Connect with us

News

Alex Murdaugh admits he lied to investigators about his whereabouts the night of his wife and son’s killings | CNN

Published

on

Alex Murdaugh admits he lied to investigators about his whereabouts the night of his wife and son’s killings | CNN


Walterboro, South Carolina
CNN
 — 

Alex Murdaugh took the stand to testify in his double homicide trial Thursday morning, admitting he lied to investigators when he stated he was not on the scene of the killings of his spouse and son minutes earlier than the state says the deadly shootings happened in June 2021.

Nearly instantly, Murdaugh acknowledged his voice is heard in a video that gave the impression to be filmed on the canine kennels the place the our bodies of Margaret “Maggie” Murdaugh and Paul Murdaugh had been discovered, saying he lied about being on the kennels earlier that night due to “paranoid pondering” stemming from his drug dependancy.

The state has used the video to place Murdaugh on the scene of the killings, contradicting his repeated statements to legislation enforcement that he had not been there that evening, and quite a few witnesses have recognized his voice within the background of the video recorded by Paul at 8:44 p.m. the evening of June 7, 2021.

“Mr. Murdaugh, is that you simply on the kennel video at 8:44 p.m. on June 7,” protection legal professional Jim Griffin requested, “the evening Maggie and Paul had been murdered?”

Advertisement

“It’s,” Murdaugh stated, later including, “I wasn’t pondering clearly. I don’t assume I used to be able to motive, and I lied about being down there, and I’m so sorry that I did.”

Nonetheless, Murdaugh was emphatic in his denial that he shot and killed his spouse and son, insisting in response to Griffin’s questions, “I didn’t shoot my spouse or my son, anytime, ever.”

FOLLOW LIVE UPDATES: Alex Murdaugh testifies in homicide trial

Murdaugh has pleaded not responsible to 2 counts of homicide and two weapons expenses within the killings of his spouse and son on the household’s property – a property often called Moselle – in Islandton, South Carolina.

Previous to Thursday, Murdaugh had repeatedly denied being on the scene of the deadly shootings. He advised investigators he had gone to go to his mom that night and located the our bodies by the kennels when he returned house later that evening.

Advertisement

Prosecutors accuse Murdaugh of killing his spouse and son to distract from an array of alleged monetary crimes, for which the now-disbarred legal professional faces 99 expenses separate from the homicide case. However the protection maintains Murdaugh – the scion of a strong South Carolina household who held the native solicitor’s workplace for 3 generations – is a caring father who has been wrongly accused after a mishandled investigation.

Murdaugh was sworn in Thursday morning, promising to inform “the entire fact and nothing however the fact,” quickly after telling Decide Clifton Newman he wished to testify, prompting an audible, collective gasp from the gallery within the Colleton County courthouse in Walterboro, South Carolina.

Murdaugh opted to take the stand regardless of Newman’s determination to disclaim a protection request to restrict the scope of questioning Murdaugh would face beneath cross-examination, particularly in regard to his alleged monetary crimes, which the state has pointed to as a potential motive for the killings.

Newman denied the request, echoing his determination from a day prior when he dominated to not subject a blanket order limiting the state’s questions, saying it was “unprecedented to me.”

Advertisement

The decide beforehand dominated to permit prosecutors to current proof associated to Murdaugh’s alleged monetary crimes, which the protection has argued are irrelevant to the homicide case. The state, nonetheless, contends the purported misconduct was about to be revealed on the time of the killings and that he fatally shot his spouse and son with a view to stave off these looming revelations.

Prosecutors rested their case final week after calling greater than 60 witnesses to the stand. Within the absence of direct DNA or eyewitness proof connecting Murdaugh to the killings, they’ve tried to point out Murdaugh lied to investigators and was on the scene simply minutes earlier than the deadly shootings.

Murdaugh testified he went to the Moselle kennels at Maggie’s request the evening of the killings, however that he didn’t need to go. He had already showered, he stated, and adjusted his garments after sweating throughout a experience with Paul across the property earlier that night undercutting questions raised by the state about what he was sporting that evening.

A Snapchat video filmed by Paul whereas they surveyed the property confirmed Murdaugh sporting lengthy khaki pants and a blue, short-sleeved button down shirt. However when legislation enforcement responded to the scene after the our bodies had been discovered, he was sporting shorts and a white T-shirt.

“It was scorching, and I had simply had a bathe. I knew that I’d find yourself doing extra work and sweating extra. And the canine is at all times a chaotic scene,” Murdaugh stated Thursday. “I simply didn’t need to go proper then.”

Advertisement

Maggie and Paul went earlier than he did, Murdaugh stated, however he in the end determined to go. He testified he took a golf cart to the kennels, the place Maggie had let loose the canine whereas Paul was “fooling” with the tail of 1 canine that belonged to his good friend.

Quickly after, Murdaugh returned to the home, he stated, the place he lay down on the sofa.

“I’m not optimistic, I dozed off for a minute, or didn’t nod off for a minute,” he stated. However when he bought up, he’d made up his thoughts he was going to go to his mom, who was affected by Alzheimer’s at her house in close by Almeda.

Murdaugh testified he spoke earlier that day to one in every of his mom’s caregivers, Barbara Mixson, who testified Wednesday she referred to as Murdaugh and advised him to go to as a result of his mom was “agitated.”

Murdaugh knocked on the door when he arrived, he stated, however the different caregiver, Mushell Smith, didn’t hear it so he referred to as Smith to be let in. Smith beforehand testified for the state that the timing of the nighttime go to was uncommon and that Murdaugh had referred to as her when he bought to the home.

Advertisement

Griffin requested Murdaugh about GPS knowledge from his automobile that confirmed the automotive stopped for a few minute whereas in his mom’s driveway. Requested if he was disposing of homicide weapons or bloody garments, Murdaugh stated, “No.”

Murdaugh went again to Moselle, the place he stated he first went to the home. Maggie and Paul weren’t there, he stated, and Murdaugh assumed they had been nonetheless on the kennels, so he went there.

“What’d you see?” Griffin requested.

“I noticed what y’all have seen footage of,” Murdaugh advised the jury, referring to his spouse and son’s our bodies, rising emotional and wiping away tears. “So unhealthy.”

“I’m not precisely positive what I did. I do know I bought out of my automotive, I do know I ran again to my automotive and referred to as 911,” Murdaugh stated. “I used to be on the cellphone with 911 and I used to be attempting to are likely to Paul Paul,” he stated, utilizing his nickname for his youngest son, “and I used to be attempting to are likely to Maggie, and I simply went forwards and backwards between them.

Advertisement

Paul’s accidents had been notably unhealthy, Murdaugh stated, and he recalled attempting to examine his son’s physique for a pulse after which attempting to show him over.

“I don’t know why I attempted to show him over,” an emotional Murdaugh stated. “I imply, my boy’s laying face down. He’s executed the best way he’s executed. His head was the best way his head was. I may see his mind laying on the sidewalk. I didn’t know what to do.”

Griffin performed an audio recording of the 911 name, wherein Murdaugh was heard saying, “I ought to’ve recognized” – a reference, Murdaugh testified, to the purported threats his son was receiving after a February 2019 boating accident that killed 19-year-old Mallory Seashore.

Paul had pleaded not responsible to prison expenses within the accident, although courtroom data confirmed the costs had been dropped after his demise. Murdaugh, who owned the boat, was going through a civil lawsuit from Seashore’s household.

“He bought probably the most vile threats,” Murdaugh stated Thursday, describing social media messages he stated had been “so excessive, honestly, we didn’t assume something about it.”

Advertisement

Physique digital camera footage performed through the first day of the prosecution’s case confirmed Murdaugh telling a Colleton County Sheriff’s Workplace sergeant in regards to the accident and the threats, unprompted, inside moments of the deputy arriving on the scene. Murdaugh’s surviving son, Buster Murdaugh, equally described the threats when he testified earlier this week.

Murdaugh rebutted earlier testimony about knowledge collected from his cellphone that evening, which confirmed he searched Google for a restaurant in Edisto Seashore, learn a gaggle textual content message quickly after discovering the our bodies and referred to as a videographer.

Any of these actions had been inadvertent, he stated, telling the jury he was attempting to name his brothers and a household good friend.

“Clearly, they’re unintentional,” he stated. “I imply, I’m doing one thing with my cellphone attempting to name individuals however I’m not attempting to name these individuals. I’m not doing a Google seek for any Whaley’s restaurant and I’m actually not studying any textual content.”

Murdaugh additionally rejected the suggestion he had blood on his shirt the evening of the murders, saying, “There’s no approach that I had excessive velocity blood splatter on me.”

Advertisement

“I used to be nowhere close to Paul and Maggie once they bought shot.”

Correction: An earlier model of this story misspelled Alex Murdaugh’s final identify.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

It is not too late for Joe Biden to go

Published

on

It is not too late for Joe Biden to go

Unlock the US Election Countdown newsletter for free

The best that can be said of Joe Biden’s stumbling debate performance was that it took place in June. If he were pressed to step down as nominee there would still be two months to go before the Democratic convention. For Biden’s loyalists, who have always moved swiftly to shut down any hint of dissent about his candidacy, Thursday night was a moment of truth. For more than a year, private conversations in Washington have been dominated by the president’s ageing. But the public omerta on that topic broadly held up. That cognitive dissonance has now collapsed. The story is now about whether Biden can be persuaded to step down.

The choice is his alone. Having crushed the Democratic nomination, Biden would be within his rights to ignore pleas to step aside. Potential alternative nominees, such as Gavin Newsom, California’s governor, and Gretchen Whitmer, Michigan’s governor, will be unlikely to speak out. The risk of being labelled a traitor and ruining their presidential chances would be too great. There is no such thing as a committee of party elders who can prevail on Biden to vacate the crown. He is the leader of the party. A tap on the shoulder from the younger Hillary Clinton, 76, or the much younger Barack Obama, 62, would risk backfiring.

Those who know Biden best say the only people who could influence him are his family, starting with the first lady, Jill Biden. Biden is a stubborn man. Most presidents are. Until Thursday night, he believed he was the only Democrat who could beat Donald Trump. Now it looks like he is on a course to defeat in November. As Biden’s mumbling, and often inaudible, performance went on, the prediction markets reacted in real time. By the end of the debate, one political betting market, PredictIt, gave Trump a 61 per cent chance of winning, having started the debate at 53 per cent. This put a number on what almost everyone was thinking.

Advertisement

The risk for Democrats now is two-fold. The first is that Biden simply refuses to budge. Indeed, that is still the likeliest outcome. While the debate was happening, Biden’s aides were putting it about that he was suffering from a heavy cold, which explained his hoarse delivery. By this point, everyone had forgotten Trump’s forecast that Biden would take a “shot in the ass”, or even cocaine, to enhance his performance. If Biden believes he simply had a bad night, he could eat up the precious time Democrats have to elect a replacement. The worst thing he could do is cling on for another few weeks then step down. He would need to make the announcement in the next few days.

The second risk is that Biden does decide to step aside in good time and the Democratic party descends into civil war. Another reason Biden has been so reluctant to consider quitting is the unpopularity of Kamala Harris, the vice-president. But as the first female and non-white vice-president, it would be provocative for Biden to endorse anyone else. If he did not name Harris as his heir apparent, the party could polarise along ideological lines. Anyone competing with Harris for the nomination, particularly a white male, would risk being depicted as the enemy of progress. A bitter Democratic nomination battle culminating in a divisive convention in Chicago offers too many historical echoes for comfort. The last time Democrats held their convention in that Midwestern city was in 1968. It turned into a circular firing squad.

These risks were already known. But the upsides are suddenly clearer. Many democracies can hold a general election and change their government in the timeframe between now and the Chicago convention. Indeed, Britain looks set to do so next week having declared a snap election in late May. The fact that no US party has held an open convention in recent memory should be no obstacle. Everything about America’s 2024 presidential race is unprecedented. This includes the advanced age of both candidates and the fact that one of them, Trump, has repudiated the results of the last election.

Bill Clinton once said Americans prefer “strong and wrong” to “weak and right”. On Thursday, those two options were on the debate stage. Every Democrat, including Biden, tirelessly repeats that democracy is on the ballot this November. They argue that the stakes for America are existential. The question now is whether they have the ruthlessness to act on those beliefs.

There is no shortage of Democratic talent. Nor would a noisy contest necessarily be bad for the party. Democrats would be showcasing the lively democratic process that they believe is in peril. The question that Biden, and the first lady, must now ask themselves is who Trump would fear more: Biden, or a younger opponent who could fire off the rebuttals that he failed to deliver on Thursday? To a growing number of Democrats, that question answers itself.

Advertisement

edward.luce@ft.com

Continue Reading

News

'Babbling' and 'hoarse': Biden's debate performance sends Democrats into a panic

Published

on

'Babbling' and 'hoarse': Biden's debate performance sends Democrats into a panic

ATLANTA — President Joe Biden was supposed to put the nation’s mind at ease over his physical and mental capacity with his debate showing Thursday night. 

But from the onset of the debate, the 81-year-old seemingly struggled even to talk, mostly summoning a weak, raspy voice. In the opening minutes, the president repeatedly tripped over his words, misspoke and lost his train of thought.  

In one of the most notable moments, Biden ended a rambling statement that lacked focus by saying, “We finally beat Medicare,” before moderators cut him off and transitioned back to Trump. 

While Biden warmed up and gained more of a rhythm as the debate progressed, he struggled to land a punch against Trump, much less fact-check everything said by the former president, as Trump unleashed a torrent of bad information.

Trump also pounced on Biden, saying at one point that he didn’t understand what Biden had just said with regard to the border. 

Advertisement

“I don’t know if he knows what he said either,” Trump said.   

Nearly an hour into the debate, a Biden aide and others familiar with his situation offered up an explanation for the president’s hoarseness: He has a cold.

But there were problems aside from the shakiness of Biden’s voice. When he wasn’t talking, he often stared off into the distance. Trump frequently steamrolled over Biden, accusing him of being a criminal and for peddling misinformation — many times without a response from Biden, though the president did fire back with a handful of one-liners throughout.

The Biden campaign acknowledged that the debate would be a critical moment in the election, with officials hoping it could shake up the race to the president’s benefit. Most polls have found the race to be neck and neck, with razor-thin margins that have moved negligibly for months, even after a New York jury found Trump guilty on 34 felony counts. 

Questions about Biden’s age and frailty have dragged down his polling numbers for months. The public concerns are exacerbated by deceptively edited videos, some of which have gone viral, that cut off relevant portions of an event, making it appear as if Biden is wandering or confused. This was Biden’s first opportunity since the State of the Union speech to dispel that narrative. 

Advertisement

Instead of a new beginning, many Democrats saw it as a moment for panic. 

“Democrats just committed collective suicide,” said one party strategist who has worked on presidential campaigns. “Biden sounds hoarse, looks tired and is babbling. He is reaffirming everything voters already perceived. President Biden can’t win. This debate is a nail in the political coffin.“ 

“It’s hard to argue that we shouldn’t nominate someone else,” a Democratic consultant who works on down-ballot races added. 

Biden did ramp up as the debate progressed. 

“Only one of us is a convicted felon, and I’m looking at him,” Biden said to Trump. That was one moment that tested particularly well in the Biden campaign’s internal real-time polling at the time of the debate, according to a person familiar. 

Advertisement

A Biden aide said that it was “not an ideal start” for the president at the beginning of the debate, but that there was “no mass panic” at the campaign headquarters in Delaware.

The muting of the candidates’ microphones at the debate, a stipulation agreed to before the debate by both campaigns, added a new dimension to the face-off. The first Biden-Trump match-up in 2020 was marked by repeated interruptions by Trump, leading to moments of frustration for Biden.

“Will you shut up, man?” Biden complained in that first Cleveland debate. 

Reaction pours in

“I’m thinking the Democrats are thinking about who the Barry Goldwater is who can walk in tomorrow and tell the president he needs to step aside,” said Ben Proto, chairman of the Connecticut Republican Party.

In 1974, after key Watergate tapes were made public, then-Sen. Barry Goldwater, R-Ariz., went to see President Richard Nixon alongside other prominent lawmakers, telling Nixon that he would be convicted by the Senate and should step aside — which the president did.

Advertisement

Biden’s campaign defended his performance, saying he offered a “positive and winning vision” for America.

“On the other side of the stage was Donald Trump, who offered a dark and backwards window into what America will look like if he steps foot back in the White House: a country where women are forced to beg for the health care they need to stay alive. A country that puts the interests of billionaires over working people,” Biden campaign chair Jen O’Malley Dillon said in a statement. “And a former president who not once, not twice, but three times, failed to promise he would accept the results of a free and fair election this November.”

Some Democrats also defended Biden presidency more broadly after the debate, pointing to his policies over Trump’s.

“One thing this debate won’t change is Trump’s base instinct to sell out anyone to make a quick buck or put his own image on a steak, golf course, or even the Holy Bible,” said Brandon Weathersby, a spokesman with the pro-Biden American Bridge 21st Century super PAC. “Trump puts himself first everytime and that won’t change if he becomes president again.”

Trump, meanwhile, has fended off his own questions over whether he’s diminished by age, including his struggles to stay on topic and his meandering when speaking. Biden has posited that the former president “snapped” after his 2020 election loss and is unstable, which he aired again Thursday night.

Advertisement

Trump often gave his typical rambling responses and seemed at times to make up factoids and figures.

“During my four years, I had the best environmental numbers ever, and my top environmental people gave me that statistic just before I walked on the stage, actually,” Trump said.

Trump also said that he would lower insulin prices for seniors, but it was Biden who signed legislation in 2022 that lowered out-of-pocket cost for people on Medicare to $35 a month and covered all insulin products. 

Setting the stage for the fall

The first debate during the 2020 election cycle was in early September, making the first 2024 general election debate significantly earlier than usual — more than two months ahead of Labor Day, which is often seen as the point when most voters start to pay attention to presidential contests.

“Debates move numbers,” said Matt Gorman, a longtime Republican strategist who worked for Tim Scott’s presidential campaign. “And with this so early — and the next one not until September — you’re stuck with the narrative for four long months.”

Advertisement

“And one and the other’s performance will set the tone for the next one,” he added.

For months, Trump’s team has been hammering Biden’s mental acuity, a strategy that is at odds with how campaigns generally handle the lead-up to debates, when they try to build up opponents as deft debaters to set expectations.

The expectations for Biden were low, and by almost all estimates he was unable to clear them.

“Biden just had to beat himself; unfortunately the stumbling and diminished Joe Biden the world has come to know made Trump look competent and energetic,” said a former Trump campaign official who is not working for his campaign in 2024. “I expect there will be some loud calls from Democrats for a change on the top of the ticket.”

“The floor for Biden was so low,” the person added. “After Biden’s debate performance, it seems the floor is six feet under.”

Advertisement

The 90-minute debate hit on a wide range of topics, but many of the most dominant themes were centered on those that have been most prominent on the campaign trail over the past few months.

Trump hit Biden on two big policy fights that have stubbornly dogged his campaign: immigration and inflation. 

Since Biden took office, 15 million jobs have been created and the unemployment rate sits at a relatively low 4%, but prices for consumer goods have remained high and provided a consistent line of attack from the Trump campaign and Republicans more broadly.

In one heated exchange, Trump point-blank said “he caused the inflation.” Biden said in response there was less inflation under Trump because he tanked the economy. 

“There was no inflation when I came into office,” Biden said before that rejoinder — a quote that was quickly used by Republicans as evidence that all of the current price hikes happened on Biden’s watch.

Advertisement

Trump continued to attack Biden over his border policies, which his campaign has used as one of its biggest lines of attack throughout the campaign. That often including amplifying each time an undocumented migrant commits a crime even though the data does not support the idea of a migrant crime wave.

We have a border that is the most dangerous place anywhere in the world,” Trump said.

Earlier this year, Trump used his influence over congressional Republicans to successfully block a bipartisan border deal that Biden supported.

Biden also tried to land a punch on Jan. 6, trying to build on the oft-discussed idea that Trump returning to the White House would be a threat to democracy.

“He encouraged those folks to go up to Capitol Hill,” Biden said. “He sat there for three hours being begged by his vice president and many colleagues on the Republican side to do something.”

Advertisement

Trump deflected, arguing the Biden should be “ashamed” for arresting those who participated in the attempted insurrection. 

Continue Reading

News

NFL hit with $4.7bn antitrust verdict over ‘Sunday Ticket’ game package

Published

on

NFL hit with $4.7bn antitrust verdict over ‘Sunday Ticket’ game package

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

A California jury has found the US National Football League violated antitrust laws and ordered it to pay $4.7bn in damages to customers who bought a package of its live games over satellite television, in a landmark case that could reshape the market for sports rights distribution.

The verdict comes in a federal class-action lawsuit brought by subscribers to the NFL’s Sunday Ticket package, who alleged the league’s out-of-market games violated antitrust rules by restricting competition for certain Sunday afternoon fixtures to pay-TV.

The case, which was tried in a federal court in Los Angeles, may have wide-reaching consequences for how live sports rights are bundled. It also delivers a significant blow to the world’s richest sports league, as the fines could be tripled under US federal antitrust law.

Advertisement

The NFL said it was “disappointed” with the verdict. “We continue to believe that our media distribution strategy . . . is by far the most fan friendly distribution model in all of sports and entertainment.” It said it would “contest” the verdict and maintained the claims were “baseless and without merit”.

In 1961, US Congress passed the Sports Broadcasting Act, which gives professional sports leagues such as the NFL an exemption from antitrust laws in order to pool sales of its media broadcast rights. Underpinning the act is the idea that professional teams including the Dallas Cowboys and the New York Giants operate as franchises of one business unit — the league — and as such media distribution of their fixtures is not in competition with one another.

Still, there are four time zones across the continental US, and the majority of NFL fixtures take place simultaneously on Sunday afternoons. That has created demand for so-called out-of-network games, which the league sells as its Sunday Ticket package. Viewers can watch fixtures of local teams on their regional Fox or CBS free-to-air network, but must purchase Sunday Ticket to watch games outside their home markets.

Underscoring the seriousness of the case and its implication for the future of live sports rights, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell and Cowboys owner Jerry Jones were among the witnesses testifying for the league during the trial. Goodell told the jury it was the first time he has presented under oath in a federal courtroom since he began his term in 2006, according to a report from the Associated Press.

The league maintained Sunday Ticket is a premium product with premium pricing, and as such would not undercut viewership for free-to-air local games. The package costs between $349 and $449 per year, depending on whether consumers have a subscription with distributor YouTube TV. Sunday Ticket was distributed by satellite provider DirecTV from 1994 until 2023, when the league awarded the rights to Google’s YouTube TV in a record $14bn contract.

Advertisement

The lawsuit was brought by a San Francisco sports bar called the Mucky Duck in 2015 and has since been expanded to a class-action representing millions of subscribers and tens of thousands of similar establishments. The plaintiffs have highlighted, among other evidence, a 2017 internal NFL memo titled “New Frontier”, which suggested the league could divvy up Sunday fixtures across cable channels rather than pool them to satellite TV.

Unlike other US professional leagues, including Major League Baseball and the National Basketball Association, NFL teams do not offer individual TV packages. In his trial testimony, Cowboys owner Jones said he was “completely against each team doing TV deals”, according to the AP, despite the fact that a theoretical direct-to-consumer offering for his team — estimated to be worth $9bn by Forbes, the most valuable professional club in global sport — would likely rake in subscriptions.

Continue Reading

Trending