South Dakota
Fewer Than 450 Patients Certified in South Dakota Medical Cannabis Program
![Fewer Than 450 Patients Certified in South Dakota Medical Cannabis Program Fewer Than 450 Patients Certified in South Dakota Medical Cannabis Program](https://hightimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/shutterstock_244196869-scaled.jpg)
The fledgling medical hashish program in South Dakota continues to construct at a gradual tempo, with an area information report this week saying that solely a bit of greater than 400 sufferers have been licensed since registration started on the finish of final 12 months.
That comes by way of the Argus Chief newspaper of Sioux Falls, which reported that, as of Tuesday, “the Division of Well being had issued simply 419 medical marijuana playing cards to sufferers.”
In line with the newspaper, that has prompted MyMarijuanaCards.com, a nationally acknowledged telehealth firm, to host the “the state’s first-ever, three-day mass affected person screening occasion Tuesday in downtown Sioux Falls,” South Dakota’s largest metropolis. The occasion runs by Thursday.
“Regardless of being out there since November, only some South Dakota residents have been capable of acquire a state-issued medical hashish card because of the restricted variety of docs approved to certify sufferers within the state,” MyMarijuanaCards.com founder Molefi Branson instructed the Argus Chief.
It isn’t simply sufferers who’ve been gradual to enroll. Final month, native tv station KELO reported that “solely 90 South Dakota docs have been authorised to validate the usage of medical marijuana to their sufferers,” which accounts for “simply 4.07% of the state’s 2,214 complete energetic physicians.”
Branson mentioned there are features of South Dakota’s medical hashish registration course of that could be inflicting the affected person enrollee numbers to lag.
The Argus Chief reported that “Branson mentioned South Dakota’s medical marijuana regulation requires South Dakotans obtain certification from a medical skilled licensed to follow drugs earlier than they are often thought-about for a card by the [state Department of Health],” and that the state’s “regulation additionally requires screenings be in individual, not over the phone or by way of video convention, as allowed in a number of different states.”
The newspaper additionally famous a reluctance “among the many healthcare techniques in South Dakota to supply route to their physicians about certifying sufferers, [which] has made certification a problem for a lot of, together with a handful of the purchasers who attended the occasion Tuesday.”
It has been a turbulent year-and-a-half for hashish reform efforts within the Mount Rushmore State. Voters there authorised a pair of poll measures in 2020—one which legalized leisure pot for adults, and one other that approved medical hashish—however the ensuing 18 months have introduced controversy with every.
The leisure hashish regulation was struck down by the state Supreme Court docket final 12 months following a authorized problem waged by South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem.
The courtroom concurred that the hashish modification violated the state’s structure.
“South Dakota is a spot the place the rule of regulation and our Structure matter, and that’s what immediately’s choice is about,” Noem mentioned in a press release following the November ruling. “We do issues proper—and the way we do issues issues simply as a lot as what we’re doing. We’re nonetheless ruled by the rule of regulation. This choice doesn’t have an effect on my Administration’s implementation of the medical hashish program voters authorised in 2020. That program was launched earlier this month, and the primary playing cards have already gone out to eligible South Dakotans.”
The medical hashish regulation formally took impact final July, however there stays one dispensary within the state, situated on a tribal reservation in Flandreau, South Dakota.
The Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe, which operates the dispensary, maintains that its medical hashish playing cards needs to be handled as legally legitimate, however Noem’s administration has mentioned that it could solely acknowledge playing cards issued to members of the tribe.
In February, tribal officers mentioned that greater than 100 people who had been issued medical hashish playing cards have been arrested. The tribe mentioned on the time that it has issued 1000’s of playing cards to tribal and non-tribal members alike.
![](https://newspub.live/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/np-logo.png)
South Dakota
Videos: Gundy, Players Recap Win against South Dakota State
![Videos: Gundy, Players Recap Win against South Dakota State Videos: Gundy, Players Recap Win against South Dakota State](https://pistolsfiringblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/53962121679_afc402ad55_k-1000x600.jpg)
STILLWATER — The Oklahoma State football team beat South Dakota State 44-20 on Saturday to start the season 1-0. After the game, Mike Gundy, Ollie Gordon, Alan Bowman, De’Zhaun Stribling, Collin Oliver, Korie Black and Trey Rucker met with reporters to recap the game.
South Dakota
South Dakota State vs. No. 17 Oklahoma State live stream (8/31/24): Watch college football, Week 1 online
![South Dakota State vs. No. 17 Oklahoma State live stream (8/31/24): Watch college football, Week 1 online South Dakota State vs. No. 17 Oklahoma State live stream (8/31/24): Watch college football, Week 1 online](https://www.nj.com/resizer/v2/P2NH7TDAORCA3K2CFKZ3D37LHE.jpg?auth=27a73779c5e6defa1fa563e3ee42ddc0fe62687da0c8b6ecc5664751c4c0c4a2&width=1280&quality=90)
The South Dakota State Jackrabbits face the No. 17 Oklahoma State Cowboys on Saturday, Aug. 31, 2024 (8/31/24) at Boone Pickens Stadium in Stillwater, Oklahoma.
Fans can watch the game with a subscription to ESPN+.
Here’s what you need to know:
What: NCAA Football, Week 1
Who: South Dakota State vs. Oklahoma State
When: Saturday, Aug. 31, 2024 (8/31/24)
Where: Boone Pickens Stadium
Time: 2 p.m. ET
TV: N/A
Channel finder: Verizon Fios, AT&T U-verse, Comcast Xfinity, Spectrum/Charter, Optimum/Altice,Cox,DIRECTV, Dish, Hulu, fuboTV, Sling.
Live stream: ESPN+
***
Here’s a college football story from the Associated Press:
Y’all ain’t played nobody!
It might as well be college football’s slogan. Debates about strength of schedule are part of the fabric of the sport, like marching bands, cheerleaders and tailgating.
With the size of the College Football Playoff tripling in size from four teams to 12 this season — including seven at-large bids — expect the arguments over the relative difficulty of teams’ schedules to increase exponentially.
The posturing and politicking has already begun.
“This is the NFL of college football in my mind,” Nebraska coach Matt Rhule said during Big Ten media days. At Southeastern Conference media days, the NFL was also invoked when the topic steered to schedules.
“As coaches we want to play the best. People forget that when you’ve spent time in the NFL, every week was like that,” Georgia coach Kirby Smart said. “So when Texas and Oklahoma came into the conference, every schedule was going to get harder.”
The debates aren’t just about which conferences are the best. With super-sized conferences of 16-18 teams, the differences in strength of schedule within leagues can be significant.
The CFP selection committee uses a strength-of-schedule rating provided by SportSource Analytics that includes components such as wins and losses, scoring differential and game location.
Balancing who you played with how you played will be harder than ever.
“There’s a weight on the committee that’s new. I want to see how the committee processes that,” SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey said during spring meetings. “And my encouragement is that this, ‘Well, we have an undefeated team so they’re in’ is not the standard. It never was the standard. Obviously, that stirred up controversy last year.”
Toughest schedules in the Power Four
There are dozens of data-based rating systems to measure the relative strength of college football teams, and all have some type of schedule-rating component.
The AP took three systems — ESPN’s SP+, FEI and KFord Ratings — and averaged their strength of schedule rankings for all 134 Bowl Subdivision teams to determine where each Power Four team’s schedule ranks nationally (all games, not just conference games, are factored in).
Using those projections, SEC teams on average will be facing the toughest schedules this season.
The average strength-of-schedule ranking among the 16 SEC teams is 11.2, from Florida (a unanimous No. 1 among all three systems) to Missouri at 36.7.
Half the teams in the SEC have schedules with an average national ranking of 10 or better, including No. 1 Georgia at 3.7. No. 11 Missouri is the only SEC team with an average schedule-strength ranking below 25.3.
Rating the rest
The Big Ten, now including Southern California, UCLA, Oregon and Washington, is next with an average strength-of-schedule ranking of 26.9 among its 18 teams.
Purdue’s 7.7 average ranking is the highest followed by No. 23 USC at 9. Big Ten favorite No. 2 Ohio State’s average is 34. No. 3 Oregon’s is 26.7.
The ACC and Big 12 are about the same. The 17-team ACC has an average strength of schedule ranking of 49.9. The 16-team Big 12′s average ranking is 47.3.
Assessing strength of schedule
Straight up rankings can be deceiving. How to quantify the difference between facing the sixth-ranked schedule and 26th?
Brian Fremeau, the creator of FEI, does it three ways, asking three questions: How many games would an elite team lose facing a particular schedule? How many would a good team lose? How many would an average team lose?
AP used FEI’s strength of schedule ratings based on good teams in its composite rankings, since good teams are going to be the ones in the CFP race.
Based on FEI projections, the difference between playing Georgia’s schedule (rated 3.4 among the hardest in the nation) and Ohio State (34) is about one more loss for a good team against the Bulldogs’ slate. The difference between Alabama’s schedule and Big 12 favorite Utah’s is about two losses for a good team against the Tide’s.
If these schedule strength projections held — they will change throughout the season — it would then be reasonable to compare an 11-1 Utah to a 9-3 Alabama.
Reasonable to compare doesn’t necessarily mean the one with the tougher schedule should automatically be ranked higher.
“I don’t judge a team on its schedule. I judge a team on how it performs against a schedule, or my system does. And that is a little more of a nuanced take then, ‘Well, we played a tougher set of opponents than you did, therefore, we’re better,’” Fremeau said. “There’s a bit of a balancing act between the two.”
Intraconference debates
The SEC and Big Ten are both bigger and division-less for the first time. That necessitated new tiebreaker procedures to determine which teams qualify for conference title games featuring the top two teams in the standings.
Within the guidelines is an acknowledgment that the rigor of conference schedules will vary when teams are playing barely half the league. After head-to-head and record vs. common opponents are used to break ties, both leagues go to results that favor the team that fared better against the better conference opponents they play.
The ACC, a year ahead of the the SEC and Big Ten in abandoning divisions, has a similar nod within its tiebreakers to strength of schedule.
ACC Associate Commissioner Michael Strickland said the conference used 10 years of data that measures the success of its football teams to help create a new schedule rotation that would be competitively balanced. But the ACC also to had weigh travel now that Stanford, California and SMU are members, as well as protecting some traditional annual rivalries.
The ACC’s fourth two-team tiebreaker is combined winning percentage of conference opponents.
“Our head football coaches suggested that we insert that during our review process,” Strickland said.
The CFP choices
The CFP field announced Dec. 8 will be comprised of the five highest-ranked conference champions, regardless of league, and seven at-large selections. There is no limit to the number of at-large bids a conference can receive.
The most interesting comparisons for the CFP selection committee might end up being between the many conference rivals that do not play each other in the regular season.
What to do with a 10-2 Missouri and a 9-3 Alabama (composite strength-of-schedule ranking, 9.3)? Or Iowa (37) at 10-2 and Michigan (16) at 9-3? Over in the ACC, what would happen while assessing a 10-2 Virginia Tech (68) and a 9-3 Florida State (30.3)?
“Especially when we’re picking (seven) teams now, we’re looking at the loss column with a bit more scrutiny,” Fremeau said. “They’re going to be debating teams like that with a one or possibly two-game difference in record, but a comparable difference in expected schedule rating and they’re going to have that debate about which one they value more.”
(The Associated Press contributed to this report)
Thank you for relying on us to provide the journalism you can trust. Please consider supporting us with asubscription.
South Dakota
Obituary for Corry Francis Baragar at Kirk Funeral Home & Cremation Services
-
Connecticut1 week ago
Oxford church provides sanctuary during Sunday's damaging storm
-
Technology1 week ago
Breakthrough robo-glove gives you superhuman grip
-
Politics1 week ago
2024 showdown: What happens next in the Kamala Harris-Donald Trump face-off
-
News1 week ago
Who Are Kamala Harris’s 1.5 Million New Donors?
-
Politics1 week ago
Trump taunted over speculated RFK Jr endorsement: 'Weird as hell'
-
Politics1 week ago
Vivek Ramaswamy sounds off on potential RFK Jr. role in a Trump administration
-
World6 days ago
Portugal coast hit by 5.3 magnitude earthquake
-
Politics1 week ago
House GOP demands elite universities counteract 'dangerous' anti-Israel protests in the fall semester