Connect with us

Austin, TX

What’s Going on With the Gerrymandering Chaos in Texas?

Published

on

What’s Going on With the Gerrymandering Chaos in Texas?


Donald Trump and Republicans are nervous about the 2026 midterms. The president’s polling numbers are very bad (despite what he claims), and it doesn’t seem like Americans are thrilled with his lackeys in Congress who have supported the administration’s assault on Medicaid and other social services, his hardline immigration crackdown, or his chaotic approach to the economy. Democrats only need to flip a few seats to win back control of the House of Representatives, which would allow them to block Trump’s legislative agenda and launch investigations into his administration’s rank corruption.

Trump and Republicans have responded by trying to game the system, including by attempting to worm their way into state election infrastructure, and, most notably, by pushing Texas Republicans to redraw the state’s legislative map and take seats away from Democrats. The situation exploded this week, with Democrats fleeing the state to block the GOP from enacting the change. Here’s everything you need to know:

States redistrict their electoral maps every 10 years, after the national census, so that congressional districts can reflect the state’s population. These redistricting efforts are supposed to comply with anti-discrimination laws outlined in the Voting Rights Act of 1968, and the Constitution mandates districts to have approximately equal populations. 

Gerrymandering is the practice of drawing these maps in order to favor a certain political party.

Advertisement

When a district is gerrymandered, its boundaries are intentionally drawn to include or exclude specific subsets of voters — sometimes down to a street level — in order to tip the scales toward one party. Since voters don’t typically get a say in how their electoral map is drawn, gerrymandering is essentially the practice of a party choosing its own electorate in order to guarantee favorable outcomes for themselves. 

What are Republicans trying to do in Texas?

States are not supposed to redistrict for another five years, but Trump is pushing Texas to do it now. The state’s Republican-controlled legislature has responded by proposing a new map that would likely give them five new seats by drawing conservative voters into districts currently held by Democrats, without endangering any Republican districts.

The new map was concocted during a special session Governor Greg Abbott called last month under the guise of bolstering the state’s response to devastating flash floods in early July. The most notable item on the agenda, however, was a speed revision of the state’s already heavily gerrymandered district map.

“This is a five-alarm fire, what’s happening in Texas,” Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, told Rolling Stone last month. “Donald Trump has already said that if he does this to Texas, he wants to do this all across the country.”

Advertisement

The state legislature still needs to vote on the map before it’s official. The special session Abbott called last month is slated to end on August 19.

How have Texas Democrats responded?

They outright left the state. Texas law requires at least two thirds of the 150-representative state legislature to be present in order to establish the quorum necessary to conduct business. On Sunday afternoon, over 50 Democratic members of the state legislature fled to Chicago in a last-ditch effort to block their GOP colleagues from approving the redrawn map. 

It’s not the first time such a strategy has been used by the state’s Democratic minority. In 2021, Texas Democrats holed up in Washington, D.C., for six weeks to try to block the passage of Texas’ current district map — which remains tied up in legal battles over accusations of gerrymandering. Following the 2021 quorum break, Texas Republicans passed legislation imposing heavy fines and penalties on lawmakers who leave the state to break quorum. 

Abbott and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) have threatened to arrest and prosecute the truant lawmakers, as well as anyone who assists them in avoiding a return to Texas. The legislature voted on Monday to issue civil arrest warrants for the Democrats who bolted (these are not enforceable in Illinois, where the Democrats are staying), and Abbott instructed the Texas Rangers to “investigate fleeing Texas House Democrats for potential bribery and any other potential legal violations connected to their refusal to appear for a quorum.”

Advertisement

Abbott said on Tuesday that state officers are “on the streets” looking for Democratic lawmakers who did not show up for a quorum but are still in the state. He also claimed that he could move to remove these Democrats from office and hold elections to replace them.

How have Democrats responded around the nation?

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) traveled to Texas to meet with state legislators before they fled the state, Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker is hosting the Democrats that fled, and governors of other prominent liberal states seem to recognize that the party needs to start fighting fire with fire.

Governor Gavin Newsom is rallying Democrats in California behind a plan to redraw the state’s congressional map and have voters approve it before the midterms. “Legally, we can do it. Politically, we must do it,” said Democratic gubernatorial candidate Xavier Becerra. Katie Porter, another gubernatorial candidate, also supports the plan. “Texas Republicans are leaving us no choice,” she told CNN. “They are tinkering with the rules of our democracy.”

New York Governor Kathy Hochul, too, has signaled that she supports redistricting in the state should Texas redraw its map, and lawmakers introduced a resolution to amend the state’s constitution and allow them to redraw the map in the middle of the decade. New York used an independent commission to redistrict for the first time after the 2020 census. It was a disaster. The commission failed to agree on a plan, leading to years of back-and-forth between the commission, the legislature, and the courts.

“I’m tired of fighting this fight with my hand tied behind my back,” Hochul said this week amid talks of amending the state’s constitution, a move that could lead to a new congressional map by 2027. “With all due respect to the good government groups, politics is a political process.”

Advertisement

Vice President J.D. Vance, meanwhile, is reportedly headed to Indiana this week to meet with Governor Mike Braun about gerrymandering the state’s map as part of the tit-for-tat with Democrats.

What are Trump and Republicans saying?

Trump has been pushing Texas Republicans to redraw the map in order to bolster his chances of retaining control of Congress after the midterms. “There could be some other states, we’re going to get another three, or four, or five in addition. Texas would be the biggest one.” Trump said in July. “Just a simple redrawing, we pick up five seats.”

The president weighed in again on Tuesday, after Democrats fled the state, telling CNBC that he is “entitled” to five additional seats in Texas, citing his performance in the election.

Trending Stories

“We have an opportunity in Texas to pick up five seats,” he said. “We have a good governor and we have good people in Texas. I got the highest vote in the history of Texas, as you probably know, and we are entitled to five more seats.”

Advertisement

“I don’t know,” host Joe Kernan replied. “I have to check on that.”
Aaron Blake of The Washington Post quickly pointed out on X that the 56 percent Trump won in Texas in 2024 is not even close to the highest margin ever, ranking 15th, historically.



Source link

Austin, TX

New Texas law tightens rules for autonomous vehicle companies, including Waymo

Published

on

New Texas law tightens rules for autonomous vehicle companies, including Waymo


Self-driving cars have become a common sight on Austin streets, but a new Texas law is adding tougher requirements for the companies behind the wheelless vehicles.

Senate Bill 2807 imposes stricter rules on autonomous vehicle companies operating in the state, including state authorization, emergency response plans for law enforcement, and a public portal where residents can verify operators and file safety complaints.

The changes come as Austin continues to track incidents involving autonomous vehicles. The city’s autonomous vehicle dashboard shows 75 incidents in 2026, including a collision, eight near misses, and seven incidents of ignoring police direction.

Attorney Drew Gibbs, a partner at Slingshot Law, said one crash involved a Waymo vehicle.

Advertisement

“There was a T-bone collision. A pretty serious T-bone collision where a Waymo just crashed into the side of my client’s vehicle,” Gibbs said.

ALSO| Waymo files voluntary software recall over flooded-lane risks on high-speed roads

KEYE

Advertisement

One of the incidents of ignoring police direction happened during the mass shooting on West Sixth Street back in March, when three people died, and 15 others were injured.

Austin Police Association President Michael Bullock said autonomous vehicles can struggle in unusual situations.

“It didn’t impede on anything in the moment, but it’s not necessarily uncommon where these vehicles don’t quite know how to deal with these one-off scenarios,” Bullock said.

The new law requires autonomous vehicle companies to be authorized by the state, to provide an emergency response plan for law enforcement, and to participate in a public-facing portal that allows the public to verify operators and submit safety complaints.

Kara Kockelman, a professor of transportation and engineering at the University of Texas at Austin, welcomed the added oversight.

Advertisement

“I’m glad that the state is taking this a bit more seriously now,” she said. “It’s important not to just let others slip in without kind of meeting those basic minimums.”

Bullock said the emergency planning requirement may not make a major difference in fast-moving situations. Asked how impactful it is to have a fully laid out emergency response plan, Bullock said, “These plans are great, but it takes time to work through all of those versus the immediacy of having someone behind the wheel.”

The four autonomous vehicle companies operating in Austin — Waymo, Zoox, AV-Ride, and Tesla — are all state-authorized.

The Texas DMV said an autonomous vehicle company can lose its authorization to operate in Texas if the agency deems the vehicles are operating in a way that endangers public safety.

Waymo was contacted for comment, but had not responded.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Jane Nelson, Texas’ top election official, stepping down as Secretary of State

Published

on

Jane Nelson, Texas’ top election official, stepping down as Secretary of State


Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson said Tuesday she will leave the post next month.

What we know:

Advertisement

In a statement, Nelson said her resignation will be effective July 17 but did not provide a reason for the departure.

“It has been an honor to serve the people of Texas in this role,” Nelson said. “My time as Secretary came at an important moment for Texas, and I am proud of what we have been able to accomplish as an agency in under four years.”

Nelson has served in the role since 2023.

Advertisement

Among other things, the Secretary of State oversees elections and business filings in the state and serves as the chief diplomat of Texas.

View of Texas State Senator Jane Nelson, during the 80th Texas Legislature, on the floor of the Senate at the Texas State Capitol, Austin, Texas, January 22, 2007. (John Anderson/The Austin Chronicle / Getty Images)

Advertisement

What they’re saying:

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott described Nelson as extraordinary.

“I am deeply grateful for her long and loyal service and outstanding leadership. She has represented our state with grace and honor across the globe, and Texas is better because of it,” Abbott said. “Cecilia and I wish her all the best in the next chapter of her distinguished career.”

Advertisement

Dig deeper:

According to the Secretary of State’s office, Nelson has presided over seven statewide elections during her tenure with a cumulative 27 million ballots cast and broke a record with more than 3 million active business filers.

Advertisement

Nelson also served three decades in the Texas Senate, where she remains the longest-serving Republican in state history.

The Source: Information in this story came from the Texas Secretary of State’s office.

TexasElectionPoliticsTexas Politics2026 ElectionsAustinGreg Abbott
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Austin OKs $2.35 billion of revenue bonds, eyes GO bond election

Published

on

Austin OKs .35 billion of revenue bonds, eyes GO bond election


Austin Mayor Kirk Watson wants the city council to hold off on a bond measure this year to set up a better proposal in 2028.

Michael Dorman

Austin, Texas, is revving up to sell $2.35 billion of debt for a convention center and a wastewater treatment plant, while a legal battle continues over bonds to help finance a light rail system. 

Processing Content

Advertisement

The bond boom comes as the city council voted on Thursday to pursue the development of a $390 million baseline general obligation bond package for the November ballot despite a call by Mayor Kirk Watson to wait until 2028.

“I believe we can and we should bring forward significant investments in the future,” he said. “In fact, if we restore compliance with our financial policies and we maintain the discipline we actually will have greater future capacity to do more for this community in 2028.”

A bond election would follow the rejection of a maintenance and operations property tax hike by 63% of city voters in November. In the wake of the defeat, Austin officials took steps to better manage its finances, including pursuing a citywide performance and efficiency audit of city operations.

The city, which last held a successful GO bond election in 2022 for $350 million of debt for affordable housing, had $1.03 billion of unissued voter-approved GO bond authorization as of the Sept. 30 end of fiscal 2025. Last year, Austin sold $796 million of GO bonds and certificates of obligation in a deal rated triple-A with stable outlooks by S&P Global Ratings and Fitch Ratings.

On Thursday, the city council signed off on a $34.5 million wrongful prosecution and conviction settlement with four individuals to be financed through the sale of non-voter-approved GO bonds. 

Advertisement

The council approved up to $1.35 billion of special tax revenue bonds on May 21 for a $1.6 billion project to replace the city’s now-demolished convention center with a facility that will increase rentable event space to 620,000 square feet from 365,000 square feet.

Construction site for Austin convention center project
Construction site for Austin’s convention center project, shown in March. The city council approved up to $1.35 billion of special tax revenue bonds for a bigger convention center.

Rich Saskal

The bonds are backed with revenue from certain city hotel occupancy taxes and incremental state tax revenue generated within a project finance zone the city established in 2024. Amounts and timings for issuing the debt are being determined, according to the city, which filed a petition with a Travis County District Court for an expedited validation of the bonds. 

An ordinance approved in October to issue up to an initial $650 million of bonds for the project was rescinded by the council.

The city also plans to refund hotel occupancy tax-backed debt issued for the prior convention center in order to pledge a 4.5% hotel tax for the upcoming bonds. 

Advertisement

“The refunding bonds are a separate, but related item to the expansion bonds and will only be secured by 2% venue HOT,” city documents said. “The 2% venue HOT will not be pledged to the expansion bonds and will cease to be collected upon final maturity or early payoff of (the refunding bonds).” 

A petition drive that would have delayed the project fell 494 signatures short of a requirement for 20,000 valid signatures of registered voters, Austin City Clerk Erika Brady determined in November.

Petition backers are appealing a district court’s refusal to force validation in state appellate court after the Texas Supreme Court dismissed their petition for a writ of mandamus, according to attorneys.

The petition drive by Austin United PAC and others sought a ballot measure to stop the demolition and reconstruction of the convention center for seven years — or until the project was approved by voters — and prioritize city funding for local live music, arts, cultural, and outdoor tourism. 

The Austin City Council also approved as much as $1 billion of water and wastewater system revenue bonds last month for the Walnut Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant expansion and enhancement project. The bonds will be used to obtain a direct low-interest loan from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act program. 

Advertisement

Other financing sources for the $1.5 billion project are $59 million from the Texas Water Development Board Clean Water State Revolving Fund program and funding from Austin Water.

A groundbreaking for the project, which is aimed at improving treatment processes and protecting the Colorado River, was held in April.

The plant, which serves more than 50% of Austin and operates at a treatment capacity of 75 million gallons per day, will have its capacity increased to 100 MGD, helping meet future demand and requirements set by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality for Austin’s projected growth of 1.5 million by 2040, according to a city statement.

A legal logjam over a light rail system eased May 22 when the Texas Supreme Court finally ruled on a procedural issue related to an initial $150 million of bonds for the project. The high court ordered a Travis County Court judge to decide whether the bonds’ issuer, the Austin Transit Partnership, a nonprofit corporation created by the city and Capital Metro Transportation Authority, has standing to seek court validation for the debt.

City taxpayers who filed a lawsuit in 2023, along with the Texas Attorney General’s Office have been challenging the legality of the bonds, which would be paid off with a portion of Austin’s operation and maintenance property taxes voters approved in November 2020 for what was then billed as a 27-mile, 31-station light-rail project estimated to cost $7.1 billion.

Advertisement

Escalating costs led ATP to downsize Project Connect to an initial less than 10-mile, 15-station system with a similar price tag. The completion of a federal environmental review in January allowed the project to continue a process to seek billions of dollars in federal grants and loans.

ATP said Project Connect is moving forward with construction scheduled to begin next year.  

“We are confident in our case and look forward to our day in court,” ATP said in a statement. “The pending litigation has not slowed our progress advancing Austin light rail, which has hit major milestones in the federal funding process, design, and pre-construction work this year.” 

Bill Aleshire, an attorney who filed the taxpayers’ lawsuit, cautioned that several issues remain before the court, including the legality of the downsized project and the ability to pay off bonds with property tax revenue that is supposed to be used for operations. 

“Their federal funding is uncertain, their ability to issue bonds is uncertain, and they just stubbornly will not listen to us and say it’s time to pause Project Connect and rethink it, that maybe rail isn’t the best way to go at this time and maybe we can’t afford it at this time,” he said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending