Connect with us

News

French parliament votes to oust Michel Barnier’s government

Published

on

French parliament votes to oust Michel Barnier’s government

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

The French parliament on Wednesday voted to oust Prime Minister Michel Barnier over his proposed deficit-cutting budget, plunging the country into deeper political turmoil.

A motion of no confidence was approved by 331 votes in the 577 member national assembly, as Marine Le Pen’s far-right party teamed up with a leftist bloc to bring down Barnier’s minority government.

Barnier’s administration has collapsed without adopting his contentious 2025 budget that included €60bn in tax increases and spending cuts to reduce France’s deficit, which will reach 6 per cent of GDP this year.

Advertisement

President Emmanuel Macron will now have to select another prime minister, a task made difficult by a raucous parliament divided into three blocs, none of which is close to having a governing majority.

Barnier’s three-month term as prime minister was the shortest of any premier since France’s Fifth Republic was founded in 1958. It is only the second time a government has been voted down since then. 

The political tumult gripping France comes just weeks after German Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s coalition collapsed, leaving the EU’s two most powerful states in limbo.

Barnier defended his record as prime minister during a national assembly debate before the confidence vote, telling lawmakers: “I have been and am proud to act to build rather than to destroy.”

He said it was “not for pleasure” that he had presented a difficult budget. France’s fiscal “reality will not disappear by the enchantment of a motion of censure”, he added.

Advertisement

Macron will have to contend with an emboldened Le Pen and her Rassemblement National party, which was decisive in removing Barnier after spurning his last-ditch attempts at a compromise on his budget.

Le Pen said her decision to censure Barnier was prompted by the “necessity to put an end to the chaos, to spare the French people from a dangerous, unfair and punitive budget”.

Macron “is largely responsible for the current situation”, Le Pen told TF1 television shortly after the vote.

When the president appoints a new prime minister, that person would work on a new budget which Rassemblement National “will construct with other forces in the national assembly”, she added.

Mathilde Panot, a leader of the far-left France Unbowed party, slammed Barnier for seeking deals with the Rassemblement National to try to stay in power.

Advertisement

“Barnier tried to escape censure by choosing dishonour, he has gotten dishonour and censure,” she said.

Marie Lebec, a lawmaker from Macron’s centrist alliance and former minister, said her fellow parliamentarians should put aside party squabbling to find a way forward.

The political crisis risks further spooking financial markets. Barnier had previously warned of a financial and economic “storm” should his government fall without adopting the 2025 budget, saying borrowing costs were on track to exceed €60bn next year, more than the French defence budget.

French borrowing costs on its 10-year sovereign bond hit a 12-year high against Germany’s last week, as investors fretted about the likely failure of Barnier’s government.

After the confidence vote on Wednesday, the euro was flat against the dollar at $1.052, reflecting how the result was widely expected.

Advertisement

Barnier may stay on as a caretaker premier for a short time, but it will fall to his successor to craft another 2025 budget, ahead of a year-end deadline.

In the meantime, Macron and parliament have several options to pass emergency measures that would avoid a government shutdown and keep public services funded temporarily.

But unlike previously when he procrastinated on picking premiers, Macron aimed to move quickly this time, said a person familiar with his thinking, and he has drawn up a list of potential candidates to succeed Barnier.

The Elysée said Macron would address the nation on Thursday evening in a televised speech.

Barnier was appointed by Macron in September after the president’s centrist alliance lost snap parliamentary elections, which increased the ranks of the far right and leftist parties.

Advertisement

His departure is a sign of how gridlocked French institutions have become since the elections.

“It feels like a series of impasses in a parliament where no one has a workable majority,” said Bruno Cautrès, political scientist at Sciences Po. “There is a risk that a new government would fall quickly, just as Barnier has done.”

Additional reporting by Ian Smith in London

News

Map: 7.0-Magnitude Earthquake Shakes Northern California

Published

on

Map: 7.0-Magnitude Earthquake Shakes Northern California

Note: Map shows the area with a shake intensity of 3 or greater, which U.S.G.S. defines as “weak,” though the earthquake may be felt outside the areas shown. The New York Times

A major, 7.0-magnitude earthquake struck in the North Pacific Ocean on Thursday, according to the United States Geological Survey.

The temblor happened at 10:44 a.m. Pacific time about 40 miles southwest of Ferndale, Calif., data from the agency shows.

U.S.G.S. data earlier reported that the magnitude was 6.6.

As seismologists review available data, they may revise the earthquake’s reported magnitude. Additional information collected about the earthquake may also prompt U.S.G.S. scientists to update the shake-severity map.

Advertisement

Aftershocks in the region

An aftershock is usually a smaller earthquake that follows a larger one in the same general area. Aftershocks are typically minor adjustments along the portion of a fault that slipped at the time of the initial earthquake.

Quakes and aftershocks within 100 miles

Aftershocks can occur days, weeks or even years after the first earthquake. These events can be of equal or larger magnitude to the initial earthquake, and they can continue to affect already damaged locations.

Advertisement

Source: United States Geological Survey | Notes: Shaking categories are based on the Modified Mercalli Intensity scale. When aftershock data is available, the corresponding maps and charts include earthquakes within 100 miles and seven days of the initial quake. All times above are Pacific time. Shake data is as of Thursday, Dec. 5 at 10:55 a.m. Pacific time. Aftershocks data is as of Thursday, Dec. 5 at 2:14 p.m. Pacific time.

Continue Reading

News

New ‘anti-woke’ ETF makes Starbucks its first target

Published

on

New ‘anti-woke’ ETF makes Starbucks its first target

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

A new fund aiming to punish “woke” companies will make Starbucks its first target, as politically motivated investors move to capitalise on Donald Trump’s election.

The actively managed fund, which Azoria Partners expects to launch early next year, will exclude S&P 500 companies that incorporate diversity, equity and inclusion considerations into their hiring processes.

The fund unveiled its Starbucks plan on Thursday at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida.

Advertisement

The event was due to be attended by Cathie Wood and Kevin Roberts, the ideologue behind the Project 2025 blueprint for Trump’s government, according to an invitation seen by the FT. Wood and Roberts did not respond to requests for comment.

“Americans, whether they voted for president Trump or not, do not want to invest in companies running woke science experiments,” said James Fishback, one of Azoria’s founders, in an interview, referring to hiring practices that factor in diversity. “We are representing shareholders here, and human capital hiring quotas — that hurts all shareholders.”

The coffee chain, with a market capitalisation of about $110bn, denied in a statement to the Financial Times that it had “targets or quotas at any stage of the hiring process”. The chain said that policies cited by Azoria — which included reaching racial and ethnic diversity of at least 30 per cent among corporate employees — were aspirations not quotas, and that they recently expired and were not reinstated.

The new fund is the latest attempt by Trump-supporting investors to push back against DEI and environmental, social and governance initiatives by big US companies — and to profit from the coming change in government in Washington.

Shares in Starbucks, which has around 40,000 coffee shops globally, have lagged behind the broader market this year but have risen since August on hopes that newly appointed chief executive Brian Niccol would turn its struggling business around.

Advertisement

The new “anti-woke” fund, created by Fishback and his Azoria co-founder Asaf Abramovich, has a list of about three dozen other companies it will exclude from the roster, unless they scrap their DEI policies.

Roberts, president of the Heritage Foundation think-tank, and Wood, founder of Ark Investment Management, were both scheduled to address the event at Trump’s resort on Thursday.

Fishback’s fund does not manage any money yet, meaning the Starbucks campaign lacks the financial heft to influence the retailer’s decisions. Powerful activist fund Elliott Management recently built a large stake in the chain, helping to spur replacement of its CEO earlier this year.

Unlike an activist hedge fund, which buys stakes in companies to agitate for change, Azoria will push its agenda by excluding companies from their index and publicly claim DEI policies are hurting their stock price.

The strategy borrows from so-called environmental, social and governance funds, which excluded investments in polluting industries and were attacked by many conservatives.

Advertisement

Azoria’s new ETF is set to launch early next year under the ticker SPXM, which stands for S&P Meritocracy. In remarks at the Mar-a-Lago event, Fishback will claim the stocks of S&P 500 companies that factor diversity into hiring have underperformed their rivals.

Some research has contradicted that, including a McKinsey report last year that found companies in the top quartile of racial diversity were 39 per cent more likely to perform better than those in the bottom quartile.

Fishback, who previously worked at hedge fund Greenlight Capital and is mired in a legal dispute with its founder David Einhorn, is among Wall Street investors aiming to cash in on a conservative shift as Trump returns to the White House.

Other politically driven investors have punched far above their weight. The activist investor Engine No. 1 secured three board seats in 2021 at ExxonMobil by mounting a campaign against the oil major while only overseeing $240mn worth of assets.

Fishback argued hiring on ethnic and racial diversity grounds was a political act that would hurt shareholders.

Advertisement

He said: “Cut that crap out. Hire the best and brightest. Don’t apologise for it, make money, give it to shareholders, and do the right thing.”

Additional reporting by Gregory Meyer and Antoine Gara in New York

Continue Reading

News

UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson’s suspected shooter used fake NJ ID to check into hostel: sources

Published

on

UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson’s suspected shooter used fake NJ ID to check into hostel: sources

The suspected gunman who shot and killed UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson had checked into an Upper West Side hostel using a fake New Jersey ID, law enforcement sources told The Post. 

The suspect in insurance CEO Brian Thompson’s murder used a fake ID to check into a youth hostel, law enforcement sources said. DCPI
Authorities said they found the ID the suspect used to book a room at the HI New York City Hostel at 891 Amsterdam Ave. in Manhattan. James Keivom
The probe revealed, however, that the suspect used a fake ID. Obtained by NY Post

Authorities said they investigated the ID the suspect used to book a space at the HI New York City Hostel, at 891 Amsterdam Ave. in Manhattan, where the gunman was pictured before the shooting.  

The probe, however, revealed the ID was fake.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending