Connect with us

South Dakota

Recap: Wisconsin Badgers edge past South Dakota 27-13 for 2-0 start to the season

Published

on

Recap: Wisconsin Badgers edge past South Dakota 27-13 for 2-0 start to the season


The Wisconsin Badgers were able to come up with a close win against the South Dakota Coyotes with a final score of 27 -13.

A well fought game from both sides, Wisconsin was able to slip away, despite struggling at times, thanks to a strong start and finish.

1st Half

Wisconsin’s offense started the game on fire, taking the ball downfield and scoring in on a seven-play, 75 yard touchdown drive that lasted just 2:46 of game time.

Advertisement

A huge play to Vinny Anthony for 32 yards off a play action bootleg and a 22 yard catch-and-run from Bryson Green put Wisconsin in place for a Chez Mellusi touchdown run.

With Tawee Walker out for the game, Cade Yacamelli took the role of RB2 and really showed out. Yacamelli had seven carries for 59 yards, including a huge 29-yard gain where he broke off multiple tackles and nearly edged past the defense for a score. Yacamelli was also effective in the pass game taking in two catches for 13 yards.

The defense showed out and started off much stronger than last week, however mishaps were definitely present. Safety Hunter Wohler and inside linebacker Jaheim Thomas led the team tackles in the first half and were both making plays all over the field.

The defensive line continued to have issues when trying to create pressure and win at the line of scrimmage, with defensive coordinator Mike Tressel relying on blitz packages to really cause quarterback pressure. Creating pressure with the front four is going to be pivotal for the Badgers moving forward and even to finish this game.

After a questionable performance last week, Van Dyke looked much more comfortable in the pocket in the first half, going 9-11 for 147 yards with a 50-yard bomb to C.J Williams for a score. The rhythm for Van Dyke is slowly settling in as offensive coordinator Phil Longo dialed up more of his RPO actions as the first half progressed.

Advertisement

The big question with Van Dyke was his progressions. He started the game off well going through his reads well and fast, however; as the game progressed, his rhythm was getting more and more off. One major misthrow was when Van Dyke underthrew an open C.J Williams deep down the hashes, which should have been a touchdown.

Getting Van Dyke in rhythm with the rest of the offense is going to be very important to do well with a tough schedule, as the Big Ten teams are not going to give him the time he currently has to go through his reads.

2nd Half

The Coyotes received the ball to start the second and took it all the way to the house. South Dako opened the half with four consecutive run plays, of which three resulted in gains of over 10 yards. The defensive line struggled in the first possession, restricting the flow of the linebackers and leading to these huge gains.

Coyotes running back Keyondray Logan-James ended the drive with a 35-yard touchdown run off a one-cut zone run, cutting the lead to a single touchdown. Missed tackles from Jaheim Thomas really hurt the Badgers on this drive as did the poor flowing of the linebackers.

The Badgers offense also struggled, starting the half off with a short possession, giving the ball right back to the Coyotes. This time around, the defense was able to hold after an initial push from the Coyotes offense, but a muffed punt by Vinny Anthony gave South Dakota the ball at the Wisconsin 8 yard line.

Advertisement

From that point on, the defense and especially the defensive line played lights out, getting a tipped pass as well as a sack by transfer Elijah Hills to force the Coyotes to kick a field goal, despite starting with favorable field position. They even survived a targeting call against linebacker Jake Chaney, which kept him out of the game and will force him to miss the first half next week against Alabama.

The Coyotes would go on to get shut out the rest of the way, as they were limited to only seven yards in the whole fourth quarter.

Defensive tackle Curt Neal and backup linebacker Tackett Curtis, who replaced ejected linebacker Jake Chaney, especially shined in the second half, coming up with huge tackle for losses, and playing their gaps properly, limiting the Coyotes’ explosive run game.

Quarterback Tyler Van Dyke took a step down in the second half, only completing half of his 16 second-half passes, but the Badgers run game was able to get them into the end zone and run the clock down.

Running backs Chez Mellusi and Cade Yacamelli really helped take the pressure off of Van Dyke and create a sort of rhythm that was missing from this team in the early part of the second half. True freshman backs Darrion Dupree and Dilin Jones also saw the field during the Badgers last offensive possession as they bullied their way through the South Dakota defense to run out the clock.

Advertisement

The comeback of the Badgers defense and the methodical play calling of Phil Longo allowed the Badgers to escape with this win. However, as the season goes on, it is going to be very important for Van Dyke to get used to the RPO reads and the overall offense in order to compete with stacked Big Ten teams. The Badgers can not rely solely on their plethora of running backs to win them games.

Personal Thoughts

The Badgers struggling against both their preseason FCS matchups is not a good sign for this season.

The team definitely has the talent and coaching to be competitive in the Big Ten, but mental errors are really hurting this team. They need to get their offense on the same page in order to get the rhythm and timing necessary for Phil Longo’s offense.

On the other side of the ball, the defensive line needs to do a much better job of creating quarterback pressure and winning the line of scrimmage battles. Without a strong line push, it becomes difficult for linebackers to flow and make tackles, which is why the Coyotes were able to get the ball going on the ground.

While there were signs of good defensive play and offensive play that we know this team is capable of, the consistency has to be improved before the big game against Alabama next week.

Advertisement

Another key point is the emergence of Cade Yacamelli and his ability to really change the game. Yacamelli went for 73 yards on eight rushes, breaking out a huge run of 29 yards. His downhill running ability combined with great vision can be really helpful for the Badgers when they need a spark plug. Look to see him get integrated more and more into the game plan as the season progresses, even with the backs at hand.

Lastly, Fickell’s experimentation with the defensive backs looks to be working well. True freshman Xavier Lucas had another great game, and the rotation at nickel with Austin Brown, Max Lofy, and even Nyzier Fourqurean is really helping defensive coordinator Mike Tressel open up his defensive playbook.

With a big game against Alabama coming up next week, it is pivotal for the Badgers to get on the same page offensively and consistently drive the ball downfield. The defensive line has to be faster off the ball and better at maintaining their gaps to allow the second and third lines to flow and make tackles.

These small improvements will take this team to a different level and could even put them in the conversation for a possible top 25 ranking, should Wisconsin show out next weekend.



Source link

Advertisement

South Dakota

Nature: Prairie chickens in South Dakota

Published

on

Nature: Prairie chickens in South Dakota




Nature: Prairie chickens in South Dakota – CBS News

Advertisement














Advertisement



























Advertisement

Watch CBS News


We leave you this Sunday morning with prairie chickens and sharp tail grouse near Ft. Pierre, South Dakota. Videographer: Kevin Kjergaard.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

Democrats fail to field candidates for a majority of South Dakota legislative seats

Published

on

Democrats fail to field candidates for a majority of South Dakota legislative seats


(SOUTH DAKOTA SEARCHLIGHT) – Democrats are running for 46 of South Dakota’s 105 legislative seats — leaving 56% of seats without a Democratic candidate.

That doesn’t bode well for the party ahead of November, said Michael Card, professor emeritus of political science at the University of South Dakota.

“It doesn’t put them in a position to actually put forward their ideological policy preferences and have much of a success at getting those enacted,” Card said.

In the state Senate alone, Democrats have failed to field a candidate for 22 seats, which is nearly two-thirds of the chamber. In the House, Democrats have failed to field a candidate for 38 seats, which is 54% of the chamber.

Advertisement

There is only one Democratic legislative primary in the state: a state Senate race in District 26, which includes the Rosebud Reservation.

There are no statewide Democratic primaries, after announced candidates for governor and U.S. House dropped out or failed to gather enough petition signatures to make the ballot, leaving one Democrat in each of those races.

Statewide candidates will have less name recognition than Republican candidates ahead of the general election, since they didn’t have primaries, Card said. In the Legislature, Card said Democrats “are guaranteeing they won’t get a majority.”

In contrast, Republicans have primary races for governor, U.S. House and U.S. Senate. Five legislative districts do not have Republican primaries, but do have Republican candidates. There is a Republican candidate running for every legislative seat, except for one House seat in District 27, which includes the Pine Ridge Reservation.

Card said there are several factors leading to poor candidate turnout among Democrats, including a self-fulfilling cycle of failure.

Advertisement

“A lack of winning makes fewer people willing to take a chance on running for office,” Card said. “Why run if I think I’m going to lose?”

Democrats haven’t held a statewide office since 2015, and they haven’t held a majority of either legislative chamber since 1994.

Joe Zweifel, deputy executive director of the South Dakota Democratic Party, said the organization worked “really, really hard” to convince Democrats to run for office.

“But you can’t force people to run for office,” said Zweifel, of Sioux Falls, who’s running for a legislative seat himself in District 12.

He’s heard the open seats called a “failure.” But he disagrees, choosing to focus on the Democrats who did step forward.

Advertisement

“We’re running quality, good candidates in those races,” Zweifel said.

The South Dakota Democratic Party hopes to build on legislative successes, such as a new law from Rep. Kadyn Wittman, D-Sioux Falls, that commits state funding to cover the family portion of reduced-price school meals.

“That specifically is a return on investment for our donors, and it shows that Democrats are doing good things for the people of South Dakota,” Zweifel said.

Wittman’s success helped inspire Democratic District 13 House of Representatives candidate Ali Rae Horsted, of Sioux Falls, to take a second run at the Legislature. Horsted ran unsuccessfully for the Senate against Sen. Sue Peterson in 2024, garnering 42% of the vote.

Horsted plans to build on that success and the name recognition she already has in the district. She hopes she’ll have “better odds” in this election, since there are two House seats for every district.

Advertisement

Horsted said it would better serve South Dakota if the state had a more balanced Legislature. While the latest Legislature was 92% Republican, 52% of voters in South Dakota are Republican. South Dakota has the lowest percentage of Democrats, 7.6%, in the Legislature nationwide.

“I think it’s important that people have options on the ballot,” Horsted said, “and people are able to vote for candidates that represent their values and their vision for the future of South Dakota.”

Makenzie Huber is a lifelong South Dakotan who regularly reports on the intersection of politics and policy with health, education, social services and Indigenous affairs. Her work with South Dakota Searchlight earned her the title of South Dakota’s Outstanding Young Journalist in 2024, and she was a 2024 finalist for the national Livingston Awards.

South Dakota Searchlight is part of States Newsroom, the nation’s largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Advertisement

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.

Copyright 2026 KOTA. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

From Big Ideas to Better Places: Building Livable Communities Across South Dakota

Published

on

From Big Ideas to Better Places: Building Livable Communities Across South Dakota


From East River to West River, South Dakota communities share a common goal: creating places where people of all ages can live, work and thrive. AARP’s Domains of Livability provide a framework to help communities do just that. Through the AARP Community Challenge grant program—designed to spark quick, impactful local projects—South Dakota communities are turning big ideas into visible, people-centered improvements.

Read the South Dakota Community Challenge Grant Report, which showcases grant-funded projects across the state designed to build more livable communities.

What Are AARP’s Domains of Livability?

AARP’s approach to livable communities is rooted in eight interconnected domains that together support quality of life at every age:

  1. Outdoor Spaces and Buildings – Safe, accessible parks, streets and public buildings
  2. Transportation – Affordable, accessible options for getting around
  3. Housing – A range of choices that support independence
  4. Social Participation – Opportunities to connect, learn and have fun
  5. Respect and Social Inclusion – Communities that value people of all backgrounds and ages
  6. Civic Participation and Employment – Meaningful ways to engage and contribute
  7. Communication and Information – Clear, accessible ways to stay informed
  8. Community Support and Health Services – Access to services that support well-being

These domains work best when addressed together—something South Dakota communities are embracing.

bike lane in neighborhood being separated by wire

Advertisement

Turning Vision into Action with Community Challenge Grants

AARP Community Challenge grants fund short-term, “quick-action” projects that can ignite long-term change. Across South Dakota, these grants have helped communities pilot ideas, build momentum and demonstrate what’s possible when residents put people first.

Here’s how local projects are bringing the Domains of Livability to life:

  • Outdoor Spaces and Buildings: Communities have used grants to enhance parks, create pop-up public spaces, add benches and shade and install wayfinding signs. These improvements invite people to linger, gather, and enjoy shared spaces—supporting both physical activity and social connection.
  • Transportation: Small, thoughtful transportation projects can make a big difference. Community Challenge grants have supported safer crossings, improved walkability and bikeability around key destinations and the planning or installation of transit amenities like shelters and seating—especially important for older adults and people with mobility challenges.
  • Housing and Community Support: Some projects focus on helping residents age in place by improving access to information about home modification resources or by testing neighborhood-level solutions that connect people to services. These efforts strengthen independence and peace of mind.
  • Social Participation and Inclusion: Murals, community events and creative placemaking projects funded by AARP grants have sparked community pride and social connection. By involving residents in design and implementation, these projects foster respect, inclusion and a strong sense of belonging across generations.
  • Communication, Civic Participation and Opportunity: From hosting community conversations to creating new tools for sharing local information, South Dakota communities are using grants to engage residents in shaping their future. These efforts elevate local voices and encourage ongoing civic participation.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending