Wisconsin

Wisconsin exposed in humbling loss to Alabama: ‘We got completely obliterated today’

Published

2 years ago

September 15, 2024

Wisconsin exposed in humbling loss to Alabama: ‘We got completely obliterated today’

MADISON, Wis. — Cautious optimism spread among Wisconsin’s football players in the week leading up to a massive home showdown against No. 4 Alabama. It was a game, some players said, they had circled for years — not months — because of the incredible opportunity it would provide to showcase the program’s worthiness on a national stage following four straight disappointing seasons.

What went unsaid is that it also was a game that provided an opportunity to be incredibly exposed.

That’s what happened during Alabama’s 42-10 romp of Wisconsin at Camp Randall Stadium on Saturday, in which Badgers starting quarterback Tyler Van Dyke was knocked out of the game with a right knee injury on the first series. It marked Wisconsin’s worst home defeat in 16 years, a 41-point loss to Penn State in 2008.

One side possessed multiple playmakers and executed at a high level. The other side didn’t. And for a Wisconsin program still trying to move the meter in Luke Fickell’s second season, this was not the way to do it.

“I’ll give you guys the same message I just gave them: If you haven’t had your ass whooped before, you just did,” Fickell said. “They beat us in every phase of the game today.”

Few people outside the program believed Wisconsin would win, which is why the Badgers were two-touchdown underdogs. But this team wasn’t even close, particularly after Alabama struck in two plays late in the second quarter off a missed Wisconsin field goal to take a 21-3 halftime lead. Maybe a healthy Van Dyke would have helped stem the Crimson Tide a little while longer. However, there were simply too many mental and physical errors across the board against a superior foe to think Wisconsin would have pulled off a miracle.

I don’t think running back Jam Miller had enough open space on that 34-yard touchdown run. Crimson Tide absolutely dominating two minutes into the third quarter.
Alabama 28, Wisconsin 3.
— Jesse Temple (@jessetemple) September 14, 2024

A mass exodus from the student section took place as soon as “Jump Around” finished blaring from the loudspeakers following the third quarter, with only a speck of white shirts from the red-and-white fan “Stripe Out” dotting the otherwise empty bleachers. By that time, the Crimson Tide led 35-10.

Wisconsin athletics director Chris McIntosh fired Paul Chryst five games into the 2022 season following a 2-3 start and ultimately hired Fickell from Cincinnati in late November of that year to help restore the program’s championship-level aspirations. Fickell’s average annual salary is $7.8 million, which means he is paid like a top-20 coach. But right now, he doesn’t have a top-20 program or, arguably, even a top-40 program given the way the Badgers have performed.

Although Wisconsin is 2-1, there is no guarantee the Badgers will extend their 22-year bowl game streak because of a daunting schedule with Big Ten play on the horizon. Van Dyke’s injury status further calls into question what the rest of this season looks like. Fickell said Van Dyke would need an MRI but that “I don’t think it looks real good for him.” Backup Braedyn Locke replaced him and completed 13 of 26 passes for 125 yards with one touchdown.

Wisconsin has attempted to overhaul its roster through high school recruiting and the transfer portal, and it’s become increasingly clear that the transition under a new staff and with new schemes is taking longer than people in the program expected. The Badgers are now 9-7 in 16 games under Fickell, including 0-3 against nationally ranked teams, and it’s still not apparent what they do exceptionally well or even what the identity of the team is coming off a 7-6 campaign in Year 1 for Fickell.

“We know we’ve got a hell of a long way to go to figure out what we are and what we can hang our hat on,” Fickell said. “But I have faith and trust in those guys in that locker room. And that’s what you’ve got to continue to ride with.”

Fickell wanted to establish a physical brand of football in two closer-than-expected victories against Western Michigan and South Dakota that still left plenty to be desired. But the team’s physicality was outmatched against Alabama.

Case in point: Wisconsin failed to convert a fourth-and-1 from the Alabama 39-yard line out of a shotgun formation while clinging to a 3-0 lead late in the first quarter. Four plays later, Crimson Tide quarterback Jalen Milroe threw a 31-yard touchdown pass to freshman receiver Ryan Williams that gave Alabama the lead for good.

Wisconsin doesn’t seem to possess the caliber of running backs it did during its high point. There aren’t enough wide receivers who have been able to consistently stretch the field to make Phil Longo’s version of the Air Raid go. And the Badgers haven’t been able to take care of the ball well enough. They fumbled four times and lost two of them against Alabama, including Chez Mellusi’s third-quarter back-breaker that all but gift-wrapped Alabama a 28-3 edge.

“Obviously, Alabama is a really good football team, but I didn’t feel like they were 30 points better than us,” Badgers receiver Will Pauling said. “We shot ourselves in the foot a lot today. And when you’re playing a team like Alabama, a team that has a lot of talent and skill, those small details, they really magnify the game and they really change the game in big ways.”

Members of Wisconsin’s defense, meanwhile, believed they were ready because they had handled adversity in their first two victories. But playing well in the fourth quarter against lesser foes really wasn’t an indicator they could hang with Alabama. Wisconsin’s defense surrendered six touchdowns on 12 Alabama drives. Milroe looked like the Heisman Trophy candidate that he is, accounting for five touchdowns — three passing and two rushing.

Wisconsin safety Hunter Wohler was the most outspoken player last season when the Badgers struggled, at one point saying after a loss to Northwestern the team was “miles different from what I grew up watching.” He struck a different tone after the Alabama loss, saying: “I don’t fear where we are as a program and as a team.” But not everybody felt as optimistic in the immediate aftermath.

“It’s easy for me to say, ‘Oh, no, you can’t judge us off of that,’” Wisconsin cornerback Ricardo Hallman said. “But at the same time, you guys saw that. Alabama is one of the juggernauts in college football. That’s where we want to be as a team, and we got completely obliterated today, and that was terrible. So it’s easy for me to say, ‘Oh, you can’t judge us.’ But I don’t know really what to say to that. This was an early season test we failed.”

Fickell gave his most impassioned answer after the game when he said he knew this season would be a battle and that he didn’t want to jump to conclusions based on one game. Still, his players understood what Saturday represented. Wisconsin had not played a top-10 nonconference opponent at home since facing Miami 35 years earlier.

That day, Wisconsin took a 3-0 lead early before losing 51-3, leading to chants from the Badgers’ fans of “We scored first.” Wisconsin has tried to find a formula that can lead to some of the success the program found over the previous three decades. But that’s not exactly the Wisconsin team this version wants to emulate.

“I expected to win games like this when I first came here,” Hallman said. “I know what Wisconsin is and what we were before I got here. It’s really frustrating and really challenging because as a program, as history-rich as we are and how many great players on the team that we’ve had, we know we’ve got to be better. It’s just a terrible feeling.”

(Photo of LT Overton and Braedyn Locke: John Fisher / Getty Images)

Source link

Related Topics:Alabama Crimson Tide Featured Wisconsin Badgers

Click to comment

Wisconsin

How many homes could be built in Northeast Wisconsin in 2026?

Published

10 hours ago

May 10, 2026

Press Room

How many homes could be built in Northeast Wisconsin in 2026?

(Stacker) – Homebuilding plays a critical role in maintaining a steady housing supply and keeping prices at sustainable levels. As the U.S. population grows, more housing is needed to meet demand. Since the Great Recession, construction has lagged well behind what is needed, which is one of the main reasons home prices are so high today.

Supply has slowly increased over the past few years but is still below what is needed for the market to balance out. Until that gap closes, prices are likely to remain elevated, and many buyers will likely struggle to afford a home.

So, how many homes are getting built in Northeast Wisconsin in 2026? Is construction increasing or decreasing?

Redfin Real Estate analyzed the rate of housing permits issued in the cities of Appleton, Fond du Lac, Green Bay, Oshkosh and Sheboygan over the past 13 months to find out.

Appleton

Appleton housing permits January 2025-January 2026(WBAY)

2026

January – Building permits: 29 (1.2 per 10,000 population)

2025

January – Building permits: 57 (2.3 per 10,000 population)
February – Building permits: 52 (2.1 per 10k)
March – Building permits: 46 (1.9 per 10k)
April – Building permits: 74 (3.0 per 10k)
May – Building permits: 74 (3.0 per 10k)
June – Building permits: 60 (2.5 per 10k)
July – Building permits: 183 (7.5 per 10k)
August – Building permits: 53 (2.2 per 10k)
September – Building permits: 128 (5.3 per 10k)
October – Building permits: 139 (5.7 per 10k)
November – Building permits: 86 (3.5 per 10k)
December – Building permits: 246 (10.1 per 10k)

Fond du Lac

2026

January – Building permits: 10 (1.0 per 10,000 population)

2025

January – Building permits: 12 (1.2 per 10,000 population)
February – Building permits: 12 (1.2 per 10k)
March – Building permits: 11 (1.1 per 10k)
April – Building permits: 20 (1.9 per 10k)
May – Building permits: 21 (2.0 per 10k)
June – Building permits: 15 (1.4 per 10k)
July – Building permits: 17 (1.6 per 10k)
August – Building permits: 16 (1.5 per 10k)
September – Building permits: 21 (2.0 per 10k)
October – Building permits: 19 (1.8 per 10k)
November – Building permits: 11 (1.1 per 10k)
December – Building permits: 20 (1.9 per 10k)

Green Bay

2026

January – Building permits: 304 (9.3 per 10,000 population)

2025

January – Building permits: 84 (2.6 per 10,000 population)
February – Building permits: 67 (2.0 per 10k)
March – Building permits: 97 (3.0 per 10k)
April – Building permits: 166 (5.1 per 10k)
May – Building permits: 141 (4.3 per 10k)
June – Building permits: 93 (2.8 per 10k)
July – Building permits: 185 (5.6 per 10k)
August – Building permits: 120 (3.7 per 10k)
September – Building permits: 88 (2.7 per 10k)
October – Building permits: 155 (4.7 per 10k)
November – Building permits: 156 (4.8 per 10k)
December – Building permits: 62 (1.9 per 10k)

Oshkosh

2026

January – Building permits: 16 (0.9 per 10,000 population)

2025

January – Building permits: 15 (0.9 per 10,000 population)
February – Building permits: 23 (1.3 per 10k)
March – Building permits: 22 (1.3 per 10k)
April – Building permits: 46 (2.7 per 10k)
May – Building permits: 61 (3.6 per 10k)
June – Building permits: 54 (3.1 per 10k)
July – Building permits: 77 (4.5 per 10k)
August – Building permits: 26 (1.5 per 10k)
September – Building permits: 87 (5.1 per 10k)
October – Building permits: 125 (7.3 per 10k)
November – Building permits: 16 (0.9 per 10k)
December – Building permits: 79 (4.6 per 10k)

Sheboygan

2026

January – Building permits: 3 (0.3 per 10,000 population)

2025

January – Building permits: 13 (1.1 per 10,000 population)
February – Building permits: 31 (2.6 per 10k)
March – Building permits: 27 (2.3 per 10k)
April – Building permits: 9 (0.8 per 10k)
May – Building permits: 19 (1.6 per 10k)
June – Building permits: 22 (1.9 per 10k)
July – Building permits: 11 (0.9 per 10k)
August – Building permits: 11 (0.9 per 10k)
September – Building permits: 15 (1.3 per 10k)
October – Building permits: 174 (14.7 per 10k)
November – Building permits: 13 (1.1 per 10k)
December – Building permits: 38 (3.2 per 10k)

Nationally

2026

January – Building permits: 1,386,000 (44.2 per 10,000 population)

2025

January – Building permits: 1,460,000 (46.6 per 10,000 population)
February – Building permits: 1,454,000 (44.2 per 10k)
March – Building permits: 1,481,000 (47.2 per 10k)
April – Building permits: 1,422,000 (45.4 per 10k)
May – Building permits: 1,394,000 (44.5 per 10k)
June – Building permits: 1,393,000 (44.4 per 10k)
July – Building permits: 1,362,000 (43.5 per 10k)
August – Building permits: 1,330,000 (42.4 per 10k)
September – Building permits: 1,425,000 (45.1 per 10k)
October – Building permits: 1,411,000 (45.0 per 10k)
November – Building permits: 1,388,000 (44.3 per 10k)
December – Building permits: 1,455,000 (46.4 per 10k)

National permit data is a seasonally adjusted annual rate; metro-level permit data is the non-seasonally adjusted total number of permits issued per month.

Source link

Wisconsin

Wisconsin Lottery Powerball, Pick 3 results for May 9, 2026

Published

22 hours ago

May 10, 2026

Press Room

Wisconsin Lottery Powerball, Pick 3 results for May 9, 2026

The Wisconsin Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big.

Here’s a look at May 9, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Powerball numbers from May 9 drawing

15-41-46-47-56, Powerball: 22, Power Play: 2

Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 3 numbers from May 9 drawing

Midday: 2-4-4

Evening: 8-4-5

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 4 numbers from May 9 drawing

Midday: 7-3-4-7

Evening: 3-3-5-1

Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning All or Nothing numbers from May 9 drawing

Midday: 03-04-05-06-07-09-12-13-14-16-19

Evening: 03-08-09-12-13-14-15-17-20-21-22

Check All or Nothing payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Badger 5 numbers from May 9 drawing

05-14-18-25-27

Check Badger 5 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning SuperCash numbers from May 9 drawing

02-09-16-28-32-35, Doubler: Y

Check SuperCash payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Megabucks numbers from May 9 drawing

02-20-36-39-40-41

Check Megabucks payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize

Prizes up to $599: Can be claimed at any Wisconsin Lottery retailer.
Prizes from $600 to $199,999: Can be claimed in person at a Lottery Office. By mail, send the signed ticket and a completed claim form available on the Wisconsin Lottery claim page to: Prizes, PO Box 777 Madison, WI 53774.
Prizes of $200,000 or more: Must be claimed in person at the Madison Lottery office. Call the Lottery office prior to your visit: 608-261-4916.

Can Wisconsin lottery winners remain anonymous?

No, according to the Wisconsin Lottery. Due to the state’s open records laws, the lottery must, upon request, release the name and city of the winner. Other information about the winner is released only with the winner’s consent.

When are the Wisconsin Lottery drawings held?

Powerball: 9:59 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
Mega Millions: 10:00 p.m. CT on Tuesday and Friday.
Super Cash: 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
Pick 3 (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
Pick 3 (Evening): 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
Pick 4 (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
Pick 4 (Evening): 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
All or Nothing (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
All or Nothing (Evening): 9 p.m. CT daily.
Megabucks: 9:00 p.m. CT on Wednesday and Saturday.
Badger 5: 9:00 p.m. CT daily.

That lucky feeling: Peek at the past week’s winning numbers.

Feeling lucky? WI man wins $768 million Powerball jackpot **

WI Lottery history: Top 10 Powerball and Mega Million jackpots

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Wisconsin editor. You can send feedback using this form.

Source link

Wisconsin

Wisconsin multi-county police chase, 2 people from Illinois arrested

Published

1 day ago

May 9, 2026

Press Room

Wisconsin multi-county police chase, 2 people from Illinois arrested

article

Fond du Lac County Sheriff’s Office

FOND DU LAC COUNTY, Wis. – Two people from Illinois were arrested following a police chase that started in Fond du Lac County and ended in Winnebago County on Friday, May 8.

Initial traffic stop

What we know:

According to the Fond du Lac County Sheriff’s Office, just after 1 p.m. the sheriff’s office got an alert for a stolen vehicle out of Illinois heading northbound on I-41 from County Road Y.

It was learned that the vehicle was involved in two different police chases in the past week in Illinois, but had eluded officers each time.

FREE DOWNLOAD: Get breaking news alerts in the FOX LOCAL Mobile app for iOS or Android

A short time later, a deputy spotted the vehicle on I-41 near Winnebago Street. The deputy continued to follow the suspect vehicle northbound, waiting for more deputies to get into position to attempt a high-risk traffic stop. Once those deputies were in position, a high-risk traffic stop was conducted. The vehicle initially pulled over and stopped, but right after deputies got out of their squad cars and started telling the people to get out of the vehicle, it instead fled northbound on I-41.

Chase into Winnebago County

What we know:

The chase went into Winnebago County, with the vehicle failing to pullover and instead speeding up. As the chase continued, the vehicle continued driving recklessly, passing by other vehicles on the interstate, including passing on the shoulder and weaving between vehicles, all at a high rate of speed.

The vehicle exited I-41 and ran three red lights. The chase continued southbound on State Highway 26, with the vehicle continuing to pass vehicles at a high rate of speed on the two-lane highway.

The vehicle then went off the road and drove through the yard of a home before circling around in the yard, traveling through the ditch, and reentering the highway going northbound. It then went into a field near County Road Z and Clay Road.

As a sergeant with the sheriff’s office was moving in to perform a Pursuit Intervention Technique (PIT Maneuver), the suspect vehicle went into reverse and rammed the front of the squad. The vehicle then attempted to leave the field by traveling through a ditch and back up onto the road, where another sheriff’s squad ended the chase by intentionally striking the vehicle and pushing it off the road and back into the ditch.

The vehicle rolled over in the ditch, came to rest upright, but was then disabled and could not move. Two people got out of the vehicle and were taken into custody. The vehicle started on fire and a fire department had to respond to extinguish the fire. Both people from the vehicle were evaluated by medical personnel on scene.

SIGN UP TODAY: Get daily headlines, breaking news emails from FOX6 News

Facing charges

What we know:

The driver of the vehicle was identified as a 23-year-old man from Des Plaines, Illinois. He was taken to the Fond du Lac County Jail on the following charges:

Fleeing/Eluding an Officer
1st-Degree Reckless Endangering Safety (2 Counts)
Resisting/Obstructing Officer
Delivering Illegal Articles by Inmate (Ecstasy Pills).

The driver’s criminal history in Illinois was flagged as armed and dangerous with previous weapons offenses, dangerous drug offenses, and criminal damage to property.

The passenger of the vehicle was identified as a 23-year-old woman from Franklin Park, Illinois. She was taken to the Fond du Lac County Jail on the following charges: