Connect with us

Wisconsin

Why Wisconsin coach Luke Fickell fired OC Phil Longo: Who could replace him?

Published

on

Why Wisconsin coach Luke Fickell fired OC Phil Longo: Who could replace him?


MADISON, Wis. — Wisconsin coach Luke Fickell was preparing his team to play Purdue a day after Boilermakers coach Ryan Walters fired his offensive coordinator four games into the season. Although Fickell said at the time that he didn’t want to speculate on what happened at another program, he did offer one nugget about his feelings: “I think it’s a bad part of our game.”

Seven weeks later, Fickell explained his decision to do the same thing amid an ongoing season. On Sunday, Fickell fired offensive coordinator and quarterbacks coach Phil Longo 23 games into his tenure following a 16-13 loss to No. 1 Oregon in which the Badgers averaged a season-low 3.6 yards per play. The move came with two regular season games remaining, beginning Saturday at Nebraska and culminating at home against Minnesota.

“This is never something I ever, ever envisioned doing or wanted to do and especially doing it when there are still games to be played in a season,” Fickell said. “But I felt like for all involved and most importantly for our program and the kids in that locker room, what we needed to do right now was to move forward.

“That’s a very tough thing. It’s an unusual situation that everybody is going to have to be able to handle.”

Advertisement

GO DEEPER

Wisconsin fires offensive coordinator Phil Longo: What’s next for Badgers?

Fickell arrived for his weekly news conference intent on shifting the conversation to Wisconsin’s game against Nebraska, where bowl eligibility for both 5-5 teams is on the line. However, given the magnitude of Fickell’s decision and the uncertainty of the offense’s future, his hope to change gears did not materialize. He seemed to grow more frustrated with the line of questioning as his 18-minute session progressed.

Fickell declined to address specifics about who would call plays for the remainder of the regular season during one of his testiest exchanges when he asked: “Why does it matter?” Fickell then said it would be a collaborative effort and he didn’t want to give people “the ability to point a finger at somebody.” He later said it was part of his philosophy not to make a big deal of the play caller, citing his time as co-defensive coordinator at Ohio State when he called plays but never publicly discussed it despite being repeatedly asked.

A source with knowledge of the situation told The Athletic tight ends coach Nate Letton will call the plays for the remainder of the regular season. Letton worked on Fickell’s staff at Cincinnati in 2022 and joined Wisconsin’s program initially as a quality control coach in January 2023. He took over as the tight ends coach a month later after Gino Guidugli left to become the quarterbacks coach at Notre Dame.

Advertisement

Longo also was responsible for coaching the quarterbacks and signaling plays from the sideline. The source said wide receivers coach Kenny Guiton likely will help signal plays and there is the potential for more huddling between plays to avoid confusion at the line of scrimmage.

Fickell said Guiton would “be a guy that’s kind of running” the quarterback room and that the quarterbacks and wide receivers would work together. Guiton was a quarterback for Ohio State when Fickell coached there. Guiton also was the interim offensive coordinator at Arkansas for the final four games last season. Fickell said he took into consideration that his staff does not have an experienced play caller and noted of his team, “it only matters what those guys in that room believe and will go out and do.”


While the timing of Longo’s firing may come as a surprise, Fickell’s decision to move on certainly wasn’t considering the offense seemed disjointed and was nowhere near good enough in two seasons. In six previous seasons as an FBS offensive coordinator at Ole Miss and North Carolina, Longo’s teams never scored fewer than 32.8 points per game or ranked worse than 33rd nationally in scoring offense. His Wisconsin teams never sniffed those marks as he transitioned away from the Badgers’ long-time pro-style system to his variation of the Air Raid.

Advertisement

Wisconsin ranks 57th in rushing offense (169.3 yards), 91st in total offense (363.1 yards), tied for 97th in scoring offense (23.9 points per game) and 102nd in passing offense (193.8 yards) in the FBS. The Badgers are averaging 5.37 yards per play.

For perspective, consider those marks are worse in every category other than passing offense to Wisconsin’s team two seasons ago, during which time coach Paul Chryst was fired and first-time offensive coordinator Bobby Engram was calling the plays.

Longo was hampered, in part, by the fact that backup quarterback Braedyn Locke started or played meaningful snaps in 12 of Longo’s 23 games because of injuries to the starter. Locke’s career completion rate is 53.1 percent, and Wisconsin is 4-6 in his 10 career starts, with losses in three straight games. He has thrown at least one interception in all seven of his starts this season. Fickell said Locke’s performance didn’t significantly factor into deciding Longo’s fate. He said Locke will continue to be the starter ahead of true freshman backup Mabrey Mettauer.

“It’s a really tough situation,” Fickell said. “We all understand that and we’ve seen that I’m not going to dive as much into it but I’ll just tell you the basic gist of what I told the team. It’s not about play calls. It’s not about points scored. It’s not about touchdowns. It’s moving forward with leadership, and that’s to me what we have to do and why we’re doing it right now.”

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

In Wisconsin’s struggle to win big games, Oregon loss is biggest gut punch yet

Advertisement

As the season progressed there were clear philosophical differences between what Fickell and Longo wanted, with Fickell repeatedly stressing the need to lean on the offensive line and run game more. And while Longo’s offense emphasized the run, he failed to mesh his concepts with Wisconsin’s roster. Perhaps his most notable quote occurred when pressed about the lack of results earlier this season when he said: “I’m here to please coach Fickell.”

Longo did not respond to a cell phone request for comment this week from The Athletic.

Fickell offered his most telling comment Monday off a question that wasn’t specifically related to Longo and instead was about maintaining team morale.

“I think maybe that was one of those issues that was not as good as where we wanted it offensively that it was more about an individual,” Fickell said. “Like, that’s what the program is — it’s complementary ball. It’s so much everybody relying upon each other that any one person shouldn’t matter all that much.

“It’s hard to say, ‘Well they’re the coordinator.’ I hope that it wouldn’t be that much different if somebody else was calling the plays on offense or on defense. That’s my vision for where I want the program to grow.”

Advertisement

Fickell, who is 12-11 overall and 8-8 in the Big Ten since the start of last season, has shown he’s willing to change course when something doesn’t work. He fired offensive line coach Jack Bicknell Jr, who was hired along with Longo from North Carolina, at the end of last season. Fickell replaced him with A.J. Blazek, who has been a strong addition to the staff for his enthusiasm and coaching acumen.

Fickell said he didn’t make the move now with anything other than a view toward what was best for his current team. However, at least part of Wisconsin’s roster could hang in the balance depending on how Fickell moves forward. Wisconsin has 22 scholarship commits in the 2025 recruiting class with the early signing period beginning Dec. 4. The transfer portal window runs from Dec. 9-28. Fickell declined to provide a timeline for when he hopes to hire his next offensive coordinator, saying he was focused on preparing for Nebraska and “the rest of the timelines will probably just be in the back of my head.”


Who could replace Longo?

Several names have surfaced as potential candidates to replace Longo, including Guidugli. He was with Fickell at Cincinnati from 2017-22 as quarterbacks coach and passing game coordinator and spent his last season there as offensive coordinator. Guidugli briefly followed Fickell to Wisconsin before accepting the Notre Dame job.

Notre Dame offensive coordinator Mike Denbrock was Fickell’s offensive coordinator at Cincinnati from 2017-21. His annual salary is $2.1 million, which makes him the highest-paid offensive coordinator in the country. Longo had one more year remaining on a three-year deal that paid him $1.25 million annually.

Another name that could be in consideration is Idaho coach Jason Eck, a former Badgers offensive lineman who played with Wisconsin assistant offensive line coach Casey Rabach for three seasons. Eck is 24-12 in three seasons at Idaho and has led the Vandals to the FCS playoffs in his first two seasons. Eck would represent more of a return to Wisconsin’s roots and give Fickell a staffer with previous ties to the program that has been missing outside of Rabach.

Advertisement

Other popular names include Ohio State co-offensive coordinator and wide receivers coach Brian Hartline, Washington State offensive coordinator Ben Arbuckle and Indiana offensive coordinator Mike Shanahan, among others.

“I do like what we do,” Fickell said. “It’s not like we want to go back and think we’re going to be in 22 personnel. We’ve got to have variety. We’ve got to be able to spread the field. But we’ve got to continue to build upon the things that we’ve done. … Regardless of who’s actually calling the plays, the progression is how you continue to evolve the offense in particular for what best fits Wisconsin. And what best fits Wisconsin is using the things that you do have.”

Fickell said that because he spent 20 years at just two schools (Ohio State and Cincinnati), he doesn’t necessarily have as many relationships with coaches as others have. He said he wouldn’t hesitate to hire someone he hasn’t directly worked with before, as was the case with Longo. But he also valued working with many of the same people for so long.

“I can tell you this,” Fickell said. “It’ll be the right one, the right person.”

Fickell can’t afford for it not to be.

Advertisement

(Photo: Jeff Hanisch / Imagn Images)





Source link

Wisconsin

How many homes could be built in Northeast Wisconsin in 2026?

Published

on

How many homes could be built in Northeast Wisconsin in 2026?


(Stacker) – Homebuilding plays a critical role in maintaining a steady housing supply and keeping prices at sustainable levels. As the U.S. population grows, more housing is needed to meet demand. Since the Great Recession, construction has lagged well behind what is needed, which is one of the main reasons home prices are so high today.

Supply has slowly increased over the past few years but is still below what is needed for the market to balance out. Until that gap closes, prices are likely to remain elevated, and many buyers will likely struggle to afford a home.

So, how many homes are getting built in Northeast Wisconsin in 2026? Is construction increasing or decreasing?

Redfin Real Estate analyzed the rate of housing permits issued in the cities of Appleton, Fond du Lac, Green Bay, Oshkosh and Sheboygan over the past 13 months to find out.

Advertisement

Appleton

Appleton housing permits January 2025-January 2026(WBAY)

2026

  • January – Building permits: 29 (1.2 per 10,000 population)

2025

  • January – Building permits: 57 (2.3 per 10,000 population)
  • February – Building permits: 52 (2.1 per 10k)
  • March – Building permits: 46 (1.9 per 10k)
  • April – Building permits: 74 (3.0 per 10k)
  • May – Building permits: 74 (3.0 per 10k)
  • June – Building permits: 60 (2.5 per 10k)
  • July – Building permits: 183 (7.5 per 10k)
  • August – Building permits: 53 (2.2 per 10k)
  • September – Building permits: 128 (5.3 per 10k)
  • October – Building permits: 139 (5.7 per 10k)
  • November – Building permits: 86 (3.5 per 10k)
  • December – Building permits: 246 (10.1 per 10k)

Fond du Lac

Fond du Lac housing permits January 2025-January 2026
Fond du Lac housing permits January 2025-January 2026(WBAY)

2026

  • January – Building permits: 10 (1.0 per 10,000 population)

2025

  • January – Building permits: 12 (1.2 per 10,000 population)
  • February – Building permits: 12 (1.2 per 10k)
  • March – Building permits: 11 (1.1 per 10k)
  • April – Building permits: 20 (1.9 per 10k)
  • May – Building permits: 21 (2.0 per 10k)
  • June – Building permits: 15 (1.4 per 10k)
  • July – Building permits: 17 (1.6 per 10k)
  • August – Building permits: 16 (1.5 per 10k)
  • September – Building permits: 21 (2.0 per 10k)
  • October – Building permits: 19 (1.8 per 10k)
  • November – Building permits: 11 (1.1 per 10k)
  • December – Building permits: 20 (1.9 per 10k)

Green Bay

Green Bay housing permits January 2025-January 2026
Green Bay housing permits January 2025-January 2026(WBAY)

2026

  • January – Building permits: 304 (9.3 per 10,000 population)

2025

  • January – Building permits: 84 (2.6 per 10,000 population)
  • February – Building permits: 67 (2.0 per 10k)
  • March – Building permits: 97 (3.0 per 10k)
  • April – Building permits: 166 (5.1 per 10k)
  • May – Building permits: 141 (4.3 per 10k)
  • June – Building permits: 93 (2.8 per 10k)
  • July – Building permits: 185 (5.6 per 10k)
  • August – Building permits: 120 (3.7 per 10k)
  • September – Building permits: 88 (2.7 per 10k)
  • October – Building permits: 155 (4.7 per 10k)
  • November – Building permits: 156 (4.8 per 10k)
  • December – Building permits: 62 (1.9 per 10k)

Oshkosh

Oshkosh housing permits January 2025-January 2026
Oshkosh housing permits January 2025-January 2026(WBAY)

2026

  • January – Building permits: 16 (0.9 per 10,000 population)

2025

  • January – Building permits: 15 (0.9 per 10,000 population)
  • February – Building permits: 23 (1.3 per 10k)
  • March – Building permits: 22 (1.3 per 10k)
  • April – Building permits: 46 (2.7 per 10k)
  • May – Building permits: 61 (3.6 per 10k)
  • June – Building permits: 54 (3.1 per 10k)
  • July – Building permits: 77 (4.5 per 10k)
  • August – Building permits: 26 (1.5 per 10k)
  • September – Building permits: 87 (5.1 per 10k)
  • October – Building permits: 125 (7.3 per 10k)
  • November – Building permits: 16 (0.9 per 10k)
  • December – Building permits: 79 (4.6 per 10k)

Sheboygan

Sheboygan housing permits January 2025-January 2026
Sheboygan housing permits January 2025-January 2026(WBAY)

2026

  • January – Building permits: 3 (0.3 per 10,000 population)

2025

  • January – Building permits: 13 (1.1 per 10,000 population)
  • February – Building permits: 31 (2.6 per 10k)
  • March – Building permits: 27 (2.3 per 10k)
  • April – Building permits: 9 (0.8 per 10k)
  • May – Building permits: 19 (1.6 per 10k)
  • June – Building permits: 22 (1.9 per 10k)
  • July – Building permits: 11 (0.9 per 10k)
  • August – Building permits: 11 (0.9 per 10k)
  • September – Building permits: 15 (1.3 per 10k)
  • October – Building permits: 174 (14.7 per 10k)
  • November – Building permits: 13 (1.1 per 10k)
  • December – Building permits: 38 (3.2 per 10k)

Nationally

National housing permits January 2025-January 2026
National housing permits January 2025-January 2026(WBAY)

2026

  • January – Building permits: 1,386,000 (44.2 per 10,000 population)

2025

  • January – Building permits: 1,460,000 (46.6 per 10,000 population)
  • February – Building permits: 1,454,000 (44.2 per 10k)
  • March – Building permits: 1,481,000 (47.2 per 10k)
  • April – Building permits: 1,422,000 (45.4 per 10k)
  • May – Building permits: 1,394,000 (44.5 per 10k)
  • June – Building permits: 1,393,000 (44.4 per 10k)
  • July – Building permits: 1,362,000 (43.5 per 10k)
  • August – Building permits: 1,330,000 (42.4 per 10k)
  • September – Building permits: 1,425,000 (45.1 per 10k)
  • October – Building permits: 1,411,000 (45.0 per 10k)
  • November – Building permits: 1,388,000 (44.3 per 10k)
  • December – Building permits: 1,455,000 (46.4 per 10k)

National permit data is a seasonally adjusted annual rate; metro-level permit data is the non-seasonally adjusted total number of permits issued per month.

Copyright 2026 Stacker via Gray Media Group, Inc. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin Lottery Powerball, Pick 3 results for May 9, 2026

Published

on

Wisconsin Lottery Powerball, Pick 3 results for May 9, 2026


play

The Wisconsin Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big.

Advertisement

Here’s a look at May 9, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Powerball numbers from May 9 drawing

15-41-46-47-56, Powerball: 22, Power Play: 2

Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 3 numbers from May 9 drawing

Midday: 2-4-4

Evening: 8-4-5

Advertisement

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 4 numbers from May 9 drawing

Midday: 7-3-4-7

Evening: 3-3-5-1

Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning All or Nothing numbers from May 9 drawing

Midday: 03-04-05-06-07-09-12-13-14-16-19

Advertisement

Evening: 03-08-09-12-13-14-15-17-20-21-22

Check All or Nothing payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Badger 5 numbers from May 9 drawing

05-14-18-25-27

Check Badger 5 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning SuperCash numbers from May 9 drawing

02-09-16-28-32-35, Doubler: Y

Advertisement

Check SuperCash payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Megabucks numbers from May 9 drawing

02-20-36-39-40-41

Check Megabucks payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize

  • Prizes up to $599: Can be claimed at any Wisconsin Lottery retailer.
  • Prizes from $600 to $199,999: Can be claimed in person at a Lottery Office. By mail, send the signed ticket and a completed claim form available on the Wisconsin Lottery claim page to: Prizes, PO Box 777 Madison, WI 53774.
  • Prizes of $200,000 or more: Must be claimed in person at the Madison Lottery office. Call the Lottery office prior to your visit: 608-261-4916.

Can Wisconsin lottery winners remain anonymous?

No, according to the Wisconsin Lottery. Due to the state’s open records laws, the lottery must, upon request, release the name and city of the winner. Other information about the winner is released only with the winner’s consent.

When are the Wisconsin Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 9:59 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 10:00 p.m. CT on Tuesday and Friday.
  • Super Cash: 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
  • Pick 3 (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
  • Pick 3 (Evening): 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
  • Pick 4 (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
  • Pick 4 (Evening): 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
  • All or Nothing (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
  • All or Nothing (Evening): 9 p.m. CT daily.
  • Megabucks: 9:00 p.m. CT on Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Badger 5: 9:00 p.m. CT daily.

That lucky feeling: Peek at the past week’s winning numbers.

Feeling lucky? WI man wins $768 million Powerball jackpot **

Advertisement

WI Lottery history: Top 10 Powerball and Mega Million jackpots

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Wisconsin editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin multi-county police chase, 2 people from Illinois arrested

Published

on

Wisconsin multi-county police chase, 2 people from Illinois arrested


Fond du Lac County Sheriff’s Office

Two people from Illinois were arrested following a police chase that started in Fond du Lac County and ended in Winnebago County on Friday, May 8.

Initial traffic stop

Advertisement

What we know:

According to the Fond du Lac County Sheriff’s Office, just after 1 p.m. the sheriff’s office got an alert for a stolen vehicle out of Illinois heading northbound on I-41 from County Road Y.

It was learned that the vehicle was involved in two different police chases in the past week in Illinois, but had eluded officers each time.

Advertisement

FREE DOWNLOAD: Get breaking news alerts in the FOX LOCAL Mobile app for iOS or Android

A short time later, a deputy spotted the vehicle on I-41 near Winnebago Street. The deputy continued to follow the suspect vehicle northbound, waiting for more deputies to get into position to attempt a high-risk traffic stop. Once those deputies were in position, a high-risk traffic stop was conducted. The vehicle initially pulled over and stopped, but right after deputies got out of their squad cars and started telling the people to get out of the vehicle, it instead fled northbound on I-41.

Advertisement

Chase into Winnebago County

What we know:

The chase went into Winnebago County, with the vehicle failing to pullover and instead speeding up. As the chase continued, the vehicle continued driving recklessly, passing by other vehicles on the interstate, including passing on the shoulder and weaving between vehicles, all at a high rate of speed.

Advertisement

The vehicle exited I-41 and ran three red lights. The chase continued southbound on State Highway 26, with the vehicle continuing to pass vehicles at a high rate of speed on the two-lane highway.

The vehicle then went off the road and drove through the yard of a home before circling around in the yard, traveling through the ditch, and reentering the highway going northbound. It then went into a field near County Road Z and Clay Road.

As a sergeant with the sheriff’s office was moving in to perform a Pursuit Intervention Technique (PIT Maneuver), the suspect vehicle went into reverse and rammed the front of the squad. The vehicle then attempted to leave the field by traveling through a ditch and back up onto the road, where another sheriff’s squad ended the chase by intentionally striking the vehicle and pushing it off the road and back into the ditch.

Advertisement

The vehicle rolled over in the ditch, came to rest upright, but was then disabled and could not move. Two people got out of the vehicle and were taken into custody. The vehicle started on fire and a fire department had to respond to extinguish the fire. Both people from the vehicle were evaluated by medical personnel on scene.

SIGN UP TODAY: Get daily headlines, breaking news emails from FOX6 News

Advertisement

Facing charges

What we know:

The driver of the vehicle was identified as a 23-year-old man from Des Plaines, Illinois. He was taken to the Fond du Lac County Jail on the following charges:

Advertisement
  • Fleeing/Eluding an Officer
  • 1st-Degree Reckless Endangering Safety (2 Counts)
  • Resisting/Obstructing Officer
  • Delivering Illegal Articles by Inmate (Ecstasy Pills).

The driver’s criminal history in Illinois was flagged as armed and dangerous with previous weapons offenses, dangerous drug offenses, and criminal damage to property.

The passenger of the vehicle was identified as a 23-year-old woman from Franklin Park, Illinois. She was taken to the Fond du Lac County Jail on the following charges:

  • Fleeing/Eluding—Party to a Crime
  • 1st Degree Reckless Endangering Safety—Party to a Crime
  • Possession of THC
  • Possession of Drug Paraphernalia
  • Resisting and Obstructing an Officer

The Source: The Fond du Lac County Sheriff’s Office sent FOX6 a press release.

Advertisement

Police ChasesFond du Lac CountyNews



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending