Wisconsin
A few small Wisconsin towns are rejecting federal coronavirus relief funding
Lots of of hundreds of thousands of {dollars} in federal coronavirus aid funding are being funneled to native governments throughout Wisconsin as a part of the American Rescue Plan Act, a large federal stimulus package deal.
However a couple of small Wisconsin communities have turned down the cash.
4 Wisconsin communities — the city of Wooden River, the city of Large Falls, the village of Conrath and the city of Piehl — rejected a complete of $129,266. That is a miniscule fraction of the $410 million despatched to greater than 1,800 small communities throughout Wisconsin.
The state’s Division of Income took accountability for distributing the help to these small communities, that are generally known as non-entitlement models and sometimes have populations below 50,000. Bigger jurisdictions, together with many cities and counties, obtained the federal funding instantly.
Nationwide knowledge: Rejecting ARPA support is uncommon
Throughout the nation, it has been uncommon for communities to show down ARPA funding, and the locations which have completed so are usually very small, mentioned Mike Wallace, a legislative director for the Nationwide League of Cities.
“The calculation they’re making is, ‘How a lot would it not price to manage this program regionally, versus how a lot we’d have the ability to plug again into the financial system, both by serving to residents or sustaining authorities companies and operations?’” Wallace mentioned. “And I feel that, for the smallest grantees, the quantity of funds is actually too small to undergo the executive burden.”
The league analyzed how 15 states allotted funding from the historic stimulus package deal and located that, inside that pattern, lower than 3 % of the communities with populations below 50,000 had chosen to say no funding. The typical inhabitants of a neighborhood that turned down the cash was 261 individuals, and was eligible for lower than $100,000.
“It is exceedingly small quantities,” Wallace mentioned. “What that actually tells us is that the funding, the grants that went to native governments — they had been essential. They had been wanted.”
Throughout the nation, municipalities bought $65 billion from the $1.9 trillion rescue package deal, and the potential for these {dollars} is “very versatile,” Wallace mentioned.
Amongst different makes use of, native governments may institute premium pay for important employees or put money into infrastructure, like broadband web or water and sewer tasks. The cash may be spent instantly on COVID-19 mitigation — issues like enhancing air flow at a county constructing — in addition to a broader vary of public well being tasks, like stopping violence. Moreover, communities can provide help to teams deemed to have been damage disproportionately by the pandemic, and that is ranged from grants to companies to emergency housing vouchers to at-risk households. Plus, native governments can use a part of the funds for administrative and payroll prices wanted to manage ARPA packages themselves.
Why some Wisconsin cities are rejecting the help
The city of Large Falls in rural Rusk County was slated to obtain ARPA funding in 2020 and 2021. However Jim Jennerman, who works as Large Falls’ part-time clerk, mentioned he does not imagine the city of round 100 individuals has a lot use for the cash. In 2020, Large Falls solely had $117,171 in whole bills, in keeping with Wisconsin’s Division of Income.
“We’re a sufficiently small neighborhood that we actually weren’t impacted all that a lot by COVID itself,” Jennerman mentioned.
Large Falls would have obtained a complete of $13,293. By comparability, town of Milwaukee obtained greater than $394 million and Madison bought $47 million.
Small Wisconsin communities had till mid-2021 to let the state know in the event that they deliberate to simply accept the cash. The overwhelming majority of locations that did settle for now have till 2024 to earmark the funding for particular makes use of, and till the tip of 2026 to spend it.
“It was lots of paperwork piled on high of all the opposite paperwork that clerks must do — that me, as a 71-year-old retired particular person, do not actually must waste my time doing,” Jennerman mentioned.
Though the cash would have been delivered as a grant relatively than mortgage needing reimbursement, Jennerman added, “I nonetheless needed to report every little thing that I bought, and the state had their hooks on me sufficient as it’s.”
Farther north in Oneida County, the 90-person city of Piehl rejected $8,896 in COVID-19 funding. Piehl’s funds is small — lower than $100,000 — and the pandemic did not have a lot impression on each day operations, the city’s chair Joseh Dessellier mentioned.
“All we needed to do was purchase some cleansing provides for the elections and that is it,” Dessellier mentioned. “We’ve got no different services on the town.”
Officers with the City of Wooden River in Burnett County and the village of Conrath in Rusk County couldn’t be reached for remark. Wooden River, which has fewer than 1,000 residents, turned down $97,446. Fewer than 100 individuals dwell in Conrath, which rejected $9,629 from the stimulus package deal.
Wisconsin
Wisconsin Lottery Mega Millions, Pick 3 results for Dec. 24, 2024
Manuel Franco claims his $768 million Powerball jackpot
Manuel Franco, 24, of West Allis was revealed Tuesday as the winner of the $768.4 million Powerball jackpot.
Mark Hoffman, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
The Wisconsin Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big. Here’s a look at Dec. 24, 2024, results for each game:
Winning Mega Millions numbers from Dec. 24 drawing
11-14-38-45-46, Mega Ball: 03, Megaplier: 3
Check Mega Millions payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Pick 3 numbers from Dec. 24 drawing
Midday: 7-9-6
Evening: 2-0-2
Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Pick 4 numbers from Dec. 24 drawing
Midday: 9-8-7-5
Evening: 6-3-7-0
Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning All or Nothing numbers from Dec. 24 drawing
Midday: 03-04-06-07-09-10-14-16-17-18-19
Evening: 02-05-07-08-12-13-17-18-19-20-21
Check All or Nothing payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Badger 5 numbers from Dec. 24 drawing
05-19-22-23-24
Check Badger 5 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning SuperCash numbers from Dec. 24 drawing
02-03-06-30-31-34, Doubler: N
Check SuperCash payouts and previous drawings here.
Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results
Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize
- Prizes up to $599: Can be claimed at any Wisconsin Lottery retailer.
- Prizes from $600 to $199,999: Can be claimed in person at a Lottery Office. By mail, send the signed ticket and a completed claim form available on the Wisconsin Lottery claim page to: Prizes, PO Box 777 Madison, WI 53774.
- Prizes of $200,000 or more: Must be claimed in person at the Madison Lottery office. Call the Lottery office prior to your visit: 608-261-4916.
Can Wisconsin lottery winners remain anonymous?
No, according to the Wisconsin Lottery. Due to the state’s open records laws, the lottery must, upon request, release the name and city of the winner. Other information about the winner is released only with the winner’s consent.
When are the Wisconsin Lottery drawings held?
- Powerball: 9:59 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
- Mega Millions: 10:00 p.m. CT on Tuesday and Friday.
- Super Cash: 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
- Pick 3 (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
- Pick 3 (Evening): 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
- Pick 4 (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
- Pick 4 (Evening): 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
- All or Nothing (Day): 1:30 p.m. CT daily.
- All or Nothing (Evening): 9 p.m. CT daily.
- Megabucks: 9:00 p.m. CT on Wednesday and Saturday.
- Badger 5: 9:00 p.m. CT daily.
Missed a draw? Peek at the past week’s winning numbers.
This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Wisconsin editor. You can send feedback using this form.
Wisconsin
Wisconsin RB enters transfer portal. NCAA waiver gives senior another year of eligibility
An aerial view of Camp Randall Stadium in Madison, Wis.
An aerial view of Camp Randall Stadium in Madison, Wis., home of the Wisconsin Badgers.
MADISON – A recent court ruling has opened the door for former junior college players to gain another year of NCAA eligibility.
It appears that Tawee Walker is going to take advantage of the opportunity.
According to On3, Wisconsin’s senior running back will enter the transfer portal in search of a home for next season. The news came one day after the NCAA approved a blanket waiver granting one more year of eligibility to athletes who competed at a non-NCAA school for one or more years and would have otherwise exhausted their eligibility during the 2024-25 school year.
Walker fits the bill. He played the the 2021 season at Palomar College. a junior college in San Marcos, California, before competing for Oklahoma in 2022 and ’23 and Wisconsin this season. The NCAA counts his junior college season towards his four years of college eligibility.
The waiver stems from a case brought forward by Vanderbilt quarterback Diego Pavia. A Tennessee court ruled that counting the two seasons he played at a junior college toward his NCAA eligibility violated the Sherman Antitrust Act.
Walker, a 5-foot-9, 218-pound Las Vegas native, led the Badgers with 864 yards in 190 carries, a 4.5-yard average, and scored 10 touchdowns.
He begin the season sharing the No. 1 tailback role with Chez Mellusi and blossomed after Mellusi took what proved to be a permanent leave Oct. 3.
As Wisconsin’s primary ball carrier Walker ran for 718 yards in 152 carries, a 4.7-yard average, with nine touchdowns.
His best stretch was a three-game run against Purdue, Rutgers and Northwestern when he gained 418 yards in 66 carries, a 6.3-yard average, and scored six times.
Wisconsin
2024 Wisconsin Badgers Positional Review: Safeties
2024 Wisconsin Badgers Positional Review: Safeties
Wisconsin football saw its season end without bowl practices for the first time since 2001. The Badgers hit a new low this century in year two of the Luke Fickell era, and will face a critical get-right year in 2025.
Over the next two weeks, BadgerBlitz.com will examine the 2024 Badgers position by position. Today, we’ll wrap up the series with the safeties, a unit that helped anchor a strong defensive backfield in 2024.
POSITIONAL REVIEWS: Quarterbacks | Running Backs | Wide Receivers | Tight Ends | Offensive Line | Defensive Line | Outside Linebackers | Inside Linebackers | Cornerbacks
2024 HIGH: Preston Zachman’s continued development
Redshirt senior Preston Zachman continued his development into a highly reliable safety in 2024, and even better news? He’s coming back next fall.
Zachman became somewhat of a surprise starter alongside Hunter Wohler last season, but he played well in the process, displaying his football IQ and a knack for being in the right place in the right time. He continued to take steps in a positive direction this season, posting a career-best stat-line of 58 total tackles, 2.5 tackles-for-loss, two interceptions and four pass breakups.
The safety has a penchant for making routine plays routinely. He missed just six tackles on 753 total snaps, per Pro Football Focus. He also surrendered just one touchdown across 366 coverage snaps. But Zachman can also make the big play. His most impressive rep of the season was likely his interception in Los Angeles, pictured above. In coverage against dynamic slot weapon Zachariah Branch, a matchup most would deem a mismatch, he blanketed the receiver, bodied him at the catch point, reeled in the interception and talked smack in the star pass-catcher’s face after the whistle.
The ball skills he displayed were impressive, but it was also a clinic in technique and positioning. Zachman is one of the most fundamentally sound players on Mike Tressel‘s defense, and his return for 2025 is massive for a secondary that figures to be relatively inexperienced and also just lost its best player in Wohler.
2024 LOW: Hunter Wohler vs. USC
Interestingly enough, one of Zachman’s best games (USC) was also one of Wohler’s worst. He gave up two touchdowns in the second half alone, helping the Trojans complete the comeback victory.
With time dwindling in the third quarter, USC faced a 3rd-and-7 from the Badgers eight yard-line. Wisconsin sent six pass-rushers after Trojans’ quarterback Miller Moss, leaving five one-on-ones in coverage against a five wide look. That included Wohler on the 6-foot-6 wideout Duce Robinson.
Robinson ran a skinny post and simply boxed Wohler out to reel in a touchdown, looking like a forward pulling down a rebound over a guard. It’s hard to blame Wohler for giving up four inches of height to the physical specimen of a wideout, but still, the safety was directly responsible for that touchdown.
Wohler gave up a touchdown on the very next drive as well. The Trojans marched down the field in nine plays but were faced with a 4th-and-1 on the Badgers’ seven yard line. Moss ran a read option, and kept the ball with outside linebacker Aaron Witt crashing off the strong side. Wohler read the play well, and came face-to-face with Moss in the open field. If he made the tackle, it would’ve been a turnover on downs. Instead, Moss hit him with a filthy spin move, breaking the safety’s ankles and scoring a touchdown. Another straight-up mano a mano that Wohler lost resulting in a touchdown, on consecutive drives no less.
ONE STORYLINE TO FOLLOW BEFORE THE 2025 SEASON: Which transfer nabs a starting role?
With the return of Zachman and Austin Brown, Wisconsin is in a solid spot at safety. The Badgers have two experienced starters, in addition to a plethora of young players including four true freshmen. Zachman and Brown both figure to be starters given their experience and solid play in 2024. But if we’ve learned anything about Tressel’s defense over the course of two seasons, it’s that he deploys three safeties frequently. Especially given the fact that Wisconsin figures to be inexperienced at cornerback with just four corners currently on the roster, safeties can be expected to play plenty of snaps.
The Badgers have signed two transfers at safety at the time of writing: Matthew Traynor (FCS Richmond) and Matt Jung (D-III Bethel). Traynor is a versatile safety who can line up anywhere, while Jung absolutely stuffed the stat-sheet at the D-III level. Both figure to get plenty of run behind Zachman and Brown. But which player looks more dynamic? Who appears to be adjusting to Big Ten competition better? Where in the alignment does either player line up? These will be critical questions to answer this spring and into fall camp.
_________________________________________________
*Chat about this article in The Badgers’ Den
*Check out our videos, interviews, and Q&As on our YouTube channel
*Subscribe and listen to the BadgerBlitz.com podcast (as seen on Apple, Google, Spotify and wherever you listen to podcasts)
*Follow us on Twitter: @McNamaraRivals, @TheBadgerNation, @_Perko_, @seamus_rohrer, @DonnieSlusher_
*Like us on Facebook
-
Business1 week ago
Freddie Freeman's World Series walk-off grand slam baseball sells at auction for $1.56 million
-
Technology1 week ago
Meta’s Instagram boss: who posted something matters more in the AI age
-
Technology4 days ago
Google’s counteroffer to the government trying to break it up is unbundling Android apps
-
News5 days ago
Novo Nordisk shares tumble as weight-loss drug trial data disappoints
-
Politics5 days ago
Illegal immigrant sexually abused child in the U.S. after being removed from the country five times
-
Entertainment6 days ago
'It's a little holiday gift': Inside the Weeknd's free Santa Monica show for his biggest fans
-
Politics1 week ago
'Knows how to get things done': Border Patrol union rallies around Noem as DHS chief
-
Lifestyle5 days ago
Think you can't dance? Get up and try these tips in our comic. We dare you!