There is currently a rather touching, to me anyway, ad campaign being run by the VDP, the association of elite wine producers in Germany.

It consists of an Instagram blitz and about 20 digital posters in German cities, each depicting a young(ish) winegrower, with a quote from each of them explaining why they have chosen their career.

Typically, they have taken over relatively small enterprises from their parents and are doing the hard work in the vineyard and cellar themselves. Julian Huber of the famous Bernhard Huber estate in Baden producing Germanic answers to red and white burgundy is disarmingly modest: “I probably wouldn’t have been good for anything else.”

Eleventh-generation grower Peter Jakob Kühn in the Rheingau was famously a pioneer of organic viticulture there, back in the early 1990s. His son Peter Bernhard Kühn waxes philosophical with his contribution: “I learn, love and hate, am king and servant, find freedom and connection.” Kai Schätzel in Rheinhessen is working in the family estate for the most altruistic of reasons: “I believe that good agriculture can save the world.”

It would be misleading, however, to suggest that only the sons inherit the earth at German family wine estates. Despite having three older brothers, it is Catharina Mauritz who has taken over the Domdechant Werner estate in the Rheingau from her father, Franz Michel. Katharina Prüm long ago succeeded her father, Manfred, at the famous JJ Prüm estate in the Mosel, making wines that are noticeably fruitier and more approachable in their youth. Upstream in the Saar valley Dorothee Zilliken has taken over the reins from her father, Hanno. She and her husband, Philipp, are deliberately making wines that are even lighter, and perceptibly drier, than those of the previous generation.

The campaign may be partly in response to the labour shortage affecting wine production in Germany, as throughout the wine world. But according to the VDP, aware that there are many easier jobs than winegrowing, it is “a political message designed to generate enthusiasm and empowerment among nature, culture and craft lovers”. It reflects today’s spirit of co-operation among VDP members, something I was assured on a recent visit there was not that common a generation or two ago.

Part of what I love about winegrowing is that its appeal is strong enough to persuade young, well-travelled, well-educated people to adopt a physically demanding outdoor profession in which they are pitted against a more powerful, increasingly unpredictable force: nature. Winegrowing is an art, a craft and nowadays has to be a science too.

Younger generations of vintners not only routinely attend top wine schools but also intern at some of the world’s finest wine estates, where they soak up the latest practicalities of grape-growing and winemaking.

Wine writer and retired producer Armin Diel of Schlossgut Diel in the Nahe told me that his 2001 Christmas present to his daughter Caroline, now in charge of the estate with her French husband, Sylvain Taurisson-Diel, was a handwritten letter presented on a silver plate from Aubert de Villaine of Burgundy’s most famous estate Domaine de la Romanée-Conti, inviting her to intern during the 2002 harvest.

Nature can be a cruel adversary. At this year’s Weinbörse wine fair in Mainz, where almost 1,700 of the latest releases were shown by the great majority of the VDP’s 200 members, many of the producers were still reeling from especially savage frosts a few days earlier. The Zillikens reckon to have lost up to 70 per cent of their potential 2024 crop, so many buds were turned to ice on the vine.

In the nearby Ruwer valley, the famous vineyards of the Maximin Grünhaus estate were also badly hit. But Maximin von Schubert, who has taken over from his father, Carl von Schubert, and continues the estate’s diversification into red wine production thanks to some rather lovely Pinot Noir plant material imported from Burgundy, has taken out a form of frost insurance. He has deliberately bought land round about the original estate vineyards with different expositions and elevations, thereby reducing the likelihood of their all being frosted at the same time.

If there were a stylistic generalisation to be made about the wines of the current generation of VDP members, it is that they seem to be following German consumer taste in making drier and drier wines. Sweetness in German wine is all too readily associated with the darkest days of the industry in the 1970s and early 1980s in the wake of the 1971 German Wine Law that promoted sweetness above all else, including true quality.

It has taken years of discussion, largely on the part of the VDP, to evolve a system that prizes geography and balance above the Kabinett, Spätlese and Auslese categories defined by residual sugar levels. Today there is also a labelling system more like Burgundy’s in which the most admired wines, and the ones likely to benefit from the finest grapes, are those from the most specific locations: single-vineyard wines.

Caroline Diel, for instance, is now making wines that are bone dry and distinctly chewy in youth so that she has completely changed the estate’s release timetable. Today’s Schlossgut Diel wines enjoy much longer ageing in bottle before being put on the market. Unlike most other producers in Mainz she had no 2023 whites to show and even her 2022s were still tightly textured.

The same phenomenon is evident in the wines being made by Sebastian Fürst, son of Paul of the Rudolf Fürst estate in Franken. Paul was a pioneer of fine Pinot Noir, called Spätburgunder in Germany. Sebastian, who joined him in 2007, is typical of his generation, having studied viticulture and oenology at Geisenheim university and having worked in wineries in Burgundy, Alsace, Spain, South Africa and other top addresses in Germany. His 2022 Spätburgunders are particularly youthful, yet clearly very promising.

Sebastian Fürst also displays the environmental awareness of his generation, a phenomenon vigorously promoted within the VDP by Johannes Hasselbach, who worked in finance before coming back to his family’s Gunderloch estate in Rheinhessen. On his watch there seems to be new energy and polish to the wines from their famous vineyards on the Rhine.

Like so many of his contemporaries, Hasselbach treasures the flavours that result from the yeasts naturally present in the vineyard and winery above those that result from specially cultured yeasts that have been bought in.

Jan Eymael came back to Weingut Pfeffingen in the Pfalz from interning at Château Smith Haut Lafitte in Bordeaux with his wife, Karin, and realised he really liked the smell of their blend of Sauvignon Blanc and Sémillon in the fermentation vat. As a result he developed a new, much more opulent style for the white they make from their mature Scheurebe vines.

As a result of all these outside influences, German wine may be more varied than it was in the 1970s sugar-water era, but it is so much better.

Tasting notes, scores and suggested drink dates on Purple Pages of JancisRobinson.com. International stockists on Wine-searcher.com

Follow @FTMag to find out about our latest stories first and subscribe to our podcast Life and Art wherever you listen

WASHINGTON — Former President Donald Trump is used to warm welcomes by loyal supporters at speaking events on the campaign trail.

This weekend might be different.

Trump is set to deliver a speech Saturday at the 2024 Libertarian National Convention, and if Friday night’s program is any indication, he could be facing a hostile crowd.

Former GOP presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy, who quickly endorsed Trump after dropping out, was booed during his convention remarks Friday night when he mentioned Trump.

“I’m speaking to you as a libertarian at my own core. I have gotten to know Donald Trump over the course of the last several years and the last several months,” Ramaswamy said as many in the crowd booed in response.

Ramaswamy continued, urging the audience of about 100 to ask themselves if they wanted to influence the next administration.

Separately, as Libertarian party members reviewed procedures and motions, a person at a microphone proposed that “we go tell Donald Trump to go f— himself.”

The audience cheered and roared with applause.

“That was my motion too!” another man yelled. “We are a Libertarian convention looking to nominate Libertarians. We do not need to give that time to non-Libertarians.”

Behind the two men, a third chanted, “F— Donald Trump.”

A spokesperson for the Trump campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the crowd’s sentiments toward the presumptive Republican nominee for president.

Several voters watching speeches at the convention, where independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. spoke, said they were disillusioned with both major political parties.

Avi Rachlin, a 22-year-old Michigan voter, said he cast a ballot for Trump in 2020 but plans to vote for the Libertarian candidate in November.

“People say that a third party vote is a wasted vote. You’re voting for the other team,” Rachlin said on Friday. “And I don’t see it that way. I think it sends a strong message of disapproval with the current contenders for both offices.”

John Burke Stringfellow, a Virginia voter who said he backed Trump in 2016 and then President Joe Biden in 2020, said he thought a rematch between the two candidates is “terrible.”

“I say ditch the rematch and go for a three match,” he said.

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.

The UN’s top court has ordered Israel to “immediately halt” its military offensive in Rafah, the southern Gazan city that had become a refuge for more than 1mn civilians since the war between Israel and Hamas erupted last year.

Despite intense international pressure to refrain, Israeli forces entered the city earlier this month, with officials insisting the assault was necessary to defeat Hamas, which triggered the war with its October 7 attack on Israel.

However, in an order issued in response to an urgent request brought by South Africa, the International Court of Justice on Friday said conditions in Rafah were “disastrous”, and instructed Israel to stop.

The court also ordered Israel to reopen the Rafah crossing between Gaza and Egypt to allow “unhindered provision at scale of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance”, and to allow investigators into the enclave.

The ICJ has no way of enforcing its orders — Russia continues to flout the court’s 2022 order to suspend its military operations in Ukraine. But Friday’s order adds to intense international pressure on Israel over its war in Gaza, which has fuelled a humanitarian catastrophe in the enclave.

Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was due to discuss the order with senior officials on Friday, his office said.

Far-right finance minister Bezalel Smotrich said Israel would not agree to stop the war in Gaza. “Those who demand that the State of Israel stop the war, demand that it decree itself to cease to exist,” he wrote on the social media platform X. “If we lay down our weapons, the enemy will reach the beds of our children and women throughout the country.”

But internationally, the pressure to end the war is growing.

The EU’s chief diplomat said the ICJ’s ruling on Friday would force the bloc to choose between supporting “rule of law [or] . . . Israel”.

“We will have to choose between our support for international institutions and the rule of law, and our support for Israel,” Josep Borrell told a conference in Florence, adding that either choice was “going to be quite difficult”.

“We’ve been clear and consistent on our position on Rafah,” a spokesperson for the White House’s National Security Council told the Financial Times, when asked about the US response to the ICJ ruling. The US has opposed Israel’s full invasion of Rafah without a plan to protect civilians.

On Monday the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court — which deals with crimes by individuals rather than states — sought arrest warrants for Netanyahu and defence minister Yoav Gallant, and three Hamas leaders, saying he had “reasonable grounds to believe” they were responsible for alleged war crimes.

On Wednesday, Spain, Norway and Ireland pledged to recognise a Palestinian state next week. Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said that while Israel had a right to defend itself, its assault on Gaza, which has killed more than 35,000 people, according to Palestinian officials, was putting a two-state solution “in danger”.

Netanyahu dismissed the ICC prosecutor’s move as “a distortion of reality” and insisted Israel would continue its offensive in Gaza — which it launched in response to Hamas’s October 7 attack, during which militants killed 1,200 people, and took another 250 hostage, according to Israeli officials — regardless of international criticism.

Gallant on Thursday said Israel was stepping up its assault on Rafah, and that 1mn civilians had left the city since Israel began its operation there on May 7.

Heavy Israeli air strikes were reported in Rafah in the wake of the ICJ ruling on Friday, according to Palestinian eyewitnesses and social media; Israeli analysts speculated the target was the Hamas brigade commander for the area.

South Africa’s request is part of a case it brought last year alleging Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. Israel has vehemently denied the charges, and the ICJ is unlikely to issue a final decision in the case for years.

But the court has twice issued interim orders in the case. In January, it told Israel to comply with international law on genocide, and in March, to ensure more food and humanitarian assistance reached Palestinians in Gaza, warning that famine was “setting in”.

Israel does not recognise the ICC. But it is a member of the ICJ, and as such is meant to implement its orders.