Connect with us

News

Disney tells its lobbyists to step up fight against DeSantis and his allies in Florida

Published

on

Disney tells its lobbyists to step up fight against DeSantis and his allies in Florida

Stickers and attire selling Florida Governor Ron DeSantis sit on a desk earlier than a guide tour occasion on the North Charleston Coliseum on April 19, 2023 in North Charleston, South Carolina. 

Sean Rayford | Getty Photographs

Disney is making ready to take its struggle with Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and his GOP allies within the state legislature to the subsequent stage, based on folks aware of the matter.

With simply weeks till Florida’s legislative session ends, Disney is pushing lobbyists to step up their efforts to affect the Republican-controlled state legislature and to focus on land use associated payments that would damage the corporate, amongst different measures, mentioned the folks, who declined to be named in an effort to converse freely concerning the points.

Advertisement

A spokesman for Disney declined to touch upon the lobbying effort.

The battle between the leisure big and DeSantis began final yr after Disney opposed the Florida invoice that critics named “Do not Say Homosexual,” which forbids instruction on sexual orientation and gender identification in public colleges for kindergarten by third grade.

Then, earlier than DeSantis may strip the district the place Disney relies of its self-governing standing and exchange the board that oversaw the realm, a Disney-allied panel signed a long-lasting growth settlement that drastically limits the governor’s management. DeSantis has mentioned that state legislators are drafting laws to nullify that settlement.

Republican officers and enterprise leaders have more and more criticized DeSantis’ salvos in opposition to the corporate. Former President Donald Trump and former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie — two of Florida governor’s potential 2024 rivals — and even former Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein have all pushed again on DeSantis for his battle with the corporate.

Since DeSantis steered Monday that he needed to develop land close to Disney World, probably by constructing a jail, Disney introduced that “inexpensive and attainable housing” across the park is about to open in 2026.

Advertisement

Republican Florida state Sen. Blaise Ingoglia warned Disney to not struggle again, as he stood subsequent to DeSantis at a information convention Monday.

“I’ve a pair phrases for Disney. You aren’t going to win this struggle. This governor will,” Ingoglia mentioned. “One phrase of recommendation for Disney going ahead: let it go. Simply let it go.”

On the identical occasion, DeSantis vowed to nullify an settlement that will enable the Orlando amusement park to bypass a particular governing district board full of DeSantis appointees.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis solutions questions throughout a press convention at Seminole State Faculty in Sanford, Florida, Monday, Might 16, 2022.

Joe Burbank | Orlando Sentinel | Getty Photographs

Advertisement

Shortly after DeSantis’ remarks on Monday, Disney executives referred to as on lobbyists to keep watch over any Florida payments that would damage the corporate and to begin aggressively working in opposition to them, based on an individual with direct data of the matter. There’s a specific curiosity in combatting laws associated to land use following DeSantis’ remarks, this particular person mentioned.

This particular person, who was unauthorized to talk publicly on Disney’s plans, instructed CNBC that one of many land-related payments Disney lobbyists are watching rigorously is CS/SB 1604: Land Use and Growth Laws. Ingoglia launched the invoice within the Senate, and an an identical invoice was put ahead within the state Home.

Each chambers have launched amendments that would have an effect on Disney. The measures would enable a “newly elected or appointed governing physique of the impartial particular district,” such because the DeSantis-appointed governing physique of the Disney district, to assessment any growth agreements and have the choice to vote on whether or not that district will readopt that unique growth deal.

Each of these amendments have been filed on Tuesday, the day after the DeSantis’ press convention the place he hammered Disney, based on the state legislature web site.

Disney and CEO Bob Iger do not look like taking DeSantis and his allies’ newest strikes flippantly.

Advertisement

Buddies of Iger’s say that the Disney CEO could possibly be hoping {that a} new lobbying effort in opposition to DeSantis and allies, together with a vital public notion of the governor’s actions, may dissuade sufficient Republican officers from siding with the governor. DeSantis successfully controls the state legislature with a GOP supermajority.

“It is virtually like each time DeSantis says these loopy issues Bob comes out forward,” a longtime ally of Iger’s instructed CNBC. “He feels Disney is prepared for the struggle however I feel he is form of watching the governor attempt to float his personal boat on this one.”

A Disney spokesman instructed CNBC that this notion of Iger is “not correct.”

Bob Iger, CEO, Disney, throughout CNBC interview, Feb. 9, 2023.

Randy Shropshire | CNBC

Advertisement

DeSantis’ potential opponents in a presidential major have pounced on the controversy as an opportunity to stay it to the Florida governor. Trump, who’s working for president, and Christie, one other potential 2024 candidate, have each ripped DeSantis for his conflict with Disney.

“Disney’s subsequent transfer would be the announcement that no extra money will likely be invested in Florida due to the Governor – Actually, they may even announce a gradual withdrawal or sale of sure properties, or the entire thing,” Trump mentioned in a Reality Social submit response to DeSantis’ newest struggle with the corporate, with out citing proof that the corporate may take these steps.

Early GOP major polls present DeSantis because the second main candidate behind Trump. The ex-president has held an enormous edge in many of the latest polls.

The Disney feud could price DeSantis donors, too. Some Republican megadonors, who have been as soon as staunchly in DeSantis’ nook for 2024 GOP, have referred to as the governor’s allies not too long ago to say they won’t assist him run for president, based on a longtime DeSantis ally. As an alternative, they mentioned they may again one other attainable candidate in Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., this particular person mentioned.

There could also be a means out of the protracted struggle, nevertheless. Earlier than DeSantis’ newest assault, Iger had hinted to Time that he was open to attempting to make amends with the governor.

Advertisement

“I don’t view this as a going-to-mattresses state of affairs for us. If the governor of Florida needs to fulfill with me to debate all of this, in fact, I’d be glad to try this,” he mentioned.

Iger has additionally publicly ripped DeSantis’ remedy of Disney.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Minneapolis Promises Police Overhaul in Deal With Justice Department

Published

on

Minneapolis Promises Police Overhaul in Deal With Justice Department

The Minneapolis City Council unanimously voted on Monday to overhaul its police department to address a pattern of systemic abuses, as part of an agreement with the Department of Justice.

Lawyers from the Department of Justice and the city, where George Floyd was killed in 2020 by a police officer, have raced in recent weeks to finalize terms of the deal, known as a consent decree, before President-elect Donald J. Trump takes office. The previous Trump administration opposed the use of consent decrees, and the fate of nearly a dozen other federal investigations into American police departments is uncertain.

Under the deal approved on Monday, the Minneapolis department promised to closely track and investigate allegations of police misconduct, rein in the use of force, and improve officer training.

“This agreement reflects what our community has asked for and what we know is necessary: real accountability and meaningful change,” Mayor Jacob Frey of Minneapolis said in a statement.

Federal oversight, the strongest tool available to overhaul police departments with histories of abuse, begins with an exhaustive civil rights investigation and a report of findings. Cities then usually agree to negotiate a consent decree, a court-enforced oversight agreement, in order to avoid a federal lawsuit.

Advertisement

The Minneapolis decree was set in motion in the summer of 2023 after the Department of Justice issued a report accusing the city’s police department of routinely discriminating against Black and Native American residents, of needlessly using deadly force and of violating the First Amendment rights of protesters and journalists. The Minneapolis police union did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

City officials and lawyers from the Justice Department said they intended to present the deal to a federal judge, who will be responsible for overseeing its implementation.

During Mr. Trump’s first term in the White House, the Justice Department rejected such decrees, coming out in opposition to deals in Chicago and Baltimore and refraining from entering new ones. More recently, during a campaign rally last year, Mr. Trump said that in order to crack down on crime, the police should be allowed to be “extraordinarily rough,” and he spoke about the possibility of letting officers loose from constraints during “one really violent day.”

Officials in Minneapolis said they would remain committed to lasting change in the city’s police department, even if the Trump administration were to walk away from federal consent decrees. Several months before the Department of Justice report was issued, the city agreed to a policing overhaul as part of an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights.

Minneapolis set aside $27 million in its 2024 and 2025 budgets to pay for changes in response to the state and federal investigations. The city also paid $27 million to Mr. Floyd’s family in 2021 to settle their wrongful death lawsuit.

Advertisement

Consent decrees were pursued aggressively under President Barack Obama, whose administration entered into 15 of the decrees in a time of a growing public outcry over police abuses.

After Mr. Trump’s administration steered away from such decrees, the Justice Department under the Biden administration sought to bring them back, launching a dozen civil rights investigations into police departments.

But the Biden administration has been slow to bring those efforts to a resolution, in some cases letting years elapse. The Justice Department’s civil rights division has released a flurry of investigative findings in recent weeks, covering cities like Memphis, where the department found excessive force and racial discrimination; Mount Vernon, N.Y., where it found illegal arrests and strip searches; and Oklahoma City, where it found chronic mistreatment of people with behavioral disabilities by the police.

Some cities, like Memphis and Phoenix, which was the subject of an investigation after an extraordinarily high number of shootings by the police, have balked at entering into oversight agreements. The agreements usually call for changes in a number of aspects of a police department’s operations, training, policies and discipline, and can take a decade to complete.

The Biden administration is currently enforcing 15 consent decrees reached under previous administrations, but has completed only one other new one besides Minneapolis, in Louisville, Ky.

Advertisement

Those agreements and the department’s remaining investigations will be handed over to the Trump administration.

Devlin Barrett contributed reporting.

Continue Reading

News

Michael Barr to step down as Federal Reserve’s top Wall Street regulator

Published

on

Michael Barr to step down as Federal Reserve’s top Wall Street regulator

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Michael Barr is stepping down as Wall Street’s top regulator but will stay on as a governor at the Federal Reserve, the US central bank announced on Monday.

Barr will vacate his role as vice-chair for supervision at the end of February, cutting short a four-year term that began in July 2022. He will remain as a governor until that term is up in January 2032, meaning there will be no new vacancy on the seven-member board of governors.

Barr said in a statement that he was stepping down over concerns that a “risk of a dispute over the position could be a distraction” to the Fed’s goal to safeguard the US financial system.

Advertisement

“In the current environment, I’ve determined that I would be more effective in serving the American people from my role as governor,” he said.

His decision comes just ahead of Donald Trump’s return to the White House. The president-elect has vowed to slash regulations in his second term, and his advisers were reportedly considering demoting Barr, although the transition team had not asked him to resign.

Barr’s move averts a potentially messy battle between Trump and the central bank if the president-elect had sought to force him aside after retaking office. The board’s general counsel believed that Barr would have prevailed if the issue were raised in litigation. His private counsel noted that fighting such a case would have been disruptive for the institution.

“It’s not about the legal merits, it’s about practically what it would mean for the Fed in that period of time,” Barr said in an interview with the Financial Times. “It just made sense to me to get in front of all of that and take myself out of the equation.”

Since Barr is staying on as a Fed governor, Trump will have to select a new vice-chair for supervision from among the current group of governors. They include officials such as Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, both of who Trump selected for their jobs during his first term as president. Bowman, in particular, has emerged in recent years as a staunch opponent to many of the rule changes proposed by Barr — making her a potential choice for the job by the president-elect.

Advertisement

The Fed on Monday said it would not make any “major rulemakings” until a successor is confirmed by the Senate.

Since Barr assumed the top regulatory role in the US government and pledged to impose more stringent rules on major lenders, the Fed has faced intense legal pressure from banking lobby groups. Some of those groups filed a lawsuit in December against the central bank over its framework for stress tests, which aim to identify vulnerabilities at specific organisations in times of economic or financial strain.

The Fed was already considering what it described as “significant changes” to the stress tests in order to reduce volatility around the results and make the process more transparent. Changes could include amending models that calculate hypothetical losses for banks, averaging results over two years to lessen the risk of large year-on-year swings, and allowing the public to comment on hypothetical scenarios each year before they are finalised.

Last year, Barr was forced to revise his landmark proposal to raise capital requirements on lenders such as JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs. A bipartisan group of US lawmakers, chief executives at the biggest banks and lobbyists had launched a ferocious opposition campaign against the implementation of the so-called Basel III Endgame — the final rules tied to an international effort to shore up the sector in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.

In September, Barr unveiled proposals that would have roughly halved the increase in capital requirements to 9 per cent for the largest US banks, versus the 19 per cent initially floated.

Advertisement

Asked about the fate of the Basel rules, Barr said he was “hopeful that the process continues to move forward”.

Republicans cheered Barr’s decision to step down. Tim Scott, the head of the powerful Senate Committee on Banking, which oversees the Fed, said Barr had “failed to meet the responsibilities of his position”.

“I stand ready to work with President Trump to ensure we have responsible financial regulators at the helm,” Scott said in a statement.

Congressman French Hill from Arkansas, who chairs the House Financial Services Committee, said he was “pleased” to hear of Barr’s resignation.

“It’s my preference that his nominee is committed to tailoring bank regulatory policies and implementing a balanced approach to prudential supervision,” he added.

Advertisement

Ian Katz at Capital Alpha Partners said Barr’s resignation set the stage for “lighter touch” oversight from the Fed. Bowman was the “most obvious candidate for the job if she wants it”, he added.

Barr said in his resignation letter to President Joe Biden that it had been an “honour and a privilege to serve as the Federal Reserve board’s vice-chair for supervision, and to work with colleagues to help maintain the stability and strength of the US financial system so that it can meet the needs of American families and businesses”.

Continue Reading

News

‘America’s democracy stood’: Kamala Harris speaks after Congress certifies Trump win – video

Published

on

‘America’s democracy stood’: Kamala Harris speaks after Congress certifies Trump win – video

Kamala Harris said she was simply doing her constitutional duty in presiding over the certification of her presidential election defeat by Donald Trump on Monday. The certification was over quickly after no Democrats rose to object the results from any state – in contrast with four years ago when dozens of Republican lawmakers formally disputed Joe Biden’s victory in key swing states

Continue Reading

Trending