Connect with us

Ohio

Why Ohio State is playing at one of college football’s slowest tempos

Published

on

Why Ohio State is playing at one of college football’s slowest tempos


COLUMBUS, Ohio — Ohio State’s offense ran the most plays it’s had in one game since the 2022 season on Saturday.

The 76 plays, which accounted for 34 points and 473 yards, are the most since Ohio State ran 77 plays in a loss to Michigan. The higher play count was more common in the 2022 season, when the Buckeyes averaged 67.4 plays per game.

That has significantly dropped in the years since.

Ohio State is averaging just 63.1 plays this season, according to TruMedia, and Saturday marked the second time this season that the Buckeyes ran more than 70 plays.

Advertisement

Much of that has to do with Ohio State’s defense. Led by defensive coordinator Matt Patricia, the top-ranked Buckeyes held Purdue to just 44 plays Saturday. Purdue had 13 first downs in the game; that type of dominance will show a large discrepancy on the play sheet.

Still, there’s been a fundamental change in how coach Ryan Day is running his program.

The pace of play has slowed. Entering Saturday’s game vs. UCLA, the Buckeyes rank No. 120 nationally in total plays (568) and average three minutes and 19 seconds of possession per drive, the slowest in the Day era. That’s not by coincidence or because Ohio State has a young quarterback in Julian Sayin.

Due to the expanded College Football Playoff and the sport’s ever-changing nature, Day has intentionally lowered his team’s play count. The only way to do that and remain a national title contender is to be efficient on offense. That’s the battle Day has been fighting for two years now, and winning.

“Efficiency is what we’re after because when you’re efficient and you’re playing like that, a three-score game can feel like it is way out of reach. Where I feel like maybe in the past it was like, ‘OK, we’re just getting started on the game,’” Day said on his radio show last Thursday.

Advertisement

Day hasn’t been afraid to embrace change in his seven years leading Ohio State’s football program.

A year ago, he decided to give up playcalling, putting his ego aside to help his program get over the hump and win its first national championship since 2014.

Although he was still involved with the practice and offensive game plan, with the name, image and likeness and transfer portal era taking over college football, he felt his time was better suited as the program’s CEO than everyday play caller.

Then, more change came, and he had to make another decision. Day knew that the time of up-tempo offenses finding success every down was over.

Ohio State pace of play under Ryan Day

Advertisement

Year

  

Plays/game

  

Seconds/play

Advertisement

  

Points/drive

  

2019

76.4

Advertisement

25.1

3.46

2020

71.3

27.2

Advertisement

3.01

2021

70.5

25.0

3.57

Advertisement

2022

67.4

27.4

3.36

2023

Advertisement

63.9

27.6

2.56

2024

61.8

Advertisement

29.4

3.12

2025

63.1

31.6

Advertisement

3.56

Defensive coordinators realized how to defend most up-tempo offenses, and when mixed with the ability to decode signals and the player-to-coach communication, it led Day to move to a huddled offense.

“Now they can’t see your formation, they don’t know your plays and can’t see your signals,” Day said. “Now, when you need to change pace and go tempo, it’s a good change of pace, but teams got really good at just seeing your formation and calling plays based on your formation. And then you’re shifting, and by that time, you might as well have just huddled up honestly.”

Ohio State’s pace slowed down in the 2023 season. It averaged 63.9 plays per game with Kyle McCord leading the offense, but at times, the efficiency wasn’t consistent. The Buckeyes averaged only 2.56 points per drive and scored a touchdown on just 31 percent of their drives, both career lows for a Day-led offense.

In 2024, things started to mesh better. Ohio State had a veteran roster, and with the player-to-coach communication approved for that season, the Buckeyes embraced being a huddle team and thrived.

Advertisement

They ran 61.8 plays per game, ran a play every 29.4 seconds, averaged 3.12 points per drive and scored a touchdown on 41.3 percent of their drives. It wasn’t the best year from an efficiency standpoint, but a drastic improvement from the 2023 season. That’s what Day wants: efficiency.

It’s the key to success if the play count is going to drop.

Efficiency isn’t everything, though. In the first year of the expanded playoff, Ohio State’s average total play count of 989 was still lower than playoff teams Texas, Penn State and Notre Dame, who each played 16 games, and Clemson, who played 14 games.

It kept Ohio State healthy throughout the championship run.

Due to the expanded College Football Playoff and the sport’s ever-changing nature, coach Ryan Day has lowered Ohio State’s play count. (Adam Cairns / Imagn Images)

Advertisement

“When you look at it from the beginning of the season, you look at it from a 20,000-foot view and say, ‘OK, we can cut down on the number of plays to keep our team healthy at the end of the season,’” Day said.

Now, with a year under its belt, Ohio State has been even slower and more efficient with its pace, despite a new quarterback and a completely new running back room.

The Buckeyes don’t just have their slowest time per possession under Day. They also have the slowest time per play at 31.6 seconds. Still, one could argue this is also Day’s most efficient offense.

Ohio State is averaging 3.56 points per drive and scoring a touchdown on 45.6 percent of its drives, both marks are the second highest in the Day era. It averaged 3.57 points per drive in 2021 and scored touchdowns on 46.5 percent of drives in 2019.

Those numbers will likely drop as the season goes on and the competition gets tougher, but it’s a sign of an offense that is extremely comfortable with its new identity.

Advertisement

“But once you get into the rhythm of huddling, you get used to that and guys get comfortable in it,” Day said.

He still believes there’s more Ohio State can accomplish.

Day wasn’t pleased with his program running 26 plays in the third quarter and the beginning of the fourth quarter and getting just three points. A 15-play drive to open the third quarter ended in a Sayin interception in the red zone.

“We had a lot of plays to only get three points, that’s not ideal,” Day said after the Purdue win. “Other than that, I thought there was a lot of good play.”

But more than anything, he juggles the need to play at the pace he wants while also becoming more explosive.

Advertisement

This has been the least explosive offense Day has had since taking over in 2019. Ohio State’s explosive rush rate is 7.8 percent, the lowest during his tenure. The explosive pass rate is 18.4 percent, although that’s not far off from last year’s 18.9 percent. The Buckeyes’ total explosive play rate is 12.7 percent, also the lowest in that time frame.

Day demands perfection from his offense, and he’s rarely satisfied. This year’s offense, while sometimes not flashy, has been one of the most efficient in his career, and though statistically it’s the slowest-paced offense, Day knows they can go tempo when they need to.

“We’re not going to go tempo just because we want to go tempo; it has to give us an advantage,” Day said. “When we are on the same page and we are being efficient and executing at a high level, that’s what’s most important, period. We are still chasing that. We aren’t there. But changing the tempo helps.”

As Ohio State enters the final postseason push, with a matchup with Michigan three weeks away, its pace of play has become a bigger national topic each week. The goal is for the Buckeyes to save themselves for the biggest moments, and when the time comes, they can play however they want.

“When it’s time to turn up the game, we will,” Day said.

Advertisement



Source link

Ohio

Matt Patricia sought stability in return as Ohio State football defensive coordinator

Published

on

Matt Patricia sought stability in return as Ohio State football defensive coordinator


Matt Patricia’s contract extension earlier this offseason included a pay raise that figures to make him the highest-paid assistant coach in college football this year.

But Patricia, who will make $3.75 million in guaranteed compensation as Ohio State’s defensive coordinator in 2026, also held an appreciation for his situation.

“Ohio State is such a special place, not only just the history, the tradition, the football program, the school, but the people here,” Patricia said. “Having a chance to have a little stability with my family, it’s hard when you have to move your family around, your kids and the new school and all that.”

Advertisement

Before he joined Ryan Day’s staff last year, the 51-year-old Patricia had bounced around as an assistant in the NFL for much of the decade.

He spent 2021 and 2022 in a variety of roles with the New England Patriots, then a year as a defensive assistant with the Philadelphia Eagles. He took off from coaching in 2024. The frequent relocation gave him perspective.

“We had an unbelievable experience settling into Columbus,” Patricia said. “Everybody’s been so nice and welcoming. It feels like home. It’s a big deal for us to be in a place where everybody’s happy. That’s really important.”

Advertisement

Patricia had a significant impact on the Buckeyes in his first year replacing Jim Knowles. Despite heavy roster attrition following their national championship season, he kept the defense atop the Football Bowl Subdivision. For the second straight season, no one allowed fewer points than Ohio State.

The 9.3 points per game allowed by the Buckeyes were the fewest by any defense since Alabama in 2011.

The success made Patricia a hot commodity on the coaching market, rebuilding his reputation as a sharp and creative football mind only a decade removed from his tenure as a Super Bowl-winning defensive coordinator for the Patriots. He was a finalist for the Broyles Award as the nation’s top assistant.

Patricia said he heard about opportunities in the NFL and elsewhere across the college football landscape, though none of them would pry him away from Ohio State.

Advertisement

“It wasn’t necessarily something where you’re looking to leave,” Patricia said, “but you do have to listen when those things come up. I’m just glad everything worked out.”

His challenge in his second season mirrors his previous one, as the Buckeyes are again managing the loss of eight starters on defense.

But unlike 2025, they have fewer returning pieces, relying on a larger class of transfers to help fill the holes on the depth chart.

“With as much coming into the program for the first time, not only are you trying to catch them up on the football scheme, but you’re also trying to catch them up on everything else,” Patricia said. “This is how we work, this is how we do things, this is the standard we’re looking for, this is how we practice, this is how we prepare, this is how we go to school. That has to be also taught. It becomes a lot, but that’s why you bring in the right guys that have the mental makeup to do all that.”

Joey Kaufman covers Ohio State football for The Columbus Dispatch. Email him at jkaufman@dispatch.com and follow him on @joeyrkaufman on X.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Which central Ohio schools get the best results for their money?

Published

on

Which central Ohio schools get the best results for their money?


play

Which central Ohio school districts get the most bang for their buck?

On average, school districts in Ohio spend $16,069 per-pupil for education, according to the education think tank Fordham Institute.

Advertisement

However, different district types spend different amounts of money. For example, large urban districts with very high poverty spend around $21,000 per-pupil, but small towns with low poverty spend around $14,900. The district type closest to the state average are those considered rural and high poverty and suburban districts with low poverty.

Aaron Churchill, lead Ohio researcher for the Fordham Institute, said that urban districts – like Columbus City Schools, the state’s largest district – often have higher spending because they can pull more in tax revenue and the state supports them at a higher rate because they are serving a higher proportion of disadvantaged students. Small, high-poverty towns on the other hand, generate less tax revenue from property values and district employee wages, the highest expense for schools, may be lowered by less market competition.

Churchill said schools should be focused on directing their funding toward initiatives that improve student outcomes and achievement.

“It’s making sure we’re focused on quality, we’re focused on performance, and that we’re rewarding performance,” Churchill said. “And we don’t do enough of that in the education system now.”

Advertisement

Churchill said there is a long-running debate among education researchers about whether increasing spending translates to meaningful results for students. Overall, school funding has increased on average over $2,000 per-pupil since 2015 and reached a record-high in 2025, according to the Fordham Institute.

“You can see in the numbers that we’re spending more than we ever have,” Churchill said. “The real million-dollar question is ‘Can our schools spend the money well?’”

Which central Ohio districts have the best results compared to funding?

The Dispatch compared overall spending per-pupil for central Ohio school districts to the ODEW’s performance index, using 2025 state data.

The Performance Index uses the performance level results for students in third grade through high school on Ohio’s state testing. The Performance Index (PI) score accounts for the level of achievement of every student, not just whether they are “proficient.” Higher performance levels receive larger weights in the calculation, but all achievement levels are included. Overall, the state average of performance scores was 91.8, according to 2025 state data.

Advertisement

The central Ohio school district with the highest spending was Columbus City Schools, which spent $24,505 per pupil and received a PI score of 60.7. The district with the highest PI was Grandview Heights Schools, which received a 106 PI score and spent $21,567 per pupil. New Albany-Plain Local Schools was a close second in PI at 105.1 while spending more than $4,000 less than Grandview Heights at $16,923 per-pupil.

Here’s how central Ohio schools stack up by spending versus achievements on tests, according to the Ohio Department of Education (sorted by highest spending per-pupil):

  • Columbus City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $24,505; PI score: 60.7
  • Grandview Heights Schools – Spending per-pupil: $21,567; PI score: 106
  • Bexley City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $21,025; PI score: 102.7
  • Dublin City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $18,702; PI score: 97.6
  • Worthington City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $18.573 ; PI score: 94.3
  • Madison-Plains Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $17,646; PI score: 88
  • New Albany-Plain Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,923; PI score: 105.1
  • Westerville City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,815; PI score: 89.7
  • Olentangy Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,780; PI score: 103.9
  • Groveport Madison Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,236; PI score: 72.6
  • Upper Arlington City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,282; PI score: 103.6
  • Canal Winchester Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16.154; PI score: 89.1
  • Average Ohio school district – Spending per-pupil: $16,069; PI score: 91.8
  • Reynoldsburg City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,956; PI score: 72.2
  • Gahanna-Jefferson City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,742; PI score: 89.7
  • Hilliard City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,694; PI score: 90
  • South Western City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,600; PI score: 78.5
  • Whitehall City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,593; PI score: 66.95
  • Johnstown-Monroe Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,163; PI score: 94.5
  • Jonathan Alder Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $14,803; PI score: 95.9
  • Pickerington Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $14,470 ; PI score: 90.9
  • Big Walnut Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $14,239; PI score: 95.1
  • London City – Spending per-pupil: $13,750; PI score: 81.3
  • Marysville Exempted Village Schools – Spending per-pupil: $13,608; PI score: 95.5
  • Licking Heights Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $13,585; PI score: 85.4
  • Hamilton Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $12,971; PI score: 82.2
  • Bloom-Carrol Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $12,720; PI score: 90.89
  • Licking Valley Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $12,587; PI score: 85

Cole Behrens covers K-12 education and school districts in central Ohio. Have a tip? Contact Cole at cbehrens@dispatch.com or connect with him on X at @Colebehr_report



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Ohio BCI breaks ground on new evidence collection building in London, Ohio

Published

on

Ohio BCI breaks ground on new evidence collection building in London, Ohio


Officials broke ground on a new evidence collection building for the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation in London, a project aimed at strengthening the agency’s crime-scene and cold-case work.

The new facility will replace BCI’s current evidence collection building, which is 800 square feet. Attorney General Dave Yost said the new building is needed to better track evidence and bring justice to victims as DNA technology evolves.

“But this story illustrates why it’s so important to have enough space to be able to hold the materials for these cases, to be able to store them properly, to maintain their integrity, so that when the science does catch up, we’re able to process a rape or a murder case and find the person who did it. There’s nothing that keeps me up at night more than thinking about unsolved cases,” Yost said.

The project is expected to take one year.

Advertisement
Comment with Bubbles

BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT

BCI also unveiled a new gun range at the Ohio Peace Officer Training Academy in London, intended to boost officers’ training.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending