Connect with us

South Dakota

How to buy Wisconsin Badgers vs. South Dakota Coyotes tickets

Published

on

How to buy Wisconsin Badgers vs. South Dakota Coyotes tickets


The Wisconsin Badgers face an FCS opponent, the South Dakota Coyotes (1-0), at Camp Randall Stadium on Saturday, September 7, 2024.

If you are looking for Badgers vs. Coyotes tickets, information is available below.

Wisconsin vs. South Dakota game info

Shop Wisconsin vs. South Dakota tickets

How to buy Wisconsin vs. South Dakota tickets for college football Week 2

You can buy tickets to see the Badgers square off against the Coyotes from multiple sources.

Advertisement

Wisconsin Badgers schedule

  • Week 1: August 30 at 9:00 p.m. ET vs. Western Michigan Broncos – 28-14 win
  • Week 2: September 7 at 3:30 p.m. ET vs. South Dakota Coyotes
  • Week 3: September 14 at 12:00 p.m. ET vs. Alabama Crimson Tide
  • Week 5: September 28 at 1:00 p.m. ET at USC Trojans
  • Week 6: October 5 at 1:00 p.m. ET vs. Purdue Boilermakers
  • Week 7: October 12 at 1:00 p.m. ET at Rutgers Scarlet Knights
  • Week 8: October 19 at 1:00 p.m. ET at Northwestern Wildcats
  • Week 9: October 26 at 1:00 p.m. ET vs. Penn State Nittany Lions
  • Week 10: November 2 at 1:00 p.m. ET at Iowa Hawkeyes
  • Week 12: November 16 at 1:00 p.m. ET vs. Oregon Ducks
  • Week 13: November 23 at 1:00 p.m. ET at Nebraska Cornhuskers
  • Week 14: November 29 at 12:00 p.m. ET vs. Minnesota Golden Gophers

Shop Wisconsin football tickets

Wisconsin Badgers stats

  • Wisconsin is putting up 388.0 yards per game on offense (79th in the FBS), and rank 51st on the other side of the ball, yielding 261.0 yards allowed per game.
  • The Badgers are averaging 28.0 points per game on offense, which ranks them 81st in the FBS. On the defensive side of the ball, they rank 57th, surrendering 14.0 points per contest.
  • Wisconsin is totaling 192.0 passing yards per game on offense, which ranks them 89th in the FBS. The defense ranks 46th, surrendering 141.0 passing yards per game.
  • The Badgers are averaging 196.0 rushing yards per game on offense, which ranks them 51st in the FBS. On the other side of the ball, they rank 68th, surrendering 120.0 rushing yards per contest.

South Dakota Coyotes schedule

  • Week 1: August 29 at 8:00 p.m. ET vs. Northern State Wolves – 45-3 win
  • Week 2: September 7 at 3:30 p.m. ET at Wisconsin Badgers
  • Week 3: September 14 at 4:00 p.m. ET at Portland State Vikings
  • Week 4: September 21 at 2:00 p.m. ET vs. Drake Bulldogs
  • Week 5: September 28 at 2:00 p.m. ET vs. Southern Illinois Salukis
  • Week 6: October 5 at 3:00 p.m. ET at Murray State Racers
  • Week 7: October 12 at 3:00 p.m. ET vs. Northern Iowa Panthers
  • Week 8: October 19 at 6:00 p.m. ET at Youngstown State Penguins
  • Week 9: October 26 at 3:00 p.m. ET at South Dakota State Jackrabbits
  • Week 11: November 9 at 2:00 p.m. ET vs. Indiana State Sycamores
  • Week 12: November 16 at 1:00 p.m. ET at North Dakota Fighting Hawks
  • Week 13: November 23 at 2:00 p.m. ET vs. North Dakota State Bison

Shop South Dakota football tickets

South Dakota Coyotes stats

  • South Dakota has been excelling on the defensive side of the ball, surrendering only 207.0 total yards per game (fourth-best). On offense, it ranks 39th by accumulating 351.0 total yards per game.
  • The Coyotes have been a top-25 unit on both offense and defense this season, as they rank eighth-best in points per game (45.0) and second-best in points surrendered per game (3.0).
  • South Dakota ranks 23rd-worst in passing yards per game on offense (85.0), but at least it has been dominating on the other side of the ball, ranking second-best in passing yards allowed per contest (60.0).
  • The Coyotes’ run defense ranks 41st in the FCS with 147.0 rushing yards surrendered per game, but they’ve been carried by their offense, which ranks fourth-best by generating 266.0 rushing yards per contest.

Shop Wisconsin vs. South Dakota tickets



Source link

South Dakota

Black Hills Bottlenecks: Road work update for the week of May 11

Published

on

Black Hills Bottlenecks: Road work update for the week of May 11


RAPID CITY, S.D. (KOTA) – More road work and travel impacts are set to begin across western South Dakota this week, with projects ranging from highway striping and crack sealing to temporary rest area closures as well as an upcoming public meeting on a bridge replacement project in Keystone.

The first projects begin Monday, May 11.

S.D. Highway 44: Striping work

On S.D. Highway 44, crews will complete striping work from about 1.5 miles east of Farmingdale to roughly 10.75 miles east of the community.

1.5 miles east of Farmingdale to roughly 10.75 miles east of the community(SDDOT)

Work is scheduled from 6 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday and is expected to continue through Tuesday evening. Drivers should expect daytime lane impacts in the area.

Advertisement

U.S. Highway 385: Striping work

Also beginning Monday, striping operations are scheduled on U.S. Highway 385 from about one mile south of the U.S. Highway 85 junction near Deadwood to the junction itself. Work is expected to take place during daytime hours Monday through Tuesday.

One mile south of the U.S. Highway 85 junction near Deadwood to the junction itself
One mile south of the U.S. Highway 85 junction near Deadwood to the junction itself(SDDOT)

Pavement preservation project on S.D. Highway 20

A pavement preservation project is also scheduled to start Monday on S.D. Highway 20 between Buffalo and Camp Crook. Crews will be sealing cracks in the roadway as part of the project. Traffic will be reduced to one lane during daytime hours, with flaggers and a pilot car guiding motorists through the work zone. Delays of up to 15 minutes are expected.

S.D. Highway 20 between Buffalo and Camp Crook
S.D. Highway 20 between Buffalo and Camp Crook(SDDOT)

The contractor for the $112,155 project is Highway Improvement, Inc. of Sioux Falls. The overall completion date is scheduled for Dec. 4.

Drivers are reminded to slow down and use caution around crews and construction equipment in all work zones.

Wasta rest area spring cleaning

Additional travel impacts are expected latter this week with temporary closures planned at the Wasta Rest Areas along Interstate 90 for annual spring cleaning.

Wasta rest area spring cleaning
Wasta rest area spring cleaning(SDDOT)

The eastbound Wasta Rest Area near mile marker 98 will close at 7 a.m. Tuesday, May 12, and reopen at 9 a.m. Wednesday, May 13. After that reopening, the westbound rest area will close from 9 a.m. Wednesday until 9 a.m. Thursday, May 14. Travelers are encouraged to make alternate plans during the closures.

Public meeting on future bridge replacement project along U.S. Highway 16A in Keystone

On Thursday, May 14, the South Dakota Department of Transportation and Complete Concrete, Inc. will host a public informational meeting on a future bridge replacement project along U.S. Highway 16A in Keystone.

The open house-style meeting will run from 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. at the Keystone Community Center, 1101 Madill St. Officials say the meeting is intended to provide project details and answer questions from residents, businesses and emergency personnel.

Advertisement
Public meeting on future bridge replacement project along U.S. Highway 16A in Keystone
Public meeting on future bridge replacement project along U.S. Highway 16A in Keystone(SDDOT)

The bridge replacement project is scheduled to begin in October. Plans call for replacing the existing bridge with a box culvert and include additional improvements such as intersection upgrades, resurfacing, pavement markings, traffic signals, ADA upgrades and erosion control. Pedestrian access on both sides of the structure will also be improved.

More information on the Keystone project is available at South Dakota Department of Transportation’s project page.

Current road conditions, closures and construction updates can be found at SD511 or by dialing 511.

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.

Copyright 2026 KOTA. All rights reserved.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

SD Lottery Millionaire for Life winning numbers for May 10, 2026

Published

on


The South Dakota Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big.

Here’s a look at May 10, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Millionaire for Life numbers from May 10 drawing

01-03-20-35-46, Bonus: 05

Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your prize

  • Prizes of $100 or less: Can be claimed at any South Dakota Lottery retailer.
  • Prizes of $101 or more: Must be claimed from the Lottery. By mail, send a claim form and a signed winning ticket to the Lottery at 711 E. Wells Avenue, Pierre, SD 57501.
  • Any jackpot-winning ticket for Dakota Cash or Lotto America, top prize-winning ticket for Lucky for Life, or for the second prizes for Powerball and Mega Millions must be presented in person at a Lottery office. A jackpot-winning Powerball or Mega Millions ticket must be presented in person at the Lottery office in Pierre.

When are the South Dakota Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 9:59 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 10 p.m. CT on Tuesday and Friday.
  • Lucky for Life: 9:38 p.m. CT daily.
  • Lotto America: 9:15 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Dakota Cash: 9 p.m. CT on Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Millionaire for Life: 10:15 p.m. CT daily.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a South Dakota editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Continue Reading

South Dakota

After Standing Rock, could a canceled mine project offer a roadmap for opponents of a new oil pipeline in South Dakota?

Published

on

After Standing Rock, could a canceled mine project offer a roadmap for opponents of a new oil pipeline in South Dakota?


Almost exactly a decade since the start of the Standing Rock protests against the Dakota Access pipeline gained national and international attention, new disputes are simmering over tribal rights in the Black Hills of South Dakota.

Earlier this month, an environmental organization and a Native American advocacy group sued the US Forest Service, claiming that an exploratory graphite drilling project on national forest land threatened a recognized ceremonial site on mountain meadows known as Pe’ Sla, or Reynolds Prairie.

But on Friday, Pete Lien and Sons, the company behind the project, abruptly withdrew, saying it would perform reclamation on the site and would not seek to file another plan. The decision came as a striking victory for Native American tribes and environmental groups that had opposed it – but other projects in the works may not meet the same conclusion.

The project, claimed nine groups within the Sioux Nation, including the Standing Rock Sioux, would “directly and significantly” affect the use of Pe’ Sla, which sits within Ȟe Sápa, the Lakota name for the sacred Black Hills of South Dakota, itself the locus of Lakota creation myths.

Advertisement

A second exploratory project by a Canadian company looking to mine uranium on state-owned land could affect Craven Canyon, an area that contains 7,000-year-old sites of importance to Indigenous tribes, historians and archaeologists.

Opposition to the twin projects – backed by Pete Lien, of Rapid City, and by Clean Nuclear Energy Corp – comes as a proposed Alberta-to-Wyoming pipeline for carrying Canadian crude oil to ⁠the US is close to securing commitments from oil ⁠companies after Donald Trump granted permitting through an executive order.

All the projects have at their heart issues of extraction, water safety and sacred sites, much as the Standing Rock dispute of 2016 that saw “water protesters” gather in a standoff with law enforcement over concerns regarding water safety and sacred sites.

That case began when the Standing Rock Sioux passed a resolution stating that “the Dakota Access Pipeline poses a serious risk to the very survival of our Tribe and … would destroy valuable cultural resources” and was a violation of the 1868 Fort Laramie Treaty guaranteeing the “undisturbed use and occupation” of reservation lands surrounding the pipeline.

In the aftermath, the environmental group Greenpeace was ordered to pay damages of $345m by a North Dakota judge to pipeline company Energy Transfer and subsidiary Dakota Access in connection with the protests, an order that is set to go to appeal. Greenpeace claims the legal action is designed to silence activists.

Advertisement

Most of the current disputes relate to energy, reflecting the Trump administration’s drive toward US energy independence and away from dependence on foreign sources, particularly China. Graphite, used in electric vehicle batteries, is almost exclusively imported. Roughly 95%–99% of uranium is purchased from foreign sources, including Russia and Kazakhstan.

The pipeline deal, meanwhile, is expected to help increase oil output from Canada, the world’s fourth-largest producer, to around 6.1m barrels a day, up from 5.5m now. Bridger, the company behind the Alberta-to-Wyoming pipeline, has said the project was being developed in response to identified market interest.

Wizipan “Little Elk” Garriott, a member of NDN Collective, an Indigenous rights group opposing the mining at Pe’ Sla, says the entire process of approval for the planned mine “happened in the dark”.

“There was no notice that they were proceeding provided to us, nor to the sovereign tribal nations,” he says, in violation of environmental and cultural impact study requirements and consultations with the tribes.

Lilias Jarding, director of the Black Hills Clean Water Alliance, one of the parties in the victorious Pe’ Sla action, says the decade since Standing Rock has seen a huge growth in projects attempting to mine tribal lands and areas of ceremonial significance.

Advertisement

Since the start of the second Trump administration, the push for both minerals extraction and energy has dramatically increased. “They’re being more aggressive,” Jarding says. In the case of Pe’ Sla, he adds, the company didn’t stop drilling when the lawsuits was filed: “They started drilling 24 hours a day.”

The alliance, along with tribes, claim the graphite project violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and that the US Forest Service improperly used a process known as a “categorical exclusion” to bypass reviews.

Oglala Sioux president Frank Star Comes Out said in a statement that the Sioux tribes never ceded to the US the lands in the Black Hills, which, he said, “remain the spiritual center of the Great Sioux Nation and they are not for sale, lease or exploitation” and that the lawsuit is a “united tribal response to protect a sacred site from those who continue to desecrate our ancestral lands”.

Oglala activist Taylor Gunhammer said that drilling at Pe’ Sla was akin to “drilling under the Vatican or at a sacred site in Jerusalem”.

A representative of Clean Nuclear Energy Corp, Mike Blady, said the company was “aware of the cultural significance and are doing everything in our power to ensure that there is no collateral damage”.

Advertisement

Will this amount to a populist action similar to Standing Rock?

The Pe’ Sla dispute did not provoke the kind of Indigenous-led, grassroots resistance to fossil-fuel infrastructure projects that accompanied the Dakota Access pipeline, which in some ways became a template for contemporary protests, powered by social media, celebrities and politicians.

The tribes were not in favor of following in that direction, Jarding says: “It’s a deeply sacred spiritual and ceremonial site, and elders have made it clear that it’s not a good place for another Standing Rock with thousands of people. They say this is not the place.”

Under the Biden administration, the tribal groups felt they were entering into a period of co-management policy over federal lands that in many cases lie within treaty agreements. But under the Trump administration, that sense of co-operation has diminished.

“We’ve seen a ramp-up of opening up federal lands for mineral and gas exploration, but as a planet we need to be moving away from fossil fuels and toward policies that are sustainable into the future,” says NDN’s Garriott.

Advertisement

What was planned for Pe’ Sla now, or was happening at Standing Rock a decade ago, or has indeed happened over a long history of disputes between sovereign tribal groups and the US government, he says, is “protecting our land and protecting our water, not only for ourselves but for the planet. We’re not random protesters out there – we’re protecting our own land”.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending