Connect with us

North Dakota

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA COUNTY OF BURLEIGH

Published

on

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA COUNTY OF BURLEIGH


STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA COUNTY OF BURLEIGH Larson Latham Huettl LLP, Plaintiff vs. Kelly A. Hallworth a.ok.a Kelly A. Bell, Defendant. IN DISTRICT COURT SOUTH CENTRAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT COMPLAINT Case No. 08-2022-CV-01228 1.Plaintiff Larson Latham Huettl LLP, for its reason for motion in opposition to the Defendant Kelly A. Hallworth, alleges and exhibits the Courtroom as follows: 2.Plaintiff Larson Latham Huettl LLP (LLH) was, and is, a legislation agency positioned in Bismarck, North Dakota. 3.Defendant Kelly A. Hallworth (Hallworth) retained Plaintiff LLH to carry out authorized providers concerning a disorderly conduct restraining order petition. 4.On or about Could 29, 2018, Defendant Hallworth executed a written settlement with Plaintiff LLH agreeing to pay Plaintiff LLH for authorized prices incurred whereas representing Defendant Hallworth within the disorderly conduct restraining order petition motion. 5.Plaintiff LLH attended Defendant Hallworth’s petition listening to held on February 12, 2019, and supplied providers for and on behalf of Defendant Hallworth in accord with the Price Settlement. 6.Plaintiff LLH incurred 600 nineteen {dollars} and forty-eight cents ($619.48) of lawyer charges for phone conferences with the consumer, authorized analysis, assembly with the consumer, getting ready for the listening to, illustration on the listening to, journey to and from the courthouse, and negotiations with opposing counsel. Defendant Hallworth was billed this quantity per and in accord with the phrases of the Price Settlement and, thus far, mentioned quantity stays unpaid. 7.Regardless of quite a few makes an attempt made by Plaintiff LLH to gather the excellent steadiness from Defendant Hallworth, Defendant Hallwroth nonetheless refuses to pay. 8.Defendant Hallworth’s present obligation to Plaintiff LLH, as of June 2, 2022, is 9 hundred thirty-three {dollars} and eighty-seven cents ($983.87). Late fee prices proceed to accrue at 1.5 % monthly per the Price Settlement entered into by the events. 9.WHEREFORE, Plaintiff LLH prays for judgment in opposition to Defendant Hallworth as follows: A. Prejudgment and post-judgment curiosity as supplied by the Price Settlement to the extent permitted by North Dakota legislation; B. Restoration of prices and disbursements; C. Affordable lawyer’s charges and bills as supplied within the Price Settlement and to the extent permitted by North Dakota legislation; and, D. Such different and additional reduction because the Courtroom deems simply and equitable. Respectfully submitted this 2nd day of June, 2022. LARSON LATHAM HUETTL LLP Lawyer for the Plaintiff 1100 School Drive Bismarck, ND 58502-2056 (701) 223-5300 /s/ Miguel A. Surun (June 8, 2022) 71162





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

North Dakota

Live box score: No. 7 UND at No. 2 North Dakota State

Published

on

Live box score: No. 7 UND at No. 2 North Dakota State


FARGO — The 117th meeting between North Dakota and North Dakota State will take place Saturday at 2:30 p.m. in the Fargodome.

Recaps of scoring plays as they happen will be posted below.

NDSU 7, UND 0, 10:39 left: The Bison move quickly on their first drive. After a questionable 15-yard pass interference on Antonio Bluiett, NDSU’s CharMar Brown scores from 2 yards out.

NDSU 14, UND 0, 2:18 left: After picking up a third-and-7, Cam Miller goes deep for Bryce Lance. Lance beats Clayton Bishop deep for a 36-yard touchdown connection.

Advertisement
Miller has covered sports at the Grand Forks Herald since 2004 and was the state sportswriter of the year in 2019 and 2022.

His primary beat is UND football but also reports on a variety of UND sports and local preps.

He can be reached at (701) 780-1121, tmiller@gfherald.com or on Twitter at @tommillergf.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Dakota

Vote 'yes' on North Dakota Measure 1, but 'no' on Measure 3

Published

on

Vote 'yes' on North Dakota Measure 1, but 'no' on Measure 3


Two statewide measures on North Dakota’s upcoming ballot offer residents a chance to make a difference in the future of the state — one is based on new economics, the other on new social norms and courtesies.

Measure 1 seeks to make changes to how the state Constitution defines institutions in Grafton, Devils Lake and Jamestown. Measure 3 seeks to decrease the funding that can be expended from the Legacy Fund during a single biennium.

Here’s a look at each:

Although a simple majority vote in the Legislature is required to place a proposed constitutional amendment before the voters, Senate Concurrent Resolution 4001 passed without a single “no” vote during the last legislative session.

Advertisement

The real surprise isn’t that the proposal was unanimously passed, but rather that it’s taken this long. Specifically, the measure seeks to change the official name of the state institutions to be more in line with societal evolution that has taken place over the decades. It would change the State School for the Deaf and Dumb in Devils Lake to the State School for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing; the State Hospital for the Insane in Jamestown to the State Hospital for Individuals With Mental Illness; and the Institution for the Feeble Minded in Grafton to a “facility for individuals with developmental disabilities.” The latter already has been called the Life Skills and Transition Center, but Measure 1 will make it official.

We urge a “yes” vote on Measure 1, and may this be the last time those phrases are used in print.

A statewide vote in 2010 established the Legacy Fund, a piggy bank for the people that collects 30% of tax revenue from oil and natural gas extraction in the state. In its first 13 years, the fund grew past $9 billion.

Now, a constitutional amendment seeks to decrease the amount of principal available for spending each biennium, from 15% to 5% of the total. The amendment would provide for distribution from the Legacy Fund to a Legacy earnings fund, rather than have the accrued earnings be sent to the state’s general fund, as currently happens.

We don’t like the proposal. Why put constraints on future spending, especially if some sort of tragedy or emergency occurs?

Advertisement

And what about the next great idea — one we cannot fathom today but one that might require a large and expedient expenditure to push it to fruition?

Measure 3 seems like an idea not to spend money. We believe North Dakotans should embrace the state’s prosperity. The Legacy Fund was established to provide a better future for the state, and it’s time to start thinking about what that future will look like.

Vote no on Measure 3.

This Forum Communications Co. editorial represents the views of Forum Communications Co., this newspaper’s parent company. It was written by the FCC Editorial Advisory Board.

Advertisement
By
FCC Editorial Advisory Board
The FCC Editorial Advisory Board is a collection of Forum Communications Co. leaders and editors who advise management and write editorials and commentary on the company’s editorial positions and operations periodically.
Readers may contact the editorial board via email:
fccadvisory@forumcomm.com





Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

ORLP Program awards North Dakota a grant of nearly $4.5 million for development projects

Published

on

ORLP Program awards North Dakota a grant of nearly .5 million for development projects


GRAND FORKS, N.D. (KFYR) – A grant of nearly $4.5 million from the National Park Service is giving the City of Grand Forks a chance to begin one of its projects that will create more recreational activities in the area.

Thanks to the funding the state received from this grant, the City of Grand Forks is being provided with $3,489,750 to cover phase one of a three-phased masterplan to enhance the Grand Forks Downtown Gateway and Greenway.

“This funding was available, and we met with the North Dakota Parks and Recreation, with Char, and said ‘Is there any chance at all that our project would qualify for funding?’” said Kim Greendahl, Greenway specialist for the city of Grand Forks.

This is the first time the state of North Dakota has qualified for this grant since the beginning of the Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership Program in 2014.

Advertisement

This year, the program awarded the largest grant investment in its history, giving nearly $254 million in 24 states. To qualify, communities needed to have populations of 30,000 or more.

“Before, the requirements were more stringent; populations of 50,000, so a lot of the cities in North Dakota didn’t qualify, but this year it was opened up to multiple cities,” said Char Langehaug, grants coordinator for the North Dakota Parks and Recreation Department.

Residents and visitors of Grand Forks can expect phase one to bring a playground area and outdoor learning space, a picnic shelter and a nature promenade. Phase two and three will bring people closer to the water and the addition of a pedestrian bridge.

“The community has really gotten behind this project and it’s exciting, lots of outdoor recreation whilst still being in a flood plain,” said Greendahl.

The City of Grand Forks says it predicts the construction of phase one will officially begin in 2026.

Advertisement

One million dollars of the funds given to North Dakota will be used to enhance the Turtle Mountain Family Recreation Area.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending