Connect with us

Wisconsin

Meet the candidates running for Wisconsin’s 69th Assembly District seat

Published

on

Meet the candidates running for Wisconsin’s 69th Assembly District seat



Republican Karen Hurd, Democrat Roger Halls and Independent Joshua Kelly are running in the Nov. 5 election to represent Wisconsin’s 69th Assembly District.

The 69th Assembly District will elect a new representative as Republican Karen Hurd, Democrat Roger Halls and Independent Joshua Kelly compete for votes in the Nov. 5 general election.

The 69th Assembly District covers the cities of Medford, Neillsville, Abbotsford and Colby and the village Weston. The district lost the cities of Marshfield and Black River Falls and portions of Marathon and Jackson counties following the 2023 redistricting process.

Wisconsin State Assembly representatives serve two-year terms. Republican Donna Rozar has represented the district in two terms since 2021 but filed for noncandidacy as her residence is no longer in the district.

Advertisement

To learn more about registering to vote and to find your polling place, visit the My Vote Wisconsin website.

USA TODAY NETWORK-Wisconsin asked each of the candidates to address important issues in the district and why they are running for the position.

Roger Halls

Residence: Stanley

Age: 45

Occupation and education: I work in information technology for a medium-sized business. I have some college experience and currently attend Fox Valley Technical College for cyber security

Advertisement

Relevant experience: I sat on the City Council of Stanley for six years. I served four years active duty in the U.S. Army. I strongly believe in giving back to the community by working with Children’s Miracle Network, Big Brothers Big Sisters of Northwestern Wisconsin, and Wisconsin Father’s for Children and Families.

Campaign website/Facebook page: hallsforwi.com and Halls for Wisconsin on Facebook

Karen Hurd

Residence: Town of Withee

Advertisement

Age: 66

Occupation and education: Nutritionist. Truman State University, Kirksville, Missouri, bachelor’s degree in Spanish, May 1980; Huntington’s College of Health Sciences, Knoxville, Kentucky, diploma of comprehensive nutrition, May 1994 and reaffirmed through testing September 2014; University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, certificate in Grant Writing and Management, June 2007; University of Saint Joseph, West Hartford, Connecticut, master’s degree in biochemistry, December 2017; The George Washington University, Washington, D.C., Master of Public Health degree, August 2024.

Relevant experience: Representative to the Wisconsin State Assembly 68th District, elected in 2022 and currently serving. Village of Fall Creek Trustee from 2021-2024.

Campaign website: www.karenhurdforassembly.com

Joshua Kelly

Advertisement

Residence: Greenwood

Age: 42

Occupation and education: Stainless pipefitter, computer information systems

Relevant experience: I have no relevant experience besides being a voter myself. That being said, with my business I work with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Farm Service Agency and work hand in hand with other state agencies.

Why are you running for office?

Halls: As a father of three girls, and with family in the LGBTQ+ community, I believe their rights are being stripped away. With the Dobbs decision and 24 anti-LGBTQ bills brought up, I want those communities and my family to know they have people fighting for them. I would also like to see our communities flourish and our small businesses succeed, to do that, we need to expand child care, fully fund our schools, expand education, expand on rural broadband, and keep health care in our rural communities. All of these areas are either under attack, not appropriately funded or just ignored.

Advertisement

Hurd: To serve the people of Wisconsin by lowering taxes, prohibiting illegal immigrants from invading our country, making government smaller, giving local control back to the towns, villages and cities, making government fiscally responsible, reducing regulations, bringing down inflation and fixing the economy. I have seen the need for proven conservative leadership in our government.

Kelly: I would never let anyone do for me what I cannot do for myself, and if no one is going to fix these issues then I will just run and do what needs to be done myself.

What makes you the better candidate in this race?

Halls: I moved to Stanley after leaving the Army as a decorated two-tour Afghanistan/Iraq veteran with a Bronze Star. I’ve seen many places, but Wisconsin has always been my favorite. I want my home to thrive and succeed. I realize not everyone has the same story, life experiences and beliefs, but that is what makes us special. All I want is for people to have a happy, fulfilling life and even if that is currently out of reach for many Wisconsinites, I hope to change that. I will bring my open mind, empathy, compassion and humanity to the Wisconsin Assembly.

Hurd: My experience in local and state government, my work experience as a small business owner, as well as the time I spent in the U.S. Army. My ability to communicate both with constituents so that I might represent their thoughts on issues as well as fellow lawmakers in accomplishing my constituents’ desires.

Kelly: I am from where I run from and did not have to change my residency or change where I vote to do so just because I thought I might have a better chance of winning. I feel that I have the best interests in mind for my community. I feel that I am a good representation of the people who live here and would work tirelessly. Move heaven and earth to get done what is needed to get done. For the people and by the people.

Advertisement

What is the most pressing issue facing Wisconsin, and how would you address it?

Halls: There are many pressing issues facing Wisconsin today. From price gouging in almost every market, rural and mental health, education costs, cost of living, child care and many more. With farmers at the very heart of Wisconsin, I think the biggest issue is our chemical contamination, PFAS or forever chemicals. Cancer is more prevalent in areas of high contamination, and plant and animal contamination or death is more frequent. A healthy Wisconsin is more prosperous. There are companies that knew their product was dangerous and continued to push it for profit; they should be footing the bill for cleaning it up.

Hurd: The economy. Lowering taxes is one of the best ways to help the economy. The less taxes a person pays allows them more money to spend as they choose. That money will be spent on purchasing products or services, which then creates more demand for the product or service, which then stimulates the business to supply that demand, which means the business can grow − and compensate employees more/hire additional employees to facilitate that growth, which then gives those employees more money in their pocket so that they can purchase products or services − and the circle repeats thereby creating a healthy economy.

Kelly: The most pressing issue facing Wisconsin is the economy, and what I would do is lay the groundwork for a whole new industry in Wisconsin. One that brings new wealth to our state and our dying small towns. I would make all cannabis sold in the state of Wisconsin grown in the state of Wisconsin. I would mandate that it was grown in municipalities of less than 7,500 people. Unionize the whole industry and put a negative 2% tax on anything sold out of state. Anything sold here must be made here by Wisconsin-owned companies.  

What are residents telling you are their most important issues, and how would you address them?

Halls: This varies from community to community. All have grocery prices in the top 5. During COVID-19, supply lines got shut down. Demand was still high, but supply was low, so prices went up. Most supply lines have fully recovered, but prices have not gone down. Prices are still almost 21% higher than they were at the start of the pandemic; that is not how supply and demand work, that is how greed works. I would support legislation to stop price gouging and raise the minimum wage in Wisconsin.

Hurd: The economy, inflation, illegal immigration and high crime. These issues have to be addressed by lowering taxes, stopping illegal immigration and being tougher on crime.

Advertisement

Kelly: Residents are telling me about a wide array of issues that concern them from child care to lack of action in our government. What I would do to address these issues is to work both sides of the aisle. Get people to come together and work on what really needs to be done by compromise. Though we may be divided on how to solve problems. We should not be divided on the fact they still need to be solved, and if we cannot have a common discourse then we have all lost.

Residents of central Wisconsin are seeing increasing costs in necessary and everyday expenses such as housing, child care, groceries, health care and transportation. If elected, what will you do to help residents who are struggling to make ends meet?

Halls: I will work to expand affordable housing initiatives, promote zoning reforms and offer incentives for developers to build more affordable homes and apartments in central Wisconsin. I will advocate for increased state funding for child care subsidies and support the expansion of child care centers to make care more accessible and affordable for working families. I will push for Medicaid expansion and work to lower prescription drug costs, making health care more affordable and accessible for everyone. I will support policies that reduce price gouging on food and essential goods, including subsidies for local agriculture and supporting small businesses to keep costs down.

Hurd: Lower taxes. See answer above for how lowering taxes helps. Also, reducing government spending reduces inflation.

Kelly: I would like to bring good-paying jobs to our state, in the form of the cannabis industry. With no more than a 5% sales tax. Take .2% off the top and send it straight to the schools. Then take 2% and give it directly to the local municipalities from were it was grown or manufactured. A 2% portion would go to the state and the last .8% would go into a fund that would be distributed monthly to the people of Wisconsin. Anyone who makes less then $70,000 a year, with the people on the lower end receiving more than the top end on a bell curve model.

As costs have increased for individuals, so have the costs for our local units of government. Our local schools and technical colleges, municipalities and counties are limited in how much local tax levies can be raised. These limits were set decades ago and adjustments to them are rare and inadequate for matching increases in cost of living and inflation. If elected, what would you do at the state level to reduce the burden on local residents who have to consider levy limit referendums for school districts, public safety workers or large transportation projects so frequently in elections?

Halls: We can tie levy limits to inflation, allowing municipalities, counties and school districts to increase revenue as costs rise, reducing frequent referendums. Push for more funding for public education, transportation and public safety. Restoring support can ease the burden on taxpayers while maintaining essential services. Advocate for local control, allowing communities to decide their tax and spending without excessive state restrictions, ensuring resources are directed where they are most needed. Addressing these issues at the state level, we can reduce the reliance on levy limit referendums, help local governments better manage rising costs and ease the financial pressure on residents.

Advertisement

Hurd: In this last budget, we dramatically helped by increasing the shared revenue for all municipalities in the state. We also provided the municipalities with more general transportation aid (except for the towns as Governor Evers vetoed that increase using his partial veto power). We also made available $150 million for agricultural road improvement as well as continuing to fund the Local Road Improvement Program. We raised the per student cap by $325 per child for each year of the budget as well as increased funding substantially for categorical spending by schools. We will continue to work on funding for our roads, our municipalities and the students of Wisconsin.

Kelly: My answer for the last question addressed this.

Erik Pfantz covers local government and education in central Wisconsin for USA TODAY NETWORK – Wisconsin and values his background as a rural Wisconsinite. Contact him at epfantz@gannett.com.



Source link

Advertisement

Wisconsin

These Wisconsin swing voters say Trump’s war in Iran wasn’t worth it

Published

on

These Wisconsin swing voters say Trump’s war in Iran wasn’t worth it


Vessels are anchored along the Strait of Hormuz.

Amirhossein Khorgooei/ISNA/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Amirhossein Khorgooei/ISNA/AFP via Getty Images

The war in Iran was a costly blunder, according to swing voters in the battleground state of Wisconsin.

NPR observed two online focus groups on Tuesday featuring voters who supported Joe Biden in 2020 and then Donald Trump in 2024.

Advertisement

President Trump had just announced a framework agreement to end the war, which he signed on Wednesday.

Yet among the focus groups’ 13 participants, no one said they thought the conflict with Iran was “worth it,” and nine said they felt that the U.S. is coming out of this conflict weaker than before.

Corey M., a 33-year-old independent voter, said he is concerned that the U.S. expended “so much financially and so much of our arsenal,” with little to show for it. (All participants agreed to be part of the focus groups on the condition that they be identified by their first name and last initial only.)

“We essentially got nothing out of it,” he said. “It’s hurt our economy and increased expenses for the everyday American, and it accomplished the square root of nothing.”

Focus groups are not scientifically significant like polling. But they provide insight into how Americans are thinking about what they see in the news.

Advertisement

These focus groups — made up of 10 self-described independents, two Democrats and one Republican — were conducted by messaging and market research firms Engagious and Sago as part of the Swing Voter Project. NPR is a partner on the project.

Rich Thau, president of Engagious, moderated the focus groups. He has been asking voters in key states about this conflict since March. And he said voters have been consistent.

“They were never on board,” Thau said. “Not the beginning. Not in the middle. And as we just learned, not at the end either, judging from what we heard from Wisconsin swing voters.”

Sam M., a 30-year-old independent, said from what he read about the deal, it wasn’t leaving the U.S. in a better position than before the war. In fact, he said he thought the Iran nuclear deal brokered by the Obama administration — which Trump backed out of — was a better deal for the United States.



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

President of Wisconsin’s largest mosque released from ICE custody

Published

on

President of Wisconsin’s largest mosque released from ICE custody


A federal judge has ordered the release of the president of Wisconsin’s largest mosque, after finding that immigration officials probably detained him in retaliation against his public advocacy for Palestinian rights, suppressing his first amendment rights in the process.

The US district judge James Patrick Hanlon’s order on Thursday marked a sharp rebuke against Trump officials, including the secretary of state, Marco Rubio, who had tried to paint Salah Sarsour as a national security threat.

“Salah Sarsour, who has lived in this country for more than three decades and served as a core pillar in his community without any issues, should never have been detained in the first place,” his legal team wrote in a statement. “While we continue to fight these baseless claims in court, today is about celebrating a family being reunited. It is also a sober reminder that, if the government can target Mr Sarsour, everyone’s free speech rights are at risk.”

Sarsour describes himself as a stateless Palestinian, according to the order. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) says that he is a Jordanian citizen. He has lived in the United States for more than three decades, becoming a legal permanent resident in 1998. Immigration officials approved Sarsour’s citizenship application decades ago, though he did not naturalize.

Advertisement

Sarsour has garnered public attention as a champion for Palestinian rights, and serves as a board member of an advocacy group called American Muslims for Palestine.

But Rubio personally signed off on a memo to the DHS last year describing Sarsour as deportable despite his green card, because “his actions undermine US foreign policy to combat antisemitism around the world”. The memo, cited in Hanlon’s order, accuses Sarsour’s group of being “found to have been involved in activities providing funds to Hamas”.

A group of plainclothes ICE officers from at least 10 unmarked vehicles swarmed Sarsour on 30 March of this year, arresting him and putting him in deportation proceedings. ICE ultimately detained him in Clay county jail in Indiana.

Sarsour lost 30lb while detained, the order says. His lawyers told the court that he was “at constant risk of developing serious complications from diabetes given that the medical staff only checks his blood-sugar levels once a month”. Tightly controlling diabetes typically requires multiple glucose checks daily.

Hanlon’s order says that homeland security officials and Rubio probably trampled on Sarsour’s first amendment right to free speech and appeared to have arrested him in retaliation for his Palestinian rights advocacy.

Advertisement

The order cited a New York Times story and the website for the Heritage Foundation, the conservative thinktank that dreamed up Project 2025,

The Heritage Foundation presented the White House with the idea to present prominent foreign-born Muslims and Palestinian rights leaders as terrorists in order to sue them, deport them or pressure employers to fire them, the order says, citing reporting from the Times and Heritage’s own website. Sarsour was probably among the targets of that campaign, the order says.

The federal government, through its lawyers, contended that Sarsour should be deported based on two convictions from more than three decades ago in Israel – one for throwing a molotov cocktail and the other for attempting to store weapons and ammunition.

Sarsour denies having committed those crimes.

But Hanlon viewed those crimes as a non-issue for justifying his incarceration, noting that the federal government knew about them since the 1990s and approved his legal permanent residency and his citizenship application anyway.

Advertisement

Sarsour’s speech on Palestinian rights “is core political speech and squarely within the scope of the First Amendment”, the order says. “Mr Sarsour has submitted evidence allowing a reasonable inference that his protected speech was ‘at least a motivating factor’ in Respondents’ decision to detain him.”

A spokesperson for homeland security described Sarsour as a “terrorist”, citing the convictions from his youth in Israel.

Government lawyers had argued that Sarsour did not have the same first amendment rights as US citizens. If he were released, they said, he should have to pay a $25,000 bond, wear an ankle monitor, check in routinely with ICE and remain confined to his house.

Instead, Hanlon ordered his release on personal recognizance, meaning that Sarsour does not have to pay a cash bond to compel him to show up in court again. The order, however, requires him to remain in the state of Wisconsin.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Couple asks Wisconsin Supreme Court to hear Brewers 50-50 raffle prize dispute

Published

on

Couple asks Wisconsin Supreme Court to hear Brewers 50-50 raffle prize dispute


(WLUK) – A couple challenging the decision not to award them a 50-50 raffle prize at a Milwaukee Brewers game asked the Wisconsin Supreme Court to take the case, calling it one of “statewide importance.”

Matthew and Annette Flynn purchased ten raffle tickets at the July 7, 2023, game, and held the winning number which was originally selected for $13,000. According to court records, the raffle rules in effect at the time required the winning ticket holder to claim the prize at a designated 50-50 table by the end of the top of the seventh inning. Flynn said she did not see the winning number displayed or hear it announced and was directed by stadium personnel to another location before making her way to the claim table. Officials determined she did not arrive before the deadline and selected a new winning ticket.

The Flynns sued, but the circuit and appeals courts ruled the raffle’s rules gave the foundation sole discretion to determine the official winner and that the rules clearly stated a participant who failed to claim the prize within the specified time would be disqualified.

In a petition to the Wisconsin Supreme Court filed Wednesday, the Flynn’s asked the high court to take the case, saying the decision “affects not only the parties to this action but potentially every Wisconsin resident who participates in charitable raffles and similar gaming activities.”

Advertisement

“This case presents significant questions concerning contractual discretion, discovery, judicial review of charitable gaming decisions, and the treatment of digital evidence within Wisconsin’s appellate system. For these reasons, Petitioners respectfully request that this Court grant review of the decision of the Court of Appeals,” the petition states.

The high court does not have to take the case. At some point, it will vote on if to take it. If it does, a months-long process to review the issues will begin. If it does not, the appeals court ruling would stand.

According to the rules posted on the Milwaukee Brewers’ website, the deadline to claim the prize is no longer during the game the tickets were purchased.

Comment with Bubbles

BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT

Advertisement

“The Participant in possession of the Raffle ticket with the potential winning number may claim the Prize at the 50/50 Table located on the Loge (2nd) level concourse behind Sections 216/217 until such time as the Ballpark officially closes to fans after the end of the game. If the Participant in possession of the Raffle ticket with the potential winning number does not claim the Prize by the time the Ballpark closes to fans after the end of the game, that Participant may still claim the Prize within thirty (30) days after the conclusion of the Raffle Period for the respective baseball game by contacting the Raffle hotline (414-902-4334). A Prize that is not claimed within thirty (30) days after the conclusion of the Raffle Period will be awarded in compliance with applicable regulations,” the site states.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending