Connect with us

South Dakota

South Dakota’s 24/7 Sobriety program could be rolled out nationwide – South Dakota News Watch

Published

on

South Dakota’s 24/7 Sobriety program could be rolled out nationwide – South Dakota News Watch


A zero-tolerance testing method to decreasing drunken driving and different alcohol-related crimes that began in South Dakota may broaden its attain nationally, regardless of issues from critics that it restricts the constitutional rights of some contributors.

The 24/7 Sobriety program, pioneered by former South Dakota Legal professional Basic Larry Lengthy, requires offenders to undergo twice-a-day breathalyzer checks or distant monitoring as a situation of pre-trial bond or sentencing settlement. Failure to stay sober means the participant is shipped to jail, a no-nonsense doctrine that has coincided with a lower in DUI and different alcohol-related offenses, in line with impartial research.

“That’s why it really works,” Lengthy stated of 24/7 Sobriety, which is utilized in South Dakota, North Dakota and Montana and is in place in 4 different states as pilot applications. “These folks know that in the event that they present up and blow scorching, they’re going to jail.”

South Dakota is a testing floor for lawmakers and coverage analysts in search of to cut back the results of alcohol abuse, which kills greater than 140,000 people nationally annually, in line with the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention, with an annual value of almost $250 billion as a consequence of misplaced work productiveness and well being care bills. Since 24/7 Sobriety began in 2005, there have been greater than 39,000 contributors in South Dakota and almost 12.5 million checks administered, with a go price of 98.8%, in line with the lawyer basic’s workplace.

Advertisement

All however 4 South Dakota counties (Buffalo, Jones, Oglala Lakota and Todd) make the most of this system, which focuses on repeat offenders and is essentially self-funded as a result of the price of testing is handed on to contributors. The unique system, which focused convicted drunken drivers, has expanded to incorporate different instances involving alcohol or medication, together with instances involving abused or uncared for youngsters, and as a stipulation for sustaining a piece allow.

In most counties, the primary time the participant fails a take a look at or doesn’t present up, she or he is jailed for 12 hours, adopted by 24 hours for a second violation and 48 hours for a 3rd. Any additional violations are despatched to a choose, who can revoke bond or the sentencing settlement and put the offender behind bars for an prolonged interval.

The subsequent take a look at for this system is to see if 24/7 Sobriety can catch on nationally. U.S. Rep. Dusty Johnson, R-South Dakota, is co-sponsoring bipartisan laws to supply federal grants for states to undertake the intervention mannequin, whereas additionally encouraging additional research on its results on drug and alcohol rehabilitation.

The SOBER Act (Supporting Alternatives to Construct On a regular basis Duty) would assist defray administrative prices for tools that features not simply breathalyzers but in addition for urinalysis, drug patches, monitoring bracelets and ignition interlock gadgets, which forestall a car from beginning until the driving force passes a breath take a look at.

Johnson famous that these awaiting trial or serving a suspended sentence can keep employment and be with household in the event that they avoid alcohol and medicines, which in lots of instances was an element of their felony conduct. Ideally, psychological well being counseling and different providers are a part of the restoration course of, relatively than anticipating offenders to “clear up” behind bars.

Advertisement

“I’m amazed at how forward of its time South Dakota was,” stated Johnson, who didn’t provide a timetable for when the invoice may attain the Home Judiciary Committee. “Now, most People perceive that one of the best ways to take care of dependancy is just not merely to throw somebody in jail. Therapy and day-to-day accountability must be part of that journey. We’re speaking about that day-after-day in (Washington D.C.) now, however South Dakota was speaking about it many years in the past, and put collectively a fairly sturdy program with fairly good outcomes.”

An officer will get able to administer a breathalyzer take a look at on the Minnehaha County Constructing in 2016. Assessments are given twice a day to these within the 24/7 Sobriety program. Photograph: Courtesy of Argus Chief

Opponents level to civil rights points

Critics declare these outcomes have come at the price of constitutional protections for contributors, a lot of whom are awaiting trial and haven’t been convicted of a criminal offense. There are additionally questions on passing the price of this system on to contributors who won’t be capable to afford it along with having to pay for lawyer charges, fines, obligatory counseling and different prices related to their case.

The breathalyzer checks value $2 a day, whereas costlier choices – distant breath testing for $5 and SCRAM (Safe Steady Distant Alcohol Monitoring) bracelets at $6 a day – enable contributors to keep away from the twice-daily journey to the county jail or sheriff’s workplace for testing.

Advertisement

“That’s a luxurious that a lot of our shoppers can’t afford,” stated Traci Smith, who heads the Minnehaha County Public Defender’s Workplace. Although this system works in some instances to maintain folks out of jail, Smith stated, she’s involved that expanded use of 24/7 Sobriety makes it a catch-all that supersedes extra appropriate types of rehabilitation.

“I do suppose it’s a superb instrument, however I don’t know that it’s a common instrument that ought to exchange every little thing else within the toolbox,” stated Smith, who began as a deputy public defender in 1999. “It’s not the identical as therapy, and I believe generally folks exterior of the therapy world overlook that. Every little thing can’t at all times fall again on the jail or regulation enforcement to repair our issues.”

Smith has seen sufficient instances to know that this system’s optimistic results are sometimes momentary, and generally primarily based on contributors getting across the guidelines.

“What shoppers inform me is that when they get their schedule, they drink simply sufficient to know after they get across the hours they usually don’t get held,” Smith stated. “Relatively than addressing the actual difficulty, which is the trauma behind the dependancy, they’re simply studying to play the sport.”

The American Civil Liberties Union filed a federal lawsuit earlier this yr difficult the 24/7 Sobriety program in Teton County, Wyoming, claiming twice-daily breath checks quantity to “warrantless search” and violate the Fourth Modification. The grievance additionally alleged Eighth Modification violations for extreme bail as a consequence of charges that disproportionately affect indigent contributors.

Advertisement

In April, a district choose denied the movement for a preliminary injunction to quickly halt this system in Teton County, which the ACLU focused as a result of it included first-time defendants relatively than simply repeat offenders. Stephanie Amiotte, the ACLU’s authorized director for South Dakota, North Dakota and Wyoming, stated the 24/7 Sobriety case is “pending and lively” and that her group may pursue comparable lawsuits in different states.

“Therapy applications are sometimes the very best indicator of whether or not someone goes to have a relapse or whether or not they’re going to contribute to their sobriety,” stated Amiotte. “Throwing folks in jail, inflicting them to lose their job, making them pay cash that they don’t have, actually isn’t one of the best ways to impact change when someone has a substance-abuse difficulty.”

Supporters, nonetheless, level to encouraging information from teams such because the RAND Company, a California-based coverage suppose tank, which discovered a discount in DUI arrests and home violence arrests in states that adopted the mannequin.

A 2020 research by the Journal of Coverage Evaluation and Administration revealed by RAND discovered that the likelihood of a 24/7 participant being re-arrested or having probation revoked inside 12 months of being arrested for DUI was almost 50 % decrease than that of non-participants.

“These findings present help for ‘swift-certain-fair’ approaches to making use of sanctions in neighborhood supervision,” the research’s authors concluded. “Additionally they present policymakers with proof for a brand new method to cut back felony exercise amongst these whose alcohol use leads them to repeatedly threaten public well being and security.”

Advertisement
A participant downloads data via an ankle monitor bracelet as a part of the 24/7 Sobriety Program on the Minnehaha County Constructing. Photograph: Courtesy of Argus Chief

Imaginative and prescient for brand new method takes form

Larry Lengthy grew up in Bennett County and spent 18 years as a prosecutor there within the Nineteen Seventies and 80s, coping with a gradual tide of alcohol-related infractions, many involving repeat offenders.

These caught ingesting whereas out on bond confronted penalties corresponding to shedding their driver’s license, their car or getting into obligatory therapy, however that failed to discourage probably the most persistent abusers of alcohol from touchdown again in custody.

“The sheriff and I had been sitting round someday making an attempt to determine how we are able to make some room in our jail,” Lengthy advised Information Watch. “We come across the concept of testing folks twice a day to implement one customary rule, which is you don’t drink when you’re out on bond. The jail was throughout from the sheriff’s workplace, so we’d march them actually throughout the corridor and put them behind bars.”

Lengthy likened the expertise to touching an electrical fence: “You by no means contact it purposefully a second time,” he stated. “What we found was that we may hold hardcore drinkers sober for 2 to 3 months at a time, permitting for higher habits to take maintain.”

Advertisement

Larry Lengthy

He moved to Pierre to develop into deputy lawyer basic below Mark Barnett in 1991 and took the Legal professional Basic place in 2003, with fellow Republican Mike Rounds as governor. When Rounds shaped a corrections working group to take care of rising incarceration charges, Lengthy noticed an opportunity to check the 24/7 Sobriety program with a broader scope. In 2005, he launched the idea as a pilot program in three counties – Minnehaha, Pennington and Tripp – to see if the success in Bennett County may translate statewide.

Byron Nogelmeier, now the state 24/7 Sobriety coordinator, served as Turner County Sheriff on the time and recalled being skeptical of Lengthy’s imaginative and prescient.

“He got here to a convention of the South Dakota Sheriffs’ Affiliation and introduced it to the desk, explaining the way it had labored in Bennett County,” stated Nogelmeier. “Most of us walked out of there, pondering, ‘Wow, how’s this going to work?’ However the extra data he fed us and the extra we noticed of the pilot program, the extra we turned believers.”

Lengthy enlisted Invoice Mickelson of the South Dakota Freeway Patrol to run this system, which concerned elevating cash for tools and compiling information on alcohol-related convictions. The Nationwide Freeway Site visitors Security Administration discovered that South Dakota visitors fatalities involving alcohol impairment dropped from 71 in 2004 to 34 in 2008.

Advertisement

By then, the Legislature had handed a regulation to supply this system statewide, offering $350,000 in state funds in 2007 and $400,000 in 2008 to focus on persistent drunken drivers who ignored pre-trial provisions and consumed alcohol whereas out on bond. Prices for this system had been quickly handed on to contributors, and counties got the choice of implementing the system.

“We restricted it to (second offense) DUIs or larger, specializing in individuals who had been arrested for DUI and had a previous conviction inside 10 years,” stated Lengthy. “Judges began to see what we had seen in Bennett County, and increasingly of them bought on board.”

David Whitesock, proven on this 2006 picture taking a breathalyzer take a look at, was examined twice a day for 947 days after receiving his fifth DUI. He now runs his personal enterprise helping in dependancy restoration. Photograph: Courtesy of Argus Chief

‘It most likely saved my life’

By the point David Whitesock moved from North Dakota to South Dakota and began working at a Winner radio station in 2005, he already had 4 DUI arrests, three failed faculty stints, an eviction from his residence and a pink slip from his final job. He struggled with nervousness and despair that fueled his dependancy to alcohol.

When he picked up his fifth drunken driving arrest three months after arriving in Winner, he anticipated to put up bail like he had previously and present up for his subsequent look.

Advertisement

“They stated, ‘No, now we have a brand new plan right here,’” Whitesock advised Information Watch. “They advised me that I may go away once I blew zero and so long as I continued to blow zero two occasions a day, I may hold working till I used to be sentenced. That type of opened my eyes.”

For 3 months, whereas working as a broadcaster, he would head to the police station, which was proper throughout the alley from the radio station at 7 a.m. and seven p.m. to blow right into a tube.

“I’d placed on a six-minute tune, one thing by Led Zeppelin, run out the again door and the (officers) knew I used to be coming,” he stated. The one time he forgot, he tried to speak his manner out of it however was thrown behind bars till his sentencing date.

When that day arrived, in September of 2005, he entered the Tripp County courtroom of Decide Kathleen Trandahl carrying an orange jumpsuit, feeling out of kinds and out of possibilities.

“I’ll always remember that day,” stated Trandahl, who retired as a choose in 2016. “He appeared like a tomcat that had been pulled behind a pickup for 2 weeks. He was markedly in hassle, simply by taking a look at him.”

Advertisement

Trandahl was accustomed to the 24/7 Sobriety Program as a result of her circuit included Bennett County, and he or she had lobbied to develop into a part of Lengthy’s pilot program. She noticed the zero-tolerance doctrine as well-suited for Whitesock, who regardless of his struggles had sturdy household help and was educated sufficient to know the burden of the courtroom’s expectations.

“It was manifestly apparent that the felony justice system had failed him in North Dakota,” stated Trandahl, noting that the state didn’t have 24/7 Sobriety at the moment. “He had by some means managed to amass 4 DUI convictions, plus different crimes, and had been out and in of jail. And but with all of that, he had by no means been to therapy, he had by no means been on probation, and there had been no courtroom supervision. He was provided no assist in any way, and I simply felt that he was owed that chance by the courtroom.”

She handed Whitesock a 5-year sentence of supervised probation and two years of jail suspended. He acquired in-patient therapy on the Human Companies Middle in Yankton for 147 days till he discovered a spot at a sober home in Sioux Falls that the choose signed off on, inside the framework of the 24/7 Sobriety system.

For the subsequent 947 days, he rode his bike twice a day to the Minnehaha County Constructing for his breath checks whereas working a job and attending 12-step conferences. Because the toxins left his physique and his head cleared, he charted a path to enroll on the College of South Dakota with the choose’s blessing.

“Whenever you rise up each morning at 6 a.m. and experience 26 blocks, then experience your bike again and do the identical over once more that evening, it creates a sure degree of self-discipline,” stated Whitesock. “That construction, given what my life was like earlier than, was a game-changer for me.”

Advertisement

He met his future spouse at USD and labored his manner into regulation college, weaning himself off 24/7 Sobriety right into a extra standard type of probation. On Aug. 3, 2013, alongside along with his household, he returned to the courtroom in Winner, this time for his Oath of Legal professional after passing the bar, and Trandahl administered the oath.

He labored as a knowledge analyst for Face It Collectively, a Sioux Falls nonprofit that works to fight drug and alcohol dependancy, and in 2020 based his personal New York-based firm utilizing information surveys to “measure wellbeing and high quality of life relative to the results of dependancy.

David Whitesock

Whitesock sees 24/7 Sobriety as a shock to the system however not the one reply for persistent offenders. He and Trandahl each admit that 947 days of twice-daily checks turned an excessive amount of of a crutch, and he wanted to check his sobriety whereas nonetheless having the security web of probation and random checks.

However Whitesock additionally considers it a accident that he occurred to be in one of many counties that was a part of Larry Lengthy’s pilot program when his fifth DUI occurred after shifting to Winner from North Dakota.

Advertisement

“Tripp County turned a part of this system due to Decide Trandahl in February of 2005, and I confirmed up in June,” he stated. “It was within the two largest counties in South Dakota after which one little county, squished between Native American reservations, and that’s the place I ended up, after a decade of private destruction. It most likely saved my life.”

In South Dakota, the 24/7 Sobriety program requires offenders to undergo twice-a-day breathalyzer checks or distant monitoring as a situation of pre-trial bond or sentence settlement. Photograph: Courtesy of Argus Chief

Completely different paths to attaining sobriety

Rep. Johnson helps South Dakota’s 24/7 Sobriety mannequin however concedes that different states may want to seek out different methods to implement this system The SOBER Act would supply $250 million to states over 5 years to “create, maintain and develop” their applications and collect information, with a typical aim of avoiding crowded jails and reducing the quantity recidivism with DUIs and different offenses.

“I’ve bought fairly sturdy opinions on this difficulty, however I don’t suppose all the knowledge resides in D.C.,” stated Johnson. “So relatively than impose my opinion on the states, we needed to provide them the flexibleness to chart their very own course. Perhaps we’ll all do it a bunch of various methods and we’ll be capable to study which is greatest via time and information.”

Johnson’s invoice is supported by the Nationwide Sheriffs’ Affiliation and the Niskanen Middle, a Libertarian-leaning suppose tank in Washington. However different teams have been a harder promote. MADD (Moms Towards Drunk Driving) has criticized the 24/7 Sobriety system for focusing not on simply impaired driving however alcoholism generally, which they contemplate too broad a scope.

Advertisement

 

“Their focus is totally different,” stated Lengthy, who served two phrases as lawyer basic and later turned a circuit courtroom choose earlier than retiring in 2018. “Their major instrument is the interlock machine that’s designed to stop a drunk particular person from driving a automobile. Our aim is totally different. We would like this particular person to give up ingesting so he’s now not within the felony justice system at any degree. We don’t need him to drive a automobile drunk, we don’t wish to him to beat his spouse, we don’t him to abuse his children, we don’t need him to pee on the sidewalk, we don’t wish to should appoint a lawyer for him, and we don’t wish to have to select a jury for him. That’s our focus, and it’s cheaper.”

Along with the states which have adopted 24/7 Sobriety statewide, there are pilot applications both applied or approved in Alaska, Florida, Idaho, Nebraska, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming.

The Wyoming Legislature handed a 24/7 Sobriety regulation in 2014 however sparked controversy with a 2019 modification that broadened the scope of this system to incorporate first-time offenders, which made the breath checks “each day warrantless searches,” in line with the ACLU.

A district choose dismissed a few of the ACLU’s arguments in denying the movement for a preliminary injunction, writing in his opinion that the plaintiffs “have thrown a lot due-process spaghetti on the wall on this continuing, and none of it has caught.”

Advertisement

What occurs subsequent with that case might be watched intently as Johnson builds help for his invoice and tries to get it to the Home ground, which could develop into extra sensible after the November mid-term elections. What began as an outside-the-box experiment in Bennett County may acquire a nationwide foothold if the GOP retakes the bulk.

“There’s been a little bit of a metamorphosis in pondering, notably amongst Republicans,” stated Johnson. “Thirty years in the past, the dominant thought amongst Republican policymakers was that the severity of the punishment was sufficient to discourage crime. We now know that it’s the understanding and swiftness of sanctions that change conduct, and this can be a optimistic step.”

Have data so as to add to this story? Contact us.

Advertisement

About Stu Whitney

Stu Whitney is an investigative reporter for South Dakota Information Watch. A resident of Sioux Falls, Whitney is an award-winning reporter, editor and novelist with greater than 30 years of expertise in journalism.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

South Dakota

South Dakota Childcare Task Force report says funding is needed

Published

on

South Dakota Childcare Task Force report says funding is needed


SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (Dakota News Now) – A new report from the South Dakota Childcare Task Force, along with additional research from the Hunt Institute, revealed the difficulties of finding and paying for childcare in South Dakota.

Over seventy percent of young children in South Dakota have all parents working. With weekly costs for a toddler being as much as $260 per week, affording childcare expenses can be difficult.

Adding to the burden is finding daycare for your children.

Senator Tim Reed believes a higher wage for childcare workers will allow centers to open existing rooms they already have.

Advertisement

“We need to be able to increase what we’re paying at the childcare assistance level and I think it’s going to have to increase in other levels too, but we need to start there,” Sen. Reed said.

There are communities that have demonstrated how working together can solve the problem. The focus of the future: Braided funding.

“Tri share is three entities that are helping to cover child care for the family. The parent has a part of it. The employer has part of it and then some other funding source has part of it and in most states that other funding is coming from the state. What’s really unique about the program in Rapid City is that it’s coming from philanthropic funds,” said South Dakota Association for the Education of Young Children executive director Janessa Bixel.

The Black Hills Area Community Foundation is funding a portion of a childcare program in Rapid City.

In Madison, TIF funding is helping the launch of a new childcare center. Could more state funding happen in South Dakota?

Advertisement

“And the budget cuts, obviously that makes some of the items that we want to do tougher to get done because they all do cost money. And so, I mean, we’re going to have to work on that, you know, and promote how important this is. We just. To talk through all of the possibilities of where we can fund this,” Sen. Reed said.

Reed said the lack of affordable childcare is costing South Dakota $329 million each year.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South Dakota

South Dakota attorney general unveils package of new laws for 2025 legislative session

Published

on

South Dakota attorney general unveils package of new laws for 2025 legislative session


play

South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley hopes to prevent and catch future criminal conduct by state employees with new reporting requirements, protections for whistleblowers and a bigger role for the state auditor, according to a package of legislation he released Tuesday.

Advertisement

Jackley unveiled seven bills for lawmakers to consider during the annual legislative session that kicks off next Tuesday at the Capitol in Pierre.

Jackley’s bills focus on government accountability, human trafficking, prison contraband and probation.

Government accountability

Jackley’s government accountability measures come in response to several prosecutions he began last year against former state employees.

Those cases include allegations of former Department of Revenue employees creating fake vehicle titles to secure loans and avoid excise taxes, a former Department of Social Services employee allegedly embezzling $1.8 million, and a former Department of Public Safety employee allegedly filing fake food-service health inspection records for inspections that were never conducted.

Advertisement

“Protecting taxpayer dollars and restoring the public’s trust in government should be given high priority,” Jackley said Tuesday in a press release.

One of his proposed measures would require state employees in supervisory roles to report suspected unlawful conduct to the attorney general and state auditor. Failure to report suspected violations would be classified as a felony.

Additionally, the attorney general would be required to submit an annual report to lawmakers on the state budget committee outlining the number and outcomes of misconduct reports received.

Another bill seeks to shield state employees from retaliation for reporting misconduct or participating in audits and investigations. The bill would:

Advertisement
  • Prohibit state supervisors from discharging, discriminating against or taking any other retaliatory action against whistleblowers.
  • Establish a process allowing state employees to file complaints with the attorney general within two years after experiencing retaliation.
  • Authorize courts to reinstate employees and award back pay if they suffered illegal retaliation.

A third measure would authorize the state auditor to access all financial records of every state agency to conduct audits, investigate improper conduct and ensure internal controls are in place and maintained.

The fourth bill proposes state agencies conduct mandatory annual risk reviews, with results submitted to the Board of Internal Control. The reviews would assess agencies’ risk management practices and identify vulnerabilities.

Human trafficking

Another proposal would revise human trafficking laws and prohibit the obstruction of their enforcement.

“Human trafficking remains a national concern that we are not immune from, and this legislation strengthens victim protections and enhances our ability to hold offenders accountable,” Jackley said.

The bill would update the definitions of human trafficking in the first degree and second degree and would:

Advertisement
  • Establish mandatory minimum prison sentences of 15 years for a first offense and 20 years for a second or subsequent offense of human trafficking in the first degree.
  • Establish mandatory minimum prison sentences of five years for a first offense and 10 years for a second or subsequent offense of human trafficking in the second degree.
  • Create the new felony crime of obstructing the enforcement of human trafficking laws.

Prison contraband

Jackley’s legislative package also includes measures dealing with contraband in state correctional facilities. Officials with the state Department of Corrections reported finding contraband during a lockdown last year at the penitentiary in Sioux Falls.

Existing laws prohibit inmates from possessing drugs, unapproved prescription drugs, alcohol and weapons. Among other provisions, the proposed legislation would add unapproved cell phones and electronic communication devices to the list of banned items, clarify that employees and other people are prohibited from giving a similar list of items to inmates, and adjust the severity of various penalties for the different types of contraband.

Presumptive probation

Another proposal addresses South Dakota’s presumptive probation system, which mandates that some non-violent offenders receive probation instead of prison time. Jackley’s bill would make re-offenders who were already on probation or parole supervision ineligible for presumptive probation. 

The bill also adds those convicted of threatening public officials or fleeing law enforcement to the list of ineligible offenders, as well as sex offenders who violate safety zones.

“Sentencing courts need more flexibility to impose appropriate sentences for certain violent offenders, and those choosing to reoffend while on probation or parole,” Jackley said.

Advertisement

South Dakota Searchlight is part of States Newsroom, the nation’s largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.



Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

Landowners appeal Summit carbon storage decision • South Dakota Searchlight

Published

on

Landowners appeal Summit carbon storage decision • South Dakota Searchlight


A group of North Dakota landowners is appealing the state’s approval of an underground carbon storage area for Summit Carbon Solutions, the company attempting to build the world’s largest carbon capture and storage project.

The group represented by Bismarck attorney Derrick Braaten on Thursday filed the appeal in Burleigh County District Court, asserting that the North Dakota Industrial Commission withheld information and violated state law in approving the storage permit plan on Dec. 12.

The permanent underground carbon storage sites in western North Dakota are a key piece of Summit’s planned five-state pipeline network (including South Dakota) capturing greenhouse gas emissions from ethanol plants. Approving the storage wells was one of the last decisions of Gov. Doug Burgum as chair of the Industrial Commission, which also included Attorney General Drew Wrigley and Agriculture Commissioner Doug Goehring.

State schedules public input meetings on Summit carbon pipeline application

Advertisement

The unanimous vote by the commission means that landowners who had not signed an agreement with Summit will be forced to allow the carbon storage on their property.

The landowners assert that the Industrial Commission, which includes the state Department of Mineral Resources, illegally refused to disclose information to landowners under North Dakota open records laws. Braaten and his clients were seeking computer-generated models that predict where the carbon dioxide will go when it is pumped underground for permanent storage.

The appeal says former Department of Mineral Resources Director Lynn Helms refused to provide the models before, during and after public hearings on the case in June, shortly before Helms retired.

The order passed by the Industrial Commission said that if any open records requests were not fulfilled, it is because the Braaten Law Firm did not inform the agency that it had not received the records.

“That’s a lie,” Braaten told the North Dakota Monitor.

Advertisement

The appeal said Braaten’s firm was able to obtain the records in November. Braaten contends the computer models aren’t accurate but landowners were not given a chance to dispute that. He said multiple requests for a rehearing were ignored.

Another issue raised in the appeal are the state’s rules on underground storage. Under a process called amalgamation, if 60% of the landowners in a proposed storage area agree to the plan, the state can force the other 40% to comply.

Summit has obtained more than 92% of the pore space lease agreements across all three areas, according to the order approved in December.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

Advertisement

After the commission’s Dec. 12 decision, Summit Executive Vice President Wade Boeshans said the permits resulted from “years of rigorous scientific study, engineering design, and input from regulators, landowners, and local leaders.”

Braaten also is representing the Northwest Landowners Association that has a separate lawsuit before the North Dakota Supreme Court on the amalgamation issue that he contends is unconstitutional.

Advertisement

He said a ruling on either that lawsuit or the storage decision appeal should clarify the constitutionality of the rules.

Braaten’s law firm also is representing Emmons County in a separate legal challenge to the state Public Service Commission’s approval of the pipeline route through North Dakota. Emmons County and Burleigh County are challenging the PSC’s interpretation of state law that concluded state zoning rules preempt local ordinances on where pipelines are allowed.

Another group of landowners also is appealing the PSC permit decision.

Braaten said those appeals may be combined into one case.

This story was originally published by the North Dakota Monitor. Like South Dakota Searchlight, it’s part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. North Dakota Monitor maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Amy Dalrymple for questions: [email protected].
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending