Connect with us

Ohio

Mob chased Randolph Freedpeople away with bayonet, threats. Descendants deserve Ohio land.

Published

on

Mob chased Randolph Freedpeople away with bayonet, threats. Descendants deserve Ohio land.



“I propose identifying state-owned land in Mercer County and returning it to the descendants of the Randolph Freedpeople,” Dontavius Jarrells

State Representative Dontavius Jarrells, D-Columbus, is a member of the Ohio State House of Representatives, representing District 1, and serves as the assistant minority leader.

As the fundamental freedoms that would shape America were being drafted, our Founding Fathers declared that the People were “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

Advertisement

That declaration was not just a vision for their time, but a mandate for all generations to come.

The democracy our founders envisioned was never meant to be completed; it was to be an ongoing endeavor.

Today, as responsible citizens and leaders, it is our duty to continue this work. This requires acknowledging our failures, learning from them, and forging ahead together. Among our greatest failures, America’s original sin has been and remains—the enduring legacy of slavery.

Every so often, we are given an opportunity to confront this legacy and correct history’s greatest wrong. One such opportunity has presented itself through the story of the Randolph Freedpeople, a chapter of Ohio history that remains largely untold but is crucial to our collective understanding and growth.

Advertisement

Randoph Freedpeople denied promised land

In 1833, John Randolph of Roanoke, Virginia, freed his roughly 400 slaves, expressing deep regret for having owned them.

Randolph provided these freed individuals, known as the Randolph Freedpeople, with approximately 3,200 acres of land and the means to relocate. After a prolonged legal battle over his will, the Randolph Freedpeople began their exodus from Virginia to Mercer County, Ohio, in June 1846.

Their journey was met with resistance.

Advertisement

Upon learning of their arrival, white landowners in Mercer County resolved to prevent the Freedpeople from settling, even threatening violence. When the Randolph Freedpeople arrived, they were met by armed mobs and forced to turn back, despite having a legal right to the land.

Denied their promised land, the Randolph Freedpeople were left to wander, eventually settling in parts of Shelby and Miami County, with many making Piqua their new home.

Our View: We must remember, work against ‘America’s original sin’ this long weekend

For generations, they and their descendants have contributed significantly to their communities, to Ohio, and to America. Yet, the promise of freedom and opportunity that Ohio was supposed to represent was denied to them.

Correcting a grave error

Advertisement

This historical episode, unfolding in the years leading up to the Civil War, starkly illustrates that the freedom promised to slaves in the North was far from guaranteed. Ohio turned its back on the Randolph Freedpeople, and now is the time for us to acknowledge this failure, learn from it, and move forward.

With the help of the descendants of the Randolph Freedpeople and other local leaders, we have an opportunity to right this wrong.

We are looking at options to address the injustices faced by the descendants of the Randolph Freedpeople. Ohio lacked the courage to do the right thing then, but I believe we have the courage today.

This is our opportunity to continue the work started by our Founding Fathers. We can recognize this dark chapter in Ohio’s past and write a new one that brings hope, closure, and the promise of a better future. The America we live in today does not have to reflect the injustices of the past. By seizing opportunities like this, we can build a more perfect union, for all of us.

State Representative Dontavius Jarrells, D-Columbus, is a member of the Ohio State House of Representatives, representing District 1, and serves as the assistant minority leader.

Advertisement

Excerpt from Dontavius Jarrells letter to Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine on behalf of descendants of the Randolph Freedpeople delivered June 13:

“Upon his death in 1833, John Randolph of Roanoke, Virginia, freed his roughly 400 slaves, stating in his will that he ‘give and bequeath to all my slaves their freedom, heartily regretting that I have ever been the owner of one.’

Randolph also provided the freedpeople, known as The Randolph Freedpeople, with land and the means to relocate. After a prolonged legal battle over his will, the Randolph Freedpeople finally began their exodus from Roanoke, Virginia, in June 1846 to what was to be their new home in Mercer County, Ohio.

After several weeks of travel, the Randolph Freedpeople arrived in Cincinnati, where they took boats north on the Miami Erie Canal toward their final destination. However, word had spread to the white landowners in Mercer County that the former slaves were traveling to their new home legally inherited by them. The residents of Mercer County resolved, ‘we will not live among negroes, and as we have settled here first, we have fully determined that we will resist the settlement of blacks and mulattos in this country, to the full extent of our means, the bayonet not excepted.’

Advertisement

This was hardly in line with the dream of unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all.

When the Randolph Freedpeople finally made it to the shores of Mercer County, they were met by mobs of white residents and their bayonets. Left with the choice of staying and risking their lives, the Randolph Freedpeople turned their boats around and headed south along the canal.

Like Moses leading the Israelites out of slavery in Egypt, the Randolph Freedpeople were denied entrance to their promised land and forced to wander.

They eventually settled in parts of Shelby and Miami County, with many making Piqua, Ohio, their new home. For generations now, they have contributed to their community, to Ohio, and to America.

Advertisement

Considering this all happened in the years leading up to the Civil War, with a nation divided, the freedom promised to slaves in the North was anything but guaranteed. How Ohio handled this situation is a prime example.

Despite being given their freedom, Ohio turned its back on the Randolph Freedpeople. Now is the time for Ohio to acknowledge its failure, learn from it, and move forward.

With the help of descendants of the Randolph Freedpeople and other local leaders, I am exploring legal and just means to right this wrong and finally give what they legally inherited almost 200 years ago. And I seek your support.

I am not advocating for reparations or eminent domain. I propose identifying state-owned land in Mercer County and returning it to the descendants of the Randolph Freedpeople.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Ohio

Ohio Patrol helicopter video captures men throwing package over youth prison fence

Published

on

Ohio Patrol helicopter video captures men throwing package over youth prison fence



Infrared cameras mounted to a state patrol helicopter recorded two men chucking a package over the fence at an Ohio youth prison

play

Advertisement
  • Two men were caught on infrared camera throwing a package over the fence at Circleville Juvenile Correctional Facility.
  • The package contained THC vape pens, cell phones, and an external battery.
  • Several individuals, including a former DYS deputy superintendent, face charges related to the incident.
  • The former DYS employee allegedly purchased the contraband and had inappropriate relationships with incarcerated teens.

Infrared cameras mounted to an Ohio Highway Patrol helicopter recorded two men throwing a package over the fence at a state juvenile prison and then running through a field to evade capture.

The footage shows how troopers in the air spotted and tracked the suspects, relaying information to their colleagues on the ground. The bodies of the men glow white-hot in the footage, which allowed troopers to follow them even as one tried to hide in the woods.

Youth prison officials monitoring phone calls picked up on a plan to throw drugs over the fence at Circleville Juvenile Correctional Facility the night of Nov. 8, 2024. The Ohio State Highway Patrol’s aviation unit, on the ground troopers and DYS officials caught Korrell Bush allegedly throwing a package containing 15 THC vape pens, three cell phones, phone cables and an external cell phone battery over the fence.

Bush, now 21, has pleaded not guilty to illegal conveyance and receiving stolen property charges. His trial before Pickaway County Judge Matthew Chafin is scheduled for Sept. 18.

James Wilson and Juano Peyton, both now 19, pleaded guilty to complicity to illegal conveyance and Brandon Mitchell, 20, has a plea hearing scheduled for June 11.

A former Ohio Department of Youth Services deputy superintendent is scheduled to go on trial June 16 in the case. Renee Depalo, 39, of Massillon, has pleaded not guilty to complicity to convey contraband into a state prison, which is a third-degree felony.

Advertisement

The Ohio Department of Youth Services investigated allegations that Depalo had inappropriate relationships with incarcerated teens, including Wilson. Depalo, who worked at Indian River Juvenile Correctional Facility where Wilson had been previously incarcerated, resigned her state job May 18, 2024.

According to investigations conducted by DYS and the patrol, Depalo purchased the vape pens and cell phones at Wilson’s direction and provided them to Bush. Investigators also reported that Depalo and Bush exchanged text messages, though Depalo told troopers that she didn’t know the items were going to be thrown over the fence into the youth prison.

Ohio operates three youth prisons for children adjudicated for offenses that would be felonies if they were adults.

State government reporter Laura Bischoff can be reached at lbischoff@gannett.com and @lbischoff on X.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Facing Public Pushback, Ohio House Committee Says More Changes Are Coming To State’s Marijuana Overhaul Bill

Published

on

Facing Public Pushback, Ohio House Committee Says More Changes Are Coming To State’s Marijuana Overhaul Bill


An Ohio House committee took hours of public testimony on Wednesday about a bill that would make sweeping adjustments to the state’s adult-use marijuana legalization law, which was approved by voters in 2023. Amid overwhelming opposition from commenters and advocacy organizations, members said further amendments to the plan are forthcoming.

Already the House Judiciary Committee has taken steps to soften the restrictive bill, SB 56, in response to public pushback. Changes approved at a hearing late last month, for example rolled back some of the strict limits included in a verson of the measure passed by the Senate in February, including a criminal prohibition on sharing marijuana between adults on private property.

At the latest hearing, Rep. Jamie Callender (R), a longtime supporter of cannabis reform, reassured speakers that their concerns are being heard and further amendments are forthcoming.

“Thank you all for your participation,” Callender said. “As a result of that, there was a substitute bill put in last week that addressed a couple of the issues you talk about. And one of the reasons that it is not up for a vote today is we are still negotiating and working on some amendments to address several of the other issues.”

Advertisement

“The very specific issues you addressed have been being worked on or will be addressed in the next week or two,” he continued. “So for all of you that are here testifying, I want to thank you. You’ve made a difference. And it’s going to make a much better product. And I’m optimistic that you may not be perfectly happy, but you’re going to say, ‘You know, this is OK,’ when it comes up.”

Drug reform advocates have criticized both SB 56 and its House counterpart, HB 160, as restrictive measures that would undermine the will of voters who passed the state’s legalization law, Issue 2.

New changes already adopted, according to comments made at last week’s hearing on the bill, would remove the legislation’s earlier criminal penalty for sharing marijuana or intoxicating hemp products among adults, provided that the sharing takes place on private property.

Certain outdoor concert venues would also be exempt from laws against open consumption provided they have separate smoking and vaping areas.

The committee amendment also removed a provision that would have created a mandatory minimum sentence for someone caught consuming marijuana in the passenger seat of a vehicle.

Advertisement

Notably under the amended bill, THC-infused beverages containing up to five milligrams of THC could be carried in stores statewide rather than just in dispensaries. A $3.50 per gallon tax would be levied on THC beverages.

A separate 10 percent tax on marijuana products in the bill would also apply to intoxicating hemp products.

While especially high-potency products would still be forbidden under the amended bill, regulators at the Division of Marijuana Control could by rule increase the allowable potency above the initial 70-percent THC cap.

Licensed dispensaries would also be able to sell and transfer marijuana to other license holders.

Other changes increased the amount of tax revenue going to municipalities that host cannabis businesses, upping it to 25 percent of state cannabis revenue for a period of seven years. That’s a higher amount than was contemplated in any other marijuana bill this session.

Advertisement

Despite the recent changes, opponents nevertheless lined up at Wednesday’s hearing to call for further adjustments.

The advocacy group Marijuana Policy Project (MPP), which has been critical of the bill since its introduction, said in written testimony that it continues “to strongly opposed the bill as currently drafted,” asserting that the proposal would “punish adults for innocuous conduct that is legal for alcohol.”

For example, MPP says the bill in its current form would still prohibit adults from sharing homegrown marijuana, with sharing only allowed of products purchased from a state-licensed storefront.

Sharing would also be permitted only at a person’s primary residence, MPP noted, meaning that “people visiting friends couldn’t share cannabis at their friends’ house,” people camping couldn’t share an edible and “people visiting from out-of-state and homeless individuals could not share cannabis anywhere.”

It could also put drivers at risk of misdemeanor charges for carrying lotions, edibles or other infused products unless those products are stored in the trunk or similarly inaccessible location, the group said.

Advertisement

“This is nonsensical for lotions and tinctures,” MPP said in its written testimony. “It also doesn’t make much sense for edibles, which don’t even take effect for an hour and which would in no way impair a driver if a passenger used them.”

The group’s testimony also noted that SB 56 in its current form still eliminates elements of legalization that voters themselves approved, such as support for social equity and jobs programs.

“It also removes product types and opportunities for new businesses, eliminates the social equity and jobs program, strips away funding for expungement and legal aid, sunsets and reduces host communities’ revenue share, and eliminates the ability of cities who may opt in late to have local dispensaries,” MPP said of the bill.

Cat Packer, director of drug markets and legal regulation for the group Drug Policy Alliance and a practitioner in residence at Ohio State University’s drug enforcement and policy center, told the panel on Wednesday that “it seems as if the legislature is intent on disregarding the will of Ohio voters.”

First, she recommended lawmakers “eliminate any new criminal penalties that have been established by these bills.”

Advertisement

“Every single new criminal penalty needs to be struck out, otherwise we don’t actually understand what legalization means,” Packer said.

She also called out legislators for gutting the voter-approved social equity and jobs program.

“If it’s the word ‘equity’ that concerns you, please, by all means, rename the program,” Packer urged. “But please do not abandon Ohioans and Ohio communities, because that is what will happen if we abandon abandon this program.”

“We should be creating opportunities for small and minority businesses,” she added. “It’s not just minority businesses that were to be provided a pathway towards inclusion through this program, but veterans and persons with disabilities. You all would be disregarding those folks as well.”


Marijuana Moment is tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters pledging at least $25/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don’t miss any developments.

Advertisement

Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker and become a supporter on Patreon to get access.

Packer also said host communities should get a share of revenue not just for a seven-year period, as the latest version of the bill dictates, but “into perpetuity.”

“Where is the money? Where is it?” she said. “It’s ours. It belongs to Ohio communities.”

In March, a survey of 38 municipalities by the Ohio State University’s (OSU) Moritz College of Law found that local leaders were “unequivocally opposed” to earlier proposals that would have stripped the planned funding.

Rep. Brian Stewart (R) noted at the previous committee hearing that the latest provision around host community funding was the most generous lawmakers had offered all session.

Advertisement

“The Senate’s version of the bill was zero percent. The governor’s introduced version of the bill was zero percent,” he said, adding that HB 160 itself initially set a 20-percent allocation for five years. “We have increased that to 25 percent over seven years.”

Stewart said he hoped the Senate would either concur with the changes or that lawmakers could “maybe have a short conference committee” to hammer out any remaining details.

Callender at the time said he hoped to see more amendments made. Following Wednesday’s hearing, those appear to be in the works.

Meanwhile in Ohio, adults are now able to buy more than double the amount of marijuana than they were under previous limits, with state officials determining that the market can sustainably supply both medical cannabis patients and adult consumers.

Effective Wednesday, adults can purchase up to 2.5 ounces of flower cannabis per day—a significant increase compared to the prior daily transaction limit of one ounce. The change will make it so consumers could buy marijuana in an amount that matches the 2.5 ounce possession limit under state statute.

Advertisement

A Department of Commerce spokesperson told Marijuana Moment on Tuesday that “back when the non-medical program came online, there were lower limits on non-medical sales, which was primarily to help ensure there was an adequate supply for medical patients.”

“A subsequent review of the available inventory data supports this increase adjustment up to the statutory limits identified in the statute,” they said.

A budget measure from Gov. Mike DeWine (R) is also a potential vehicle for changes to the state’s marijuana law. As proposed, it would remove local tax allocations of medical marijuana revenue and double the state cannabis tax rate to 20 percent—though legislative leaders have said they will be removing the tax increases.

Meanwhile, DeWine in March announced his desire to reallocate marijuana tax revenue to support police training, local jails and behavioral health services. He said funding police training was a top priority, even if that wasn’t included in what voters passed in 2023.

Ohio’s Senate president has also pushed back against criticism of the Senate bill, claiming the legislation does not disrespect the will of the electorate and would have little impact on products available in stores.

Advertisement

Separately in the legislature this month, Sens. Steve Huffman (R) and Shane Wilkin (R) introduced legislation that would impose a 15 percent tax on intoxicating hemp products and limit their sales to adult-use dispensaries—not convenience stores, smoke shops or gas stations

DeWine has repeatedly asked lawmakers to regulate or ban intoxicating hemp products such as delta-8 THC.

GOP Congressional Committee Proposes Ban On Hemp Products With THC That Advocates Say Would Have ‘Devastating’ Impact On Industry

Photo courtesy of Chris Wallis // Side Pocket Images.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with support from readers. If you rely on our cannabis advocacy journalism to stay informed, please consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Advertisement

Become a patron at Patreon!





Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Day: Big Ten deserves 4 automatic spots in CFP

Published

on

Day: Big Ten deserves 4 automatic spots in CFP


COLUMBUS, Ohio — After winning the first 12-team College Football Playoff and a national title as an at-large selection in 2024, Ohio State coach Ryan Day would like to see future models include at least four automatic qualifying spots for the expanded Big Ten.

As college football leaders discuss the next version of the CFP, beginning with the 2026 season, there has been recent pushback against templates that include more automatic spots for the Big Ten and the SEC.

At last week’s SEC spring meetings, support grew for a model that included automatic entries for the top five conference champions and 11 at-large spots in a playoff that would expand from 12 to 16 teams next year. Big 12 commissioner Brett Yormark and league administrators last week also voiced support for the 5+11 CFP model.

The Big Ten has not publicly advocated for a specific playoff model, but it has discussed one that would automatically include four teams for the Big Ten and for the SEC, two each for the Big 12 and ACC, and one for the top Group of 5 champion. The Big 12 and the ACC opposed that plan.

“We’re in the Big Ten, and we have 18 teams and some of the best programs in the country,” Day told ESPN. “I feel like we deserve at least four automatic qualifiers.”

Day noted how the most recent Big Ten expansion added the top teams from the original Pac-12, including the only two — Oregon and Washington — that made the four-team CFP and played for national titles. Washington reached the championship game after the 2023 season, falling to Michigan, and Oregon won the Big Ten last fall and earned the No. 1 overall seed in the CFP, losing to Ohio State in a quarterfinal matchup at the Rose Bowl.

“You would have had at least a team or two [in the CFP] from out there,” Day said, referring to the original Pac-12. “So it only makes sense when you have 18 teams, especially the quality of teams that you would have [in] that many teams representing the Big Ten.”

Day added that a CFP model with more automatic spots will benefit the sport because it will incentivize stronger nonconference scheduling, especially given the discrepancies in conference scheduling models.

Advertisement

Big Ten and Big 12 teams play nine league games per season, while SEC and ACC teams play eight. Ohio State reached last year’s CFP with two regular-season league losses, but it also didn’t face a Power 4 opponent in nonleague play. Michigan won the final national title of the four-team CFP without playing a Power 4 nonconference opponent.

The Buckeyes open the 2025 season by hosting Texas, last year’s SEC runner-up and a team they defeated in a CFP semifinal matchup at the Cotton Bowl.

“If you don’t have those automatic qualifiers, you’re less likely to play a game like we’re playing this year against Texas, because it just won’t make sense,” Day said. “If we do, then you’re more likely to do that, because we play nine conference games in the Big Ten. The SEC doesn’t. So it’s not equal.”

Both Ohio State and national runner-up Notre Dame played 16 games last season — a number that will become the norm with an ever-expanding playoff. Day said his team, which played its best during the CFP run, benefited from a larger roster, with him noting that roster limits of 105 following the impending House-NCAA settlement will provide challenges.

“I’m concerned about 16 or 17 games with a 105-man roster,” Day said. “With 120, it’s about maxed-out. You have to stay healthy, and all it takes are a couple injuries during that long of a run. But in the NFL, you can hire somebody off of waivers. In college football, you can’t. I’m concerned about the length of the season with 105.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending