Connect with us

News

‘Birtherism’ to the ‘Big Lie’: Inside Obama’s fight to counter disinformation

Published

on

‘Birtherism’ to the ‘Big Lie’: Inside Obama’s fight to counter disinformation

Obama’s effort has been sweeping, say the previous President’s confidants and outdoors advisers with expertise within the tech business, with Obama convening conferences and conversations with lecturers, activists, researchers, tech sector leaders, media executives, former authorities officers and former regulators. Individuals who have met with the previous President describe him as gripped by the problem, exhibiting as much as conferences with handwritten notes and questions and infrequently referring to studying he has carried out on the subject, together with reviews by the RAND Company and the Aspen Institute, and a analysis examine on partisan media by David Broockman and Joshua Kalla.

Eric Schultz, an Obama adviser, mentioned the previous President views disinformation as a “by means of line for the entire challenges we face proper now,” together with the pandemic, local weather change and racial injustice. And for Obama, Schultz added, the “arc of this situation additionally tracks the arc of his public life” — whereas social media helped get Obama elected in 2008, the misinformation that unfold on completely different platforms additionally accelerated throughout his time in workplace.

Obama made this focus public on Wednesday when he headlined a dialog on disinformation at a convention sponsored by the College of Chicago’s Institute of Politics and The Atlantic journal. He’ll put a finer level on the subject later within the month when he delivers a keynote speech throughout a convention at Stanford College.

“It’s troublesome for me to see how we win the competition of concepts if the truth is we aren’t in a position to agree on a baseline of acts that enable {the marketplace} of concepts to work,” Obama mentioned Wednesday, lamenting that whereas attendees had entry to all the data they wished on their telephones, there have been nonetheless giant swaths of Individuals who consider that the 2020 election was stolen from Trump and that the coronavirus vaccine was not one thing they wanted.

Obama admitted that he “grappled with so much” throughout his presidency, together with “the diploma with which data, disinformation was being weaponized.” However recalling his time in workplace, he mentioned he and his employees “underestimated the diploma to which democracies have been as weak to (disinformation) as they have been, together with ours.” On baseless questions on the place he was born, he mentioned, “That wasn’t an instance of individuals being misinformed. There was an agenda behind that promotion of what was clearly a false truth.”

Advertisement

Obama informed the viewers Wednesday that he might “draw a direct line” from his time on the marketing campaign path to the proliferation of lies about his hometown and the falsehood that his signature well being care legislation was establishing “dying panels” for older Individuals, as 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin had put it.

“There was what has been known as reality decay. There was an erosion of what was thought-about acceptable to say within the press, interval. That’s all pre-social media,” he mentioned. “After which when social media hits, then I feel you noticed it unfold and speed up. … I feel it was really in my second time period that you just begin to see now simply dangerous data, however you additionally begin to see an acceleration of misinformation.”

“And by 2016, that’s when, properly, we all know what occurred,” Obama mentioned, trailing off, acknowledging what everybody within the room knew — the identical man who pushed the birther conspiracy principle was elected as his successor.
Obama argued that he views disinformation as “totally completely different from data that’s inconvenient,” pointing to his “in the event you like your well being care plan, you may maintain it” falsehood throughout the battle over his sweeping well being care legislation — which earned him the Politifact “Lie of the Yr” in 2013 — for instance of the latter. Though Obama defended the intention behind the road, he mentioned he “could not actually complain about folks criticizing me for it” and mentioned it was completely different than current lies concerning the 2020 election as a result of him saying it was “not a menace to democracy” and “was not supposed to in some way subvert the Democratic course of.”

“In a democracy there are going to be, within the regular course of debate, we are going to contest what has been mentioned, what has been proposed, what has been delivered and there can be some play within the joints of how we interpret stuff,” Obama mentioned, including that lies concerning the election and different points went far past that.

‘He understands this world’

Obama, now a 60-year-old, grey haired former politician, has absolutely embraced the technological intricacies of the disinformation situation, in line with an out of doors adviser who has labored within the tech business, principally as a result of the previous President is “naturally type of a geek.”

Advertisement

“It isn’t as if it is like that is some new-fangled, whatchamacallit that you’ll by no means see on my garden or no matter,” the adviser informed CNN. “He understands this world.”

The adviser mentioned Obama has extra time to concentrate on the problem as a result of “now he has the flexibility to speak to a variety of specialists with out it being an official operate of presidency,” and so he has convened a variety of individuals to take a look at the issue.

And that has given him, this individual mentioned, not only a higher understanding of the way in which disinformation has personally affected his life and profession but in addition a deep concern that the unfold of disinformation will result in a type of “political nihilism,” the place many Individuals do not know what to consider and simply take a look at from politics all collectively.

“That’s the actual nemesis and the actual atmosphere that disinformation creates and permits autocracy to flourish,” the surface adviser mentioned. “Birtherism is clearly part of that story, however the stakes have, in some methods, modified so dramatically since then, that it is change into a part of the context of democracy itself.”

On reflection, “birtherism”, or the idea that Obama was not born in Hawaii, was a warning of what was to come back, the darkish and dystopian route American political discourse was about to take.

“Birtherism” and the “Huge Lie” undermining the 2020 election are in no way dissimilar. Each are viral baseless conspiracy theories, with prejudicial undertones, championed by Trump to interact an enthusiastic base and to sow seeds of doubt within the wider inhabitants.

Advertisement

The birther conspiracy principle first emerged someday throughout the first decade of the century — Obama mentioned it had been pushed as early as his Senate race in Illinois. It is exact genesis is unclear and disputed.

Come 2011, nonetheless, Trump had change into a standard-bearer of the birther motion, launching a marketing campaign for Obama to launch his long-form delivery certificates.

“He does not have a delivery certificates. He might have one, however there’s one thing on that, perhaps faith, perhaps it says he’s a Muslim,” Trump informed Fox in 2011.

Obama did have a long-form delivery certificates, and the White Home launched it. Obama later went on to roast Trump on the White Home Correspondents’ Affiliation dinner that 12 months.

Lee Foster, an knowledgeable in monitoring disinformation and senior vice chairman at Alethea Group, informed CNN that the birther conspiracy principle was “merely a precursor to the barrage of falsehoods we discover ourselves dealing with in right this moment’s political atmosphere.”

Foster, who has been concerned in exposing international disinformation campaigns focusing on america by means of social media, mentioned that it is very important keep in mind that this goes past the web.

Why Ukraine war misinformation is so hard to police

“Huge Tech performs a job on this, however so do our media establishments, our political events and, frankly, all of us. It requires all of us to deal with,” he mentioned.

Regardless of Obama’s eager curiosity, solutions about the easiest way to counter disinformation have proved extra elusive.

Advertisement

Throughout his remarks Wednesday, Obama alluded to the necessity for transparency about social media algorithms that decide what folks see of their on-line feeds and the problem of anonymity on social media websites.

He mentioned additionally expressed help for toughening rules on social media firms. He mentioned that whereas he’s not for “totally eliminating” Part 230, a rule that protects the businesses’ capability to average content material on their web site as they see match, he questioned whether or not the protections have been truthful for “paid promoting that’s microtargeting sure teams. … That may be actually damaging.”

And Obama considerably mockingly responded to protests from social media firms, who say their algorithms and product design include proprietary data that may’t be proven to regulators or the general public.

“I do not know precisely how the inspections on meat are carried out. And if any individual says now we have a proprietary approach to maintain our meat clear, that is high quality, take it up with the meat inspector,” he mentioned sarcastically. “This notion that now we have to protect this as a result of in some way now we have proprietary pursuits, that’s mistaken.”

News

Space engine start-up in talks for new capital after funding crunch

Published

on

Space engine start-up in talks for new capital after funding crunch

A British technology start-up which had promised to build the world’s first space plane is in last-ditch talks to secure new financing after two of its backers wrote down the value of their investment.

Reaction Engines, which was founded in 1989, is in detailed talks with the UAE-backed Strategic Development Fund (SDF), one of its existing shareholders, about a new injection of capital, according to two people familiar with the situation. The SDF led a £40mn funding round in January last year. 

The British start-up is also backed by several aerospace giants, including BAE Systems and Rolls-Royce, as well as financial investors Artemis and Schroders.

Reaction has previously raised more than £150mn and grew its commercial revenues by more than 400 per cent last year. The company, however, warned earlier this year that it would need to raise additional financing. It has this weekend lined up PwC, the accountancy firm, to act as administrator if the funding talks collapse.

Sky News first reported that PwC had been put on standby. The accountancy firm, which has not yet been formally appointed, declined to comment on Saturday. Reaction also declined to comment. 

Advertisement

Other existing investors are monitoring the situation, said one of the people close to the talks. 

Artemis and Schroders both announced last week that they had significantly written down the value of their stakes in Reaction. Artemis cut the value of its 2.3 per cent holding by 75 per cent. Artemis Alpha Trust, the fund that manages the London-based fund manager’s stake, now values it at £1.2mn, compared with £6.4mn in April. 

Reaction has in recent years focused on developing a hybrid jet and rocket engine, known as Sabre. The innovative engine was originally planned to power Skylon, a space aircraft also designed by Reaction.

Key to Sabre’s development is Reaction’s groundbreaking pre-cooling technology which prevents engines from overheating and could lead to hypersonic space planes. The company is part of a UK-led military project aiming to make hypersonic flight a reality. At hypersonic speeds, the temperature generated inside a conventional gas turbine would start to melt components unless they were cooled in some way.

More recently the company has focused its attention on developing nearer-term aerospace and commercial applications for its pre-cooling technology. It signed an agreement with US industrial group Honeywell to collaborate on the development of thermal management technologies to help reduce aircraft emissions. 

Advertisement

Reaction is chaired by Philip Dunne, a former UK defence minister. It has been led by Mark Thomas, who was previously at Rolls-Royce. 

Continue Reading

News

Former US President Trump hints at support for Florida ballot measure legalising recreational marijuana – Times of India

Published

on

Former US President Trump hints at support for Florida ballot measure legalising recreational marijuana – Times of India
Former President Trump has suggested he might support a Florida ballot measure to legalise recreational marijuana for adults, known as Amendment 3, reported the Hill.
Trump, a Florida resident, emphasised the importance of this measure being appropriately managed by the state Legislature to avoid public consumption issues.
Emphasis on responsible legislation
“In Florida, like so many other States that have already given their approval, personal amounts of marijuana will be legalised for adults with Amendment 3,” Trump said in a post on his Truth Social site.“Whether people like it or not, this will happen through the approval of the Voters, so it should be done correctly.”

Trump avoided stating his voting intention or openly backing marijuana legalisation but stressed that responsible legislation is necessary to avoid public nuisances. He pointed to the need for laws that prevent marijuana use in public areas to keep public spaces free from the smell of marijuana, similar to the issues observed in other cities.
“The state Legislature needs to responsibly create laws that prohibit marijuana consumption in public spaces so we do not smell marijuana everywhere we go, like we do in many of the Democrat-run Cities,” said Trump.
Concerns over inconsistent marijuana laws
He also highlighted the inconsistency of criminalising marijuana possession in Florida when it is legal in many other states. Trump emphasised that law enforcement resources and lives should not be wasted on arresting adults for possessing small amounts of marijuana.
“We do not need to ruin lives & waste Taxpayer Dollars arresting adults with personal amounts of it on them, and no one should grieve a loved one because they died from fentanyl-laced marijuana,” he added.
Impact on voter mobilisation and Republican division
Trump’s comments follow recent efforts by Democrats to attract younger voters in Florida, focusing on issues like abortion and marijuana legalisation. These issues have mobilised younger voters in other regions, as seen in Ohio, and Democrats hope for a similar impact in Florida.
Democrats are targeting the fall ballot measures, aiming to increase voter turnout and gain the support of younger voters, a group with which Trump has faced challenges.
Earlier in the year, the Department of Justice made a significant move toward reclassifying marijuana as a less dangerous drug. If this reclassification is approved, marijuana will be downgraded to a Schedule III drug.
Despite the trend toward normalisation and Trump’s comments, some Republicans remain opposed to legalising recreational marijuana. Sen Rick Scott has publicly stated his intention to vote against the measure. He cited personal family experience with addiction as a key reason for his opposition.
“My brother, who died at 67 in April, began smoking marijuana as a teenager and led a life of addiction,” Scott said.

Continue Reading

News

Big Oil calls on Kamala Harris to come clean on her energy and climate plans

Published

on

Big Oil calls on Kamala Harris to come clean on her energy and climate plans

Unlock the US Election Countdown newsletter for free

The US oil industry and Republicans are demanding Kamala Harris clarify her energy and climate policy, as the Democratic candidate tries to please her progressive base without alienating voters in shale areas like Pennsylvania, a crucial swing state.

On Thursday, the vice-president said she no longer supported a ban on fracking, the technology that unleashed the shale revolution. But Harris’s reversal has not quelled attacks from Donald Trump or US executives that she would damage the country’s oil and gas sector.

The heads of the US’s two biggest oil lobby groups said the Democratic candidate must also say whether she would keep or end a pause on federal approvals for new liquefied natural gas plants, and whether she supported curbs on drilling imposed by the Biden administration.

Advertisement

“Based on what we know of her past positions, the bills that she has sponsored, and her past statements she’s taken a pretty aggressively anti-energy and anti-oil and gas industry stand,” said Anne Bradbury, head of the American Exploration and Production Council.

“These are significant and major policy questions that impact every American family and business, and which voters deserve to understand better when making their choice in November,” she said.

Mike Sommers, chief executive of the American Petroleum Institute, Big Oil’s most powerful lobby group, said Harris should say whether she would stick with Biden administration policies that had unleashed “a regulatory onslaught the likes of which this industry has never seen”.

Trump, the Republican candidate, has accused Harris of plotting a “war on American energy” and has repeatedly blamed her and President Joe Biden for high fuel costs in recent years.

On Thursday, he vowed to scrap Biden administration policies that “distort energy markets”. The former president has called climate change a hoax and his advisers have said he would gut Biden’s signature climate legislation, the Inflation Reduction Act.

Advertisement

The debate over Harris’s energy policy comes as she and Trump court blue-collar workers in Pennsylvania, a huge shale gas producer that employs 72,000 workers — a potentially decisive voting group in a state Biden won narrowly in 2020.

Harris said in 2019 that she supported a fracking ban but told CNN on Thursday she had ditched that position and the US could have “a thriving clean energy economy without banning fracking”.

US oil and gas production has reached a record high under Biden, even as clean energy capacity has expanded rapidly.

But gas executives in particular have been alarmed at a federal pause on building new LNG export plants, which supply customers from Europe to Asia, saying the policy will stymie further US shale output.

Toby Rice, chief executive of Pennsylvania-based EQT, the US’s largest natural gas producer, said Harris should lift the restrictions, which he argued would compromise energy security.

Advertisement

“Ignoring her anti-fracking statement four years ago for a second, can we talk about the recent LNG Pause that was put in place this year?”, he said. “This is a policy that has received massive criticism from all sides — our allies, industry and environmental champions . . . a step backwards for climate and American energy security.”

While Biden put climate at the centre of his and Harris’s 2020 White House campaign, Harris has been largely silent, and made only a passing reference to climate change in her speech at the Democratic convention.

“It looks like the Harris campaign has concluded that it’s safer to avoid antagonising producers or climate activists by skirting these issues entirely,” said Kevin Book, managing director of ClearView Energy Partners.

Climate-focused voters are less vexed than energy executives by the lack of explicit policy from Harris.

“Let’s be clear: the most important climate policy right now is defeating Donald Trump in November,” said Cassidy DiPaola of Fossil Free Media, a non-profit organisation. “All the wonky policy details in the world won’t matter if climate deniers control the White House.”

Advertisement

Last week the political arms of the League of Conservation Voters, Climate Power and the Environmental Defense Fund unveiled a $55mn advertising campaign backing Harris in swing states, focused on economic rather than climate issues.

In contrast, Trump has courted oil bosses who are backing his pledge to slash regulation and scrap clean energy subsidies. His campaign received nearly $14mn from the industry in June, according to OpenSecrets, almost double his oil haul in May.

Additional reporting by Sam Learner

Climate Capital

Where climate change meets business, markets and politics. Explore the FT’s coverage here.

Are you curious about the FT’s environmental sustainability commitments? Find out more about our science-based targets here

Advertisement

   

Continue Reading

Trending