It took just a few hours for Friedrich Merz to conduct one of the sharpest U-turns in recent political history.

At lunchtime last Friday, Germany’s chancellor-to-be received a sobering briefing on the state of the economy from finance minister Jörg Kukies.

Kukies explained that after two years of stagnation and with more clouds gathering over Europe’s largest economy, Berlin faced a €130bn budget shortfall over four years and dwindling growth potential, according to people with knowledge of the presentation.

Shortly afterwards, Donald Trump had a public shouting match in the Oval Office with Volodymyr Zelenskyy, accusing the Ukrainian leader of not wanting peace with Russia, Kyiv’s aggressor, and not being grateful for Washington’s support. For Washington’s allies in Europe, the extraordinary scenes were further evidence that the Trump administration had turned hostile.

Watching all this unfold, Merz decided “there was no time to lose”, says a person close to his thinking.

Within days, the centre-right leader of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) struck a deal with the Social Democratic party (SPD), his likely coalition partner in the next government, which would transform the way Germany manages its economy.

The two parties agreed to loosen the country’s constitutional debt brake and inject hundreds of billions into Germany’s military and ageing infrastructure — a breakthrough upending more than two decades of conservative fiscal dogma.

Under the agreement, which still has to be approved by parliament with a two-thirds majority, Berlin would be able to raise as much debt as needed to equip the Bundeswehr. In return for its support on defence, the SPD secured the creation of a €500bn, 10-year infrastructure fund to modernise the country’s roads, bridges, energy and communications networks — one of the party’s flagship campaign pledges.

It was time to adopt a “whatever it takes” approach to defence in light of the “threats to freedom and peace” in Europe, Merz said on Tuesday when he announced the deal alongside the leaders of his Bavarian sister party CSU and the SPD.

Not only does the agreement represent a stark departure from the brand of economic orthodoxy that has been dominant in Germany, it also accelerates a move away from decades of military restraint after the second world war.

“It is a huge shift away from this stance of ‘You make do with the money you’ve got, rather than borrow’ that has been the pillar of the modern German economy, and has been something Germans have really prided themselves in,” says historian Katja Hoyer.

“It signals that Germany is going to play a bigger role on the world stage, but also that Germany will look more after its own interests.”

The prospect of huge investments into the defence sector has also fuelled hopes Germany could halt its industrial and technological decline by helping manufacturers and engineers find a new purpose and new markets — with positive effects rippling through the Eurozone.

This is “one of the most important shifts in German economic policy” since the second world war, says Vikram Aggarwal, investment manager at Jupiter Fund Management, as Germany adapts to a “multipolar word” where countries and regions “will have to increasingly provide for their own defence”.

According to Joe Kaeser, former chief of German engineering giant Siemens, now chair of Siemens Energy and Daimler Truck: “It means we are going to be back, Germany — we don’t know exactly how, but this is what we are going to achieve.”

With potentially more than €1tn in additional debt over the next decade, economists have compared the fiscal stimulus to the country’s reunification in 1990, when the government led by CDU chancellor Helmut Kohl poured billions into the former eastern communist states.

The effects on Germany’s industry should be significant, economists, policymakers and business executives believe, as defence contractors help replace part of the shrinking automotive base and infrastructure projects jolt the construction sector back into life.

“One should not underestimate what confidence does on decision-making for investment and employment,” says Kaeser. “This [deal] is a priceless effort to set out a mission — to say this is what we’re going to do: this landing on the moon.”

BNP says that the announcement can deliver “a positive confidence shock”, galvanising consumers and companies. The German economy — stuck in a rut for the past two years — could expand 0.7 per cent as soon as 2025, compared to 0.2 per cent growth in a previous scenario, the bank estimates.

Economists predict the debt-to-GDP ratio, currently at 63 per cent, will still be far lower than that of France or Italy. While German stocks soared, the country’s borrowing costs, traditionally the lowest in the Eurozone, jumped by the most since the 1990s, as investors adjusted to Berlin’s newfound boldness.

The new package would accelerate industrial shifts already under way since outgoing chancellor Olaf Scholz set up a special €100bn military fund in 2022, in the wake of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. At the time, he described the move as Zeitenwende — historic turning point — in his nation’s approach to defence and security. Germany is the second largest supplier of arms to Ukraine behind the US.

The race to re-arm could be a much-needed boost for German manufacturing, which has been hit by the crisis in carmaking, looming trade wars, and growing competition from cheap Chinese steel and car imports.

German weapons maker Rheinmetall, whose stock has nearly doubled this year, is converting some of its own domestic car-part plants to produce military equipment. Last month Franco-German tank maker KNDS agreed to take over and convert a train-making factory from Alstom in the eastern town of Görlitz to produce parts for battle tanks and other military vehicles.

Hensoldt, a state-owned maker of sensors and radars, is in talks to hire teams of software engineers from Continental and Bosch, two of Germany’s largest automotive suppliers, which together have announced over 10,000 job cuts in the past year.

Excitement spread among Deutsche Bahn staff this week, at the thought that the state-owned railway known for its delayed trains and signalling failures would receive the money to implement a €53bn renovation plan stuck in limbo since the collapse of Scholz’s coalition in November.

Boris Pistorius, SPD defence minister, has been one of the most vocal advocates for debt brake reform. German’s most popular politician, who hopes to remain in his post under a Merz-led coalition, described this week’s announcement as “a truly far-reaching, historic decision”, saying: “We are taking responsibility for our security not only as Germany, but also for our Nato partners.”

That Merz, of all German politicians, would orchestrate such a dramatic policy shift, has startled many in Germany. A staunch Atlanticist in the tradition of postwar chancellor Konrad Adenauer, the 69-year-old former BlackRock senior adviser has built a reputation as a supply-side conservative sceptical of state intervention.

During the campaign, he vowed to cut taxes, regulation and welfare benefits. While he did not rule out a reform of the borrowing limits, he insisted that budget priorities first be set and cuts decided.

“It’s a typical ‘Nixon-goes-to-China’ moment,” says a person close to the negotiations.

“You don’t choose the historic moments in which you live,” says Sophia Besch, senior fellow in the Europe Program at the Washington-based Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. “Merz, as a transatlantacist, would not have chosen to be the chancellor overseeing the divorce with the US.”

Merz has no choice but to act quickly, his allies argue. His only chance of securing a supermajority to pass the constitutional amendments is to use the outgoing parliament, which can be reconvened until March 25.

Beyond that date, the far-right Alternative for Germany and far-left Die Linke, which oppose reforming the debt brake to fund more defence spending, will enjoy a blocking minority. Merz still needs to win over the Greens to pass the bills.

“Merz is totally convinced that we need money for defence. We don’t know how much, but we know that after March 25, a minority of Putin-friendly parties can stop any kind of additional defence money for the foreseeable future,” says Roland Koch, a veteran CDU politician and close ally of Merz. “Only the Social Democrats and the Greens can be allies, and you have to pay a price — the €500bn fund for infrastructure is the price.”

Merz succeeded in sealing a defence pact with the SPD before a meeting of EU leaders in Brussels on Thursday. As chancellor-in-waiting he could not officially attend the gathering, which was designed to co-ordinate the bloc’s response to Trump’s efforts to negotiate a settlement with Russian President Vladimir Putin over Ukraine — Scholz is still Germany’s caretaker chancellor.

But Merz managed to steal the show, flying to the Belgian capital the day before to meet Nato chief Mark Rutte, EU diplomatic head Kaja Kallas and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen.

On Thursday in Brussels, when asked about his government talks with the SPD on the sidelines of a meeting of Europe’s centre-right leaders, he quipped: “We are on good speaking terms . . . when it comes to spending money!”

Back home however, Merz is facing two weeks of tricky legislative hurdles and institutional obstacles.

“A lot of people are very sceptical,” says a senior Bundeswehr commander, who warned of sluggish procurement and vast manpower deficiencies. Addressing those problems, he said, was “not going to take months, it’s going to take years”.

Merz’s package includes a plan to overhaul defence procurement. But Christian Mölling, Europe director at the Bertelsmann Foundation, a think-tank, says that trying to enact structural reforms while also spending much larger sums of money would be like performing open heart surgery. “While it is pumping you’re also trying to change something — and that’s an enormous stress.”

The same logic applies to infrastructure projects, says Jens Südekum, a professor of economics at Düsseldorf’s Heinrich Heine University. Not only must policymakers allocate the money wisely to maximise impact on growth, they also needed to speed up implementation.

This grand coalition that isn’t so grand any more is keen to prove that this is a new start

There could be more immediate political snags. The Greens, furious at Merz’s sudden conversion after years of opposing their calls for debt brake reform, have decided to make him sweat, heralding hard bargaining until the old Bundestag is reconvened next week.

But most analysts expect the Greens to support the package in return for assurances that part of the money will go towards the green transition.

Another difficulty for the CDU/CSU and the SPD will be to re-mobilise all their outgoing MPs, who may have little incentive to abide by party discipline when it comes to attendance or voting.

Hoyer believes that the increasing pressure — external from Trump, internal with a resurgent far right and far left — is likely to unite Germany’s mainstream parties.

“This grand coalition that isn’t so grand any more is keen to prove that this is a new start,” she says. “Domestically, they’re quite aware that they’ve only got four years. And if they don’t do anything, then the AfD and Die Linke will probably increase [their support] further.”

Additional reporting by Patricia Nilsson in Frankfurt and Ben Hall in Brussels

Data visualisation by Keith Fray

COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) — A South Carolina man who killed his ex-girlfriend’s parents with a baseball bat was executed by firing squad Friday, the first U.S. prisoner in 15 years to die by that method, which he saw as preferable to the electric chair or lethal injection.

Three volunteer prison employees used rifles to carry out the execution of Brad Sigmon, 67, who was pronounced dead at 6:08 p.m.

Sigmon killed David and Gladys Larke in their Greenville County home in 2001 in a botched plot to kidnap their daughter. He told police he planned to take her for a romantic weekend, then kill her and himself.

Sigmon’s lawyers said he chose the firing squad because the electric chair would “cook him alive,” and he feared that a lethal injection of pentobarbital into his veins would send a rush of fluid and blood into his lungs and drown him.

The details of South Carolina’s lethal injection method are kept secret in South Carolina, and Sigmon unsuccessfully asked the state Supreme Court on Thursday to pause his execution because of that.

On Friday, Sigmon wore a black jumpsuit with a hood over his head and a white target with a red bullseye over his chest.

The armed prison employees stood 15 feet (4.6 meters) from where he sat in the state’s death chamber — the same distance as the backboard is from the free-throw line on a basketball court. Visible in the same small room was the state’s unused electric chair. The gurney used to carry out lethal injections had been rolled away.

The volunteers all fired at the same time through openings in a wall. They were not visible to about a dozen witnesses in a room separated from the chamber by bullet-resistant glass. Sigmon made several heavy breaths during the two minutes that elapsed from when the hood was placed to the shots being fired.

The shots, which sounded like they were fired at the same time, made a loud, jarring bang that caused witnesses to flinch. His arms briefly tensed when he was shot, and the target was blasted off his chest. He appeared to give another breath or two with a red stain on his chest, and small amounts of tissue could be seen from the wound during those breaths.

A doctor came out about a minute later and examined Sigmon for 90 seconds before declaring him dead.

Witnesses included three family members of the Larkes. Also present were Sigmon’s attorney and spiritual advisor, a representative from the prosecuting solicitor’s office, a sheriff’s investigator and three members of the news media.

Advertisement

Sigmon’s lawyer read a closing statement that he said was “one of love and a calling to my fellow Christians to help us end the death penalty.”

Prison spokeswoman Chrysti Shain said Sigmon’s last meal was four pieces of fried chicken, green beans, mashed potatoes with gravy, biscuits, cheesecake and sweet tea.

The firing squad is an execution method with a long and violent history in the U.S. and around the world. Death in a hail of bullets has been used to punish mutinies and desertion in armies, as frontier justice in America’s Old West and as a tool of terror and political repression in the former Soviet Union and Nazi Germany.

Since 1977 only three other prisoners in the U.S. have been executed by firing squad. All were in Utah, most recently Ronnie Lee Gardner in 2010. Another Utah man, Ralph Menzies, could be next; he is awaiting the result of a hearing in which his lawyers argued that his dementia makes him unfit for execution.

In South Carolina on Friday, a group of protesters holding signs with messages such as “All life is precious” and “Execute justice not people” gathered outside the prison before Sigmon’s execution.

Supporters and lawyers for Sigmon asked Republican Gov. Henry McMaster to commute his sentence to life in prison. They said he was a model prisoner trusted by guards and worked every day to atone for the killings and also that he committed the killings after succumbing to severe mental illness.

Advertisement

But McMaster denied the clemency plea. No governor has ever commuted a death sentence in the state, where 46 other prisoners have been executed since the death penalty resumed in the U.S. in 1976. Seven have died in the electric chair and 39 others by lethal injection.

Gerald “Bo” King, chief of the capital habeas unit in the federal public defender’s office, said Sigmon “used his final statement to call on his fellow people of faith to end the death penalty and spare the lives of the 28 men still locked up on South Carolina’s death row.”

“It is unfathomable that, in 2025, South Carolina would execute one of its citizens in this bloody spectacle,” King said in a statement. “But South Carolina has ended the life of a man who has devoted himself to his faith, and to ministry and service to all around him. Brad admitted his guilt at trial and shared his deep grief for his crimes with his jury and, in the years since, with everyone who knew him.”

In the early 2000s, South Carolina was among the busiest death penalty states, carrying out an average of three executions a year. But officials suspended executions for 13 years, in part because they were unable to obtain lethal injection drugs.

The state Supreme Court cleared the way to resume them in July. Freddie Owens was the first to be put to death, on Sept. 20, after McMaster denied him clemency. Richard Moore was executed on Nov. 1 and Marion Bowman Jr. on Jan. 31.

Going forward the court will allow an execution every five weeks.

South Carolina now has 28 inmates on its death row including two who have exhausted their appeals and are awaiting execution, most likely this spring. Just one man has been added to death row in the past decade.

Before executions were paused, more than 60 people faced death sentences. Many of those have either had their sentences reduced to life or died in prison.

___

Associated Press writer Adrian Sainz in Memphis, Tennessee, contributed.