Connect with us

News

American killed fighting alongside Ukrainian forces in Ukraine

Published

on

American killed fighting alongside Ukrainian forces in Ukraine
The 22-year-old was working with a personal navy contracting firm when he was killed on Monday. The corporate had despatched him to Ukraine, and he was being paid whereas he was preventing there, Cancel’s mom, Rebecca Cabrera, instructed CNN.

Cancel, a former US Marine, in accordance with his mom, signed as much as work for the personal navy contracting firm on high of his full-time job as a corrections officer in Tennessee shortly earlier than the conflict in Ukraine broke out on the finish of February, Cabrera mentioned. When the conflict started, the corporate, in accordance with Cabrera, was looking for contractors to battle in Ukraine and Cancel agreed to go, Cabrera mentioned.

“He wished to go over as a result of he believed in what Ukraine was preventing for, and he wished to be part of it to include it there so it did not come right here, and that possibly our American troopers would not must be concerned in it,” Cabrera instructed CNN in a cellphone interview.

Cancel flew to Poland on March 12 and crossed into Ukraine someday over March 12 and 13, Cabrera mentioned.

The group of males Cancel was preventing alongside have been from “all totally different international locations,” Cabrera mentioned.

Cabrera was instructed by those that notified her of her son’s dying that his physique had not been discovered.

“They have not discovered his physique,” she mentioned. “They’re making an attempt, the boys that have been with him, however it was both seize his physique or get killed, however we might love for him to come back again to us.”

Advertisement

A State Division official mentioned they’re “conscious of those stories and are carefully monitoring the state of affairs.”

“As a consequence of privateness concerns, we now have no additional remark,” the official added. “We as soon as once more reiterate US residents shouldn’t journey to Ukraine as a result of lively armed battle and the singling out of US residents in Ukraine by Russian authorities safety officers, and that US residents in Ukraine ought to depart instantly whether it is secure to take action, utilizing any industrial or different privately out there floor transportation choices.”

Cancel leaves behind a 7-month-old child and a spouse, Cabrera mentioned. Cancel was dwelling in Tennessee earlier than he left for Ukraine, and is initially from Orange County, New York, mentioned Devin Tietze Jr., Cancel’s brother-in-law.

Cabrera mentioned Cancel “all the time put all people forward of himself.”

“He was only a actually considerate individual. He all the time put all people forward of himself even when conditions have been so disturbing,” Cabrera mentioned of her son. “He all the time stored all people laughing and calm. He was the person that stood up when all people else stood again.”

Advertisement

Tietze mentioned Cancel was the “kind to battle for what’s proper whatever the end result,” when requested why Cancel had determined to affix the battle in Ukraine.

“He believed wholeheartedly this should not have occurred and he wished to go assist the individuals in Ukraine,” Tietze mentioned in a cellphone interview.

Willy Joseph Cancel, an American citizen, was killed fighting alongside Ukrainians in Ukraine.

Cabrera mentioned Cancel “wished” to do the navy contract work.

“It was one thing that he believed in his coronary heart, that was the proper factor. He was the kind of man who all the time stepped up when all people else stepped again, and there have been a number of males who have been like that that have been with him,” Cabrera mentioned.

Earlier on Thursday the British authorities confirmed a UK citizen had been killed in Ukraine and mentioned officers are “urgently in search of additional info” on one other who’s lacking, a UK International Workplace spokesperson instructed CNN.

“We will verify {that a} British nationwide has been killed in Ukraine and are supporting their household,” they mentioned.

Advertisement
The Ukrainian Protection Ministry created a particular unit, the Worldwide Legion, for overseas fighters who wished to affix the battle in opposition to Russia. Greater than 20,000 volunteers and veterans from 52 international locations had expressed their need to affix the battle as of March 7, in accordance with Brig. Gen. Kyrylo Budanov, commander of the Primary Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry, which can run this legion.
CNN beforehand reported on overseas nationals, together with residents from the US and the UK, who had left house to affix the battle in Ukraine.

CNN’s Kylie Atwood contributed to this report.

News

Space engine start-up in talks for new capital after funding crunch

Published

on

Space engine start-up in talks for new capital after funding crunch

A British technology start-up which had promised to build the world’s first space plane is in last-ditch talks to secure new financing after two of its backers wrote down the value of their investment.

Reaction Engines, which was founded in 1989, is in detailed talks with the UAE-backed Strategic Development Fund (SDF), one of its existing shareholders, about a new injection of capital, according to two people familiar with the situation. The SDF led a £40mn funding round in January last year. 

The British start-up is also backed by several aerospace giants, including BAE Systems and Rolls-Royce, as well as financial investors Artemis and Schroders.

Reaction has previously raised more than £150mn and grew its commercial revenues by more than 400 per cent last year. The company, however, warned earlier this year that it would need to raise additional financing. It has this weekend lined up PwC, the accountancy firm, to act as administrator if the funding talks collapse.

Sky News first reported that PwC had been put on standby. The accountancy firm, which has not yet been formally appointed, declined to comment on Saturday. Reaction also declined to comment. 

Advertisement

Other existing investors are monitoring the situation, said one of the people close to the talks. 

Artemis and Schroders both announced last week that they had significantly written down the value of their stakes in Reaction. Artemis cut the value of its 2.3 per cent holding by 75 per cent. Artemis Alpha Trust, the fund that manages the London-based fund manager’s stake, now values it at £1.2mn, compared with £6.4mn in April. 

Reaction has in recent years focused on developing a hybrid jet and rocket engine, known as Sabre. The innovative engine was originally planned to power Skylon, a space aircraft also designed by Reaction.

Key to Sabre’s development is Reaction’s groundbreaking pre-cooling technology which prevents engines from overheating and could lead to hypersonic space planes. The company is part of a UK-led military project aiming to make hypersonic flight a reality. At hypersonic speeds, the temperature generated inside a conventional gas turbine would start to melt components unless they were cooled in some way.

More recently the company has focused its attention on developing nearer-term aerospace and commercial applications for its pre-cooling technology. It signed an agreement with US industrial group Honeywell to collaborate on the development of thermal management technologies to help reduce aircraft emissions. 

Advertisement

Reaction is chaired by Philip Dunne, a former UK defence minister. It has been led by Mark Thomas, who was previously at Rolls-Royce. 

Continue Reading

News

Former US President Trump hints at support for Florida ballot measure legalising recreational marijuana – Times of India

Published

on

Former US President Trump hints at support for Florida ballot measure legalising recreational marijuana – Times of India
Former President Trump has suggested he might support a Florida ballot measure to legalise recreational marijuana for adults, known as Amendment 3, reported the Hill.
Trump, a Florida resident, emphasised the importance of this measure being appropriately managed by the state Legislature to avoid public consumption issues.
Emphasis on responsible legislation
“In Florida, like so many other States that have already given their approval, personal amounts of marijuana will be legalised for adults with Amendment 3,” Trump said in a post on his Truth Social site.“Whether people like it or not, this will happen through the approval of the Voters, so it should be done correctly.”

Trump avoided stating his voting intention or openly backing marijuana legalisation but stressed that responsible legislation is necessary to avoid public nuisances. He pointed to the need for laws that prevent marijuana use in public areas to keep public spaces free from the smell of marijuana, similar to the issues observed in other cities.
“The state Legislature needs to responsibly create laws that prohibit marijuana consumption in public spaces so we do not smell marijuana everywhere we go, like we do in many of the Democrat-run Cities,” said Trump.
Concerns over inconsistent marijuana laws
He also highlighted the inconsistency of criminalising marijuana possession in Florida when it is legal in many other states. Trump emphasised that law enforcement resources and lives should not be wasted on arresting adults for possessing small amounts of marijuana.
“We do not need to ruin lives & waste Taxpayer Dollars arresting adults with personal amounts of it on them, and no one should grieve a loved one because they died from fentanyl-laced marijuana,” he added.
Impact on voter mobilisation and Republican division
Trump’s comments follow recent efforts by Democrats to attract younger voters in Florida, focusing on issues like abortion and marijuana legalisation. These issues have mobilised younger voters in other regions, as seen in Ohio, and Democrats hope for a similar impact in Florida.
Democrats are targeting the fall ballot measures, aiming to increase voter turnout and gain the support of younger voters, a group with which Trump has faced challenges.
Earlier in the year, the Department of Justice made a significant move toward reclassifying marijuana as a less dangerous drug. If this reclassification is approved, marijuana will be downgraded to a Schedule III drug.
Despite the trend toward normalisation and Trump’s comments, some Republicans remain opposed to legalising recreational marijuana. Sen Rick Scott has publicly stated his intention to vote against the measure. He cited personal family experience with addiction as a key reason for his opposition.
“My brother, who died at 67 in April, began smoking marijuana as a teenager and led a life of addiction,” Scott said.

Continue Reading

News

Big Oil calls on Kamala Harris to come clean on her energy and climate plans

Published

on

Big Oil calls on Kamala Harris to come clean on her energy and climate plans

Unlock the US Election Countdown newsletter for free

The US oil industry and Republicans are demanding Kamala Harris clarify her energy and climate policy, as the Democratic candidate tries to please her progressive base without alienating voters in shale areas like Pennsylvania, a crucial swing state.

On Thursday, the vice-president said she no longer supported a ban on fracking, the technology that unleashed the shale revolution. But Harris’s reversal has not quelled attacks from Donald Trump or US executives that she would damage the country’s oil and gas sector.

The heads of the US’s two biggest oil lobby groups said the Democratic candidate must also say whether she would keep or end a pause on federal approvals for new liquefied natural gas plants, and whether she supported curbs on drilling imposed by the Biden administration.

Advertisement

“Based on what we know of her past positions, the bills that she has sponsored, and her past statements she’s taken a pretty aggressively anti-energy and anti-oil and gas industry stand,” said Anne Bradbury, head of the American Exploration and Production Council.

“These are significant and major policy questions that impact every American family and business, and which voters deserve to understand better when making their choice in November,” she said.

Mike Sommers, chief executive of the American Petroleum Institute, Big Oil’s most powerful lobby group, said Harris should say whether she would stick with Biden administration policies that had unleashed “a regulatory onslaught the likes of which this industry has never seen”.

Trump, the Republican candidate, has accused Harris of plotting a “war on American energy” and has repeatedly blamed her and President Joe Biden for high fuel costs in recent years.

On Thursday, he vowed to scrap Biden administration policies that “distort energy markets”. The former president has called climate change a hoax and his advisers have said he would gut Biden’s signature climate legislation, the Inflation Reduction Act.

Advertisement

The debate over Harris’s energy policy comes as she and Trump court blue-collar workers in Pennsylvania, a huge shale gas producer that employs 72,000 workers — a potentially decisive voting group in a state Biden won narrowly in 2020.

Harris said in 2019 that she supported a fracking ban but told CNN on Thursday she had ditched that position and the US could have “a thriving clean energy economy without banning fracking”.

US oil and gas production has reached a record high under Biden, even as clean energy capacity has expanded rapidly.

But gas executives in particular have been alarmed at a federal pause on building new LNG export plants, which supply customers from Europe to Asia, saying the policy will stymie further US shale output.

Toby Rice, chief executive of Pennsylvania-based EQT, the US’s largest natural gas producer, said Harris should lift the restrictions, which he argued would compromise energy security.

Advertisement

“Ignoring her anti-fracking statement four years ago for a second, can we talk about the recent LNG Pause that was put in place this year?”, he said. “This is a policy that has received massive criticism from all sides — our allies, industry and environmental champions . . . a step backwards for climate and American energy security.”

While Biden put climate at the centre of his and Harris’s 2020 White House campaign, Harris has been largely silent, and made only a passing reference to climate change in her speech at the Democratic convention.

“It looks like the Harris campaign has concluded that it’s safer to avoid antagonising producers or climate activists by skirting these issues entirely,” said Kevin Book, managing director of ClearView Energy Partners.

Climate-focused voters are less vexed than energy executives by the lack of explicit policy from Harris.

“Let’s be clear: the most important climate policy right now is defeating Donald Trump in November,” said Cassidy DiPaola of Fossil Free Media, a non-profit organisation. “All the wonky policy details in the world won’t matter if climate deniers control the White House.”

Advertisement

Last week the political arms of the League of Conservation Voters, Climate Power and the Environmental Defense Fund unveiled a $55mn advertising campaign backing Harris in swing states, focused on economic rather than climate issues.

In contrast, Trump has courted oil bosses who are backing his pledge to slash regulation and scrap clean energy subsidies. His campaign received nearly $14mn from the industry in June, according to OpenSecrets, almost double his oil haul in May.

Additional reporting by Sam Learner

Climate Capital

Where climate change meets business, markets and politics. Explore the FT’s coverage here.

Are you curious about the FT’s environmental sustainability commitments? Find out more about our science-based targets here

Advertisement

   

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending