Connect with us

News

French parliament votes to oust Michel Barnier’s government

Published

on

French parliament votes to oust Michel Barnier’s government

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

The French parliament on Wednesday voted to oust Prime Minister Michel Barnier over his proposed deficit-cutting budget, plunging the country into deeper political turmoil.

A motion of no confidence was approved by 331 votes in the 577 member national assembly, as Marine Le Pen’s far-right party teamed up with a leftist bloc to bring down Barnier’s minority government.

Barnier’s administration has collapsed without adopting his contentious 2025 budget that included €60bn in tax increases and spending cuts to reduce France’s deficit, which will reach 6 per cent of GDP this year.

Advertisement

President Emmanuel Macron will now have to select another prime minister, a task made difficult by a raucous parliament divided into three blocs, none of which is close to having a governing majority.

Barnier’s three-month term as prime minister was the shortest of any premier since France’s Fifth Republic was founded in 1958. It is only the second time a government has been voted down since then. 

The political tumult gripping France comes just weeks after German Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s coalition collapsed, leaving the EU’s two most powerful states in limbo.

Barnier defended his record as prime minister during a national assembly debate before the confidence vote, telling lawmakers: “I have been and am proud to act to build rather than to destroy.”

He said it was “not for pleasure” that he had presented a difficult budget. France’s fiscal “reality will not disappear by the enchantment of a motion of censure”, he added.

Advertisement

Macron will have to contend with an emboldened Le Pen and her Rassemblement National party, which was decisive in removing Barnier after spurning his last-ditch attempts at a compromise on his budget.

Le Pen said her decision to censure Barnier was prompted by the “necessity to put an end to the chaos, to spare the French people from a dangerous, unfair and punitive budget”.

Macron “is largely responsible for the current situation”, Le Pen told TF1 television shortly after the vote.

When the president appoints a new prime minister, that person would work on a new budget which Rassemblement National “will construct with other forces in the national assembly”, she added.

Mathilde Panot, a leader of the far-left France Unbowed party, slammed Barnier for seeking deals with the Rassemblement National to try to stay in power.

Advertisement

“Barnier tried to escape censure by choosing dishonour, he has gotten dishonour and censure,” she said.

Marie Lebec, a lawmaker from Macron’s centrist alliance and former minister, said her fellow parliamentarians should put aside party squabbling to find a way forward.

The political crisis risks further spooking financial markets. Barnier had previously warned of a financial and economic “storm” should his government fall without adopting the 2025 budget, saying borrowing costs were on track to exceed €60bn next year, more than the French defence budget.

French borrowing costs on its 10-year sovereign bond hit a 12-year high against Germany’s last week, as investors fretted about the likely failure of Barnier’s government.

After the confidence vote on Wednesday, the euro was flat against the dollar at $1.052, reflecting how the result was widely expected.

Advertisement

Barnier may stay on as a caretaker premier for a short time, but it will fall to his successor to craft another 2025 budget, ahead of a year-end deadline.

In the meantime, Macron and parliament have several options to pass emergency measures that would avoid a government shutdown and keep public services funded temporarily.

But unlike previously when he procrastinated on picking premiers, Macron aimed to move quickly this time, said a person familiar with his thinking, and he has drawn up a list of potential candidates to succeed Barnier.

The Elysée said Macron would address the nation on Thursday evening in a televised speech.

Barnier was appointed by Macron in September after the president’s centrist alliance lost snap parliamentary elections, which increased the ranks of the far right and leftist parties.

Advertisement

His departure is a sign of how gridlocked French institutions have become since the elections.

“It feels like a series of impasses in a parliament where no one has a workable majority,” said Bruno Cautrès, political scientist at Sciences Po. “There is a risk that a new government would fall quickly, just as Barnier has done.”

Additional reporting by Ian Smith in London

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Video: How Navy Pilots are Harmed by Their Own Planes

Published

on

Video: How Navy Pilots are Harmed by Their Own Planes

For decades, the Navy has stated that brain injuries have mostly occurred during accidents or leisure activities. But now, a confidential new program is studying whether intense fighter jet operations can cause brain injuries as devastating as those from repeated blast exposure.

Continue Reading

News

Bears are dropping like flies

Published

on

Bears are dropping like flies

Stay informed with free updates

We’ll take $1tn on “things people say at the top of the cycle”, please Alex.

Mega forces are reshaping economies and their long-term trajectories — it’s no longer about short-term fluctuations in activity leading to expansion or recession. 2024 has reinforced our view that we are not in a business cycle: AI has been a major market driver, inflation fell without a growth slowdown and typical recession signals failed. Volatility surged and narratives flipflopped as markets kept viewing new data through a business cycle lens, not one of transformation.

That’s from BlackRock’s 2025 investment outlook, published yesterday. It’s not quite Gordon Brown bragging on the eve of the financial crisis that he’d eliminated boom and bust cycles, but there are uncanny echoes.

However, BlackRock gunna BlackRock. A large investment manager is never going to sound overly negative in its big annual outlook, when the whole point is to entice punters into the building. Or as BlackRock puts it:

Advertisement

This fundamentally different landscape upends the nature of investing, in our view. We think investors can find opportunities by tapping into the waves of transformation we see ahead in the real economy, with AI and the low-carbon transition requiring investment potentially on par with the Industrial Revolution.

What’s more noticeable is how many permabears are now throwing in the towel. Even Nouriel Roubini is sounding remarkably positive these days, and now David Rosenberg is publishing mea culpas (though he insists that this is not what it is).

Check it out:

The bottom line: One can reasonably debate whether the stock market has risen exponentially but there is no arguing that the surge in the S&P 500 these past two years has been nothing short of extraordinary. And it has clearly gone much further than I thought it would, especially in these past twelve months, and so at this point, it is worth the time and effort to discuss and interpret the message from the market; tip the hat to the bulls who have, after all, been on the right side of the trade, and provide some rationale behind this powerful surge. This is not some attempt at a mea culpa or a throwing in of any towel, as much as the lament of a bear who has come to grips with the premise that while the market has definitely been exuberant, it may not actually be altogether that irrational.

Rosenberg’s über-bear credentials have been well-established for several decades. He’s your favourite bearish analyst’s favourite bear. As recently as last month he was recommending people get into cash because he felt pretty much everything was overvalued. So Rosenberg’s shift is . . . interesting.

His whole argument is worth reading, as some of the thoughtful bearishness still lingers. For example, Rosenberg still reckons that there could be a correction sometime soon, perhaps triggered by a more hawkish Federal Reserve. But he thinks that the response will and should probably be to “buy the dip”.

This bit stood out for us, as FTAV never thought we’d hear Rosenberg unironically say anything like “this time is different”:

Advertisement

I do hate to ever use the term “new era” or “it’s different this time,” but we do not have a large sample size of data points historically on such major inflection points on the technology curve. But when they do occur, what you do find is what we have on our hands today, which, once again, is an investment community lengthening their investment horizons and rendering classic valuation metrics obsolete (at least for the environment we find ourselves in currently). That’s the major point.

This is the kind of stuff that mostly happens just before major market turns. Thankfully Albert Edwards is as resolutely gloomy as ever, because if he changes his mind all hell will probably break loose.

Continue Reading

News

Security expert shocked health care CEO didn't have security when he was killed | Fox News Video

Published

on

Security expert shocked health care CEO didn't have security when he was killed | Fox News Video
Klein Investigations CEO Philip Klein joined ‘Fox & Friends First’ to discuss why it was ‘completely unusual’ that UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson didn’t have personal security at the time of the murder as the perpetrator remains on the loose.
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending