Connect with us

South Dakota

South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem declines debate, claims public broadcaster slants left

Published

on

South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem declines debate, claims public broadcaster slants left


NEWNow you can hearken to Fox Information articles!

Gov. Kristi Noem received’t take part in a debate sponsored by South Dakota Public Broadcasting due to what her marketing campaign spokesman known as its “excessive leftward swing.”

In a break from precedent, the Republican governor has agreed to only one debate together with her challenger, Democratic state Rep. Jamie Smith.

Noem, who has additionally positioned herself for a 2024 White Home bid, is following a nationwide development of candidates — usually Republicans — who’re abandoning the time-honored custom of debating their rivals earlier than Election Day. For Noem, the snub was one other alternative to slam a media ecosystem that conservatives discover elitist and solid herself within the mould of former President Donald Trump.

Advertisement

“Up to now, Governor Noem has made clear that she is not going to take part in debates hosted by hyper-partisan organizations or shops. SDPB has repeatedly promoted the novel effort to re-write American historical past and cancel our Founding Fathers,” Ian Fury, a spokesman for Noem’s marketing campaign, mentioned in an announcement Friday.

GOV. KRISTI NOEM RECALLS HER FAITH, FAMILY AND FARMING ROOTS IN MEMOIR ABOUT HER POLITICAL RISE

He added that South Dakota Public Broadcasting’s “excessive leftward swing precludes the opportunity of a good debate.”

SD Gov. Kristi Noem is not going to take part in a debate due to the leftward leaning nature of the competition. 
(Brandon Bell/Getty Photos)

The assertion pointed to South Dakota Public Broadcasting’s interview final 12 months with award-winning scholar and creator Ibrahim X. Kendi wherein he criticized Noem’s efforts to bar public colleges and universities from utilizing sure approaches to educating about race. Noem beforehand singled out Kendi’s work in an govt order.

Advertisement

GOV. KRISTI NOEM ASKED IF SOUTH DAKOTA WILL FORCE A ten-YEAR-OLD TO HAVE A BABY ON CNN’S ‘STATE OF THE UNION’

A part of South Dakota Public Broadcasting’s mission is to supply “entry to democracy” by means of its broadcasts and protection of Statehouse debates and motion. It’s a state company that operates below the Bureau of Info and Telecommunication, with $9 million in public funds and extra cash raised by means of a nonprofit.

The company didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.

Noem’s marketing campaign mentioned South Dakota Public Broadcasting had inquired why she wouldn’t take part in its debate, as she did in the course of the 2018 election cycle.

EXCLUSIVE: GOV. KRISTI NOEM ON FIGHTING WOKE POLITICS OVER JULY 4TH FIREWORKS AT MT. RUSHMORE

Advertisement

Noem’s gubernatorial challenger, Smith, mentioned, “That is simply one other instance of her making an attempt to push the narrative in a hyper-partisan method. Right here once more, she’s selecting to not debate on a platform that the South Dakota individuals have come to belief, and that’s a detriment to the individuals of South Dakota.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

South Dakota

South Dakota attorney general unveils package of new laws for 2025 legislative session

Published

on

South Dakota attorney general unveils package of new laws for 2025 legislative session


play

South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley hopes to prevent and catch future criminal conduct by state employees with new reporting requirements, protections for whistleblowers and a bigger role for the state auditor, according to a package of legislation he released Tuesday.

Advertisement

Jackley unveiled seven bills for lawmakers to consider during the annual legislative session that kicks off next Tuesday at the Capitol in Pierre.

Jackley’s bills focus on government accountability, human trafficking, prison contraband and probation.

Government accountability

Jackley’s government accountability measures come in response to several prosecutions he began last year against former state employees.

Those cases include allegations of former Department of Revenue employees creating fake vehicle titles to secure loans and avoid excise taxes, a former Department of Social Services employee allegedly embezzling $1.8 million, and a former Department of Public Safety employee allegedly filing fake food-service health inspection records for inspections that were never conducted.

Advertisement

“Protecting taxpayer dollars and restoring the public’s trust in government should be given high priority,” Jackley said Tuesday in a press release.

One of his proposed measures would require state employees in supervisory roles to report suspected unlawful conduct to the attorney general and state auditor. Failure to report suspected violations would be classified as a felony.

Additionally, the attorney general would be required to submit an annual report to lawmakers on the state budget committee outlining the number and outcomes of misconduct reports received.

Another bill seeks to shield state employees from retaliation for reporting misconduct or participating in audits and investigations. The bill would:

Advertisement
  • Prohibit state supervisors from discharging, discriminating against or taking any other retaliatory action against whistleblowers.
  • Establish a process allowing state employees to file complaints with the attorney general within two years after experiencing retaliation.
  • Authorize courts to reinstate employees and award back pay if they suffered illegal retaliation.

A third measure would authorize the state auditor to access all financial records of every state agency to conduct audits, investigate improper conduct and ensure internal controls are in place and maintained.

The fourth bill proposes state agencies conduct mandatory annual risk reviews, with results submitted to the Board of Internal Control. The reviews would assess agencies’ risk management practices and identify vulnerabilities.

Human trafficking

Another proposal would revise human trafficking laws and prohibit the obstruction of their enforcement.

“Human trafficking remains a national concern that we are not immune from, and this legislation strengthens victim protections and enhances our ability to hold offenders accountable,” Jackley said.

The bill would update the definitions of human trafficking in the first degree and second degree and would:

Advertisement
  • Establish mandatory minimum prison sentences of 15 years for a first offense and 20 years for a second or subsequent offense of human trafficking in the first degree.
  • Establish mandatory minimum prison sentences of five years for a first offense and 10 years for a second or subsequent offense of human trafficking in the second degree.
  • Create the new felony crime of obstructing the enforcement of human trafficking laws.

Prison contraband

Jackley’s legislative package also includes measures dealing with contraband in state correctional facilities. Officials with the state Department of Corrections reported finding contraband during a lockdown last year at the penitentiary in Sioux Falls.

Existing laws prohibit inmates from possessing drugs, unapproved prescription drugs, alcohol and weapons. Among other provisions, the proposed legislation would add unapproved cell phones and electronic communication devices to the list of banned items, clarify that employees and other people are prohibited from giving a similar list of items to inmates, and adjust the severity of various penalties for the different types of contraband.

Presumptive probation

Another proposal addresses South Dakota’s presumptive probation system, which mandates that some non-violent offenders receive probation instead of prison time. Jackley’s bill would make re-offenders who were already on probation or parole supervision ineligible for presumptive probation. 

The bill also adds those convicted of threatening public officials or fleeing law enforcement to the list of ineligible offenders, as well as sex offenders who violate safety zones.

“Sentencing courts need more flexibility to impose appropriate sentences for certain violent offenders, and those choosing to reoffend while on probation or parole,” Jackley said.

Advertisement

South Dakota Searchlight is part of States Newsroom, the nation’s largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.



Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

Landowners appeal Summit carbon storage decision • South Dakota Searchlight

Published

on

Landowners appeal Summit carbon storage decision • South Dakota Searchlight


A group of North Dakota landowners is appealing the state’s approval of an underground carbon storage area for Summit Carbon Solutions, the company attempting to build the world’s largest carbon capture and storage project.

The group represented by Bismarck attorney Derrick Braaten on Thursday filed the appeal in Burleigh County District Court, asserting that the North Dakota Industrial Commission withheld information and violated state law in approving the storage permit plan on Dec. 12.

The permanent underground carbon storage sites in western North Dakota are a key piece of Summit’s planned five-state pipeline network (including South Dakota) capturing greenhouse gas emissions from ethanol plants. Approving the storage wells was one of the last decisions of Gov. Doug Burgum as chair of the Industrial Commission, which also included Attorney General Drew Wrigley and Agriculture Commissioner Doug Goehring.

State schedules public input meetings on Summit carbon pipeline application

Advertisement

The unanimous vote by the commission means that landowners who had not signed an agreement with Summit will be forced to allow the carbon storage on their property.

The landowners assert that the Industrial Commission, which includes the state Department of Mineral Resources, illegally refused to disclose information to landowners under North Dakota open records laws. Braaten and his clients were seeking computer-generated models that predict where the carbon dioxide will go when it is pumped underground for permanent storage.

The appeal says former Department of Mineral Resources Director Lynn Helms refused to provide the models before, during and after public hearings on the case in June, shortly before Helms retired.

The order passed by the Industrial Commission said that if any open records requests were not fulfilled, it is because the Braaten Law Firm did not inform the agency that it had not received the records.

“That’s a lie,” Braaten told the North Dakota Monitor.

Advertisement

The appeal said Braaten’s firm was able to obtain the records in November. Braaten contends the computer models aren’t accurate but landowners were not given a chance to dispute that. He said multiple requests for a rehearing were ignored.

Another issue raised in the appeal are the state’s rules on underground storage. Under a process called amalgamation, if 60% of the landowners in a proposed storage area agree to the plan, the state can force the other 40% to comply.

Summit has obtained more than 92% of the pore space lease agreements across all three areas, according to the order approved in December.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

Advertisement

After the commission’s Dec. 12 decision, Summit Executive Vice President Wade Boeshans said the permits resulted from “years of rigorous scientific study, engineering design, and input from regulators, landowners, and local leaders.”

Braaten also is representing the Northwest Landowners Association that has a separate lawsuit before the North Dakota Supreme Court on the amalgamation issue that he contends is unconstitutional.

Advertisement

He said a ruling on either that lawsuit or the storage decision appeal should clarify the constitutionality of the rules.

Braaten’s law firm also is representing Emmons County in a separate legal challenge to the state Public Service Commission’s approval of the pipeline route through North Dakota. Emmons County and Burleigh County are challenging the PSC’s interpretation of state law that concluded state zoning rules preempt local ordinances on where pipelines are allowed.

Another group of landowners also is appealing the PSC permit decision.

Braaten said those appeals may be combined into one case.

This story was originally published by the North Dakota Monitor. Like South Dakota Searchlight, it’s part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. North Dakota Monitor maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Amy Dalrymple for questions: [email protected].
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

Former South Dakota DSS employee indicted for allegedly stealing voucher to buy groceries

Published

on

Former South Dakota DSS employee indicted for allegedly stealing voucher to buy groceries


A former South Dakota Department of Social Services employee was indicted on one count of social services fraud Thursday, according to a press release from the South Dakota Attorney General’s Office.

Amalia Escalante Barrientos, 28, allegedly used a stolen DSS voucher to purchase groceries for personal use, according to the press release. The incident occurred at a Brookings business Oct. 11.

The Brookings woman has not yet appeared for an initial hearing, according to Minnehaha County court documents.

According to Open SD, Barrientos’ wage is listed at $26.58 hourly.

Advertisement

If convicted, Barrientos could serve up to one year in the county jail, a $2,000 fine, or both, according to the press release.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending