Connect with us

South Dakota

Sioux Falls Black leaders unimpressed with response to neo-Nazi march

Published

on

Sioux Falls Black leaders unimpressed with response to neo-Nazi march


SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (Dakota News Now) – The fallout continues after multiple incidents of a neo-Nazi group marching in South Dakota cities.

Those activities happened over the weekend at the State Capitol in Pierre and in Deadwood.

State leaders have condemned the marches, but the level of response has been underwhelming for three leaders from the Sioux Falls branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP).

Langston Newton, the president of the NAACP in Sioux Falls, had spent his entire Saturday celebrating the diversity of the city while representing the civil rights group in the Sioux Falls Pride Parade and Festival of Cultures.

Advertisement

Then, while at a Levitt at The Falls music show, he received the news about the neo-Nazi march in Pierre.

”Honestly, it was disbelief. To see neo-Nazis in 2024 go to your state capitol is, like, ‘This has to be fake,’” said Newton, who first spent several minutes making sure to confirm that the event was a reality.

“It’s jarring. It’s absolutely jarring.”

NAACP Sioux Falls treasurer Ashley Knoff used the same word, and added “visceral” and “shocking.”

“Ever since the 2020 election, you see more and more neo-Nazi’s doing more and more things everywhere. You see the Proud Boys. You want to feel safe at home and like it’s not close, and then you see that and you think, ‘Oh, that’s what’s happening today.’ And, it’s a reality. It’s a reality at home. Everyday, people of my complexion face racism and discrimination, but to see just a hateful organization is just jarring.”

Advertisement

Jarring but not surprising to Julian Beaudion, who has lived in Sioux Falls for almost two decades and owns Swamp Daddy’s Cajun Kitchen and recently finished his tenure as executive director of the South Dakota African-American History Museum.

”Hatred has always been in South Dakota. Hatred has always been in America,” Beaudoin said. “Racism is bred within the cloth with what we call America, with what we call home, and it’s something that we fight against every day.”

And according to these leaders, the fight against bigotry isn’t strong enough from Gov. Kristi Noem, who issued a short social media statement that said, in part, that “Nazis are not welcome here” in South Dakota and that the state rejects all hate.

“I think its shocking that she has not made an in-person statement via her own social media,” Knoff said. ”We live in 2024. It does not take very long to flip your camera around and say, ‘I’m just as shocked as you are. I don’t want this happening in my state.’ I want a real, raw response, not something that’s canned.”

Although the neo-Nazi demonstrators were escorted away from the Capitol and sent away by law enforcement in Deadwood, there are concerns about law enforcement training when it comes to these situations.

Advertisement

Beaudion is a certified law enforcement officer who feels police were not prepared well enough to interact with the hate group. He also thinks those police forces in those cities would not be ready to interact with members of the community the hate group stands against.

“I think knowing the climate of our country right now, more should have been done in preparation to ensure that when these things happen, and I’m not saying if. We know that these things are going to happen. They’re happening across the country. They happened on January 6th. We have folks right here in South Dakota that participated in January 6th in Washington, D.C.”

“Knowing these things are going to happen, knowing that we have people living in our community that feel the way they do, we have to be prepared to battle against the hatred,” Beaudoin said. “We can’t just come out with the statement and say, ‘It has no home,’ if we’re not empowering our people to fight against hatred.”

“I think all of those things are so important when it comes to diffusing those situations, and they have not been equipped with any of that, and I think that’s a failure of our governor.

Knoff took it a step further.

Advertisement

“If a group of 15-25 black men in masks came to the city’s capital or city’s hall, the response would not be the same. It wouldn’t be just ‘disperse and have a great time,’” Knoff said.

“My nephews, my dad, my uncles, cousins, brothers would have been forfeiting their lives for doing such a thing.”

Knoff said she has fielded a bevvy of texts and phone calls over the last three days from people in the Black community asking her what is the NAACP and the Black community is going to do about this, and “what is our way of protecting our people and our community so this doesn’t happen and we don’t feel supported or feel seen by law enforcement, and what will happen to us?”

“I can tell you a lot of people don’t feel safe,” Knoff said. “It’s not a matter of if but probably when. We’re the biggest city, but if it happened in Pierre, and they’re already being vocal about it, why not? We’re having Juneteenth here next weekend. It’s not hard to see that, you know, hate crimes are going to be on the rise.”

From 2010 to 2019, the number of hate crime incidents recorded by law enforcement increased by 10%, from 6,628 reported incidents to 7,314 incidents. New statistics from the FBI for 2022 showed decrease in violent offenses and rise in hate crime incidents, a majority of which targeted Black people. The number of hate crimes reported to police in the nation’s 10 largest cities rose again in 2023, according to preliminary data released on Jan. 5 from the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at California State University.

Advertisement

The neo-Nazi marching in two of South Dakota’s higher-profile cities comes ahead of this weekend’s Juneteenth celebration in Sioux Falls. The federal holiday recognizes June 19th, 1865, when the last slaves in America were set free. Knoff said the NAACP is grateful local law enforcement will be on hand.

In a city of over 202,000, just over 13,000 are African-American, almost 7 percent.

Newton says that if you’re white, and stand against hate, and want minorities in the state to feel safe and welcome — go to the Juneteeth festivities and show your support. And, whether you can or can’t do that, to try and get to know your minority neighbors and co-workers. Have conversations.

“South Dakota is a welcoming place,” Newton said. “I do understand, though, that it is often in my experiences that (white people) haven’t met a ‘me’ before, or they haven’t gotten a chance to actually have a conversation, or a good-faith conversation with a person of color or a minority in this state. It’s one of those pieces where it’s easy to stereotype and dehumanize somebody if you don’t know who they are or don’t know them.

”The fact of the matter is, South Dakotans, people of color here, raise their families. They go to work. They pay their taxes. They go to church. They do all these things just like you. If you actually take the time to humanize us and people of color in the state, that might lead to a better understanding and a little less hate.”

Advertisement

Beaudion said neo-Nazi appearances are nothing new to South Dakota, and wouldn’t be in sioux Falls. He brought up a swastika being emblazoned in the cement of a public park. Of KKK fliers passed out to kids “with candy on them.”

“We’ve dealt with all these issues, and typically it’s every two years and it’s no coincidence that they happen right around election time,” Beaudoin said. “My fear is that intimidation will work around the community, and people will not vote. People will not register to vote. People will stop running for office.”

“My encouragement, my hope, is that people will do the opposite. People will start to register in droves, in record numbers, so, when some of these policies do come up, such as House Bill 1076 (a 2024 antisemitism bill/law the NAACP opposed because it did not protect all religions and races), we are better prepared and better equipped to fight against it by making our own policies that actually protect our community.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

South Dakota

South Dakota attorney general unveils package of new laws for 2025 legislative session

Published

on

South Dakota attorney general unveils package of new laws for 2025 legislative session


play

South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley hopes to prevent and catch future criminal conduct by state employees with new reporting requirements, protections for whistleblowers and a bigger role for the state auditor, according to a package of legislation he released Tuesday.

Advertisement

Jackley unveiled seven bills for lawmakers to consider during the annual legislative session that kicks off next Tuesday at the Capitol in Pierre.

Jackley’s bills focus on government accountability, human trafficking, prison contraband and probation.

Government accountability

Jackley’s government accountability measures come in response to several prosecutions he began last year against former state employees.

Those cases include allegations of former Department of Revenue employees creating fake vehicle titles to secure loans and avoid excise taxes, a former Department of Social Services employee allegedly embezzling $1.8 million, and a former Department of Public Safety employee allegedly filing fake food-service health inspection records for inspections that were never conducted.

Advertisement

“Protecting taxpayer dollars and restoring the public’s trust in government should be given high priority,” Jackley said Tuesday in a press release.

One of his proposed measures would require state employees in supervisory roles to report suspected unlawful conduct to the attorney general and state auditor. Failure to report suspected violations would be classified as a felony.

Additionally, the attorney general would be required to submit an annual report to lawmakers on the state budget committee outlining the number and outcomes of misconduct reports received.

Another bill seeks to shield state employees from retaliation for reporting misconduct or participating in audits and investigations. The bill would:

Advertisement
  • Prohibit state supervisors from discharging, discriminating against or taking any other retaliatory action against whistleblowers.
  • Establish a process allowing state employees to file complaints with the attorney general within two years after experiencing retaliation.
  • Authorize courts to reinstate employees and award back pay if they suffered illegal retaliation.

A third measure would authorize the state auditor to access all financial records of every state agency to conduct audits, investigate improper conduct and ensure internal controls are in place and maintained.

The fourth bill proposes state agencies conduct mandatory annual risk reviews, with results submitted to the Board of Internal Control. The reviews would assess agencies’ risk management practices and identify vulnerabilities.

Human trafficking

Another proposal would revise human trafficking laws and prohibit the obstruction of their enforcement.

“Human trafficking remains a national concern that we are not immune from, and this legislation strengthens victim protections and enhances our ability to hold offenders accountable,” Jackley said.

The bill would update the definitions of human trafficking in the first degree and second degree and would:

Advertisement
  • Establish mandatory minimum prison sentences of 15 years for a first offense and 20 years for a second or subsequent offense of human trafficking in the first degree.
  • Establish mandatory minimum prison sentences of five years for a first offense and 10 years for a second or subsequent offense of human trafficking in the second degree.
  • Create the new felony crime of obstructing the enforcement of human trafficking laws.

Prison contraband

Jackley’s legislative package also includes measures dealing with contraband in state correctional facilities. Officials with the state Department of Corrections reported finding contraband during a lockdown last year at the penitentiary in Sioux Falls.

Existing laws prohibit inmates from possessing drugs, unapproved prescription drugs, alcohol and weapons. Among other provisions, the proposed legislation would add unapproved cell phones and electronic communication devices to the list of banned items, clarify that employees and other people are prohibited from giving a similar list of items to inmates, and adjust the severity of various penalties for the different types of contraband.

Presumptive probation

Another proposal addresses South Dakota’s presumptive probation system, which mandates that some non-violent offenders receive probation instead of prison time. Jackley’s bill would make re-offenders who were already on probation or parole supervision ineligible for presumptive probation. 

The bill also adds those convicted of threatening public officials or fleeing law enforcement to the list of ineligible offenders, as well as sex offenders who violate safety zones.

“Sentencing courts need more flexibility to impose appropriate sentences for certain violent offenders, and those choosing to reoffend while on probation or parole,” Jackley said.

Advertisement

South Dakota Searchlight is part of States Newsroom, the nation’s largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.



Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

Landowners appeal Summit carbon storage decision • South Dakota Searchlight

Published

on

Landowners appeal Summit carbon storage decision • South Dakota Searchlight


A group of North Dakota landowners is appealing the state’s approval of an underground carbon storage area for Summit Carbon Solutions, the company attempting to build the world’s largest carbon capture and storage project.

The group represented by Bismarck attorney Derrick Braaten on Thursday filed the appeal in Burleigh County District Court, asserting that the North Dakota Industrial Commission withheld information and violated state law in approving the storage permit plan on Dec. 12.

The permanent underground carbon storage sites in western North Dakota are a key piece of Summit’s planned five-state pipeline network (including South Dakota) capturing greenhouse gas emissions from ethanol plants. Approving the storage wells was one of the last decisions of Gov. Doug Burgum as chair of the Industrial Commission, which also included Attorney General Drew Wrigley and Agriculture Commissioner Doug Goehring.

State schedules public input meetings on Summit carbon pipeline application

Advertisement

The unanimous vote by the commission means that landowners who had not signed an agreement with Summit will be forced to allow the carbon storage on their property.

The landowners assert that the Industrial Commission, which includes the state Department of Mineral Resources, illegally refused to disclose information to landowners under North Dakota open records laws. Braaten and his clients were seeking computer-generated models that predict where the carbon dioxide will go when it is pumped underground for permanent storage.

The appeal says former Department of Mineral Resources Director Lynn Helms refused to provide the models before, during and after public hearings on the case in June, shortly before Helms retired.

The order passed by the Industrial Commission said that if any open records requests were not fulfilled, it is because the Braaten Law Firm did not inform the agency that it had not received the records.

“That’s a lie,” Braaten told the North Dakota Monitor.

Advertisement

The appeal said Braaten’s firm was able to obtain the records in November. Braaten contends the computer models aren’t accurate but landowners were not given a chance to dispute that. He said multiple requests for a rehearing were ignored.

Another issue raised in the appeal are the state’s rules on underground storage. Under a process called amalgamation, if 60% of the landowners in a proposed storage area agree to the plan, the state can force the other 40% to comply.

Summit has obtained more than 92% of the pore space lease agreements across all three areas, according to the order approved in December.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

Advertisement

After the commission’s Dec. 12 decision, Summit Executive Vice President Wade Boeshans said the permits resulted from “years of rigorous scientific study, engineering design, and input from regulators, landowners, and local leaders.”

Braaten also is representing the Northwest Landowners Association that has a separate lawsuit before the North Dakota Supreme Court on the amalgamation issue that he contends is unconstitutional.

Advertisement

He said a ruling on either that lawsuit or the storage decision appeal should clarify the constitutionality of the rules.

Braaten’s law firm also is representing Emmons County in a separate legal challenge to the state Public Service Commission’s approval of the pipeline route through North Dakota. Emmons County and Burleigh County are challenging the PSC’s interpretation of state law that concluded state zoning rules preempt local ordinances on where pipelines are allowed.

Another group of landowners also is appealing the PSC permit decision.

Braaten said those appeals may be combined into one case.

This story was originally published by the North Dakota Monitor. Like South Dakota Searchlight, it’s part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. North Dakota Monitor maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Amy Dalrymple for questions: [email protected].
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

Former South Dakota DSS employee indicted for allegedly stealing voucher to buy groceries

Published

on

Former South Dakota DSS employee indicted for allegedly stealing voucher to buy groceries


A former South Dakota Department of Social Services employee was indicted on one count of social services fraud Thursday, according to a press release from the South Dakota Attorney General’s Office.

Amalia Escalante Barrientos, 28, allegedly used a stolen DSS voucher to purchase groceries for personal use, according to the press release. The incident occurred at a Brookings business Oct. 11.

The Brookings woman has not yet appeared for an initial hearing, according to Minnehaha County court documents.

According to Open SD, Barrientos’ wage is listed at $26.58 hourly.

Advertisement

If convicted, Barrientos could serve up to one year in the county jail, a $2,000 fine, or both, according to the press release.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending