Connect with us

News

Defiant Navalny has opposed Putin’s war in Ukraine from prison. His team fear for his safety | CNN

Published

on

Defiant Navalny has opposed Putin’s war in Ukraine from prison. His team fear for his safety | CNN

Editor’s Be aware: The award-winning CNN Movie “Navalny” airs on CNN this Saturday at 9 p.m. ET. You too can watch now on CNNgo and HBO Max.



CNN
 — 

Surviving President Vladimir Putin’s poisoners was only a warm-up, not a warning, for Russian opposition politician Alexey Navalny. However his defiance, in line with his political crew, has put him in a race in opposition to time with the Russian autocrat.

The query, in line with Navalny’s chief investigator, Maria Pevchikh, is whether or not he can outlast Putin and his battle in Ukraine – and on that the decision remains to be out. “Up to now, contact wooden, they haven’t gone forward with attempting to kill him once more,” she advised CNN.

On January 17, 2021, undaunted and freshly recovered from an try on his life 5 months earlier – a close to deadly dose of the lethal nerve agent Novichok delivered by Putin’s henchmen – Navalny boldly boarded a flight taking him proper again into the Kremlin’s fingers.

Advertisement

By then, Navalny had grow to be Putin’s nemesis. So sturdy is the Russian chief’s aversion to his challenger that even to this present day he refuses to say his title.

As Navalny stepped off the flight from Berlin onto the frigid tarmac at Moscow’s Sheremetyevo airport that snowy night, he knew precisely what he was entering into. Simply weeks earlier than leaving Germany, he advised CNN: “I perceive that Putin hates me, I perceive that individuals within the Kremlin are able to kill.”

Navalny’s path to understanding had come at a excessive value. He knew in intimate and excruciating element precisely how shut he had come to demise by the hands of Putin’s poisoners whereas on the political marketing campaign path in Siberia to help native candidates.

As he recovered in Berlin from the August 2020 assassination try, Navalny and his crack analysis crew – performing on some inventive sleuthing by investigative outfit Bellingcat and CNN – discovered who his would-be killers had been and found they’d been tailing him on Putin’s orders for over three years.

Advertisement

So detailed was Navalny’s information that, posing as an official with Russia’s Nationwide Safety Council, he was capable of name one of many would-be killers, who promptly confessed to lacing Navalny’s underwear with the banned nerve agent Novichok.

The safety service agent, one of a giant crew from the dreaded FSB, the Soviet KGB’s trendy alternative, even provided a critique of their failed homicide bid. He advised Navalny he’d survived solely as a result of the aircraft carrying him diverted for medical assist when he turned sick, and prompt that the assassination try might need succeeded on an extended flight.

When challenged face-to-face on the door of his Moscow house by CNN’s Clarissa Ward, who together with journalists from Der Spiegel and The Insider had additionally helped within the investigation, the agent swiftly shut himself inside. Russia has repeatedly denied any involvement within the try on Navalny’s life.

Alexey Navalny, his wife Yulia, opposition politician Lyubov Sobol and other demonstrators march in memory of murdered Kremlin critic Boris Nemtsov in downtown Moscow on February 29, 2020.

When Putin was requested if he’d tried to have Navalny killed, he smirked, saying: “If there was such a want, it will have been finished.”

Regardless of his denials, Putin’s want was clear: Navalny’s magnetism was positioning him because the Russian chief’s largest political risk.

Advertisement

In the present day he’s the best-known anti-Putin politician in Russia and is placing his life on the road to interrupt Putin’s stranglehold over Russians.

Navalny’s crew, who’re in self-imposed exile for his or her security, consider their boss is in a race for survival in opposition to Putin.

Pevchikh, who heads Navalny’s investigative crew and helped winkle out his would-be assassins, says the battle in Ukraine – which Navalny has condemned from his jail cell behind bars – will carry Putin down. The query, she says, is whether or not Navalny can survive Putin. “It’s a little bit of a race. , at this level, who lasts longer?”

A photograph taken on June 23, 2022 shows the IK-6 penal colony to which Alexey Navalny was transferred near the village of Melekhovo, in Vladimir region.

Navalny’s nearly quick incarceration after touchdown from Germany and his subsequent detention in one in every of Russia’s most harmful jails prisons – he was moved in June to a maximum-security jail facility in Melekhovo, within the Vladimir area – is not any shock.

What’s exceptional is that regardless of each bodily and psychological blow Putin’s brutal penal regime has dealt him, Navalny nonetheless refuses to be silenced.

Advertisement

Even whereas behind bars, his Instagram and Twitter accounts sustain his assaults on Putin. “He passes a whole bunch of notes and we sort them up,” Pevchikh says. She didn’t specify how the notes had been relayed.

But it surely’s not with out value: With each trumped-up flip of Putin’s tortuous authorized machinations, Navalny has needed to battle for even fundamental rights like boots and drugs. His well being has suffered, he has misplaced weight.

His daughter, Dasha Navalnaya, at present finding out at Stanford College in California, advised CNN he’s being systematically singled out for harsh therapy.

Jail authorities are repeatedly biking him out and in of solitary confinement, she says. “They put him in for every week, then take him out for sooner or later,” to attempt to break him, she mentioned. “Persons are not allowed to speak with him, and this type of isolation is absolutely purely psychological torture.”

His bodily therapy, she mentioned, is simply as horrendous. “It’s a small cell, six (or) seven-by-eight ft… a cage for somebody who’s of his six-foot-three peak,” she advised CNN’s Fareed Zakaria. “He solely has one iron stool, which is sewed to the ground. And out of non-public possessions he’s allowed to have: a mug, a toothbrush, and one e book.”

Advertisement

Up to now few days, Navalny’s lawyer has mentioned he has a “temperature, fever and a cough.” He hasn’t seen a physician but and his crew is struggling to get drugs to him in his isolation cell.

Yulia Navalnaya leaves the IK-2 male correctional facility after a court hearing, in the town of Pokrov in Vladimir Region, Russia, on February 15, 2022.

His spouse Yulia, who says she acquired a letter from Navalny on Wednesday, has additionally raised considerations about his well being. She says he has been sick for over every week, and that he’s not getting therapy and is pressured off his sick mattress in the course of the day.

Not less than 531 Russian medical doctors as of Wednesday had signed an open letter addressed to Putin to demand that Navalny needs to be supplied with essential medical help, in line with the Fb put up the place the letter was printed.

His household haven’t seen him since Might final 12 months and his daughter fears what might come subsequent. “This is without doubt one of the most harmful and well-known excessive safety prisons in Russia identified for torturing and murdering the inmates,” she mentioned.

In his final moments of freedom as police grabbed him at Sheremetyevo airport on his return to Russia practically two years in the past, Navalny kissed his spouse Yulia goodbye.

Advertisement

Outdoors, riot police beat again the crowds who’d come to welcome them dwelling. It was the start of a brand new chapter in Navalny’s wrestle, one he’s conscious he might not survive.

Earlier than leaving Germany, he’d recorded a message about what to do if the worst occurred: “My message for the scenario when I’m killed could be very easy: not quit… The one factor essential for the triumph of evil is for good folks to do nothing. So don’t be inactive.”

When Navalny appeared in a Moscow courtroom after his arrest on the airport, the massive scale of his issues was simply starting to grow to be obvious. He was defiant; lower off from the world inside a cage within the crowded courtroom, he signaled his like to his spouse simply yards away within the tiny room.

The trial itself was a farce. He was handed a two-and-a-half-year jail sentence for allegedly breaking the phrases of his probation in an previous, politically motivated case.

The courtroom theater was a sometimes Putinesque twist of Russia’s simply manipulated judicial course of. Navalny’s alleged probation violation got here as he lay incapacitated within the Berlin hospital recovering from the Novichok poisoning he and Western officers blame on the Kremlin.

Advertisement

If the courtroom course of in Putin’s Russia was a surreal circus, jail was to be its brutal twin the place the Russian chief hoped to interrupt Navalny’s will.

Journalists watch a live broadcast of the court hearing from the press room of the penal colony N2, on the first day of a new trial of Alexey Navalny, in the town of Pokrov on February 15, 2022.

However removed from defeated, and a lawyer by coaching, Navalny fought for his fundamental jail rights via authorized challenges.

After his sentencing, Navalny went on a starvation strike, complaining he was being disadvantaged of sleep by jail guards who stored waking him up. He started struggling well being points and demanded correct medical consideration.

Towards a backdrop of worldwide outrage, Navalny was moved to a jail hospital; in the meantime Moscow’s courts moved to have him declared a terrorist or extremist and Putin shut down his political operations throughout the nation.

In January 2022 Navalny appealed this designation, however after one other six months of judicial theater he misplaced.

Advertisement

And there have been extra costs. In March that 12 months, he was convicted of but extra trumped-up costs – contempt of courtroom and embezzlement – and he was transferred to Melekhovo’s most safety penal colony IK-6, a whole bunch of miles from Moscow.

At each flip, Navalny fought again, threatening in November 2022 to sue jail authorities for withholding winter boots, and, most not too long ago, mounting a authorized problem to know what jail medics have been injecting him with.

Putin’s efforts to interrupt him don’t have any bounds, Navalny has mentioned, describing his months in a punitive punishment cell as an try to “shut me up.” Typically, he has been made to share the tiny house with a convict who has severe hygiene points, he mentioned on Twitter.

Navalny says he noticed it for what it was: Putin’s callous use of individuals. “What particularly infuriates me is the instrumentalization of a residing particular person, turning him right into a strain software,” he mentioned.

However his struggling is paying off, in line with Pevechikh. “We’ve got had a really profitable 12 months by way of our group,” she mentioned. “We at the moment are one of the vital loud, anti-war, anti-war media that there’s out there.”

Advertisement

It’s the very fact Navalny returned to Russia that persuades folks he’s real, she mentioned. “The extent of threat that he takes on himself personally… could be very spectacular,” she mentioned. “And I might think about that our viewers recognises that.”

Dasha and Yulia Navalnaya attend the premiere of the film

Maybe due to this, however actually regardless of the greater than 700 days in jail, the place he stays topic to Putin’s vindictive whims, Navalny’s spirit appears sturdy.

At New 12 months he made mild of his inhumane therapy, saying on Instagram that he had put up Christmas decorations he’d been despatched in a letter from his household. When the guards took them down, he mentioned, “the temper remained.”

His crew posted a poignant photoshopped image of him along with his household – a means of holding alive their New 12 months custom of being collectively – and quoted Navalny as saying: “I can really feel the threads and wires going to my spouse, kids, dad and mom, brother, all of the folks closest to me.”

His New 12 months message to his many supporters is each stark and honest: “Thanks all a lot in your help this 12 months. It hasn’t stopped for a minute, not even for a second, and I’ve felt it.”

Advertisement

For what darkish horrors Putin might but select to go to on him, even the resilient Navalny will want all of the help he can get.

News

The uninsurable world: how the market fell behind on climate change

Published

on

The uninsurable world: how the market fell behind on climate change

Half a century ago, one of the world’s leading reinsurers published a paper on floods, referencing ancient diluvial stories such as the Mesopotamian epic of Gilgamesh, and urged better monitoring of “climatic variations”.

The 1970s paper by Munich Re, now the largest in the industry, pointed to global warming, polar melt and other environmental shifts as needing further study, “especially as — as far as we know — its conceivable impact on the long-range risk trend has hardly been examined to date”.

Today, the effect of climate change fuelling natural catastrophes such as floods and wildfires is evident, and insurance companies are scrambling.

The industry has been alert to the threat for decades. Yet executives have been spooked by the surge in extreme weather events, creating a property insurance crisis in some parts of the world. 

The sector has been rocked four years in a row as natural catastrophe losses topped $100bn. Even in 2023, a quiet year for hurricanes, there were a record-breaking 37 separate events costing at least $1bn in losses.

Advertisement

“Very clearly the [insurance industry’s] models are not working,” said Lindsay Keenan, EU co-ordinator at campaign group Insure Our Future. “I’m amazed how they have managed to blag the regulators with their rhetoric that ‘It’s all OK, we have models for that’ over the years, and still today.” 

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Reinsurers took heavy losses before sharply tightening their terms two years ago, putting extra pressure on primary insurers. US property and casualty insurers incurred more than $20bn in underwriting losses in both 2022 and 2023, according to rating agency AM Best. State Farm, the biggest US home insurer, suffered a net loss of more than $6bn in both years. It has since paused new business in California and will not renew tens of thousands of policies.

Veteran industry executives have voiced their concerns about the battle to keep up with climate effects.

William Berkley, the founder and executive chair of insurer WR Berkley Corporation, challenged fellow executives recently about their response to a changing climate that “doesn’t follow” historic patterns.

Advertisement

“It doesn’t seem like we are changing fast enough for the pace of change we have to adjust to,” Berkley told a gathering at New York University in April.

Insurance models “struggle to factor, with any precision, the probabilities that are accruing from climate change”, said Paula Jarzabkowski, an expert on risk at the University of Queensland. “I suspect that factoring climate risk into underwriting models is adding an uncertainty factor to premiums.”

Industry figures who spoke to the Financial Times identified a few reasons why the sector had fallen behind the curve.

A key issue was the one-year term of insurance policies — the question of whether to insure or reinsure a property or postcode for the coming year only — with little incentive to take a longer-term view. 

Adopting a conservative approach to climate threats also risked the loss of business or driving up capital requirements, some argued.

Advertisement

“The individual insurance companies look at this and say ‘there is very little advantage to us’ . . . being a leader in this area,” said one insurance expert, speaking privately.

This feeds into a second charge made by some: the risk models provided by the very biggest groups, Verisk and Moody’s RMS, were slow to reflect the effect that accelerating climate change was having on day-to-day losses.

Their priority was to gauge “peak perils”, such as hurricanes, that can cause calamitous losses that can bring the sector to its knees, rather than “secondary perils” such as wildfires and storms, which may have a lesser individual cost — until they begin to widen and cascade.

Big risk modellers reject the idea that they did not focus enough on secondary perils. Jay Guin, chief research officer for extreme event solutions at Verisk, said the company had “been offering models for secondary perils for over 20 years and has made significant investments”. 

But it was not until the 2017-18 wildfire losses in California that the whole industry began to take a “more critical look” at such events, Guin said. “We have improved most aspects of the model and have accounted for the impact of climate change.”

Advertisement

Executives describe an industry that is now recalibrating the threat from fires and floods. “Everyone has been surprised [by the surge in secondary perils]. It’s a fair criticism that we fell behind,” said Christian Mumenthaler, the departing chief executive of reinsurer Swiss Re.

He said it had been very difficult to predict how global warming would feed through to the cost of localised events, such as floods, which might affect one building on a street but not another.

Bar chart of Home insurance premiums ($bn) in state-backed schemes showing State insurers of last resort grow

Julie Serakos, head of the model product management team at Moody’s RMS, cited other complicating factors such as population growth in vulnerable regions and inflation in payouts. “There’s just more exposure to these types of events.”

Investment has now poured into new software tools and expertise that allow insurers to develop a longer-term view of climate effects.

Despite these efforts to catch up, however, the risk remains that the models will not fully reflect the catastrophic outcomes.

“As scientific evidence on climate change accumulates, you typically find the risks are higher in the new risk assessments compared to the previous one,” said Wim Thiery, a climate scientist at Vrije Universiteit Brussel.

Advertisement

Scientists have also been unnerved by an unprecedented stretch of record heat over land and sea over the past year. Global average temperatures surpassed the 1850-1900 average by 1.61C in the 12 months to April.

Members of the UK’s Institute and Faculty of Actuaries argued in a recent report with University of Exeter scientists that more attention should be paid to the risk that extreme climate scenarios could be made more likely by a series of atmospheric and physical feedback loops, including the collapse of ice sheets. These tipping points would add even more guesswork to the modelling.

“It’s product recall time for some of these models, things are moving more quickly [than predicted] . . . we need to move on to the next generation of climate scenarios,” said Sandy Trust, head of organisational risk at British fund manager M&G, and a co-author of the report.

Another issue is how the consensus models developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the UN body of scientists, are interpreted by the private sector.

Scientists and actuaries “are sailing past each other like ships in the night despite the fact they are using the same language of climate risk”, said Kris de Meyer, head of the UCL climate action unit. 

Advertisement

The scientific method focuses on the most likely outcomes within the full range of scenarios. The insurance world, conversely, aims to forecast the worst case, however unlikely, to avoid fluke events.

The response from the all-important reinsurance sector has been to draw back from covering secondary perils and to push up prices for primary insurers, who have passed them on to consumers. Greater numbers of property owners are relying on state-backed insurers as a last resort.

Most in the industry expect a continuation of that trend. “The reality is that climate change is essentially a slowburn,” said Steve Bowen, chief science officer at reinsurance broker Gallagher Re. “The general trend [in losses] is going to continue to go up.”

This is the second article in an FT series about the consequences of climate change on insurance. Read part one here.

Climate Capital

Where climate change meets business, markets and politics. Explore the FT’s coverage here.

Are you curious about the FT’s environmental sustainability commitments? Find out more about our science-based targets here

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

This year will likely be the last major D-Day anniversary with living veterans, so organizers are all-out | CNN

Published

on

This year will likely be the last major D-Day anniversary with living veterans, so organizers are all-out | CNN

Editor’s Note: As the 80th anniversary of D-Day nears, the global fight for democracy continues. CNN Anchor and Chief Washington Correspondent Jake Tapper speaks with World War II veterans and military generals about the worldwide erosion of democratic institutions. “D-Day: Why We Still Fight for Democracy” premieres Sunday, June 2 at 8 p.m. ET/PT on CNN.


Caen, France
CNN
 — 

At 99 years old, Jack Foy is considered the youngster among his group of friends that fought in World War II.

But their advanced age isn’t going to stop them from making the transatlantic journey to honor their fallen comrades on the 80th anniversary of D-Day.

On June 6, Foy – a survivor of the Battle of the Bulge – and his fellow American veterans will join dignitaries and heads of state from around the world to commemorate the approximately 160,000 Allied troops who, eight decades ago, carried out the largest seaborne invasion in human history.

Advertisement

Foy told CNN that he has been to several memorials in France since 2014. The emotional resonance of each trip grows stronger year after year, he said, because these veterans know each trip could be their last.

“We realize we’re getting to the end of our time,” Foy said.

They are not alone.

With major commemorations held every five years, organizers and government officials concede that this year’s event could be the last to involve living veterans, whose stories of the horrors of war have become particularly poignant given that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has brought a large-scale ground war back to Europe for the first time since 1945.

“We are perfectly aware that for these centenarians, this is maybe the last chance to return to the beaches where they landed, where they fought and where their brothers-in-arms fell,” said Gen. Michel Delion, the CEO of the French government agency in charge of the French commemoration efforts, Mission Liberation.

Advertisement

The various countries putting together the event are now planning what is expected to be the most extensive D-Day commemoration in history – both in terms of size and, crucially for elderly veterans, logistics.

Approximately 150 American veterans are expected to travel to Normandy – about two dozen of whom actually fought on D-Day – said Charles Djou, the secretary of the American Battle Monuments Commission (ABMC), the independent agency responsible for managing US military cemeteries and monuments overseas. The youngest is 96.

Fifteen Canadian veterans, including three or four that fought on D-Day, are traveling with the Canadian delegation, according to John Desrosiers, the director of international operations for Veterans Affairs Canada. Desrosiers said the youngest traveling with the group is 98 and the eldest are 104.

The British defense ministry said it expects more than 40 WWII veterans at the various events in Normandy.

US D-Day veterans attend an event at the Normandy American Cemetery and Memorial as part of the 79th anniversary D-Day celebrations on June 6, 2023.

Those vets will be joined by about 25 heads of state and government, including US President Joe Biden, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Russian President Vladimir Putin was not extended an invitation due to the war in Ukraine, while Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is planning on attending, according to a French presidential source.

With so many heads of state in town, the security measures in place are intense. A massive contingent of 12,000 security personnel will be deployed on June 6, the French Interior Ministry said.

Advertisement

Heavy travel restrictions put in place by French authorities will also effectively cut off the Norman coastline and the normally sleepy towns that dot it from the rest of the country.

Yet June 6 typically sees these elderly men criss-cross the region to hit a full day’s itinerary, including national ceremonies held at the American, British and Canadian cemeteries; the big international commemoration put on by France; and then, if they have the energy, more local events.

Most veterans also travel with an entire phalanx of medical personnel. The charity that organized Foy’s trip, the US-based Best Defense Foundation, is bringing three doctors and 10 nurses to accompany the 50 veterans they are flying over from the United States. Each veteran will travel with a personal caregiver – typically a family member or a friend.

Officials say they are going to incredible lengths to treat veterans like royalty – as they are feted by actual royals. King Charles III will be there on June 6 – his first overseas trip since being diagnosed with cancer – alongside Queen Camilla and Prince William, Buckingham Palace said. Representatives from the royal families of Belgium, Monaco, the Netherlands and Norway are also expected to attend.

Delion’s team has been holding rehearsals and timing wheelchair runs for the French-led international ceremony. They are also considering having veterans enter at the same time as heads of states and other dignitaries to reduce their waiting time.

Advertisement

American and Canadian organizers told CNN that they will seat veterans last at their respective national ceremonies to keep them comfortable. The general public at the American event, for example, may need to be seated about an hour in advance due to security precautions.

“We take care of the veterans who served and made the enormous sacrifices that they did in the Second World War,” said Djou.

British D-Day veteran Tom Schaffer (left), and companion John Pinkerton study the names on the British Normandy Memorial at Ver-sur-Mer in France ahead of the 79th anniversary of the D-Day landings in June 2023. Schaffer passed away in March 2024, at the age of 97.

After being postponed 24 hours due to bad weather, D-Day began shortly after midnight on June 6, 1944, when paratroopers dropped into German-occupied France to lay the groundwork for the incoming invasion. Allied planes and warships began their bombardment at about 6:30 a.m., with troops hitting the beaches shortly after. They landed on a stretch of coastline 50 miles long organized into five beaches codenamed Gold, Juno, Omaha, Sword and Utah. The Americans were responsible for Omaha and Utah. The British led the assault on Gold and Sword, while the Canadians handled Juno.

Though 4,414 Allied troops died that day and it would take more than a month to achieve one of D-Day’s main objectives – liberating the strategically important city of Caen – the landings were considered a success. Allied troops had successfully made it onshore in France; it was the beginning of the end for Hitler and Nazi Germany.

American troops march up from Omaha Beach on June 18, 1944.

The sheer drama of the event has, for decades, captured the American public imagination, because of both the magnitude of the invasion and the fact that it was a “digestible” turning point in the war, according to Ben Brands, a military historian at the ABMC.

“World War II, especially in Europe, becomes this ongoing battle from basically the moment troops land on the beaches of D-Day until Germany ultimately surrenders. The human mind needs to cut that up into digestible stories, and D-Day is a really powerful, discrete event that is so critical for everything that comes after,” Brands said. “There’s just so many powerful stories that come out of D-Day.”

US military personnel place US and French flags next to the graves of fallen soldiers at the Normandy American Cemetery on June 5, 2023 in Colleville-sur-Mer, France.

As time has passed, veterans have played a crucial role in passing down the stories of D-Day. Their gripping, visceral first-hand accounts are better teachers of history than any textbook.

But just a fraction of the soldiers who lived through D-Day are still alive.

Advertisement

Of the 16.4 million Americans who served in the military during WWII, fewer than 100,000 are expected to still be alive by the end of the year, according to statistics from the US Department of Veterans Affairs. In Canada, there were just 9,297 living Canadian veterans who had served in either WWII or the Korean War as of March 31, 2023, according to the most recent statistics available from Veterans Affairs Canada. The British defense ministry said it does not keep veteran numbers on hand.

It’s unclear what the average age of a WWII veteran is. Given that the median age for an American WWII veteran in June 2020 was 93, according to US Census figures at the time, most surviving vets from Allied forces are likely to now be at least in their late-nineties. By the 85th anniversary in 2029, those who are still living will almost certainly be in triple digits.

“People are realizing this generation is passing and they’re passing rapidly now, and it’s important to keep their stories alive, to keep the memories of those who died and are buried at Normandy, but also those who fought and survived because they can no longer be with us for that much longer to tell these stories,” Brands said.

“The 80th will be a very powerful event.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Ministers threaten to bring down Israeli government over ‘reckless’ Gaza ceasefire plan

Published

on

Ministers threaten to bring down Israeli government over ‘reckless’ Gaza ceasefire plan

Unlock the US Election Countdown newsletter for free

Right-wing allies of Benjamin Netanyahu have rejected a US-brokered ceasefire proposal to end the war in Gaza as “total surrender” to Hamas, threatening to bring down the Israeli government if it is enacted.

US President Joe Biden unveiled the contours of a deal on Friday in which the fighting would be halted and Israeli hostages held in Gaza released. The ultimate goal, Biden said, would be an end to the conflict.

After the end of the Sabbath on Saturday night, two senior far-right ministers in Netanyahu’s ruling coalition warned the long-serving premier against accepting the “reckless” deal and urged him to continue the war until the “complete elimination” of Hamas.

Advertisement

The proposal would be “a victory for terrorism and a security danger to the State of Israel,” National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir said in a statement.

“Agreeing to such a deal is not total victory — but total defeat,” he added, threatening to “dissolve the government”.

Bezalel Smotrich, finance minister, said he would not be part of a government that agreed to “end the war without destroying Hamas and returning all the hostages”. He criticised proposals to withdraw the Israeli military from Gaza, release Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails, and return displaced Gazans to their homes in the north of the shattered enclave.

“We demand the continuation of the fighting until the destruction of Hamas and the return of all the hostages,” he said.

The US, along with Egypt and Qatar, issued a joint statement on Saturday calling on both Hamas and Israel to finalise the terms of the deal as Biden had outlined. All three states have for months attempted to broker an agreement that would halt the fighting in Gaza, but talks have stalled over fundamental gaps between the two warring parties — in particular over whether any ceasefire would be permanent.

Advertisement

In their statement, the three countries added that the proposal “will bring immediate relief both to the long-suffering people of Gaza as well as the long-suffering hostages and their families. This deal offers a road map for a permanent ceasefire and ending the crisis.”

According to Biden, the three-phase agreement would begin with a “full and complete ceasefire” over six weeks, including the withdrawal of Israeli forces from “densely populated” areas of Gaza, and the return of some hostages, including Americans, alongside the release of some Palestinian prisoners.

A second phase would involve the release of all hostages and a “permanent cessation of hostilities” combined with a full withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza.

The third phase would relate to the “reconstruction” of Gaza, designed to lead to broader stabilisation in the Middle East.

Netanyahu’s office have issued two non-committal statements, saying that “Israel’s conditions for ending the war have not changed: the destruction of Hamas’s military and governing capabilities, the freeing of all hostages and ensuring that Gaza no longer poses a threat to Israel.”

Advertisement

Netanyahu’s office added that it would “insist these conditions are met before a permanent ceasefire is put in place. The notion that Israel will agree to a permanent ceasefire before these conditions are fulfilled is a non-starter.”

Hamas said in a statement that it “positively views” Biden’s speech and that it was ready to deal “in a constructive manner with any proposal that is based on a permanent ceasefire and the full withdrawal [of Israeli forces] from the Gaza Strip, the reconstruction [of Gaza], and the return of displaced people to their homes, along with the completion of a genuine prisoner swap deal”, as long as Israel “clearly announces commitment to such a deal”.

With pressure mounting within Netanyahu’s own coalition and right-wing base against the ceasefire proposal, opposition leader Yair Lapid on Saturday again offered to provide a “safety net” to the ruling coalition in the event that Ben-Gvir and Smotrich pulled out their parties.

“The Israeli government cannot ignore President Biden’s significant speech. There is a deal on the table and it needs to be done,” Lapid wrote on X.

Tens of thousands of Israelis converged in central Tel Aviv on Saturday night in the weekly demonstration for the release of the Israeli hostages seized by Hamas during its October 7 attack that triggered the war. Some 125 are still being held, with about a third believed by Israeli officials to be dead.

Advertisement

“Yes to the Netanyahu Deal! Bring them home now!” they yelled.

Continue Reading

Trending