Connect with us

Midwest

Top DOGE senator to demand lame-duck Biden agencies halt costly telework talks, citing voter mandate

Published

on

Top DOGE senator to demand lame-duck Biden agencies halt costly telework talks, citing voter mandate

The Senate’s top DOGE Republican will send 24 letters – one to each major federal agency head – demanding a halt to last-minute work-from-home negotiations before President Biden returns to Delaware.

Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, chair of the Senate GOP Policy Committee, made the demand days after crafting legislation for 2025 that would “decentralize” and relocate one-third of the federal workforce outside Washington, D.C.

That bill’s lengthy acronym spells out “DRAIN THE SWAMP Act.”

Ernst said that not a single government agency’s office space is half-occupied two-plus years on from the COVID-19 pandemic, and she previously called for the Biden administration to sell off unused real estate for taxpayers’ benefit.

DOGE CAUCUS LEADER ERNST EYES RELOCATION OUT OF DC FOR ONE-THIRD OF FEDERAL WORKERS

Advertisement

In her letters, Ernst laid out that 90% of telework-eligible federal employees are still working from home and only 6% report they are working on a “full-time basis.” 

Additionally, she wrote that public-sector unions are purportedly “dictating personnel policy” without regard to federal directives from the Office of Management & Budget (OMB), which is running up a massive tab and leading to wastes of time, space and money.

“The union bosses are rushing to lock in last minute, lavish long-term deals with the lame-duck Biden administration—extending beyond President Trump’s next term in office—guaranteeing that bureaucrats can stay at home for another four years or longer,” Ernst wrote in one letter prepped for Office of Personnel Management director Robert Shriver III.

“Apparently, protecting telework perks for public employees is a higher priority than showing up to serve American taxpayers,” she wrote, calling Biden’s submission to union demands “shocking and unacceptable.”

She noted it was a similarly liberal president who vociferously opposed unionization of public employees in the first place, as Democrat Franklin Roosevelt wrote in a letter to a union steward declining a 1937 invitation to a national federal employee union convention.

Advertisement

“All government employees should realize that the process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service,” Roosevelt said.

TOP DOGE SENATOR DEMANDS ANSWERS ON PLAN TO EXHAUST CHIPS ACT FUNDS BEFORE TRUMP ARRIVES

Fox News Digital previewed the DOGE Caucus’s new logo along with an email hotline for Americans to send suggestions on government efficiency. (Fox News Digital)

“It has its distinct and insurmountable limitations when applied to public personnel management. The very nature and purposes of government make it impossible for administrative officials to represent fully or to bind the employer in mutual discussions with government employee organizations.”

“The employer is the whole people, who speak by means of laws enacted by their representatives in Congress.”

Advertisement

Ernst suggested federal workers and their union representatives have forgotten Roosevelt’s warning, citing the last-minute push to ratify collective bargaining agreements and telework privilege pacts before President-elect Donald Trump can begin his oversight endeavors through DOGE.

The lawmaker told Fox News Digital on Thursday that her report cited in the letters “exposed that telework abuse is so rampant in Washington that there are more reindeer on Santa’s sleigh than employees showing up at the Department of Energy headquarters.”

“As if that was not bad enough, President Biden is working hand in hand with unions to help ink more last-minute contracts allowing for telework privileges for years. Bureaucrats have forgotten their job is to serve the public, and I am happy to remind them with a little Christmas cheer.”

In the letter, Ernst pointed out situations she said show union bosses and career agency management have the “government wrapped around their finger.”

In the letters, she embedded a photo of former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley while he was serving as Biden’s Social Security Administration chief and who was wearing a Captain America T-shirt alongside a purported union official at a party.

Advertisement

Ernst cited news reports of O’Malley going to Florida to party with union members before endorsing a contract preventing easy reduction of work-from-home ability.

She said O’Malley spent the trip “crooning” Irish ballads on his guitar and drinking alcohol.

“This buddy-buddy relationship between the Social Security Commissioner and the union bosses representing his workforce during what is supposed to be a negotiation resulted in a contract unbelievably slanted towards the union and against the interests of taxpayers and the mission of the agency,” she said.

In another case, she pointed to Housing & Urban Development employees who may not have deserved the TFUT or “taxpayer-funded union time” they filed for.

Advertisement

Former Baltimore mayor and ex-Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley (Reuters)

One such worker successfully claimed compensation while in jail.

Ernst demanded the agencies report data on TFUT claims and payouts, unused or underused real estate holdings designated for use through collective bargaining, and any cases of each agency permitting unions or their employees to use department property at a discount or for free.

“Giving bureaucrats another four-year vacation from the office is unacceptable. Bureaucrats have had enough gap years—it’s time to get them back to work,” she said.

Fox News’ Julia Johnson contributed to this report.

Advertisement

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Milwaukee, WI

Preparing for move, museum has already packed more than 600,000 items

Published

on

Preparing for move, museum has already packed more than 600,000 items


play

The Milwaukee Public Museum has now packed 600,000 items from its collection of 4 million as the staff prepares to move them into their new home: The Nature & Culture Museum of Wisconsin at 1310 N. 6th St.

The staff could still be working through 2027 to move the remaining items, said Collections Move Project Manager Sara Podejko on June 24.

Advertisement

“We will continue packing here even after the future museum opens,” Podejko said.

According to the museum’s June report to the County Board’s committee on parks and culture, construction continues to move along on track, and the new site is expected to open mid-way through 2027.

About half of the total collection has already been inventoried, a painstaking process that has given the museum the opportunity to streamline its electronic storage system.

“There’s been a lot of work ongoing in the collections departments prior to digitize their material, but not everything was. And so, a real upside to this move is that we are able to not only inventory, but barcode all of our specimens,” Podejko said.

Advertisement

That barcode allows collection move technicians to easily input items into an inventory spreadsheet and immediately relocate them.

“It kind of eliminates some human error, which is really important when you’re dealing with four million things,” Podejko said.

Twenty-nine staff members are facilitating the move, including the technicians who were hired and trained specifically to move the artifacts.

Advertisement

“Every time they pack an object, they first assess it for its condition, weaknesses, areas of stability, and then they adapt the pack to that object itself,” Podejko said.

Many of the technicians are also recent graduates and early professionals looking to break into the museum collections scene.

“Collections can be difficult to get into and a job like this kind of gives them (a) foot in the door,” Podejko said.

Advertisement

The public museum’s current facility has continued to face structural challenges amid the move. In January, a passenger elevator failed and was out of service for two months. The only elevator was a small one for wheelchairs, which led to wait times as long as 30 minutes. During that time, an escalator was also taken out of service for repairs.

The museum’s 350-ton water-cooled chiller is also close to failure and needs bearing replacement to keep it functioning throughout the summer.



Source link

Continue Reading

Minneapolis, MN

MN weather: Pleasant Thursday before major heat arrives

Published

on

MN weather: Pleasant Thursday before major heat arrives


Sunshine and comfortable temperatures return Thursday before a weekend warm-up sends highs into the 90s. Heat index values could reach the triple digits early next week. FOX 9 meteorologist Jared Piepenburg has the forecast.

Posted 

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Indianapolis, IN

Hogsett’s former chief of staff quickly took job at major city contractor

Published

on

Hogsett’s former chief of staff quickly took job at major city contractor


This article was produced as part of a series that focuses on ethical concerns within Mayor Joe Hogsett’s administration. It was reported in a collaboration between Mirror Indy and IndyStar and is not available for republication in other media. For questions, see Mirror Indy’s content republishing guidelines.

Indianapolis Mayor Joe Hogsett’s former top deputy in city government is now working at an engineering firm run by major Hogsett donors that has received contracts worth up to $62 million since the mayor took office.

The top Hogsett official, former chief of staff Dan Parker, signed many of those contracts himself while he led the Department of Public Works from 2017 to 2022.

Parker’s move to American Structurepoint, about a month after leaving his job as Hogsett’s No. 2 at the end of 2025, comes as one of the company’s contracts with the city is facing scrutiny for being too expensive.

Advertisement

An analysis by IndyStar and Mirror Indy found the Indianapolis-based firm’s tens of millions of dollars worth of deals make it one of the largest city contractors over the past decade.

Meanwhile, the company’s political action committee and two of its executives, President Cash Canfield and Senior Executive Vice President Greg Henneke, are major donors to Hogsett. Collectively since 2014, about $368,000 in campaign donations have come from those executives, one of their spouses and a political action committee run by Structurepoint.

Multiple ethics experts said Parker’s move to Structurepoint raises questions about potential conflicts of interest.

Jeff Hauser, founder of the national ethics watchdog group the Revolving Door Project, said it’s “definitely concerning” that Parker began working for a top city contractor and major donors to the mayor shortly after leaving his high-profile role as a public servant.

“There is a concern about how he might have been behaving in anticipation of leaving government service,” Hauser said. He compared it to dating: “If you are planning to ask somebody out in the future, that could impact your behavior before you actually ask them out.”

Advertisement

It’s unclear whether Parker is working on city-related matters for Structurepoint. Neither the company, nor Parker, responded to repeated emails, calls and questions sent by IndyStar/Mirror Indy. Parker said “no comment” twice when approached by a reporter at an Indy Chamber event on June 23 before walking away.

A new IndyStar/Mirror Indy investigation has also raised ethical questions surrounding Parker’s role in how city contracts were awarded. The reporting found Hogsett’s campaign fundraiser arranged for donors’ project wish lists to be hand-delivered to Parker when he led DPW. Within months, some of the firms received contracts included on the wish lists. The deals, approved by the city’s Board of Public Works, were signed by Parker.

If Parker’s working on city contracts at Structurepoint, his public-sector experience could give the company an unfair advantage, said Danielle Caputo, senior legal counsel for ethics at the Washington, D.C.-based Campaign Legal Center.

Because Parker — a longtime Hogsett ally and former Indiana Democratic Party chairman — understands the inner workings of the Hogsett administration, he could know how to appeal to decision-makers with whom he recently had close professional relationships, Caputo said. In at least one major city, San Francisco, even communication between the city and Parker at this juncture would be forbidden to prevent favoritism.

“You don’t want a contract to be accepted just because the deputy mayor … is best friends or was close work confidants with the person who’s now choosing where the contract goes,” Caputo said. “That’s not how the government works and that’s not what’s in the best interest of the public.”

Advertisement

City lacks some revolving door guardrails

It’s not uncommon for elected officials and past government employees to accept lucrative roles in the private sector, experts noted. But many experts recommend cooling-off periods that prohibit former public officials and employees from quickly cashing in on their experience in private-sector roles with government contractors.

The city’s ethics code doesn’t require employees to wait to take a job with companies they oversaw or awarded contracts to while in their government role, despite Hogsett campaigning on such an idea in 2015 during his first mayoral bid.

The city’s rules do, however, prevent former employees from working on “particular matters” such as public works projects, economic development deals and other transactions in which they were “personally and substantially” involved.

But city attorneys can waive these ethics restrictions for past employees if their involvement is found not to be “adverse” to the city.

Hogsett spokesperson Aliya Wishner said Parker has not received a waiver, but she didn’t answer several questions about the situation, including when Parker informed the mayor he was applying for a job at Structurepoint and whether he was then shielded from decisions involving the firm. She also did not say whether he’d sought a waiver.

Advertisement

“The city does not control where city employees go after they leave the enterprise and cannot prohibit people from working where they want,” Wishner said in a written statement. “Nothing in the ethics ordinance prohibits former employees generally from earning a living in the private sector following their employment with the city-county, with the exception of activities to lobby the city-county for a period of one year.”

State law is more restrictive than the city’s ordinance. It requires a one-year cooling-off period before state employees can work for or lobby a company if they negotiated or held an administrative role over a contract involving that company while the employee worked for the state. That restriction applies to former state employees, officers and special state appointees, who may seek a waiver from the state ethics commission.

Hauser said the goal of such ethics rules isn’t to stop people from making a living in the private sector. It’s about protecting taxpayers.

“There are many construction and engineering jobs in the world that are not connected to government service,” Hauser said. “The question is whether this person should be involved in a firm that is so focused on public contracting.”

It’s not the first time former Hogsett administration workers have quickly gone on to work for city contractors.

Advertisement

IndyStar and Mirror Indy previously reported that Hogsett’s first chief of staff, Thomas Cook, did not seek a waiver after leaving the city in 2020. He went to work for a Hogsett-connected law firm, Bose McKinney & Evans, where he helped the firm’s developer clients secure millions of dollars worth of city incentives.

Past reporting from the news outlets also showed attorneys for Hogsett went on to work for law firms that do business with the city, where they then performed similar work under contract. The city previously said, in those cases, that the attorneys were either granted waivers or that the legal work they did after they left city employment was different enough as to not trigger the ethics ordinance.

Related

Mr. Clean

Mirror Indy and IndyStar investigate ethical concerns within Mayor Joe Hogsett’s administration.


Advertisement

‘Astronomical’

Parker’s move to the company comes as one of the city’s contracts with Structurepoint has drawn scrutiny.

The broad contract for stormwater consulting services will pay American Structurepoint up to $14.1 million over nearly four years, with most contractors earning hourly wages in the $100 to $300 range.

The latest amendment to the Structurepoint contract was signed in late 2025 when Parker was Hogsett’s chief of staff, roughly a month before he started working for Structurepoint. It’s unclear what, if any, role he played in its negotiation.

For consulting services, DPW puts out a “request for qualifications” to firms in the industry, according to the agency. Department leaders choose a company based on a variety of factors. Then those contracts must be approved by the Board of Public Works, an entity made up of City-County Council and mayoral appointees, and signed by the DPW director.

Advertisement

The contract’s price tag caught the attention of Susie Cordi, a Board of Public Works member who has previously campaigned for Hogsett.

Cordi called the cost “astronomical” in a November 2025 meeting where she urged DPW leaders to fill vacant positions. She lamented that the city was paying higher hourly rates to private contractors instead of more cost-effective wages to DPW employees.

The city defended the contract. Current DPW Director Todd Wilson, who worked for American Structurepoint from 2007 to 2013, told IndyStar/Mirror Indy that the city lacks staffers to perform all the needed work.

Specialized employees like engineers can earn higher salaries in the private sector. He said DPW is working to boost recruiting and increase city salaries to better compete and rely less on contractors going forward.

“But I don’t see in any world where we would completely eliminate staff augmentation from our program,” Wilson said.

Advertisement

DPW spokesperson Kyle Bloyd said the agency’s extensive contracts with Structurepoint and other companies are crucial to the timely execution of DPW’s five-year infrastructure improvement plan worth about $1 billion.

Still, Cordi called the contracts “money in Structurepoint’s pocket” in an IndyStar/Mirror Indy interview.

“We’re understaffed,” she said, “and now Structurepoint is reaping all these benefits from us not being able to keep our engineers.”

Mirror Indy reporter Peter Blanchard and IndyStar reporter Hayleigh Colombo contributed reporting.

Mirror Indy, a nonprofit newsroom, is funded through grants and donations from individuals, foundations and organizations. Sign up for our free newsletters.

Advertisement

Contact IndyStar Indianapolis City Hall Reporter Jordan Smith at jtsmith@indystar.com. Follow him on X @jordantsmith09.

Emily Hopkins is a senior reporter at Mirror Indy. You can reach them by phone or Signal at 317-790-5268 or email at emily.hopkins@mirrorindy.org. Follow them on most social media @indyemapolis or on Bluesky @emilyhopkins.bsky.social.

Local news delivered straight to your inbox

Mirror Indy’s free newsletters are your daily dose of community-focused news stories.

By clicking Sign Up, you’re confirming that you agree with our Terms of Use.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending