Connect with us

Wisconsin

Republican lawmakers ask Wisconsin Supreme Court to reconsider redistricting ruling – Wisconsin Examiner

Published

on

Republican lawmakers ask Wisconsin Supreme Court to reconsider redistricting ruling – Wisconsin Examiner


Wisconsin Republicans have asked the state Supreme Court to reconsider its decision to overturn the state’s legislative maps, saying lawmakers can’t draw new maps by the Court’s Jan. 12 deadline. 

In a motion filed last week, the attorneys for Senate Republicans argued the lawmakers wouldn’t be able to hit the Jan. 12 deadline to produce new maps that follow the Court’s order that districts be contiguous. 

“And now, announced the Friday before Christmas, the parties have been given 21 days — a third of them falling on weekends and state holidays — to submit proposed remedies, lengthy remedial briefs, and expert reports,” the Republican attorneys state in a filing. “The message is clear: The regular rules apply to Republicans. But here, Democrats get special solicitude.”

The Republicans also argue that the Court didn’t listen to their arguments, pre-decided the case and didn’t give them a chance to respond to the deadline for new maps. 

Advertisement

On Dec. 22, the Court ruled in a 4-3 decision that Wisconsin’s current maps are unconstitutional because they include many districts that aren’t contiguous — a requirement under the state constitution. The Court ordered the Legislature and the other parties involved in the lawsuit to submit new maps by Jan. 12, with supporting arguments due 10 days later. 

In order to be in place in time for the 2024 legislative elections, the maps must be set by mid-March, state election officials have said. 

The maps submitted by the parties will also be assessed by two referees the Court has appointed: University of California, Irvine political science professor Bernard Grofman and Carnegie Mellon University postdoctoral fellow Jonathan Cervas. 

For more than a decade, despite Wisconsin’s near 50-50 political divide, Republicans have enjoyed a disproportionately large majority in both houses of the Legislature because of the severe partisan gerrymander they instituted in 2011. That gerrymander, which experts have often cited as one of the worst in the country, was continued in 2022 when the Supreme Court, then under a conservative majority, imposed maps drawn by the Legislature. 

In addition to their request that the state Supreme Court reconsider its decision, Republicans have also suggested plans to appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court. 

Advertisement

That course of action, however, would require Republicans to find a violation of federal law in a case and decision that are almost entirely focused on issues of state law. 

“We will pursue all federal issues arising out of the redistricting litigation at the U.S. Supreme Court,” Assembly Speaker Robin Vos (R-Rochester) said in a statement after the state Court’s decision. 

Before the decision, Republicans suggested that they would challenge Justice Janet Protasiewicz’s participation in the case at the U.S. Supreme Court. 

For months, Republicans alleged Protasiewicz had “pre-judged” the case because of comments about the legislative maps she made on the campaign trail and donations her campaign received from the state Democratic Party. Republicans threatened that if she didn’t recuse from the case, they’d move to impeach her. 

Protasiewicz denied the request for recusal, saying that the Democratic Party wasn’t a litigant in the case so its political donations to her didn’t affect the case and that recusing because of donations from one party would set a difficult precedent for the other members of the Court who have received campaign cash from either of the parties. 

Advertisement

The impeachment threat has subsided, but Republicans could argue in federal court that her participation violated their due process rights. 

Such an argument would be made under a federal precedent set in a 2009 Supreme Court case, Caperton v. Massey. In Caperton, a West Virginia judge had refused to recuse himself from the appeal of a $50 million jury verdict after the CEO of the plaintiff in the case had donated $3 million to the judge’s campaign. 

In addition to the facts in the case being different, the Caperton precedent was set by a liberal majority, so the current conservative leaning U.S. Supreme Court — which has regularly ruled in favor of money in politics — might be hesitant to endorse its argument. 

Other federal claims could be made after the maps are chosen. In the legal battle that led to the imposition of the current maps, the U.S. Supreme Court stepped in to say the Wisconsin Supreme Court couldn’t select legislative maps drawn by Gov. Tony Evers because they violated the Voting Rights Act by attempting to create too many majority-minority districts around Milwaukee. 

Vos said he expects a similar outcome this time. 

Advertisement

“Last time around, the Democrats’ maps racially gerrymandered voters to obtain a political goal,” he said. “I expect they’ll do so again. The Supreme Court wasn’t fooled by the overt racial gerrymandering before, and it’s my hope that the Court will refuse to allow that or any other violation of federal law this time around, too.”

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

Wisconsin

Wisconsin vs. Michigan Game Thread: Can’t let this one slip early

Published

on

Wisconsin vs. Michigan Game Thread: Can’t let this one slip early


The Wisconsin Badgers are taking on the No. 2 Michigan Wolverines on the road on Saturday, with tip-off set for 12:00 p.m. at the Crisler Center on CBS.

Wisconsin has seen some ups and downs this season, failing to secure a Quad 1 win through 15 games, as they’ve gone 0-5 in those opportunities. The team did pick up a nice win at home over the UCLA Bruins earlier this week, using a huge start to stay on top 80-72.

That got Wisconsin to 10-5 and added their third Quad 2 win of the season, but no matchup so far will compare to what the Badgers will face against the Michigan Wolverines, who have started 14-0 this season. Michigan has dominated its competition so far. They’ve beaten three ranked teams so far, and the lowest margin of victory in those games was 30 points.

But the Wolverines did face some trouble earlier this week, narrowly beating the 9-6 Penn State Nittany Lions 74-72 on the road.

Advertisement

Heading into Saturday, the Badgers are seen as 19.5-point underdogs, easily their biggest spread of the season as an underdog. Can they find a way to keep this one competitive?

Join us as our game thread is officially open for Saturday’s game!



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Eli McKown’s rapid reactions from Iowa wrestling victory vs. Wisconsin

Published

on

Eli McKown’s rapid reactions from Iowa wrestling victory vs. Wisconsin


play

IOWA CITY — Iowa wrestling rallied to defeat Wisconsin 23-12 in a Big Ten Conference dual at Carver-Hawkeye Arena.

The Hawkeyes finished with four consecutive wins from 157 to 184, including a pair of pivotal technical falls from Michael Caliendo and Angelo Ferrari.

Advertisement

In the video above, Hawk Central wrestling reporter Eli McKown offers up some instant analysis from Iowa’s victory. Up next, Jan. 16 at home against Penn State.



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin teen who killed prison guard in fistfight pleads guilty but claims mental illness

Published

on

Wisconsin teen who killed prison guard in fistfight pleads guilty but claims mental illness


MADISON, Wis. — A Wisconsin teen who killed a prison guard during a fistfight pleaded guilty to homicide Friday but contends he doesn’t deserve prison time because he was mentally ill and not responsible for his actions.

Javarius Hurd, 17, entered a plea of guilty/not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect to one count of second-degree reckless homicide in connection with Corey Proulx’s death, online court records show. He also pleaded guilty to one count of battery by a prisoner. Prosecutors dropped a second battery count in exchange for the pleas.

The next step for Hurd will be a February trial in which jurors will determine whether he should be sentenced to prison or committed to a mental institution. Jurors will be asked to determine whether Hurd was indeed suffering from a mental disease at the time of the fight and, if so, whether the mental disease impaired his ability to act within the law.

“Javarius entered into a plea agreement that partially resolves the case involving the sad and tragic death of (Proulx),” Hurd’s attorney, Aaton Nelson, said in an email to The Associated Press. “Javarius, who has had a life filled with trauma and suffering, realizes that nothing will compensate the victims for their loss and suffering. We hope that this agreement will help all those suffering with their healing.”

Advertisement

According to court documents, Hurd was incarcerated at the Lincoln Hills-Copper Lakes School, the state’s youth prison in far northern Wisconsin, in June 2024.

He grew upset with a female counselor whom he felt was abusing her powers, threw soap at her and punched her. Hurd ran into the courtyard and Proulx followed to stop him. Hurd punched Proulx several times and Proulx fell, hit his head on the pavement and later died. Hurd was 16 at the time but was charged in adult court.

Another inmate at the youth prison, Rian Nyblom, pleaded guilty to two counts of being a party to battery in connection with the incident and was sentenced to five years in prison this past August.

According to prosecutors, Nyblom knew that Hurd was upset with the female counselor and wanted to splash her with conditioner and punch her. About 15 minutes before the fighting began, he got extra soap and conditioner from guards and secretly gave it to Hurd. Nyblom told investigators that he didn’t see Hurd attack the female counselor but watched as Hurd punched Proulx.

Lincoln Hills-Cooper Lake is Wisconsin’s only youth prison. The facility has been plagued by allegations of staff-on-inmate abuse, including excessive use of pepper spray, restraints and strip searches.

Advertisement

The American Civil Liberties Union filed a federal lawsuit in 2017 demanding changes at the prison. Then-Gov. Scott Walker’s administration settled the following year by agreeing to a consent decree that prohibited the use of mechanical restraints like handcuffs and the use of pepper spray.

Proulx’s death sparked calls from Republican lawmakers and from Lincoln Hills-Copper Lakes staff for more leeway in punishing incarcerated children, but Democratic Gov. Tony Evers rejected those calls, insisting conditions at the prison have been slowly improving. A court-appointed monitor assigned to oversee the prison’s progress reported this past October that the facility was fully compliant with the consent decree’s provisions for the first time.

Legislators have been trying to find a way to close the facility for years and replace with it with smaller regional prisons. Those prisons remain under construction, however, and Lincoln Hills-Copper Lake continues to operate.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending