Connect with us

News

Dramatic late Havertz winner steals win for Chelsea amid Abramovich turmoil

Published

on

Kai Havertz scored a elegant winner moments from time to steal a 1-0 victory towards a valiant Newcastle United facet on the Blues’ first recreation at Stamford Bridge since proprietor Roman Abramovich — who had been trying to promote the membership — was sanctioned by the UK authorities.

The Russian oligarch’s sanctioning held quite a few large implications for Chelsea, which was allowed to proceed enjoying below a particular license however unable to purchase or promote gamers, challenge new contracts to current gamers, promote new tickets to approaching video games or promote any membership merchandise.

As rumors proceed to swirl of potential new house owners, uncertainty reigns with supporters arriving at Stamford Bridge below essentially the most uncommon of pre-match circumstances.

Abramovich stays a determine of gratitude for a lot of supporters on the membership — his possession overseeing an unprecedented period of success, together with two UEFA Champions League titles — together with his title chanted by followers in the course of the group’s earlier two away league matches.

On a stand in a single nook of the bottom, a banner that includes Abramovich’s face on the Russian flag with the phrases, “The Roman Empire,” remained seen all through the match.

Nevertheless, a show which had been deliberate for Abramovich by supporters group We Are the Shed didn’t go forward.

One of many group’s founders, Richard Weekes, had advised CNN final week that they had been planning a show to be proven earlier than kick-off, however forward of the sport, the group stated they’d be pausing any such plans whereas circumstances are “always altering.”

“In the meanwhile we’re holding off with any sort of shows for the reason that present state of affairs is continually altering,” the tweet read.
Roman Abramovich: Death and destruction in Ukraine overshadows Russian oligarch's legacy at Chelsea

Forward of kick-off, Chelsea technical efficiency advisor Petr Cech stated that the membership was taking it “daily.”

“We hope the state of affairs might be clearer quickly,” Cech, former goalkeeper with the membership, advised Sky Sports activities.

Advertisement

“We hope folks working for the membership will be capable to get their salaries. It is a day-to-day state of affairs … with out solutions, it’s troublesome to plan.

“We go daily and we hope the brand new proprietor will come and wish to proceed the legacy on the pitch as a result of we’re a group that desires to win and do our greatest,” Cech added.

Graffiti is seen on boarding at a construction site next to Chelsea Football Club at Stamford Bridge on March 11.

‘I am going to persist with the soccer’

The tumultuous context across the membership’s possession was made all of the extra intriguing by the circumstances of the opposition, Newcastle United, who in October had been taken over by a Saudi-Arabian backed consortium.

The three-party consortium contains the Saudi Arabian Public Funding Fund (PIF), a sovereign wealth fund chaired by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

Its involvement within the takeover of Newcastle has been a long-running saga in English soccer, throughout which era Saudi Arabia’s human rights document — together with the homicide of journalist Jamal Khashoggi — has come below scrutiny.

Their club became the richest in the world. But these fans are worried at what it means for Newcastle's soul
Saudi Arabia executed 81 males on Saturday, authorities stated, within the greatest mass execution in many years, in line with Reuters.

A Saudi Arabia flag — in addition to a Ukrainian flag — was seen within the Newcastle supporters’ away finish.

Requested concerning the executions after the sport, Newcastle supervisor Eddie Howe advised reporters he would “persist with the soccer.”

Advertisement

“I am nonetheless bitterly upset concerning the outcome,” Howe added.

Havertz, the controversial hero

A lot of his disappointment stemmed from Havertz’s function as matchwinner, with Howe alleging that the German shouldn’t have been on the pitch to attain his late decider.

Havertz was booked for an elbow on Newcastle defender Dan Burn in the course of the first-half, with the video assistant referee (VAR) not deeming it severe sufficient to be a pink card.

Having annoyed the hosts for almost all of the sport, extra perceived injustice adopted for Newcastle within the second-half when Chelsea’s Trevoh Chalobah seemed to have fouled Jacob Murphy within the field, but no penalty was given.

Advertisement
Havertz's late goal took the points, but Newcastle manager Eddie Howe believed the German should not have been on the pitch.

“Dan [Burn] thinks it is a clear pink,” Howe advised reporters. “It may’ve been given.

“The one I am most upset with and do not perceive the way it’s not been given is the penalty … Jacob Murphy’s had his shirt ripped off his again close to sufficient.”

It’s stated that soccer is commonly a merciless mistress, and for Newcastle, she stayed true to script as Havertz — moments from the top of regulation time — plucked Jorginho’s excellent go out of the sky with a deft contact earlier than poking previous Magpies keeper Martin Dubravka.

Cue delirium at Stamford Bridge as Chelsea, regardless of all of the noise, secured a fifth consecutive win within the Premier League.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Joe Biden vows to stay in fight with Trump as pressure to quit mounts

Published

on

Joe Biden vows to stay in fight with Trump as pressure to quit mounts

Standard Digital

Weekend Print + Standard Digital

Complete digital access to quality FT journalism with expert analysis from industry leaders. Pay a year upfront and save 20%.

Continue Reading

News

4 killed, 9 injured after vehicle crashes into Long Island nail salon

Published

on

4 killed, 9 injured after vehicle crashes into Long Island nail salon

Four people were killed and nine others were injured after a minivan crashed into a Long Island, New York, nail salon Friday afternoon.

The vehicle slammed into Hawaii Nail & Spa on Grand Boulevard in Deer Park shortly before 5 p.m.

A witness told NBC New York that the van plowed through the front of the business and almost came out through the back of the salon.

All of those killed or injured were inside the salon at the time, according to Lt. Kevin Heissenbuttel. Some people were trapped in the salon and had to be extricated by emergency services, he said.

A witness said the vehicle had been racing through a parking lot across the street before crashing and “seemingly in a rush,” NBC New York reported, adding that others said the van was trying to get around another vehicle when it drove into the building.

Advertisement

The van was seen racing though a parking lot across the street, NBC New York reported. A witness said it was trying to pass another vehicle when it drove into the building, the station reported.

Photos from the scene showed a gaping hole in the storefront.

The Associated Press reported that a witness said he heard a speeding car and then a “shattering” noise.

“It was a sound that I never heard before,” he said.

The vehicle’s driver was among the injured and transported to a hospital.

Advertisement

The Deer Park Fire Department chief said it was not clear what caused the vehicle to crash into the business.

About 150 firefighters and EMS personnel responded to the scene.

Continue Reading

News

Trump-Biden debate draws smaller audience as voters tune out US election

Published

on

Trump-Biden debate draws smaller audience as voters tune out US election

Unlock the US Election Countdown newsletter for free

Thursday night’s US presidential debate was watched by 48mn television viewers, a sharp drop from the numbers that tuned in to the clashes between Joe Biden and Donald Trump in the 2020 campaign.

CNN, the Warner Bros Discovery-owned network which hosted the event, said just over 9mn viewers had watched on its own channels, narrowly ahead of Fox News and ABC News, with cable rival MSNBC drawing about 4mn viewers. Another 30mn people tuned in on CNN’s digital channels or YouTube, it added.

The combined television audiences were well below the totals for previous presidential debates, however, extending a pattern of US media outlets reporting less interest in their election coverage this year.

Advertisement

Trump and Biden drew 73mn viewers for their first debate in 2020, while Trump and Hillary Clinton pulled in an audience of 84mn for the opening showdown of their 2016 contest.

With full control over the style, content and format of the debate, CNN inserted rules that are atypical for US political events, such as foregoing a live audience and muting each candidate’s microphones unless it was their turn to speak.

Have your say

Joe Biden vs Donald Trump: tell us how the 2024 US election will affect you

The debate was also a stark departure in tone from last year’s CNN town hall event with Trump, when a studio audience filled with the former president’s supporters prompted comparisons with his raucous rallies. CNN’s own media commentator slammed the town hall as a “spectacle of lies”, and Chris Licht resigned as CNN’s chief executive just a few weeks later.

By comparison, Thursday’s night’s debate was restrained. With microphones muted, there were no shouting matches, and with no audience or press in the room, it was quiet. The moderators played a background role, leaving the debate largely a back-and-forth dialogue between Trump and Biden. 

Advertisement

However CNN was criticised for one significant choice: moderators Jake Tapper and Dana Bash largely avoided fact-checking the candidates in real time. The format seemed to favour Trump, who was allowed to make a series of unsubstantiated claims without being challenged during the 90-minute programme. 

The debate was a big test for CNN — the network that pioneered the dramatic, ultra-competitive cable news format in the US in the 1980s, but whose audiences have dwindled in recent years. It was easily the biggest moment yet for CNN chief executive Sir Mark Thompson, who took over as leader of the channel last year and has been tasked with turning around its business and restoring its brand.

CNN landed the sponsorship of the debate in May, beating out competitors including Fox News. The network seized on the moment, promoting the event heavily and forcing its rivals, who simultaneously broadcast the debate, to display CNN’s logo prominently on their screens.

The event was unique for a number of reasons. It was the first presidential debate in decades that was not organised by an independent commission, after Biden and Trump chose to bypass the tradition. It was also scheduled far earlier than usual in the election cycle. In previous years, the initial match-ups between presidential candidates took place in September or October. 

CNN has a fraught history with Trump, who frequently attacked the channel during his presidency. But on Friday morning, the Trump campaign blasted an email out to his supporters titled: “I love CNN . . . Because they gave me the opportunity to wipe the floor with Joe Biden.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending