

The Mozambican authorities, lengthy accused of downplaying the insurgency, confronted the very actual prospect of dropping each its financial future and all the province of Cabo Delgado to ISIS-Mozambique.

The Mozambican authorities didn’t reply to requests for touch upon this story.

The Mozambican navy and police had struggled to fight the insurgents from the very begin. Regardless of a brutal civil struggle after independence in 1975, or maybe due to it, their forces have appeared demotivated and undersupplied in keeping with a number of outdoors observers.

However international forces from close by international locations have now stepped in.

Standing amongst the right rows of prefabricated housing on the Afungi web site is Brig. Gen. Ronald Rwivanga, of the Rwandan Defence Power. With him are a bunch of journalists, together with CNN, embedded with the Rwandan forces in a uncommon alternative to get into Cabo Delgado.

Advertisement

“The primary stage will likely be to indicate the inhabitants that you’ve militarily defeated the insurgents. The subsequent step needs to be to rebuild lives. To make sure that all people feels that sense of safety. And that requires you to be current. The forces should be there,” Rwivanga advised CNN.

Rwandan navy and police have secured a big swath of land between Palma and Mocímboa da Praia and into the inside. Southern African forces, as a part of a regional block deployment, are tasked with different zones.

A Rwandan Policeman stands guard as women and children pump water out of well in the village of Olumbi in Cabo Delgado province in Mozambique in Sep. 2022.

They finally bought right here after a collection of half-measures and failed options.

The EU has given substantial monetary backing, and the US and the European bloc have equipped coaching, however the outcomes are nonetheless spotty.

In a bid to stamp out the insurgency, the Mozambican authorities regarded to the surface, first hiring the infamous Wagner Group, Russian mercenaries with hyperlinks to the Kremlin.

Advertisement

It later engaged the Dyke Advisory Group (DAG), a small mercenary operation led by Lionel Dyck, a former colonel within the Zimbabwe navy.

Within the wake of the assault on Palma and the halting of Mozambique’s fuel potential, the Mozambican authorities wanted to discover a resolution rapidly.

The reply got here from Paul Kagame, long-time president of Rwanda and, famously, former navy commander. On the invitation of Mozambican President Filipe Nyusi, Rwanda dispatched frontline forces and specialised police to Cabo Delgado in July 2021.

Their progress was swift as they attacked main insurgent-controlled cities and base camps, retaking Mocímboa in August 2021.

A yr on, the Rwandan officers are at pains to indicate that their space of management is returning to normalcy.

Advertisement

There may be some proof of that. On the roads main into their former villages, vans, and buses ladened with the belongings of returning folks stream steadily by.

“They have been burning homes, killing folks in every single place. I used to be with my household after I noticed them doing it, so we needed to run,” mentioned Benjamin Thomas, who’s sitting at the back of a white truck, because the passengers cross round a bottle of water within the stifling warmth, “I heard there may be peace now, so I got here house.”

Thomas and others mentioned they got here again to search out what was left and to flee what they are saying are horrible circumstances within the sprawling camps for the displaced to the south of Mozambique.

Faculties are nonetheless closed in a lot of the area after lecturers and directors fled, and well being care, uncared for even earlier than the insurgency, is sorely missing.

Women waiting to be seen by medical staff at the village of Quionga Cabo DelGado province in northern Mozambique where the Rwandan army set up a mobile clinic to treat people for the day.

Some human rights activists are suspicious that simply sufficient is being executed for the fuel initiatives to restart with out a public relations backlash.

Advertisement

“There’s a prioritization of optics for the world to see that these areas are superb and subsequently funding ought to come, slightly than a prioritization of primary circumstances for folks to return,” mentioned Zenaida Machado, a senior researcher for Human Rights Watch.

“Being surrounded by troopers isn’t normalcy,” she advised CNN.

It’s a delicate subject for TotalEnergies and at Afungi their representatives weren’t licensed to talk.

“The scenario is getting higher, however the restart of our undertaking in Afungi is conditional on the restoration of safety in a sustainable approach in northern Cabo Delgado and the normalization of the scenario with regard to the native inhabitants,” a TotalEnergies consultant mentioned in a written assertion to questions from CNN.

A spokesperson for Eni, the Italian power firm, confirmed to CNN that  a separate LNG growth of a offshore floating LNG ship referred to as Coral Sul started LNG manufacturing this yr and its first cargo is predicted this quarter.

Advertisement

However the scenario on land,, in a lot of the province and past, continues to be very unstable.

A family sitting in the back of a pick-up truck with their belonging as they return to their village.

It’s sadly a type of whack-a-mole strategy. Should you hit them right here, they pop up there,” mentioned Pigou of ICG.

Collectively along with his staff, Pigou has been monitoring a number of latest incidents, together with lethal assaults and beheadings, largely outdoors of the Rwandan zone of management.

There may be additionally rising proof of nearer ties to ISIS within the Center East and the transfer in the direction of terror techniques like improvised explosive units, say Pigou and Joe van Der Walt, CEO of Focus Group, a South African threat administration firm.

“The safety scenario has modified, and the dynamics have modified, however the insurgents themselves have demonstrated a propensity for adaptation and survival,” mentioned the senior State Division diplomat, including that ISIS-Mozambique continues to be actively recruiting and coaching contained in the province and past.

Advertisement

They stress that creating the area, giving folks one thing to hope for, is the important thing to extinguishing the specter of ISIS-Mozambique earlier than it takes the well-trodden path of insurgencies in different areas of the continent just like the Sahel and Somalia.

Most agree that the window to stamp out the insurgency is slim.

“The very first thing about coping with an insurgency is that you should take care of the basis causes of the insurgency. In fact, the very very first thing you should do is defeat the insurgents in a navy operation, however after that, you should attempt to win hearts and minds,” mentioned Rwivanga.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Shipbuilder Fincantieri strikes underwater defence deal

Published

on

Shipbuilder Fincantieri strikes underwater defence deal

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Italy’s Fincantieri has acquired the submarine unit of defence group Leonardo in a deal valuing the asset at up to €415mn, as Europe’s largest shipbuilder seeks to build up its military business.

The agreement, under which Fincantieri will pay Leonardo €300mn and an additional amount of up to €115mn depending on certain targets being met this year, was announced on Thursday evening along with Fincantieri’s latest capital raise of up to €400mn. The funding round, backed by state investor Cassa Depositi e Prestiti, will finance the group’s acquisition.

Fincantieri’s purchase of Tuscany-based Wass, which makes underwater missiles and sonars, will strengthen the state-controlled company’s defence and security operations. The company manufactures both cruise and military vessels as well as submarines, and aims to expand its underwater business.

Advertisement

It comes at a time when governments are seeking to protect critical underwater infrastructure assets such as telecommunication cables and energy pipelines from rogue actors.

The war in Ukraine and the 2022 Nord Stream pipeline sabotage incident have highlighted the importance of underwater security. With more underwater drones being used in the Black Sea, the conflict has underlined the importance of underwater defences.

Italy’s government is also seeking to streamline its underwater security systems, establishing a national research centre to foster business opportunities in the sector.

Leonardo, under chief executive Roberto Cingolani, has been divesting non-core assets and eyeing acquisitions. The company, which is also controlled by the government, has been looking to strengthen partnerships with other defence contractors across Europe and focus on its technology platform.

Fincantieri and Leonardo also have a joint venture, called Orizzonte Sistemi Navali, which manufactures warship systems.

Advertisement

In its new business plan presented last year, the Italian shipbuilder identified the underwater security business as a key growth pillar. The defence sector accounts for one-fourth of its €7.6bn revenues.

In its presentation, Fincantieri estimated the global underwater sector, including defence, telecommunications, energy and oil and gas, to be worth up to €400bn — with defence playing a leading role — by 2030. Shares in the company have rallied almost a third since its release.

In February, Fincantieri completed the acquisition of Remazel Engineering, a company based north of Milan that specialises in designing and supplying highly complex topside equipment. The group now plans to boost growth through further acquisitions which Thursday’s capital increase will help fund, said people familiar with the plans.

After years of losses in the hundreds of millions, Fincantieri reported a net loss of €53mn in 2023, a significant improvement compared to the previous year’s losses of €324mn. Chief executive Pierroberto Folgiero, who has been at the helm since mid-2022, said the results were “the fruit of financial discipline and solid operational performance of military and civil ship building”.

Shares in Fincantieri closed down 7.5 per cent on Thursday over concerns about the size of the recapitalisation reported earlier on Thursday by Italian media.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

3 children killed in apparent murder-suicide after mom let ex-partner take them to get food, police say

Published

on

3 children killed in apparent murder-suicide after mom let ex-partner take them to get food, police say

Three children, aged 9 to 13, were killed in what police believe is a murder-suicide after their mother agreed to let an ex-partner take them to get something to eat, officials in Georgia said.

A police officer patrolling Lucky Shoals Park in Norcross, about 20 miles northeast of Atlanta, discovered the bodies of three children and an adult male shortly after 1 a.m. Wednesday inside a vehicle parked on a walking trail.

The children were identified by Gwinnett County Police as Arianny Rodriguez, 13, Chadal Rodriguez, 11, and Carlos Rodriguez, 9.

The suspect was identified as Jose Plasencia, 56, who was previously in a relationship with the children’s mother.

Police said the mother was at the hospital because another one of her children had an unrelated injury. Plasencia was the father of the injured child, police said, and had met the mother and children at the hospital.

Advertisement

“After some time the mother agreed to let the three children go with the suspect to grab a bite to eat while she remained at the hospital,” police said in a statement on Facebook.

Gwinnett County Police Sgt. Michele Pihera called the incident a tragedy.

“Our officers are going to step aside and … do the job to the fullest and make sure that they investigate this as if it were any other homicide. And try to, at least, bring some conclusion to the families who may be involved,” Pihera told NBC affiliate WXIA-TV of Atlanta.

Continue Reading

News

The Major Supreme Court Cases of 2024

Published

on

The Major Supreme Court Cases of 2024

No Supreme Court term in recent memory has featured so many cases with the potential to transform American society.

The consequential cases, with decisions arriving by late June or early July, include three affecting former President Donald J. Trump, two on abortion, two on guns, three on the First Amendment rights of social media companies and three on the administrative state.

In recent years, some of the court’s biggest decisions have been out of step with public opinion. Researchers at Harvard, Stanford and the University of Texas conducted a survey in March to help explore whether that gap persists.

Trump’s Ballot Eligibility

Conservative bloc

Advertisement

Roberts

Kavanaugh

Kavanaugh

Barrett

Barrett

Gorsuch

Gorsuch

Alito

Alito

Thomas

Thomas

The Supreme Court ruled that states may not bar former President Donald J. Trump from running for another term, rejecting a challenge from Colorado under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which prohibits insurrectionists from holding office.

Is there a major precedent involved?

No. The Supreme Court had never before considered the scope of Section 3. The unsigned majority opinion relied in part on an 1869 decision from Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase. But that was, a dissent from the court’s three liberal members said, “a nonprecedential, lower court opinion by a single justice in his capacity as a circuit judge.”
Advertisement

Are there recent rulings on the subject?

No. The Colorado Supreme Court’s decision in December disqualifying Mr. Trump from the state’s primary ballot acknowledged that “we travel in uncharted territory.”

A decision that Mr. Trump was ineligible to hold office would have been a political earthquake altering the course of American history.

Where does the public stand?

Advertisement
Think Trump is eligible to run in 2024 Think Trump is not eligible

53%47%

Immunity for Former Presidents

The Supreme Court will decide whether former President Donald J. Trump is immune from prosecution on charges that he plotted to subvert the 2020 election.

Is there a major precedent involved?

There are at least two. In 1974, in United States v. Nixon, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that President Richard M. Nixon, then still in office, had to comply with a subpoena seeking tapes of his conversations, rejecting his claims of executive privilege.

But in 1982, in Nixon v. Fitzgerald, a closely divided court ruled that Nixon, by then out of office, was absolutely immune from civil lawsuits “for acts within the ‘outer perimeter’ of his official responsibility.”

Advertisement

Are there recent rulings on the subject?

In 2020, the Supreme Court ruled by a 7-to-2 vote in Trump v. Vance that Mr. Trump had no absolute right to block the release of his financial records in a criminal investigation. “No citizen, not even the president, is categorically above the common duty to produce evidence when called upon in a criminal proceeding,” Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote for the majority.

The court’s decision will determine whether and when Mr. Trump will face trial for his attempts to overturn his 2020 loss at the polls.

Where does the public stand?

Advertisement
Think former presidents are not immune from criminal prosecution for actions they took while president Think former presidents are immune

74%27%

Obstruction Charges for Jan. 6 Assault

The Supreme Court will decide whether prosecutors may use a federal obstruction statute to charge rioters involved in the Capitol attack on Jan. 6, 2021.

Is there a major precedent involved?

In a series of decisions, the court has narrowed the reach of federal criminal laws aimed at public corruption and white-collar crime.

Advertisement

Are there recent rulings on the subject?

In 2015, the Supreme Court limited the sweep of the statute at issue in the case, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, writing for four of the justices in the majority, warned against cutting the law “loose from its financial-fraud mooring” in a case that involved a Florida fisherman who had thrown undersized fish into the Gulf of Mexico.

The case has the potential to knock out half of the federal charges against former President Donald J. Trump for plotting to subvert the 2020 election and could complicate hundreds of Jan. 6 prosecutions.

Where does the public stand?

Advertisement
Think the events at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, were criminal Think the events were not criminal

71%29%

Abortion Pills

Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

The Supreme Court will decide whether to overturn recent F.D.A. guidelines for distributing a commonly used abortion pill by mail and telemedicine.

Is there a major precedent involved?

Are there recent rulings on the subject?

Advertisement
In 2023, the Supreme Court temporarily blocked efforts to severely curb access to the pill, mifepristone, as an appeal moved forward. Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr. publicly noted that they would have allowed steps seeking to limit the availability of the pill, and Justice Alito wrote a dissent.

The case will determine whether access to the drug, which is used in the majority of abortions in the United States, will be sharply curtailed.

Where does the public stand?

Think the F.D.A.’s approval of mifepristone should not be revoked Think the approval should be revoked

68%33%

Emergency Abortion Care

Advertisement

The Supreme Court will decide whether a federal law that requires emergency rooms to provide stabilizing care to all patients overrides a state law, in Idaho, that imposes a near-total ban on abortion.

Is there a major precedent involved?

The case is another reminder that the court has not been able to leave the question of abortion to states, as it promised in overturning Roe v. Wade after nearly half a century.

Are there recent rulings on the subject?

Advertisement
There are several court battles about various aspects of state abortion bans, including a fight in Texas over the federal law at issue in the case, the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act.

It is the first time the Supreme Court is considering a state law criminalizing abortion since it overturned Roe v. Wade. The decision may affect more than a dozen states that have passed near-total bans on abortion.

Where does the public stand?

Think Idaho hospitals must provide abortions in medical emergencies Think they are not allowed

82%18%

Second Amendment Rights of Domestic Abusers

Advertisement
The Supreme Court will decide whether a federal law that makes it a crime for people subject to domestic violence restraining orders to own guns violates the Second Amendment.

Is there a major precedent involved?

Yes. In 2022, in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, the court struck down a New York law that put strict limits on carrying guns outside the home. The decision established a new legal standard, one that required judges to assess restrictions on gun rights by turning to early American history as a guide.

Are there recent rulings on the subject?

Lower courts have struck down federal laws prohibiting people who have been convicted of felonies or who use drugs from owning guns.

Advertisement

The court may start to clear up the confusion it created in the Bruen decision, in the first major test of its expansion of gun rights. The standard it announced has left lower courts in turmoil as they struggle to hunt down references to obscure or since-forgotten regulations.

Where does the public stand?

Think barring domestic abusers from possessing firearms does not violate their Second Amendment rights Think it violates their rights

74%26%

Restrictions on the Homeless

Advertisement

City of Grants Pass v. Johnson

The Supreme Court will decide whether ordinances in Oregon aimed at preventing homeless people from sleeping and camping outside violate the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.

Is there a major precedent involved?

Yes. The argument by the homeless plaintiffs rests heavily on a 1962 decision, Robinson v. California, in which the Supreme Court ruled that laws criminalizing a person for being addicted to narcotics violated the Eighth Amendment. The plaintiffs argue that homelessness, like drug addiction, is a state of being that cannot be punished.
Advertisement

Are there recent rulings on the subject?

In 2018, an appeals court ruled in Martin v. Boise that Boise, Idaho, had infringed on the constitutional rights of homeless people by making it a crime to sleep outside, even when they had nowhere else to go.

The case could have major ramifications on how far cities across the country can go to clear homeless people from streets and other public spaces.

Where does the public stand?

Advertisement
Think banning homeless people from camping outside even when local shelters are full violates the Constitution Think it does not violate the Constitution

58%42%

Social Media Platforms’ First Amendment Rights

Moody v. NetChoice; NetChoice v. Paxton

The Supreme Court will decide whether Florida and Texas may prohibit large social media companies from removing posts based on the views they express.

The laws’ supporters argue that the measures are needed to combat perceived censorship of conservative views on issues like the coronavirus pandemic and claims of election fraud. Critics of the laws say the First Amendment prevents the government from telling private companies whether and how to disseminate speech.

Is there a major precedent involved?

Advertisement
There are at least two. In 1974, in Miami Herald v. Tornillo, the Supreme Court struck down a Florida law that would have allowed politicians a “right to reply” to newspaper articles critical of them.

In 1980, in Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins, the court said a state constitutional provision that required private shopping centers to allow expressive activities on their property did not violate the centers’ First Amendment rights.

Are there recent rulings on the subject?

In 2022, in the Texas case, the Supreme Court temporarily blocked that state’s law while the appeal moved forward. The vote was 5 to 4, with an unusual coalition in dissent.

The cases arrive garbed in politics, as they concern laws aimed at protecting conservative speech. But the larger question the cases present transcends ideology. It is whether tech platforms have free speech rights to make editorial judgments.

Advertisement

Where does the public stand?

Think states cannot prevent social media companies from censoring speech Think states should be able to prevent censoring

60%41%

Disinformation on Social Media

The Supreme Court will decide whether the Biden administration’s contacts with social media platforms to combat what the officials say is misinformation amounted to censorship of constitutionally protected speech.

Is there a major precedent involved?

Advertisement
Yes. In Bantam Books v. Sullivan in 1963, the Supreme Court ruled that informal and indirect efforts by the government to suppress speech can violate the First Amendment.

Are there recent rulings on the subject?

The Supreme Court is also considering a case that raises similar issues, National Rifle Association v. Vullo, about whether a state official in New York violated the First Amendment by encouraging companies to stop doing business with the National Rifle Association.

The case is a major test of the role of the First Amendment in the internet era, requiring the court to consider when government efforts to limit the spread of misinformation amount to censorship of constitutionally protected speech.

Advertisement

Where does the public stand?

Think federal officials urging private companies to block or remove users violates the First Amendment Think it does not violate the First Amendment

62%38%

N.R.A. and the First Amendment

National Rifle Association of America v. Vullo

The Supreme Court will decide whether a New York State official violated the First Amendment by trying to persuade companies not to do business with the National Rifle Association after the school shooting in Parkland, Fla.

Advertisement

Is there a major precedent involved?

As in Murthy v. Missouri, the case implicates the 1963 decision Bantam Books v. Sullivan, in which the Supreme Court ruled that informal and indirect efforts by the government to suppress speech can violate the First Amendment.

Are there recent rulings on the subject?

The case is one of two that will determine when government advocacy edges into violating free speech rights. The other, Murthy v. Missouri, concerns the Biden administration’s dealings with social media companies.

Advertisement

The case centers on when persuasion by government officials crosses into coercion.

Where does the public stand?

Think the state regulator’s behavior violates the N.R.A.’s First Amendment rights Think it does not violate the N.R.A.’s rights

53%47%

Opioids Settlement

Advertisement

Harrington v. Purdue Pharma

The Supreme Court will decide on the legality of a bankruptcy settlement with Purdue Pharma, the maker of the prescription painkiller OxyContin. In exchange for billions of dollars to battle the opioid epidemic, the deal shields members of the family behind the company, the Sacklers, from civil liability.

Is there a major precedent involved?

The case is the first time the Supreme Court will address whether a bankruptcy plan can be structured to give civil legal immunity to a third party, without the consent of all potential claimholders. The legal maneuver under scrutiny has become increasingly popular in bankruptcy settlements.

Advertisement

Are there recent rulings on the subject?

Approving the deal would funnel money toward states and others who have waited for years for some kind of settlement. Yet the Sacklers would be largely absolved from future opioid-related claims. More broadly, the case may have implications for similar agreements insulating a third party from liability.

Where does the public stand?

Think the Sackler family should not keep immunity from future lawsuits Think family should keep immunity

74%27%

Racial Gerrymandering

Advertisement

Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the N.A.A.C.P.

The justices will decide whether to reinstate a South Carolina voting map that a three-judge court had ruled was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. The parties had asked the Supreme Court to rule by Jan. 1, but its delay in resolving the case ensured that the 2024 election would take place under the rejected map.

Is there a major precedent involved?

Yes. A series of Supreme Court decisions say that making race the predominant factor in drawing voting districts violates the Constitution.

Advertisement

Are there recent rulings on the subject?

The case is superficially similar to one from Alabama in which the court ruled last year that state lawmakers had diluted the power of Black voters in drawing a congressional voting map. But the two cases involve distinct legal principles.

The Alabama case was governed by the Voting Rights Act, the landmark civil rights statute, and the one from South Carolina by the Constitution’s equal protection clause.

The case concerns a constitutional puzzle: how to distinguish the roles of race and partisanship in drawing voting maps when Black voters overwhelmingly favor Democrats. The difference matters because the Supreme Court has said that only racial gerrymandering may be challenged in federal court under the Constitution.

Advertisement

Where does the public stand?

Think these changes to the districts are unconstitutional Think they are constitutional

67%33%

Power of Federal Agencies

Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo; Relentless v. Department of Commerce

The court will decide whether to overrule a foundational 1984 precedent on the power of government agencies, Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council. It said that courts must defer to agencies’ reasonable interpretations of ambiguous statutes.

Is there a major precedent involved?

Advertisement

Yes. Chevron is one of the most cited cases in American law.

Are there recent rulings on the subject?

Chevron has fallen out of favor at the Supreme Court in recent years, and several justices have criticized it. The court, which had invoked Chevron at least 70 times to decide cases, has not done so since 2016.

“The question is less whether this court should overrule Chevron,” Paul D. Clement, one of the lawyers for the challengers, told the justices, “and more whether it should let lower courts and citizens in on the news.”

Advertisement

Overturning the decision could threaten regulations on the environment, health care, consumer safety, nuclear energy, government benefit programs and guns. It would also shift power from agencies to Congress and to judges.

Where does the public stand?

Courts should defer to administrative agencies when laws are unclear Courts should not defer to agencies

51%49%

Agency Funding

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America

Advertisement
The court will decide whether the way Congress funds a consumer watchdog violates the appropriations clause of the Constitution.

Is there a major precedent involved?

There is no precedent squarely on point.

Are there recent rulings on the subject?

Advertisement
In 2020, the Supreme Court ruled that a different part of the law creating the consumer bureau was unconstitutional, saying that Congress could not insulate the bureau’s director from presidential oversight.

A ruling against the bureau, created as part of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act after the financial crisis, could cast doubt on every regulation and enforcement action it took in the dozen years of its existence. That includes agency rules — and punishments against companies that flout them — involving mortgages, credit cards, consumer loans and banking.

Where does the public stand?

Think this agency funding structure is unconstitutional Think it is constitutional

55%45%

Administrative Courts

Advertisement

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy

The Supreme Court will decide whether the Securities and Exchange Commission’s in-house administrative courts are lawful.

Is there a major precedent involved?

Are there recent rulings on the subject?

A ruling against the S.E.C. would not only require it to file cases in federal court but could also imperil administrative tribunals at many other agencies, including the Federal Trade Commission, the Internal Revenue Service, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Social Security Administration and the National Labor Relations Board.

Advertisement

Where does the public stand?

Think federal agencies bringing actions in administrative proceedings rather than in federal courts is not constitutional Think it is constitutional

68%32%

Cross-State Air Pollution

Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency

The Supreme Court will decide whether to temporarily stop the Biden administration’s “good neighbor” plan, which requires factories and power plants in Western and Midwestern states to cut air pollution that drifts into Eastern states.
Advertisement

Is there a major precedent involved?

Are there recent rulings on the subject?

Prevailing winds carry emissions of nitrogen oxide toward Eastern states with fewer industrial sites. The pollutant causes smog and is linked to asthma, lung disease and premature death.

Bump Stocks for Guns

Advertisement
The Supreme Court will decide whether the Trump administration overstepped its bounds by enacting a ban on bump stocks, gun attachments that increase a semiautomatic weapon’s rate of fire to hundreds of bullets per minute.

Is there a major precedent involved?

At first glance, the case looks as if it could be a Second Amendment challenge. But it is instead one of a number of cases aimed at curtailing the power of administrative agencies, in this instance, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

Are there recent rulings on the subject?

The case involves how to interpret a federal law that banned machine guns, the National Firearms Act of 1934. The definition was broadened by the Gun Control Act of 1968 to include parts that can be used to convert a weapon into a machine gun. At issue is whether bump stocks fall within those definitions. Federal appeals courts have split on the issue.

Advertisement

A decision could do away with one of the few efforts at gun control that gained political traction after the Las Vegas massacre in 2017. More broadly, a ruling could help clarify the scope of the power of federal agencies.

Continue Reading

Trending