Connect with us

Wisconsin

Absentee ballot spoiling ruling put on hold by Wisconsin appeals court

Published

on

Absentee ballot spoiling ruling put on hold by Wisconsin appeals court


A Wisconsin appeals court docket on Monday placed on maintain a decrease court docket’s ruling from final week prohibiting voters from canceling their unique absentee poll and casting a brand new one, blocking at the least briefly the order sought by a conservative group based by distinguished Republicans.

The appeals court docket granted the Wisconsin Elections Fee’s request for a brief keep whereas the court docket determined whether or not to listen to the attraction on the apply often known as poll spoiling. The appeals court docket gave each side till midday on Wednesday to submit arguments.

What occurs to your poll on Election Day

Advertisement


The authorized battle comes as Wisconsin voters are returning absentee ballots for the Nov. 8 election. Thus far, simply wanting 110,000 absentee ballots have been returned, simply over one quarter of the almost 401,000 that had been requested, in keeping with the elections fee.

Individuals are additionally studying…

Advertisement

Democratic Gov. Tony Evers and Republican U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson are each on the poll in tight races.

The order from the appeals court docket got here because the elections fee was in closed session of an emergency assembly Monday known as partly to react to the court docket ruling.

The order from Waukesha County Circuit Choose Brad Schimel, a former Republican lawyer basic, required the elections fee to tell municipal clerks and native election officers by 7 p.m. Monday that its steerage on poll spoiling issued Aug. 1 had been withdrawn. Schimel additionally forbid the fee from issuing any future steerage associated to poll spoiling that’s not allowed beneath the legislation.

Restoring Integrity and Belief in Elections filed the lawsuit final month. The group was created in July by former U.S. Lawyer Common William Barr, longtime Republican strategist Karl Rove, GOP donor Steve Wynn and others. It has additionally filed election-related lawsuits within the battleground states of Arizona and Pennsylvania.

Poll spoiling received extra consideration in Wisconsin in the course of the August main after a Republican candidate for governor and three high Democratic candidates for U.S. Senate dropped out of the races, however their names had been nonetheless on the ballots. The elections fee made clear then that voters who had forged their ballots for one among them absentee may spoil it and vote once more for somebody nonetheless within the race.

Advertisement

RITE argued that the apply in Wisconsin is each towards the legislation and creates further alternatives for fraud and confusion.

The Democratic Nationwide Committee joined the bipartisan Wisconsin Elections Fee in preventing the lawsuit.

Wisconsin’s elections fee and its steerage grew to become a goal after Donald Trump narrowly misplaced Wisconsin in 2020, an consequence that’s withstood quite a few lawsuits, two partial recounts, a nonpartisan audit and partisan evaluations.

A choose final month dominated that fee steerage permitting election clerks to fill in lacking info on a witness certification for absentee ballots was unlawful and should be rescinded. Two different lawsuits are pending searching for orders on what constitutes sufficient of an deal with for an absentee poll to be accepted.

An outline of elections administration in Wisconsin.

Advertisement

Let’s check out how we preserve safety and integrity with all of our elections.

Advertisement

The ins-and-outs of voter processes like registering to vote and requesting a poll to vote absentee.

Advertisement

See what it’s prefer to go to the polls and vote.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Wisconsin

Wisconsin had record-high number of voters Tuesday, based on preliminary totals

Published

on

Wisconsin had record-high number of voters Tuesday, based on preliminary totals


play

Wisconsin had its most voters ever in Tuesday’s election, according to preliminary vote totals.

As of about 4 p.m. Tuesday, at least 3,415,306 Wisconsinites had voted in the presidential election, per the Associated Press. That’s with 99% of the vote reported and not including write-in votes for president, meaning the final voter total will be higher.

Advertisement

Wisconsin’s previous record turnout was in 2020, when just over 3.3 million voters cast a ballot in the general election., according to Wisconsin Elections Commission data since 1948.

Though the WEC hasn’t released final vote totals for the 2024 general election, Tuesday’s unofficial numbers would beat that record by at least 100,000 voters.



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Could Kamala Harris call for a recount in Wisconsin? Here’s what state law says

Published

on

Could Kamala Harris call for a recount in Wisconsin? Here’s what state law says


play

Republican Donald Trump has been declared the winner of the presidential election in Wisconsin, besting Vice President Kamala Harris.

With about 99% of Wisconsin’s ballots counted, Trump has a roughly 30,000 vote lead. That amounts to a little under one percentage point advantage, which would make the race eligible for a recount. With his victory in Wisconsin, the state’s 10 electoral votes pushed Trump over the 270 threshold and cemented his unprecedented return to the White House. 

Advertisement

Harris has not called for a recount in Wisconsin, but if she does, here’s how the process would work.

What is the margin required for a recount in Wisconsin?

In an election with more than 4,000 votes — which applies to the presidential race — the trailing candidate can demand a recount when the margin between the candidates is no more than one percent of the total votes cast.

There is no automatic recount in Wisconsin, even if the unofficial results are extremely close, according to the Wisconsin Elections Commission’s manual for a recount.

Does a candidate have to pay for a recount in Wisconsin?

If the margin between the two candidates is 0.25% or less, the state pays for the recount. If the margin is above 0.25%, the campaign has to pay for the recount.

Advertisement

So, under the current margin, Harris would have to pay for the recount.

The Wisconsin Elections Commission would estimate the costs of the recount, such as personnel and travel costs and equipment rental fees, likely totaling a few million dollars.

Would the 2024 election recount take place statewide?

This isn’t clear yet. The petitioning candidate can specify that they want the entire election recounted, or just specific municipalities. Unlike local races or state legislative races, presidents are elected statewide.

The 2020 presidential recount in Wisconsin, for example, was a partial recount of results in Dane and Milwaukee counties.

If the trailing candidate requests a partial recount, the leading candidate can expand the recount in additional wards or municipalities.

Advertisement

What happened in the 2020 presidential recount in Wisconsin?

Following the 2020 presidential election, Donald Trump requested a recount in some Wisconsin counties, as well as Georgia. The Wisconsin Election Commission ordered a partial recount of results in Dane and Milwaukee counties after receiving a $3 million payment from the Trump campaign. 

The recount was completed on Nov. 29, 2020, and the Chair of the Wisconsin Election Commissions signed the canvass statement for the election and recount on Nov. 30.

On Jan. 14, 2021, WEC issued a refund to the Trump campaign for about $545,000, which was the amount under the $3 million estimated cost of the recount.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin Rapids election results: Wisconsin State Senate and Assembly

Published

on

Wisconsin Rapids election results: Wisconsin State Senate and Assembly



Wisconsin Rapids-area voters on Tuesday elected several familiar faces to the state Senate and state Assembly.

Wisconsin Rapids-area voters on Tuesday elected several familiar faces to the state Senate and state Assembly. One race − Wisconsin’s 71st Assembly District − remained too close to call early Wednesday morning.

Here’s a closer look at those races.

Advertisement

Senate District 24

Patrick Testin defeated Collin McNamara for the District 24 seat in the Wisconsin State Senate. Testin has served two terms in the seat since 2017.

Testin, 36, is a Stevens Point resident who earned a bachelor’s degree in political science from the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point and was a Bowhay Institute for Legislative Leadership Development Fellow in 2018.

In a press release sent at 11:46 p.m. Tuesday, Testin shared he was honored the people of the 24th district voted for Testin to continue representing them.

“Tonight’s victory is a triumph of record over rhetoric, and I’m thrilled to be able to continue getting real results for the people of central and western Wisconsin,” he said in the announcement.

Advertisement

Here are the unofficial election night results as provided by the Associated Press. As of 12:27 a.m. Wednesday, 85.93% of estimated votes were in:

  • Patrick Testin (i): 51,750 (58.7%)
  • Collin McNamara: 36,402 (41.3%)

Assembly District 71 

Democrat Vinnie Miresse was leading Republican Bob Pahmeier for the District 71 seat in the Wisconsin State Assembly as of 1 a.m. Wednesday, but the race remained too close to call. Democrat Katrina Shankland served six terms in the seat since 2013 before filing for noncandidacy for the seat while she pursued candidacy for the 3rd Congressional District seat.

Here are the results as of 1 a.m. Wednesday, and we will update when they become official.

  • Miresse: 18,631 (53.2%)
  • Pahmeier: 16,417 (46.8%)

Assembly District 72

Scott Krug defeated Suzanne Campbell for the District 72 seat in the Wisconsin State Assembly. Krug has served seven terms in the seat since 2011.

Krug, 48, is a Rome resident who is a real estate agent with NextHome Partners in Wisconsin Rapids, serves as Adams County supervisor for District 18 and is a member of the Tri Lakes Management District in Rome. Krug earned an associate degree in criminal justice from Mid-State Technical College and a bachelor’s degree in psychology from the University of Wisconsin-Green Bay.

Advertisement

Here are the unofficial election night results as provided by the Associated Press. As of midnight, 77.22% of estimated votes were in:

  • Scott Krug (i): 18,772 (65.3%)
  • Suzanne Campbell: 9,958 (34.7%)

Assembly District 86

John Spiros defeated John Small for the District 86 seat in the Wisconsin State Assembly. Spiros has served six terms in the seat since 2013.

Spiros, 62, is a Marshfield resident who served six years in the U.S. Air Force before earning an associate degree in criminal justice and serving as a police officer. Spiros is currently the vice president of safety and claims at Roehl Transportation.

Here are the unofficial election night results as provided by the Associated Press. As of midnight, 87.09% of estimated votes were in:

  • John Spiros (i): 23,329 (67%)
  • John Small: 11,511 (33%)
Advertisement

Erik Pfantz covers local government and education in central Wisconsin for USA TODAY NETWORK – Wisconsin and values his background as a rural Wisconsinite. Contact him at epfantz@gannett.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending