Connect with us

Wisconsin

How Wisconsin women’s basketball erased a 17-point deficit to beat Penn State

Published

on

How Wisconsin women’s basketball erased a 17-point deficit to beat Penn State


MADISON – Wisconsin women’s basketball coach Marisa Moseley issued a challenge to her team after its blowout loss to Northwestern last week and after a slow start Sunday the Badgers answered the call.

UW trailed by 17 in the second quarter and by 14 at the half before a super-charged second half that led to a 69-64 victory over Penn State front of 4,519 at the Kohl Center. It was the Badgers’ biggest comeback victory of the season and a much-needed outcome for a team that lost by 24 points to Northwestern last Sunday.

“What we talked about after our last loss was that we have a decision to make…,” Moseley said. “It’s really cool to see them really decide to go this direction and really take charge, You’re in charge of your own destiny in the way that you play. It was really cool to see them take another step towards that this afternoon.”

The Badgers (11-11, 4-8 Big Ten) locked down defensively, received another big-time performance from sophomore Serah Williams and turned off the faucet of turnovers that played such a large role in the team’s slow start.

Advertisement

The result was Wisconsin’s most impressive win of the season. Penn State (16-8, 7-6) entered play tied for fourth in the Big Ten with four of its wins over teams that beat the Badgers this season.

BOX SCORE: Wisconsin 69, Penn State 64

Williams, the team’s 6-foot-4 sophomore forward, extended her streak of double-doubles to nine straight. Her 31 points and 15 rebounds each tied her career highs. She also blocked three shots and had four steals.

No other Badger scored in double figures, but there were some quality stat lines.

Advertisement

Sophomore guard Ronnie Porter: eight points, five assists, five steals; senior guard Natalie Leuzinger: seven points, three assists, zero turnovers; senior Halle Douglass: eight points on 3-for-3 shooting and six rebounds; and sophomore Sania Copeland: six points, five assists, four steals.

Defensively the Badgers held Penn State to 16.7% (2-for-12) shooting in the third quarter and 29.7% for the second half. After a scoring 40 points in the first half, the Nittany Lions took almost 15 minutes to score 10 during the second half.

Penn State’s inability to score also provided it fewer chances to set up its press, which played a big role in the Nittany Lions’ 21 fast break points. And even when the press was on UW handled it much better during the final 20 minutes.

Graduate student Ashley Owusu, a 6-0 guard, had 24 points for Penn State, 16 in the first half. Junior guard Leilani Kapinus, a graduate of Madison Memorial High School, finished with 11 points and nine rebounds.

The effort of those players and their teammates wasn’t a match for UW resolve on this day.

Advertisement

“The past few games we’ve been down a lot, but we learned from those games and then kind of forget about them,” Leuzinger said. “This was a whole new game, especially in the second half.”

Here is a look at how the Badgers scored the comeback.

Fast start to second half allows UW to cut into deficit quickly

Wisconsin trailed, 40-26, at the half but scored 13 points during the first 4 minutes of the second half to get the deficit down to three points. For the sake of comparison, the Badgers managed 12 points in the first quarter and 14 in the second.

The Badgers had come all the way back by the 4:46 mark of the quarter when they grabbed their first lead of the night, 43-42, on a layup by Williams that came off a Porter steal.

The beginning of the first half was a 180-degree turn from the start of the game when Penn State hit its first seven shots and led by 11 points after 3 ½ minutes.

Advertisement

“Just being able to come out like that it just shows that we’re capable of doing that in any situation like that during the game,” Leuzinger said. “It just not only brings a lot of momentum for this game but for the next couple of games we have.”

Serah Williams’ dominance showed in the second half

Williams’ stat line from the second half was impressiver: 23 points on 8-for-9 shooting with nine rebounds, two blocks and two steals. She also didn’t turn the ball over in the second half after having four in the first half, an improvement she credited to better communication in the second half.

Her production was consistent throughout the second half. She had 11 points and hit five of six shots in the third quarter. In the fourth, she had 12 points and went 3 for 3 from the floor and 6 for 6 from the free throw line.

Her ninth double-double moved her out of a tie for the all-time mark by Milwaukee native Theresa Huff, who set the mark during the 1982-83 season.

“I was just trying to play my game and be consistent with how I play all season,” Williams said. “I know if I just bring that intensity I can help my team the best way I can. … I didn’t really catch the ball in the paint today. It was just running and trusting my teammates to get me the ball where I could (make a move).”

Advertisement

Wisconsin did the job defensively down the stretch

Wisconsin went from trailing by 17 to leading by eight, 55-47, with 8 minutes left. Penn State, however, was due for a run and it came through with 10-2 spurt to tie the game with 3:20 to play. The game was also tied at 60 with 2:54 to go.

The Badgers closed the game with stops on five of their final seven defensive possessions. Four of those stops came when it was a one-possession game.

UW also went 7 for 7 from the line with freshman D’Yanis Jimenez giving her team its final margin of victory with two free throws with 3 seconds left.

“I wrote on the board before the game the word relentless and in my pre-game speech I told our team in order to win this game we have to be relentless,” Moseley said. “Relentless in the way we pursue the ball. Relentless in how we play defense, taking care of the ball. Every loose ball, every hustle play had to be ours … I couldn’t be more proud of the complete team effort. It really did take the entire group.”



Source link

Advertisement

Wisconsin

How tariffs are affecting Wisconsin’s real and artificial Christmas trees

Published

on

How tariffs are affecting Wisconsin’s real and artificial Christmas trees


Nearly all artificial Christmas trees in the world today are made in China. And with that comes an up to 30 percent tariff rate on imported Christmas products — including artificial trees. 

Kris Reisdorf is co-president of the Racine- and Sturtevant-based home and garden store Milaeger’s. On WPR’s “Wisconsin Today,” Reisdorf said tariffs are affecting their prices on artificial trees, but she’s mitigating most of the rate hike through negotiations with manufacturers and by taking on lower profit margins herself. 

“We are doing our fair share in making Christmas affordable,” Reisdorf said. “When the average person is thinking 30 percent (tariffs), that’s not by any means what they’re really paying.”

News with a little more humanity

WPR’s “Wisconsin Today” newsletter keeps you connected to the state you love without feeling overwhelmed. No paywall. No agenda. No corporate filter.

Advertisement

Milaeger’s “almost real” trees range from under $100 to well over $3,000. Reisdorff said she’s raised prices for all artificial trees by only around $20 compared to last year.

Residorf said tree sales are largely stable despite the uptick in tariff pricing.

An ABC News/Washington Post poll last year found that 58 percent of Americans were buying artificial trees instead of real ones. That’s up from 40 percent in 2010. 

Advertisement

Greg Hann owns Hann’s Christmas Farm in Oregon. Hann also sits on the Wisconsin Christmas Tree Producers Association Board and is president-elect of the National Christmas Tree Association. 

Hann told “Wisconsin Today” the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 created a surge in business for real evergreen trees and that demand has been holding relatively steady ever since. That said, Hann acknowledged real Christmas tree sales are up for him and fellow growers this year. He attributed the increase in sales to the tariffs and the fact that farmers’ supplies are finally catching up to the higher demand brought on by COVID-19. Nearly all real trees come from the United States or Canada, according to Hann. 

Hann said a recent survey by the National Christmas Tree Association found 84 percent of Christmas tree growers nationwide have kept prices the same over the last two years, and that includes his own farm. Being grown locally in Wisconsin, Hann said his business is largely unaffected by tariffs.

“It’s kind of nice to have a good supply with a stable price in this economy,” he said. 

Reisdorf said that some artificial tree manufacturers are moving operations outside of China to places like Cambodia. But most other countries in the east are also facing tariff threats. 

Advertisement

Instead, Reisdorf said artificial tree importers are lobbying President Donald Trump to lower his 30 percent tariffs on Christmas products like trees and ornaments, because those kinds of goods aren’t coming back to be made in the U.S.

Meanwhile, Hann said his organization is lobbying to have tariffs on artificial trees increased to 300 percent. He said the added tariff costs help create an “even playing field” between real and artificial trees, since farmers have to pay farm staff and cover fertilizer costs. 

But it isn’t always about the cost. Reisdorf said artificial trees have the benefit of lasting “forever,” essentially.

Hann said many of his customers come to the farm looking to keep up the Christmas tradition of picking out their own family tree. 

“They’re looking for that fragrance of a real tree,” he said. “They want to start that tradition of the family together. They pick the tree, they take it into their house.” 

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin loses starting offensive lineman to the transfer portal

Published

on

Wisconsin loses starting offensive lineman to the transfer portal


In a bit of a surprise, Wisconsin Badgers starting center Jake Renfro is using a medical hardship year and entering the transfer portal for his final season of eligibility.

Renfro, a sixth-year senior in 2024, battled numerous injuries this season, limiting him to only four games after having season-ending surgery. He was a full-time starter for Wisconsin in 2024 after missing the entire 2023 season except for the team’s bowl game due to injury.

Prior to his time at Wisconsin, Renfro had played for head coach Luke Fickell at Cincinnati for three seasons. He played in seven games as a freshman in 2020, making six starts at center. He then was the full-time starter as a sophomore in 2021, earning All-AAC honors before missing the entire 2022 season due to injury.

Now, he’s set to come back to college football for a seventh year, rather than turn pro, and will look to do so at another school.

Advertisement

“I want to thank Coach Fickell, the entire coaching and training staff, my teammates, and the University of Wisconsin for everything over the past three seasons,” Renfro wrote. “I am grateful for the support, development, friendships, and memories I have made during my time in Madison. After much prayer and consideration, I have decided to enter the transfer portal and use a medical hardship year to continue my college football journey. I will always appreciate my time as a Badger.”

Renfro was one of the biggest supporters of Fickell publicly, being a vocal leader on the team as the starting center.

With his departure, Wisconsin could need a new starting left tackle, left guard, and center next season, depending on whether Joe Brunner heads to the NFL or returns for another season.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin’s match vs Stanford puts Alicia Andrew across net from sister

Published

on

Wisconsin’s match vs Stanford puts Alicia Andrew across net from sister


play

  • Sisters Alicia and Lizzy Andrew will face each other in the NCAA volleyball tournament regional semifinals.
  • Alicia is a redshirt senior middle blocker for Wisconsin, while Lizzy is a sophomore middle blocker for Stanford.
  • Alicia and Lizzy Andrew have similarities on and off the court as they each contribute to college volleyball powerhouses.

MADISON — It did not take long for Alicia Andrew to text her younger sister after watching the NCAA volleyball selection show with her Wisconsin teammates in a lounge area in the south end zone of Camp Randall Stadium.

“I was like, ‘Girl!’” Andrew said. “She’s like, ‘I know! I’ll see you in Texas! And I was like, ‘I’m so excited!’”

Advertisement

Andrew will not see her younger sister in the Gregory Gym stands like any other family members, but rather on the court as an opposing player in the Badgers’ NCAA tournament regional semifinal match against Stanford.

Alicia Andrew is a 6-foot-3 redshirt senior middle blocker for Wisconsin. Lizzy Andrew is a 6-foot-5 sophomore middle blocker for Stanford. The sisters will play against each other for the first time with a spot in the NCAA regional finals on the line.

“Certainly when you’re having two high-level Division I starters on teams that are top five, top 10 in the country playing the same position, that’s pretty unique,” Wisconsin coach Kelly Sheffield said. “They’re both talented and competitive. But I also know that the players aren’t going to make it about themselves or the person that’s on the other side of the net. They’re parts of teams that are trying to move on and move forward and play great volley.”

Alicia has naturally fielded questions about the sibling rivalry, but she is “not reading too much into rivalry stuff and just playing this sport.”

Advertisement

“It’s another game,” she said after a recent UW practice. “Yes, it’s her across the net. But it’s a business. We both want to move on to the next round.”

Both players have played key parts in their respective teams’ path to this stage.

Alicia, after transferring from Baylor, is the only UW player to appear in all 98 sets this season and one of five to appear in all 30 matches. She is second on the team with 111 blocks, barely trailing fellow middle blocker Carter Booth’s 119.

“Really wants to be good for the people around her,” Sheffield said of Alicia. “Wants to do her job. Takes pride in her job. There’s a maturity, but yet there’s a playfulness that is a really good balance for her. Love coaching her. She’s wired the right way. She really is.”

Advertisement

Lizzy, meanwhile, ranks seventh in the country with a .441 hitting percentage in 2025 after earning a spot on the all-ACC freshman team in 2024. She also has experience playing with the U.S. U21 national team.

“I’m so proud of how hard she worked and her journey to Stanford,” Alicia said. “She puts in so much work, and she just loves the sport of volleyball. And I have loved watching her grow. It’s been fun to see her get better and better every year. And this past season, she’s been playing lights out.”

That pride has turned Alicia into a frequent viewer of ACC volleyball, of course whenever it has not conflicted with the Badgers’ own matches.

“We try to watch as many of each other’s games as we can, and I always just love watching her play,” she said. “I’m so proud of her. She’s just worked her tail off at Stanford, so to see her excel has been so fun.”

The Andrew sisters — Alicia, Lizzy and Natalie, who is on the rowing team at the U.S. Naval Academy — competed together in high school. (They also have a younger brother, William.) Competing against each other is a new concept for them, though.

Advertisement

“We’re not huge trash talkers, neither one of us,” Alicia said. “So I think that she’s going to play her game. I’m going to play my game. We’re going to have our heads down. There might be some looking across and smiling because we make the exact same expressions and quirky faces and reactions.”

The sisters don’t look the same – Lizzy has blonde hair and Alicia has brown hair. But Alicia quickly sees the resemblance with those on-court mannerisms.

“If there’s a silly play or if there is like a really unexpected dump or something, she’ll turn around and make the exact same face that I will,” Alicia said. “And it’s funny watching her on TV because I’m like, ‘Wow, that looks scary familiar.’”

Advertisement

They have some similarities off the court, too.

“We’re just goobers,” Alicia said. “We just like to have a good time together. Obviously she’s my little sister, but we have always been a close family — like all the siblings — so I feel like we’ve done all the things together growing up in all the sports.”

The Andrew parents are perhaps the biggest winners of the NCAA tournament bracket.

“My parents were super excited,” Alicia said. “They don’t have to split the travel plan, so they can save some frequent flyer miles there and both be in Texas. … They’re always trying to coordinate all the schedules.”

The Andrew family made T-shirts for the unique sisterly matchup. (Alicia thinks she is getting one considering they asked her and Lizzy for their shirt sizes in the family group chat.) The shirts are black, too, so there is no favoritism between Wisconsin and Stanford’s variations of cardinal red.

Advertisement

“They have a Stanford ‘S’ and a tree on it and then a Wisconsin ‘W’ and a little Badger on it, too,” Andrew said. “They’re really excited about these shirts. They’re being non-biased; they’re repping both daughters.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending