Connect with us

News

Big Tech attacks tough EU measures aimed at tackling its market power

Published

on

Big Tech attacks tough EU measures aimed at tackling its market power

The world’s largest know-how corporations have attacked harder than anticipated measures which have been unveiled inside a landmark EU legislation aimed toward reining of their market energy.

Massive Tech corporations resembling Fb and Amazon will likely be compelled to pay as much as 20 per cent of world revenues for repeat offences and even threat being damaged up, in the event that they breach the brand new Digital Markets Act as soon as it comes into pressure in October.

These measures, revealed late on Thursday night time, characterize stiffer sanctions for tech teams than that they had hoped, in laws that represents the most important overhaul of the legal guidelines governing their operations in additional than 20 years.

Apple stated the brand new legislation “will create pointless privateness and safety vulnerabilities for our customers whereas others will prohibit us from charging for mental property through which we make investments an excellent deal”. 

Google stated: “We’re frightened that a few of these guidelines may scale back innovation and the selection obtainable to Europeans.”

Advertisement

Because the Monetary Instances reported earlier this week, the EU confirmed that the laws would goal corporations which have a market capitalisation of at the very least €75bn and run one core on-line “platform” service resembling a social community or internet browser.

The DMA will pressure so-called gatekeepers to open up their platforms to rivals, resembling by forcing the businesses to make sure their providers are “interoperable”. This implies, as an example, that customers of Fb’s WhatsApp service will have the ability to ship messages on to communications apps created by smaller rivals.

Legislators within the EU defended the brand new guidelines after years of criticism that present antitrust mechanisms have been too sluggish and ineffective.

Cedric O, the French minister for the digital economic system and a central determine within the drafting of the laws, stated: “The safety argument has all the time been and can all the time be the argument of dominant corporations to hamper innovation and extra competitors.”

He stated different sectors, resembling banking and vitality, had expressed comparable issues about damaging innovation after they have been being regulated, however careworn the DMA would obtain the alternative. “Extra competitors fosters extra innovation and that is exactly what is going to occur,” he stated. “It’s excellent information for European innovators and start-ups.”

Advertisement

These corporations that repeatedly broke the legislation may even discover themselves banned from buying corporations for a short lived interval underneath the brand new laws. Expertise companies may even be banned from rating their very own providers on the expense of rivals and there may even be limits on the usage of customers’ knowledge.

Margrethe Vestager, the EU’s government vice-president in command of digital coverage, stated the brand new legislation “reveals the willingness for democracy to say ‘we are going to rein this in. We are going to be sure that the market is open and contestable’.”

Thierry Breton, the French commissioner in command of the inner market, added: “It was the wild west. That’s now not the case. We’re taking again management.”

A deal on the DMA got here hours earlier than the US and the EU introduced a provisional deal on privateness necessities for tech corporations sending knowledge throughout borders.

US President Joe Biden stated the framework underscored a shared dedication to privateness, knowledge safety and the rule of legislation, including that it could enable the European Fee to as soon as once more authorise transatlantic knowledge flows that assist facilitate $7.1tn in financial relationships with the EU.

Advertisement

Further reporting by Sam Fleming in Brussels

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Nasa may ask SpaceX to retrieve astronauts stuck at space station

Published

on

Nasa may ask SpaceX to retrieve astronauts stuck at space station

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Nasa said on Wednesday it is considering tapping SpaceX to shuttle two astronauts back to Earth from the International Space Station following technical difficulties with the Boeing CST-100 Starliner spacecraft they took to get there.

Astronauts Sunita Williams and Barry Wilmore, who were supposed to return to Earth nearly two months ago, may now stay at the station until February. SpaceX had a mission to the space station planned for later this month to deliver crew and supplies, but the US space agency has now pushed it back until September to weigh whether it should bring the astronauts home.

The SpaceX mission may carry only two astronauts aboard instead of four, leaving two seats to ferry Wilmore and Williams home early next year. Officials from Nasa said they were still evaluating which spacecraft to use to bring Williams and Wilmore back, and the agency would decide in mid-August.

Advertisement

“We’re in a new situation in that we have multiple options,” said Nasa associate administrator Ken Bowersox. “We don’t just have to bring a crew back on Starliner. We can bring them back on another vehicle.”

“Reasonable people could take either path,” he added, but the agency was “getting more serious about evaluating our other options”.

The move would be a blow to Boeing, which is being scrutinised by regulators over the quality and safety of its processes to manufacture commercial aeroplanes. It plead guilty in July to defrauding the US Federal Aviation Administration.

Nasa astronauts Sunita Williams and Barry Wilmore are greeted by the crew of the International Space Station © AP

Starliner is meant to compete with billionaire Elon Musk’s SpaceX to bring crew and supplies to the space station. But the programme has had its own hurdles, coming in billions of dollars over budget and with multiple launch delays even before Williams and Wilmore lifted off from Cape Canaveral, Florida on June 5, with plans for an eight-day mission.

Since lift-off, helium has leaked from the Starliner and five of its thrusters have functioned improperly. Nasa officials said scientists and engineers were studying the problems to determine their cause.

Advertisement

If Nasa decides to transport Wilmore and Williams back to Earth via SpaceX, Boeing and the agency will need to reconfigure certain software parameters so that Starliner can undock from the space station automatically for its return, rather than requiring crew members to steer.

While Boeing was “very confident” that Starliner can bring the astronauts home, Bowersox said, some staff at Nasa were “more conservative”.

“The Nasa community in general would like to understand a little bit more of the root cause and the physics,” said Steve Stich, manager for Nasa’s commercial crew programme.

Boeing said on Wednesday that, “we still believe in Starliner’s capability and its flight rationale”, a term that means it is safe for a mission to continue. “If Nasa decides to change the mission, we will take the actions necessary to configure Starliner for an uncrewed return.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Judge rules against majority of claims in Black student's hair discrimination case

Published

on

Judge rules against majority of claims in Black student's hair discrimination case

Darryl George of Mont Belvieu, Texas, faced multiple suspensions for not cutting his hair.

Michael Wyke/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Michael Wyke/AP

Darryl George of Mont Belvieu, Texas, faced multiple suspensions for not cutting his hair.

Darryl George of Mont Belvieu, Texas, faced multiple suspensions for not cutting his hair.

Michael Wyke/AP

A federal judge has dismissed most of the claims in a lawsuit filed by a Black Texas high school student who alleged that school officials had violated his civil rights by insisting he cut his hair to fit school policy.

Darryl George’s battle with Barbers Hill High School in Mont Belvieu (a town roughly 40 minutes outside of Houston) began last summer when he faced numerous in-school suspensions over his natural locs.

Advertisement

School officials said George’s locs fell below his eyebrows and ear lobes, according to local media reports, which violates the district’s dress code for male students.

George missed most of his regular classes in his junior year, spending the day in in-school suspension.

“He has to sit on a stool for eight hours in a cubicle,” Darryl’s mother, Darresha George, told The Associated Press at the time. “That’s very uncomfortable. Every day he’d come home, he’d say his back hurts because he has to sit on a stool.”

As a result, George and his mother sued the school district, the district superintendent, his principal and assistant principal as well as Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton for violation of the state’s CROWN Act (Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair), which bans race-based hair discrimination.

George was initially suspended just a day before the Texas law went into effect statewide on Sept 1 of last year.

Advertisement

In the Tuesday ruling, U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Brown dismissed the claims against Abbott, Paxton, and the district and school employees.

Brown also dismissed claims that enforcement was primarily being done against Black students, as well as the claim that George’s First Amendment rights had been violated as a result of the district policy. The judge said the school had not shown a “persistent, widespread practice of disparate, race-based enforcement” with its policy. When it came to the free speech claim, he determined there was no precedent to demonstrate that hair length is supported under the First Amendment.

However, George’s claim of sex discrimination stood. In his ruling, Brown wrote: “What is the rationale for the dress code’s distinction between male and female students? Because the District does not provide any reason for the sex-based distinctions in its dress code, the claim survives this initial stage.”

Brown acknowledged that the state’s case had its issues, invoking a similar case from 1970 in which the judge concluded that “the presence and enforcement of the hair-cut rule causes far more disruption of the classroom instructional process than the hair it seeks to prohibit.”

Brown wrote: “Regrettably, so too here.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Map: 5.2-Magnitude Earthquake Strikes Southern California

Published

on

Map: 5.2-Magnitude Earthquake Strikes Southern California

Note: Map shows the area with a shake intensity of 4 or greater, which U.S.G.S. defines as “light,” though the earthquake may be felt outside the areas shown. The New York Times

A moderately strong, 5.2-magnitude earthquake struck in Southern California on Tuesday, according to the United States Geological Survey.

The temblor happened at 9:09 p.m. Pacific time about 14 miles southwest of Lamont, Calif., data from the agency shows.

As seismologists review available data, they may revise the earthquake’s reported magnitude. Additional information collected about the earthquake may also prompt U.S.G.S. scientists to update the shake-severity map.

Aftershocks in the region

An aftershock is usually a smaller earthquake that follows a larger one in the same general area. Aftershocks are typically minor adjustments along the portion of a fault that slipped at the time of the initial earthquake.

Advertisement

Quakes and aftershocks within 100 miles

Aftershocks can occur days, weeks or even years after the first earthquake. These events can be of equal or larger magnitude to the initial earthquake, and they can continue to affect already damaged locations.

Source: United States Geological Survey | Notes: Shaking categories are based on the Modified Mercalli Intensity scale. When aftershock data is available, the corresponding maps and charts include earthquakes within 100 miles and seven days of the initial quake. All times above are Pacific time. Shake data is as of Wednesday, Aug. 7 at 12:36 a.m. Eastern. Aftershocks data is as of Wednesday, Aug. 7 at 11:40 a.m. Eastern.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending