Connect with us

News

Boom in US penny stock trading prompts warnings of frothy markets

Published

on

Boom in US penny stock trading prompts warnings of frothy markets

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

A scrap metal merchant and an electric vehicle maker that has sold just four cars top the list of so-called “penny” stocks that are out-trading the likes of Tesla and Apple, prompting some analysts to warn that markets are becoming overheated.

Seven of the top 10 most traded US equities in May, as measured by the number of shares bought and sold, are penny stocks worth less than $1, according to Cboe Global Markets. None of the companies are profitable.

The huge volumes in so many little-known stocks suggest a renewed appetite among retail investors for cheap names in which they believe they can quickly make a lot of money.

Advertisement

“When markets get frothy, the speculative froth often hits penny stocks as well — this is a classic sign of market peaks,” said James Angel, a finance professor at Georgetown University.

“Penny stocks tend to be extremely volatile, so you can make or lose a ton of money very quickly,” he added. “That appeals to the speculative urge.”

The frenetic trading comes after a strong rally in US blue-chips over the past seven months, with tech stocks reaching a new record high this week, although on Friday the benchmark S&P 500 index recovered from early lows, but still suffered its first weekly decline in more than a month.

Scrap metal merchant Greenwave Technology Solutions, whose website proclaims “scrap is the new precious metal”, topped the leaderboard for May. It has 588mn shares outstanding, and a daily average of 510mn shares were traded during the month, according to Cboe Global Markets data.

Over that time, its market capitalisation swung between $4mn and $159mn and the value of its shares from 4 cents to 16 cents. The company did not respond to a request for comment.

Advertisement

The only large-cap company to make the top 10 most-traded was Tesla, a regular favourite among active traders. 

While, in value terms, trading in penny stocks is a tiny fraction of the turnover of mega-caps, investors’ increased interest has coincided with a resurgence in so-called “meme” stocks such as retailer GameStop and cinema chain AMC, which benefited from frenzied retail investor interest in 2021. 

AMC was the sixth most-traded US stock in May with volumes more than 7 times their recent average.

“Penny stocks are not the same as the meme stock phenomenon, but let’s say they rhyme. It’s people willing to put fundamentals aside and chase returns,” said Steve Sosnick, chief market strategist at retail broker Interactive Brokers. 

Sosnick’s own weekly scan of the most-traded stocks on Interactive Brokers’ platform has recently thrown up several lesser-known microcap companies.

Advertisement

“It’s emblematic of what I consider to have become a very frothy market,” he added.

Stocks that trade under $1 for a certain period are at risk of being delisted by exchanges and, for that reason, institutional investors tend not to touch them.

The rise in volumes has reawakened concerns about the impact of their financing methods on shareholders as well as the rules that allow them to remain listed. 

Several of the most traded stocks by volume in May have sold new shares recently. The deals, typically in the form of bonds that convert into stock at a discount to the market price, dilute existing shareholders and swell trading volumes when the new shares are resold, which often happens quickly.

Electric vehicle maker Faraday Future Intelligent Electric was the second-most-traded stock in May. Its 2023 accounts, filed this week after a delay due to staffing issues, showed sales of four cars and leases for a further six since a long-delayed launch last year. They also contained a warning that “it will likely file for bankruptcy protection if it is unable to access additional capital”.

Advertisement

Several posts on social media platform Reddit focused on the wild swings revealed in Faraday’s share count. This has soared from 57mn in November to 1.4bn by February, when it did a so-called “reverse split”, swapping three existing shares for one new one. Its latest filing shows 440mn shares outstanding.

Reverse splits have become a common tool for sub-dollar companies as a way of boosting share prices and warding off the threat of delisting. There are 471 companies currently with shares trading under $1 in the US, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence data, up from 125 a year ago.

More than 70 reverse splits have been announced so far this year, according to data provider Wall Street Horizon. The number of such share swaps roughly doubled in 2023 to 219 compared with the previous year despite a major rally in stock markets after a tough 2022.

Greenwave announced a 1-for-150 reverse split this week, effective from Monday. Faraday Future, which is still behind with its financial filings and whose shares have halved since it published its 2023 accounts, has appealed against a delisting decision by Nasdaq.

“The company expects its securities to continue to trade on Nasdaq in the normal course during the pendency of the hearing process,” it told the Financial Times.

Advertisement

News

Video: Rob Reiner and His Wife Are Found Dead in Their Los Angeles Home

Published

on

Video: Rob Reiner and His Wife Are Found Dead in Their Los Angeles Home

new video loaded: Rob Reiner and His Wife Are Found Dead in Their Los Angeles Home

transcript

transcript

Rob Reiner and His Wife Are Found Dead in Their Los Angeles Home

The Los Angeles Police Department was investigating what it described as “an apparent homicide” after the director Rob Reiner and his wife, Michele, were found dead in their home.

“One louder.” “Why don’t you just make 10 louder and make 10 be the top number and make that a little louder?”

Advertisement
The Los Angeles Police Department was investigating what it described as “an apparent homicide” after the director Rob Reiner and his wife, Michele, were found dead in their home.

By Axel Boada

December 15, 2025

Continue Reading

News

BBC Verify: Videos show impact of mass drone attacks launched by Ukraine and Russia

Published

on

BBC Verify:  Videos show impact of mass drone attacks launched by Ukraine and Russia

How has the UK government performed against its key pledges?published at 11:18 GMT

Ben Chu
BBC Verify policy and analysis correspondent

Around a year ago Prime Minister Keir Starmer launched his “Plan for Change” setting out targets he said would be met by the end of this Parliament in 2029.

Advertisement

So ahead of Starmer being questioned by senior MPs on the House of Commons Liaison Committee this afternoon, I’ve taken a look at how the government has been performing on three key goals.

House building

The government said it would deliver 1.5 million net additional homes in England over the parliament.

That would imply around 300,000 a year on average, but we’re currently running at just over 200,000 a year.

Ministers say they are going to ramp up to the 1.5 million target in the later years of the parliament – however, the delivery rate so far is down on the final years of the last Conservative government.

Advertisement

Health

The government has promised that 92% of patients in England will be seen within 18 weeks.

At the moment around 62% are – but there are signs of a slight pick up over the past year.

Living standards

The government pledged to grow real household disposable income per person – roughly what’s left after taxes, benefits and inflation.

Advertisement

There has been some movement on this measure with the Office for Budget Responsibility forecasting 0.5% growth in living standards on average a year.

However that would still make it the second weakest Parliament since the 1970s. The worst was under the previous Conservative government between 2019 and 2024 when living standards declined.

Continue Reading

News

Bill and Hillary Clinton’s Stance on Epstein Testimony Nov. 3

Published

on

Bill and Hillary Clinton’s Stance on Epstein Testimony Nov. 3

WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
Hon. James Comer
Hon. Robert Garcia November 3, 2025 Page 2

compel Attorney General Bondi to release what you have stated is a large trove of unseen files, which the public to date is still waiting to see released.

Your October 22 letter does not provide a persuasive rationale for why deposing the Clintons is required to fulfill the mandate of your investigation, particularly when what little information they have may be efficiently obtained in writing.

You state that your investigation into the “mismanagement” of the Epstein and Maxwell investigations and prosecutions requires the depositions of three individuals: former President Clinton, former Secretary of State Clinton, and former Attorney General William Barr – who was serving in the first Trump Administration when Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide in federal custody. Compounding this inexplicable choice of deponents, you also have chosen not to depose the dozens of individuals whose links to Mr. Epstein have been publicly documented.

My clients have been private citizens for the last 24 and 12 years, respectively. President Clinton’s term ended six (6) years before allegations surfaced against Mr. Epstein. Former Secretary of State Clinton’s position was in no way related to law enforcement and is completely afield of any aspect of the Epstein matter. While neither of my clients have anything to offer for the stated purposes of the Committee’s investigation, subpoenaing former Secretary Clinton is on its face both purposeless and harassing. I set forth in my October 6 letter the facts that she did not know Epstein, did not travel with him, and had no dealings with him. Indeed, when I met with your staff to learn your basis for including former Secretary Clinton, none was given beyond wanting to ask if she had ever spoken with her husband about this matter. Setting aside the plainly relevant consideration of marital privilege, this is an entirely pretextual basis for compelling former Secretary Clinton to appear personally in this matter.

It is incumbent on the Committee to address the most basic questions regarding the basis for singling out the Clintons, particularly when there is no obvious or apparent rationale for it, given the mandate of the Committee’s investigation. Your October 22 letter does not provide such a justification. And your previous statements, belied by the facts, that President Clinton is a “prime suspect” (for something) because of visits to Epstein’s island betokens bias, not fairness. You said, on August 11:

“Everybody in America wants to know what went on in Epstein Island, and we’ve all heard reports that Bill Clinton was a frequent visitor there, so he’s a prime suspect to be deposed by the House Oversight Committee.”

“1

Regrettably, such statements are not the words of an impartial and dispassionate factfinder. In fact, President Clinton has never visited Epstein’s island. He has repeatedly stated that, the Secret Service has corroborated that denial, Ghislaine Maxwell’s recent testimony to Deputy Attorney General Blanche reconfirmed this, as did the late Virginia Roberts Giuffre in her

Fields, “Comer: Bill Clinton ‘Prime Suspect’ in Epstein Investigation,” The Hill (Aug. 12, 2025).

Continue Reading

Trending