Connect with us

Wisconsin

Wisconsin GOP Sen. Johnson hauls in $7.1 million over the past three months for his reelection bid

Published

on

Wisconsin GOP Sen. Johnson hauls in .1 million over the past three months for his reelection bid


NEWNow you can hearken to Fox Information articles!

EXCLUSIVE: Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin seems to be making up for misplaced time.

The 2-term Republican senator whom Democrats are focusing on as he runs for reelection in November’s midterms raked in $7.1 million within the January-March first quarter of fundraising, based on figures shared first with Fox Information on Thursday.

Johnson’s haul is a large improve from the $711,498 he introduced in in the course of the closing three months of final 12 months. However that was earlier than Johnson formally declared his candidacy for reelection, which he introduced on Jan. 9, ending months of hypothesis relating to his 2022 intentions.

Advertisement

SEN. RON JOHNSON OF WISCONSIN ANNOUNCES 2022 RE-ELECTION

The senator introduced in his cash by his joint fundraising committee with the Nationwide Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), his reelection marketing campaign, and his management PAC. 

Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wisc., takes his seat for the Senate International Relations Subcommittee on Europe and Regional Safety Cooperation Subcommittee listening to within the Dirksen Senate Workplace Constructing on Wednesday, Feb. 16, 2022. (Invoice Clark/CQ-Roll Name, Inc through Getty Photos).
(Invoice Clark/CQ-Roll Name, Inc through Getty Photos)

Johnson’s political crew highlighted that the senator’s fundraising in the course of the first quarter got here from 71,000 whole contributions from over 40,000 donors. And showcasing the senator’s grassroots enchantment, they famous that 95% of donations had been underneath $200 and that $2.1 million was raised on-line, with the typical digital donation of simply $38.

“Senator Johnson’s robust fundraising quarter exhibits broad assist for his marketing campaign,” marketing campaign communications director Jake Wilkins touted.

Advertisement

TOP GOP JEWISH ORGANIZATION BACKS JOHNSON’S REELECTION RUN

Johnson, a conservative senator and robust supporter of former President Donald Trump, was first elected within the 2010 Tea Celebration-fueled crimson wave, defeating three-term Democratic Sen. Russ Feingold. 

As he gained reelection by edging Feingold of their 2016 rematch, Johnson vowed to solely serve two phrases. However final 12 months, with the Democrats controlling the White Home and each homes of Congress, the senator stated occasions had modified.

WHO’S UP AND DOWN IN THE LATEST FOX NEWS 2022 POWER RANKINGS 

Johnson stirred controversy final 12 months by questioning COVID-19 vaccines, seemingly downplaying the results of local weather change, and asserting that he by no means felt threatened by the rioters that stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 as they tried to disrupt congressional certification of President Biden’s Electoral School victory over Trump. Johnson praised those that attacked the Capitol as individuals who “love this nation.”

Advertisement

Trump endorsed Johnson’s reelection in April of final 12 months, eight months earlier than the senator introduced he’d search one other time period.

Former President Donald Trump speaks during the 'Save America' rally at the Montgomery County Fairgrounds on January 29, 2022 in Conroe, Texas.  (Photo by Brandon Bell/Getty Images)

Former President Donald Trump speaks in the course of the ‘Save America’ rally on the Montgomery County Fairgrounds on January 29, 2022 in Conroe, Texas.  (Photograph by Brandon Bell/Getty Photos)
(Photograph by Brandon Bell/Getty Photos)

The Senate contest in Wisconsin – a key battleground state that Biden narrowly carried within the 2020 election – is one in all a handful of contests that would finally determine which get together controls the Senate. Two of high three nonpartisan political handicappers rank the race as “lean Republican,” with the third ranking it a toss-up.

The chamber is at the moment break up 50/50 between the 2 main political events, however the Democrats maintain the bulk because of the tie-breaking vote of Vice President Kamala Harris by her constitutional function as president of the Senate. Which means the GOP wants a internet achieve of only one seat to reclaim the bulk it misplaced when it was swept within the January 2021 twin Senate runoff contests in Georgia. 

Practically a dozen Democratic candidates are in search of their get together’s Senate nomination, together with Wisconsin Lt. Gov. Mandela Barnes, who’s the polling front-runner in his get together’s main.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Johnson is utilizing fundraising sources “to counter the lies and distortions of a number of Democrat candidates, liberal darkish cash teams, and biased media,” Wilkins argued. “Since Democrats can’t defend the disastrous outcomes of their insurance policies – file gasoline costs, 40-year excessive inflation, a flood of unlawful immigration, rising crime, and a weakened America – they resort to the politics of non-public destruction.”

And he emphasised that Johnson “will proceed to inform the reality, concentrate on the problems that concern Wisconsinites, and spotlight his file of serious accomplishments.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Wisconsin

Here is the 2025 recruiting class that has signed with Wisconsin football

Published

on

Here is the 2025 recruiting class that has signed with Wisconsin football


play

MADISON – Wednesday, Dec. 4, is the first day of the early signing period for college football. Here are 24 players who signed with Wisconsin on Wednesday morning. The early signing period ends Friday, Dec. 6.

Hometown: Charlotte, North Carolina.

Advertisement

Height: 6-1. Weight: 180.

Carter Smith, quarterback

Hometown: Fort Myers, Florida.

Height: 6-3. Weight: 185.

Jaylen Williams, defensive lineman

Hometown: Palatine, Illinois.

Height: 6-6. Weight: 250

Advertisement

Emmett Bork, tight end

Hometown: Oconomowoc, Wisconsin.

Height: 6-6. Weight: 245.

Drayden Pavey, defensive tackle

Hometown: Cincinnati, Ohio

Height: 6-3. Weight: 294.

Advertisement

Xavier Ukponu, defensive tackle

Hometown: Denton, Texas.

Height: 6-3. Weight: 300.

Hardy Watts, offensive lineman

Hometown: Brookline, Massachusetts.

Height: 6-5. Weight: 305.

Nicolas Clayton, defensive end  

Hometown: Gainesville, Florida.

Advertisement

Height: 6-5. Weight: 215.

Eugene Hilton Jr., receiver

Hometown: Zionsville, Indiana.

Height: 6-1. Weight: 175.

Mason Posa, inside linebacker

Hometown: Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Height: 6-3. Weight: 210.

Advertisement

Torin Pettaway, defensive lineman

Hometown: Middleton, Wisconsin.

Height: 6-5. Weight: 285.

Nizyi Davis, tight end

Hometown: Indianapolis.

Height: 6-6. Weight: 210.

Jahmare Washington, defensive back

Hometown: Chicago.

Advertisement

Height: 6-2. Weight: 170.

Nolan Davenport, offensive lineman

Hometown: Massillon, Ohio.

Height: 6-6. Weight: 280.

Logan Powell, offensive lineman

Hometown: Phoenix.     

Height: 6-5. Weight: 290.

Advertisement

Luke Emmerich, safety

Hometown: Monticello, Minnesota.

Height: 6-1. Weight: 195.

Cam Clark, offensive lineman

Hometown: Dexter, Michigan.

Height: 6-7. Weight: 290.

Grant Dean, safety

Hometown: Neenah, Wisconsin.     

Advertisement

Height: 6-1. Weight: 190.

Sam Lateju, outside linebacker

Hometown: Lagos, Nigeria.

Height: 6-5. Weight: 230.

Jaimier Scott, defensive back

Hometown: Cincinnati.

Height: 6-1. Weight: 179.

Advertisement

Cooper Catalano, inside linebacker

Hometown: Germantown, Wisconsin.

Height: 6-2. Weight: 215.

Michael Roeske, offensive lineman

Hometown: Wautoma, Wisconsin.

Height: 6-8. Weight: 295.

Remington Moss, defensive back

Hometown: Fredericksburg, Virginia.

Advertisement

Height: 6-3. Weight: 192.

Landyn Locke, quarterback

Hometown: Rockwall, Texas.

Height: 6-4. Weight: 185.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Takeaways from No.11 Wisconsin's 67-64 Loss to Michigan

Published

on

Takeaways from No.11 Wisconsin's 67-64 Loss to Michigan


Takeaways from No.11 Wisconsin’s 67-64 Loss to Michigan

MADISON, Wis. – Michigan 7-footers Vlad Goldin and Danny Wolf were working on creating a nickname for their tandem, a partnership that could potentially cause matchup nightmares throughout the Big Ten schedule.

Here’s one they can workshop – Badger Bashers.

Goldin and Wolf controlled the low post, picked apart Wisconsin’s defensive mistakes, and made Wisconsin center Steven Crowl a non-factor in a 67-64 victory at the Kohl Center.

Advertisement

It was a disappointing setback for the Badgers (8-1, 0-1 Big Ten), which shut down Michigan guards but struggled to hit open shots consistently against the Wolverines’ top-10-rated defense. It doesn’t get any easier for the Badgers considering No.5 Marquette has a defense that is rated five spots better than the Wolverines.

“I think we’re going to respond great,” guard John Blackwell said. “We have a great group of vets who have been through this. You’re not going to win every game. We’re going to be just fine. We’re going to build off this loss, take it on the chin, and keep moving forward.”

Here are my takeaways from the Kohl Center.

Advertisement

Goldin and Wolf were superior to Crowl and Winter

In a battle of teams with 7-foot frontcourts, it was no contest.

Wolf is described as a 7-foot point guard because of how he handles basketball. Goldin is all muscle in the low post. Together, they pummeled Wisconsin relentlessly in the second half once Crowl got into foul trouble and created a mismatch problem.

Wolf was active early with nine points, six rebounds, and five blocks. Goldin struggled around the rim in going 2-for-7. Both players exploited UW’s interior with Wolf going 4-for-6 with five assists and Goldin going 7-for-9, mostly on dunks at the rim. The duo scored 28 of Michigan’s 41 second-half points and 44 of its 67, as Crowl and Winter got lost guarding the pick-and-roll or not creating enough resistance on the player rolling toward the basket.

That was evident late as Goldin got behind Wisconsin’s defense for easy baskets at the rim to allow Michigan to answer UW’s offense and take control over the final three minutes.

“We weren’t physical enough,” forward Nolan Winter said. “We weren’t intent on the ball screen with what we were doing. It’s on both of us as bigs. We know it. We know we’ve got to be better, and Steven knows he’s got to be out of foul trouble. We need him out there and the presence he brings us. It’s poor communication.

Advertisement

“They’re two great 7-footers coming off ball screens. They know what they’re doing, but we got to handle that a lot better.”

Crowl and Winter were hoping Tuesday would be their big coming-out party. The end of the first half showed some promise. With John Tonje on the bench because of foul trouble for the final 6:02, Crowl and Winter helped the Badgers go on a 13-6 run entering the half largely by creating and finding space.

Blackwell drew a double team on the low block and split with a bounce pass to Crowl for an easy finish off the glass. Kamari McGee successfully probed the double team as well, drawing Goldin away from the basket to stop dribble penetration before bouncing a pass to Winter. With guard Tre Donaldson late on the switch, Winter had an easy dunk at the rim. With Blackwell leading the break on the next possession, the sophomore attacked the right block, drew the double team, and passed to Winter for another slam.

That allowed Wisconsin to take a six-point lead in the locker room, even though the Badgers shot 32.3 percent in the first half. A lot of those actions were cut off in the second half, as the Badgers went 4-for-14 around the rim and UW’s duo was only 1-for-4 from the floor.

The defensive miscues don’t all fall on the forwards. Wisconsin guards struggled at times guarding rollers and winning individual matchups. The Badgers held Michigan to 6-for-25 from three-point range, but the 18-9 run to start the second half was created by Michigan attacking the paint and converting, wiping out UW’s six-point halftime lead.

Advertisement

“They’re both vets and have been around this for a while,” said Winter, as Michigan shot 61.5 percent in the second half. “Their games really complement each other well. The ball screens created some issues for our defense. They executed really well and they’re both really talented, find one another and finish.”

Blackwell’s Leadership Emerging 

Tonje led Wisconsin in scoring for the seventh time with 18 points (12 in the second half), but the senior didn’t play in control as he’s done in many games throughout the season. Blackwell was a different story with 16 points and nine rebounds, including his work creating off the offensive glass

Blackwell had four offensive rebounds through the first seven games of the season and equaled that total against Michigan, including two on a stretch that showed he’s on his way to becoming the future of Wisconsin’s program.

On consecutive second-half possessions, Blackwell boxed out guard Roddy Gayle Jr. on three-point attempts, secured the loose ball, and finished at the rim. When he hit a step-back jumper on the next trip, Blackwell’s 6-0 run gave UW a 47-44 lead.

UW finished with 16 offensive rebounds that led to 12 second-chance points, a big boost for a team that entered the night 291st nationally in offensive rebounding (9.0 per game).

Advertisement

“His ability to gobble up offensive rebounders and finish in there,” head coach Greg Gard said. “He played a lot of minutes. We needed him on the floor. He did a lot of good things in the second half.”

Blackwell didn’t play perfectly, which his season-high five turnovers would indicate. UW was well under the 17.3 turnovers Michigan forced a game, but the 10 UW turnovers led to 13 Michigan points.

Klesmit in A Deep Freeze

Gard vividly remembered how Max Klesmit drove into the lane and made a play in the paint with a turnaround jumper, putting the Badgers up 64-61 with 2:37 remaining. He likely remembers it because it was the last point UW scored or because it was Klesmit’s only second-half field goal.

Klesmit went 3-for-14 from the floor and 1-for-9 from three, numbers that aren’t pretty but better than his second-half stat line of 1-for-9 and 0-for-6.

The senior missed shots on three consecutive possessions that would have tied the game or put Wisconsin ahead. He badly missed one and barely drew iron on another.

Advertisement

“I think they are good shots, honestly,” Blackwell said. “Max, Kamari, JT, keep shooting the ball. They are great looks. They are going to fall sooner. I was fine with our looks. We just got to get back in the gym and get more reps.”

Wisconsin shot a season-worst 18.8 percent (6-for-27) on threes, a lack of perimeter success that prevented the Badgers from spreading the floor. Not spreading Michigan out prevented the Badgers from attacking gaps and getting to the free throw line, where they went 14-for-19 (the third-fewest makes of the season).

Gard thought Wisconsin forced at least one possession down the stretch, but that Klesmit had open looks. Klesmit’s three-point miss with 22 seconds left was originally supposed to be a possession where the Badgers went for two, but Blackwell drew two defenders and kicked the ball out to the senior.

“Max has made those shots before,” Gard said. “He’s in a slump right now. We got to help him get out of it.”

Gard also bemoaned Winter’s missed free throw with UW down three in three seconds left. With the plan to make the first and miss the second, Gard said UW practiced the exact scenario on Monday and executed the drill.

Advertisement

But the bigger worry is Klesmit, who is shooting career-worst overall (32.6 percent) and from three-point range (25.4). Over the last four games, Klesmit is 9-for-39 from the floor (23.1 percent) and 5-for-28 from the perimeter (17.9).

“You got to keep shooting,” Gard said. “Work on it. You can’t be hesitant, can’t be gun shy. You got to keep working stuff in practice, getting extra shots, just got to work your way out of it.”

By The Numbers

21.2 – Michigan’s first-half shooting percentage. The Wolverines finished at 39.0 percent after going 16-for-26 in the second half.

7:42 – Number of minutes the Wolverines went without a field goal to end the first half

3:02 – Longest field goal drought for Michigan in the second half

Advertisement

19 – Fast break points for Michigan, which outscored the Badgers by 15 in transition

5 – Shot attempts by Crowl, only three of which came from two-point range.

3 – Michigan’s winning streak in the series, tied for the longest against the Badgers since 2000.

_________________________________________________

*Chat about this article in The Badgers’ Den

Advertisement

*Check out our videos, interviews, and Q&As on our YouTube channel

*Subscribe and listen to the BadgerBlitz.com podcast (as seen on Apple, Google, Spotify and wherever you listen to podcasts)

*Follow us on Twitter: @McNamaraRivals, @TheBadgerNation, @RaulV45, @seamus_rohrer, @DonnieSlusher_

*Like us on Facebook





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

A Judge in Wisconsin Just Buried the Last of Scott Walker’s Wing-Nut Legacy

Published

on

A Judge in Wisconsin Just Buried the Last of Scott Walker’s Wing-Nut Legacy


Thirteen years ago, Scott Walker, the goggle-eyed homunculus hired by Koch Industries to manage their midwest subsidiary formerly known as the state of Wisconsin, managed to get his pet legislature to pass the infamous Act 10, which stripped collective-bargaining rights from the state’s public employees. This prompted weeks of massive demonstrations outside the state capitol in Madison, along with an unsuccessful attempt to recall the governor, and it briefly made a star out of the charisma-deprived Walker to the money power. The burst of fame resulted in Walker’s 2016 presidential campaign, which lasted approximately 11 seconds. Walker subsequently faded into the distant quadrants of the Wing-Nut Welfare universe. This week, a judge in Dane County buried the last of his legacy. From the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel:

The effort to overturn Act 10 began in November 2023 when several unions representing public employees filed the lawsuit, citing a “dire situation” in workplaces with issues including low pay, staffing shortages and poor working conditions. Frost agreed. He said he couldn’t sever Act 10’s definition of “public safety employee,” which he said is “irrational and violates the right to equal protection of the laws,” and also keep the rest of Act 10 intact. “I cannot solve Act 10’s constitutional problems by striking the definition of ‘public safety employee,’ leaving the term undefined and leaving the remainder of the law in place,” wrote Frost in Monday’s ruling.

This always was the law’s great flaw, and it results from the fact that Walker didn’t have the cojones to include Wisconsin’s police and fire departments in his union busting and exempted those politically powerful unions from Act 10’s provisions.

Frost added that “Act 10 as written by the Legislature specifically and narrowly defines ‘public safety employee.’ It is that definition which is unconstitutional. The Legislature cites no precedent for this bold argument that I should simply strike the unlawful definition but leave it to an agency and the courts to later define as they see fit. I am unaware of any such precedent (…).” In the earlier ruling on the motion to dismiss the case, Frost pointed out the law treats different groups of public safety employees differently.

“Nobody could provide this Court an explanation that reasonably showed why municipal police and fire and State Troopers are considered public safety employees, but Capitol Police, UW Police and conservation wardens, who have the same authority and do the same work, are not,” Frost said. In his latest ruling, he said the courts cannot decide how the Legislature meant to define a public safety employee in Act 10. The courts, he said, “cannot decide who should be included or excluded, absent guidance from the Legislature.”

Undoubtedly, the courts have not seen the last of this. (Once again, the election that flipped the majority of the state supreme court a couple years ago will play a critical role.) But this week’s ruling was the result of a long fight that certainly was worth making. In a sense, those people never left the capitol lawn.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending