Connect with us

Ohio

Ohio State 2025 NFL Draft prospects: An early look at where Emeka Egbuka, others may land

Published

on

Ohio State 2025 NFL Draft prospects: An early look at where Emeka Egbuka, others may land


Ohio State’s 2025 NFL draft class could be one for the ages, making the one just concluded feel like a prelude. Most of the key players from last year’s Buckeye team opted to come back, though many would have been high draft picks.

Thank the desire to finally beat Michigan and win a Big Ten championship and a national title as well as reaping the benefits of name, image and likeness for their returns to Columbus.

Ohio State likely will have double-digit draft picks in 2025, with numerous ones potentially going in the first round. Marvin Harrison Jr. was the only Buckeye taken among the first 32 picks this year.

Advertisement

The future draftees are spread at almost every position. The defensive line should be well-represented with Jack Sawyer, J.T. Tuimoloau and Tyleik Williams. Defensive backs Denzel Burke, Davison Igbinosun, Jordan Hancock and Lathan Ransom could hear their names early. On offense, receiver Emeka Egbuka, running backs TreVeyon Henderson and Quinshon Judkins, and guard Donovan Jackson could be the headliners.

Ohio State 2025 NFL draft prospects

Next year’s draft should be a Buckeye bonanza. Here’s a look at the top prospects, first on defense and then on offense:

Jack Sawyer, defensive end, senior

Sawyer made a splash late last season as he finished with five sacks in the Buckeyes’ final three games, including three against Missouri in the Cotton Bowl. If the trajectory continues as he lives up to his five-star pedigree, he could become Ohio State’s highest-drafted defensive lineman since Chase Young went No. 2 overall in 2020.

Advertisement

Denzel Burke, cornerback, senior

Starting for the Buckeyes since he was a freshman in 2021, Burke bounced last year after he slumped as a sophomore, reemerging as one of the top cover cornerbacks in college football. At 6-foot-1, he won’t be as lanky as other corner prospects, but he has a refined technique that limits completions against him. Burke’s confidence will also help with the jump.

J.T. Tuimoloau, defensive end, senior

Though his stat-stuffing performance at Penn State two years ago set the bar a bit high, Tuimoloau has been a consistent game-wrecker on the defensive line with his pass rush and run stuff. His combination of size and athleticism, allowing him to move around and drop in coverage, should put him high on teams’ draft boards next spring.  

Advertisement

Tyleik Williams, defensive tackle, senior

When Williams enrolled at Ohio State in 2021, he weighed more than 360 pounds. The extra pounds limited his stamina and snaps. But as he dropped 40 pounds, his role in the interior of the defensive line expanded, and he broke out as a junior last fall. Williams is still a physically imposing tackle at 6-foot-3 and 327 pounds, making him a load to handle for blockers.

Cody Simon, linebacker, senior

Simon is an instinctive inside linebacker in line to take over for Tommy Eichenberg as the “Mike” for the Buckeyes. He’s experienced, having started in 2021, as well as rotating for Eichenberg and as part of three-linebacker packages the last two seasons. Returning for his extra COVID-19 year of eligibility and moving up the depth chart, he’ll have a chance to raise his draft stock as a super senior.

Lathan Ransom, safety, senior

The talented safety missed the end of last season because of a foot injury. Though Ransom intended to enter the NFL draft before the injury, he is pleased to have another year as a Buckeye. He impressed as a sophomore in 2021 before breaking a leg in the Rose Bowl against Utah. Ransom had an excellent year in 2022 until the Michigan game. He ranked third on the team in tackles with 74 and was a Thorpe Award semifinalist.

Advertisement

Davison Igbinosun, cornerback, junior

After transferring from Mississippi to Ohio State last year, Igbinosun emerged as the starting cornerback opposite Burke and should be an intriguing prospect next spring if he forgoes his senior season. His 6-foot-2 frame gives him extra length for a cornerback, and he is also a strong tackler. His 59 tackles were the third-most for the Buckeyes.

Jordan Hancock, cornerback, senior

With Ohio State maintaining a deep group of cornerbacks, Hancock largely filled in as a slot safety last season. It’s easy to project Hancock as a nickel cornerback as a result, but the limited opportunities at outside cornerback could make him a more challenging evaluation for teams.

Advertisement

Ty Hamilton, defensive tackle, senior

A late bloomer in the mold of his older brother, he should see his role expand after he split starts with Mike Hall Jr. last season. Hamilton has been a valuable run stuffer for the Buckeyes and has good size for an interior tackle at 6-foot-3 and 295 pounds.

Emeka Egbuka, wide receiver, senior

Egbuka has been overshadowed for most of his Buckeye career, first by Jaxon Smith-Njigba and then by Marvin Harrison Jr. But he is a bona fide star in his own right. Egbuka has all the tools – speed, hands, work ethic, intelligence – to become the next first-round receiver from Ohio State.

TreVeyon Henderson, running back, senior

Injuries have kept Henderson from being the dominant runner he is capable of being. He has missed games in all three seasons as a Buckeye. The hope is that sharing the load with Quinshon Judkins will keep both of them fresh and limit the chance for injury. Henderson has the speed and elusiveness to make him a game-breaking threat whenever he finds daylight.

Advertisement

Quinshon Judkins, running back, junior

Judkins was a workhorse for Ole Miss in his first two seasons, and he was an All-SEC star. Judkins said he has no misgivings about sharing the load with Henderson because a lighter workload should make him more effective and be less of a grind on his body.

Donovan Jackson, guard, senior

Jackson was a five-star recruit who has been quite solid but not necessarily dominant so far. He has all the tools to become that type of player. Jackson is big, strong and athletic for a player his size and is a student of the game.

Advertisement

Will Howard, quarterback, senior

First, Howard has to secure the OSU starting job, which he has not done yet. But assuming that Howard beats out Devin Brown, he’ll have the keys to a high-powered offense. Howard might not be an elite passer yet, but has ideal size and mobility as well as maturity and other intangibles to make him a potential NFL quarterback.

Josh Simmons, offensive tackle, junior

Simmons was thrown into the deep end last year as a transfer from San Diego State. He arrived after spring practice and then switched from the right to left side of the line. Simmons had some struggles early but then settled in as the year progressed. Teammates describe him as an athletic freak. If the mental side of the game catches up with the physical, watch out.

Gee Scott Jr., tight end, senior

Scott finally gets a chance to start following the departure of Cade Stover to the NFL. A former receiver, Scott has gradually bulked up to become a capable blocker while maintaining his receiver skills.

Advertisement

Seth McLaughlin, center, senior

McLaughlin was a starter at Alabama, though his final year was marred by some snapping issues late in the season. Assuming that’s a blip, McLaughlin should solidify a center position that was a liability last year.

Josh Fryar, offensive tackle, senior

Fryar isn’t the most gifted athlete, but he is a grinder who’ll maximize his ability. There has been some speculation he might move inside to guard this season, but spring practice ended with him firmly back at right tackle.

Ohio State NFL draft picks 2024

  • Round 1, Pick 4: Marvin Harrison Jr., WR, Cardinals
  • Round 2, Pick 54: Mike Hall Jr., DT, Browns
  • Round 4, Pick 123: Cade Stover, TE, Texans
  • Round 5, Pick 148: Tommy Eichenberg, LB, Raiders

Get more Ohio State football news by listening to our podcasts



Source link

Advertisement

Ohio

Thousands head to Columbus for 23rd annual Home Improvement Show at Ohio Expo Center

Published

on

Thousands head to Columbus for 23rd annual Home Improvement Show at Ohio Expo Center


Thousands of people are expected to head to downtown Columbus for the 23rd annual Home Improvement Show this weekend.

Organizers say visitors can find ideas for everything from small interior design projects to major renovations.

The event is being held at the Ohio Expo Center and includes seminars, exhibits and demonstrations from local and national companies.

The show begins at noon Friday and runs until 6 p.m.

Advertisement

It continues Saturday from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. and Sunday from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m.

Adult tickets cost $5 at the door.



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Matt Patricia sought stability in return as Ohio State football defensive coordinator

Published

on

Matt Patricia sought stability in return as Ohio State football defensive coordinator


Matt Patricia’s contract extension earlier this offseason included a pay raise that figures to make him the highest-paid assistant coach in college football this year.

But Patricia, who will make $3.75 million in guaranteed compensation as Ohio State’s defensive coordinator in 2026, also held an appreciation for his situation.

“Ohio State is such a special place, not only just the history, the tradition, the football program, the school, but the people here,” Patricia said. “Having a chance to have a little stability with my family, it’s hard when you have to move your family around, your kids and the new school and all that.”

Advertisement

Before he joined Ryan Day’s staff last year, the 51-year-old Patricia had bounced around as an assistant in the NFL for much of the decade.

He spent 2021 and 2022 in a variety of roles with the New England Patriots, then a year as a defensive assistant with the Philadelphia Eagles. He took off from coaching in 2024. The frequent relocation gave him perspective.

“We had an unbelievable experience settling into Columbus,” Patricia said. “Everybody’s been so nice and welcoming. It feels like home. It’s a big deal for us to be in a place where everybody’s happy. That’s really important.”

Advertisement

Patricia had a significant impact on the Buckeyes in his first year replacing Jim Knowles. Despite heavy roster attrition following their national championship season, he kept the defense atop the Football Bowl Subdivision. For the second straight season, no one allowed fewer points than Ohio State.

The 9.3 points per game allowed by the Buckeyes were the fewest by any defense since Alabama in 2011.

The success made Patricia a hot commodity on the coaching market, rebuilding his reputation as a sharp and creative football mind only a decade removed from his tenure as a Super Bowl-winning defensive coordinator for the Patriots. He was a finalist for the Broyles Award as the nation’s top assistant.

Patricia said he heard about opportunities in the NFL and elsewhere across the college football landscape, though none of them would pry him away from Ohio State.

Advertisement

“It wasn’t necessarily something where you’re looking to leave,” Patricia said, “but you do have to listen when those things come up. I’m just glad everything worked out.”

His challenge in his second season mirrors his previous one, as the Buckeyes are again managing the loss of eight starters on defense.

But unlike 2025, they have fewer returning pieces, relying on a larger class of transfers to help fill the holes on the depth chart.

“With as much coming into the program for the first time, not only are you trying to catch them up on the football scheme, but you’re also trying to catch them up on everything else,” Patricia said. “This is how we work, this is how we do things, this is the standard we’re looking for, this is how we practice, this is how we prepare, this is how we go to school. That has to be also taught. It becomes a lot, but that’s why you bring in the right guys that have the mental makeup to do all that.”

Joey Kaufman covers Ohio State football for The Columbus Dispatch. Email him at jkaufman@dispatch.com and follow him on @joeyrkaufman on X.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Which central Ohio schools get the best results for their money?

Published

on

Which central Ohio schools get the best results for their money?


play

Which central Ohio school districts get the most bang for their buck?

On average, school districts in Ohio spend $16,069 per-pupil for education, according to the education think tank Fordham Institute.

Advertisement

However, different district types spend different amounts of money. For example, large urban districts with very high poverty spend around $21,000 per-pupil, but small towns with low poverty spend around $14,900. The district type closest to the state average are those considered rural and high poverty and suburban districts with low poverty.

Aaron Churchill, lead Ohio researcher for the Fordham Institute, said that urban districts – like Columbus City Schools, the state’s largest district – often have higher spending because they can pull more in tax revenue and the state supports them at a higher rate because they are serving a higher proportion of disadvantaged students. Small, high-poverty towns on the other hand, generate less tax revenue from property values and district employee wages, the highest expense for schools, may be lowered by less market competition.

Churchill said schools should be focused on directing their funding toward initiatives that improve student outcomes and achievement.

“It’s making sure we’re focused on quality, we’re focused on performance, and that we’re rewarding performance,” Churchill said. “And we don’t do enough of that in the education system now.”

Advertisement

Churchill said there is a long-running debate among education researchers about whether increasing spending translates to meaningful results for students. Overall, school funding has increased on average over $2,000 per-pupil since 2015 and reached a record-high in 2025, according to the Fordham Institute.

“You can see in the numbers that we’re spending more than we ever have,” Churchill said. “The real million-dollar question is ‘Can our schools spend the money well?’”

Which central Ohio districts have the best results compared to funding?

The Dispatch compared overall spending per-pupil for central Ohio school districts to the ODEW’s performance index, using 2025 state data.

The Performance Index uses the performance level results for students in third grade through high school on Ohio’s state testing. The Performance Index (PI) score accounts for the level of achievement of every student, not just whether they are “proficient.” Higher performance levels receive larger weights in the calculation, but all achievement levels are included. Overall, the state average of performance scores was 91.8, according to 2025 state data.

Advertisement

The central Ohio school district with the highest spending was Columbus City Schools, which spent $24,505 per pupil and received a PI score of 60.7. The district with the highest PI was Grandview Heights Schools, which received a 106 PI score and spent $21,567 per pupil. New Albany-Plain Local Schools was a close second in PI at 105.1 while spending more than $4,000 less than Grandview Heights at $16,923 per-pupil.

Here’s how central Ohio schools stack up by spending versus achievements on tests, according to the Ohio Department of Education (sorted by highest spending per-pupil):

  • Columbus City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $24,505; PI score: 60.7
  • Grandview Heights Schools – Spending per-pupil: $21,567; PI score: 106
  • Bexley City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $21,025; PI score: 102.7
  • Dublin City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $18,702; PI score: 97.6
  • Worthington City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $18.573 ; PI score: 94.3
  • Madison-Plains Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $17,646; PI score: 88
  • New Albany-Plain Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,923; PI score: 105.1
  • Westerville City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,815; PI score: 89.7
  • Olentangy Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,780; PI score: 103.9
  • Groveport Madison Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,236; PI score: 72.6
  • Upper Arlington City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,282; PI score: 103.6
  • Canal Winchester Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16.154; PI score: 89.1
  • Average Ohio school district – Spending per-pupil: $16,069; PI score: 91.8
  • Reynoldsburg City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,956; PI score: 72.2
  • Gahanna-Jefferson City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,742; PI score: 89.7
  • Hilliard City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,694; PI score: 90
  • South Western City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,600; PI score: 78.5
  • Whitehall City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,593; PI score: 66.95
  • Johnstown-Monroe Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,163; PI score: 94.5
  • Jonathan Alder Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $14,803; PI score: 95.9
  • Pickerington Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $14,470 ; PI score: 90.9
  • Big Walnut Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $14,239; PI score: 95.1
  • London City – Spending per-pupil: $13,750; PI score: 81.3
  • Marysville Exempted Village Schools – Spending per-pupil: $13,608; PI score: 95.5
  • Licking Heights Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $13,585; PI score: 85.4
  • Hamilton Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $12,971; PI score: 82.2
  • Bloom-Carrol Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $12,720; PI score: 90.89
  • Licking Valley Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $12,587; PI score: 85

Cole Behrens covers K-12 education and school districts in central Ohio. Have a tip? Contact Cole at cbehrens@dispatch.com or connect with him on X at @Colebehr_report



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending