Connect with us

News

After the assassination attempt, Trump gets a string of wins : Consider This from NPR

Published

on

After the assassination attempt, Trump gets a string of wins : Consider This from NPR

A man wears a mask of Donald Trump in front of the Alto Lee Adams Sr. U.S. Courthouse in Florida on February 12.

Joe Raedle/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Joe Raedle/Getty Images


A man wears a mask of Donald Trump in front of the Alto Lee Adams Sr. U.S. Courthouse in Florida on February 12.

Joe Raedle/Getty Images

On Monday, Donald Trump became the official presidential nominee of the GOP at the Republican National Convention in Wisconsin.

Within hours of the opening gavel, we also learned who his running mate will be: Ohio Sen. J.D. Vance.

Advertisement

And Trump himself is receiving hearty encouragement from attendees and speakers in Milwaukee, as he recovers from an assassination attempt at a campaign rally on Saturday.

While one branch of the Justice Department continues the investigation into the motive of the man who fired the shots, on Monday morning a federal judge made another stunning announcement: Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, dismissed the entire federal case against the former president involving his handling of classified documents.

The documents in question include top secret materials the former president kept after his term in office. He also allegedly hid those materials from federal investigators.

Cannon’s ruling gives Trump a significant legal victory on the first day of the RNC.

Consider This host Ailsa Chang spoke with NPR Justice Correspondent Carrie Johnson about the legal issues in the ruling and its implications.

Advertisement

You’re reading the Consider This newsletter, which unpacks one major news story each day. Subscribe here to get it delivered to your inbox, and listen to more from the Consider This podcast.

Delegates are seen on the floor during the first day of the 2024 Republican National Convention.

Angela Weiss/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Angela Weiss/AFP via Getty Images

A surprise end to the classified documents case

Judge Cannon says the special counsel in this case, Jack Smith, was appointed unconstitutionally, and he lacked the power to bring this prosecution. Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed Smith back in 2022, but Judge Cannon says that only Congress or the president have that authority. She also says the way the special counsel has been funded is improper.

Judge Cannon’s opinion cited a recent writing by conservative Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas in a different case against Trump. There, Justice Thomas basically invited Trump and lower courts to take up this issue of the power of the special counsel — which kind of paved the way for this opinion today.

Jesse Panuccio is a former Justice Department official in the Trump administration. He says Cannon wrote a serious opinion and was right to question the special counsel’s authority:

Advertisement

“Mr. Smith is a private citizen who has not been vetted by the United States Senate, not been appointed by the president, exercising the full power of a United States attorney, which is vast — which is the power to prosecute and imprison people, in this case the former president.”

Johnson says the practical effect of the judge’s ruling is to throw out the whole case, not just against Trump but also his co-defendants — his aides at the Mar-a-Lago resort.

But the Justice Department has the power to appeal, and Johnson says there’s good reason to think it will. Judge Cannon has been reversed by a conservative appeals court already in this case.

Many other federal courts that have considered this issue — under the appointments clause of the U.S. Constitution — have all sided with the Justice Department.

Trump cheered the move and called for the dismissal of the other three criminal cases against him. He falsely claimed all of these prosecutions are coordinated political attacks and election interference by his opponent, President Joe Biden.But two of the cases are handled by state authorities — and the other two are overseen by the Justice Department, which says Biden has had no involvement.

Advertisement

A staffer displays Trump signs on the floor during the first day of the 2024 Republican National Convention.

Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images

Advertisement

Where Trump stands legally

Johnson says if other courts follow this reasoning from Judge Cannon, it could mean both federal cases against Trump — the Florida case and the one in Washington over January 6th — are over. But it also has implications for the way the Justice Department has investigated sensitive allegations against political figures since the Nixon era. Lawyer Matthew Seligman says what’s at stake is every prosecution brought by a special counsel:

“The Department of Justice as an institution has an overwhelming interest in defending the constitutionality and lawfulness of special counsels in general. Not just because of the January 6th case, but because there have been dozens of these special counsels and special prosecutors over the last decades.”

The classified documents prosecution of Trump had been considered the strongest of the four cases against the former president. The bulk of the case in Florida relates to behavior by Trump after he left the White House, allegedly taking secret documents to his Florida resort, storing them in bathrooms and ballrooms where any guests could wander in and then refusing to hand over the papers when the Justice Department asked — even after the FBI searched the property.

Former prosecutors said that was as close to an open-and-shut case as the DOJ might get. Now, Johnson says at best there will be a lot more delay:

Advertisement

“And if Trump regains the White House, he could direct his attorney general to drop any appeal and bury this case for good.”

This episode was produced by Brianna Scott and Kai McNamee. It was edited by Patrick Jarenwattananon. Our executive producer is Sami Yenigun.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Milwaukee Is a Beach Town? See How Well You Know the Republicans' Host City.

Published

on

Milwaukee Is a Beach Town? See How Well You Know the Republicans' Host City.

The Republican National Convention is underway in Milwaukee, the largest city in the key swing state of Wisconsin. The four-day affair has put the city in an international spotlight just four years after Covid-19 spoiled the Democrats’ plans to hold their own convention in Milwaukee. But how much do you know about the host city? Take our quiz to find out.

Continue Reading

News

Intel venture arm’s China tech stakes raises alarm in Washington

Published

on

Intel venture arm’s China tech stakes raises alarm in Washington

Intel’s venture capital arm has emerged as one of the most active foreign investors in Chinese artificial intelligence and semiconductor start-ups, at a time the $147bn chipmaker receives billions of dollars from Washington to fund a technological arms race with Beijing.

Intel Capital owns stakes in 43 China-based technology start-ups, according to an FT analysis of its portfolio. Since the venture fund was launched in the early 1990s, it has invested in more than 120 Chinese groups, according to data provider Crunchbase.

The fund, which invests off the chipmaker’s balance sheet, has continued to back fledgling Chinese companies in the past year, even as many of its American peers exited the market under pressure from US authorities.

In February Intel Capital invested in a $20mn fundraising round by Shenzhen-based AI-Link, a 5G and cloud infrastructure platform, and last year led a $91mn round for Shanghai-headquartered North Ocean Photonics, a maker of micro-optics hardware.

Rising geopolitical tensions between Washington and Beijing have led to greater scrutiny of private investment flows between the two economic powers as they jostle for technological and military supremacy.

Advertisement

In June, the Biden administration unveiled rules to curb US financing for Chinese technology that could have military purposes, such as AI, quantum computing and semiconductors. The regulations are expected to be finalised this year.

Intel Capital’s “investments were poster children that helped build consensus for the outbound restrictions”, according to one person familiar with the Biden administration’s thinking on the new rules.

Its current investments in China include around 16 AI start-ups and 15 in the semiconductor industry, as well as companies developing cloud services, electric vehicles, telecoms, virtual reality systems and batteries.

Intel Capital may be forced to divest from some companies once the US regulations take effect, though the US Treasury is examining whether to include some exemptions for some venture capital transactions.

However, the US group has slowed down its dealmaking in China over the past 18 months, according to data provider ITjuzi, completing just three deals since the start of 2023. Investment controls and a slowdown in the Chinese economy, as well as lasting repercussions from Beijing’s crackdown on tech companies, have hit start-up valuations and viability.

Advertisement

A report by a US House China committee on the Chinese Communist party in February said that American venture capital firms had invested billions of dollars into companies that were fuelling China’s “military, surveillance state and Uyghur genocide”. This includes funnelling $1.9bn into AI companies and a further $1.2bn into semiconductors.

The report singled out five US venture firms — Sequoia, GGV, GSR Ventures, Qualcomm Ventures and Walden International — but did not mention Intel Capital, despite the fund becoming one of the largest US investors in China after the departure of some of its rivals.

Intel Capital is “way more active” than Qualcomm’s venture arm in China, said the head of a large US fund with a long history of doing business in China. “Intel is active in everything.”

John Moolenaar, Republican head of the House China committee, said the case highlighted the need for tighter regulation.

“The Chinese Communist party remembers the old communist slogan that ‘the capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them’,” said Moolenaar. “We need strong outbound capital restrictions to prevent American firms from investing in companies closely tied to the CCP’s armed forces.”

Advertisement

Intel Capital declined to comment.

Sequoia Capital and GGV Capital, two of the largest US venture investors in China, spun out their Chinese businesses last year amid the mounting political pressure. Qualcomm, Walden and GSR also continue to invest in Chinese start-ups.

In March Intel received about $20bn in grants and loans from the US to fund an expansion of its semiconductor factories, the largest award from the government’s 2022 Chips and Science Act designed to enhance the domestic chip industry. The package will support more than $100bn in US investments from Intel for advanced chipmaking facilities, including building mega-plants in Ohio and Arizona.

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Nasdaq-listed Intel has a large China business, where it employs around 12,000 people and accounted for 27 per cent of global revenue in 2023.

Advertisement

Chinese multinational Lenovo is one of the three largest customers of its chips, alongside Dell and HP, generating 11 per cent of global revenue. Last month, Intel’s China arm acquired a 3 per cent stake in Shenzhen telecoms equipment maker Luxshare.

Intel Capital’s China business is run by Tianlin Wang, a life-long Intel employee and head of the unit since 2017. It has six other investment directors in the country. Globally, Intel Capital has invested more than $20bn since the early 1990s and is led by Anthony Lin in San Francisco.

Intel Capital has participated in Chinese start-up deals worth a total $1.4bn since 2015, according to data from PitchBook. That figure relates to the total value of the deals rather than Intel Capital’s individual contribution, which the firm does not make public.

As early as 2014, Intel Capital announced it had invested $670mn in more than 110 Chinese technology companies, and in 2015 alone it gave $67mn to eight Chinese tech companies. Since then, Intel Capital has not publicly revealed the scale of its investments in China.

A report in February 2023 by the US Center for Security and Emerging Technology, a DC think-tank, into the national security risks associated with US investment in Chinese AI companies, found that Intel Capital participated in 11 deals for such companies between 2015 and 2021. A person close to Intel said there were only four AI deals during this time.

Advertisement

In some cases, the US fund obtained a board seat, such as at Horizon Robotics, a chipmaker, and Eeasy Tech, which designs AI chips for facial recognition and that was also backed by the Zhuhai provincial government.

“Intel Capital’s investments in Chinese AI firms have led to the formation of strategic collaborations that could benefit the Chinese companies in a way that complements Chinese government strategies,” that report said.

In one case, Intel Capital helped fund the creation of a Chinese company that was later sanctioned by the US. The fund was one of the earliest investors in AI voice recognition group iFlytek, acquiring a 3 per cent stake in 2002 before selling the shareholding two years later. The company was one of six Chinese companies banned by the US in 2019 for their roles in alleged human rights abuses in Xinjiang.

“The fear of missing out in the AI era has created a sense of urgency for Intel Capital,” said the head of a rival Chinese venture firm that has co-invested alongside them. “Intel is under such fierce competition in AI in the US, they can’t afford to be left behind, so they have to look around the world for where to deploy money into AI and China is one of the very few options.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Election 2024 Polls: Minnesota

Published

on

Election 2024 Polls: Minnesota

About our polling averages

Our averages include polls collected by The New York Times and by FiveThirtyEight. The estimates adjust for a variety of factors, including the recency and sample size of a poll, whether a poll represents likely voters, and whether other polls have shifted since a poll was conducted.

We also evaluate whether each pollster: Has a track record of accuracy in recent electionsIs a member of a professional polling organizationConducts probability-based sampling

These elements factor into how much weight each poll gets in the average. And we consider pollsters that meet at least two of the three criteria to be “select pollsters,” so long as they are conducting polls for nonpartisan sponsors. Read more about our methodology.

The Times conducts its own national and state polls in partnership with Siena College. Those polls are included in the averages. Follow Times/Siena polling here.

Advertisement

Sources: Polling averages by The New York Times. Individual polls collected by FiveThirtyEight and The Times.

Continue Reading

Trending