Connect with us

News

In charts: how India has changed under Narendra Modi

Published

on

In charts: how India has changed under Narendra Modi

In last year’s Independence Day speech at the Red Fort in Delhi, Narendra Modi made a bold pledge: India would become a developed economy by 2047, when it celebrates 100 years since its founding. The country had three things in its favour, the prime minister declared: “demography, democracy and diversity”.

The vow would have seemed implausible a decade ago. In 2013, the year before Modi took power, India was identified by Morgan Stanley among a group of vulnerable emerging-market economies, dubbed the “Fragile Five” for their reliance on foreign capital to fuel their economies and, in many cases, big current account deficits.

Ten years later, Modi’s India is firmly in the sights of international investors, consultants and trading partners as one of the world’s fastest-growing big economies and a critical “China plus one” destination for companies seeking to reduce their exposure to political currents in Beijing.

In India’s upcoming national election, expected between April and May, Modi will make much of his Bharatiya Janata party’s economic record during its 10 years in government, touting its successes in delivering growth, reducing poverty and building infrastructure including airports, railways and roads.

But what do the numbers show?

Advertisement

The Financial Times has analysed official data for gross domestic product growth, unemployment and poverty reduction, as well as indicators tracking job creation and employment, examining how they have performed in absolute terms and comparatively against other countries in some cases.

India’s statistics are in many cases deficient — the country has not held a census since 2011, for example — or in dispute, as in the case of unemployment data, but the numbers point to some clear trends.

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

During Modi’s two terms in office, India has on average been one of the fastest-growing large economies. Between 2014 and 2022, GDP grew at an average of 5.6 per cent in compound annual growth rate terms. An average of 14 other large developing economies had a CAGR of 3.8 per cent over the same period.

But India’s growth rate was even higher from 2000 to 2010, at more than 6 per cent on average. Economists said India’s economy would need to grow faster than its current 6-7 per cent rate in order to absorb a growing number of entrants into the workforce and meet Modi’s goal of reaching developed country status by 2047.

Advertisement

India is the poorest among the Brics nations, said Raghuram Rajan, professor of finance at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business and a former Reserve Bank of India governor, referring to the grouping that also includes Brazil, Russia, China and South Africa. It also “has a much longer distance of travel before it reaches their level of per capita income”, he said. “Growth has been good, but it has to be set in perspective.”

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Extreme poverty has continued to fall since Modi took power. The share of India’s population living in extreme poverty has fallen from 18.7 per cent in 2015 to 12 per cent in 2021, according to World Bank data. Urban and rural regions both registered a drop in the share of people living below the international poverty line of $2.15 a day.

These gains are partly thanks to generous social transfers to the poorest under Modi’s government. In November, India extended one of the biggest such schemes, launched during the Covid-19 pandemic, under which more than 813mn people, or more than half of the population, benefit from free food grains for another five years.

“The emphasis of this government has been on efficient delivery of a lot of welfare schemes,” said Krishnamurthy Subramanian, executive director at the IMF and a former chief economic adviser to the Modi government.

Its use of technology, including the creation of more than 500mn bank accounts for the poor, linked with biometric identification via India’s digital ID system Aadhaar, has “helped direct welfare transfers precisely to the beneficiaries and eliminate pilferage to middlemen”, he added.

Advertisement

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Rapid economic growth has opened the door to the middle class for tens — by some measures hundreds — of millions of Indians over the past decade.

According to data from household surveys conducted by People Research on India’s Consumer Economy, an Udaipur-based non-profit think-tank, the middle class — comprising people with annual family income of Rs500,000-Rs3mn ($6,700-$40,000 at 2020-21 prices) — has been among the fastest-growing income groups since Modi took power in 2014.

“The top income segment — the rich — has soared from 30mn to 90mn, while 520mn are middle class currently, up from 300mn in 2014,” said Rajesh Shukla, the think-tank’s managing director and chief executive.

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Since Modi took power, his government has taken steps to improve public health and hygiene, including a nationwide campaign to build public toilets. Infant mortality has also fallen steadily, though the improvement predates Modi’s time in office. As of 2020, India’s infant mortality rate was lower than South Africa’s.

While the Modi government has presided over a period of mostly high growth, the economy has failed to create enough jobs. Unemployment — which has especially hit the country’s youth, the world’s largest population of young people — figured prominently in hard-fought state elections in 2023 and will be a point of attack for Modi’s opponents in this year’s election for the lower house of parliament.

Advertisement

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

The jobless rate has barely budged during Modi’s time in office and exceeded 10 per cent in October for the first time since the pandemic, according to the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy, which produces India’s most-cited unemployment figures. Among young people aged 15-34, the CMIE figures are even worse: unemployment in that group stood at 45.4 per cent in 2023.

Some economists — as well as the Modi government itself — say the CMIE data is inadequate and prefer to cite unemployment figures gathered by India’s statistics ministry in its Periodic Labour Force Survey, which show a decline in jobless rates.

But in a country where millions work in menial or low-quality jobs, other analysts say India’s unemployment numbers cannot be trusted at all. Ashoka Mody, visiting professor of international economic policy at Princeton University and author of the scathing economic history India Is Broken, calls the official unemployment numbers “a meaningless statistic in the Indian context”, arguing that it hides a bigger problem of underemployment.

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Women account for a smaller percentage of the labour force than when Modi took power in 2014. India’s female labour force participation rate fell from 25 per cent in 2014 to 24 per cent in 2022, lower than regional neighbours Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Pakistan.

Economists have said getting more women into work would boost India’s growth — by up to 1.5 per cent, according to one World Bank estimate — but safety issues and social pressure prevent many from doing so.

Advertisement

“One problem is the availability of jobs, and the availability of jobs where women feel safe outside the home,” said Swati Narayan, associate professor at OP Jindal Global University and author of Unequal, a book about why India lags behind its south Asian neighbours in social and economic development. “In India, there are a lot of taboos about women going outside to work.”

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Spending on roads, railways and other infrastructure has surged under Modi and has been an engine of economic growth. India plans to spend Rs5tn, or 1.7 per cent of GDP, on capital expenditure for building roads and railways, up from 0.4 per cent of GDP in 2014, according to calculations based on the FT’s analysis of Union Budget data.

Data compiled by CMIE also point to a construction boom since Modi took office, with India adding more than 10,000km of roads each year since 2018.

“This is something that this government has done very well — lots of road and rail network construction,” said Rajan at the University of Chicago.

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Advertisement

India has boasted of its success in bringing nearly 1bn people online, promoting its public digital infrastructure as a model for other developing countries.

The Aadhaar system of digital IDs began under Modi’s predecessors in a Congress-led government but has been brought to life during his tenure and parlayed into a full-fledged digital payments ecosystem, dubbed the India Stack. 

The drive to bring more Indians online was supported by a proliferation of cheap, mostly made-in-India smartphones, which more than 60 per cent of Indians now carry. According to India’s government, the value of digital transactions has grown 70 per cent over the past five years, from Rs1,962tn in the 2017-18 fiscal year to Rs3,355tn in 2022-23.

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

India prides itself on its globally connected information technology sector, with a host of domestic and foreign companies clustered in southern India, especially around Bengaluru and Hyderabad, making the country the “back office of the world”.

But India is falling short on research and development spending. Its share of the economy has dropped under Modi to less than 0.7 per cent of GDP, a lower rate than that of any other Brics country and far below the roughly 5 per cent of GDP spent by some of the world’s biggest R&D centres, led by South Korea and Israel.

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Advertisement

While many economic indicators have improved, democracy watchdog groups have downgraded India’s rankings on basic freedoms over the past 10 years.

The BBC’s India head office and Indian news website NewsClick were raided in 2023, and journalists from other organisations have faced criminal charges or jail time in what watchdog groups describe as a crackdown on free expression.

India’s press freedom ranking according to Reporters Without Borders (RSF) dropped to 161 in 2023, down from 140 in 2014 and only three places higher than Russia, which unlike India cannot credibly claim to be a democracy.

Defenders of the Modi government’s record have questioned the reliability of rankings on human rights and civil liberties compiled by RSF, Freedom House and other groups, while some Indian civil society groups have argued that a free press — including an independent business press — is crucial not just to protecting Indian democracy but its economy, too.

“The reason you move to ‘China plus one’ is because of the undemocratic and opaque power structure in China,” said Yamini Aiyar, chief executive of the Centre for Policy Research think-tank. “If India loses this piece, it will have huge repercussions in the long run.”

Advertisement

News

Video: Man on Roof Faces Off with ICE Agents for Hours in Minnesota

Published

on

Video: Man on Roof Faces Off with ICE Agents for Hours in Minnesota

new video loaded: Man on Roof Faces Off with ICE Agents for Hours in Minnesota

transcript

transcript

Man on Roof Faces Off with ICE Agents for Hours in Minnesota

A man clung to a partially built roof for hours in frigid temperatures during a standoff with immigration agents in Chanhassen, Minn., a suburb of Minneapolis. The confrontation was part of the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown in the state to remove what it calls “vicious criminals.”

“What a [expletive] embarrassment.” “Look at this guy.” “What’s with all the fascists?” “The Lord is with you.” “Where’s the bad hombre? What did this guy do?” “He’s out here working to support his [expletive] family.” “Gestapo agents.” “Oh yeah, shake your head, tough guy.” “This is where you get the worst of the worst right here, hard-working builders.” “Crossing the border is not a crime. Coming illegally to the United States is not a crime, according to you.” “C’mon, get out of here.” “Take him to a different hospital.”

Advertisement
A man clung to a partially built roof for hours in frigid temperatures during a standoff with immigration agents in Chanhassen, Minn., a suburb of Minneapolis. The confrontation was part of the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown in the state to remove what it calls “vicious criminals.”

By Ernesto Londoño, Jackeline Luna and Daniel Fetherston

December 17, 2025

Continue Reading

News

Trump’s BBC lawsuit: A botched report, BritBox, and porn

Published

on

Trump’s BBC lawsuit: A botched report, BritBox, and porn

Journalists report outside BBC Broadcasting House in London. In a new lawsuit, President Trump is seeking $10 billion from the BBC for defamation.

Kirsty Wigglesworth/AP/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Kirsty Wigglesworth/AP/AP

Not content with an apology and the resignation of two top BBC executives, President Trump filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit Monday against the BBC in his continued strategy to take the press to court.

Beyond the legal attack on yet another media outlet, the litigation represents an audacious move against a national institution of a trusted ally. It hinges on an edit presented in a documentary of the president’s words on a fateful day. Oddly enough, it also hinges on the appeal of a niche streaming service to people in Florida, and the use of a technological innovation embraced by porn devotees.

A sloppy edit

At the heart of Trump’s case stands an episode of the BBC television documentary program Panorama that compresses comments Trump made to his supporters on Jan. 6, 2021, before they laid siege to the U.S. Capitol.

Advertisement

The episode seamlessly links Trump’s call for people to walk up to the Capitol with his exhortation nearly 55 minutes later: “And we fight, we fight like hell, and if you don’t fight like hell you don’t have a country anymore.”

Trump’s attorneys argue that the presentation gives viewers the impression that the president incited the violence that followed. They said his remarks had been doctored, not edited, and noted the omission of his statement that protesters would be “marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.”

As NPR and other news organizations have documented, many defendants in the Jan. 6 attack on Congress said they believed they had been explicitly urged by Trump to block the certification of President-elect Joe Biden’s victory.

Trump’s lawsuit calls the documentary “a false, defamatory, deceptive, disparaging, inflammatory, and malicious depiction of President Trump.”

The lawsuit alleges that the depiction was “fabricated” and aired “in a brazen attempt to interfere in and influence the Election to President Trump’s detriment.”

Advertisement

While the BBC has not filed a formal response to the lawsuit, the public broadcaster has reiterated that it will defend itself in court.

A Nov. 13 letter to Trump’s legal team on behalf of the BBC from Charles Tobin, a leading U.S. First Amendment attorney, argued that the broadcaster has demonstrated contrition by apologizing, withdrawing the broadcast, and accepting the executives’ resignations.

Tobin also noted, on behalf of the BBC, that Trump had already been indicted by a grand jury on four criminal counts stemming from his efforts to overturn the 2020 election, including his conduct on Jan. 6, 2021, on the Capitol grounds.

The appeal of BritBox

For all the current consternation about the documentary, it didn’t get much attention at the time. The BBC aired the documentary twice on the eve of the 2024 elections — but never broadcast it directly in Florida.

That matters because the lawsuit was filed in Florida, where Trump alleges that the program was intended to discourage voters from voting for him.

Advertisement

Yet Tobin notes, Trump won Florida in 2024 by a “commanding 13-point margin, improving over his 2020 and 2016 performances in the state.”

Trump failed to make the case that Floridians were influenced by the documentary, Tobin wrote. He said the BBC did not broadcast the program in Florida through U.S. channels. (The BBC has distribution deals with PBS and NPR and their member stations for television and radio programs, respectively, but not to air Panorama.)

It was “geographically restricted” to U.K. viewers, Tobin wrote.

Hence the argument in Trump’s lawsuit that American viewers have other ways to watch it. The first is BritBox, a BBC streaming service that draws more on British mysteries set at seaside locales than BBC coverage of American politics.

Back in March, then-BBC Director General Tim Davie testified before the House of Commons that BritBox had more than 4 million subscribers in the U.S. (The BBC did not break down how many subscribers it has in Florida or how often Panorama documentaries are viewed by subscribers in the U.S. or the state, in response to questions posed by NPR for this story.)

Advertisement

“The Panorama Documentary was available to BritBox subscribers in Florida and was in fact viewed by these subscribers through BritBox and other means provided by the BBC,” Trump’s lawsuit states.

NPR searched for Panorama documentaries on the BritBox streaming service through the Amazon Prime platform, one of its primary distributors. The sole available episode dates from 2000. Trump does not mention podcasts. Panorama is streamed on BBC Sounds. Its episodes do not appear to be available in the U.S. on such mainstream podcast distributors in the U.S. such as Apple Podcasts, Spotify or Pocket Casts, according to a review by NPR.

Software that enables anonymous browsing – of porn

Another way Trump’s lawsuit suggests people in the U.S. could watch that particular episode of Panorama, if they were so inclined, is through a Virtual Private Network, or VPN.

Trump’s suit says millions of Florida citizens use VPNs to view content from foreign streamers that would otherwise be restricted. And the BBC iPlayer is among the most popular streaming services accessed by viewers using a VPN, Trump’s lawsuit asserts.

In response to questions from NPR, the BBC declined to break down figures for how many people in the U.S. access the BBC iPlayer through VPNs.

Advertisement

Demand for such software did shoot up in 2024 and early 2025. Yet, according to analysts — and even to materials cited by the president’s team in his own case — the reason appears to have less to do with foreign television shows and more to do with online pornography.

Under a new law, Florida began requiring age verification checks for visitors to pornographic websites, notes Paul Bischoff, editor of Comparitech, a site that reviews personal cybersecurity software.

“People use VPNs to get around those age verification and site blocks,” Bischoff says. “The reason is obvious.”

An article in the Tampa Free Press cited by Trump’s lawsuit to help propel the idea of a sharp growth of interest in the BBC actually undercuts the idea in its very first sentence – by focusing on that law.

“Demand for Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) has skyrocketed in Florida following the implementation of a new law requiring age verification for access to adult websites,” the first paragraph states. “This dramatic increase reflects a widespread effort by Floridians to bypass the restrictions and access adult content.”

Advertisement

Several legal observers anticipate possible settlement

Several First Amendment attorneys tell NPR they believe Trump’s lawsuit will result in a settlement of some kind, in part because there’s new precedent. In the past year, the parent companies of ABC News and CBS News have each paid $16 million to settle cases filed by Trump that many legal observers considered specious.

“The facts benefit Trump and defendants may be concerned about reputational harm,” says Carl Tobias, a professor of law at the University of Richmond who specializes in free speech issues. “The BBC also has admitted it could have done better and essentially apologized.”

Some of Trump’s previous lawsuits against the media have failed. He is currently also suing the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Des Moines Register and its former pollster, and the board of the Pulitzer Prize.

Continue Reading

News

Video: Prosecutors Charge Nick Reiner With Murdering His Parents

Published

on

Video: Prosecutors Charge Nick Reiner With Murdering His Parents

new video loaded: Prosecutors Charge Nick Reiner With Murdering His Parents

transcript

transcript

Prosecutors Charge Nick Reiner With Murdering His Parents

Los Angeles prosecutors charged Nick Reiner with two counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of his parents, the director Rob Reiner and Michele Singer Reiner.

Our office will be filing charges against Nick Reiner, who is accused of killing his parents, actor-director Rob Reiner and photographer-producer Michele Singer Reiner. These charges will be two counts of first-degree murder, with a special circumstance of multiple murders. He also faces a special allegation that he personally used a dangerous and deadly weapon, that being a knife. These charges carry a maximum sentence of life in prison without the possibility parole or the death penalty. No decision at this point has been made with respect to the death penalty.

Advertisement
Los Angeles prosecutors charged Nick Reiner with two counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of his parents, the director Rob Reiner and Michele Singer Reiner.

By Shawn Paik

December 16, 2025

Continue Reading

Trending