Connect with us

News

Alex Murdaugh admits he lied to investigators about his whereabouts the night of his wife and son’s killings | CNN

Published

on

Alex Murdaugh admits he lied to investigators about his whereabouts the night of his wife and son’s killings | CNN


Walterboro, South Carolina
CNN
 — 

Alex Murdaugh took the stand to testify in his double homicide trial Thursday morning, admitting he lied to investigators when he stated he was not on the scene of the killings of his spouse and son minutes earlier than the state says the deadly shootings happened in June 2021.

Nearly instantly, Murdaugh acknowledged his voice is heard in a video that gave the impression to be filmed on the canine kennels the place the our bodies of Margaret “Maggie” Murdaugh and Paul Murdaugh had been discovered, saying he lied about being on the kennels earlier that night due to “paranoid pondering” stemming from his drug dependancy.

The state has used the video to place Murdaugh on the scene of the killings, contradicting his repeated statements to legislation enforcement that he had not been there that evening, and quite a few witnesses have recognized his voice within the background of the video recorded by Paul at 8:44 p.m. the evening of June 7, 2021.

“Mr. Murdaugh, is that you simply on the kennel video at 8:44 p.m. on June 7,” protection legal professional Jim Griffin requested, “the evening Maggie and Paul had been murdered?”

Advertisement

“It’s,” Murdaugh stated, later including, “I wasn’t pondering clearly. I don’t assume I used to be able to motive, and I lied about being down there, and I’m so sorry that I did.”

Nonetheless, Murdaugh was emphatic in his denial that he shot and killed his spouse and son, insisting in response to Griffin’s questions, “I didn’t shoot my spouse or my son, anytime, ever.”

FOLLOW LIVE UPDATES: Alex Murdaugh testifies in homicide trial

Murdaugh has pleaded not responsible to 2 counts of homicide and two weapons expenses within the killings of his spouse and son on the household’s property – a property often called Moselle – in Islandton, South Carolina.

Previous to Thursday, Murdaugh had repeatedly denied being on the scene of the deadly shootings. He advised investigators he had gone to go to his mom that night and located the our bodies by the kennels when he returned house later that evening.

Advertisement

Prosecutors accuse Murdaugh of killing his spouse and son to distract from an array of alleged monetary crimes, for which the now-disbarred legal professional faces 99 expenses separate from the homicide case. However the protection maintains Murdaugh – the scion of a strong South Carolina household who held the native solicitor’s workplace for 3 generations – is a caring father who has been wrongly accused after a mishandled investigation.

Murdaugh was sworn in Thursday morning, promising to inform “the entire fact and nothing however the fact,” quickly after telling Decide Clifton Newman he wished to testify, prompting an audible, collective gasp from the gallery within the Colleton County courthouse in Walterboro, South Carolina.

Murdaugh opted to take the stand regardless of Newman’s determination to disclaim a protection request to restrict the scope of questioning Murdaugh would face beneath cross-examination, particularly in regard to his alleged monetary crimes, which the state has pointed to as a potential motive for the killings.

Newman denied the request, echoing his determination from a day prior when he dominated to not subject a blanket order limiting the state’s questions, saying it was “unprecedented to me.”

Advertisement

The decide beforehand dominated to permit prosecutors to current proof associated to Murdaugh’s alleged monetary crimes, which the protection has argued are irrelevant to the homicide case. The state, nonetheless, contends the purported misconduct was about to be revealed on the time of the killings and that he fatally shot his spouse and son with a view to stave off these looming revelations.

Prosecutors rested their case final week after calling greater than 60 witnesses to the stand. Within the absence of direct DNA or eyewitness proof connecting Murdaugh to the killings, they’ve tried to point out Murdaugh lied to investigators and was on the scene simply minutes earlier than the deadly shootings.

Murdaugh testified he went to the Moselle kennels at Maggie’s request the evening of the killings, however that he didn’t need to go. He had already showered, he stated, and adjusted his garments after sweating throughout a experience with Paul across the property earlier that night undercutting questions raised by the state about what he was sporting that evening.

A Snapchat video filmed by Paul whereas they surveyed the property confirmed Murdaugh sporting lengthy khaki pants and a blue, short-sleeved button down shirt. However when legislation enforcement responded to the scene after the our bodies had been discovered, he was sporting shorts and a white T-shirt.

“It was scorching, and I had simply had a bathe. I knew that I’d find yourself doing extra work and sweating extra. And the canine is at all times a chaotic scene,” Murdaugh stated Thursday. “I simply didn’t need to go proper then.”

Advertisement

Maggie and Paul went earlier than he did, Murdaugh stated, however he in the end determined to go. He testified he took a golf cart to the kennels, the place Maggie had let loose the canine whereas Paul was “fooling” with the tail of 1 canine that belonged to his good friend.

Quickly after, Murdaugh returned to the home, he stated, the place he lay down on the sofa.

“I’m not optimistic, I dozed off for a minute, or didn’t nod off for a minute,” he stated. However when he bought up, he’d made up his thoughts he was going to go to his mom, who was affected by Alzheimer’s at her house in close by Almeda.

Murdaugh testified he spoke earlier that day to one in every of his mom’s caregivers, Barbara Mixson, who testified Wednesday she referred to as Murdaugh and advised him to go to as a result of his mom was “agitated.”

Murdaugh knocked on the door when he arrived, he stated, however the different caregiver, Mushell Smith, didn’t hear it so he referred to as Smith to be let in. Smith beforehand testified for the state that the timing of the nighttime go to was uncommon and that Murdaugh had referred to as her when he bought to the home.

Advertisement

Griffin requested Murdaugh about GPS knowledge from his automobile that confirmed the automotive stopped for a few minute whereas in his mom’s driveway. Requested if he was disposing of homicide weapons or bloody garments, Murdaugh stated, “No.”

Murdaugh went again to Moselle, the place he stated he first went to the home. Maggie and Paul weren’t there, he stated, and Murdaugh assumed they had been nonetheless on the kennels, so he went there.

“What’d you see?” Griffin requested.

“I noticed what y’all have seen footage of,” Murdaugh advised the jury, referring to his spouse and son’s our bodies, rising emotional and wiping away tears. “So unhealthy.”

“I’m not precisely positive what I did. I do know I bought out of my automotive, I do know I ran again to my automotive and referred to as 911,” Murdaugh stated. “I used to be on the cellphone with 911 and I used to be attempting to are likely to Paul Paul,” he stated, utilizing his nickname for his youngest son, “and I used to be attempting to are likely to Maggie, and I simply went forwards and backwards between them.

Advertisement

Paul’s accidents had been notably unhealthy, Murdaugh stated, and he recalled attempting to examine his son’s physique for a pulse after which attempting to show him over.

“I don’t know why I attempted to show him over,” an emotional Murdaugh stated. “I imply, my boy’s laying face down. He’s executed the best way he’s executed. His head was the best way his head was. I may see his mind laying on the sidewalk. I didn’t know what to do.”

Griffin performed an audio recording of the 911 name, wherein Murdaugh was heard saying, “I ought to’ve recognized” – a reference, Murdaugh testified, to the purported threats his son was receiving after a February 2019 boating accident that killed 19-year-old Mallory Seashore.

Paul had pleaded not responsible to prison expenses within the accident, although courtroom data confirmed the costs had been dropped after his demise. Murdaugh, who owned the boat, was going through a civil lawsuit from Seashore’s household.

“He bought probably the most vile threats,” Murdaugh stated Thursday, describing social media messages he stated had been “so excessive, honestly, we didn’t assume something about it.”

Advertisement

Physique digital camera footage performed through the first day of the prosecution’s case confirmed Murdaugh telling a Colleton County Sheriff’s Workplace sergeant in regards to the accident and the threats, unprompted, inside moments of the deputy arriving on the scene. Murdaugh’s surviving son, Buster Murdaugh, equally described the threats when he testified earlier this week.

Murdaugh rebutted earlier testimony about knowledge collected from his cellphone that evening, which confirmed he searched Google for a restaurant in Edisto Seashore, learn a gaggle textual content message quickly after discovering the our bodies and referred to as a videographer.

Any of these actions had been inadvertent, he stated, telling the jury he was attempting to name his brothers and a household good friend.

“Clearly, they’re unintentional,” he stated. “I imply, I’m doing one thing with my cellphone attempting to name individuals however I’m not attempting to name these individuals. I’m not doing a Google seek for any Whaley’s restaurant and I’m actually not studying any textual content.”

Murdaugh additionally rejected the suggestion he had blood on his shirt the evening of the murders, saying, “There’s no approach that I had excessive velocity blood splatter on me.”

Advertisement

“I used to be nowhere close to Paul and Maggie once they bought shot.”

Correction: An earlier model of this story misspelled Alex Murdaugh’s final identify.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Yosemite Bans Large Flags From El Capitan, Criminalizing Protests

Published

on

Yosemite Bans Large Flags From El Capitan, Criminalizing Protests

It is one of America’s most majestic and recognizable landmarks, having beckoned Teddy Roosevelt, Ansel Adams and, more recently, protesters.

From the granite walls of El Capitan in California’s Yosemite National Park, demonstrators have draped large flags and banners several times in the past year in protest of a number of issues, including the Israel-Hamas war and various Trump administration policies.

There was one symbolizing transgender pride, another saying “Stop the Genocide” and an upside-down American flag, which represents distress.

Now, the federal government seemingly wants to keep the famous rock formation a blank slate. It has outlawed large flags, banners and signs from El Capitan and most of the park altogether.

The ban appears to have been formalized last month by Yosemite’s acting superintendent, Raymond McPadden, in a Park Service compendium of regulations dated May 20.

Advertisement

The rule tracks with a series of punitive actions by the Trump administration against some critics of its immigration policies and Palestinian sympathizers.

Violators could face up to six months in jail and a fine of up to $5,000 for individuals and $10,000 for groups — penalties already in place for various offenses in the park.

“This restriction is necessary to preserve the values of wilderness character in accordance with the Wilderness Act, provide for an unimpaired visitor experience, protect natural and cultural resources in designated Wilderness and Potential Wilderness Addition portions of the park,” Mr. McPadden wrote.

Parks officials also cast the display of large flags — those greater than 3 feet by 5 feet — on any of the cliffs or mountains in Yosemite as a potential safety hazard that they said could interfere with climbing activity. Flags larger than that size would require a permit.

The Park Service did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Tuesday about the new rule, which was reported earlier by Climbing magazine and SFGate.com. Nor did the White House.

Advertisement

Miranda Oakley, 40, one of four climbers who unfurled a 25-by-10-foot banner last June with the colors of the Palestinian flag saying “Stop the Genocide,” said in an interview on Tuesday that the Trump administration was further trying to suppress voices of dissent.

“To me, it still seems like they want to control what we’re saying,” said Ms. Oakley, who is part of the group Climbers for Palestine.

Ms. Oakley wondered what would happen to people who don’t cooperate with the new rule.

“Are they going to detain them indefinitely, as they have for some international students that have spoken out for Palestine?” she asked.

In February, a small group of protesters hung an inverted American flag — a signal for distress that began with sailors — off the side of El Capitan to protest the Trump administration’s cuts to the Park Service.

Advertisement

Plenty of eyes were already fixated on El Capitan for the annual phenomenon known as firefall, when the light from the setting sun causes a seasonal waterfall to glow orange.

The display occurred shortly after at least 1,000 Park Service employees were abruptly dismissed from their jobs, part of a sweeping federal work force downsizing initiative that was once overseen by President Trump’s now-estranged ally, Elon Musk.

An additional 3,000 people were fired from the U.S. Forest Service, which plays a significant supporting role with the parks.

In May, a group of climbers unfurled a transgender pride flag in the middle of El Capitan to criticize the Trump administration’s rollback of protections for L.G.B.T.Q. people, including its elimination of diversity, equity and inclusion programs, The San Francisco Chronicle reported.

On the same day last month that the compendium was issued, Doug Burgum, the interior secretary, whose agency oversees the Park Service, asked the public to take note of any signs at parks or on public lands that “are negative about either past or living Americans.” In a directive, Mr. Burgum said that he was carrying out the provisions of an executive order signed by President Trump for “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.”

Advertisement

El Capitan had a starring role in “Free Solo,” the Oscar-winning 2018 documentary about the climber Alex Honnold’s quest to reach the top of the landmark without a rope.

Ms. Oakley, who estimated that she had climbed El Capitan more than 20 times, said the cliff is a statement in its own right, especially when driving into Yosemite Valley.

“It is right smack dab in your face,” she said.

Continue Reading

News

Meta plans to invest $15bn in Scale AI in bid to catch up to rivals

Published

on

Meta plans to invest bn in Scale AI in bid to catch up to rivals

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Meta plans to invest about $15bn in data-labelling start-up Scale AI and hire the group’s co-founder and top researchers, in one of the biggest deals of its kind as the Big Tech company seeks to catch up with rivals.

The deal, which could be announced as soon as Wednesday, would give Meta a 49 per cent stake in Scale AI and value the start-up at roughly $28bn, according to people with knowledge of the matter. It would mark the second consecutive year that Scale AI has doubled its valuation.

The investment in Scale AI and attempt to poach its top talent was part of Meta’s plan to build a “superintelligence” lab that would outperform OpenAI, Anthropic and Google, which are also developing models they claim will exceed human intelligence, according to one of the people.

Advertisement

Scale AI declined to comment, and Meta did not respond to a request for comment.

The launch of Meta’s latest large language model, Llama 4, underwhelmed critics after it underperformed on independent reasoning and coding benchmarks.

Meanwhile, competitors such as Google, OpenAI and Anthropic have each unveiled a new generation of powerful “reasoning” models, which solve problems by breaking them down step by step. Meta is also facing pressure from open source competitors such as China’s DeepSeek that have built powerful models for a fraction of the cost.

Meta, with a market capitalisation of nearly $2tn, has invested heavily in generative artificial intelligence. But progress has been halting and chief executive Mark Zuckerberg has reorganised the efforts multiple times. Meta announced in April the departure of Joelle Pineau, vice-president of AI research.

Alexandr Wang, a 28-year-old paper billionaire who co-founded Scale AI in 2016, is set to join Meta’s “superintelligence” lab, the details of which were first reported by The New York Times. Details of Meta’s investment were first reported by Bloomberg and The Information.

Advertisement

Scale AI’s core business involves manually labelling the data that is used to train advanced AI models to ensure it is accurate.

Wang has forged relationships with Silicon Valley’s biggest investors and technologists, including OpenAI’s Sam Altman, and has positioned Scale AI to serve companies developing autonomous vehicles and more recently those building generative AI models.

But his talents lie in promoting the company rather than managing its staff or furthering AI research, according to multiple people who have worked with him.

Jason Droege, who joined Scale AI from Uber Eats less than a year ago, was expected to step up from chief strategy officer to chief executive, according to a person with knowledge of the matter.

The fate of Scale AI’s remaining employees is less clear. Wang recently spoke about his desire to take the start-up public, but the potential deal with Meta casts uncertainty over that goal.

Advertisement

Scale AI had been attempting to broaden its revenue sources following investor concerns about its concentrated services, according to one person with knowledge of the matter. The group has increasingly focused on building custom applications for enterprises and bidding for government contracts.

Last year, Microsoft paid $650mn to hire Inflection boss Mustafa Suleyman and his top lieutenants, and to license the start-up’s technology. Google also paid $2.7bn for a similar arrangement with Character AI.

The bespoke structures used by the Big Tech groups were partly designed to avoid probes from regulators, according to people with knowledge of the deals. But Google and Microsoft have nonetheless faced scrutiny from antitrust enforcers.

Additional reporting by Hannah Murphy

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Misinformation about LA Ice protests swirls online: ‘Catnip for rightwing agitators’

Published

on

Misinformation about LA Ice protests swirls online: ‘Catnip for rightwing agitators’

Since protests against immigration raids in Los Angeles began, false and misleading claims about the ongoing demonstrations have spread on text-based social networks. Outright lies posted directly to social media mixed with misinformation spread through established channels by the White House as Donald Trump dramatically escalated federal intervention. The stream of undifferentiated real and fake information has painted a picture of the city that forks from reality.

Parts of Los Angeles have seen major protests over the past four days against intensified immigration raids by the US president’s administration. On Saturday, dramatic photos from downtown Los Angeles showed cars set aflame amid confrontations with law enforcement. Many posts promoted the perception that mayhem and violence had overtaken the entirety of Los Angeles, even though confrontations with law enforcement and vandalism remained confined to a small part of the sprawling city. Trump has deployed 2,000 members of the national guard to the city without requesting consent from California’s governor Gavin Newsom, which provoked the state to sue for an alleged violation of sovereignty. The defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, has also ordered the US military to deploy approximately 700 Marines to the city.

Amid the street-level and legal conflicts, misinformation is proliferating. Though lies have long played a part in civil and military conflicts, social media often acts as an accelerant, with facts failing to spread as quickly as their counterparts, a dynamic that has played out with the recent wildfires in Los Angeles, a devastating hurricane in North Carolina and the coronavirus pandemic.

Among the most egregious examples were conservative and pro-Russian accounts circulating a video of Mexican president, Claudia Sheinbaum, from before the protests with the claim that she incited and supported the protests, which have featured Mexican flags, according to the misinformation watchdog Newsguard. The misleading posts – made on Twitter/X by conservative commentator Benny Johnson on pro-Trump sites such as WLTReport.com or Russian state-owned sites such as Rg.ru – have received millions of views, according to the organization. Sheinbaum in fact told reporters on 9 June: “We do not agree with violent actions as a form of protest … We call on the Mexican community to act pacifically.”

A post about bricks stirs a mixture of real and fake news

Conspiratorial conservatives are grasping at familiar bogeymen. A post to X on Saturday claiming that “Soros-funded organizations” had dropped off pallets of bricks near Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) facilities received more than 9,500 retweets and was viewed more than 800,000 times. Democratic megadonor George Soros appears as a consistent specter in rightwing conspiracy theories, and the post likewise attributed the supply drop to LA mayor, Karen Bass, and California governor, Gavin Newsom.

Advertisement

“It’s Civil War!!” the post read.

The photo of stacked bricks originates from a Malaysian construction supply company, and the hoax about bricks being supplied to protesters has spread repeatedly since the 2020 Black Lives Matter demonstrations in the US. X users appended a “community note” fact-checking the tweet. X’s native AI chatbot, Grok, also provided fact-checks when prompted to evaluate the veracity of the post.

In response to the hoax photo, some X users replied with links to real footage from the protests that showed protesters hammering at concrete bollards, mixing false and true and reducing clarity around what was happening in reality. The independent journalist who posted the footage claimed the protesters were using the material as projectiles against police, though the footage did not show such actions.

The Social Media Lab, a research unit out of Toronto Metropolitan University, posted on Bluesky: “These days, it feels like every time there’s a protest, the old clickbaity ‘pallets of bricks’ hoax shows up right on cue. You know the one, photos or videos of bricks supposedly left out to encourage rioting. It’s catnip for right-wing agitators and grifters.”

Trump and the White House muddy the waters

Trump himself has fed the narrative that the protests are inauthentic and larger than they really are, fueled by outside agitators without legitimate interest in local matters.

Advertisement
skip past newsletter promotion

“These are not protesters, they are troublemakers and insurrectionists,” Trump posted to Truth Social, which was screenshotted and reposted to X by Elon Musk. Others in the administration have made similar points on social media.

A reporter for the Los Angeles Times pointed out that the White House put out a statement about a particular Mexican national being arrested for allegedly assaulting an officer “during the riots”. In fact, Customs and Border Protection agents stopped him before the protests began.

Advertisement

Sowing misleading information, reaping distrust

Trump has increased the number of Ice raids across the country, which has stoked fears of deportations across Los Angeles, heavily populated with immigrants to the US. Per the Social Media Lab, anti-Ice posts also spread misinformation. One post on Bluesky, marked “Breaking”, claimed that federal agents had just arrived at an LA elementary school and tried to question first graders. In fact, the event occurred two months ago. Researchers called the post “rage-farming to push merch”.

The conspiratorial website InfoWars put out a broadcast on X titled: Watch Live: LA ICE Riots Spread To Major Cities Nationwide As Democrat Summer Of Rage Arrives, which attracted more than 40,000 simultaneous listeners when viewed by the Guardian on Tuesday morning. Though protests against deportations have occurred in other cities, the same level of chaos as seen in Los Angeles has not. A broadcast on X by the news outlet Reuters, Los Angeles after fourth night of immigration protests, had drawn just 13,000 viewers at the same time.

The proliferation of misinformation degrades X’s utility as a news source, though Musk continually tweets that it is the top news app in this country or that, most recently Qatar, a minor distinction. Old photos and videos mix with new and sow doubt in legitimate reporting. Since purchasing Twitter and renaming it X in late 2022, Musk has dismantled many of the company’s own initiatives for combatting the proliferation of lies, though he has promoted the user-generated fact-checking feature, “community notes”. During the 2024 US presidential election in particular, the X CEO himself became a hub for the spread of false information, say researchers. In his dozens of posts per day, he posted and reposted incorrect or misleading claims that reached about 2bn views, according to a report from the Center for Countering Digital Hate.

Continue Reading

Trending