Connect with us

News

Donald Trump committed ‘repeated’ fraud by inflating real estate value, New York judge rules

Published

on

Donald Trump committed ‘repeated’ fraud by inflating real estate value, New York judge rules

Receive free Donald Trump updates

Donald Trump, his oldest sons and his businesses orchestrated a “persistent and repeated fraud” in which they vastly exaggerated the extent of the former president’s wealth to procure favourable loans, a New York judge ruled, in an order that could deal a damaging blow to Trump’s real estate empire.

Judge Arthur Engoron on Tuesday found that the Trump Organization had inflated the value of properties in Manhattan and Florida, as well as golf courses in the US and Scotland, by hundreds of millions of dollars. He also ordered the suspension of licences for Trump’s New York entities.

However the impact of the decision was not immediately clear, leading an attorney for Trump, Christopher Kise, to ask for a clarification during a court hearing on Wednesday on whether assets such as the flagship Trump Tower would have to be sold. Engoron declined to elaborate on the order, saying: “I am not prepared to issue a ruling right now.”

Advertisement

The ruling is the latest development in a case brought by New York attorney-general Letitia James in 2022, which is due to go to trial on Monday. The trial will determine further damages and the matter of whether the defendants were also liable for issuing false financial statements and insurance fraud.

In a statement released on his Truth Social platform, Trump said the ruling was a “terrible reminder that the Radical Left Democrats will stop at nothing” in trying to prevent him from winning office again.

Kise said the court was seeking to “nationalise one of the most successful corporate empires in the United States and seize control of private property all while acknowledging there is zero evidence of any default, breach, late payment or any complaint of harm”.

James wrote on the social media platform X: “We look forward to presenting the rest of our case at trial.” Her office did not provide a further statement and did not respond to requests for comment on the potential suspension of Donald Trump’s business licences in New York.

The long-running lawsuit brought by James’ office alleges Trump and his businesses inflated the value of assets by more than $2bn in total to obtain hundreds of millions of dollars in loans on favourable terms.

Advertisement

The attorney-general is seeking to recover $250mn in damages and attempting to bar the defendants from ever acting as an officer or director of a corporation in the state again.

The ruling deals a significant setback to the eponymous business empire that made Trump a household name and adds to the mountain of legal woes he faces while vying to again become the Republican nominee for president next year. The 77-year-old has been charged in four separate criminal indictments over matters including the retention of classified documents and attempting to subvert the result of the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty to all charges.

In his decision, Engoron agreed with the New York attorney-general’s office that assets including a Park Avenue skyscraper and a property on Wall Street were unlawfully inflated, and further ordered that several of Trump’s New York businesses be dissolved, accusing them of continuing to “disseminate false and misleading information” even after a monitor was appointed by the court last November.

Lawyers for the Trumps, including Kise, a former solicitor-general of Florida, were also fined $7,500 each by the court for repeatedly making “frivolous” arguments.

The judge also dismissed arguments by the Trump lawyers that the banks in question, including Deutsche Bank, were not defrauded as the loans were ultimately repaid in full.

Advertisement

Trump himself echoed this on social media, saying no harm had been done to the “sophisticated Wall Street banks” from whom he borrowed money. But Engoron said “the first principle of loan accounting is that as risk rises, so do interest rates”, and the lenders could have made “even more money” had the true value of Trump’s collateral been stated.

In his ruling the judge accused Trump’s lawyers of living in a “fantasy world” in which “square footage [is] subjective”. He ruled that Trump had overvalued his Trump Tower apartment by up to $207mn, falsely stating in annual financial records that it was almost three times its actual size, and — in one year — exaggerated the value of apartments in Park Avenue by 700 per cent.

“Good faith measurements could vary by as much as 10-20 per cent, not 200 per cent,” Engoron wrote, adding that Trump’s lawyers were asking the court not to “believe its own eyes”.

A discrepancy “of this size, by a real estate developer sizing up his own living space of decades, can only be considered fraud”, he wrote.

Engoron further found that Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort had been inflated by at least 2,300 per cent compared with an appraiser’s assessment.

Advertisement

Donald Trump’s case will not be heard before a jury as stated in an earlier version of this article, which has also been updated to correct the year in which the lawsuit was originally filed.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Video: Inside Trump’s Shifting Stance on Iran

Published

on

Video: Inside Trump’s Shifting Stance on Iran

President Trump spent the first months of his term holding back Israel’s push for an assault on Iran’s nuclear program. With the war underway, he has now expressed support for Israel. Jonathan Swan, a White House reporter for The New York Times, breaks down how the president got to this point.

Continue Reading

News

Donald Trump plans to delay TikTok ban for a third time

Published

on

Donald Trump plans to delay TikTok ban for a third time

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

The White House has said it will allow TikTok to continue operations in the US for another 90 days, extending a deadline for the popular Chinese-owned social media app to divest a stake in the platform to satisfy American law.

“President [Donald] Trump will sign an additional executive order this week to keep TikTok up and running,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Tuesday. “As he has said many times, president Trump does not want TikTok to go dark.

“This extension will last 90 days, which the administration will spend working to ensure this deal is closed so that the American people can continue to use TikTok with the assurance that their data is safe and secure.”

Advertisement

Last year, Congress passed legislation to force ByteDance, TikTok’s Chinese owner, to sell the app or face a ban in the US.

Trump has promised to “save” the app and has twice extended the deadline — first from January to April, and then from April to June 19 — after failing to deliver a deal, which requires sign-off from China.

Ahead of the April deadline, the White House was closing in on an agreement that would spin off TikTok from ByteDance and create a US company to receive new investment, diluting the stakes of Chinese investors. 

Under the terms of that deal, investors, including Andreessen Horowitz and Blackstone, would have owned about half of TikTok’s US business, while large existing investors, including General Atlantic, Susquehanna and KKR, would have held about 30 per cent of the new entity.

The Financial Times has previously reported that the White House had considered other potential outside investors, including rightwing media star Tucker Carlson.

Advertisement

ByteDance told the White House and investors that Beijing was willing to approve the deal, according to one person familiar with the matter. But after Trump announced tariffs on China and other countries on April 2, ByteDance informed the investors that Beijing had rescinded its approval. The White House was waiting for the US-China trade tensions to ease before trying to resurrect the deal, according to the person.

In 2020, during his first term as president, Trump moved to block TikTok, writing in an executive order that its data collection “threatens to allow the Chinese Communist party access to Americans’ personal and proprietary information”.

Trump changed his approach to the platform, however, after he used it to reach younger voters in the 2024 election. In May, Trump told NBC that he had “a little warm spot in my heart for TikTok”.

Continue Reading

News

NAACP won't invite Trump to its national convention, breaking a 116-year tradition

Published

on

NAACP won't invite Trump to its national convention, breaking a 116-year tradition

The NAACP logo is shown during an event at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C., in 2015. The civil rights group has announced it won’t invite President Trump to address its convention, breaking a 116-year tradition of inviting sitting presidents.

Win McNamee/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Win McNamee/Getty Images

NAACP logo featuring the scales of justice and the founding date of 1909 is shown during an event in Washington, D.C. in 2015

The NAACP logo is shown during an event at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C., in 2015. The civil rights group has announced it won’t invite President Trump to address its convention, breaking a 116-year tradition of inviting sitting presidents.

Win McNamee/Getty Images

The NAACP announced it will not invite President Trump to its national convention in July. The civil rights organization is breaking from its 116-year tradition of welcoming the sitting U.S. president to the annual event that draws NAACP supporters from around the country.

The group says Trump is the first president it has declined to invite.

Advertisement

NAACP President and CEO Derrick Johnson made the announcement Monday at a news conference in Charlotte, N.C., where the convention is scheduled to be held. The group also shared a statement from Johnson.

“Donald Trump is attacking our democracy and our civil rights … The president has signed unconstitutional executive orders to oppress voters and undo federal civil rights protections,” Johnson said. “… he continually undermines every pillar of our democracy to make himself more powerful and to personally benefit from the U.S. government.”

The White House responded sharply on Tuesday to the president’s exclusion from the event. Trump declined previous invitations during his first term.

“The NAACP isn’t advancing anything but hate and division, while the President is focused on uniting our country, improving our economy, securing our borders, and establishing peace across the globe,” White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said in a statement to NPR. “This is the same vision for America that a record number of Black Americans supported in the resounding reelection of President Trump.”

The NAACP has welcomed both Democratic and Republican presidents to address the convention over the years. Presidents have historically used their remarks to build stronger ties with the Black community.

Advertisement

President Ronald Reagan addressed the NAACP convention in Denver in 1981 and spoke out against racism and discrimination. President George W. Bush spoke at the convention in Washington, D.C., in 2006 amid criticism of his administration’s handling of Hurricane Katrina. The storm disproportionately affected Black residents in New Orleans and the Gulf region. In his remarks, Bush resolved to work with the Black community to recover from the storm. He had declined previous invitations to the event.

The NAACP has filed a number civil rights lawsuits against the administration since Trump’s return to the White House, including a challenge to efforts to cut federal funding to schools that use diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs. The organization has also filed suit to block plans to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education.

The Trump administration has enacted a series of substantial changes that the NAACP says conflicts with its mission of achieving equity, political rights, and social inclusion for Black Americans and all people of color. The changes include eliminating DEI programs in higher education and across the federal government; removing some Black historical figures from government websites; and restoring the names of military bases that originally honored white supremacists and owners of enslaved people.

Continue Reading

Trending